Next Article in Journal
The Century Ahead: Searching for Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Comments on ‘Straka, T.J.; Layton, P.A. Natural Resources Management: Life Cycle Assessment and Forest Certification and Sustainability Issues. Sustainability 2010, 2, 604–623’
Commentary published on 18 August 2010, see Sustainability 2010, 2(8), 2617-2620.

Sustainability 2010, 2(8), 2621-2625; doi:10.3390/su2082621
Reply

Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg

*  and
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, P.O. Box 340317, Clemson, SC 29634-0317, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 18 July 2010 / Accepted: 17 August 2010 / Published: 18 August 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resources Management: Life Cycle Assessment)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [117 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]

Abstract

An unreferenced statement on page 608 is challenged as being incorrect. FSC and PEFC are competitors and issues on the differences between the programs are often arguable. We do agree that a small portion of the statement could have been more clearly stated, but the intent of the statement was essentially correct. The original article contained 80 references and not every sentence could be referenced. We include 18 additional references below to strengthen and clarify our statement.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

Further Mendeley | CiteULike
Export to BibTeX |
EndNote |
RIS
MDPI and ACS Style

Straka, T.J.; Layton, P.A. Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg. Sustainability 2010, 2, 2621-2625.

View more citation formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

For more information on the journal, click here

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert