Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Particle Size on Thermal Conduction in Granular Mixtures
Previous Article in Journal
Addendum: Zhao, X.; et al. Properties of Foamed Mortar Prepared with Granulated Blast-furnace Slag. Materials 2015, 8(2), 462-473
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study on Artificial Cemented Sand Prepared with Ordinary Portland Cement with Different Contents

1
Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area (Chongqing University), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400045, China
2
School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2015, 8(7), 3960-3974; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8073960
Submission received: 20 May 2015 / Revised: 23 June 2015 / Accepted: 24 June 2015 / Published: 2 July 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Materials Characterization)

Abstract

:
Artificial cemented sand test samples were prepared by using ordinary Portland cement (OPC) as the cementing agent. Through uniaxial compression tests and consolidated drained triaxial compression tests, the stress-strain curves of the artificial cemented sand with different cementing agent contents (0.01, 0.03, 0.05 and 0.08) under various confining pressures (0.00 MPa, 0.25 MPa, 0.50 MPa and 1.00 MPa) were obtained. Based on the test results, the effect of the cementing agent content (Cv) on the physical and mechanical properties of the artificial cemented sand were analyzed and the Mohr-Coulomb strength theory was modified by using Cv. The research reveals that when Cv is high (e.g., Cv = 0.03, 0.05 or 0.08), the stress-strain curves of the samples indicate a strain softening behavior; under the same confining pressure, as Cv increases, both the peak strength and residual strength of the samples show a significant increase. When Cv is low (e.g., Cv = 0.01), the stress-strain curves of the samples indicate strain hardening behavior. From the test data, a function of Cv (the cementing agent content) with c′ (the cohesion force of the sample) and Δϕ′ (the increment of the angle of shearing resistance) is obtained. Furthermore, through modification of the Mohr-Coulomb strength theory, the effect of cementing agent content on the strength of the cemented sand is demonstrated.

1. Introduction

Cemented sand is widely found in nature. It can be formed in multiple ways, such as precipitation of silicon dioxide and oxidation reaction of the ferric oxide in the sand [1,2,3,4]. There are three kinds of cements, which are classified, according to their compositions, as siliceous cement, carbonate cement and clay mineral cement. Since the 1970s, scholars have been researching cemented sand. Usluogullari et al. [5] studied the effect of curing time on the physical and mechanical properties of cemented sand through triaxial compression test on the artificial cemented sand sample produced with OPC. Trads et al. [6] conducted triaxial testing and discrete element method (DEM) analysis on cement bond sand and gypsum cement sand samples, and found that the mechanical properties of cemented sand depend not only on density and confining pressure of the sample, but also on the cement ratio. Thian et al. [7] examined the stress-strain behavior of the artificial cemented sand sample produced with ordinary Portland cement under low confining pressure. By comparing it with uncemented sand, they found that cemented sand has greater strength and stiffness. Coop et al. [8,9] carried out triaxial compression tests on calcareous sandstone, silica sandstone and artificial cemented sand, and stated that sand should be defined not only by its chemical composition, but by its structure during natural formation. Xumin Wang et al. [10] prepared calcium oxide cemented sand with a secondary water blending method, analyzed the influence of the added amount of calcium oxide on the physical and mechanical properties of cemented sand, and defined the chemical index β to manifest the yield of cement. Nardelli et al. [11] studied the mesoscopic mechanical properties of artificial cemented sand through experiments. Ravi et al. [12] modified silt soil by mixing a certain proportion of desulfurized fly ash and lime, and through triaxial tests reached the conclusion that conventional sand can be liquefied and mixed soil samples cannot, but they have improved cementation and strength. Asghari et al. [13] established a three-dimensional grain flow numerical model through mesoscopic mechanical analysis to simulate the shear properties of cemented sandstone, identified its mechanical parameters, and studied its failure mechanism. Rios et al. [14,15] analyzed the compression behavior of an artificially cemented soil with the adjusted porosity/cement index using a correlation. In order to evaluate the effects of cementation on the mechanical properties of cement-treated soil, a series of isotropic consolidation and undrained triaxial compression shear tests were performed by Kasama et al. [16]. Also, the stress-strain behavior and mechanical characterization [17,18,19,20,21,22], the influence of grain size and mineral composition of granular soils [23] are also researched.
By reviewing the references [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], it can be seen that current research on cemented sand is mainly concerned with the mechanical properties of the cemented sand samples and the establishment of a mechanical model. As we all know, the Mohr-Coulomb strength theory assumes the cohesion and the angle of shearing resistance to be constant values. However, for artificial cemented sand, its cohesion and the angle of shearing resistance vary with cementing agent content. This means the original Mohr-Coulomb strength theory expression is not suitable for artificial cemented sand with different cementing agent content. With this in mind, the artificial cemented sand test samples were prepared for this paper by using OPC with a strength grade of 42.5 as the cementing agent. Mechanical tests are conducted on these samples and the relationships between their physical and mechanical properties, mechanical indexes and the cementing agent content are analyzed. Based on the analysis, a modified Mohr-Coulomb strength theory expression is obtained.

2. Experimental

Taking the cemented sand sample readily available in nature can easily cause damage to its cementation, with the damage taking place in a random manner. As a result, it is difficult to get high quality cemented samples directly from nature. Additionally, the parameters of natural cemented sand are controlled by many factors. It is difficult for us to get natural cemented sand samples with same parameters. Therefore, artificial cemented sand is used for research in the test. Artificial cemented sand is an artificial sample made from sand, cementing agent and water, which is used for simulating the cementation state of sand in natural state.

2.1. Raw Materials

High-purity quartz sand (SiO2 > 99%) with grains of uniform diameter is used for the tests. To avoid severe adverse effects on the internal friction angle of the samples, spherical or elliptical sand grains should be selected. The larger irregular grains should be picked out directly. Then, several standard circular sieves (5 mm, 3.35 mm, 2 mm and 1 mm) were used successively for sand grain sieving. The circular sieves are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. The circular sieves.
Figure 1. The circular sieves.
Materials 08 03960 g001
The effect of the cementing agent content on the physical and mechanical properties of the cemented sand should not be overlooked. By virtue of its excellent cementing power, OPC (with a strength grade of 42.5) is used as the cementing agent in the test. In order to eliminate the effect of impurities in water, distilled water is used in the test to ensure accuracy of the test results.

2.2. Sample Preparation

The standard circular sieves were used for sand grain sieving. The diameters of the sieves are 1 mm, 2 mm, 3.35 mm and 5 mm, respectively, as shown in Figure 1. The grading curve for the sieved quartz grains is shown in Figure 2. The sieved sand particles were thoroughly washed and oven dried at 100 °C for 24 h before use. The parameters of quartz sand are shown in Table 1. The relative density Dr is calculated from e, emin and emax. The formula is as follows:
D r = e max e e max e min
where Dr is the relative density, e is the real void ratio of the quartz sand, emax is the maximum void ratio of the quartz sand, emin is the minimum void ratio of the quartz sand. When Dr = 0, e = emax, this means that the sand is in the loosest state. When Dr = 0, e = emax, which this that the sand is in the most dense state.
Figure 2. Grading curve for the screened quartz grains.
Figure 2. Grading curve for the screened quartz grains.
Materials 08 03960 g002
Table 1. The parameters of the quartz sand.
Table 1. The parameters of the quartz sand.
Relative Density DrDry Density ρd/(g/cm3)Void Ratio e
1.01.770.50
0.81.580.62
0.01.110.70
The quartz sand should be mixed well with different proportions of OPC such that the OPC grains are evenly distributed over the surface of the sand grains. After mixing, water was added at a cementing agent-water ratio of 1:1 by mass and stirred. Then the mixed material was filled into the detachable cylindrical sample mould. To ensure uniformity of the sample, the mixed material was poured into the mould in 8 layers and compacted layer by layer. The sample had a diameter of 50 mm and a height of 100 mm, as shown in Figure 3. Four kinds of artificial cemented sand samples were prepared with OPC content Cv (mass of OPC/mass of quartz sand) being 0.01, 0.03, 0.05 and 0.08 respectively, so as to facilitate the study on the effect of cementing agent content on the physical and mechanical properties of artificial cemented sand. The compacted specimens were sealed in a plastic bag under a constant temperature of 25 °C to minimize moisture loss during the curing process and cracking caused by temperature variations. The curing time for artificial cemented sand prepared with OPC was 28 days. See Table 2 for parameters of the quartz sand.
Figure 3. Sample of artificial cemented sand.
Figure 3. Sample of artificial cemented sand.
Materials 08 03960 g003
Table 2. Parameters of cemented sand samples.
Table 2. Parameters of cemented sand samples.
Relative Density DrDry Density ρd/(g/cm3)Dry Mass (g)Mass of Quartz Sand (g)CvMass of Cementing Agent (g)Mass of Water (g)
0.81.58310306.90.013.13.1
301.00.039.09.0
295.20.0514.814.8
287.00.0823.023.0

2.3. Testing Method

The drained triaxial compression tests were performed using an MTS 815 Rock Material tester (MTS Industrial Systems Company, Eden Prairie, MN, USA), which is as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. MTS 815 Rock Material Tester.
Figure 4. MTS 815 Rock Material Tester.
Materials 08 03960 g004
Deaired water was circulated to saturate the specimens. For higher accuracy, 3 parallel samples were used in each test group. Triaxial compression tests under various confining pressures (0.25 MPa, 0.50 MPa and 1.00 MPa) were performed on the artificial cemented sand samples prepared with OPC of different contents (0.01, 0.03, 0.05 and 0.08). According to Wang et al. [34], the shearing was carried out with an axial-strain rate of 6%/h. To prevent damage to the tester by the sand grains falling from a damaged sample, the sample was covered with a rubber sleeve and fastened securely, as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Covering the sample with a rubber sleeve.
Figure 5. Covering the sample with a rubber sleeve.
Materials 08 03960 g005
To obtain the stress-strain curve of artificial cemented sand samples prepared with OPC under a confining pressure of 0 MPa, uniaxial compression test on the samples was required (see Figure 6).
Figure 6. Uniaxial compression test on the samples.
Figure 6. Uniaxial compression test on the samples.
Materials 08 03960 g006

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Stress-Strain Curve

Figure 7 provides the principal stress (σ1)-axial strain (εα) relationship curve obtained from the drained triaxial compression test under various confining pressures (0.00 MPa, 0.25 MPa, 0.50 MPa and 1.00 MPa) on the artificial cemented sand prepared with OPC of different contents (0.01, 0.03, 0.05 and 0.08).
For artificial cemented sand samples with higher cementing agent content (0.03, 0.05 and 0.08), it can be seen in Figure 7 that under the same confining pressure, the increase in the content of OPC leads to a remarkable increase in peak strength (principal stress σ1) of the sample. For instance, when the confining pressure is 0.25 Mpa, the peak strength of the sample with Cv = 0.03 is 1155.7 kPa; when Cv increases to 0.05, its peak strength is 1573.2 kPa, an increase of 417.5 kPa; when Cv increases to 0.08, its peak strength is 1937.1 kPa, another increase of 363.9 kPa. Apart from the peak strength, the residual strength of the samples increases with Cv as well. Moreover, as can be seen from the figure, the peak strength of the samples is sharper, and their strain softening behavior is more apparent. In general, the σ1α curve consists of the following stages: initial stress rise → stress rise getting slower→ peak stress → plastic softening → residual strength. The addition of OPC drives cementation between sand grains and effectively enhances the strength and integrity of the quartz sand. Therefore, more cementing agent can significantly improve the strength of artificial cemented sand and change its stress-strain properties. This is consistent with the results achieved by Schnaid [35] and Ismail et al. [36].
Figure 7. Stress-strain relationships of OPC cement sand samples under different conditions: (a) 0.00 MPa; (b) 0.25 MPa; (c) 0.50 MPa; (d) 1.00 MPa.
Figure 7. Stress-strain relationships of OPC cement sand samples under different conditions: (a) 0.00 MPa; (b) 0.25 MPa; (c) 0.50 MPa; (d) 1.00 MPa.
Materials 08 03960 g007
For artificial cemented sand samples with lower cementing agent content (0.01), it can be seen in Figure 7b–d that the stress-strain curves show no obvious peak point and demonstrate the strain hardening behavior of the samples instead. This is radically different from the samples with higher cementing agent content (0.03, 0.05 and 0.08). The reason is that low cementing agent content is not sufficient to fully fill the spaces between the sand grains, and still less to cover the surface of the sand grains. This causes the bond between sand grains to be inadequate and weak. In this case, if a confining pressure is applied, the bond between the sand grains is gradually destroyed, the artificial cemented sand is transformed to unconsolidated quartz sand, and volume of the sample is compressed. Meanwhile, the existence of confining pressure drives the generation of bite force between sand grains, which increases the stress. This phenomenon is also known as strain hardening.

3.2. Relationship between Shear Strength Index and Cementing Agent Content

The Mohr-Coulomb strength theory is one of the strength theories widely acknowledged by scholars around the world. It is expressed as follows:
τ f = c + σ tan ϕ
where τf is the shear strength (MPa), c′ is the cohesion force (MPa), σ′ is the effective confining pressure (MPa) and ϕ′ is the angle of shearing resistance (°).
It can be easily seen that τf is determined by c′, σ′ and ϕ′. In this paper, the strength theory is employed for strength index fitting, the results of which are used to extract the cohesion c′ and the angle of shearing resistance ϕ′ for analysis. Table 3 shows the peak stress of artificial cemented sand samples with different contents of OPC under various confining pressures in the test.
According to Table 3, a diagram can be drawn to show the relationship between the peak stress of samples with different cementing agent content and the confining pressure. See Figure 8.
The Mohr-Coulomb criterion represented by the principal stress can be expressed as [37]
σ 1 = A σ 3 + B
where A = 1 + sin ϕ 1 sin ϕ and B = 2 c cos ϕ 1 sin ϕ .
ϕ = a c r sin A 1 A + 1
c = B ( 1 sin ϕ ) 2 cos ϕ
As can be seen from the figure above, the strength of the artificial cemented sand prepared with OPC increases as the confining pressure get higher and there is an approximately linear relationship between them, which is largely in line with the Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion.
Through regression analysis on relevant data in Table 3, the formulas of the regression curves are obtained, as shown in Table 4. According to Equation (3) and the formulas in Table 4, parameters A and B can be obtained. With Equations (4) and (5), the calculated values of c′ and ϕ′ of the artificial cemented sand prepared with OPC can be obtained, as shown in Table 4. The correlation coefficient R2 are all greater than 0.99, which means that the values of c′ and ϕ′ are comparatively accurate.
Table 3. The peak stress of samples under different conditions.
Table 3. The peak stress of samples under different conditions.
CvConfining Pressure (MPa)Peak Stress σ1 (MPa)
0.010.000.1232
0.250.8518
0.501.8123
1.003.1034
0.030.000.3520
0.251.1557
0.502.2732
1.004.1578
0.050.000.5643
0.251.5732
0.502.8576
1.004.9673
0.080.000.7752
0.251.9371
0.503.5839
1.005.8936
Figure 8. The peak stress of samples under different conditions.
Figure 8. The peak stress of samples under different conditions.
Materials 08 03960 g008
Table 4. Values of R2, c′ and ϕ′.
Table 4. Values of R2, c′ and ϕ′.
CvFormulaCorrelation Coefficient R2Cohesion Force c′ (MPa)Angle of Shearing Resistance ϕ′(°)
0.01σ1 = 3.0086σ3 + 0.15640.99380.045130.07
0.03σ1 = 3.8585σ3 + 0.29660.99800.075436.04
0.05σ1 = 4.4450σ3 + 0.94590.99850.129539.39
0.08σ1 = 0.1873σ3 + 0.77800.99530.170842.59
Through tests, it was shown that the internal friction angle of the quartz sand used is 34.5°. By combining this with the data in Table 4, the curves that denote the relations between Cv and c′ (ϕ) are acquired, as shown in Figure 9. As the quartz sand itself is cohesionless, its cohesion force is 0. With the addition of OPC, the quartz grains are cemented and c′ becomes a non-zero value. As shown in Figure 9, the increase of Cv results in a significant increase in the cohesion force c′ of the artificial cemented sand. When Cv = 0.01, the cohesion force c′ of the sample increases by 45.1 KPa, compared with the quartz sand; when Cv = 0.03, c′ increases by 30.3 kPa from Cv = 0.01; when Cv = 0.05, c′ increases by 54.1 kPa from Cv = 0.03; when Cv = 0.08, c′ increases by 41.3 kPa from Cv = 0.05. As the quartz sand is cohensionless, the value of c′ in this paper is used to represent the cementation of OPC between quartz grains. Moreover, it can be seen from the figure that the angle of shearing resistance of the sample ϕ′ is 30.07° when Cv = 0.01, smaller than that of the quartz sand. It is probably due to the addition of cohesion to the strength criterion. As for quartz sand, c′ = 0. With the increasing of Cv, c′ of the cemented sand increases. If the cemented data was fitted with a strength envelope with no cohesion, the angle of shearing resistance was certainly higher than 34.5.With the continuing increase of Cv, ϕ′ increases as well, but at a slower pace. When Cv = 0.03, the angle of shearing resistance ϕ′ of the sample shows an increase of 5.97° as compared with Cv = 0.01; when Cv = 0.05, ϕ′ shows an increase of 3.35° as compared with Cv = 0.03; when Cv = 0.08, ϕ′ shows an increase of 3.20° as compared with Cv = 0.05.
Figure 9. The relationship curves for Cv and c′ (ϕ′)
Figure 9. The relationship curves for Cv and c′ (ϕ′)
Materials 08 03960 g009
Δc (MPa) is defined as the change of c′ for the artificial cemented sand with Cv, Δϕ′ (°) as the change of ϕ′ with Cv, while ic′ (%) and iϕ′ (%) are the change rates corresponding to c′ and ϕ respectively. Based on the values of c′ and ϕ′ when Cv is 0.01, the change in c′ and ϕ′ with the cementing agent content is shown in Table 5.
Table 5. The change of c′ and ϕ′ with different Cv.
Table 5. The change of c′ and ϕ′ with different Cv.
CvΔc′ (MPa)ic (%)Δϕ′ (°)iϕ (%)
0.030.030367.185.9719.85
0.050.0844187.149.3230.99
0.080.1257278.7112.5241.64
According to the Table 5, the values of ϕ′ and c′ obviously increase with Cv and the growth rates are high. With ic′ and iϕ′ at Cv = 0.01 excluded, the average increase rate of c′ is 39.81%, and that of ϕ′ is 5.95%. Considering the typical range of the angle of shear resistance, ϕ′ increased from 30.07° to 42.59°, which is quite significant (41.64%).
The artificial cemented sand prepared with OPC has a cohesion force (c′) and an internal friction angle (ϕ′) that change with Cv. Δϕ′ is defined as the increment of the angle of shearing resistance ϕ′. The relationship curve about Δϕ′ and Cv is shown in Figure 10 and the relationship curve for c′ and −lnCv is shown in Figure 11.
Figure 10. The relationship curve for Δϕ′ and Cv.
Figure 10. The relationship curve for Δϕ′ and Cv.
Materials 08 03960 g010
Figure 11. The relationship curve for c′ and −lnCv.
Figure 11. The relationship curve for c′ and −lnCv.
Materials 08 03960 g011
Δϕ′ and Cv are fitted with a log function, while c′ and −lnCv are fitted with a quadratic polynomial function. According to Figure 10 and Figure 11, it is known that
Δ ϕ = a ln C v + b
c = m ln 2 C v + n C v + k
where a, b, m, n and k are parameters.
For the artificial cemented sand samples prepared using OPC as the cementing agent, through curve fitting based on the test data and Equations (6) and (7), the following can be obtained:
Δ ϕ = 5.9835 ln C v + 22.716
c = 0.0454 ln 2 C v + 0.3146 C v + 0.5843
The correlation coefficients of the fitted curves are 0.9966 and 0.9996, respectively. Therefore, the assumptions that Δϕ′ and Cv follow a logarithmic equation and c′ and −lnCv follow a quadratic polynomial equation are rational.
The Mohr-Coulomb strength theory assumes the angle of shearing resistance ϕ′ to be a constant, that is, the strength envelope is a straight line. However, for artificial cemented sand, its cohesion force c′ and the angle of shearing resistance ϕ′ vary with Cv. Based on analysis of the test results and the cementing agent content Cv, a modified Mohr-Coulomb strength theory expression is obtained by substituting Equations (6) and (7) into Equation (2):
τ f = m ln 2 C v + n C v + k + σ tan ( ϕ + a ln C v + b )
where τf is the shear strength (MPa), c′ is the cohesion force (MPa), σ′ is the confining pressure (MPa), ϕ′ is the angle of shearing resistance (°) of the sand grains, Cv is the cementing agent content, and a, b, m, n and k are parameters.
In addition, when Cv = 0, Equation (10) is reduced to:
τ f = σ tan ϕ
For the artificial cemented sand prepared with OPC in this test, its Cv-related Mohr-Coulomb strength theory expression is as follows:
τ f = 0.0454 ln 2 C v + 0.3146 C v + 0.5843 + σ tan ( ϕ + 5.9835 ln C v + 22.716 )

4. Conclusions

In this study, OPC with a strength grade of 42.5 was used as the cementing agent. Different proportions of OPC were mixed with high-purity quartz sand and distilled water to prepare the artificial cemented sand samples. These samples, after 28 days of curing, were subjected to uniaxial compression and triaxial compression tests under various levels of confining pressure. Based on the stress-strain curves obtained from the tests and test data analysis and fitting, the following conclusions can be drawn:
(1)
The added amount of OPC Cv has an effect on the physical and mechanical properties of artificial cemented sand. When Cv is high (e.g., Cv = 0.03, 0.05 or 0.08), the stress-strain curve indicates a strain softening behavior of the samples; under the same confining pressure, as Cv increases, both the peak strength and residual strength of the samples show a significant increase. When Cv is low (e.g., Cv = 0.01), the stress-strain curve indicates the strain hardening behavior of the samples.
(2)
With the increase of Cv, the cohesion force c′ and Δϕ′ gradually increase. The angle of shearing resistance of the artificial cemented sand is smaller than that of the uncemented sample when Cv is low; as Cv increases, it increases as well, but in a moderate manner. c′ is much more sensitive than ϕ′ to the change in the cementing agent content.
(3)
For the artificial cemented sand prepared with OPC, Δϕ′ and Cv conform to the rule of logarithmic function, while c′ and −lnCv conform to the rule of quadratic polynomial function. The correlation coefficients of both functions are greater than 0.9965, indicating an extremely strong correlation.
(4)
Given the effect of Cv on the shear strength of the artificial cemented sand, the Mohr-Coulomb strength theory was modified and an expression based on this theory appropriate for artificial cemented sand with different levels of cementing agent content is presented.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of China (Project no. 106112014CDJZR200014 and Project no. 106112013CDJZR200004) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project no. 41372356); the authors gratefully acknowledge this support.

Author Contributions

Dongliang Li organized the experimental procedure and results and paper writing. Xinrong Liu and Xianshan Liu helped with the experimental procedure and analyzed the measured results.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mitchell, J.K.; Soga, K. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. Obermayr, M.; Dressler, K.; Vrettos, C.; Eberhard, P. A bonded-particle model for cemented sand. Comput. Geotech. 2013, 49, 299–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, J.T.; Airey, D.W. Effects of cement and density on an artificially cemented sand. In Geotechnical Engineering of Soft Rocks-Hard Soils; Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kongsukprasert, L.; Kuwano, R.K.; Tatsuoka, F. Effects of ageing on stress-strain behaviour of cement-mixed sand. In Advanced Laboratory Stress-Strain Testing of Geomaterials; Tatsuoka, Shibuya & Kuwano BV: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  5. Usluogullari, F.; Vipulanandan, C. Stress-strain behavior and California bearing ratio of artificially cemented sand. J. Test. Eval. 2011, 39, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Trads, N.; Lade, P.V. Experimental evidence of truly elastic behavior of artificial sandstone inside the cementation yield surface. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2014, 47, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Thian, S.Y.; Lee, C.Y. The effect of low confining pressures on cemented sand. J. Res. Archit. Civ. Eng. 2013, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  8. Coop, M.R.; Atkinson, J.H. The mechanics of cemented carbonate sands. Geotechnique 1993, 43, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Coop, M.R.; Cuccovillo, T. On the mechanics of structured sands. Geotechnique 1999, 49, 741–760. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, X.M.; Zhao, C.; Chen, S.X.; Zhuang, X.S. Experimental study of physico-mechanical properties of artificially cemented sand. Rock Soil Mech. 2013, 34, 3134–3140. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nardelli, V.; Coop, M.R. An experimental investigation of the micromechanical behaviour of cemented sand particles. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geomechanics from Micro to Macro, IS-Cambridge 2014, Cambridge, UK, 1–3 September 2014.
  12. Ravi, S.; Christopher, B.; Michael, J. Relationship between shear wave velocity and stresses at failure for weakly cemented sands during drained triaxial compression. Soils Found. 2011, 51, 761–771. [Google Scholar]
  13. Asghari, E.; Toll, D.G.; Haeri, S.M. Triaxial behaviour of a cemented gravely sand, Tehran alluvium. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2003, 21, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rios, S.; da Fonseca, A.V.; Baudet, B. On the shearing behaviour of an artificially cemented soil. Acta Geotech. 2014, 9, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rios, S.; da Fonseca, A.V.; Baudet, B. The effect of the porosity/cement ratio on the compression behaviour of cemented soil. J. Geotech. Environ. Eng. 2012, 138, 1422–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kasama, K.; Zen, K.; Iwataki, K. Undrained shear strength of cement-treated soils. Soils Found. 2006, 46, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saxena, S.K.; Lastrico, R.M. Static properties of lightly cemented sand. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 1978, 104, 1449–1465. [Google Scholar]
  18. Consoli, N.C.; da Fonseca, A.V.; Rios, S.; Cruz, R.; Fonini, A. Parameters controlling stiffness and strength of artificially cemented soils. Geotechnique 2012, 62, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kuwano, J.; Boon, T.W. Effects of curing time and stress on the strength and deformation characteristics of cement-mixed sand in soil stress-strain behavior: Measurement, modeling and analysis. In A Collection of Papers of the Geotechnical Symposium in Rome; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  20. Acar, Y.; El-Tahir, A. Low strain dynamic properties of artificially cemented sands. J. Geotech. Eng. 1986, 112, 1001–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Da Fonseca, A.V.; Amaral, M.F.; Panico, F.; Rios, S. Indexation of dynamic and static geomechanical properties of a cemented aggregate for transportation engineering. J. Transp. Geotech. 2014, 1, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Da Fonseca, A.V.; Rios, S.; Amaral, M.F.; Panico, F. Fatigue cyclic tests on artificially cemented soil. ASTM Geotech. Test. J. 2013, 36, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rios, S.; da Fonseca, A.V.; Consoli, N.; Floss, M.; Cristelo, N. Influence of grain size and mineralogy on the porosity/cement ratio. Geotech. Lett. 2013, 3, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maghous, S.; Consoli, N.C.; Fonini, A.; Pasa Dutra, V.F. A theoretical-experimental approach to elastic and strength properties of artificially cemented sand. Comput. Geotech. 2014, 62, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Consoli, N.C.; de Moraes, R.R.; Festugato, L. Variables controlling strength of fibre-reinforced cemented soils. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Ground Improv. 2013, 166, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Consoli, N.C.; Caberlon, C.R.; Consoli, B.S.; Maghous, S. Failure envelope of artificially cemented sand. Geotechnique 2012, 62, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Consoli, N.C.; Cruz, R.C.; Floss, M.F. Variables controlling strength of artificially cemented soil: Influence of curing time. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2011, 136, 692–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Consoli, N.C.; da Fonseca, A.V.; Caberlon, C.; Rios, S. Voids/cement ratio controlling tensile strength of cement treated soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2011, 137, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Consoli, N.C.; Caberlon, C.; da Fonseca, A.V.; Coop, M.R. Influence of voids-cement ration on stress-dilatancy-strength behavior of artificially cemented sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2012, 138, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Puppala, A.J.; Acar, Y.B.; Tumay, M.T. Cone penetration in very weakly cemented sand. J. Geotech. Eng. 1995, 121, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dupas, J.M.; Pecker, A. Static and dynamic properties of sand-cement. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 1979, 105, 419–436. [Google Scholar]
  32. Clough, G.; Sitar, N.; Bachus, R.; Rad, N. Cemented sands under static loading. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 1981, 107, 799–817. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee, M.J.; Hong, S.J.; Choi, Y.M.; Lee, W.J. Evaluation of deformation modulus of cemented sand using CPT and DMT. Eng. Geol. 2010, 115, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.H.; Leung, S.C. A particulate-scale investigation of cemented sand behavior. Can. Geotech. J. 2008, 45, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schnaid, F.; Prietto, P.D.M.; Consoli, N.C. Characterization of cemented sand in triaxial compression. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2001, 127, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ismail, M.A.; Joer, H.A.; Sim, W.H.; Randolph, M.F. Effect of cement type on shear behavior of cemented calcareous soil. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2002, 128, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stracke, F.; Jung, J.G.; Korf, E.P.; Consoli, N.C. The influence of moisture content on tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand. Soils Rocks 2012, 35, 303–308. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, D.; Liu, X.; Liu, X. Experimental Study on Artificial Cemented Sand Prepared with Ordinary Portland Cement with Different Contents. Materials 2015, 8, 3960-3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8073960

AMA Style

Li D, Liu X, Liu X. Experimental Study on Artificial Cemented Sand Prepared with Ordinary Portland Cement with Different Contents. Materials. 2015; 8(7):3960-3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8073960

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Dongliang, Xinrong Liu, and Xianshan Liu. 2015. "Experimental Study on Artificial Cemented Sand Prepared with Ordinary Portland Cement with Different Contents" Materials 8, no. 7: 3960-3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8073960

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop