Next Article in Journal
Crystal Structures and Mechanical Properties of Ca2C at High Pressure
Previous Article in Journal
Pickering Emulsion-Based Marbles for Cellular Capsules
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Design and Experimental Investigation of a Novel Pneumatic Conveying Method to Disperse Natural Fibers in Thermoset Polymers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/ma9070573
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Residual Tensile Property of Plain Woven Jute Fiber/Poly(Lactic Acid) Green Composites during Thermal Cycling

by
Hideaki Katogi
*,
Kenichi Takemura
and
Motoki Akiyama
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kanagawa University, 3-27-1 Rokkakubashi, Kanagawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 221-8686, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(7), 573; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070573
Submission received: 23 March 2016 / Revised: 30 June 2016 / Accepted: 11 July 2016 / Published: 14 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bio- and Natural-Fiber Composites)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study investigated the residual tensile properties of plain woven jute fiber reinforced poly(lactic acid) (PLA) during thermal cycling. Temperature ranges of thermal cycling tests were 35–45 °C and 35–55 °C. The maximum number of cycles was 103 cycles. The quasi-static tensile tests of jute fiber, PLA, and composite were conducted after thermal cycling tests. Thermal mechanical analyses of jute fiber and PLA were conducted after thermal cycling tests. Results led to the following conclusions. For temperatures of 35–45 °C, tensile strength of composite at 103 cycles decreased 10% compared to that of composite at 0 cycles. For temperatures of 35–55 °C, tensile strength and Young’s modulus of composite at 103 cycles decreased 15% and 10%, respectively, compared to that of composite at 0 cycles. Tensile properties and the coefficient of linear expansion of PLA and jute fiber remained almost unchanged after thermal cycling tests. From observation of a fracture surface, the length of fiber pull out in the fracture surface of composite at 103 cycles was longer than that of composite at 0 cycles. Therefore, tensile properties of the composite during thermal cycling were decreased, probably because of the decrease of interfacial adhesion between the fiber and resin.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Interior components of scrap vehicles have been recycled to comply with end-of-life vehicle recycling laws in Europe [1] and Japan [2]. However, the interior components of scrap vehicles, which are produced using petroleum-based resin, present great difficulty for recycling. Therefore, green composites [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] are being emphasized for use as new generation components of vehicles. Green composites are fabricated using natural fiber and biodegradable polymer resin. Among biodegradable polymer resins, poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is mainly used as the matrix. The life cycle assessment of the PLA [11] is smaller than that of petroleum resins such as polypropylene, polyester, and polyvinyl chloride. The specific Young’s modulus of natural fiber as reinforcement is similar to that of glass fiber. The specific gravity of natural fiber is about 1.4 [3].
Recently, numerous reports have described mechanical properties [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and molding method [21,22,23,24,25] of green composite. Toyota Boshoku Co., Ltd. (Kariya, Aichi, Japan) produced door trim ornaments using the green composite [26]. The interior components of vehicles are used at environmental temperatures. In August 2012 in Japan, the average environmental temperature in vehicles was about 51 °C [27]. Therefore, many reports of the relevant literature describe effects of environmental temperatures on tensile properties of the green composites.
Ben et al. [28] described tensile properties of kenaf fiber reinforced PLA at environmental temperatures. Tensile strength and Young’s modulus of kenaf fiber reinforced PLA under 50 °C decreased 27% and 75%, respectively, compared with those of kenaf fiber reinforced PLA at room temperature (RT). Nassiopoulos et al. [29] reported an effect of environmental temperature on tensile properties of flax fiber reinforced PLA. Tensile strength and Young’s modulus of flax fiber reinforced PLA under 110 °C decreased 62% and 79%, respectively, in comparison with those of flax fiber reinforced PLA under RT. Katogi et al. [30] described some flexural properties of jute fiber reinforced PLA under environmental temperature. Flexural strength and Young’s modulus of jute fiber reinforced PLA under 50 °C decreased 22% and 12%, respectively, in comparison with those of jute fiber reinforced PLA at RT.
Interior components of vehicle are used under thermal cycling that occurs each day. In addition, environmental temperatures related to weather change each day. Effects of thermal cycling on tensile properties of green composites under some temperature ranges should be investigated for long-term use. In Japan and Europe, vehicle inspections must be conducted about once every two years [31]. Therefore, some reports of the literature describe effects of thermal cycling on tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced composites using petroleum resin. Sakiyama et al. [32] reported effects of thermal cycling on tensile properties of jute fiber reinforced polypropylene. For temperatures of −20–80 °C, the Young’s modulus of jute fiber reinforced polypropylene at 20 cycles was lower than that of jute fiber reinforced polypropylene at 0 cycles.
However, few studies have examined the effects of thermal cycling on tensile properties of green composites as a bioresource-based interior component. This study investigated tensile properties of green composites during thermal cycling. Thermal properties and tensile properties of the matrix and reinforcement were also investigated after thermal cycling.

2. Materials and Molding Method

Plain woven jute fiber (1717, Yasuda Co., Ltd., Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan) knitting jute spun yarn was used as reinforcement. PLA (Ecodea 300-1B01DA, Toray Co., Ltd., Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan) was used as the matrix. The molding method of green composites was vacuum compression molding, with temperature and pressure of 190 °C and 1.7 MPa, respectively. The molding time was 10 min. Subsequently, the molding temperature was cooled to RT. The fiber volume fraction of green composites was 40%.
The molding method used for PLA was vacuum compression molding. The molding temperature was 190 °C. The molding pressure was 0.4 MPa. The molding time was 10 min. Subsequently, the molding temperature was cooled to RT.
Jute fiber consists of lignin (12%–13%), hemicellulose (14%–20%), and cellulose (61%–71%) [33]. Elementary fiber bound jute fiber has longitudinal variation in its cross sectional area. The specific gravity of jute fiber is 1.3 [5]. Figure 1 presents a schematic drawing of specimens.

3. Testing Method

3.1. Thermal Cycling Test

Thermal cycling tests of jute fiber, PLA, and green composite were conducted. Temperature ranges of thermal cycling tests were, respectively, 35–45 °C and 35–55 °C. As conditions of temperatures of 35–45 °C, the heating time was 12 min; the cooling time was 12 min. As conditions of temperatures of 35–55 °C, the heating time was 16 min; the cooling time was 16 min. The maximum number of cycles was 103 cycles. Figure 2 shows surface temperatures of the green composite during one thermal cycling. Thermal cycling tests were conducted using a thermocouple and desk-top type high-temperature chamber (ST-120, Espec Co., Ltd., Kita-ku, Osaka, Japan).

3.2. Thermal Mechanical Anaysis

After thermal cycling tests, thermal mechanical analysis of PLA was conducted based on the Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) K 7197 [34]. The PLA specimen was 12 mm long, 5 mm wide and 0.3 mm thick. Thermal mechanical analysis of jute fiber was also conducted after thermal cycling testing. Gauge lengths of jute fiber and PLA were 10 mm. The test load was 0.1 N. The temperature range was 30–160 °C. The heating rate was 5 °C/min. The numbers of specimens for jute fiber and PLA were, respectively, 10 and 5. Thermal mechanical analyses of jute fiber and PLA were conducted using a themomechanical analyzer (TMA-60, Shimazu Co., Ltd., Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan).

3.3. Quasi-Static Tensile Test after Thermal Cycling

After thermal cycling tests, quasi-static tensile tests of PLA and green composite were conducted respectively based on JIS K 7162 [35] and JIS K 7054 [36]. As a condition, the crosshead speed was 1 mm/min. Gauge lengths of PLA and green composite were 25 mm. The environmental temperature was RT. Numbers of specimens for green composite and PLA were, respectively, three. After quasi-static tensile tests, the fracture surface of the green composite was observed using scanning electron microscope (VE-7800, KEYENCE Co., Ltd., Higashiyodogawa-ku, Osaka, Japan).
Quasi-static tensile tests of jute fiber were conducted after thermal cycling tests of 30 specimens. The gauge length was 10 mm. The crosshead speed was 1 mm/min. The environmental temperature was RT. The cross sectional area at break point of jute fiber was estimated by elliptical approximation using a photograph of the jute fiber before quasi-static tensile testing. The tensile strength of jute fiber was calculated using a Weibull distribution. The Young’s modulus of jute fiber was calculated using the cross-sectional area at seven points. Quasi-static tensile tests of jute fiber, PLA, and green composite were conducted using a tensile testing machine (TENSILON RTG-1250A, A & D Co., Ltd., Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Thermal Mechanical Analyses of Jute Fiber amd PLA after Thermal Cycling

Figure 3 shows effects of thermal cycling on the coefficient of linear expansion and softening points of jute fiber and PLA. In cases of temperatures of 35–45 °C and 35–55 °C, the coefficient of linear expansion of jute fiber and PLA at 103 cycles remained almost unchanged in comparison with that of jute fiber and PLA at 0 cycles. Based on their results, coefficients of linear expansions of jute fiber and PLA were unaffected because thermal degradations of jute fiber and PLA did not occur during thermal cycling. The coefficient of linear expansion of jute fiber was 78% lower than that of PLA. Jute fiber consists mainly of cellulose. The coefficient of linear expansion of cellulose was 1.4 × 10−5 [1/°C] [37]. The coefficient of linear expansion of jute fiber was lower than that of PLA because of the cellulose in constituent materials.
In cases of temperatures of 35–45 °C and 35–55 °C, softening points of jute fiber and PLA did not change with an increase in the number of cycles. The softening point of jute fiber was higher than that of PLA. Softening points of lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose in constituent materials of jute fiber are, respectively, 127–235 °C, 167–217 °C, and 231–253 °C [38]. The softening point of jute fiber was affected mainly by the softening point of lignin as its constituent material.

4.2. Tensile Properties of Jute Fiber, PLA, and Green Composite during Thermal Cycling

Figure 4 shows stress-strain curves of green composite and PLA at 0 cycles. The stress-strain curve of the green composite was almost linear. The stress-strain curve of PLA was linear up to strain of 2%. Subsequently the stress-strain curve of PLA decreased slightly until strain 3%. The stress-strain curve of PLA remained almost unchanged at 4% or more. The average tensile strength of green composite and PLA at 0 cycles were, respectively, 79 MPa and 59 MPa. The average Young’s modulus of the green composite and PLA at 0 cycles were, respectively, 9 GPa and 3 GPa.
Figure 5 shows tensile properties of green composite and PLA during thermal cycling. Furthermore, Table 1 shows tensile test results of green composite and PLA. For temperatures of 35–45 °C, the tensile strength of the green composite at one cycle decreased 4% in comparison with that of the green composite at 0 cycles. Subsequently, the tensile strength of green composite decreased gradually with an increased number of cycles. The tensile strength of the green composite at 103 cycles decreased by 10% in comparison with that of the green composite at 0 cycles. Young’s modulus of green composite decreased slightly with an increased number of cycles.
For temperatures of 35–55 °C, the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the green composite at one cycle decreased 9% and 7%, respectively, in comparison with that of green composite at 0 cycles. Subsequently, the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of green composite remained almost unchanged until 102 cycles. Tensile strength and Young’s modulus of green composite at 103 cycles decreased respectively 7% and 6% in comparison with those of green composite at 102 cycles. The tensile strength and Young’ modulus of the green composite at temperatures of 35–55 °C was lower than those of green composite at temperatures of 35–45 °C when thermal cycling tests were conducted until 10 cycles. In the case of 103 cycles, tensile strength and Young’ modulus of green composite at temperatures of 35–55 °C was lower than those of the green composite at temperatures of 35–45 °C.
When thermal cycling tests of PLA were conducted at temperatures of 35–45 °C and 35–55 °C, the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of PLA remained almost unchanged except for tensile strength at temperatures of 35–55 °C.
Figure 6 presents tensile properties of jute fiber after thermal cycling. For temperatures of 35–45 °C and 35–55 °C, the tensile strength and Young’ modulus of jute fiber remained almost unchanged after thermal cycling. Their results implied that the tensile property of jute fiber during thermal cycling was only slightly affected because of the heat resistance of the jute fiber constituent materials.
As presented in the results above, the tensile properties, coefficient of linear expansion and softening point of jute fiber and PLA remained almost unchanged during thermal cycling tests of jute fiber and PLA. However, tensile properties of the green composite at 103 cycles were lower than those of green composite at 0 cycles when thermal cycling tests were conducted at temperatures of 35–45 °C. In addition, expansion and contraction of the jute fiber and PLA in the green composite are related to the temperature range and the coefficient of linear expansion of jute fiber and PLA. Tensile properties of the green composite at an early stage were decreased because of the expansion and contraction of jute fiber and PLA by the increase of the temperature range. Therefore, tensile properties of the green composite during thermal cycling were affected by a difference of coefficient of linear expansion of jute fiber and PLA.

4.3. Fracture Surface of Green Comsposite after Thermal Cycling

Figure 7 presents the fracture surface of the green composite at 0 cycles. Figure 8 and Figure 9 show fracture surfaces of green composites after thermal cycling. Fiber pull out in fracture surfaces of green composites were found before and after thermal cycling. For temperatures of 35–45 °C, the lengths of fiber pull out in fracture surfaces of green composites at one cycle and 10 cycles were longer than that of green composite at 0 cycles. After 10 cycles, the length of fiber pull out in the fracture surface of the green composite at 102 cycles increased slightly. In addition, the length of fiber pull out in the fracture surface of the green composite at 103 cycles became great.
For temperatures of 35–55 °C, the length of fiber pull out in the fracture surface of the green composite at one cycle was longer than that of the green composite at 0 cycles. Subsequently, the length of the fiber pull out in the fracture surface of the green composite remained almost unchanged until 102 cycles. The length of fiber pull out of fracture surface of green composite at 103 cycles was longer than that of the green composite at 102 cycles.
The coefficient of linear expansion of jute fiber was 78% lower than that of PLA. Interfacial adhesion between the fiber and resin during thermal cycling was decreased, probably because of expansion and contraction by the difference of the coefficient of linear expansions of jute fiber and PLA. Interfacial adhesion between the fiber and resin during thermal cycling was greatly decreased by an increase of the temperature range. In addition, debonding at the interface between the fiber and resin during thermal cycling might occur because of the decrease of interfacial adhesion between fiber and resin for temperatures of 35–55 °C. Therefore, the tensile property of green composites was affected because of the decreased interfacial adhesion between the fiber and resin under thermal cycling.

5. Conclusions

In this study, residual tensile properties of plain woven jute fiber reinforced PLA were investigated during thermal cycling. Results suggest the following conclusions.
For temperatures of 35–45 °C, the tensile strength of the green composite decreased gradually with an increased number of cycles. Young’s modulus of the green composite decreased slightly with an increased number of cycles. For temperatures of 35–55 °C, the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the green composite at one cycle was lower than that of green composite at 0 cycles. Subsequently tensile strength and Young’s modulus of green composite remained almost unchanged until 102 cycles. The tensile strength and Young’s modulus of green composite at 103 cycles were lower than those of the green composite at 102 cycles. For temperatures of 35–45 °C and 35–55 °C, tensile properties, coefficients of linear expansion and softening points of jute fiber and PLA did not change with an increased number of cycles. However, the coefficient of linear expansion of jute fiber was lower than that of PLA. Interfacial adhesion between the fiber and resin during thermal cycling was decreased, probably because of expansion and contraction by the different coefficients of linear expansion of jute fiber and PLA. In addition, debonding at the interface between the fiber and resin might have occurred because of the increase of the temperature range. Therefore, tensile properties of green composites were affected because of the decrease of interfacial adhesion between the fiber and resin during thermal cycling.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the experimental work and wrote this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Holbery, J.; Houston, D. Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composite in automotive application. JOM 2006, 58, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Japan Automobile Recycling Promotion Center. Available online: http://www.jarc.or.jp/en/recycling/ (accessed on 21 June 2016).
  3. Saheb, D.N.; Jog, J.P. Natural fiber polymer composites: A review. Adv. Polym. Technol. 1999, 18, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Joshi, S.V.; Drzal, L.T.; Mohantym, A.K.; Arora, S. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos. Part A 2004, 35, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Goda, K.; Cao, Y. Research and development of fully green composites reinforced with natural fiber. J. Solid Mech. Mater. Eng. 2007, 1, 1073–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. John, M.J.; Thomas, S. Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 71, 343–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ashori, A. Wood-plastic composite as promising green-composites for automotive industries! Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4661–4667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Xie, Y.; Hill, C.A.H.; Xiao, Z.; Militz, H.; Mai, C. Silane Coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: A review. Compos. Part A 2010, 41, 806–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mantia, F.P.L.; Morreale, M. Green composites: A brief review. Compos. Part A 2011, 42, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kabir, M.M.; Wang, H.; Lau, K.T.; Cardona, F. Chemical treatment on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: An overview. Compos. Part B 2012, 43, 2883–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vink, E.T.H.; Rabago, K.R.; Glassner, D.A.; Gruber, P.R. Applications of life cycle assessment to natureworks™ polylactide (PLA) production. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2003, 80, 403–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mohanty, A.K.; Tummala, P.; Liu, W.; Misra, M.; Mulukutla, P.V.; Drzal, L.T. Injection molded biocomposites form soy protein based bioplastic and short industrial hemp fiber. J. Polym. Environ. 2005, 13, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, X.; Netravali, A. Characterization of flax fiber reinforced soy protein resin based green composites modified with nano-clay particles. Compos. Sci. Tech. 2007, 67, 2005–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ogihara, S.; Okada, A.; Kobayashi, S. Mechanical properties in a bamboo fiber/PBS biodegradable composite. J. Solid Mech. Mater. Eng. 2008, 2, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ren, B.; Mizue, T.; Goda, K.; Noda, J. Effects of fluctuation of fibre orientation on tensile properties of flax sliver-reinforced green composites. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 3457–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Katogi, H.; Shimamura, Y.; Tohgo, K.; Fujii, T.; Takemura, K. Fatigue behavior of unidirectional jute spun yarn reinforced PLA. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2012, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ben, G.; Hirabayashi, A.; Kawazoe, Y. Evaluation of quasi-isotropic plate and cylindrical shell fabricated with green composite sheets. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2013, 22, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kobayashi, S. Damage behavior of hemp fiber reinforced poly(l-lactic acid) composites under fatigue loading. J. Solid Mech. Mater. Eng. 2013, 7, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, Y.; Kwon, O.H.; Park, W.H.; Cho, D. Thermomechanical and flexural properties of chopped silk fiber-reinforced poly(butylenes succinate) green composites: Effect of electron beam treatment of worm silk. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2013, 22, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Katogi, H.; Takemura, K. The effect of soil on the biodegradable behavior of green composites under various environmental (ambient) temperature. WIT Trans. Eng. Sci. 2015, 90, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
  21. Katayama, T.; Tanaka, K.; Murakami, T.; Uno, K. Compression moulding of jute fabric reinforced thermoplastics composites based on PLA non-woven fabric. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 2006, 85, 159–167. [Google Scholar]
  22. Khondker, O.K.; Ishiaku, U.S.; Nakai, A.; Hamada, H. A novel processing technique for thermoplastic manufacturing of unidirectional composites reinforced with jute fiber. Compos. Part A 2006, 37, 2274–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Takagi, H.; Asano, A. Effects of processing conditions on flexural properties of cellulose nanofiber reinforced “green” composites. Compos. Part A 2007, 39, 685–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Takemura, K.; Minekage, M. Effect of molding condition on tensile properties of hemp fiber reinforced composite. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2007, 16, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arao, Y.; Fujiura, T.; Itani, S.; Tanaka, T. Strength improvement in injection-molded jute-fiber-reinforced polylactide green composites. Compos. Part B 2015, 68, 2000–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Toyota Boshoku Co., Ltd. Available online: http://www.toyota-boshoku.com/jp/about/development/flash/index.html (accessed on 3 March 2016).
  27. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. Available online: http://www.mlit.go.jp/jidosha/kensatoroku/question/ (accessed on 21 June 2016).
  28. Ben, G.; Kihara, Y.; Nakamori, K.; Aoki, Y. Examination of heat resistant tensile properties and molding conditions of green composite composed of kenaf fibers and PLA resin. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2007, 16, 361–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nassiopoulos, E.; Njuguna, J. Thermo-mechanical performance of poly(lactic acid)/flax fibre-reinforced biocomposites. Mater. Des. 2015, 66, 473–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Katogi, H.; Takemura, K.; Miyamoto, S. Effect of surface treatment on flexural creep behavior of plain woven jute fiber reinforced PLA. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Fracture and Strength of Solids, Jeju, Korea, 9–13 June 2013. OS31-010.
  31. Japan Automobile Federation. Available online: http://www.jaf.or.jp/eco-safety/safety/usertest/temperature/detail2.htm (accessed on 3 March 2016).
  32. Sakiyama, M.; Katogi, H.; Takemura, K. Thermal fatigue and water absorption on mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced plastics. Reinf. Plast. 2012, 58, 13–16. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  33. Ray, D.; Sarkar, B.K. Characterization of alkali-treated jute fibers for physical and mechanical properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 80, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Japanese Industrial Standard. Testing Method for Linear Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Plastic by Thermomechanical Analysis; JIS K 7197; Japanese Standards Association: Tokyo, Japan, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  35. Japanese Industrial Standard. Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 2: Test Conditions for Moulding and Extrusion Plastics; JIS K 7162; Japanese Standards Association: Tokyo, Japan, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  36. Japanese Industrial Standard. Testing Method for Tensile Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastics; JIS K 7054; Japanese Standards Association: Tokyo, Japan, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nishino, T.; Matsuda, I.; Hirao, K. All-cellulose composite. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 7683–7687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Goring, D.A.I. Thermal softening of lignin, hemicelluloses and cellulose. Pulp Pap. Mag. Can. 1964, 64, 517–527. [Google Scholar]
Materials 09 00573 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of specimens: (a) Green composite; (b) Poly(lactic acid) (PLA); (c) Jute fiber.
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of specimens: (a) Green composite; (b) Poly(lactic acid) (PLA); (c) Jute fiber.
Materials 09 00573 g001
Materials 09 00573 g002 1024
Figure 2. Surface temperature of green composite during one thermal cycling: (a) 35–45 °C; (b) 35–55 °C.
Figure 2. Surface temperature of green composite during one thermal cycling: (a) 35–45 °C; (b) 35–55 °C.
Materials 09 00573 g002
Materials 09 00573 g003 1024
Figure 3. Thermal mechanical analyses of jute fiber and PLA after thermal cycling: (a) Coefficient of linear expansion; (b) Softening point.
Figure 3. Thermal mechanical analyses of jute fiber and PLA after thermal cycling: (a) Coefficient of linear expansion; (b) Softening point.
Materials 09 00573 g003
Materials 09 00573 g004 1024
Figure 4. Stress-strain curves of green composite and PLA at 0 cycles.
Figure 4. Stress-strain curves of green composite and PLA at 0 cycles.
Materials 09 00573 g004
Materials 09 00573 g005 1024
Figure 5. Tensile properties of green composite and PLA during thermal cycling: (a) 35–45 °C; (b) 35–55 °C.
Figure 5. Tensile properties of green composite and PLA during thermal cycling: (a) 35–45 °C; (b) 35–55 °C.
Materials 09 00573 g005
Materials 09 00573 g006 1024
Figure 6. Tensile property of jute fiber after thermal cycling: (a) 35–45 °C; (b) 35–55 °C.
Figure 6. Tensile property of jute fiber after thermal cycling: (a) 35–45 °C; (b) 35–55 °C.
Materials 09 00573 g006
Materials 09 00573 g007 1024
Figure 7. Fiber pull out in fracture surface of green composite at 0 cycles.
Figure 7. Fiber pull out in fracture surface of green composite at 0 cycles.
Materials 09 00573 g007
Materials 09 00573 g008 1024
Figure 8. Fiber pull out in fracture surface of green composite after thermal cycling (35–45 °C): (a) 1 cycle; (b) 10 cycles; (c) 102 cycles; (d) 103 cycles.
Figure 8. Fiber pull out in fracture surface of green composite after thermal cycling (35–45 °C): (a) 1 cycle; (b) 10 cycles; (c) 102 cycles; (d) 103 cycles.
Materials 09 00573 g008
Materials 09 00573 g009 1024
Figure 9. Fiber pull out in fracture surface of green composite after thermal cycling (35–55 °C): (a) 1 cycle; (b) 10 cycles; (c) 102 cycles; (d) 103 cycles.
Figure 9. Fiber pull out in fracture surface of green composite after thermal cycling (35–55 °C): (a) 1 cycle; (b) 10 cycles; (c) 102 cycles; (d) 103 cycles.
Materials 09 00573 g009
Table
Table 1. Tensile test results of green composite and PLA (AVG: average value, SD: standard division).
Table 1. Tensile test results of green composite and PLA (AVG: average value, SD: standard division).
MaterialTemperature RangeCycleYoung’s Modulus (GPa)Tensile Strength (MPa)Failure Strain (%)
AVGSDAVGSDAVGSD
Green composite–08.90.4796.81.50.1
35–45 °C18.70.4762.71.30.1
108.60.2733.61.30.1
1008.50.6720.51.20.1
10008.50.5713.41.30.1
35–55 °C18.30.2721.31.40.1
108.20.4701.31.40.1
1008.50.4722.51.40.1
10008.00.4671.31.30.2
PLA–03.40.1590.3123.5
35–45 °C13.00.2560.79.01.2
103.00.5602.9124.2
1003.10.1581.79.03.0
10003.20.1551.38.72.3
35–55 °C13.00.4610.1161.4
103.50.1630.6123.2
1003.30.2621.0132.1
10003.00.1554.78.42.0

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Katogi, H.; Takemura, K.; Akiyama, M. Residual Tensile Property of Plain Woven Jute Fiber/Poly(Lactic Acid) Green Composites during Thermal Cycling. Materials 2016, 9, 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070573

AMA Style

Katogi H, Takemura K, Akiyama M. Residual Tensile Property of Plain Woven Jute Fiber/Poly(Lactic Acid) Green Composites during Thermal Cycling. Materials. 2016; 9(7):573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070573

Chicago/Turabian Style

Katogi, Hideaki, Kenichi Takemura, and Motoki Akiyama. 2016. "Residual Tensile Property of Plain Woven Jute Fiber/Poly(Lactic Acid) Green Composites during Thermal Cycling" Materials 9, no. 7: 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070573

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop