Next Article in Journal
Thermodynamic Analysis for the Refining Ability of Salt Flux for Aluminum Recycling
Previous Article in Journal
Transverse Anderson Localization in Disordered Glass Optical Fibers: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Corrosion Behavior of Titanium in Artificial Saliva by Lactic Acid

1
School of Chemical Science and Technology, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
2
Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2014, 7(8), 5528-5542; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7085528
Submission received: 14 April 2014 / Revised: 30 June 2014 / Accepted: 23 July 2014 / Published: 28 July 2014

Abstract

:
As one of the main products produced by oral microorganisms, the role of lactic acid in the corrosion of titanium is very important. In this study, the corrosion behavior of titanium in artificial saliva with and without lactic acid were investigated by open-circuit potentials (OCPs), polarization curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). OCP firstly increased with the amount of lactic acid from 0 to 3.2 g/L and then tended to decrease from 3.2 to 5.0 g/L. The corrosion of titanium was distinctly affected by lactic acid, and the corrosion rate increased with increasing the amount of lactic acid. At each concentration of lactic acid, the corrosion rate clearly increased with increasing the immersing time. Results of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) also indicated that lactic acid accelerated the pitting corrosion in artificial saliva. A probable mechanism was also proposed to explain the experimental results.

1. Introduction

Since titanium is considered to have high biological affinity, it has been intensively applied in the manufacturing of biomedical devices since the 1980s [1]. In the past few decades, the increasing interest in using titanium in dentistry for bridges and crowns, metal-ceramic restorations, is due to its excellent properties of biocompatibility, low density, low thermal conductibility, mechanical behavior and corrosion resistant [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The good corrosion resistance of titanium is the result of the presence of a protective and self-adherent oxide film of a thickness of 2–6 nm formed on the titanium surface, which is mainly composed of titanium dioxide (TiO2) [9,10,11,12,13,14].
However, titanium and its alloys are often damaged during their use in some complicated environments, such as oral environments. There also have been several studies describing patients who did not adapt to titanium [15,16] or patients allergic to titanium [17,18,19,20], which is an important issue to resolve [21,22]. To find out the real reason, one of the key issues at present is to learn the corrosion behavior and mechanism of titanium in oral environments. In fact, the elements that cause the corrosion of titanium in oral environments are quite a lot, but in general, microbially-influenced corrosion (MIC) is deemed to be the main reason. Just like MIC in other environments, the mechanisms involved in oral environments are very complicated, as the process is affected by many factors, but the common viewpoint involved is that the metabolic product has a great impact on MIC. As one of the main metabolic substances in oral environments, lactic acid exists naturally in the human oral cavity as a product of the oral cell tissues and of the bacteria [23]. Thus, the role of lactic acid in the corrosion of titanium is rather important to further explore the effect of MIC in oral environments. There also are several brief studies concerning the effect of lactic acid on titanium in oral environments. Mabilleau et al. [24] investigated the corrosion resistance of CP-Ti disks for nine days of immersion in different test solutions based on artificial saliva containing F, H2O2 and lactic acid by AFM and SEM. Their results showed that the surface roughness was highly increased when titanium disks were immersed in artificial saliva containing F, H2O2 and lactic acid. Koike and Fujii [25,26] reported that titanium has a high resistance to corrosion in physiological saline and artificial saliva by immersion tests and that it was dissolved and became discolored when in contact with lactic acid or formic acid. Takahashi et al. [27] evaluated the corrosion resistance of Ti-Ag alloys in a 1% lactic acid solution. They showed that the Ti-Ag alloys had excellent corrosion resistance that was comparable or superior to that of pure titanium. Koike and Fujii [28] studied the corrosive properties of titanium in 128 mmol/L of lactic and formic acids at pH 1.0–8.5 for three weeks at 37 °C. They declared that the corrosive properties of titanium were markedly dependent on pH in formic acid and relatively less dependent on pH in lactic acid. However, up to now, there have been few reports studying the effect of lactic acid amount, and the mechanism remains unclear.
Therefore, in order to provide an in-depth understanding of the corrosion behavior of titanium in complex physiological solutions for clinical use, especially under various conditions in the mouth, and to offer significant guidance for clinical applications of titanium and its alloys, it is of importance to identify the mechanism of titanium corrosion in saliva containing lactic acid. The purpose of this work is to study the corrosion behavior of titanium and to explore the probable mechanism in artificial saliva containing lactic acid.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. pH Results

Figure 1 gives the pH values of artificial saliva containing a working electrode with and without lactic acid for different days. As can be seen from this figure, pH clearly decreases with increasing the amount of lactic acid at each time, which, in turn, suggests the weak acidity of lactic acid. Moreover, the pH slightly decreases with the increase in immersion time at the same amount of lactic acid. This also indicates that the dissolution of titanium in artificial saliva solution with and without lactic acid tends to decrease the pH value.
Figure 1. pH values of artificial saliva containing a working electrode with and without lactic acid for different days.
Figure 1. pH values of artificial saliva containing a working electrode with and without lactic acid for different days.
Materials 07 05528 g001

2.2. Open-Circuit Potential (OCP) Measurements

Figure 2 presents the open-circuit potential (OCP) of titanium after immersion in artificial saliva with and without lactic acid solutions during different times. It is clear that OCP decreases quickly with the increase time in the initial days and then tends to be stable. Additionally, OCP increases with increasing the amount of lactic acid from 0 to 3.2 g/L, but slightly decreases from 3.2 to 5.0 g/L. This implies that the amount of lactic acid significantly affects the dissolution of titanium. With increasing the amount of lactic acid from 0 to 3.2 g/L, the adsorption of lactic acid on the surface increases, which results in an increase of OCP; then, the adsorption may be saturated when the concentration is higher or equal to 3.2 g/L, that is the detachment becomes more important, which causes a slight decrease of OCP.

2.3. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Studies

Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the Nyquist plots of titanium immersed in artificial saliva without and with 5.0 g/L lactic acid. Nyquist plots are respectively presented in Figure 3a and Figure 4a. The corresponding Bode modulus diagrams and Bode phase angle diagrams are also presented in Figure 3b,c and Figure 4b,c. The EIS in the presence of other amounts of lactic acid are the same as those in the presence of 5.0 g/L lactic acid and also not presented here.
Figure 2. Open-circuit potential of titanium immersed in artificial saliva containing different amounts of lactic acid. SCE, saturated calomel electrode.
Figure 2. Open-circuit potential of titanium immersed in artificial saliva containing different amounts of lactic acid. SCE, saturated calomel electrode.
Materials 07 05528 g002
Figure 3. EIS of titanium immersed for different times in artificial saliva without lactic acid. (a) Nyquist plots; (b) bode modulus diagrams; and (c) bode phase angle diagrams.
Figure 3. EIS of titanium immersed for different times in artificial saliva without lactic acid. (a) Nyquist plots; (b) bode modulus diagrams; and (c) bode phase angle diagrams.
Materials 07 05528 g003
Figure 4. EIS of titanium immersed for different times in artificial saliva containing 5.0 g/L lactic acid. (a) Nyquist plots; (b) bode modulus diagrams; and (c) bode phase angle diagrams.
Figure 4. EIS of titanium immersed for different times in artificial saliva containing 5.0 g/L lactic acid. (a) Nyquist plots; (b) bode modulus diagrams; and (c) bode phase angle diagrams.
Materials 07 05528 g004
From Figure 3a and Figure 4a, it is clearly found that all of the diagrams are a part of the imperfect semicircles, and this is attributed to the frequency dispersion [29,30,31]. The fact that impedance diagrams have a depressed semicircular appearance shows that the corrosion of titanium is mainly controlled by a charge transfer process, and the presence of lactic acid does not change the mechanism of dissolution. In the artificial saliva medium with and without lactic acid, the diagrams show larger values of impedance. The larger values of impedance suggest the existence of a passive film with and without lactic acid [30], but the film becomes more non-protective, because the values of impedance become smaller with increasing immersion time [31]. The same phenomenon could be found in Bode modulus diagrams (Figure 3b and Figure 4b). Furthermore, Bode phase angle diagrams obtained for titanium electrodes (Figure 3c and Figure 4c) clearly show a two-time constant behavior. According to Mansfeld [31] and Tian et al. [32], two-time constants relate to a two-layer structure developed during the corrosion. Thus, a two-time constant equivalent circuit, as shown in Figure 5, can be used for pure electronic models that could verify or rule out mechanistic models and enable the calculation of numerical values corresponding to the electrochemical system under investigation [33].
Figure 5. Equivalent circuit.
Figure 5. Equivalent circuit.
Materials 07 05528 g005
In the equivalent circuit, R1 is the solution resistance; R2 is the charge transfer resistance; and R3 is the film resistance. Q2 and Q3 are the constant phase elements (CPEs) to replace the double-layer capacitance at the film-solution interface and the capacitance of the film, respectively. The constant phase element (CPE) is usually used instead of a capacitance to account for the non-ideal capacitance response, due to the almost complete absence of pure capacitance in the real electrochemical process. n is a mathematical expression where 0 ≤ n ≤ 1. If n = 0, the impedance is entirely resistance, while it is capacitance if n = 1. Additionally, 0 < n < 1 represents one of the various causes for deviation from the ideal capacitance, which is related to the surface roughness, adsorption film, porous layer formation, and so on [29]. It is quite well-known that surface roughness is of considerable importance in creating pits, which facilitate pitting corrosion [30]. The EIS parameters are fitted by this model and given in Table 1. As can be seen from this table, at the same amount of lactic acid, with increasing the immersion time, the transfer resistance (R2) obviously decreases, indicating that the corrosion is accelerated. The addition of lactic acid to solution displayed a decrease of R2 values, suggesting that lactic acid accelerates the corrosion of titanium. The solution resistance (R1) decreased with immersion time increase, because titanium released metal ions after being corroded, causing the solution resistance diminution and enhancing electrical conductivity. For the film resistance (R3), it has a smaller value compared to R2 but does not have a clear trend, due to its variation in magnitude with time for the formation and desorption of the film-electrolyte interface; generally speaking, R3 decreases with the addition of lactic acid, suggesting that the resistance of the film formed on the titanium surface to lactic acid is rather lower. The values of n1, n2 decrease with the increase in the immersion time, which further supports the idea that surface inhomogeneity is increasing due to the pitting of titanium. Additionally, an enhanced tendency of the capacitance of the film (Q3) also can be found from Table 1 with the increase of time, showing that the corrosion resistance of the film decreases with the increase of time.
To more directly demonstrate the effect of lactic acid on the corrosion of titanium, Figure 6 further presents the relationship between R2 and immersion time in artificial saliva containing different amounts of lactic acid. From this figure, it is clear that R2 decreases with increasing of the immersion time at each amount of lactic acid. Furthermore, R2 also decreases with the increase of the amount of lactic acid at the same time; namely the corrosion of titanium is noticeably accelerated by lactic acid, and the corrosion increases with the increase in the amount of lactic acid.
Table 1. EIS parameters of titanium immersed for different times in artificial saliva containing different amounts of lactic acid.
Table 1. EIS parameters of titanium immersed for different times in artificial saliva containing different amounts of lactic acid.
Lactic acidTimeR1Q2n1R3Q3n2R2
g/LdaysΩ·cm2Ω1·cm−2·sn Ω·cm2Ω1·cm−2·sn Ω·cm2
0.0117.45360.51.00098.1497.961.0006.776 × 105
213.18224.90.8957150.996.000.89503.904 × 105
36.328390.70.8525444.191.990.88893.139 × 105
55.841205.60.8342653.1303.30.87146.829 × 104
75.741124.80.7561980.3920.40.81914.209 × 104
145.370229.30.7335988.2803.30.60761.999 × 104
2.5110.01923.50.99066.28391.420.92163.837 × 105
29.681131.70.87988.92285.960.81692.914 × 105
38.423397.10.845810.53104.10.83162.227 × 105
57.605381.60.835930.83956.00.80125.030 × 104
76.794507.20.812361.64872.30.71694.1998 × 104
145.025773.60.77378.940796.20.65741.336 × 104
3.216.896928.80.99597.39294.920.89243.240 × 105
26.021566.30.93788.02820.160.88542.103 × 105
35.106793.80.8991148715.670.88711.779 × 105
54.70596.50.8086973.211.630.86553.944 × 104
73.18262.30.5844424.7946.80.73783.877 × 104
142.737134.70.5987366.3134.00.65701.172 × 104
4.516.875152.30.91299.00198.980.88122.538 × 105
26.00155.630.91088.12822.160.83541.903 × 105
35.549125.70.86944.90019.050.74657.584 × 104
55.73833.750.864848.8996.720.71263.574 × 104
74.92250.970.804011.19944.50.65152.253 × 104
143.901129.00.5053121.6182.30.64276,124
5.015.191281.50.81008.31598.340.83902.421 × 104
24.240882.80.778810.1340.440.87701.483 × 104
33.2807.8230.75885.10938.480.78834.274 × 104
52.98044.640.7395154634.100.72793.054 × 104
72.380224.20.537790.03790.10.60721.998 × 104
142.48181.190.521945.68117.90.50945,726

2.4. Polarization Curves Tests

To elucidate the role of lactic acid in the corrosion of pure titanium more clearly, polarization curves of titanium immersed in artificial saliva without and with 5.0 g/L lactic acid for different immersion times were respectively recorded and plotted in Figure 7a,b. The polarization curves in the presence of other amounts of lactic acid are the same as those in the presence of 5.0 g/L lactic acid and also not presented here. As can be seen from these figures, in the absence of lactic acid, only slight shifts in the anodic and cathodic branches are observed with the immersion time increase, but the anodic current densities remain unchanged with the increase of the applied potential before seven days of immersion, that is the passivation characteristic can be found before seven days of immersion; In the presence of 5.0 g/L lactic acid, the anodic and cathodic current densities increase obviously with the increase in the immersion time compared to that in the absence of lactic acid, suggesting that lactic acid can accelerate the corrosion of titanium, and the corrosion increases with increasing of the immersion time.
Figure 6. R2 of titanium immersed in artificial saliva containing different amounts of lactic acid.
Figure 6. R2 of titanium immersed in artificial saliva containing different amounts of lactic acid.
Materials 07 05528 g006
Figure 7. Polarization curves of titanium immersed in artificial saliva without (a) and with 5.0 g/L lactic acid (b) for different immersion times.
Figure 7. Polarization curves of titanium immersed in artificial saliva without (a) and with 5.0 g/L lactic acid (b) for different immersion times.
Materials 07 05528 g007
Polarization parameters, including the corrosion potential (Ecorr), cathodic Tafel slopes (βc), anodic Tafel slopes (βa) and corrosion current density (Icorr) obtained by extrapolation of the curves, are shown in Table 2. From Table 2, we can observe that, similar to the results from OCP, the corrosion potential decreases with the increase time in the initial days and then tends to be stable, but the corrosion potential obviously increases when lactic acid is added to artificial saliva; as for Icorr, at the same amount of lactic acid, Icorr gradually increases with the increase of immersion duration in the artificial saliva medium; furthermore, at the same immersion time, Icorr increases with the increasing amount of lactic acid, indicating that the corrosion is aggravated. These results are in good agreement with the results obtained from EIS.
Table 2. Polarization parameters of titanium in artificial saliva containing different amounts of lactic acid.
Table 2. Polarization parameters of titanium in artificial saliva containing different amounts of lactic acid.
Lactic acid g/LTime
d
Ecorr
mV
Icorr
μA/cm2
ba
mV/dec
bc
mV/dec
0.01−560.4520.221166.573194.813
2−615.4270.464156.569523.672
3−623.9420.664247.394279.867
5−689.7470.727188.126460.020
7−672.5991.367325.928247.620
14−701.0931.597323.461167.816
2.51−558.4150.483243.754832.327
2−589.4740.727188.126460.020
3−603.8380.856222.604480.795
5−661.2281.270257.742752.736
7−688.7791.957256.943127.068
14−692.8442.957112.101390.369
3.21−367.8630.605113.954193.862
2−362.0640.940145.262181.065
3−436.4981.185177.877154.509
5−437.0441.718156.346298.723
7−438.8902.37498.356221.833
14−458.1693.602119.909254.598
4.51−309.2751.158317.385331.341
2−369.8041.959285.187620.453
3−440.7542.587204.845337.687
5−433.8713.216117.898250.677
7−478.4074.373129.221225.129
14−479.7605.003150.240193.490
5.01−368.5892.226310.458760.726
2−393.7513.420304.961405.529
3−443.3043.979134.820276.343
5−466.9124.680143.859226.051
7−477.7095.615136.394233.153
14−483.3667.788160.194236.892

2.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis

In order to further study the surface morphology of titanium after immersion, scanning electron microscopy is used to characterize the corrosion surface. Figure 8a–c show the surface morphologies of titanium immersed in artificial saliva in the absence of lactic acid and in the presence of 3.2 and 5.0 g/L lactic acid for 14 days, respectively. As can be seen from these figures, the surface in the absence of lactic acid looks rather smoother, that is the corrosion attack in the absence of lactic acid is more uniform in character, and there is little tendency towards local enrichment of products on the surface. In addition, parallel features, which can be associated with abrading scratches, are also observed in Figure 8a. However, in the presence of lactic acid, pitting corrosion can be distinctly observed; by comparison, the pits in Figure 8c are obviously larger and deeper than those in Figure 8b. Therefore, the addition of lactic acid can significantly affect the formation of pitting. Consequently, at the microscopic level, the effect of lactic acid on generating pitting cannot be ignored. Additionally, the adsorption of lactic acid in the micro-point of pitting corrosion can hinder titanium passivation, providing a necessary premise and driving force for generating macro-pitting corrosion.
Figure 8. Surface morphologies of titanium immersed in artificial saliva: (a) in the absence of lactic acid; and (b) in the presence of 3.2 g/L; and (c) 5.0 g/L lactic acid for 14 days.
Figure 8. Surface morphologies of titanium immersed in artificial saliva: (a) in the absence of lactic acid; and (b) in the presence of 3.2 g/L; and (c) 5.0 g/L lactic acid for 14 days.
Materials 07 05528 g008

2.6. Corrosion Mechanism

As it is well known that the good corrosion resistance of titanium is the result of the presence of a protective and self-adherent oxide film of a thickness of 2–6 nm formed on the titanium surface, which is mainly composed of titanium dioxide (TiO2) [16,19,20,21,22,23], however TiO2 still has a weaker dissolving capacity in aqueous solution, due to the following dissolution equilibrium [20,21]:
TiO2 ↔ TiO2+ + O2−
However, TiO2+ is unstable and easy to hydrolyze in solution containing chloride ions [34],
TiO2+ + Cl + 2H2O ↔ [Ti(OH)3]·Cl + H+
The hydrolysis will decrease the pH to a certain extent, that is the corrosion of titanium in artificial saliva solution will cause the pH decrease, as can be seen from the pH variation in the corrosion process of titanium (Figure 1). Figure 1 shows that pH value slightly decreases with the increase of the immersion time in artificial saliva without lactic acid. This experimental result, in turn, suggests the possibility of the above-mentioned mechanism.
As a weak electrolyte, lactic acid will ionize to lactate (L) and H+ ions when lactic acid is added to solution. On the one hand, the ionization of lactic acid will decrease the pH value (Figure 1); thus, the pH value in the presence of lactic acid is lower than that in the absence of lactic. On the other hand, the anion, lactate (L), ionized by lactic acid, can incur the following reaction [35]:
[Ti(OH)3]·Cl+ L → [Ti(OH)3]﹒L + Cl
L is apt to form a chelate compound, which dissolves in water; this will accelerate the dissolution of passivation film (TiO2) on titanium. A tiny bit of the dissolved TiO2 causes the deficiency of the protective film, and small molecules, such as H2O, O2 and H+, can spread to the substrate by defects, leading to the tendency toward pitting corrosion. Therefore, the addition of lactic acid does accelerate the corrosion of titanium in artificial saliva.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Preparation of the Specimens

Casting samples measuring about 10 mm × 10 mm × 1 mm were made from pure titanium with the following chemical composition (mass %): Ti ≥ 99.405, Fe ≤ 0.25, C ≤ 0.10, N ≤ 0.03, H ≤ 0.015, O ≤ 0.20. The specimen was embedded in epoxy resin disk with one flat surface exposed. The exposed surface of the specimen was abraded with #100, #320, #600, #1000, #1200 and #2000 wet silicon carbide papers to obtain a mirror-like finish, then rinsed with distilled water, degreased with acetone (CH3COCH3), sterilized with 5% glutaraldehyde solution for two hours and finally dried.

3.2. Medium

All tests were conducted using simulated artificial saliva with the following chemical composition (g/L): Na2HPO4 0.26, NaCl 6.70, KSCN 0.33, KH2PO4 0.20, NaHCO3 1.50, KCl 1.20, urea 1.50, brain heart infusion broth (BHI) 37.0 and distilled water for the remainder. The pH of the medium was buffered with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid solution (HCl) at a physiological value of 6.7. Prior to the measurements, the samples were immersed in artificial saliva containing different amounts of lactic acid for different times. The corresponding concentrations of lactic acid in artificial saliva were respectively 0, 2.5, 3.2, 4.5 and 5.0 g/L.

3.3. pH Tests

pH tests were also performed in artificial saliva solutions containing a working electrode with and without lactic acid before electrochemical experiments. pH tests was surveyed by PHS-25 (Hongyi instrument Company, Shanghai, China) and performed in triplicate.

3.4. Electrochemical Examinations

The electrochemical measurements were carried out in a beaker, which is a standard three-electrode system, including a working electrode, an auxiliary electrode and a reference electrode, using a potentiostat of the PARSTAT 2263 electrochemical tester (Perkin Elmer™ company, Boston, MA, USA) interface to a personal computer. The titanium, Pt electrode and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) were adopted as working electrodes, the auxiliary electrode and the reference electrode, respectively. All experiments were performed at a stirring speed of 150 rpm using polytetrafluoroethylene magnetic stirring in artificial saliva solutions with and without lactic acid at 37 °C.
Polarization curves were carried out after the OCP measurements, at a scan rate of 1 mV·s−1, from a potential of −250 mV, up to a potential of 250 mV with respect to its free corrosion potential (Ecorr). In order to further study the physical and chemical properties on the surface of the samples, EIS was also measured. The range of scan frequency was set from 0.1 Hz to 100 KHz. The EIS tests were repeated thrice for each specimen to guarantee the repeatability of the results.

3.5. Corrosion Morphology

After immersion in artificial saliva with and without lactic acid solutions for 14 days, the samples were taken out. Prior to characterizing the morphologies of corrosion, the samples were carefully washed with distilled water and then fixed by 15 min immersion in 2.5% glutaraldehyde. In order to better compare with the results of the subsequent studies in the presence of oral microorganisms, the samples were also dehydrated in a series of aqueous ethanol solutions (15%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 95% and 100%) for 15 min for sterilization; then, the surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (FEI Quanta 200, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).

4. Conclusions

The corrosion behavior of titanium in artificial saliva with and without lactic acid has been investigated by means of pH tests, OCP, Tafel, EIS, SEM, etc. The main conclusions can be drawn as follows:
(1)
The corrosion of titanium in artificial saliva will result in a slight decrease in the pH value of the solution. Additionally, the corrosion increases with increasing the immersion time.
(2)
The addition of lactic acid into artificial saliva solutions can distinctly accelerate the corrosion rate, and the corrosion of titanium is aggravated with increasing the amount of lactic acid.
(3)
SEM indicates that lactic acid can accelerate the pitting corrosion in artificial saliva.
(4)
Lactic acid is apt to form a chelate compound ([Ti(OH)3]·L), which dissolves in water. The formation of [Ti(OH)3]·L accelerates the dissolution of passivation film (TiO2) on titanium, and this causes the deficiency of the protective film, leading to a tendency of pitting corrosion.
(5)
The addition of lactic acid does change the mechanism, but accelerates the pitting corrosion.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Chinese Natural Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 51361028, 51161025, 21162036 and 20762014.

Author Contributions

Qing Qu arranged the funding and infrastructure for the project, Lei Wang, Yajun Chen, Lei Li and Yue He performed experiments, analyzed the data, Qing Qu, Lei Wang and Lei Li wrote the paper. Zhongtao Ding supervised the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cremasco, A.; Osório, W.R.; Freire, C.M.A.; Garcia, A.; Caram, R. Electrochemical corrosion behavior of a Ti-35Nb alloy. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 4867–4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ohkubo, C.; Hanatani, S.; Hosoi, T. Present status of titanium removable dentures—A review of the literature. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2008, 35, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fonseca, C.; Barbosa, M.A. Corrosion behavior of titanium in biofluids containing H2O2 studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Corros. Sci. 2001, 43, 547–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Long, M.; Rack, H.J. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement—A materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998, 19, 1621–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Williams, D.F. Biocompatibility of clinical implant materials. In Biocompatibility of Clinical Implant Materials; Williams, D.F., Ed.; Volume 1, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1981; pp. 9–44. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pan, J.; Thierry, D.; Leygraf, C. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study of the passive oxide film on titanium for implant application. Electrochim. Acta 1996, 41, 1143–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kovacs, P.; Davidson, J.A. Chemical and electrochemical aspects of the biocompatibility of titanium and its alloys. In ASTM STP 1272 The Material and Biological Issues; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1996; pp. 163–178. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mareci, D.; Ungureanu, G.; Aelenei, D.; Mirza Rosca, J.C. Electrochemical characteristics of titanium based biomaterials in artificial saliva. Mater. Corros. 2007, 11, 848–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Strietzel, R.; Hosch, A.; Kalbfleisch, H.; Buch, D. In vitro corrosion of titanium. Biomaterials 1998, 19, 1495–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hanawa, T.; Kon, M.; Ohkawa, S.; Asaoka, K. Diffusion of elements in porcelain into titanium oxide. Dent. Mater. J. 1994, 13, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Esposito, M.; Lausmaa, J.; Hirsch, J.M.; Thomsen, P. Surface analysis of failed oral titanium implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1999, 48, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lopez, M.F.; Jimenez, J.A.; Gutierrez, A. Corrosion study of surface-modified vanadium-free titanium alloys. Electrochim. Acta 2003, 48, 1395–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dearnley, P.A.; Dahm, K.L.; Cimenoǧlu, H. The corrosion-wear behavior of thermally oxidised CP-Ti and Ti–6Al–4V. Wear 2004, 256, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Velten, D.; Biehl, V.; Aubertin, F.; Valeske, B.; Possart, W.; Breme, J. Preparation of TiO2 layers on cp-Ti and Ti6Al4V by thermal and anodic oxidation and by sol-gel coating techniques and their characterization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 59, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Merritt, K.; Rodrigo, J.J. Immune response to synthetic materials. Sensitization of patients receiving orthopaedic implants. Clin. Orthop. 1996, 326, 71–79. [Google Scholar]
  16. Urban, R.M.; Jacobs, J.J.; Tomlinson, M.J.; Gavrilovic, J.; Black, J.; Peoch, M. Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am. 2000, 82, 457–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lalor, P.A.; Revell, P.A.; Gray, A.B.; Wright, S.; Railton, G.T.; Freeman, M.A. Sensitivity to titanium. A cause of implant failure? J. Bone Joint. Surg. Br. 1991, 73B, 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  18. Abdallah, H.I.; Balsara, R.K.; O’Riordan, A.C. Pacemaker contact sensitivity: clinical recognition and management. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1994, 57, 1017–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yamauchi, R.; Morita, A.; Tsuji, T. Pacemaker dermatitis from titanium. Contact Dermatitis 2000, 42, 52–53. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Basketter, D.A.; Whittle, E.; Monk, B. Possible allergy to complex titanium salt. Contact Dermatitis 2000, 42, 310–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pohler, O.E.M. Unalloyed titanium for implants in bone surgery. Injury 2000, 31, D7–D13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Green, T.; Machtei, E.; Horwitz, J.; Peled, M. Fracture of dental implants: Literature review and report of a case. Implant. Dent. 2002, 11, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Grimsdottir, M.R.; Hensten-Pettersen, A. Cytotoxic and antibacterial effects of orthodontic appliances. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 1993, 101, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Mabilleau, G.; Bourdon, S.; Joly-Guillou, M.L.; Filmon, R.; Baslé, M.F.; Chappard, D. Influence of fluoride, hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid on the corrosion resistance of commercially pure titanium. Acta Biomater. 2006, 2, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Koike, M.; Nakamura, S.; Fujii, H. In vitro assessment of release from titanium by immersion tests. J. Jpn. Prosthodont. Soc. 1997, 41, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Koike, M.; Fujii, H. In vitro assessment of corrosive properties of titanium as a biomaterial. J. Oral Rehabil. 2001, 28, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Masatoshi, T.; Masafumi, K.; Yukyo, T. Corrosion behavior of Ti-Ag alloys used in dentistry in lactic acid solution. Met. Mater. Int. 2011, 17, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Koike, M.; Fujii, H. The corrosion resistance of pure titanium in organic acids. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 2931–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mansfeld, F.; Kending, M.W.; Tsai, S. Recording and analysis of A.C. impedance data for corrosion studies. I. Background and methods of analysis. Corrosion 1981, 37, 301–307. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tanno, K.; Itoh, M.; Sekiya, H.; Yashiro, H.; Kumagai, N. The corrosion inhibition of carbon steel in lithium bromide solution by hydroxide and molybdate at moderate temperatures. Corros. Sci. 1993, 34, 1453–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mansfeld, F. The interaction of bacteria and metal surfaces. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 7670–7680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tian, B.; Xie, D.B.; Wang, F.H. Corrosion behavior of TiN and TiN/Ti composite films on Ti6Al4V alloy in Hank’s solution. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2009, 39, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Balakrishnan, A.; Lee, B.C.; Kim, T.N.; Panigrahi, B.B. Corrosion behaviour of ultra fine grained titanium in simulated body fluid for implant application. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs. 2008, 22, 58–64. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fekry, A.M. The influence of chloride and sulphate ions on the corrosion behavior of Ti and Ti-6Al-4V in oxalic acid. Electrochem. Acta 2009, 54, 3480–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Y.J. Effect of Streptococcus Sanguis and Lactic Acid on the Corrosion Behavior of Titanium. Ph.D. Thesis, Yunnan University, Kunming, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qu, Q.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, L.; He, Y.; Ding, Z. Corrosion Behavior of Titanium in Artificial Saliva by Lactic Acid. Materials 2014, 7, 5528-5542. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7085528

AMA Style

Qu Q, Wang L, Chen Y, Li L, He Y, Ding Z. Corrosion Behavior of Titanium in Artificial Saliva by Lactic Acid. Materials. 2014; 7(8):5528-5542. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7085528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qu, Qing, Lei Wang, Yajun Chen, Lei Li, Yue He, and Zhongtao Ding. 2014. "Corrosion Behavior of Titanium in Artificial Saliva by Lactic Acid" Materials 7, no. 8: 5528-5542. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7085528

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop