Next Article in Journal
Social Capital and Walkability as Social Aspects of Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainability Indicators Integrating Consumption Patterns in Strategic Environmental Assessment for Urban Planning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Whose Diversity Counts? The Politics and Paradoxes of Modern Diversity
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2013, 5(8), 3447-3472; doi:10.3390/su5083447

Rethinking Education for All

Faculty of Education and International Studies, Department of International Studies and Interpreting, Oslo and Akershus University College (HIOA), Pilestredet 40, PB 4 St. Olavs plass, Oslo NO-0130, Norway
Received: 8 June 2013 / Revised: 16 July 2013 / Accepted: 1 August 2013 / Published: 13 August 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endangered Human Diversity: Languages, Cultures, Epistemologies)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [761 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]   |  

Abstract

The rational for this paper is contextualized within a broader national and international agenda of reaching Education for All (EFA), knowledge transformation and production with an overall focus on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). Whose education and whose development is at issue? The purpose of this paper is to reconceptualize EFA in a broader developmental context. Definitions of formal-, non-formal and informal education are applied in order to analyze the epistemological perspectives underlying the educational achievements more than two decades after Jomtien in 1990. Concepts of contextualized expansive education and   object-oriented learning will be used to reveal the systemic causes of the challenges the individual actors experience in their daily learning activities. Two case studies further illustrate how a broad stakeholder involvement through collective design and implementation created innovation and educational transformation that contributed to relevant and sustained learning/knowledge and development at an individual and community level. The paper argues that in the current sociocultural context, responses to EFA need to be based on a comprehensive national education strategy, situated in the local context. By creating space for educational innovation, through interaction and negotiation, the confluence of the epistemological lenses characterizing formal, non-formal, and informal learning could ultimately be a strategy to adequately respond to the diversified learning needs of the population and sustainable developmental of the country. One expected outcome of the paper is a contribution to the future strategies of EFA beyond 2015, built on the urgent requirements for inter-professional partnership and collaboration through a multidimensional approach to education and learning. View Full-Text
Keywords: Education for All; education and sustainable development; formal; non-formal; informal education; transformative education; relevance; Indigenous and Western knowledge; expansive learning Education for All; education and sustainable development; formal; non-formal; informal education; transformative education; relevance; Indigenous and Western knowledge; expansive learning
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Carm, E. Rethinking Education for All. Sustainability 2013, 5, 3447-3472.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top