Next Article in Journal
A Computational Thermodynamics-Assisted Development of Sn-Bi-In-Ga Quaternary Alloys as Low-Temperature Pb-Free Solders
Previous Article in Journal
A Double Barrier Technique with Hydrotalcites for Pb Immobilisation from Electric Arc Furnace Dust
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of Granite Cutting Waste on The Properties of Ultra-High Performance Concrete

by
Íñigo López Boadella
1,
Fernando López Gayarre
1,*,
Jesús Suárez González
1,
José Manuel Gómez-Soberón
2,
Carlos López-Colina Pérez
1,
Miguel Serrano López
1 and
Jorge de Brito
3
1
Campus de Gijón, Department of Construction and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Oviedo, 33203 Asturias, Spain
2
Department of Architecture Technology, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Avda Diagonal 649, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
3
CERIS, Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Georresources, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(4), 634; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040634
Submission received: 28 January 2019 / Revised: 9 February 2019 / Accepted: 15 February 2019 / Published: 20 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Building Materials)

Abstract

:
This study analyzes the effect of using waste by-products generated in the process of granite cutting as part of the granular structure of Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC). The manufactured concrete has a compressive strength greater than 115 MPa. This study substitutes 35%, 70% and 100% of the volume of micronized quartz powder (<40 μm) with granite cutting waste. This is an innovative study where the feasibility of using waste from granite quarries as a replacement for micronized quartz in UHPC has been analyzed. The results show an improvement in the workability and compressive strength of UHPC, for all substitution ratios. The flexural strength and tensile strength increase when the substitution ratio is 35%, and even the values obtained for 100% substitution are acceptable. In view of the results obtained in this study, granite cutting waste, instead of the micronized quartz powder usually used, is a viable alternative for the manufacture of expectedly more sustainable UHPC.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, the overexploitation of natural resources has reached unsustainable levels. Overexploitation depletes resources, destroys natural habitats and pollutes the environment. The hole in the ozone layer and the greenhouse effect are two of the most serious results. For these reasons, the European Union (EU) is enforcing policies to reduce the impact of waste materials on the environment while improving the efficiency of resource management within the common territory. In 1973, the EU launched a corrective policy, called the Environment Action Program, currently in its seventh edition [1].
The cement and concrete industries are among the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions. In order to improve the sustainability of the building sector with more environmentally friendly concrete, studies are being carried out using recycled materials or by-products from the building sector as partial or total replacements of natural aggregates in the manufacture of Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC).
Soliman and Tagnit Hamou [2] studied the effect of using glass waste as partial or total substitutes of quartz sand in UHPC. For a 50% ratio, an UHPC with a workability and compressive strength similar to those of the reference concrete can be obtained. Also, an UHPC with a very dense microstructure is achieved. Zegardlo et al. [3] and Gonzalez-Corominas and Etxeberria [4] analyzed the influence of using ceramic recycled aggregates on the properties of UHPC and high-performance concrete (HPC). They found an increase in the compression strength of 24% and an increase in the tensile strength of 34% of the UHPC, when 100% of sand was replaced with recycled ceramic waste, and improved properties of the HPC up to 30% replacement of fine aggregate with ceramic waste.
Al-Jabri et al. [5] and Ambily et al. [6], studied the use of copper slag as substitute of fine aggregates, while Zhu et al. [7] used iron ore tailings. The results obtained in these studies show a promising future for the use of industrial by-products in the manufacture of HPC or UHPC. On the other hand, the results obtained by Al-Jabri et al. [5] showed an improvement in the properties of HPC when the content of copper slag increased. For a ratio of 100%, there are increases of 22% in compressive strength, 27% in flexural strength and 19% in tensile strength.
UHPC is a promising building material with great compressive strength and excellent behavior against flexural stresses when short steel fibres are added. The Association Française de Génie Civil differentiates them from HPC, since they have a compressive strength higher than 150 MPa, although this limit is only indicative and when failure occurs it is not brittle due to the presence of different types of fibre [8]. Generally, concrete with a compressive strength higher than 100 MPa can be considered UHPC. Orgass and Klug [9] observed that when the content of fibres increases, the flexural strength of UHPC increases proportionally. In addition, ductile post-cracking behavior was observed. The results of Wu et al. [10] are in the same line. With an addition of the 3% steel fibres, they achieved a compressive strength above 150 MPa and a flexural strength greater than 35 MPa. Park et al. [11] reported an improvement in the post-cracking flexural properties of UHPC with an increase of the fibres length.
However, it is not an ecologically sustainable material as it requires high cement contents, resulting in high energy consumption. Accordingly, the development of more sustainable concrete, incorporating materials that require lower energy consumption in the manufacturing process, is currently being exploited. This can be achieved by reusing industrial by-products. In this regard, Pyo and Kim [12] studied the feasibility of incorporating different types of industrial by-products in UHPC. The results showed that it is possible to replace micronized quartz with coal bottom ash and fly ash with no significant loss of workability or of compressive strength. By using blast furnace slag, as a partial substitute of cement or silica fume, the UHPC workability is improved without affecting its compressive strength. Pyo et al. [13] studied the feasibility of using fly ash or blast furnace slag as partial substitutes of cement. They observed that the mechanical properties of UHPC, with a substitution ratio of 30% of blast furnace slag, were similar to those of the reference concrete. However, when they used fly ash, a decrease in the mechanical properties of UHPC was observed. In this line, Randl el al. [14] obtained compressive strength similar to that of the reference concrete for a 45% replacement ratio of cement with extra fine blast furnace slag. The use of a 45% of fly ash caused a loss of 25%.
Following the same line of research, Ghafari et al. [15] evaluated the influence of the replacement of silica fume with fly ash or blast furnace slag on autogenous shrinkage. The results showed that for 50% and 100% ratios the autogenous shrinkage falls due to a decrease in the number of fine pores. Yazici et al. [16] investigated the effect of fly ash and blast furnace slag on the compressive strength of reactive powder concrete cured in autoclave. The results show that, by using fly ash and/or blast furnace slag, the content of cement and silica fume can be reduced. In addition, by reducing the content of silica fume, the superplasticizer content is considerably reduced.
Edwin et al. [17] investigated the use of copper slag in contents of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% of cement weight. The results show an improvement of the mortar’s workability as the copper slag content increases. In terms of compressive strength at 90 days, the results are comparable or even better than those of the reference concrete. Also, with the replacement of cement with copper slag, the hydration of the cement pastes can be slowed.
The use of micronized quartz (crystalline silica) in the manufacture of UHPC reduces the cement content and completes the size grading curve in the smallest sizes, thanks to the size of its particles (<40 μm). The packing density of the matrix is thus increased, achieving greater concrete compactness, stability and durability. However, the utilization of micronized quartz, (not unlike the use of silica fume), has a high energy cost and increases the CO2 footprint due to the grinding process. It can also cause serious health problems, such as silicosis [18]. Various studies have been carried out to find alternative materials. For example, Burroughs et al. [19] analyzed the effect of substituting silica powder with limestone filler. Although a loss of strength was observed, it was less than 6% for a substitution ratio of 100%. Soliman and Tagnit Hamou [20] managed to improve the workability of UHPC and increase its compressive strength when 100% of micronized quartz was replaced with glass powder. This is due to an improvement in the packing density and to the high strength and modulus of elasticity of the glass particles. The results of Vaitkevicius et al. [21] are in the same line. For a replacement ratio of 100% of micronized quartz, they achieved a compressive strength of 221 MPa, compared to 182 MPa of the reference concrete.
For all these reasons, and because the mining industry sector is second only to the building sector in the amount of waste it generates [22], this study explores the viability of using waste from a granite quarry as a partial or total substitute of micronized quartz to produce expectedly more sustainable UHPC. It is an innovative study since so far this type of waste has not been used in the manufacture of UHPC.

2. Experimental Study

2.1. Materials

The cement used was CEM I 42.5 R/SR. Table 1 summarizes its main features. Two silica sands with size fractions of 0/0.5 mm and 0.5/1.6 mm were used. As additions, densified silica fume, with an average particle size of 0.15 μm and micronized quartz powder with an average particle size of 20 μm were used. To achieve optimal workability, two types of polycarboxylate superplasticizers were used. The superplasticizers used were ViscoCrete-225 Powder (Sika, Madrid, Spain) and Basf MasterEase 5025 (Basf, Barcelona, Spain). The short steel fibres used in this study had a diameter of 0.2 mm and a length of 13 mm. Finally, granite powder waste (FG), with an average particle size of 20 μm, obtained from the cutting process of granite blocks was used as a supplementary material (Figure 1a,b). Table 2 summarizes the properties of the materials used. The densities shown there were determined using a helium pycnometer. Figure 2a,b highlight the differences in size between powder and sands and show the size distribution of the powder materials. The chemical composition of micronized quartz and FG was determined by X-ray fluorescence analysis. Table 3 shows the corresponding results.

2.2. UHPC Design

To carry out this study, a reference mix was designed that ensures a self-compacting fresh concrete with a compressive strength above 115 MPa. Once the characteristics of the reference concrete were verified, 35%, 70% and 100% of the micronized quartz was replaced by the same volume of granite powder. Table 4 shows the composition of each manufactured UHPC, in kg/m3.

2.3. Experimental Program

The experimental program includes four mixes. The first one is the reference UHPC. The rest of the mixes correspond to the UHPC with different contents of granite waste (Table 4).
The manufacturing procedure was as follows: First, the two silica sands were introduced into the mixer. Next, micronized quartz or the granite powder was added, then silica fume, and finally cement. Once all the dry materials were in the mixer, they were mixed for 30 s before the water was added. Mixing continued for two more minutes, after which the superplasticizer was added and, finally, the steel fibres. The final mixing lasted 25 min.
12 specimens of each of the five mixes were manufactured according to the UNE-EN 12390-1 standard [23]: Three 15 cm × 30 cm cylindrical specimens, three 10 cm × 10 cm × 10 cm cubic specimens and three 10 cm × 10 cm × 4 0 cm prismatic specimens. The specimens were cured for 28 days as specified in UNE-EN 12390-2 [24].
The consistency of fresh UHPC [25], its density [26], modulus of elasticity [27], compression strength [28], flexural strength [25] and tensile strength [25] were determined. To determine consistency, a truncated cone mould with 200 mm and 130 mm in diameter, and 200 mm in height was used. These sizes are slightly larger than those recommended in NF P18-470. The modulus of elasticity, compressive strength, flexural strength and tensile strength were calculated after the 28-day curing process in a wet chamber with a temperature between 20 ± 2 °C and a relative humidity higher than 95%. These calculations are described in detail in the following section.

3. Analysis of the Results

3.1. Workability

The workability of UHPC was determined after the mixing process. Figure 3 shows an increase in the workability of UHPC when granite waste replaces micronized quartz. Also, the workability improves as the replacement ratio increases, up to a point. The highest value is obtained for the 70% ratio. The mixes with a 100% replacement of micronized quartz with granite waste had a slump value equal to that of the reference concrete. This may be due to the more rounded shape of the granite cutting waste particles, although when the substitution ratio is 100% the compactness of UHPC falls. This increase in the workability of UHPC is in line with the results obtained by Soliman [20,29], where the incorporation of glass powder as a substitute for micronized quartz or silica fume improves the workability of UHPC.

3.2. Density of the Hardened UHPC

The density of the hardened UHPC was measured after 28 days. Figure 4 shows the values obtained for the different replacement ratios. A slight reduction in the density of the UHPC with granite waste is observed relative to the reference UHPC, although the values are very similar. This may be due to the smaller specific surface of the granite powder particles, increasing the effective water and the slump and, therefore, the density of the UHPC is slightly smaller than that of the reference concrete. The variation between the 35% and 100% replacements is less than 1.5%. These variations can be due to the variability in the results obtained, as seen in Figure 4 (error bars). Summing up, the substitution ratio of the granite cutting waste has no impact on the density of UHPC.

3.3. Compressive Strength

The results shown in Figure 5 correspond to the average strength from a series of three specimens corresponding to each of the different replacement ratios. There is an increase in the average compressive strength in all the mixes with granite waste. This increase in compressive strength oscillates between 8.5%, for ratios of 35% and 70% and 4.5% for 100%. These slight increases can be due to the better compactness of the mixes when the granite cutting waste is incorporated. Again, the results (35%, 70% and 100%) are within the expected error of the test and, although the compressive strength is slightly higher, the substitution ratios have no great influence on the compressive strength. Since the hardness of micronized quartz and granite waste is similar, the increase in the compressive strength may be due to a greater compactness of the concrete, as the mixes with granite waste have greater fluidity than the reference UHPC. It may also be due to the greater number of finer particles present in the granite waste.
These slight increases, in the compressive strength of UHPC are in agreement with the results of Soliman [20] and Vaitkevicius [21]. In the first case, replacing 100% micronized quartz with glass powder produced an increase in long-term resistance greater than 12%. Vaitkevicius [21] observed that the substitution of 100% of micronized quartz with glass powder increased the compressive strength by more than 20%.

3.4. Modulus of Elasticity

The tests to determine the modulus of elasticity were carried out after 28 days. Three 15 cm × 30 cm cylindrical specimens were used per replacement level. Figure 6 shows the influence of granite waste on the modulus of elasticity of UHPC. First, a reduction in the modulus of elasticity of the UHPC with granite waste is observed with respect to the average value obtained for the reference UHPC. However, the variation that is produced is very small, less than 5%. The results obtained were not expected. They can be attributed to the fact that the variability of the results predominates over the variability of the variable analyzed (% substitution).
Regarding this, variations between the results obtained in different studies have been observed. The results of Yazıcı [30] show a reduction of the modulus of elasticity of UHPC when incorporating fly ash or blast furnace slag. This decrease is attributed to a loss of stiffness. However, the studies of Pyo et al. [12] and Safiuddin et al. [31] show an increase in the modulus of elasticity when different types of industrial by-products were incorporated. Safiuddin et al. [31] attributed this increase in modulus of elasticity to a micro-filler effect and a reduction in the porosity of HPC produced by the industrial by-products.

3.5. Flexural Strength

The results shown in Figure 7 correspond to the average of the results from a series of three specimens manufactured per replacement ratio. The scatter in the results can be due to the random distribution, probably non-uniform, of the fibres in the mix. The average flexural strength is gradually reduced as the granite waste content in the UHPC increases. For the 35% ratio there is an increase in flexural strength of 6% relative to the reference UHPC. This increase is possibly due to a better adherence between the granite waste and the cement paste, as a consequence of the irregular shape of the granite particles. However, for the other ratios, there is a loss of flexural strength. This may be due to an increase in the amount of effective water as the percentage of substitution increases because the specific surface of the FG is less than that of the micronized quartz. When the replacement ratio is 70%, the flexural strength is practically equal to that of the reference UHPC. In any case, the variations are small and due to the variability of the experimental results. All of them fall within the expected error of the test, as seen in Figure 8. The results of flexural strength show a similar behaviour to those obtained by Wu et al. [32].

3.6. Tensile Strength

The parameters necessary to determine the tensile strength of UHPC resulted from the stress-strain curves (Figure 8), obtained when performing the flexural tests for each substitution ratio. The key points of stress-strain curves are the following [33].
P1 is defined as the intersection between straight S75, with a slope equal to 0.75 of the slope of the elastic zone of the stress-strain curve passing through the origin, and the stress-strain curve. P1 is defined by parameters δ75 and σ75. P2 is defined as the intersection between straight S40, with a slope equal to 0.40 of the slope of the elastic zone of the stress-strain curve passing through the origin, and the stress-strain curve. P2 is defined by parameters δ40 and σ40. P3 is defined as the point of the ascending branch at which the equivalent stress is 97% of the maximum stress. P3 is defined by parameters δloc and σloc.
Once the key points of the stress-strain curve are defined, the model of tensile behaviour of the concrete is determined.
E = 2.40   h   m
f t = σ 75 1.63 ( σ 75 σ 40 ) 0.19
ε t , u = f t E ( 7.65   δ l o c δ 75 10.53 )
ε t ,   e l = f t / E
α = ε t , u / ε t , e l
f t , u = α 0.18 ( 2.46   σ l o c σ 75 1.76 ) f t ,
where m is the slope of the elastic region of the stress–strain curve; h is the thickness of the specimen, in mm; E is the modulus of elasticity; ft is the crack resistance of the matrix reinforced with fibres; ft,u is the ultimate tensile strength; εt,u is the peak deformation
Figure 9 shows the results obtained. Again, a gradual decrease in strength can be seen when the percentage of granite waste increases. So, for a 35% ratio, there is an increase in the tensile strength of 24%, while for 70% it is only 5%. However, for 100% ratio, the results obtained are similar to that of the reference UHPC. As the error bars show, the high value for 35% may be due to the variability of the experimental results. These good results obtained for the UHPC with granite waste may be due to the better adhesion with the cement paste, as a consequence of the more irregular shape of the granite particles and the presence of the short steel fibres. Also, because these values have been obtained indirectly, through the flexural test the same trend can be seen here. The variation seen for the different levels of substitution may be due to the random nature of the distribution of the fibres in the UHPC.
These results are in line with those obtained by Aldahdooh et al. [34], who used palm oil fuel ash as a partial substitute of cement. The results show an increase in strength up to 50% ratio, when a significant loss occurs. However, a loss of tensile strength when palm oil fuel ash replaces silica fume can be seen. These results are attributed to the higher SiO2 content in silica fume compared to cement and palm oil fuel ash.
The previous sections indicate that the replacement of micronized quartz with granite waste improves the mechanical behavior, especially the compressive strength. This is probably due to physical issues related to an improvement in compactness due to better distribution of particle sizes. To validate this hypothesis, observations of the microstructure of the samples were made by SEM. It can be observed that in the reference UHPC (Figure 10a), cracks of significant thickness and size are identified, as well as a large interface transition zone (ITZ) that runs in the contour of the steel fibres. Finally, the identified pores have a diameter between 30 μm and 55 μm. However, when the granite waste content reaches 70%, (Figure 10b) and 100% (Figure 10c), micro-cracks that run in the mortar paste are identified. The ITZ has a reduced thickness, it is continuing and follows the roughness of the profile of the surrounding element, both of the aggregate and of the fibre. As for the pores, they increase in number and size.

4. Conclusions

Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) has been manufactured using granite cutting waste and the results obtained open the possibility of their use as partial substitutes of the granular skeleton of the concrete.
In some cases, the properties suffer slight increases relative to the reference concrete and in others the variation is so small than the waste incorporation does not influence the analyzed property. The most important conclusions are summarized next.
The workability of UHPC increases as the granite powder waste content is increased. This improvement in the workability of concrete may be due to the lower demand for water by the granite fines, which increases the effective amount of water.
The incorporation of granite cutting waste has no impact on the density of UHPC. The variations are very small, and they are due to the variability of the experimental results.
The greater workability of UHPC as the granite fines content increases favours the compactness of concrete and increases the compressive strength of mixes with granite powder waste. The highest compressive strength is obtained in the 35-70% ratio, with an increment of 9%, although between 3% to 4% can be due to the scatter as result of the random distribution of the fibres.
Regarding the modulus of elasticity, although the results were not as expected, the variability of the results fall within of the expected error and again this property is not clearly affected by the substitution ratio.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.L.B., F.L.G.; Investigation, F.L.G., I.L.B., J.S.G., J.M.G.-S., C.L.-C.P., M.S.L., J.B.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, I.L.B., F.L.G., J.M.G.-S., C.L.-C.P., M.S.L.; Writing—Review & Editing, I.L.B., F.L.G., C.L.-C.P., M.S.L., J.B.; Supervision, J.B., F.L.G.; Project Administration, F.L.G.

Funding

This work has been financially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the research project grant number BIA2016-78460-C3-2-R.

Acknowledgments

The authors also want to thank the support to carry out this study to ArcelorMittal, Elkem, Basf, Sika AG, Granites Cabaleiro S.L. and the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Government of Spain. The support of CERIS research centre and Instituto Superior Técnico is also acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Union. Decision 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 ‘Living well, within the limits of our planet’. Off. J. Eur. Union, Decision 1386 2013, 171–200. [Google Scholar]
  2. Soliman, N.A.; Tagnit-Hamou, A. Using glass sand as an alternative for quartz sand in UHPC. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 145, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zegardlo, B.; Szelag, M.; Ogrodnik, P. Ultra-high strength concrete made with recycled aggregate from sanitary ceramic wastes—The method of production and the interfacial transition zone. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 122, 736–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gonzalez-Corominas, A.; Etxeberria, M. Properties of high performance concrete made with recycled fine ceramic and coarse mixed aggregates. Constr. Build. Mate. Rials. 2014, 68, 618–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al-Jabri, K.S.; Hisada, M.; Al-Saidy, A.H.; Al-Oraimi, S.K. Performance of high strength concrete made with copper slag as a fine aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 2132–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ambily, P.S.; Umarani, C.; Ravisankar, K.; Prem, P.R.; Bharatkumar, B.H.; Iyer, N.R. Studies on ultra high performance concrete incorporating copper slag as fine aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 77, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, Z.G.; Li, B.X.; Zhou, M.K. The influences of iron ore tailings as fine aggregate on the strength of ultra-high performance concrete. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 2015, 412878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Association Française de Génie Civil (AFGC); Service D’études Techniques des Routes et Autoroutes (SETRA). Bétons Fibrés à Ultra-Hautes Performances, Recommandations Provisoires; AFGC: Paris, France, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  9. Orgass, M.; Klug, Y. Fibre reinforced ultra-high strength concretes. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete, Kassel, Germany, 13–15 September 2004; Kassel University Press: Kassel, Germany, 2004; pp. 637–647. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu, Z.; Shi, C.; He, W.; Wu, L. Effects of steel fibre content and shape on me-chanical properties of ultra high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 103, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, J.J.; Yoo, D.Y.; Park, G.J.; Kim, S.W. Feasibility of reducing the fibre content in ultra-high-performance fibre-reinforced concrete under flexure. Materials 2017, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pyo, S.; Kim, H.K. Fresh and hardened properties of ultra-high performance concrete incorporating coal bottom ash and slag powder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 131, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, R.; Spiesz, P.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Development of an eco-friendly ultra-high per-formance concrete (UHPC) with efficient cement and mineral admixtures uses. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2015, 55, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Randl, N.; Steiner, T.; Ofner, S.; Baumgartner, E.; Meszoly, T. Development of UHPC mixtures from an ecological point of view. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 67, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ghafari, E.; Ghahari, S.A.; Costa, H.; Julio, E.; Portugal, A.; Duraes, L. Effect of supple-mentary cementitious materials on autogenous shrinkage of ultra-high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 127, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yazici, H.; Yigiter, H.; Karabulut, A.S.; Baradan, B. Utilization of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag as an alternative silica source in reactive powder concrete. Fuel 2008, 87, 2401–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Edwin, R.S.; de Schepper, M.; Gruyaert, E.; de Belie, N. Effect of secondary copper slag as cementitious material in ultra-high performance mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 119, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kang, S.H.; Jeong, Y.; Tan, K.H.; Moon, J. The use of limestone to replace physical filler o fquartz poder in UHPFRC. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 94, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Burroughs, J.F.; Shannon, J.; Rushing, T.S.; Yi, K.; Gutierrez, Q.B.; Harrelson, D.W. Potential of finely ground limestone powder to benefit ultra-high performance concrete mixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 141, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Soliman, N.A.; Tagnit-Hamou, A. Development of ultra-high-performance concrete using glass powder—towards ecofriendly concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 600–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vaitkevicius, V.; Serelis, E.; Hilbig, H. The effect of glass powder on the microstructure of ultra high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 68, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. European Commission. Statistics on Waste—Statistics Explained. 2018. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Waste_statistics (accessed on 20 February 2019).
  23. UNE-EN 12390-1. Testing Hardened Concrete, Part 1: Shape, Dimensions and other Requirements for Specimens and Moulds; AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  24. UNE-EN 12390-2. Testing Hardened Concrete, Part 2: Making and Curing Specimens for Strength Test; AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  25. NF P18-470. Bétons. Bétons Fibrés à Ultra Hautes Performances. Spécification, Performance, Production et conformité; AFNOR: Saint-Denis, France, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  26. UNE-EN 12390-7. Testing Hardened Concrete, Part 7: Density of Hardened Concrete; AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  27. UNE-EN 12390-13. Testing Hardened Concrete, Part 13: Determination of Secant Modulus of Elasticity in Compression; AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. UNE-EN 12390-3. Testing Hardened Concrete, Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens; AENOR: Madrid, Spain, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  29. Soliman, N.A.; Tagnit-Hamou, A. Partial substitution of silica fume with fine glass powder in UHPC: Filling the micro gap. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 139, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yazıcı, H.; Yardımcı, M.Y.; Aydın, S.; Karabulut, A.Ş. Mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete containing mineral admixtures under different curing regimes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Safiuddin, M.; Raman, S.; Zain, M. Effects of medium temperature and industrial by-products on the key hardened properties of high performance concrete. Materials 2015, 8, 8608–8623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wu, Z.; Shi, C.; He, W. Comparative study on flexural properties of ultra-high performance concrete with supplementary cementitious materials under different curing regimes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 136, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martínez, J.L. Characterisation of the Tensile Behavior of Uhpfrc by Means of Four-Point Bending Tests. Ph.D. Thesis, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  34. Aldahdooh, M.A.A.; Bunnori, N.M.; Johari, M.A.M. Influence of palm oil fuel ash on ultimate flexural and uniaxial tensile strength of green ultra-high performance fibre reinforced cementitious composites. Mater. Des. 2014, 54, 694–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Granite powder waste production. (a) Granite quarry; (b) process of cutting granite blocks.
Figure 1. Granite powder waste production. (a) Granite quarry; (b) process of cutting granite blocks.
Materials 12 00634 g001
Figure 2. Size distribution. (a) Granite powder, micronized quartz and silica fume; (b) coarse and fine sand.
Figure 2. Size distribution. (a) Granite powder, micronized quartz and silica fume; (b) coarse and fine sand.
Materials 12 00634 g002aMaterials 12 00634 g002b
Figure 3. Slump of UHPC.
Figure 3. Slump of UHPC.
Materials 12 00634 g003
Figure 4. Density of UHPC.
Figure 4. Density of UHPC.
Materials 12 00634 g004
Figure 5. Compressive strength of UHPC.
Figure 5. Compressive strength of UHPC.
Materials 12 00634 g005
Figure 6. Modulus of elasticity of UHPC.
Figure 6. Modulus of elasticity of UHPC.
Materials 12 00634 g006
Figure 7. Flexural strength of UHPC.
Figure 7. Flexural strength of UHPC.
Materials 12 00634 g007
Figure 8. Stress–strain curves and key points.
Figure 8. Stress–strain curves and key points.
Materials 12 00634 g008
Figure 9. Tensile strength of UHPC.
Figure 9. Tensile strength of UHPC.
Materials 12 00634 g009
Figure 10. SEM-BEC images of reference concrete (a) with 70% (b) and 100% (c) granite waste; Sf Steel fibre, P–pore, A–Aggregate, F–Fissure.
Figure 10. SEM-BEC images of reference concrete (a) with 70% (b) and 100% (c) granite waste; Sf Steel fibre, P–pore, A–Aggregate, F–Fissure.
Materials 12 00634 g010aMaterials 12 00634 g010b
Table 1. Cement properties.
Table 1. Cement properties.
CEM I 42.5 R-SR
L.O.I. ≤5.0%
Insoluble residue ≤5.0%
Sulphates≤3.5%
Chlorides≤0.10%
2-day compressive strength20.0 MPa
28-day compressive strength≥42.5 MPa
≥62.5 MPa
Initial setting≥45 min
Le Chatelier expansion10 mm
Table 2. Materials properties.
Table 2. Materials properties.
PropertySilica FumeMicronized QuartzGranite PowderSand 0/0.5 mmSand 0.5/1.6 mm
Density (kg/m3)23002609263326162616
Absorption at 24 h (%)---0.280.53
Sand equivalent, SE (10)---9797
Humidity (%)<3.00<0.200.000.000.00
Table 3. Chemical composition (%) of micronized quartz and granite powder.
Table 3. Chemical composition (%) of micronized quartz and granite powder.
SpecimenSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3MnOMgOCaONa2OK2OTiO2P2O5L.O.I
Micronized quartz>99.30.260.05--0.02-0.040.05--
Granite powder76.3311.872.000.020.210.432.955.050.130.020.77
Table 4. UHPC composition (kg/m3).
Table 4. UHPC composition (kg/m3).
MaterialReference35% FG70% FG100% FG
Cement800800800800
Sand 0/0.5302302302302
Sand 0.5/1.6565565565565
Micronized quartz22514668-
Silica fume175175175175
Granite powder-79158225
Water175175175175
Superplasticizer10101010
Steel fibres160160160160

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López Boadella, Í.; López Gayarre, F.; Suárez González, J.; Gómez-Soberón, J.M.; López-Colina Pérez, C.; Serrano López, M.; de Brito, J. The Influence of Granite Cutting Waste on The Properties of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Materials 2019, 12, 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040634

AMA Style

López Boadella Í, López Gayarre F, Suárez González J, Gómez-Soberón JM, López-Colina Pérez C, Serrano López M, de Brito J. The Influence of Granite Cutting Waste on The Properties of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Materials. 2019; 12(4):634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040634

Chicago/Turabian Style

López Boadella, Íñigo, Fernando López Gayarre, Jesús Suárez González, José Manuel Gómez-Soberón, Carlos López-Colina Pérez, Miguel Serrano López, and Jorge de Brito. 2019. "The Influence of Granite Cutting Waste on The Properties of Ultra-High Performance Concrete" Materials 12, no. 4: 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop