Next Article in Journal
Large-Scale Mapping of Carbon Stocks in Riparian Forests with Self-Organizing Maps and the k-Nearest-Neighbor Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Options for a National Framework for Benefit Distribution and Their Relation to Community-Based and National REDD+ Monitoring
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2014, 5(7), 1618-1634; doi:10.3390/f5071618

A Quantitative Index of Forest Structural Sustainability

Department of Environmental & Forest Biology, College of Environmental Science & Forestry (SUNY-ESF), State University of New York, 1 Forestry Drive Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
Department of Forest & Natural Resources Management, SUNY-ESF, 1 Forestry Drive Syracuse 13210, NY, USA
Department of Computer Science, Watson School of Engineering, State University of New York at Binghamton, 4400 Vestal Parkway East, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 11 March 2014 / Revised: 5 June 2014 / Accepted: 30 June 2014 / Published: 9 July 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [506 KB, 14 July 2014; original version 9 July 2014]   |  


Forest health is a complex concept including many ecosystem functions, interactions and values. We develop a quantitative system applicable to many forest types to assess tree mortality with respect to stable forest structure and composition. We quantify impacts of observed tree mortality on structure by comparison to baseline mortality, and then develop a system that distinguishes between structurally stable and unstable forests. An empirical multivariate index of structural sustainability and a threshold value (70.6) derived from 22 nontropical tree species’ datasets differentiated structurally sustainable from unsustainable diameter distributions. Twelve of 22 species populations were sustainable with a mean score of 33.2 (median = 27.6). Ten species populations were unsustainable with a mean score of 142.6 (median = 130.1). Among them, Fagus grandifolia, Pinus lambertiana, P. ponderosa, and Nothofagus solandri were attributable to known disturbances; whereas the unsustainability of Abies balsamea, Acer rubrum, Calocedrus decurrens, Picea engelmannii, P. rubens, and Prunus serotina populations were not. This approach provides the ecological framework for rational management decisions using routine inventory data to objectively: determine scope and direction of change in structure and composition, assess excessive or insufficient mortality, compare disturbance impacts in time and space, and prioritize management needs and allocation of scarce resources. View Full-Text
Keywords: baseline mortality; climate change; forest health; invasive species baseline mortality; climate change; forest health; invasive species
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cale, J.A.; Teale, S.A.; West, J.L.; Zhang, L.I.; Castello, D.R.; Devlin, P.; Castello, J.D. A Quantitative Index of Forest Structural Sustainability. Forests 2014, 5, 1618-1634.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top