Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Revisiting the Importance of Orthobunyaviruses for Animal Health: A Scoping Review of Livestock Disease, Diagnostic Tests, and Surveillance Strategies for the Simbu Serogroup
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of Three Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Anti-S and One Anti-N Immunoassays for the Monitoring of Immune Status and Vaccine Response
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing Reassortment between Bluetongue Virus Serotypes 10 and 17 at Different Coinfection Ratios in Culicoides sonorenesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 16
Issue 2
10.3390/v16020293
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Study of Bluetongue Virus (BTV) and Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus (EHDV) Circulation and Vectors at the Municipal Parks and Zoobotanical Foundation of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil (FPMZB-BH)

by
Eduardo Alves Caixeta
1,
Mariana Andrioli Pinheiro
1,
Victoria Souza Lucchesi
1,
Anna Gabriella Guimarães Oliveira
1,
Grazielle Cossenzo Florentino Galinari
1,
Herlandes Penha Tinoco
2,
Carlyle Mendes Coelho
2 and
Zélia Inês Portela Lobato
1,*
1
Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine (DMVP), Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil
2
Belo Horizonte Municipal Parks and Zoobotany Foundation (FPMZB-BH), Belo Horizonte 31365-450, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2024, 16(2), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16020293
Submission received: 1 December 2023 / Revised: 18 January 2024 / Accepted: 19 January 2024 / Published: 15 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Culicoides-Borne Viruses 2023)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bluetongue Virus (BTV) and Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus (EHDV) are Orbiviruses primarily transmitted by their biological vector, Culicoides spp. Latreille, 1809 (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). These viruses can infect a diverse range of vertebrate hosts, leading to disease outbreaks in domestic and wild ruminants worldwide. This study, conducted at the Belo Horizonte Municipal Parks and Zoobotany Foundation (FPMZB-BH), Minas Gerais, Brazil, focused on Orbivirus and its vectors. Collections of Culicoides spp. were carried out at the FPMZB-BH from 9 December 2021 to 18 November 2022. A higher prevalence of these insects was observed during the summer months, especially in February. Factors such as elevated temperatures, high humidity, fecal accumulation, and proximity to large animals, like camels and elephants, were associated with increased Culicoides capture. Among the identified Culicoides spp. species, Culicoides insignis Lutz, 1913, constituted 75%, and Culicoides pusillus Lutz, 1913, 6% of the collected midges, both described as competent vectors for Orbivirus transmission. Additionally, a previously unreported species in Minas Gerais, Culicoides debilipalpis Lutz, 1913, was identified, also suspected of being a transmitter of these Orbiviruses. The feeding preferences of some Culicoides species were analyzed, revealing that C. insignis feeds on deer, Red deer (Cervus elaphus) and European fallow deer (Dama dama). Different Culicoides spp. were also identified feeding on humans, raising concerns about the potential transmission of arboviruses at the site. In parallel, 72 serum samples from 14 susceptible species, including various Cervids, collected between 2012 and 2022 from the FPMZB-BH serum bank, underwent Agar Gel Immunodiffusion (AGID) testing for BTV and EHDV. The results showed 75% seropositivity for BTV and 19% for EHDV. Post-testing analysis revealed variations in antibody presence against BTV in a tapir and a fallow deer and against EHDV in a gemsbok across different years. These studies confirm the presence of BTV and EHDV vectors, along with potential virus circulation in the zoo. Consequently, implementing control measures is essential to prevent susceptible species from becoming infected and developing clinical diseases.

1. Introduction

Bluetongue Virus (BTV) and Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus (EHDV) belong to the genus Orbivirus [1]. They possess a segmented double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) genome, an icosahedral capsid, and consist of ten genomic segments (seg-1 to seg-10), encoding seven structural proteins (VP1 to VP7) and four non-structural proteins (NS1, NS2, NS3/NS3a, and NS4). VP2 is identified as the primary immunodeterminant of the viral serotype [2,3,4]. These viruses, recognized for affecting a wide variety of vertebrate hosts, can trigger disease outbreaks in domestic and wild ruminants globally [5,6,7,8].
Currently, 27 notifiable serotypes of BTV are recognized by the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH), adding the “atypical” serotypes, there are a total of 36 serotypes (BTV-1 to BTV-36) identified to date. In turn, EHDV has seven identified serotypes (EHDV-1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) [2,3,4,9]. The serotypes of both BTV and EHDV exhibit antigenic variation among themselves and can demonstrate different virulence, pathogenesis, tissue tropisms, and clinical signs in the same hosts. Animals that survive the infection develop specific antibodies against the infecting serotype. However, the absence of cross-protection increases the risk of outbreaks when introducing an exotic serotype to animals previously exposed to other virus serotypes [4,5,10,11,12].
BTV and EHDV are arboviruses primarily transmitted by their biological vector, Culicoides spp. Latreille, 1809 (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), which become infected by feeding on the blood of viremic animals [13,14]. Culicoides insignis Lutz, 1913, and C. pusillus Lutz, 1913, are the only confirmed competent vectors in Brazil [13,14,15,16].
Infection with BTV and EHDV leads to systemic hemorrhages due to vascular injuries [17]. Clinical disease typically occurs when susceptible animals are introduced to enzootic areas or when new serotypes are introduced into endemic regions, highlighting the complex interplay among hosts, viral serotypes, vectors, and the environment [5,17]. Given the similarity in clinical signs and the potential for co-circulation of these viruses, laboratory diagnosis becomes essential to differentiate infections, utilizing both serological and molecular methods [11,12,18].
Both BTV and EHDV are classified as notifiable diseases by the World Organization for Animal Health [11,12] and the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply (MAPA), in accordance with Normative Instruction No. 50, dated September 24, 2013 [19]. In Brazil, ten BTV serotypes (BTV-1, 3, 4, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 22, and 24) and two EHDV serotypes (EHDV-1 and 2) were identified through direct methods [20,21,22,23,24]. Furthermore, serum-positive samples for an additional nine BTV serotypes (BTV-2, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 20, 21, and 26) were reported [21,25,26]. Viral isolations of BTV were conducted in both, wild and domestic animals, providing more comprehensive information about this virus in South America compared to EHDV, which was isolated primarily from wild animals. Additionally, limited serological studies involving EHDV were conducted in this region.
Outbreaks of BTV and EHDV affecting Cervids have been documented in conservation centers, zoos, and wildlife establishments in Brazil. Despite the likely underreporting of cases, Brazil is considered an endemic region for BTV [20,24,25], and potentially for EHDV as well. Globally, BTV has caused and continues to cause outbreaks in various parts of the world. Notable incidents include the BTV-8 outbreaks that resulted in severe losses in Europe and the ongoing BTV-3 outbreak causing multiple cases across different European regions. The latter has already been identified in cattle and sheep, posing a risk of fatalities in various species and potential spread to other regions worldwide [5,7,27].
In 2020, a female Brow brocket (Subulo gouazoubira) succumbed to EHDV at the Belo Horizonte Municipal Parks and Zoobotany Foundation (FPMZB-BH), Minas Gerais, Brazil [28]. Our research focused on identifying various Culicoides spp. species inhabiting the FPMZB-BH from December 2021 to November 2022. This thorough investigation allowed us to delineate periods of heightened dipteran proliferation, pinpointing when the resident animals were most vulnerable to Orbivirus infections. Additionally, we delved into the origins of blood ingested by Culicoides spp. species to unveil potential hosts, aiming to elucidate the feeding preferences of these insects. Furthermore, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of sera stored in the FPMZB-BH serum bank from 2012 to 2022. Analyzing these archived samples over a decade facilitated the identification of susceptible species to these viruses and potential amplifying hosts. These studies have significantly contributed to the implementation of strategic control measures within the zoo and have advanced our comprehension of Orbivirus behavior in the Brazilian context.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experiment Locations and Authorizations

The samples under study were sourced from the Belo Horizonte Municipal Parks and Zoobotany Foundation (FPMZB-BH), Minas Gerais, Brazil. Sample processing and subsequent laboratory tests took place at the Animal Virology Research Laboratory (LPVA) within the Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine (DMVP) at the School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG).
Official authorization for this research was obtained from the Biodiversity Authorization and Information System (SISBIO) under reference number 80725. Ethical clearance was granted by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA) at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) with protocol number 233/2021. Furthermore, approval was secured from FPMZB-BH.

2.2. Culicoides Collection

The Culicoides spp. collections were conducted from 9 December 2021 to 18 November 2022, at the FPMZB-BH. A minimum of two collections per month were performed, every two weeks, on various dates, avoiding rainy days. In total, 25 collections were carried out, with each collection defined as the interval between the installation and removal of all traps. Trap placement occurred at 4:00 p.m., with retrieval at 8:00 a.m. the following day, following the guidelines proposed by Harrup [29].
Six traps were deployed for dipteran capture and subsequent species identification at FPMZB-BH. New Standard Miniature Blacklight traps, model 1212 (John W. Hock Company, Gainesville, FL, USA), suction-powered, 220 V, equipped with 8 W ultraviolet (UV) bulbs (model 1212), and one CDC Mini Light Trap with Incandescent Light modified to incorporate a UV bulb (John W. Hock Company, Gainesville, FL, USA), generously provided by the Pirbright Institute (Surrey, UK).
Each trap, labeled from 1 to 6 (A1 to A6), was strategically positioned as follows: A1 near the enclosures of the camel and llama, A2 and A3 near the enclosures of fallow deer, red deer, marsh deer, and oryx, A4 in a mixed enclosure housing tapirs, lowland paca, giant anteaters, and rheas, A5 near the enclosures of the waterbuck and zebra, and A6 between the enclosures of the elephants and white rhinoceros.
The selection of optimal points for trap installation involved assessing the proximity to hosts, choosing locations sheltered from rain, analyzing the surrounding vegetation, maintaining a recommended minimum distance between traps (at least 50 m), and considering nearby light sources that could interfere with captures. The traps were positioned at a minimum height of 1.5–2 m above the ground, following recommended protocols [29], and maintained the same arrangement throughout the entire experiment.
Throughout all collections, data related to the date, sunrise and sunset times, maximum and minimum temperatures, maximum and minimum humidity, season, lunar brightness, rainfall, daily atmospheric pressure, presence of feces accumulation near the traps, trap performance during collections, temperature, and humidity at the installation and removal of each trap, as well as the total number of Culicoides spp. collected, were recorded. The collection period spanned from 9 December 2021 to 18 November 2022. The captured insects were stored in wide-mouth bottles, shielded from light, containing 70% alcohol, properly sealed, and labeled with information about the collection period and location in the zoo, then forwarded to the LPVA for species identification.

2.3. Identification of Culicoides spp.

The identification and characterization of Culicoides spp. species, including the determination of gender and gonadotropic stage for the analysis of the seasonal distribution of different species, were carried out following the procedures described by [29]. The characterization of wing pigmentation patterns for each specimen was performed using the identification keys from Farias [30], Castellón and Veras [31], Farias, Almeida and Pessoa [32], Santarém and Felippe-Bauer [15], Borkent and Dominiak [33], and Rios et al. [34].

2.4. Molecular Analysis of Culicoides spp. Blood Meal Hosts

Engorged females of species identified as potential vectors of BTV and EHDV were selected: C. insignis, C. debilipalpis, and C. pusillus. The engorged abdomens of Culicoides spp. were meticulously separated from the rest of the insect using entomological needles and processed following the protocol outlined by Carvalho et al. [35]. The identification of the species that the insects fed on was conducted using the cytochrome b (Cyt b) gene. All samples exhibiting a band on the 2% agarose gel for the Cyt b gene underwent sequencing at CT Vacinas (Minas Gerais, Brazil). Subsequently, a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST®) search on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) platform was performed for sample identification [36,37].
From these samples, it was possible to sequence and identify the blood meal sources of 12 individuals: 7 from C. insignis, 3 from C. debilipalpis, and 2 from C. pusillus.

2.5. Serum Samples from FPMZB-BH

A total of 72 serum samples, collected between 2012 and 2022 in accordance with zoo protocols and stored at −20 °C in the serum bank of FPMZB-BH, were tested. These samples originated from 62 animals representing 14 distinct species, including South American Tapir (Tapirus terrestris), Bactrian Camel (Camelus bactrianus), European Fallow Deer (Dama dama), Marsh Deer (Blastocerus dichotomus), Red Deer (Cervus elaphus), Waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus), Common Eland (Taurotragus oryx), African Bush Elephant (Loxodonta africana), Common Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), Llama (Lama glama), Gemsbok (Oryx gazella), White Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum), Brown Brocket (Subulo gouazoubira), and Plains Zebra (Equus quagga).
The sera underwent testing for BTV and EHDV using Agar Gel Immunodiffusion (AGID) test. Antigens produced in the LPVA were employed, including EHDV-2 NEC2630 isolated in the LPVA [20] and BTV-4 provided by the Pan-American Foot-and-Mouth Disease Center. The testing procedures adhered to protocols outlined in the manuals provided by the WOAH [11,12].

2.6. Statistics

Geospatial and climatic data for the FPMZB-BH site (Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil) were collected using GPS devices. Weather information was sourced from The Weather Channel website (weather.com), accessed on all collection dates throughout the project. Additionally, data from the Brazilian National Institute of Meteorology (INMET) covering the entire period of Culicoides spp. captures were incorporated. These datasets were utilized to assess the situation regarding BTV and EHDV at the zoo.
Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the relative risk of various Culicoides spp. collections, establishing relationships with factors such as air humidity, temperature, rainfall index, luminosity, season, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, and lunar phase. Statistical tools including Excel Windows, JAMOVI, and STATA were employed for these analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Collections and Identification of Culicoides spp.

A total of 568 specimens of Culicoides spp., representing various species, were captured. Detailed data for each capture can be found in Table S1.
Among the traps, A1 had the highest capture (198 specimens), followed by A6 (108), and A2 had the lowest collection (36). For detailed data on the collection in each trap, refer to Table S2.
The most frequently identified species was C. insignis, totaling 426 specimens, followed by C. paraensis and C. pusillus with 35 and 32 specimens, respectively. Regarding the gonadotrophic stages, the most prevalent was the parous stage (298 specimens), followed by the nulliparous stage (156). Males and the gravid stage had the lowest counts, each totaling 27 specimens. Further detailed data, including the number of individuals captured for each species, group, gender, and gonadotrophic stage, are provided in Table S3.
In the summer months, characterized by higher temperatures and humidity, the peak Culicoides spp. capture occurred, reaching 241 specimens in February. A decline was observed during the colder and drier winter months, with no individuals found in September. Refer to Table S4 for monthly data on the quantity of specimens captured, broken down by species. The total number of individuals captured each month can be visualized in Figure S1.
Univariate and multivariate analyses, assessing the relative risk of Culicoides spp. captures (Table S5), indicated that temperature, humidity, precipitation, trap location, the presence of feces accumulation near traps, and the date of collection were the most influential factors. It is noteworthy that these variables may exhibit associations, complicating independent comparisons. For instance, temperature and humidity strongly correlate with the collection date, and the presence of feces accumulation near traps correlates with trap location. These interrelationships among factors may have influenced the analyses.
It is noteworthy that, in addition to the Culicoides species previously recorded in the state of Minas Gerais, C. debilipalpis Lutz, 1913, was identified for the first time in this state.

3.2. Molecular Analysis of Culicoides spp. Blood Meal Hosts

The results of the sequenced engorged blood samples for each Culicoides spp. species can be viewed in Table 1.
Belo Horizonte Zoos do not have any of the following species identified in Table 1: chital (Axis axis), sambar deer (Cervus unicolor), Red collared dove (Streptopelia tranquebarica), brown creeper (Certhia americana), Iranian lizard (Agamura kermansis), or Amazonian fish (Teleocichla mindanensis). These results could are probably due to an incomplete availability of sequences from the conserved region of Cyt b in databases for some possible hosts, especially Brazilian species, and due to the presence of highly similar sequences.

3.3. Serological Tests

The results of the AGID tests for BTV and EHDV are available in Table 2.
A South American Tapir showed seropositivity for BTV in a sample collected in 2017. However, in a sample from 2019, it was found to be seronegative, and in a sample collected in 2020, it once again exhibited seropositivity. Regarding a European Fallow Deer, it was seronegative for BTV in the 2013 sample but showed seropositivity for this virus in the 2014 sample. On the other hand, a Gemsbok, which initially tested seronegative for EHDV in a 2012 sample, turned out to be seropositive for this virus in the 2014 sample. These results show that these viruses are circulating in the zoo.

4. Discussion

Following the death of a female Brow brocket (Subulo gouazoubira) due to EHDV at FPMZB-BH in 2020 [28], this research was formulated to investigate the presence of Orbivirus vectors and evaluate the seropositivity for BTV and EHDV of the animals inhabiting this environment. The primary objective was to comprehend the circulation of these viruses within the zoo context and to discern their potential implications for the overall health of the resident animals.
C. insignis emerged as the predominant species in our collections, consistently observed across all traps and in most months, except during the winter period from June to September. This observation aligns with a study conducted by Laender et al. [38], which identified C. insignis as the most prevalent species in Minas Gerais. Carvalho and Silva’s research [39] in Maranhão, Brazil, also emphasized the prevalence of C. insignis, particularly in locations with mammals, such as corrals and pigsties.
The second most commonly found species was C. pusillus, raising concerns as this species, along with C. insignis, is identified as a vector for BTV and EHDV [13,16].
This is the first identification of C. debilipalpis in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, despite its presence in various other regions of South and Southeast Brazil [33]. C. debilipalpis, previously described as a potential vector of BTV and EHDV in North America [40,41,42,43,44], is known to feed on Orbivirus hosts, and viral replication of BTV and EHDV in this insect was confirmed when feeding on infected blood [42]. According to the literature reviews conducted, this study is believed to be the first to document the identification of C. debilipalpis feeding on African elephants and tapirs, both potential Orbivirus hosts. Notably, in contrast to previous studies describing the preference of C. debilipalpis for Cervids, no individuals in the present study fed on species from this group [40,45,46]. Consequently, further studies are imperative to confirm the role of C. debilipalpis in the transmission cycle of BTV and EHDV.
The distribution of the collected samples, analyzed in terms of gender and gonadotropic stage, aligns with previous research [47,48] where parous females were observed in greater or equal quantities compared to other stages.
A generalist feeding behavior of C. insignis was identified, supporting previous studies where this species was observed feeding on birds, rodents, and dogs [49]. It is plausible that the studied species exhibit opportunistic behavior, adapting their feeding habits to nearby species, regardless of the host’s nature. That can be a possibility for the identification that all Culicoides spp. species feed in human samples in the blood meal analysis (Homo sapiens). This implies a higher possibility of arbovirus transmission [50] and the bite of C. insignis is associated with allergic dermatitis in different species [51]. This behavior may be attributed to the migratory pattern of vertebrates and the small size of Culicoides spp., which can be carried several kilometers by the wind [52]. This adaptation would be essential for these insects to meet their nutritional needs in different environments and locations [35,47,50]. These could be some of the reasons for the broad range of hosts of Culicoides spp. Studies suggest that generalist species may experience a reduction in their vectorial capacity due to the wide variety of hosts they feed on. However, this generalist feeding habit may allow for the transmission of pathogens across a broader range of hosts, contributing to the maintenance of cycles of different diseases [50,53]. Additionally, generalist species tend to be more abundant as they can survive in diverse environments, facilitating transmission and assisting in the maintenance of cycles of different diseases [35]. An important finding was the substantial abundance of C. insignis sequences originating from Red Deer and Fallow Deer, suggesting a potential preference for feeding on Cervids by this Culicoides species.
Despite the complexity of inferring feeding preferences based on the analysis of blood ingested by Culicoides spp., this approach provides valuable insights into which species deserve greater attention, particularly in the case of potential vectors of BTV and EHDV, such as C. insignis, C. pusillus, and C. debilipalpis. Understanding the different hosts of each Culicoides spp. species is crucial for the development of more accurate predictive models regarding pathogen transmission and the formulation of effective prevention strategies for various diseases [54].
In the hot and humid months, characteristic of summer, such as February, more Culicoides spp. individuals and species were collected compared to the cold and dry months, such as September. In the winter collections, a reduction in the capture of all species was observed, with some not being found for several months, such as C. pusillus and C. foxi. This is due to the fact that Culicoides spp. are thermophilic species, and this characteristic, combined with the reduction of the extrinsic incubation period (EIP) due to higher temperatures in the summer, points to a higher risk of Orbivirus infection in hot and humid months [13,16]. Precipitation also influences the selection of days for trap placement, resulting in a greater number of insects captured on rain-free days, despite humidity being important to this dipteran reproduction. Culicoides spp., being small insects, are adversely affected by heavy rains, particularly accompanied by wind, which interferes with the collections [16,55].
In a detailed analysis of how the location of each trap affected the collections, we identified that the presence of an accumulation of feces near traps and proximity to water sources proved to be relevant factors. That is due to the fact that Culicoides spp. feed and reproduce in humid places with the presence of organic matter [16]. Another identified aspect of increased midge capture is related to placing traps outside enclosures, aligning with the exophagic and exophilic behavior of these insects [56].
Another factor that may have influenced the number of insects collected could be the presence of certain nearby hosts. It is possible that a higher number of insects collected near camels (Trap A1) and elephants (Trap A6) could be due to the larger amount of feces produced by these animals, less competition for space for these hematophagous insects, and less activity of larger animals. Also, previous research has identified that the proximity of camels to traps could lead to an increase in collections in those areas [47,57].
The combination of these variables resulted in variations in the collection rates of Culicoides spp., as well as in the number of species collected in each trap. Trap A1, which showed the highest collection, encompassed all the key factors identified in the analysis. Notably, the presence of C. insignis was more pronounced in this trap compared to other species, suggesting the existence of some specific attractant for this particular species.
When comparing FPMZB-BH with other zoos worldwide that have been the subject of Culicoides spp. collection projects, we observe a great diversity of collected species, similar to the present study. However, several previous studies have reported higher quantities of Culicoides spp. collected compared to the current project. For instance, at the National Zoological Gardens of South Africa, between 2002 and 2004, Labuschagne et al. [48] collected 478,040 specimens, and in another study at Chester Zoo in 2008, Vilar et al. [57] collected 35,401 specimens. However, a study conducted by Nelder et al. [58] at Greenville Zoo and Riverbanks Zoo in 2007 collected 101 and 88 Culicoides spp., respectively, numbers closer to those obtained in the present research. This variation can be attributed to the different environmental conditions of each zoo and the distinct habits of Culicoides spp. species in each region.
A higher prevalence of seropositive animals for BTV was observed, totaling 75%, compared to EHDV, which recorded 19%. This disparity suggests a potentially more significant circulation of BTV in the FPMZB-BH region, although the specific serotypes are still unknown. However, the considerable number of seronegative animals for EHDV raises concerns about the susceptibility of these animals to potential infection by this virus.
It is crucial to highlight that the majority of Cervids from different species exhibited seropositivity for BTV, with several also testing positive for EHDV. The identification of C. insignis feeding on Cervids indicates that these species are at risk of infection.
African ruminants (Gemsboks, Waterbuck, and Eland), Camelids (llamas and camels), and the tested elephant showed seropositivity for Orbiviruses, corroborating previous findings [10,47,59,60,61], suggesting the possible involvement of these African ruminants in these viruses’ cycle.
The seropositivity of a tapir for BTV, as revealed in this study, aligns with findings, in free-ranging animals, from a prior study conducted in the Brazilian savanna by Fernandes-Santos et al. [62], which also identified seropositive individuals of this species for BTV. It is noteworthy that tapirs are listed as a vulnerable species and are distributed throughout Brazil [63]. Moreover, our data show variation in serological results over time in an animal of this species, suggesting the possibility of a decline in antibody levels, reinfection, or exposure to new viral serotypes. Associated with these findings the identification of C. debilipalpis feeding on tapir emphasizes the potential involvement of these animals in the epidemiology of BTV and EHDV in Brazil.
The observation of seroconversion in animals from one year to another, both for EHDV (in the case of one gemsbok) and BTV (one fallow deer and one tapir), suggests that these animals were infected within the zoo. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct RT-PCR tests for viremia detection in animals before new animals are introduced in the zoo and in cases of transferring animals between zoos.

5. Conclusions

This study identified Orbivirus vectors and seropositive animals in the zoo, confirming the circulation of BTV and EHDV in the FPMZB-BH, which are infecting different mammal species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v16020293/s1, Table S1: Data for each Culicoides spp. capture; Table S2: Information on the nearby enclosure of each trap and the amount of captured Culicoides spp. in each one; Table S3: Information on Culicoides spp. species and groups in relation to gender and gonadotropic stage, collected at FPMZB-BH during the period from December 2021 to November 2022; Table S4: Information on Culicoides spp. species and groups collected at FPMZB-BH during the period from December 2021 to November 2022, in relation to each month of collection; Figure S1: Graph depicting the total number of Culicoides spp. collected at FPMZB-BH for each month of the project; and Table S5: Statistical analysis of the variables involving the Culicoides spp. captures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A.C., M.A.P. and Z.I.P.L.; methodology and validation, E.A.C., M.A.P., V.S.L., A.G.G.O., G.C.F.G., H.P.T. and C.M.C.; formal analysis, E.A.C., M.A.P., A.G.G.O. and Z.I.P.L.; investigation, E.A.C. and M.A.P.; resources, E.A.C., M.A.P. and Z.I.P.L.; writing—review and editing, E.A.C. and Z.I.P.L.; supervision and project administration, Z.I.P.L.; funding acquisition, M.A.P. and Z.I.P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Brazilian Agencies National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel Foundation (CAPES) and Minas Gerais State Agency for Research and Development (FAPEMIG).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animal experimentation protocols were approved by the Biodiversity Authorization and Information System (SISBIO) (project license number: 80725), the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA) of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) (project license number: 233/2021), and the FPMZB-BH.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in the main manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the staff of the FPMZB-BH and the Postgraduate Program in Animal Science at the Veterinary School, UFMG.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, Orbivirus. Available online: https://ictv.global/taxonomy/taxondetails?taxnode_id=202104877 (accessed on 6 December 2022).
  2. Belbis, G.; Zientara, S.; Bréard, E.; Sailleau, C.; Caignard, G.; Vitour, D.; Attoui, H. Bluetongue Virus: From BTV-1 to BTV-27. In Advances in Virus Research; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 161–197. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bumbarov, V.; Golender, N.; Jenckel, M.; Wernike, K.; Beer, M.; Khinich, E.; Zalesky, O.; Erster, O. Characterization of bluetongue virus serotype 28. Transbound. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 67, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sailleau, C.; Breard, E.; Viarouge, C.; Belbis, G.; Lilin, T.; Vitour, D.; Zientara, S. Experimental infection of calves with seven serotypes of Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease virus: Production and characterization of reference sera. Vet. Ital. 2019, 55, 339–346. [Google Scholar]
  5. Maclachlan, N.J.; Zientara, S.; Wilson, W.C.; Richt, J.A.; Savini, G. Bluetongue and epizootic hemorrhagic disease viruses: Recent developments with these globally re-emerging arboviral infections of ruminants. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2019, 34, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nol, P.; Kato, C.; Reeves, W.K.; Rhyan, J.; Spraker, T.; Gidlewski, T.; Vercauteren, K.; Salman, M. Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Outbreak in a Captive Facility Housing White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus), Bison (Bison bison), Elk (Cervus elaphus), Cattle (Bos taurus), and Goats (Capra hircus) in Colorado, USA. J. Zoo. Wildl. Med. 2010, 41, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niedbalski, W. Bluetongue in Europe and the role of wildlife in the epidemiology of disease. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2015, 18, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rivera, N.A.; Varga, C.; Ruder, M.G.; Dorak, S.J.; Roca, A.L.; Novakofski, J.E.; Mateus-Pinilla, N.E. Bluetongue and Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease in the United States of America at the Wildlife–Livestock Interface. Pathogens 2021, 10, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ries, C.; Vögtlin, A.; Hüssy, D.; Jandt, T.; Gobet, H.; Hilbe, M.; Burgener, C.; Schweizer, L.; Häfliger-Speiser, S.; Beer, M.; et al. Putative Novel Atypical BTV Serotype ‘36’ Identified in Small Ruminants in Switzerland. Viruses 2021, 13, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Caballero-Gómez, J.; Terriza, D.C.; Pujols, J.; Martínez-Nevado, E.; Carbonell, M.D.; Guerra, R.; Recuero, J.; Soriano, P.; Barbero, J.; García-Bocanegra, I. Monitoring of bluetongue virus in zoo animals in Spain, 2007–2019. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 69, 1739–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH). Epizootic Haemorrhagic Disease (Infection with Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus). Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. 2019. Available online: https://www.oie.int/en/standard-setting/terrestrial-manual/access-online/ (accessed on 6 December 2022).
  12. World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH). Bluetongue (Infection with Bluetongue Virus). Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. 2019. Available online: https://www.oie.int/en/standard-setting/terrestris (accessed on 6 December 2022).
  13. Mellor, P.S.; Carpenter, S.; White, D.M. Bluetongue Virus in the Insect Host. Bluetongue: Biology of Animal Infections 2009, 1st ed.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2009; Chapter 14; pp. 295–320. [Google Scholar]
  14. McGregor, B.L.; Erram, D.; Alto, B.W.; Lednicky, J.A.; Wisely, S.M.; Burkett-Cadena, N.D. Vector Competence of Florida Culicoides insignis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) for Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus Serotype-2. Viruses 2021, 13, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Santarém, M.C.; Felippe-Bauer, M.L. Brazilian Species of Biting Midges—Espécies de Maruins do Brasil (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae); Fundação Oswaldo Cruz: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021; Available online: https://portal.fiocruz.br/sites/portal (accessed on 6 December 2022).
  16. Mellor, P.S.; Boorman, J.; Baylis, M. Culicoides biting midges: Their role as arbovirus vectors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2000, 45, 307–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maclachlan, N.J.; Drew, C.P.; Darpel, K.E.; Worwa, G. The pathology and pathogenesis of bluetongue. J. Comp. Pathol. 2009, 141, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stallknecht, D.E.; Howerth, E.W. Epidemiology of bluetongue and epizootic haemorrhagic disease in wildlife: Surveillance methods. Vet. Ital. 2004, 40, 203–207. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA). Instrução Normativa nº 50, de 24 de Setembro de 2013; MAPA: Brasília, Brazil, 2013. Available online: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/sanidade-animal-e-vegetal/saude-animal/programas-de-saude-animal/sanidade-suidea/legislacao-suideos/2013IN50de24desetembrode.pdf/view (accessed on 6 December 2022).
  20. Favero, C.M.; Matos, A.C.D.; Campos, F.S.; Cândido, M.V.; Costa, E.A.; Heinemann, M.B.; Barbosa-Stancioli, E.F.; Lobato, Z.I.P. Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease in Brocket Deer, Brazil. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 346–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lobato, Z.I.P.; Guedes, M.I.M.C.; Matos, A.C.D. Bluetongue and other orbiviruses in South America: Gaps and challenges. Vet. Ital. 2015, 51, 253–262. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lima, P.A.; Utiumi, K.U.; Yumi, K.; Biihrer, N.R.; Albuquerque, A.S.; Rezende, F.S.; Matos, A.C.D.; Lobato, Z.I.P.; Peconick, D.D.A.P.; Varaschin, M.S.; et al. Diagnoses of ovine infection by the serotype-4 bluetongue virus on Minas Gerais, Brazil. Acta Sci. Vet. 2016, 44, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Matos, A.C.D.; Rosa, J.C.C.; Nomikou, K.; Guimarães, L.L.B.; Costa, E.A.; Guedes, M.I.M.C.; Driemeier, D.; Lobato, Z.I.P.; Mertens, P.P.C. Genome sequence of Bluetongue virus serotype 17 isolated in Brazil in 2014. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, e01161-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Baldini, M.H.M.; Rosa, J.C.C.; Matos, A.C.D.; Cubas, Z.S.; Guedes, M.I.M.C.; De Moraes, W.; Oliveira, M.J.; Felippi, D.A.; Lobato, Z.I.P.; De Moraes, A.N. Multiple bluetongue virus serotypes causing death in Brazilian dwarf brocket deer (Mazama nana) in Brazil, 2015–2016. Vet. Microbiol. 2018, 227, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kawanami, A.E.; De Oliveira, J.P.; Arenales, A.; Crossley, B.; Woods, L.W.; Duarte, J.M.B.; Werther, K. Detection of bluetongue virus in Brazilian Cervids in São Paulo state. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2018, 38, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Da Silva, T.G.; Lima, M.S.; Spedicato, M.; Carmine, I.; Teodori, L.; Leone, A.; Martins, M.S.N.; Buchala, F.G.; Hellwig, K.S.; Romaldini, A.H.C.N.E.S.; et al. Prevalence and risk factors for bluetongue in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Vet. Med. Sci. 2018, 4, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Holwerda, M.; Santman-Berends, I.; Harders, F.; Engelsma, M.Y.; Vloet, R.; Dijkstra, E.; Van Gennip, R.; Mars, J.; Spierenburg, M.; Roos, L.; et al. Emergence of bluetongue virus serotype 3 in the Netherlands in September 2023. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Caixeta, E.A. Estudo do Vírus da Língua azul (BTV) e Vírus da Doença Epizoótica Hemorrágica (EHDV) em Ungulados do Jardim Zoológico da Fundação de Parques Municipais e Zoobotânica de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Master’s Thesis, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Graduate Program in Animal Science, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2023. Available online: https://repositorio.ufmg.br/handle/1843/57537 (accessed on 13 December 2023).
  29. Harrup, L.E. The Pirbright Institute Culicoides DNA Barcoding Protocols, Version 3, 3rd ed.; The Pirbright Institute: Pirbright, Woking, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Farias, E.S. Efeito Antrópico na Diversidade de Maruins (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) em Uma Área de Assentamento Rural na Amazônia; 71 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Saúde, Sociedade e Endemias da Amazônia) 2014—Instituto Leônidas e Maria Deane, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; Universidade Federal do Amazonas: Manaus, Brazil, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  31. Castellón, E.G.; Veras, R.S. Maruins (Culicoides: Ceratopogonidae) na Amazônia Brasileira; Editora INPA: Manaus, Brazil, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  32. Farias, E.S.; Almeida, J.F.; Pessoa, F.A.C. List of Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the state of Amazonas, Brazil, including new records. Check List 2016, 12, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Borkent, A.; Dominiak, P. Catalog of the biting midges of the world (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Zootaxa 2020, 4787, 1–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rios, R.R.S.; Santarém, M.C.A.; Ribeiro Júnior, K.A.L.; De Melo, B.A.; Da Silva, S.G.M.; Da Silva, N.C.; Dos Santos, V.R.V.; Dos Santos, J.M.; Santana, A.E.G.; Fraga, A.B. Culicoides insignis Lutz, 1913 (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) Biting Midges in Northeast of Brazil. Insects 2021, 12, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Carvalho, L.P.C.; Júnior, A.M.P.; De Paulo, P.F.M.; Silva, G.S.; Costa, G.S.; Freitas, M.T.S.; Pessoa, F.A.C.; Medeiros, J.F. DNA-based blood meal analysis of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) species from Jamari National Forest, Southwestern Amazon, Brazil. Acta Trop. 2021, 221, 106025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sailleau, C.; Zanella, G.; Breard, E.; Viarouge, C.; Desprat, A.; Vitour, D.; Adam, M.; Lasne, L.; Martrenchar, A.; Bakkali-Kassimi, L.; et al. Co-circulation of bluetongue and epizootic haemorrhagic disease viruses in cattle in Reunion Island. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 155, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Viarouge, C.; Lancelot, R.; Rives, G.; Bréard, E.; Miller, M.; Baudrimont, X.; Doceul, V.; Vitour, D.; Zientara, S.; Sailleau, C. Identification of bluetongue virus and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus serotypes in French Guiana in 2011 and 2012. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 174, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Laender, J.O.; Ribeiro, E.S.; Gouveia, A.M.G.; Lobato, Z.I.P.; Felippe-Bauer, M.L.F. Levantamento das espécies de Culicoides latreille, 1809 (diptera: Ceratopogonidae) encontradas nas mesorregiões norte de minas, jequitinhonha e vale do mucuri, minas gerais, brasil. Entomol. Vect. 2004, 11, 145–157. [Google Scholar]
  39. Carvalho, L.P.C.; Silva, F.S. Seasonal abundance of livestock-associated Culicoides species in northeastern Brazil. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2014, 28, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Smith, K.E.; Stallknecht, D.E. Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) collected during epizootics of hemorrhagic disease among captive white-tailed deer. J. Med. Entomol. 1996, 33, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mullen, G.R.; Hayes, M.E.; Nusbaum, K.E. Potential vectors of bluetongue and epizootic hemorrhagic disease viruses of cattle and white-tailed deer in Alabama. Prog. Clin. Biol. 1985, 178, 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mullen, G.R.; Jones, R.H.; Braverman, Y.; Nusbaum, K.E. Laboratory infections of Culicoides debilipalpis and C. stellifer (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) with bluetongue virus. Prog. Clin. Biol. 1984, 178, 239–243. [Google Scholar]
  43. Becker, M.E.; Roberts, J.; Schroeder, M.E.; Gentry, G.; Foil, L.D. Prospective study of epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus and bluetongue virus transmission in captive ruminants. J. Med. Entomol. 2020, 57, 1277–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mcgregor, B.L.; Shults, P.T.; Mcdermott, E.G. A Review of the Vector Status of North American Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) for Bluetongue Virus, Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus, and Other Arboviruses of Concern. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2022, 9, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Becker, M.E.; Reeves, W.K.; Dejean, S.K.; Emery, M.P.; Ostlund, E.N.; Foil, L.D. Detection of bluetongue virus RNA in field-collected Culicoides spp. (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) following the discovery of bluetongue virus serotype 1 in white-tailed deer and cattle in Louisiana. J. Med. Entomol. 2010, 47, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mcgregor, B.L.; Stenn, T.; Sayler, K.A.; Blosser, E.M.; Blackburn, J.K.; Wisely, S.M.; Burkett-Cadena, N.D. Host use patterns of Culicoides spp. biting midges at a big game preserve in Florida, U.S.A., and implications for the transmission of orbiviruses. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2019, 33, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. England, M.E.; Pearce-Kelly, P.; Brugman, V.A.; King, S.; Gubbins, S.; Sach, F.; Sanders, C.J.; Masters, N.J.; Denison, E.; Carpenter, S. Culicoides species composition and molecular identification of host blood meals at two zoos in the UK. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Labuschagne, K.; Gerber, L.J.; Espie, I.; Carpenter, S. Culicoides biting midges at the National Zoological Gardens of South Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2007, 74, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Gusmão, G.M.C.; Lorosa, E.S.; Brito, G.A.; Moraes, L.S.; Bastos, V.J.C.; Rebelo, J.M.M. Determinação das fontes de repasto sanguíneo de Culicoides Latreille (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) em áreas rurais do norte do estado do Maranhão, Brasil. Biotemas 2015, 28, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Snyman, J.; Snyman, L.P.; Labuschagne, K.; Venter, G.J.; Venter, M. The utilisation of CytB and COI barcodes for the identification of bloodmeals and Culicoides species (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) reveals a variety of novel wildlife hosts in South Africa. Acta Trop. 2021, 219, 105913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Corrêa, T.G.; Ferreira, J.M.; Riet-Correa, G.; Ruas, J.L.; Schild, A.L.; Riet-Correa, F.; Guimarães, A.; Felippe-Bauer, M.L. Seasonal allergic dermatitis in sheep in southern Brazil caused by Culicoides insignis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 145, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ducheyne, E.; De Denken, R.; Becu, S.; Codina, B.; Nomikou, K.; Mangana, O.; Georgiev, G.; Purse, B.V.; Hendrickx, G. Quitifying the wind dispersal of Culicoides species in Greece and Bulgaria. Geospat. Health 2007, 2, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Santiago-Alarcon, D.; Havelka, P.; Pineda, E.; Segelbacher, G.; Schaefer, H.M. Urban forests as hubs for novel zoonosis: Blood meal analysis, seasonal variation in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) vectors, and avian haemosporidians. Parasitology 2013, 140, 1799–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hopken, M.W.; Ryan, B.M.; Huyvaert, K.P.; Piaggio, A.J. Picky eaters are rare: DNA-based blood meal analysis of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) species from the United States. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Veronesi, E.; Venter, G.J.; Labuschagne, K.; Mellor, P.S.; Carpenter, S. Life-history parameters of Culicoides (Avaritia) imicola Kieffer in the laboratory at different rearing temperatures. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 163, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Baldet, T.; Delecolle, J.C.; Cetre-Sossah, C.; Mathieu, B.; Meiswinkel, R.; Gerbier, G. Indoor activity of Culicoides associated with livestock in the bluetongue virus (BTV) affected region of northern France during autumn 2006. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 87, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vilar, M.J.; Guis, H.; Krzywinski, J.; Sanderson, S.; Baylis, M. Culicoides vectors of bluetongue virus in Chester Zoo. Vet. Rec. 2011, 168, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Nelder, M.P.; Swanson, D.A.; Adler, P.H.; Grogan, W.L. Biting midges of the genus Culicoides in South Carolina zoos. J. Insect Sci. 2010, 10, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Schulz, C.; Eschbaumer, M.; Rudolf, M.; König, P.; Keller, M.; Bauer, C.; Gauly, M.; Grevelding, G.C.; Beer, M.; Hoffmann, B. Experimental infection of South American camelids with bluetongue virus serotype 8. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 154, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. House, J.A.; Groocock, C.M.; Campbell, C.H. Antibodies to Bluetongue Viruses in Animals Imported into United States Zoological Gardens. Can. J. Comp. Med. 1982, 46, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Hamblin, C.; Anderson, E.C.; Jago, M.; Mlengeya, T.; Hirji, K. Antibodies to some pathogenic agents in free-living wild species in Tanzania. Epidemiol. Infect. Vol. 2009, 105, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Fernandes-Santos, R.C.; Medici, E.P.; Testa-José, C.; Micheletti, T. Health assessment of wild Lowland Tapirs (Tapirus Terrestris) in the highly threatened Cerrado biome, Brazil. J. Wildl. Dis. 2020, 56, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Varela, D.; Flesher, K.; Cartes, J.L.; De Bustos, S.; Chalukian, S.; Ayala, G.; Richard-Hansen, C. Tapirus terrestris . IUCN Red List Threat. Species 2019, 2019, T21474A45174127. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Results of the identified sequences of Cyt b from blood meal of different Culicoides spp.
Table 1. Results of the identified sequences of Cyt b from blood meal of different Culicoides spp.
Culicoides spp. Identified Host Species
Culicoides insignisRed deer (Cervus elaphus), European Fallow Deer (Dama dama), Chital (Axis axis), Sambar deer (Cervus unicolor), Human (Homo sapiens), Red Collared Dove (Streptopelia tranquebarica), Iranian lizard (Agamura kermansis), Amazonian fish (Teleocichla mindanensis), Brown creeper (Certhia americana)
Culicoides debilipalpisAfrican bush elephant (Loxodonta Africana), Human (Homo sapiens), South American Tapir (Tapirus terrestris)
Culicoides pusillusHuman (Homo sapiens)
Table 2. Results of the AGID test for BTV and EHDV by species using serum samples collected in FPMZB-BH from 2012 to 2023.
Table 2. Results of the AGID test for BTV and EHDV by species using serum samples collected in FPMZB-BH from 2012 to 2023.
SpeciesBTV AGID ResultsEHDV AGID Results
Common NameScientific NamePositiveNegativeTotalPositiveNegativeTotal
African Bush ElephantLoxodonta africana101011
Bactrian CamelCamelus bactrianus235055
Brown BrocketSubulo gouazoubira94134711
Common ElandTaurotragus oryx101011
Common HippopotamusHippopotamus amphibiu011011
European Fallow DeerDama dama1711821113
GemsbokOryx gazella909336
LlamaLama glama516156
Marsh DeerBlastocerus dichotomus101011
Plains ZebraEquus quagga022022
Red DeerCervus elaphus606145
South American TapirTapirus terrestris235055
WaterbuckKobus ellipsiprymnus112011
White RhinocerosCeratotherium simum022011
Total541872114859 *
* Thirteen samples (five European Fallow Deer, one Red Deer, one Waterbuck, three Gemsbok, one White Rhinoceros, and two Brown Brocket) were not tested for EHDV due to insufficient volume.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caixeta, E.A.; Pinheiro, M.A.; Lucchesi, V.S.; Oliveira, A.G.G.; Galinari, G.C.F.; Tinoco, H.P.; Coelho, C.M.; Lobato, Z.I.P. The Study of Bluetongue Virus (BTV) and Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus (EHDV) Circulation and Vectors at the Municipal Parks and Zoobotanical Foundation of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil (FPMZB-BH). Viruses 2024, 16, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16020293

AMA Style

Caixeta EA, Pinheiro MA, Lucchesi VS, Oliveira AGG, Galinari GCF, Tinoco HP, Coelho CM, Lobato ZIP. The Study of Bluetongue Virus (BTV) and Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus (EHDV) Circulation and Vectors at the Municipal Parks and Zoobotanical Foundation of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil (FPMZB-BH). Viruses. 2024; 16(2):293. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16020293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caixeta, Eduardo Alves, Mariana Andrioli Pinheiro, Victoria Souza Lucchesi, Anna Gabriella Guimarães Oliveira, Grazielle Cossenzo Florentino Galinari, Herlandes Penha Tinoco, Carlyle Mendes Coelho, and Zélia Inês Portela Lobato. 2024. "The Study of Bluetongue Virus (BTV) and Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus (EHDV) Circulation and Vectors at the Municipal Parks and Zoobotanical Foundation of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil (FPMZB-BH)" Viruses 16, no. 2: 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16020293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop