Next Article in Journal
Commercializing Biorefinery Technology: A Case for the Multi-Product Pathway to a Viable Biorefinery
Next Article in Special Issue
An Ecosystem Approach to Recreation Location Quotients
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Potential Trade-Offs Between Nature-Based Tourism and Forestry, a Case Study in Northern Finland
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2011, 2(4), 913-928; doi:10.3390/f2040913

Best Practices for Tourism Concessions in Protected Areas: A Review of the Field

Department of Environment and Society, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322–5210, USA
Center for Protected Area Management and Training, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523–1480, USA
Conservation International, Arlington, VA 22202–3787, USA
School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611–0410, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 11 October 2011 / Accepted: 21 October 2011 / Published: 2 November 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Expanding Forests’ Benefits: Forest-based Recreation and Tourism)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [76 KB, uploaded 2 November 2011]


Despite the importance of protected areas (PAs) worldwide to protect biodiversity, reduce poverty and promote sustainable development, throughout the world governments struggle to adequately fund PAs to meet conservation goals. Tourism is seen as a viable financial option for PAs, with tourism concessions through private sector partnerships gaining momentum that allows the overarching goal of preservation and conservation to remain with the state. However, without appropriate planning or best practices in place, tourism concessions can lead to such problems as waste, habitat destruction and the displacement of local people and wildlife. We analyzed tourism concession agreements in government documents from 22 countries to provide an overview of what best practices for tourism concessions are being established and what practices might need to be better incorporated into agreements. The greatest weaknesses of best practices appear to be with concession qualifications, legal, and financial responsibilities, while the strengths included environmental and empowerment/social responsibilities. This initial assessment of contract components will provide a baseline to further develop best practices and assist protected area managers, local communities, and conservation practitioners working with tourism in PAs to ensure that tourism has a positive impact on protected area management.
Keywords: best practices; protected areas; tourism concessions best practices; protected areas; tourism concessions
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Wyman, M.; Barborak, J.R.; Inamdar, N.; Stein, T. Best Practices for Tourism Concessions in Protected Areas: A Review of the Field. Forests 2011, 2, 913-928.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top