Next Article in Journal
A Quantitative Index of Forest Structural Sustainability
Next Article in Special Issue
Potential for Integrating Community-Based Monitoring into REDD+
Previous Article in Journal
Methods for Rapid Screening in Woody Plant Herbicide Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Small Drones for Community-Based Forest Monitoring: An Assessment of Their Feasibility and Potential in Tropical Areas
Forests 2014, 5(7), 1596-1617; doi:10.3390/f5071596
Article

Options for a National Framework for Benefit Distribution and Their Relation to Community-Based and National REDD+ Monitoring

1,2,* , 3
, 4
, 5
, 6
, 7
 and 1,2
Received: 2 April 2014; in revised form: 17 June 2014 / Accepted: 23 June 2014 / Published: 8 July 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [339 KB, updated 10 July 2014; original version uploaded 8 July 2014]   |   Browse Figure
Abstract: Monitoring is a central element in the implementation of national REDD+ and may be essential in providing the data needed to support benefit distribution. We discuss the options for benefit sharing systems in terms of technical feasibility and political acceptability in respect of equity considerations, and the kind of data that would be needed for the different options. We contrast output-based distribution systems, in which rewards are distributed according to performance measured in terms of carbon impacts, with input-based systems in which performance is measured in term of compliance with prescribed REDD+ activities. Output-based systems, which would require regular community carbon inventories to produce Tier 3 data locally, face various challenges particularly for the case of assessing avoided deforestation, and they may not be perceived as equitable. Input-based systems would require data on activities undertaken rather than change in stocks; this information could come from community-acquired data. We also consider how community monitored data could support national forest monitoring systems and the further development of national REDD+.
Keywords: benefit sharing; input-based distribution; output based distribution; equity; community monitoring; link to national MRV benefit sharing; input-based distribution; output based distribution; equity; community monitoring; link to national MRV
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Skutsch, M.; Turnhout, E.; Vijge, M.J.; Herold, M.; Wits, T.; den Besten, J.W.; Torres, A.B. Options for a National Framework for Benefit Distribution and Their Relation to Community-Based and National REDD+ Monitoring. Forests 2014, 5, 1596-1617.

AMA Style

Skutsch M, Turnhout E, Vijge MJ, Herold M, Wits T, den Besten JW, Torres AB. Options for a National Framework for Benefit Distribution and Their Relation to Community-Based and National REDD+ Monitoring. Forests. 2014; 5(7):1596-1617.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skutsch, Margaret; Turnhout, Esther; Vijge, Marjanneke J.; Herold, Martin; Wits, Tjeerd; den Besten, Jan W.; Torres, Arturo B. 2014. "Options for a National Framework for Benefit Distribution and Their Relation to Community-Based and National REDD+ Monitoring." Forests 5, no. 7: 1596-1617.


Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert