Next Article in Journal
Simulation of the Effect of Intensive Forest Management on Forest Production in Sweden
Next Article in Special Issue
Indigenous Territories and REDD in Latin America: Opportunity or Threat?
Previous Article in Journal
Old-growth Forests: Anatomy of a Wicked Problem
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rights to Land, Forests and Carbon in REDD+: Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2011, 2(1), 357-372; doi:10.3390/f2010357

REDD+, RFM, Development, and Carbon Markets

Climate Change Program, Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, 30501 Turrialba, Cartago, Costa Rica
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 December 2010 / Revised: 5 February 2011 / Accepted: 18 February 2011 / Published: 2 March 2011
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [338 KB, uploaded 2 March 2011]   |  

Abstract

Combining responsible forest management (RFM) experiences with literature reviews and stakeholder discussions allows an assessment of the potential role of RFM in reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and conservation, sustainable forest management and enhancement of carbon stocks (REDD+). RFM contributes to greater carbon storage and biodiversity in forest biomass in comparison to conventional logging and deforestation. Using an adjusted von Thünen model to explain land user behavior in relation to different variables, considering a general forest transition curve and looking at a potential relation between governance and deforestation rates, the authors conclude that reduction of deforestation and forest degradation can only be achieved by a combined approach of increasing forest rent relative to other land uses and reducing transaction costs for forest management and conservation. More than providing an additional income for a privileged few, REDD+ will need to address the barriers that have been identified in RFM over the past 30 years of investment in forest management and conservation. Most of these are of an institutional nature, but also culture and social organization as well as locally specific development trends play a significant role in increasing the potential for application of RFM and REDD+.
Keywords: net present value; transaction costs; governance net present value; transaction costs; governance
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Louman, B.; Cifuentes, M.; Chacón, M. REDD+, RFM, Development, and Carbon Markets. Forests 2011, 2, 357-372.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top