Evolving Protected-Area Impacts in Mexico: Political Shifts as Suggested by Impact Evaluations
AbstractFor protected areas (PAs), variation in forest impacts over space—including types of PA—are increasingly well documented, while shifts in impacts over time receive less attention. For Mexico, in the 1990s, PAs effectively were ‘paper parks’. Thus, achieving impacts on the forest would require shifts over time in the politics of PA siting and PA implementation. We rigorously analyze the impacts of Mexican PAs on 2000–2005 loss of natural land cover, using matching to reduce location bias caused by typical land-use economics and politics. We find a 3.2% lower loss, on average, due to PAs. Since politics often vary by type of PA, we also show that in Mexico stricter PAs are closer to cities and have greater impact than mixed-use PAs. These shifts in impacts suggest some potential for PAs to conserve forests. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
PDF-Document (PDF, 630 KB)
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Pfaff, A.; Santiago-Ávila, F.; Joppa, L. Evolving Protected-Area Impacts in Mexico: Political Shifts as Suggested by Impact Evaluations. Forests 2017, 8, 17.
Pfaff A, Santiago-Ávila F, Joppa L. Evolving Protected-Area Impacts in Mexico: Political Shifts as Suggested by Impact Evaluations. Forests. 2017; 8(1):17.Chicago/Turabian Style
Pfaff, Alexander; Santiago-Ávila, Francisco; Joppa, Lucas. 2017. "Evolving Protected-Area Impacts in Mexico: Political Shifts as Suggested by Impact Evaluations." Forests 8, no. 1: 17.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.