Next Article in Journal
Whole-Genome Analysis of a Novel Fish Reovirus (MsReV) Discloses Aquareovirus Genomic Structure Relationship with Host in Saline Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Mediates RSV Infection in Vitro and in Vivo
Previous Article in Special Issue
CCR5 Targeted Cell Therapy for HIV and Prevention of Viral Escape
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Viruses 2015, 7(8), 4254-4281; doi:10.3390/v7082819

Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops

Scienceindustries, Swiss Business Association Chemistry Pharma Biotech, P.O. Box 1826, Zurich CH-8021, Switzerland
Academic Editor: Thomas Hohn
Received: 30 May 2015 / Revised: 21 July 2015 / Accepted: 22 July 2015 / Published: 30 July 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gene Technology and Resistance to Viruses - Reviews)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [179 KB, uploaded 30 July 2015]

Abstract

A wide gap exists between the rapid acceptance of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation by farmers in many countries and in the global markets for food and feed, and the often-limited acceptance by consumers. This review contrasts the advances of practical applications of agricultural biotechnology with the divergent paths—also affecting the development of virus resistant transgenic crops—of political and regulatory frameworks for GM crops and food in different parts of the world. These have also shaped the different opinions of consumers. Important factors influencing consumer’s attitudes are the perception of risks and benefits, knowledge and trust, and personal values. Recent political and societal developments show a hardening of the negative environment for agricultural biotechnology in Europe, a growing discussion—including calls for labeling of GM food—in the USA, and a careful development in China towards a possible authorization of GM rice that takes the societal discussions into account. New breeding techniques address some consumers’ concerns with transgenic crops, but it is not clear yet how consumers’ attitudes towards them will develop. Discussions about agriculture would be more productive, if they would focus less on technologies, but on common aims and underlying values. View Full-Text
Keywords: farmers; consumers; risk/benefit perception; knowledge; trust; personal attitudes; politics; GMO labeling; new breeding techniques farmers; consumers; risk/benefit perception; knowledge; trust; personal attitudes; politics; GMO labeling; new breeding techniques
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lucht, J.M. Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops. Viruses 2015, 7, 4254-4281.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Viruses EISSN 1999-4915 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top