Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Green Restaurant Decision Formation Using the VAB Model: The Effect of Environmental Concerns upon Intent to Visit
Next Article in Special Issue
Environmental Justice and Sustainability Impact Assessment: In Search of Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts Caused by Coal Mining in Inner Mongolia, China
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Understanding Relationships among Agro-Ecosystem Services Based on Emergy Analysis in Luancheng County, North China
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2014, 6(12), 8720-8735; doi:10.3390/su6128720

Biomass Power Generation Industry Efficiency Evaluation in China

and
†,*
School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, No. 2 Bei Nong Road, Beijing 102206, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 July 2014 / Revised: 18 November 2014 / Accepted: 24 November 2014 / Published: 1 December 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability in China: Bridging Global Knowledge with Local Action)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [965 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]   |  

Abstract

In this paper, we compare the properties of the traditional additive-based data envelopment analysis (hereafter, referred to as DEA) models and propose two generalized DEA models, i.e., the big M additive-based DEA (hereafter, referred to as BMA) model and the big M additive-based super-efficiency DEA (hereafter, referred to as BMAS) model, to evaluate the performance of the biomass power plants in China in 2012. The virtues of the new models are two-fold: one is that they inherited the properties of the traditional additive-based DEA models and derived more new additive-based DEA forms; the other is that they can rank the efficient decision making units (hereafter, referred to as DMUs). Therefore, the new models have great potential to be applied in sustainable energy project evaluation. Then, we applied the two new DEA models to evaluate the performance of the biomass power plants in China and find that the efficiency of biomass power plants in the northern part of China is higher than that in the southern part of China. The only three efficient biomass power plants are all in the northern part of China. Furthermore, based on the results of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank-sum test and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, there is a great technology gap between the biomass power plants in the northern part of China and those in the southern part of China. View Full-Text
Keywords: biomass power plants; big M additive-based DEA model; negative data biomass power plants; big M additive-based DEA model; negative data
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, Q.; Tao, J. Biomass Power Generation Industry Efficiency Evaluation in China. Sustainability 2014, 6, 8720-8735.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top