Next Article in Journal
Coating Methods for Surface Modification of Ammonium Nitrate: A Mini-Review
Previous Article in Journal
Functionalization of Cellulose Nanocrystals in Choline Lactate Ionic Liquid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Silk Fiber as the Support and Reductant for the Facile Synthesis of Ag–Fe3O4 Nanocomposites and Its Antibacterial Properties

1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
2
Joint Laboratory for Extreme Conditions Matter Properties, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(7), 501; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070501
Submission received: 24 March 2016 / Revised: 13 June 2016 / Accepted: 15 June 2016 / Published: 23 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Composites)

Abstract

:
We report a facile and environmentally friendly approach to prepare Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber nanocomposites. The Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber acts as: (i) a biocompatible support for the silver nanoparticles; and (ii) a reducing agent for the silver ions. Neither additional reducing agents nor toxic organic solvents were used during the preparation process. The Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber nanocomposites can be actuated by a small household magnet and have high antibacterial activities against both Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. These nanocomposites could be easily recycled without a decrease in their antibacterial activities due to the synergistic effects between the Ag NPs and Fe3O4 NPs with large amounts of active sites.

1. Introduction

Multi-component nanocomposites include two or more types of nanoparticles and have attracted increasing attention in catalysis, photography, electronic, antibacterial, and optical applications due to their unique functions [1,2]. As a biomedical material, silk fiber plays a key role in the design and synthesis of nanocomposite materials with controllable loading with nanoparticles dispersed on the surface of the chains [2,3,4]. As the most frequently used nanoparticles, magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles and Ag nanoparticles have been employed in the synthesis of advanced nanocomposites. These Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with good biocompatibility and low toxicity can be used for bioseparation, targeted drug delivery, and magnetic resonance imaging [5,6,7,8,9]. However, all of these applications required suitable stabilization of the magnetic nanoparticles to prevent their aggregation and chemical transformation.
Much interest has focused on Ag NPs’ antibacterial activity against a broad spectrum of bacteria and viruses [10,11,12]. In addition, Ag NPs are not yet associated with antibiotic resistance relative to established pharmaceuticals [13]. However, Ag NPs have two primary drawbacks including incomplete removal from the reaction medium and aggregation—this limits them to use in water. The large-scale use of Ag NPs has also been limited by environmental concerns in which Ag NPs can cause serious adverse health effects [14]. Because of their very small size, neither filtration nor centrifugation methods are sufficient to completely remove these Ag NPs from solution. Thus, the combination of magnetic iron oxide NPs and Ag NPs can provide a good alternative because these Ag NPs can be easily separated from the solution via a magnetic field. For nanomaterials, pure NPs are easily assembled into large particles because of the inter-particle dipolar force. This decreases the specific surface area [15]. To inhibit aggregation, NPs can be loaded into various materials such as silica nanospheres [16], graphene oxide [17], silk fiber, etc. [2,3,4]. However, environmentally friendly and sustainable methods are needed to develop renewable energy and green support materials.
Silk fibers are one such example. Silk is one of the most important renewable natural polymers and is an interesting and possible support biomaterial for magnetic NPs and antibacterial Ag NPs because of its good biocompatibility, biodegradation, and non-toxicity [18,19]. Multifunctional silk fibrin fabrics have been made via the chemical assembly of TiO2–Ag nanoparticles on the fabric surface. This gives the silk fabric antibacterial activity [20]. Anisotropic Ag NPs have been coated on silk fibers to obtain colorful silk with good antibacterial properties [21].
Here, we describe an easy and environmentally friendly route for the in situ preparation of Fe3O4 and Ag NPs using silk fiber as a bio-template. In this system, the silk fiber acts as a stabilizer to support and protect the material from agglomeration. To control the number and size of Ag NPs in the shell, we tuned the feeding amount of Ag+ ions. The Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber composites have excellent antibacterial ability against E. coli and S. aureus. These results indicate that Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber composites may have a potential application as disinfectants for water treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All chemicals including silver nitrate (AgNO3), silk fiber, and ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O) were supplied by Kelong Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China) and used without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of the Fe3O4–Silk Fiber

The Fe3O4–silk fiber composites were prepared through an improved one-step hydrothermal method [22,23]. Typically, FeCl3·6H2O (0.1622 g), NaHCO3 (0.756 g), and vitamin C (0.0294 g) were all dissolved in deionized water (40 mL) under magnetic stirring to form a homogeneous solution. Then, 1-g silk fibers were immersed in the solution. Finally, the resulting solution was transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave (50-mL capacity). The autoclave was heated at 150 °C for 4 h and allowed to cool to room temperature. The resulting black products were washed with deionized water and ethanol several times and then dried in a vacuum for 12 h.

2.3. Preparation of the Ag–Fe3O4–Silk Fiber and Ag–Silk Fiber

The Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber composites were prepared through an improved electro-less plating approach [24]. At room temperature, 2 mL of AgNO3 solution (0.01 M, 0.02 M, and 0.03 M) was added into a conical bottle followed by the dropwise addition of 10 mL of aqueous triethanolamine (TEA) solution (the complex reducing agent). Some brown sediment settled to the bottom of the bottle during the reaction. This sediment then completely dissolved, indicating that [Ag(TEA)2]+ was generated. After that, deionized water was added to obtain a total volume of 100 mL. The Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber composite or silk fibers were immersed in the reaction solution for about 1 h. Then, the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber composites were washed with deionized water to remove the untreated AgNO3. The as-prepared Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber samples with different AgNO3 concentrations were signed as Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#, 2#, and 3#).

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity of the Ag–Fe3O4–Silk Fiber and Ag–Silk Fiber

The sterile Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber, Ag–Silk fiber, Fe3O4–silk fiber, and control silk fiber were individually prepared and dried at 30 °C. Separate tubes of Luria-Bertani (LB) Broth were inoculated with overnight cultures of two bacterial strains Escherichia coli (E. coli, ATCC 25922, a Gram-negative bacteria) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, ATCC 25923, a Gram-positive bacteria) to give an initial bacterial density of 108 CFU/mL. This was over laid onto agarose medium plates.
Tests were performed in triplicates using the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber, Ag–Silk fiber disks as possible antibacterial materials, the silk fiber as the negative control, and Kanamycin as the positive control. The Petri plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and the inhibition zone formed around each disc was later measured via photography.

2.5. Characterization Methods

The phase compositions of the samples were confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’Pert PRO, PANalytical B.V, Almelo, The Netherlands) with Cu-Kα radiation operating at 2.2 kW, and the step size was 0.0167111. The microstructure of the samples was characterized with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Ultra 55, Carl Zeiss AG, Heidenheim, Germany), and the element constitution and element mapping of the samples were characterized with the FE-SEM (JSE-7500F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an EDS accessory (INCA250 X-MAX 50 system, Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK). The static magnetic properties of the samples were determined using a vibration sample magnetometer (BKT-4500Z, Zetianweiye, Beijing, China) at room temperature.

2.6. Quantification of Relesased Ag+ by ICP-MS

In order to determine whether the antimicrobial activity on samples was possibly affected by the nano Ag (or Ag+) released to the nutrient media, the media were analyzed for the presence of Ag. The concentration of Ag was measured by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, iCAP6500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Renfrew, UK).

3. Results and Discussion

SEM images were captured to explore the surface morphologies of the unmodified and modified silk fibers (Figure 1). The degummed silk fibers show very smooth surfaces. This suggests the successful removal of sericin from raw silk (Figure 1A). After this hydrothermal reaction, some small dots appeared on the silk surfaces (Figure 1B) indicating the efficient in situ synthesis of Fe3O4 NPs. The inset of Figure 1B shows the EDX elemental maps of the Fe3O4–silk fiber composite. The uniform distribution of Fe3O4 NPs in the composite was confirmed from the maps. As the Fe3O4–silk fiber composite formed in the AgNO3 solution, the density of the dots gradually increases, and the dots aggregate to form clusters (Figure 1C and Figure S1). The inset of Figure 1C shows the EDX elemental maps of the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber composite. The uniform distribution of Ag NPs and Fe3O4 NPs in the composite was confirmed via these maps. The Ag NPs were synthesized evenly on the fiber surface (Figure 1D). No bulk aggregates were present in the field of view. The EDX elemental map confirms that the Ag is present on the Ag–silk fiber composite surfaces. According to the EDX data, the weight percent values of Ag were 0.58% (1#), 1.14% (2#), and 1.75% (3#).
The XRD patterns are shown in Figure 2. This depicts the crystal structure of the silk fiber, Fe3O4 NPs, and Ag NPs. The iron oxide phase in the Fe3O4 NPs can be verified from the diffraction peaks at 30.0°, 35.3°, 42.8°, 56.9°, and 62.5°. They correspond to the (220), (311), (400), (511), and (440) planes of the face-centered cubic (fcc) structure of Fe3O4 (JCPDS No. 87-2334), respectively. This indicates the successful synthesis of the Fe3O4 NPs [25]. Furthermore, the Fe3O4/Ag–Silk fibers display four major peaks at 38.2°, 44.4°, 64.6°, and 77.5° corresponding to the (111), (200), (220), and (311) crystal planes, respectively. This indicates the fcc structure of the Ag NPs (JCPDS No. 87-0720) [26].
One of the most important and unique properties of nanostructured precious metals is their localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR). This appears when the size of the nanostructures becomes comparable to or smaller than the mean free path of the conducting electrons in the metal. Hence, the UV-vis adsorption spectrum of the silk fibers, Fe3O4–silk fibers, Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#), and Ag–Silk fibers were measured, as showing in Figure 3. The surface plasmon resonance peak of the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#) was wide relative to the spectrum of the Fe3O4–silk fibers and Ag–Silk fibers. This results from the electron transfer across the Ag–Fe3O4 interface [27].
Next, the magnetic properties of the Fe3O4–silk fibers and the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#–3#) were investigated because the superparamagnetic properties of these materials are critical to ensuring their proper applications. The saturation magnetization (Ms) of the Fe3O4–silk fibers, Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#), Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#), and Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (3#) are 45.06 emu·g−1, 33.83 emu·g−1, 31.38 emu·g−1, and 27.41 emu·g−1, respectively (Figure 4A). A lower Ms was observed for the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers than the Fe3O4–silk fibers. This reduction in the nanocomposites originates from the interactions between the Fe3O4 and Ag NPs as well as the presence of the non-magnetic Ag NPs [28]. Further confirmation and examination of the Ms of the hybrids with different amounts of Ag NPs is currently under investigation. The remanence (Mr) and coercivity (Hc) of the Fe3O4–silk fibers are 1.1 emu·g−1 and 13.98 Oe. For the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#), they are 1.3 emu·g−1 and 17.04 Oe, respectively (Figure 4B). Due to this small remanence and coercivity, the Fe3O4–silk fibers and Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#) exhibit superparamagnetic behavior.
Of note, the Ms of the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#) prepared in this study were much higher than that of the magnetic antibacterial nanocomposites (18 emu·g−1) prepared by Sureshkumar et al. [29]. The higher Ms ensured a better magnetic response of the magnetic nanocomposites toward an external magnetic field. The strong magnetic response of both samples is also demonstrated by the photographs in Figure 4A. These results indicate that the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers possess good magnetic properties. This ensures a good magnetic response in the application of magnetic field-assisted separation of the Ag NPs.
We investigated the antimicrobial activity of the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers against E. coli and S. aureus using the disk diffusion method. Figure 5 shows that the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers have good antibacterial effects for both bacterial strains. Furthermore, the sample with the smaller mass proportion of Ag has a slightly narrower zone, whereas the sample Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#) (33.83 emu·g−1) has wider inhibition zones. In addition, the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#) have a marginally stronger antibacterial activity than the Ag–silk fibers. The antibacterial activity of the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers is similar to that of the silver nanoparticle-hydroxyapatite composites. This is attributed to the release of Ag+ into the media [30]. Silver can bind to the bacterial cell wall and cell membrane to inhibit respiration and DNA replication [31]. To further evaluate the effect of Ag+ on antimicrobial activity, the amount of Ag+ released into the nutrient media from the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber nanocomposites was measured by ICP-MS. The obtained results are summarized in Table 1.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we explored a facile and environmentally friendly method of preparing Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber nanocomposites consisting of magnetic NPs, Ag NPs, and silk fibers. It acted as a stabilizer to support the protecting agent against agglomeration. The superior magnetic properties of the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber nanocomposites ensured a good magnetic response for the separation process. The preliminary antibacterial assays indicated that the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers possess excellent antibacterial ability against E. coli and S. aureus. This might be due to the synergistic effects between AgNPs and Fe3O4NPs affixed to the one-dimensional (1D) silk nano- or microfibers. Given these advantages, we believe that these Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber nanocomposites can be broadly used as a recyclable anti-bacterial agent in medical and environmental applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/9/7/501/s1. Figure S1: SEM of Ag@Fe3O4@Silk fiber (2#).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Mianyang City (14S-01-2) and Fundamental Science on Nuclear Wastes and Environmental Safety Laboratory (15kffk05).

Author Contributions

Xiaonan Liu and Guangfu Yin conceived and designed the experiments; Xiaonan Liu performed the experiments; Xiaonan Liu and Yi Zao analyzed the data; Tao Duan contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Xiaonan Liu wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carlsson, D.C.; Nystrom, G.; Zhou, Q.; Berglund, L.A.; Nyholm, L.; Strømme, M.M. Electroactive nanofibrillated cellulose aerogel composites with tunable structural and electrochemical properties. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 19014–19024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dallas, P.; Tucek, J.; Jancik, D.; Kolar, M.; Panacek, A.; Zboril, R. Magnetically controllable silver nanocomposite with multifunctional phosphotriazine matrix and high antimicrobial activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 2347–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kucheryavy, P.; He, J.; John, V.T.; Maharjan, P.; Spinu, L.; Goloverda, G.Z.; Kolesnichenko, V.L. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with variable size and an iron oxidation state as prospective imaging agents. Langmuir 2013, 29, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, N.; Hyeon, T. Designed synthesis of uniformly sized iron oxide nanoparticles for efficient magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2575–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gupta, A.K.; Gupta, M. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 3995–4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dobson, J. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Drug Dev. Res. 2006, 67, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sunderland, C.J.; Steiert, M.; Talmadge, J.E.; Derfus, A.M.; Barry, S.E. Targeted nanoparticles for detecting and treating cancer. Drug Dev. Res. 2006, 67, 70–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arruebo, M.; Fernandez-Pacheco, R.; Ibarra, M.R.; Santamaria, J. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nano Today 2007, 2, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qiao, R.R.; Yang, C.H.; Gao, M.Y. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: From preparations to in vivo MRI applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 6274–6293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, Q.; Vitchuli, N.; Nowak, J.; Noar, J.; Caldwell, J.M.; Breidt, F.; Bourham, M.; McCord, M.; Zhang, X. One-step synthesis of silver nanoparticle-filled nylon 6 nanofibers and their antibacterial properties. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 10330–10335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Koga, H.; Kitaoka, T.; Wariishi, H. In situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles on zinc oxide whiskers incorporated in a paper matrix for antibacterial applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 2135–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cheng, F.; Betts, J.W.; Kelly, S.M.; Schaller, J.; Heinze, T. Synthesis and antibacterial effects of aqueous colloidal solutions of silver nanoparticles using aminocellulose as a combined reducing and capping reagent. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 989–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Markova, Z.; Siskova, K.; Filip, J.; Safarova, K.; Prucek, R.; Panacek, A.; Kolar, M.; Zboril, R. Chitosan-based synthesis of magnetically-driven nanocomposites with biogenic magnetite core, controlled silver size, and high antimicrobial activity. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 2550–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Park, H.H.; Park, S.; Ko, G.; Woo, K. Magnetic hybrid colloids decorated with Ag nanoparticles bite away bacteria and chemisorb viruses. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 2701–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Z.X.; Li, W.; Webley, P.A.; Zhao, D.Y. General and controllable synthesis of novel mesoporous magnetic iron oxide@ carbon encapsulates for efficient arsenic removal. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, Y.; Wang, Q.H.; Wang, T.M. Facile large-scale synthesis of brain-like mesoporous silica nanocomposites via a selective etching process. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 16442–16450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Abdelhamid, H.N.; Khan, M.S.; Wu, H.F. Graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for gramicidin (GOGD) for high antibacterial performance. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 50035–50046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fei, X.; Jia, M.H.; Du, X.; Yang, Y.H.; Zhang, R.; Shao, Z.Z.; Zhao, X.; Chen, X. Green synthesis of silk fibroin-silver nanoparticle composites with effective antibacterial and biofilm-disrupting properties. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 4483–4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, H.Y.; Ma, X.L.; Cao, C.B.; Wang, M.N.; Zhu, Y.Q. Multifunctional iron oxide/silk-fibroin (Fe3O4–SF) composite microspheres for the delivery of cancer therapeutics. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 41572–41577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, G.; Liu, H.; Zhao, H.; Gao, Y.; Wang, J.; Jiang, H.; Boughton, R. Chemical assembly of TiO2 and TiO2@ Ag nanoparticles on silk fiber to produce multifunctional fabrics. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 358, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tang, B.; Li, J.L.; Hou, X.L.; Sun, T.; Afrin, L.; Wang, X.G. Colorful and antibacterial silk fiber from anisotropic silver nanoparticles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 4556–4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, X.; Zhuang, J.; Chen, D.; Liu, H.; Tang, F.; Yan, X.; Meng, X.; Zhang, L.; Ren, J. General strategy for designing functionalized magnetic microspheres for different bioapplications. Langmuir 2009, 25, 11657–11663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Guo, W.C.; Wang, Q.; Wang, G.; Yang, M.; Dong, W.J.; Yu, J. Facile Hydrogen-bond-assisted polymerization and immobilization method to synthesize hierarchical Fe3O4@poly (4-vinylpyridine-co-divinylbenzene)@ Au nanostructures and their catalytic applications. Chem. Asian J. 2013, 8, 1160–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yi, Z.; Xu, X.B.; Fang, Q.; Wang, Y.Y.; Li, X.B.; Tan, X.L.; Luo, J.S.; Jiang, X.D.; Wu, W.D.; Yi, Y.G.; et al. Fabrication of silver nanosheets on quartz glass substrates through electroless plating approach. Appl. Phys. A 2014, 114, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xiong, R.; Lu, C.H.; Wang, Y.R.; Zhou, Z.H.; Zhang, X.X. Nanofibrillated cellulose as the support and reductant for the facile synthesis of Fe3O4/Ag nanocomposites with catalytic and antibacterial activity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 14910–14918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yi, Z.; Luo, J.S.; Tan, X.L.; Yi, Y.; Yao, W.T.; Kang, X.L.; Ye, X.; Zhu, W.K.; Duan, T.; Yi, Y.G.; et al. Mesoporous gold sponges: Electric charge-assisted seed mediated synthesis and application as surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates. Sci. Report 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yu, H.; Chen, M.; Rice, P.M.; Wang, S.X.; White, R.L.; Sun, S.H. Dumbbell-like bifunctional Au–Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, J.; Sun, Y.; Huang, S.; Yu, K.; Zhao, Q.; Peng, F.; Yu, H.; Wang, H.; Yang, J. Crystal engineering and SERS properties of Ag–Fe3O4 nanohybrids: From heterodimer to core–shell nanostructures. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 17930–17937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sureshkumar, M.; Siswanto, D.Y.; Lee, C.K. Magnetic antimicrobial nanocomposite based on bacterial cellulose and silver nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 6948–6955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Andrade, F.A.C.; Vercik, L.C.D.; Monteiro, F.J.; Rigo, E.C.D. Preparation, characterization and antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles–hydroxyapatite composites by a simple and eco-friendly method. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 2271–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rai, M.; Yadav, A.; Gade, A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Typical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the samples: (A) silk fiber; (B) Fe3O4–silk fiber; (C) Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber (2#); and (D) Ag–Silk fiber. EDX spectra of Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#–3#).
Figure 1. Typical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the samples: (A) silk fiber; (B) Fe3O4–silk fiber; (C) Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber (2#); and (D) Ag–Silk fiber. EDX spectra of Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#–3#).
Materials 09 00501 g001aMaterials 09 00501 g001b
Figure 2. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the silk fibers, Fe3O4–silk fibers, Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#) and Ag–Silk fibers.
Figure 2. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the silk fibers, Fe3O4–silk fibers, Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#) and Ag–Silk fibers.
Materials 09 00501 g002
Figure 3. UV-vis spectrum of the silk fibers, Fe3O4–silk fibers, Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#), and Ag–Silk fibers (2#).
Figure 3. UV-vis spectrum of the silk fibers, Fe3O4–silk fibers, Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#), and Ag–Silk fibers (2#).
Materials 09 00501 g003
Figure 4. (A) Room temperature magnetic hysteresis loops for Fe3O4–silk fibers, Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#), Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#), and Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (3#). Response of the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#) to an external magnet (inset of Figure 4A); (B) Magnification of the magnetic hysteresis loops in the region of the most rapid change with changing applied field intensity (Fe3O4–silk fibers and Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#)).
Figure 4. (A) Room temperature magnetic hysteresis loops for Fe3O4–silk fibers, Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#), Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#), and Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (3#). Response of the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#) to an external magnet (inset of Figure 4A); (B) Magnification of the magnetic hysteresis loops in the region of the most rapid change with changing applied field intensity (Fe3O4–silk fibers and Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#)).
Materials 09 00501 g004
Figure 5. Representative images containing the inhibition zone of E. coli with 108 CFU/mL (A,C) and S. aureus with 108 CFU/mL (B,D). Samples A1–5 and B1–5 are silk fibers, silk fibers with Kanamycin, Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (3#), Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#), and Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#), respectively. Samples C1–5 and D1–5 are silk fibers, Fe3O4–silk fibers, silk fibers with Kanamycin, Ag–Silk fibers, and Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#), respectively.
Figure 5. Representative images containing the inhibition zone of E. coli with 108 CFU/mL (A,C) and S. aureus with 108 CFU/mL (B,D). Samples A1–5 and B1–5 are silk fibers, silk fibers with Kanamycin, Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (3#), Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#), and Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#), respectively. Samples C1–5 and D1–5 are silk fibers, Fe3O4–silk fibers, silk fibers with Kanamycin, Ag–Silk fibers, and Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#), respectively.
Materials 09 00501 g005
Table 1. The amount of Ag released into the nutrient media from the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber nanocomposites, as measured by ICP-MS.
Table 1. The amount of Ag released into the nutrient media from the Ag–Fe3O4–silk fiber nanocomposites, as measured by ICP-MS.
MaterialsAmount of Ag in Ion State (X) (μg/mL)Total Amount of Ag (Y) (μg/mL)Y Minus X (μg/mL)
silk fibers000
Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (1#)3.27.64.4
Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (2#)4.710.25.5
Ag–Fe3O4–silk fibers (3#)5.314.89.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, X.; Yin, G.; Yi, Z.; Duan, T. Silk Fiber as the Support and Reductant for the Facile Synthesis of Ag–Fe3O4 Nanocomposites and Its Antibacterial Properties. Materials 2016, 9, 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070501

AMA Style

Liu X, Yin G, Yi Z, Duan T. Silk Fiber as the Support and Reductant for the Facile Synthesis of Ag–Fe3O4 Nanocomposites and Its Antibacterial Properties. Materials. 2016; 9(7):501. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070501

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Xiaonan, Guangfu Yin, Zao Yi, and Tao Duan. 2016. "Silk Fiber as the Support and Reductant for the Facile Synthesis of Ag–Fe3O4 Nanocomposites and Its Antibacterial Properties" Materials 9, no. 7: 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070501

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop