Next Article in Journal
Ecotourism versus Mass Tourism. A Comparison of Environmental Impacts Based on Ecological Footprint Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Safe vs. Fair: A Formidable Trade-off in Tackling Climate Change
Previous Article in Journal
A Sustainable Ethanol Distillation System
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Turbo Drive for the Global Reduction of Energy-Related CO2 Emissions
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2012, 4(1), 106-122; doi:10.3390/su4010106

Intergenerational Justice: How Reasonable Man Discounts Climate Damage

1
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Sciencepark 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
Research group Philosophy and Public Affairs, University of Amsterdam, Oude Turfmarkt 141-147, 1012 GC Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Received: 26 October 2011 / Revised: 14 December 2011 / Accepted: 31 December 2011 / Published: 5 January 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Policy on Climate Equity)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [81 KB, 24 February 2015; original version 24 February 2015]

Abstract

Moral philosophers and economists have evaluated the intergenerational problem of climate change by applying the whole gamut of theories on distributive justice. In this article, however, it is argued that intergenerational justice cannot imply the application of moral ideal theories to future generations. The formal principle of equality simply requires us to treat like cases as like. If intergenerational justice is to have any meaning, it would require future generations to receive the same treatment under the law and the same treatment from the authorities, as far as cases are like. In the context of climate change, the reasonable man standard from tort law is of particular relevance. There is no justification to handle pollution across generational boundaries according to norms which differ from the (international) laws for handling pollution across national borders. It is argued that this implies, for example, that a zero social rate of time preference should be used in cost-benefit analysis of climate policy: climate damage experienced by future generations should be discounted neither for their higher expected wealth, nor purely for their being remote. View Full-Text
Keywords: intergenerational justice; equity; climate change; social rate of time preference; reasonable man; risk; tort law; future generations intergenerational justice; equity; climate change; social rate of time preference; reasonable man; risk; tort law; future generations
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Davidson, M.D. Intergenerational Justice: How Reasonable Man Discounts Climate Damage. Sustainability 2012, 4, 106-122.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top