Next Article in Journal
Ga-Based Alloys in Microelectronic Interconnects: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of the Influence of Shielding Gases on Laser Metal Deposition of Inconel 718 Superalloy
Previous Article in Journal
Lifetime Prediction of Polymers: To Bet, or Not to Bet—Is This the Question?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Process Parameter Effects on Biocompatible Thermoplastic Sheets Produced by Incremental Forming
Article Menu
Issue 8 (August) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Materials 2018, 11(8), 1382; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081382

Surface Quality Enhancement of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Printed Samples Based on the Selection of Critical Printing Parameters

1
Department of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, University of Jaén, EPS de Jaén, Campus LasLagunillas, 23071 Jaén, Spain
2
Mechanical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, H.P. 177005, India
3
Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation (TEMA), University of Aveiro, Campus Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 June 2018 / Revised: 2 August 2018 / Accepted: 6 August 2018 / Published: 8 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Special Issue of the Manufacturing Engineering Society (MES))
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2130 KB, uploaded 8 August 2018]   |  

Abstract

The present paper shows an experimental study on additive manufacturing for obtaining samples of polylactic acid (PLA). The process used for manufacturing these samples was fused deposition modeling (FDM). Little attention to the surface quality obtained in additive manufacturing processes has been paid by the research community. So, this paper aims at filling this gap. The goal of the study is the recognition of critical factors in FDM processes for reducing surface roughness. Two different types of experiments were carried out to analyze five printing parameters. The results were analyzed by means of Analysis of Variance, graphical methods, and non-parametric tests using Spearman’s ρ and Kendall’s τ correlation coefficients. The results showed how layer height and wall thickness are the most important factors for controlling surface roughness, while printing path, printing speed, and temperature showed no clear influence on surface roughness. View Full-Text
Keywords: 3D printing; additive manufacturing; ANOVA; correlation coefficients; fused deposition modeling; non-parametric tests; surface roughness 3D printing; additive manufacturing; ANOVA; correlation coefficients; fused deposition modeling; non-parametric tests; surface roughness
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez, M.; Medina-Sánchez, G.; García-Collado, A.; Gupta, M.; Carou, D. Surface Quality Enhancement of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Printed Samples Based on the Selection of Critical Printing Parameters. Materials 2018, 11, 1382.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Materials EISSN 1996-1944 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top