Next Article in Journal
Evaluations of Landscape Locations along Trails Based on Walking Experiences and Distances Traveled in the Akasawa Forest Therapy Base, Central Japan
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen Nutrition of Trees in Temperate Forests—The Significance of Nitrogen Availability in the Pedosphere and Atmosphere
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2015, 6(8), 2836-2852;

Assessing Douglas-Fir Seedling Establishment Using Two Modified Forestry Reclamation Approaches in the Pacific Northwest

School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100, USA
Gonzaga University School of Law, 721 North Cincinnati Street, Spokane, WA 99202, USA
Arid Lands Resource Sciences, Graduate Interdisciplinary Program, University of Arizona, 1604 East Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Eric J. Jokela
Received: 3 July 2015 / Revised: 6 August 2015 / Accepted: 17 August 2015 / Published: 21 August 2015
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [808 KB, uploaded 24 August 2015]   |  


The Forestry Reclamation Approach uses uncompacted, mounded spoils to reforest mined-land and has been successful in hardwood forests in the Appalachian region. A surface coalmine reclamation site in the Pacific Northwest was used to compare the site’s standard reclamation approach (Reference) with a modified version of the Forestry Reclamation Approach (FRA) along with a modified FRA treatment that also incorporated an amendment of bottom ash from the coal burning power plant on-site (FRA + Ash). Survival and growth were followed for three growing seasons in bareroot and container Douglas-fir seedlings. Soil characteristics and understory cover were also assessed. Considerable variation in microsite characteristics was observed in the study area. Container seedlings did not improve survival compared to bareroot seedlings. In the soil reclamation treatments, seedling survival was significantly higher in FRA + Ash treatments compared to FRA and Reference treatments at the end of the second growing season. Survival declined in each year of the study, but the order of treatment effectiveness did not change. Relativized growth increment was significantly higher in the FRA treatment compared to both the Reference and FRA + Ash treatments during the third growing season. Understory cover was established after three years, but varied substantially across the study area. View Full-Text
Keywords: soil reclamation; seedling survival; ash amendment soil reclamation; seedling survival; ash amendment

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Miller, C.; King, G.; Liu, Y.; Harrison, R.; Turnblom, E.; Zabowski, D. Assessing Douglas-Fir Seedling Establishment Using Two Modified Forestry Reclamation Approaches in the Pacific Northwest. Forests 2015, 6, 2836-2852.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top