Next Article in Journal
Estimation of Nutrient Exports Resulting from Thinning and Intensive Biomass Extraction in Medium-Aged Spruce and Pine Stands in Saxony, Northeast Germany
Next Article in Special Issue
A Dominant Voice amidst Not Enough People: Analysing the Legitimacy of Mexico’s REDD+ Readiness Process
Previous Article in Journal
Drought Stress Distribution Responses of Continental Beech Forests at their Xeric Edge in Central Europe
Previous Article in Special Issue
Governance Values in the Climate Change Regime: Stakeholder Perceptions of REDD+ Legitimacy at the National Level
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2016, 7(12), 300; doi:10.3390/f7120300

Transforming Justice in REDD+ through a Politics of Difference Approach

Department of Political Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Academic Editors: Esteve Corbera and Heike Schroeder
Received: 30 September 2016 / Revised: 7 November 2016 / Accepted: 22 November 2016 / Published: 30 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue REDD+: Politics, Interplays and Impacts)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [699 KB, uploaded 30 November 2016]

Abstract

Since Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation “Plus” (REDD+) starting gaining traction in the UN climate negotiations in 2007, its architects and scholars have grappled with its community-level justice implications. On the one hand, supporters argue that REDD+ will help the environment and forest-dependent communities by generating payments for forest carbon services from industrialized countries seeking lower cost emissions reductions. Critics, by contrast, increasingly argue that REDD+ is a new form of colonization through capitalism, producing injustice by stripping forest communities of their rights, denying them capabilities for wellbeing, and rendering forest peoples voiceless in forest governance. This paper argues that current REDD+ debates are too focused on relatively simple visions of either distributive or procedural justice, and pay too little attention to the core recognitional justice concerns of REDD+ critics, namely questions of what values, worldviews, rights, and identities are privileged or displaced in the emergence, design, and implementation of REDD+ and with what effects. This paper examines the tensions that emerge when designing institutions to promote multi-scalar, multivalent justice in REDD+ to ask: what are the justice demands that REDD+ architects face when designing REDD+ institutions? Complexifying the concepts of justice as deployed in the debates on REDD+ can illuminate the possibilities for a diversity of alternative perspectives to generate new institutional design ideas for REDD+. View Full-Text
Keywords: REDD+; justice; institutions; forest peoples REDD+; justice; institutions; forest peoples
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Marion Suiseeya, K.R. Transforming Justice in REDD+ through a Politics of Difference Approach. Forests 2016, 7, 300.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top