Forests 2010, 1(1), 49-64; doi:10.3390/f1010049
Article

Examining the Compatibility between Forestry Incentive Programs in the US and the Practice of Sustainable Forest Management

1 Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology, Utah State University, 216C Old Main Hall, Logan, UT 84322-0730, USA 2 Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, 301K Green Hall, 1530 Cleveland Ave. N., St. Paul, MN 55108-6112, USA 3 School of Forest Resources, The Pennsylvania State University, 309 Forest Resources Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA 4 Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 12254, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA 5 Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, Box 340317, Clemson, SC 29634-0317, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 December 2009; in revised form: 12 March 2010 / Accepted: 16 March 2010 / Published: 23 March 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [62 KB, uploaded 23 March 2010 14:23 CET]
Abstract: This research explores the intersection between the various federal and state forestry incentive programs and the adoption of sustainable forestry practices on non-industrial private forest (NIPF) lands in the US. The qualitative research reported here draws upon a series of eight focus groups of NIPF landowners (two each in Minnesota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina). Despite minor regional variations, the dominant theme that emerged is that these landowners’ purchase and management decisions are motivated by the “trilogy” of forest continuity, benefit to the owner, and doing the “right thing.” This trilogy is quite consistent with notions of sustainable forestry, but somewhat more at odds with the objectives of many financial incentive programs, as well as specific tactics such as third-party certification. A series of policy recommendations that emerge from this research is presented.
Keywords: land management policies; non-industrial private forests; focus groups; sustainable forestry

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Daniels, S.E.; Kilgore, M.A.; Jacobson, M.G.; Greene, J.L.; Straka, T.J. Examining the Compatibility between Forestry Incentive Programs in the US and the Practice of Sustainable Forest Management. Forests 2010, 1, 49-64.

AMA Style

Daniels SE, Kilgore MA, Jacobson MG, Greene JL, Straka TJ. Examining the Compatibility between Forestry Incentive Programs in the US and the Practice of Sustainable Forest Management. Forests. 2010; 1(1):49-64.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Daniels, Steven E.; Kilgore, Michael A.; Jacobson, Michael G.; Greene, John L.; Straka, Thomas J. 2010. "Examining the Compatibility between Forestry Incentive Programs in the US and the Practice of Sustainable Forest Management." Forests 1, no. 1: 49-64.

Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert