Abstract: This research explores the intersection between the various federal and state forestry incentive programs and the adoption of sustainable forestry practices on non-industrial private forest (NIPF) lands in the US. The qualitative research reported here draws upon a series of eight focus groups of NIPF landowners (two each in Minnesota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina). Despite minor regional variations, the dominant theme that emerged is that these landowners’ purchase and management decisions are motivated by the “trilogy” of forest continuity, benefit to the owner, and doing the “right thing.” This trilogy is quite consistent with notions of sustainable forestry, but somewhat more at odds with the objectives of many financial incentive programs, as well as specific tactics such as third-party certification. A series of policy recommendations that emerge from this research is presented.
Keywords: land management policies; non-industrial private forests; focus groups; sustainable forestry
This is an open access article distributed under the
Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Export to BibTeX
MDPI and ACS Style
Daniels, S.E.; Kilgore, M.A.; Jacobson, M.G.; Greene, J.L.; Straka, T.J. Examining the Compatibility between Forestry Incentive Programs in the US and the Practice of Sustainable Forest Management. Forests 2010, 1, 49-64.
Daniels SE, Kilgore MA, Jacobson MG, Greene JL, Straka TJ. Examining the Compatibility between Forestry Incentive Programs in the US and the Practice of Sustainable Forest Management. Forests. 2010; 1(1):49-64.
Daniels, Steven E.; Kilgore, Michael A.; Jacobson, Michael G.; Greene, John L.; Straka, Thomas J. 2010. "Examining the Compatibility between Forestry Incentive Programs in the US and the Practice of Sustainable Forest Management." Forests 1, no. 1: 49-64.