Next Article in Journal
What Is the Efficiency of Fast Urbanization? A China Study
Previous Article in Journal
University Students’ Social Demand of a Blue Space and the Influence of Life Experiences
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applying Soil Health Indicators to Encourage Sustainable Soil Use: The Transition from Scientific Study to Practical Application
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Sustainability 2018, 10(9), 3179; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093179

Leverage Points for Governing Agricultural Soils: A Review of Empirical Studies of European Farmers’ Decision-Making

Department of Economics, UFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 May 2018 / Revised: 24 July 2018 / Accepted: 31 August 2018 / Published: 5 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment and Governance of Sustainable Soil Management)
Full-Text   |   PDF [4279 KB, uploaded 6 September 2018]   |  

Abstract

What drives farmers’ decision-making? To inform effective, efficient, and legitimate governance of agricultural soils, it is important to understand the behaviour of those who manage the fields. This article contributes to the assessment and development of innovative soil governance instruments by outlining a comprehensive understanding of the determinants of farmers’ behaviour and decision-making. Our analysis synthesises empirical literature from different disciplines spanning the last four decades on various farm-level decision-making problems. Based on a conceptual framework that links objective characteristics of the farm and the farmer with behavioural characteristics, social-institutional environment, economic constraints, and decision characteristics, empirical findings from 87 European studies are presented and discussed. We point out that economic constraints and incentives are very important, but that other factors also have significant effects, in particular pro-environmental attitudes, goodness of fit, and past experience. Conversely, we find mixed results for demographic factors and symbolic capital. A number of potentially highly relevant yet understudied factors for soil governance are identified, including adoption of technologies, advisory services, bureaucratic load, risk aversion and social capital, social norms, and peer orientation. Our results emphasise the importance of a broad behavioural perspective to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and legitimacy of soil governance. View Full-Text
Keywords: agricultural policy; behavioural studies; literature review; soil functions; soil pressures agricultural policy; behavioural studies; literature review; soil functions; soil pressures
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bartkowski, B.; Bartke, S. Leverage Points for Governing Agricultural Soils: A Review of Empirical Studies of European Farmers’ Decision-Making. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3179.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top