Next Article in Journal
The Biological Fate of Silver Nanoparticles from a Methodological Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
E-Textile Embroidered Metamaterial Transmission Line for Signal Propagation Control
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Wide-Band Circularly Polarized ReflectarrayUsing Graphene-Based Pancharatnam-Berry Phase Unit-Cells for Terahertz Communication

Beijing Key Laboratory of Network System Architecture and Convergence, School of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(6), 956; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060956
Submission received: 2 May 2018 / Revised: 31 May 2018 / Accepted: 1 June 2018 / Published: 5 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Carbon Materials)

Abstract

:
A wide-band and high gain circularly polarized (CP) graphene-based reflectarray operating in the THz regime is proposed and theoretically investigated in this paper. The proposed reflectarray consists of a THz CP source and several graphene-based unit-cells. Taking advantages of the Pancharatnam Berry (PB) phase principle, the graphene-based unit-cell is capable of realizing a tunable phase range of 360° in a wide-band (1.4–1.7 THz) by unit-cell rotating, overcoming the restriction of intrinsic narrow-band resonance in graphene. Therefore, this graphene-based unit-cell exhibits superior bandwidth and phase tunability to its previous counterparts. To demonstrate this, a wide-band (1.4–1.7 THz) focusing metasurface based on the proposed unit-cell that exhibits excellent focusing effect was designed. Then, according to the reversibility of the optical path, a CP reflectarray was realized by placing a wide-band CP THz source at the focal point of the metasurface. Numerical simulation demonstrates that this reflectarray can achieve a stable high gain up to 15 dBic and an axial ratio around 2.1 dB over the 1.4–1.7 THz band. The good radiation performance of the proposed CP reflectarray, as demonstrated, underlines its suitability for the THz communication applications. Moreover, the design principle of this graphene-based reflectarray with a full 360° phase range tunable unit-cells provides a new pathway to design high-performance CP reflectarray in the THz regime.

1. Introduction

Terahertz (THz) science and technology that is undergoing an unprecedented rapid development has attracted considerable attention in the scientific community. As a promising technology, it has enormous potential in applications such as communication [1], sensing [2], imaging [3], detection [4] and spectroscopy [5]. In terms of communication applications, the THz communication system is particularly promising as it has a sufficient bandwidth that is capable of handling high data rate up to 100 Gb/s [6]. Consequently, new requirements for THz antennas have been put forward. Generally, high gain THz antennas are indispensable due to the intrinsic high path loss characteristic of THz waves in free space. Besides, considering the performance deterioration of linearly polarized antennas when they are polarization misaligned, circularly polarized (CP) antennas are often required in scenarios where multi-path effect are prominent. Therefore, high gain CP THz antennas are highly desirable.
Reflectarrays [7,8,9,10,11,12], which consist of an array of passive cells, are well suited for high gain THz applications [13,14]. They combine the merits of both conventional reflect and array antennas, namely, low loss, compact profile, low cross polarization, easy manufacturing, and high efficiency. By controlling the phase distribution on the array surface, the far-field radiation properties can be easily manipulated without bulky and lossy beamforming networks. In terms of CP reflectarray, several CP reflectarrays with excellent performances have been designed at microwave or millimeter wave frequencies [15,16,17,18,19]. It seems that reflectarrays can be chosen as a competitive candidate for high gain and CP THz applications. Nevertheless, most of these reflectarrays rely on judiciously designed metallic structures, which cannot simply scale to the THz frequencies because of the prominent skin effect of the conventional metal.The ohm loss of the metallic will immensely affect the array gain and radiation efficiency. Toavoid these drawbacks brought by the skin effect of metals at THz frequencies, there is a great demand for new types of THz antenna. Fortunately, graphene has several advantages over convention metals at the THz band. It has a high electron mobility up to 230,000 cm2/Vs at room temperature [20], and a low electrical resistivity about 10−6 Ω·cm [21,22] in THz band, demonstrating lower loss than conventional metals. In addition, the surface plasmons resonant frequencies of graphene are quite lower than that in metals, which are often in optical frequencies. Meanwhile, graphene surface plasmons exhibit extremely small wavelengths (λ/10–λ/100) and tight field confinement on the graphene sheet [23,24], while maintaining reasonably small losses in the THz band. Furthermore, the imaginary conductivity of graphene is highly tunable via chemical doping or electrical gating [25,26,27,28,29,30,31] at THz frequencies, which is impossible or inefficient if metals are used. Based on excellent physical properties of graphene at THz frequencies, several graphene-based THz antennas have been reported in recent years [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. It evaluates the feasibility of a fixed beam reflectarray antenna at THz based on graphene and compares its performance to a similar implementation using gold for the first time [42]. Soon after, diverse graphene-based reflectarrays operating at THz frequencies have been proposed [43,44,45,46]. As is well known, tunable unit-cell with a full 360° reflected phase coverage is crucial for realizing a high-performance reflectarray. A small reflected phase tunable range of the unit-cell often leads to deteriorative radiation performance, limiting the function of the whole reflectarray. However, phase tunable ranges of unit-cells in previously reported graphene-based reflectarrays or even metasurfaces [47] are essentially realized by tuning physical parameters of the graphene-based structures. Thus, due to the intrinsic resonant properties and finite losses (such asa damped oscillator) of the graphene-based material, only a narrow band phase tunable range of 300° has been presented [20,42,43,44], which restrict their applications in scenarios where high radiation performances are required. Especially, to the best of our knowledge, the CP graphene-based reflectarrays have also been seldom reported in previous literature, although there is a great demand on them at THz communications. One of the reason is that it is hard to achieve an excellent phase tunability by using graphene-based unit-cells. Therefore, designing a unit-cell with a wide-band tunable phase range of 360° is a meaningful and challenging work for the graphene-based reflectarray design.
In this article, we propose a graphene-based wide-band CP reflectarray operating in the THz regime. The proposed reflectarray consists of a THz CP source and several graphene-based unit-cells. Based on PB phase principle [48], the graphene-based unit-cell is designed to obtain a wide-band (1.4–1.7 THz) tunable phase range of 360°, which overcomes the restriction of intrinsic narrow band resonant in graphene. Therefore, the graphene-based unit-cell exhibits superior bandwidth and phase tunability to its previous counterparts. Based on the proposed graphene-based unit-cell, a focusing metasurface operating in 1.4–1.7 THz bands is demonstrated firstly, which exhibits prominent focusing effect. Then, according to the reversibility of the optical path, we realize a CP reflectarray by placing a wide-band CP THz source at the focal point of the metasurface. Numerical simulation demonstrates that this reflectarray can achieve a stable high gain up to 15 dBic and an axial ratio around 2.1 dB over the 1.4–1.7 THz bands. The good radiation performance of the proposed CP reflectarray, as demonstrated, underlines its suitability for the THz communication applications.

2. PB Principle

To have a clear physical insight of the proposed CP reflectarray, firstly, we have deduced the principle of PB phase, obtaining the necessary phase requirement of the unit cell. As shown in Figure 1, we apply a rectangle to represent a PB unit cell. In Figure 1a, a right-handed CP (RHCP) incident wave normally (along the −z direction) illuminates the surface, with an incident electric field expression
E inc = ( x + j y ) e j k z
and the electric field of reflected wave will be
E ref = ( r x x e j φ x + j r y y e j φ y ) e j k z
where k denotes the wavenumber in free space. rx and ry represent the reflectivity of x-polarized and y-polarized waves, respectively. Similarly, φx and φy are the reflected phases of x-polarized and y-polarized waves, respectively.
As shown in Figure 1b, when the unit cell is anticlockwise rotated with an angle of θ, the relationship between the uv coordinate and the xy coordinate can be represented by
{ x = u cos θ v sin θ y = u sin θ + v cos θ
Thus, in the uvz coordinate, we substitute Equation (3) into Equation (1), and the incident waves can be expressed as
E inc = ( u + j v ) e j k z e j θ
and, corresponding reflected waves are
E ref = ( r u u e j φ u + j r v v e j φ v ) e j k z e j θ
From Figure 1, we can easily obtain that the reflectivity ru and reflected phase φu in the uvz coordinate are equal to the reflectivity rx and reflected phase φx in the xyz coordinate, respectively. In a similar way, the reflectivity rv and reflected phase φv in the uvz coordinate are equal to the reflectivity ry and reflected phase φy in the xyz coordinate, respectively. Therefore, ru = rx, φu = φx, rv = ry, and φv = φy. Then, Equation (5) can be expressed as
E ref = 1 2 [ ( r x x j r y y ) ( e j φ x e j φ y ) e j 2 θ + ( r x x + j r y y ) ( e j φ x e j φ y ) ] e j k z
From Equation (6), if rx = ry, it is found that the reflected waves consist of two components, RHCP and left hand CP (LHCP), respectively.
E ref ( RHCP ) = 1 2 r x ( x j y ) ( e j φ x e j φ y ) e j 2 θ e j k z
E ref ( LHCP ) = 1 2 r x ( x + j y ) ( e j φ x + e j φ y ) e j k z
and when |φx − φy| = π, Equations (7) and (8) change to
E ref ( RHCP ) = 1 2 r x ( x j y ) e j φ x e j k z e j 2 θ
E ref ( LHCP ) = 0
Obviously, there is only an RHCP component inside the reflected wave, and the phase variation is 2θ, equal to two times of the rotation angle. Contrary to the metallic plate, the reflected waves of the PB unit-cell based metasurface only contain the co-polarized components. It is worth noting that the conditions of |φx − φy| ≈ π and rxry must be fulfilled.

3. Graphene Based PB Unit-Cell

Graphene can strongly interact with electromagnetic waves in THz regime through plasmonic resonance [23,24]. However, for practical applications, wave-graphene interactions have to be further improved. In this paper, a graphene-based PB phase unit-cell is proposed, as shown in Figure 2b. The structure of the unit-cell consists of a top layer rectangular graphene patch and a square grounded quartz glass (SiO2) substrate. When we extend these unit-cells periodically along both the x and y directions, a 2-D graphene-based metasurface can be obtained, as shown in Figure 2a. Incident terahertz waves can excite the plasmonic resonances of the graphene patches, and can be totally reflected by the bottom metallic ground. The top layer graphene-patches work as a partially reflecting mirror, and the bottom metallic ground operates as a fully reflecting mirror, respectively. Because of the rectangular shape of the graphene patch, the phases of the reflected waves can be independently manipulated by changing w or l, as shown in Figure 2d. The reason is that the Ex component of the incident wave can only excite the plasmonic resonance in the x direction, and Ey component of the incident wave can only excite the plasmonic resonance in the y direction [49]. Based on this characteristic, we can easily design a unit-cell fulfilling the conditions of |φxφy| ≈ π and rxry.
The modeling method of the graphene-based unit-cell is given in the following section. In the terahertz frequencies, the complex surface conductivity of graphene is determined by intraband transition. It can be approximated by a semi-classical Drude model [50]
σ ( ω ) = 2 e 2 π 2 k B T ln [ 2 cosh ( E f 2 k B T ) ] i ω + i τ 1
where e is the elementary charge, kB is the Boltzmann’s constant, is the reduced Plank’s constant, T is temperature, τ is the relaxation time, ω is the radian frequency, and Ef is the Fermi energy. When Ef is much larger than the thermal energy kB T, the complex conductivity of graphene can be simplified to σ ( ω ) = e 2 E f π 2 i ω + i τ 1 . The electron relaxation time τ is the function of the carrier mobility μ, the Fermi energy Ef, and Fermi velocity vf. It can be expressed as τ = E f μ e v f 2 , which implies that increasing μ will reduce the loss and enhance the efficiency of the device. The carrier mobility μ often has a variation range from ~1000 cm2/Vs to ~230,000 cm2/Vs with varied fabricated technologies [20]. In our simulation, according to the experimental results in Ref. [51], it is reasonable to assume that the Fermi energy Ef = 0.64 eV (corresponding to electron concentration of n = 3 × 1013 cm−2 in Ref. [51]), carrier mobility μ = 10,000 cm2/Vs, temperature T = 300 K and Fermi velocity vf = 106 m/s.
The reflectivity and phases of the proposed unit-cell were full-wave simulated using Ansoft HFSS 2017 software (Ansoft, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The unit-cell depicted in Figure 2b,c is modeled with a graphene patch on the top layer, then it was deposited on a square grounded SiO2 substrate. The SiO2 substrate has a relative permittivity of εr = 3.75, and a loss tangent tanδ = 0.0184. The parameter w and l are the width and length of the graphene patch in the x and y directions, respectively, and p = 15 µm denotes unit-cell side-length which also equal to a periodicity to form the 2-D metasurface. Besides, t = 10 nm and d = 26 µm are the thickness of the metallic ground and quartz glass (SiO2) substrate, respectively. In our simulation, the master and slaver boundary condition was added to the unit-cell to modeling an infinite array. Meanwhile, Floquet port is placed at z = 6d and utilized to interact with the periodic unit-cell structure. In addition, the reflectivity and phases are obtained by the parametric sweep module of HFSS solver. The center frequency is set to 1.52 THz.
Such a PB unit cell can be looked as an anisotropic scatterer, which has a polarization dependent response. In normally incident case, we optimize the geometric parameters of the unit-cell, and choose the geometric parameters w = 13.39 μm, and l = 3.2 μm. Figure 3a displays the reflectivity and reflected phases of the x- and y-polarized waves, respectively. The reflectivity of x- and y-polarized waves are almost equal, with values near 1, indicating high efficiency. A nearly constant 180° reflected phase difference between the x- and y-polarized incident waves can be achieved in a wide frequency band (1.4–1.7 THz), realizing exactly 180° at 1.52 THz, as shown in Figure 3b.
According to the principle of PB phase, the proposed graphene-based unit-cell can realize co-polarized conversion, which can convert the illuminated CP wave into a co-polarized CP wave efficiently. Figure 3c gives the co-polarized and cross-polarized conversion ratios when there is a normally RHCP incident wave, verifying the co-polarized conversion. In 1.4–1.7 THz bands, high-efficiency co-polarized transformation has been achieved. Parameters rRR and rLR indicate the co-polarized conversion ratio and cross-polarized conversion ratio, respectively.

4. Graphene Metasurface for Focusing

After verifying the wide-band high efficiency co-polarized converting capability of the proposed PB unit-cell, we can compensate arbitrary phase in a range of 0°–360° by element rotating.
φ ( x , y ) = 2 π λ 0 ( x 2 + y 2 + f 2 f ) + φ 0
To focus the reflected CP wave of a normally incident plane wave, a phase distribution must be fulfilled, where f represents focal length, λ0 represents wavelength in free space, φ0 represents initial phase at the original point. Following Equation (12), we design a focusing graphene metasurface with 51 × 51 unit-cells at 1.52 THz, and the focal length is set to 190 μm. The phase distribution is illustrated in Figure 4a, and corresponding unit-cell distribution is plotted in Figure 4b. In the numerical simulation, a normally RHCP incident wave is placed along the −z direction, obtaining energy distribution in the xoz plane at 1.4, 1.52, 1.6 and 1.7 THz, respectively, as depicted in Figure 5a–d. From these results, the prominent focusing effect can be observed, verifying our design. Furthermore, as the frequency increases, the focal length increases proportional, in accord with Equation (12). It is worth noting that a full 360° reflected phase range is quite important for generating such focusing metasurface. If narrower phase range is applied, as presented by previous studies [20,42,43], focusing performances will be degraded because of out of phase values in some positions of the metasurface.

5. High Gain CP Graphene-Based Reflectarray

Previously, we have proposed a graphene metasurface which has prominent focusing capability in a wide-band of 1.4–1.7 THz. Then, according to the principle of optical path reversibility [52], we can place a wide-band CP THz source at the focal point of the metasurface. Thus, the incident spherical wave from the THz source can be converted to reflected plane wave with enhanced gain. In our simulation, we choose a THz CP horn antenna as the feeding sourceand optimize its radiation pattern (−10 dB beam width) for effective illumination. Simulated radiation patterns and axial ratios of the proposed feeding source at 1.4, 1.52, 1.6, and 1.7 THz are demonstrated in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively. Obviously, a stable −10 dB RHCP beam-width around 120° can be achieved, as shown in the figures. According to the calculated radiation angle, center feeding distance 190 μm is chosen, in keeping with the focal length f = 190 μm of the proposed metasurface.
Figure 8a–l presents the radiation pattern of the reflectarray at 1.4, 1.52, 1.6 and 1.7 THz, respectively. It is shown that the enhanced gains produced by the proposed reflectarray are 14.32, 15.34, 14.95 and 14.70 dBic, at 1.4, 1.52, 1.6 and 1.7 THz, respectively. Besides, the cross-polarization levels are at least 15 dB lower than the co-polarization levels all across the 1.4–1.7 THz bands, demonstrating good CP properties. It is worth noting that the co-polarization radiation patterns have little asymmetric feature. Due to the center-feeding regime [53,54] of the proposed reflectarray, the CP feeding horn will inevitably interact with the reflected waves, causing distortion of the radiation pattern. Thus, we have to optimize the design parameters to maximally reduce the blockage effect of the feeding structure. Besides, we can alleviate such interaction by off-axial feeding regime. Furthermore, wide-band gain and axial ratio results are displayed in Figure 9, stable gain around 15 dBic and axial ratio around 2.1 dB can be achieved in the whole 1.4–1.7 THz bands, exhibiting both high gain and CP capability, simultaneously.

6. Conclusions

We have systematically investigated the spectral responses of graphene-based PB phase unit-cell and demonstrated a practical implementation of wide-band high gain CP reflectarray based on this configuration in the THz regime. Based on PB phase principle, an arbitrary reflected phase controlling can be realized, extremely extending the phase modulated ability of conventional graphene-based unit-cells that only have a phase controlling range of 300°. Finally, a focusing graphene-based metasurface and a reflectarray were designed, simulated and optimized. Simulation results exhibit excellent performances as theoretical expectations. The proposed reflectarray has a stable gain of 15 dBic and axial ratio of 2 dB over the 1.4–1.7 THz bands, demonstrating high gain and CP characteristics, simultaneously. This reflectarray may have a promising application in future THz communications. Meanwhile, for practical fabrication, we can design the graphene-based unit-cell which is consist of five layers, such as graphene layer, alumina layer, polysilicon layer, quartz glass layer, and ground. The polysilicon can be applied as an electrode. The Fermi energy is related to the conductivity of graphene, and can be dynamically tuned by varying the DC voltage (VDC) between the graphene and the polysilicon. Detailed techniques to fabricate these kinds of graphene reflectarray can be found in Reference [55], supporting the feasibility of our design. In addition, it is worth noting that the general technical procedure formulated herein facilitates further production of such graphene-based devices for various applications.

Author Contributions

L.D. proposed the idea and designed the structure; Y.Z. and J.Z. analyzed the data; and L.D. and C.Z. wrote the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61601040).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Petrov, V.; Komarov, M.; Moltchanov, D.; Jornet, J.M.; Koucheryavy, Y. Interference and SINR in millimeter waveand terahertz communication systems with blocking and directional antennas. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2017, 16, 1791–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Singh, L.; Xie, L.; Chen, M.; Xu, N.; Singh, R.; Zhang, W. Terahertz sensing of highly absorptive water-methanol mixtures with multiple resonances in metamaterials. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 14089–14097. [Google Scholar]
  3. Suen, J.Y.; Fan, K.; Padilla, W.J.; Liu, X. All-dielectric metasurface absorbers for uncooled terahertz imaging. Optica 2017, 4, 601. [Google Scholar]
  4. Murano, K.I.; Watanabe, A.; Kasamatsu, S.; Suzuki, M. Low-profile terahertz radar based on broadband leaky-wave beam steering. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chopra, N.; Yang, K.; Abbasi, Q.H.; Qaraqe, K.A.; Philpott, M.; Alomainy, A. THz time-domain spectroscopy ofhuman skin tissue for in-body nanonetworks. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koenig, S.; Lopezdiaz, D.; Antes, J.; Boes, F.; Henneberger, R.; Leuther, A. Wireless sub-THZ communication system with high data rate. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, W.; Cahill, R.; Encinar, J.A. Design and measurement of reconfigurable millimeter wave reflectarray cells with nematic liquid crystal. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2008, 56, 3112–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Headland, D.; Carrasco, E.; Nirantar, S.; Withayachumnankul, W.; Gutruf, P.; Schwarz, J.; Abbott, D.; Bhaskaran, M.; Sriram, S.; Perruisseau-Carrier, J.; et al. Dielectric resonator reflectarray as high-efficiency nonuniform terahertz metasurface. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alizadeh, P.; Parini, C.G.; Rajab, K.Z. Optically reconfigurable unit cell for Ka-band reflectarray antennas. Electron. Lett. 2017, 53, 1526–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Encinar, J.A.; Datashvili, L.S.; Zornoza, J.A. Dual-polarization dual-coverage reflectarray for space applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2006, 54, 2827–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Florencio, R.; Encinar, J.A.; Boix, R.; Losada, R.V. Reflectarray antennas for dual polarization and broadband telecom satellite applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 1234–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chou, H.T.; Ho, H.K.; Chen, Y.J. Radiation discrepancy analysis for metallic reflectarray antennas with random manufacture distortion at mmW frequencies. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 1885–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, L.; Qu, S.W.; Chen, B.J. Terahertz metasurfaces for absorber or reflectarray applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hasani, H.; Tamagnone, M.; Capdevila, S. Tri-band, polarization-independent reflectarray at terahertz frequencies: Design, fabrication, and measurement. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Han, C.; Rodenbeck, C.; Huang, J. A C/Ka dual frequency dual layer circularly polarized reflectarray antenna with microstrip ring elements. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2004, 52, 2871–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mener, S.; Gillard, R.; Sauleau, R. Dual circularly polarized reflectarray with independent control of polarizations. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 1877–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deng, R.; Mao, Y. A single-layer dual-band circularly polarized reflectarray with high aperture efficiency. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 3317–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abadi, S.M.; Amin, M.H.; Behdad, N. Broadband true-time-delay circularly polarized reflectarray with linearly polarized feed. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2016, 64, 4891–4896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Haraz, O.M. A millimeter-wave circular reflectarray antenna for future 5G cellular networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 19–24 July 2015; pp. 1534–1535. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Z.; Yao, K.; Xia, F.; Shen, S.; Tian, J.; Liu, Y. Graphene plasmonic metasurfaces to steer infrared light. Nano Lett. 2015, 5, 12423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Jablan, M.; Buljan, H. Plasmonics in graphene at infrared frequencies. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Koppens, F.H.; Chang, D.E.; García de Abajo, F.J. Graphene plasmonics: A platform for strong light-matter interactions. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3370–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fei, Z.; Rodin, A.S.; Andreev, G.O.; Bao, W.; McLeod, A.S.; Wagner, M.; Zhang, L.M.; Zhao, Z.; Thiemens, M.; Dominguez, G.; et al. Gate-tuning of graphene plasmons revealed by infrared nano-imaging. Nature 2012, 487, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, J.; Badioli, M.; AlonsogonzÃalez, P.; Thongrattanasiri, S.F. Optical nano-imaging of gate-tunable graphene plasmons. Nature 2012, 487, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, P.Q.; Luxmoore, I.J.; Mikhailov, S.A. Highly tunable hybrid metamaterials employing split-ring resonators strongly coupled to graphene surface plasmons. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, C. Gate-variable optical transitions in graphene. Science 2008, 320, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Youngblood, N.; Anugrah, Y.; Ma, R. Multifunctional graphene optical modulator and photodetector integrated on silicon waveguides. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2741–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Peres, N.M.; Ribeiro, R.M.; Castro, N.A.H. Excitonic effects in the optical conductivity of gated graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 055501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Giovannetti, G.; Khomyakov, P.A.; Brocks, G. Doping graphene with metal contacts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 026803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhang, Y.; Tang, T.T.; Girit, C.Z. Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene. Nature 2009, 459, 820–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Avouris, P.; Freitag, M. Graphene photonics, plasmonics, and optoelectronics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum 2013, 20, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Filter, R.; Farhat, M.; Steglich, M. Tunable graphene antennas for selective enhancement of THz-emission. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 3737–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zak, A.; Andersson, M.A.; Bauer, M.J.; Matukas, J.; Lisauskas, A.; Roskos, H.G.; Stake, J. Antenna-integrated 0.6 THz FET direct detectors based on CVD graphene. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 5834–5838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, Z.; Dong, X.; Bornemann, J. Design of a reconfigurable MIMO system for THz communications based on graphene antennas. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Correas-Serrano, D.J.; Gomez-Diaz, S. Electrically and magnetically biased graphene-based cylindrical waveguides: Analysis and applications as reconfigurable antennas. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dragoman, M.; Muller, A.A.; Dragoman, D.; Coccetti, F.; Plana, R. Terahertz antenna based on graphene. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 104313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tamagnone, M.; Gómez-Díaz1, J.; Mosig, J.; Perruisseau-Carrier, J. Analysis and design of THz antennas on plasmonic resonant graphene sheets. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 9151–9154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Amanatiadis, S.A.; Karamanos, T.D.; Kantartzis, N.V. Radiation efficiency enhancement of graphene THz antennas utilizing metamaterial substrates. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017, 16, 2054–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hosseininejad, S.E.; Alarcón, E.; Komjani, N.; Abadal, S.; Lemme, M.C.; Bolívar, P.H.; Cabellos-Aparicio, A. Study of hybrid and pure plasmonic terahertz antennas based on graphene guided-wave structures. Nano Commun. Netw. 2017, 12, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Correas-Serrano, D.; Gomez-Diaz, J.S. Graphene-Based Antennas for Terahertz Systems: A review. Forum for Electromagnetic Research Methods and Application Technologies. 2017. Available online: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1704/1704.00371.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2018).
  41. Abadal, S.; Llatser, I.; Mestres, A.; Lee, H.; Alarcon, E.; Cabellos-Aparicio, A. Time-domain analysis of graphene-based miniaturized antennas for ultra-short-range impulse radio communications. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2015, 63, 1470–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Carrasco, E.; Perruisseau, C.J. Reflectarray antenna at terahertz using graphene. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2013, 12, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chang, Z.; You, B.; Wu, L.; Tang, M.; Zhang, Y. A reconfigurable graphene reflectarray for generation ofvortex THz waves. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 1537–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y. Generation of Wideband Tunable Orbital Angular Momentum Vortex Waves Using Graphene Metamaterial Reflectarray. IEEE Access 2017, 6, 5341–5347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yu, H.; Yao, Y.; Qu, S. Design of graphene based reflectarray antenna. In Proceedings of the Millimeter Waves and THz Technology Workshop, Caerdydd, UK, 14–15 September 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  46. You, B.; Zhou, L.; Wu, L. Reconfigurable graphene reflectarray with switchable focus. In Proceedings of the IEEE Mtt-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Advanced Materials and Processes for Rf and Thz Applications, Chengdu, China, 20–22 July 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sherrott, M.C.; Pwc, H.; Fountaine, K.T.; Garcia, J.C.; Ponti, S.M.; Brar, V.W.; Sweatlock, L.A.; Atwater, H.A. Experimental demonstration of 230° phase modulation in gate-tunable graphene-gold reconfigurable mid-infrared metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3027–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhang, Y.; Tan, Y.W.; Stormer, H.L.; Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum hall effect and berry’sphase in graphene. Nature 2005, 438, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Deng, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Hong, W.; Peng, B.; Zhu, J.; Li, S. Manipulating of different-polarized reflected waves with graphene-based plasmonic metasurfaces in terahertz regime. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Falkovsky, L.A. Optical properties of graphene. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2008, 115, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Peng, S. Reversibility of diffraction optical path by fresnel theory. J. App. Opt. 2011, 32, 1103–1109. [Google Scholar]
  53. Fan, C.; Choi, W.W.; Yang, W. A Low cross-polarization reflectarray antenna based on SIW slot antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017, 16, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chaharmir, M.R.; Shaker, J.; Cuhaci, M. Novel photonically-controlled reflectarray antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2006, 54, 1134–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Carrasco, E.; Tamagnone, M.; Perruisseau, C.J. Tunable graphene reflective cells for THz reflectarrays and generalized law of reflection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 183–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustration of PB phase unit-cell: (a) PB phase unit-cell in the xy coordinate; (b) PB phase unit-cell in the uv coordinate, which is transformed by an θ anticlockwise rotation of the original xy coordinate. Both coordinates have the same original point.
Figure 1. Illustration of PB phase unit-cell: (a) PB phase unit-cell in the xy coordinate; (b) PB phase unit-cell in the uv coordinate, which is transformed by an θ anticlockwise rotation of the original xy coordinate. Both coordinates have the same original point.
Materials 11 00956 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of the proposed graphene-based reflectarray, which is composed of a focusing graphene metasurface and a CP THz source. (b) The PB unit-cell, which is composed of a rectangular graphene patch and a grounded quartz glass (SiO2) substrate. The side lengths of the rectangle are w and l, in x and y direction, respectively. p represents the side length of the unit-cell, which can be extended in both x and y direction, forming a 2-D metasurface. (c) Side view of the proposed PB unit-cell. Geometric parameters t and d denote the thickness of the ground plate and substrate, respectively. (d) Simulated reflected phases under the normal illumination of the x-and y-polarized plane waves. Fixing l = 3.2 µm, the variation range of parameter w is from 2 µm to 13 µm, at 1.52 THz.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of the proposed graphene-based reflectarray, which is composed of a focusing graphene metasurface and a CP THz source. (b) The PB unit-cell, which is composed of a rectangular graphene patch and a grounded quartz glass (SiO2) substrate. The side lengths of the rectangle are w and l, in x and y direction, respectively. p represents the side length of the unit-cell, which can be extended in both x and y direction, forming a 2-D metasurface. (c) Side view of the proposed PB unit-cell. Geometric parameters t and d denote the thickness of the ground plate and substrate, respectively. (d) Simulated reflected phases under the normal illumination of the x-and y-polarized plane waves. Fixing l = 3.2 µm, the variation range of parameter w is from 2 µm to 13 µm, at 1.52 THz.
Materials 11 00956 g002
Figure 3. (a) Simulated reflection performance of the PB unit-cell under the normal illumination of x-and y-polarized plane waves. The red and blue curves represent the amplitude and phase of the reflected wave, respectively. Optimizing geometric parameters w = 13.39 µm and l = 3.2 µm are chosen in the simulation. (b) Simulated phase differences of the x-and y-polarized reflected waves. Yellow area in the figure demonstrates the frequency range of a nearly 180° phase difference. (c) Simulated co-polarized and cross-polarized conversion ratios under the normal RHCP incident plane wave. The blue and red curves represent the co-polarized conversion ratio and cross-polarized conversion ratio, respectively.
Figure 3. (a) Simulated reflection performance of the PB unit-cell under the normal illumination of x-and y-polarized plane waves. The red and blue curves represent the amplitude and phase of the reflected wave, respectively. Optimizing geometric parameters w = 13.39 µm and l = 3.2 µm are chosen in the simulation. (b) Simulated phase differences of the x-and y-polarized reflected waves. Yellow area in the figure demonstrates the frequency range of a nearly 180° phase difference. (c) Simulated co-polarized and cross-polarized conversion ratios under the normal RHCP incident plane wave. The blue and red curves represent the co-polarized conversion ratio and cross-polarized conversion ratio, respectively.
Materials 11 00956 g003
Figure 4. (a) The reflected phase distribution of the proposed focusing graphene metasurface with an area 714 µm × 714 µm. (b) The unit-cells distribution of the proposed focusing graphene metasurface with 51 × 51 unit-cells. Each unit-cell rotates a corresponding phase angle θ = φ/2.
Figure 4. (a) The reflected phase distribution of the proposed focusing graphene metasurface with an area 714 µm × 714 µm. (b) The unit-cells distribution of the proposed focusing graphene metasurface with 51 × 51 unit-cells. Each unit-cell rotates a corresponding phase angle θ = φ/2.
Materials 11 00956 g004
Figure 5. (a) Normalized energy distribution in xoz plane at 1.4 THz, the center z position of the focal point is less than 190 µm. (b) Normalized energy distribution in xoz plane at 1.52 THz, the center z position of the focal point is almost 190 µm. (c) Normalized energy distribution in xoz plane at 1.6 THz, the center z position of the focal point is a little larger than 190 µm. (d) Normalized energy distribution in xoz plane at 1.7 THz, the center z position of the focal point is quite larger than 190 µm.
Figure 5. (a) Normalized energy distribution in xoz plane at 1.4 THz, the center z position of the focal point is less than 190 µm. (b) Normalized energy distribution in xoz plane at 1.52 THz, the center z position of the focal point is almost 190 µm. (c) Normalized energy distribution in xoz plane at 1.6 THz, the center z position of the focal point is a little larger than 190 µm. (d) Normalized energy distribution in xoz plane at 1.7 THz, the center z position of the focal point is quite larger than 190 µm.
Materials 11 00956 g005
Figure 6. (a) Simulated 2-D radiation pattern of the feeding horn antenna at 1.4 THz. (b) The simulated 2-D radiation pattern of the feeding horn antenna at 1.52 THz. (c) The simulated 2-D radiation pattern of the feeding horn antenna at 1.6 THz. (d) The simulated 2-D radiation pattern of the feeding horn antenna at 1.7 THz. In all panels the gain of RHCP and LHCP components in φ = 0° plane and φ = 90° plane are demonstrated, respectively.
Figure 6. (a) Simulated 2-D radiation pattern of the feeding horn antenna at 1.4 THz. (b) The simulated 2-D radiation pattern of the feeding horn antenna at 1.52 THz. (c) The simulated 2-D radiation pattern of the feeding horn antenna at 1.6 THz. (d) The simulated 2-D radiation pattern of the feeding horn antenna at 1.7 THz. In all panels the gain of RHCP and LHCP components in φ = 0° plane and φ = 90° plane are demonstrated, respectively.
Materials 11 00956 g006
Figure 7. (a) Simulated axial ratio of the feeding horn antenna at 1.4 THz. (b) Simulated axial ratio of the feeding horn antenna at 1.52 THz. (c) Simulated axial ratio of the feeding horn antenna at 1.6 THz. (d) Simulated axial ratio of the feeding horn antenna at 1.7 THz. In all panels the axial ratios in φ = 0° plane and φ = 90° plane are demonstrated, respectively.
Figure 7. (a) Simulated axial ratio of the feeding horn antenna at 1.4 THz. (b) Simulated axial ratio of the feeding horn antenna at 1.52 THz. (c) Simulated axial ratio of the feeding horn antenna at 1.6 THz. (d) Simulated axial ratio of the feeding horn antenna at 1.7 THz. In all panels the axial ratios in φ = 0° plane and φ = 90° plane are demonstrated, respectively.
Materials 11 00956 g007
Figure 8. (a) 3-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.4 THz. (b) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.4 THz in ϕ = 0° plane. (c) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.4 THz in ϕ = 90° plane. (d) 3-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.52 THz. (e) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.52 THz in ϕ = 0° plane. (f) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.52 THz in ϕ = 90° plane. (g) 3-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.6 THz. (h) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.6 THz in ϕ = 0° plane. (i) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.6 THz in ϕ = 90° plane. (j) 3-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.7 THz. (k) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.7 THz in ϕ = 0° plane. (l) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.7 THz in ϕ = 90° plane.
Figure 8. (a) 3-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.4 THz. (b) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.4 THz in ϕ = 0° plane. (c) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.4 THz in ϕ = 90° plane. (d) 3-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.52 THz. (e) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.52 THz in ϕ = 0° plane. (f) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.52 THz in ϕ = 90° plane. (g) 3-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.6 THz. (h) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.6 THz in ϕ = 0° plane. (i) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.6 THz in ϕ = 90° plane. (j) 3-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.7 THz. (k) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.7 THz in ϕ = 0° plane. (l) 2-D radiation pattern of the proposed reflectarray at 1.7 THz in ϕ = 90° plane.
Materials 11 00956 g008
Figure 9. Simulated RHCP gain and axial ratio of the proposed reflectarray. The red and the blue curves represent the RHCP gain and axial ratio, respectively.
Figure 9. Simulated RHCP gain and axial ratio of the proposed reflectarray. The red and the blue curves represent the RHCP gain and axial ratio, respectively.
Materials 11 00956 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, C. Wide-Band Circularly Polarized ReflectarrayUsing Graphene-Based Pancharatnam-Berry Phase Unit-Cells for Terahertz Communication. Materials 2018, 11, 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060956

AMA Style

Deng L, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Zhang C. Wide-Band Circularly Polarized ReflectarrayUsing Graphene-Based Pancharatnam-Berry Phase Unit-Cells for Terahertz Communication. Materials. 2018; 11(6):956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060956

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deng, Li, Yuanyuan Zhang, Jianfeng Zhu, and Chen Zhang. 2018. "Wide-Band Circularly Polarized ReflectarrayUsing Graphene-Based Pancharatnam-Berry Phase Unit-Cells for Terahertz Communication" Materials 11, no. 6: 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060956

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop