Sustainability 2013, 5(2), 478-495; doi:10.3390/su5020478
Article

Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management

1 Department of Anthropology, University of Oslo, PO Box 1091, Blindern, N0317 Oslo, Norway 2 American Indian Studies Program, School of Anthropology, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Arizona, Harvill 218, Tucson, AZ 85721-0076, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 31 October 2012; in revised form: 11 January 2013 / Accepted: 16 January 2013 / Published: 31 January 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endangered Human Diversity: Languages, Cultures, Epistemologies)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [84 KB, uploaded 31 January 2013 12:07 CET]
Abstract: This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Norway and Columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. Both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sámi and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with how such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation’s natural-resource management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economies, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and American constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes’ hierarchies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labeled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted while in the Tana, biological sustainability became prioritized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other.
Keywords: politics of nature; cultural and biological sustainability; salmon; indigeneity; postcolonial epistemology

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ween, G.B.; Colombi, B.J. Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management. Sustainability 2013, 5, 478-495.

AMA Style

Ween GB, Colombi BJ. Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management. Sustainability. 2013; 5(2):478-495.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ween, Gro B.; Colombi, Benedict J. 2013. "Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management." Sustainability 5, no. 2: 478-495.

Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert