Next Article in Journal
The Century Ahead: Searching for Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Comments on ‘Straka, T.J.; Layton, P.A. Natural Resources Management: Life Cycle Assessment and Forest Certification and Sustainability Issues. Sustainability 2010, 2, 604–623’
A comment was published on 18 August 2010, see Sustainability 2010, 2(8), 2617-2620.

Sustainability 2010, 2(8), 2621-2625; doi:10.3390/su2082621
Reply

Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg

*  and
Received: 18 July 2010; Accepted: 17 August 2010 / Published: 18 August 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resources Management: Life Cycle Assessment)
Download PDF [117 KB, uploaded 18 August 2010]
Abstract: An unreferenced statement on page 608 is challenged as being incorrect. FSC and PEFC are competitors and issues on the differences between the programs are often arguable. We do agree that a small portion of the statement could have been more clearly stated, but the intent of the statement was essentially correct. The original article contained 80 references and not every sentence could be referenced. We include 18 additional references below to strengthen and clarify our statement.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Straka, T.J.; Layton, P.A. Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg. Sustainability 2010, 2, 2621-2625.

AMA Style

Straka TJ, Layton PA. Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg. Sustainability. 2010; 2(8):2621-2625.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Straka, Thomas J.; Layton, Patricia A. 2010. "Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg." Sustainability 2, no. 8: 2621-2625.

Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert