Next Article in Journal
Fe3O4–Silicone Mixture as Flexible Actuator
Previous Article in Journal
Experimentally Achievable Accuracy Using a Digital Image Correlation Technique in measuring Small-Magnitude (<0.1%) Homogeneous Strain Fields
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Comparative Study of Oxygen Plasma Treated Poly(Lactic–Co–Glycolic) (PLGA) Membranes and Supported Nanostructured Oxides for Guided Bone Regeneration Processes

by
Daniel Torres-Lagares
1,*,
Lizett Castellanos-Cosano
1,
Maria-Angeles Serrera-Figallo
1,
Carmen López-Santos
2,
Angel Barranco
2,
Agustín Rodríguez-González-Elipe
2 and
Jose-Luis Gutierrez-Perez
1
1
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, Avicena Street, 41009 Seville, Spain
2
Institute of Materials Science of Seville (CSIC-University of Seville), Américo Vespucio Street nº 49, 41092 Seville, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(5), 752; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050752
Submission received: 27 March 2018 / Revised: 26 April 2018 / Accepted: 3 May 2018 / Published: 8 May 2018

Abstract

:
(1) Background: The use of physical barriers to prevent the invasion of gingival and connective tissue cells into bone cavities during the healing process is called guided bone regeneration. The objective of this in-vitro study was to compare the growth of human osteoblasts on Poly(Lactic–co–Glycolic) (PLGA) membranes modified with oxygen plasma and Hydroxyapatite (HA), silicon dioxide (SiO2), and titanium dioxide (TiO2) composite nanoparticles, respectively. (2) Methods: All the membranes received a common treatment with oxygen plasma and were subsequently treated with HA nanostructured coatings (n = 10), SiO2 (n = 10) and TiO2 (n = 10), respectively and a PLGA control membrane (n = 10). The assays were performed using the human osteoblast line MG-63 acquired from the Center for Scientific Instrumentation (CIC) from the University of Granada. The cell adhesion and the viability of the osteoblasts were analyzed by means of light-field microphotographs of each condition with the inverted microscope Axio Observer A1 (Carl Zeiss). For the determination of the mitochondrial energy balance, the MitoProbe™ JC-1 Assay Kit was employed. For the determination of cell growth and the morphology of adherent osteoblasts, two techniques were employed: staining with phalloidin-TRITC and staining with DAPI. (3) Results: The modified membranes that show osteoblasts with a morphology more similar to the control osteoblasts follow the order: PLGA/PO2/HA > PLGA/PO2/SiO2 > PLGA/PO2/TiO2 > PLGA (p < 0.05). When analysing the cell viability, a higher percentage of viable cells bound to the membranes was observed as follows: PLGA/PO2/SiO2 > PLGA/PO2/HA > PLGA/PO2/TiO2 > PLGA (p < 0.05), with a better energy balance of the cells adhered to the membranes PLGA/PO2/HA and PLGA/PO2/SiO2. (4) Conclusion: The membrane in which osteoblasts show characteristics more similar to the control osteoblasts is the PLGA/PO2/HA, followed by the PLGA/PO2/SiO2.

1. Introduction

Tissue engineering has been used as a strategy during the 21st century for the development of guided bone regeneration scaffolds and composites. In this manner, compared with other traditional methods, bone tissue engineering offers a new and interesting approach to bone repair. Guided bone regeneration consists of the placement of physical barriers that prevent the invasion of the connective or gingival tissue during the process of bone healing [1]. Among the physical barriers most commonly used in these biological processes is the Poly(Lactic–co–Glycolic) (PLGA) copolymer, due to previously described characteristics such as good bone adhesion, good vascularity, increased growth of osteoblastic cells on the surface of in vitro cultures, good biodegradability by hydrolysis, and subsequent elimination in the Krebs cycle in the form of CO2 and H2O [2]. In a previous work of our team, information about the characteristics and functions of scaffolds with biomedical applications was expanded, with special interest in scaffold construction using poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) polymers [3].
Numerous published studies have focused on the in vitro and in vivo effect of modified PLGA by means of processes that allow its roughness to increase [4,5,6,7]. As it is well known, the internal cellular organization and its orientation are controlled by focal adhesions that mediate the regulating effects of the adhesion of the extracellular matrix. The distribution of the actin-myosin fibers depending on the properties of the surface is based on integrins that serve as mechanosensors, converting the mechanical signals of the medium into biological signals [4]. This scientific and biological evidence has allowed us to consider that the induction of the cellular activity of the osteoblasts can be further improved by modifying not only the roughness of the biomaterial surface, but also by the deposition of nanostructured coatings [5].
The objective of this in vitro study was to study which of the PLGA membranes coated with nanostructured hydroxyapatite (HA), silicon dioxide (SiO2), and Titanium Oxide (TiO2) presented a more optimal osteoblastic growth, in comparison with a control PLGA membrane.

2. Materials and Methods

For the experimental design of this in vitro study, four groups of scaffolds were analysed: PLGA control, PLGA-HA, PLGA-SiO2, and PLGA-TiO2, using the MG-63 human osteoblast line acquired at the Center of Scientific Instrumentation (CIC) at the University of Granada. This line of MG-63 shows a faster growth than the primary bone-forming lines but retains many of their characteristics, which makes it a good model in vitro. Firstly, a control of mycoplasma contamination was performed by PCR to verify that the cells were free of contamination. A method of detection by PCR (polymerase chain reaction) was used. The amplification of a band of approximately 500 bp was performed according to eight species of mycoplasma (M. hyorhinis, M. arginini, M. pneumoniae, M. fermentans, M. orale, M. pirum, Acholeplasma laidlawii, and Spiroplasma mirum) using a single pair of oligonucleotides corresponding to the 16S RNA. PCR was performed by taking an aliquot of the conditioned medium from the cells in culture after at least 48 h of culture [4,8,9]. MG-63 cells were cultured on control and experimental membranes.
Forty 50 µm thick resorbable inert PLGA scaffolds based on poly(lactic–co–glycolic) acid were fabricated using polycondensation (Institute of Materials Science, Seville, Spain). For the preparation of the membranes, 10 mL of a solution of PLGA (PLGA pellets with a copolymer ratio of 75:25 (lactic/glycolic acid) from Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) in 1.5% dichloromethane was prepared by evaporation of the solvent on a Teflon plate for 48 h in air at room temperature, obtaining a film of a suitable consistency [4].
In the present research, the membranes’ surfaces of groups were exposed to pure oxygen plasma in a low pressure RF parallel plate reactor working at 13.56 MHz and 10 W for 1 min. The distance between the substrate and grid was 10 cm. This technique generates an etching effect, improving the surface roughness and favouring the adhesion of oxide layers to the PLGA substrates [10]. The treatment of PLGA substrates with oxygen plasma took place at close to ambient temperatures (RT: 23.0 ± 1.0 °C). It is important to stress that similarly to other plasma treatments reported in the bibliography, this plasma surface oxidation process did not affect the membrane structural integrity [10].
One group of membranes was coated with bioactive layers of SiO2 and another one with TiO2. The synthesis of the nanostructured oxide films was carried out at room temperature (RT: 23.0 ± 1.0 °C) by using hexametildisiloxane (HDMSO) or titanium tetrakis-isopropoxide (TTIP) as precursors. Total pressure during deposition was 4 × 10−3 Torr. Precursors were placed in a stainless steel receptacle through which oxygen was bubbled while heating at 305 K. The system consisted of an external microwave plasma source (SLAN, Plasma Consult, GMbh, Wuppertal, Germany) separated from the reactor chamber by a grounded grid to avoid the microwave heating of the PLGA substrates. Distance from the substrate and grid was 10 cm. The system was operated at 400 W with pure O2 as plasma gas [11,12,13,14].
Subsequently, the other membranes were coated with bioactive layers of HA by magnetron sputtering using a radiofrequency power of 50 W under an argon atmosphere at a pressure of 3 × 10−3 mbar [4,15]. Before deposition, the chamber was maintained at a base pressure of 1 × 10−6 mbar. The sputtering deposition was carried out using a copper coating that was 3 mm thick and 46 mm diameter white calcium phosphate. (HA) target (hydroxyapatite) was 4 mm thick, 46 mm in diameter, and 99.9% purity (Kurt J. Lesker Company, Jefferson Hills, PA, USA). The target sample distance was 10 cm and the deposition time was 40 min, obtaining a thickness of the coating of HA on PLGA of around 15 nm [4].
The membranes tended to double with temperature, so in order to avoid this phenomenon during the cultivation, a methodology was designed before carrying out the tests. Two dental adhesives were tested and their toxicity was analysed (Algasiv and Novafix) because there are contradictory studies on their biocompatibility in the literature [9]. A culture of the MG-63 cells was carried out on control wells with Algasiv and Novafix and the morphology of the adherent cells was visualized at 30 h. It was observed that Algasiv produced a morphological change of the cells, rounding them. However, Novafix adhesive did not produce morphological changes, so was selected. In addition, we also used a biocompatible plastic cylinder to press the membranes’ edges. In this combined manner, it was found that the membranes remained smooth and did not ripple during the in vitro study. Once the methodology of the culture was fine-tuned, the assays were developed.
Test 1: For the determination of cell adhesion and osteoblast viability, osteoblasts were cultured on the PLGA experimental (HA, SiO2, TiO2) and PLGA control membranes, in triplicate, plating 120,000 cells. At 24 h, the cultures were analysed by the microphotography of osteoblasts [16,17,18]. Previously, the cells had been fixed with 70% ethanol for 5 min, as it was not possible to observe them without prior fixation. Subsequently, the cells were stained with phalloidin-TRITC (Sigma Aldrich Quimica SL, Madrid, Spain) that marked F-actin fibers to observe a greater increase in cell morphology and prolongations. The cells adhered to the different surfaces were observed at 40× with the Axio Observer A1 inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss Iberia, S.L., Madrid, Spain). Analysis of the number of total cells adhered to the membranes and the percentage of viable cells by means of automatic cell counting (Cell Countess, Invitrogen Fisher Scientific–Spain, Madrid, Spain) by exclusion of the vital stain with trypan blue was performed [4].
Test 2: For the determination of the mitochondrial energy balance, the MitoProbe™ JC-1 Assay Kit (Fisher Scientific–Spain, Madrid, Spain) was employed. Osteoblasts were cultured on the PLGA experimental (HA, SiO2, TiO2) and PLGA control membranes, in triplicate, plating 120,000 cells. At 24 h, the cultures were analysed. JC-1 is a membrane permeable dye widely used for determining mitochondrial membrane potential in flow cytometry and fluorescent microscopy [19]. When mitochondria show good functioning, the probe accumulates in the mitochondria and forms aggregates, which are emitted as a red colour (~590 nm). When the mitochondrial membrane potential decreases during cellular damage phenomena, the emission of the fluorescence turns green (~529 nm), decreasing the red/green ratio, because of the passage to the monomeric form of the probe. The cells were observed at 20× with the Axio Observer A1 inverted microscope after a 30 min incubation (Carl Zeiss). Due to the structure of the SiO2 and TiO2 membranes, it was difficult to obtain conclusive results on the green fluorescence, since they had enough auto fluorescence at this wavelength. Therefore, the ratio could not be calculated with this approach. This is the reason why a quantification by flow cytometry was performed. The red and green fluorescence of the cells that adhered to the different membranes during 24 h were quantified by means of flow cytometry and stained with the JC-1 probe for 15 min, measuring the mitochondrial potential [4].
Test 3: For the determination of cell growth and the morphology of adherent osteoblasts, one staining process was employed. Osteoblasts were cultured on the PLGA experimental (HA, SiO2, TiO2) and PLGA control membranes, in triplicate, plating 120,000 cells. At 24 h, the cultures were analysed. This staining consisted of phalloidin-TRITC 50 μg/mL (red)—a fluorescent phallotoxin that can be used to identify filamentous actin (F-actin) [20]—along with the use of DAPI (40,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) 30 μg/mL (blue)—a nuclear and chromosome counterstain emitting blue fluorescence upon binding to AT regions of DNA cells attached to the different membranes for 24 h [21]. Cells were fixed with 70% alcohol. Both techniques were visualised at 20× with the fluorescence microscope Axio Observer A1 (Carl Zeiss). Measurement of the size of the cells and comparison between the different membranes by quantification with ImageJ was performed. The measurement of the area of cells stained with phalloidin-TRITC was performed, measuring five representative cells from three different samples of each membrane, using the software ImageJ 1.48p (National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland, MD, USA) [4].

3. Results

3.1. Test 1

First, cell adhesion and osteoblast viability were determined. Osteoblasts attached to the PLGA membrane present a smaller size with a lower amount of adhered cells and fewer prolongations and filopodia. The osteoblasts bound to the PLGA-HA are larger and more similar to the control osteoblasts, with a large number of cells, extensions, and filopodia. The osteoblasts that are attached to the SiO2 are a little smaller and have many extensions and filopodia, although they are a little more fusiform. On TiO2, there is a high density of osteoblasts, but they are smaller and have fewer extensions than the osteoblasts adhered to PLGA-HA and SiO2. The osteoblasts that show a morphology more similar to that of the control are classified in the following order: PLGA-HA > SiO2 > TiO2 > PLGA (Figure 1). The results of the validated count observed in the microphotographs showed fewer cells adhered to the PLGA membrane. The viability was more compromised in this membrane, in addition to the one modified with TiO2. The percentage of viable cells bound to the membranes follows the following order: PLGA-SiO2 > PLGA-HA > PLGA-TiO2 > PLGA (Figure 2).

3.2. Test 2

The results obtained after the determination of the mitochondrial energy balance, labelled with JC-1, are observed in Figure 3. A greater red/green ratio was observed for the osteoblasts adhered to the membranes PLGA-HA (2.57) and PLGA-SiO2 (2.38), than for PLGA (1.69) and PLGA-TiO2 (1.49), which indicates a better energy balance of the cells adhered to the membranes of PLGA-HA and SiO2 (Table 1).

3.3. Test 3

The data observed in the determination of cell growth, and morphology of the adhered osteoblasts by visualizing the cultures with Phalloidin-TRITC (Sigma) and DAPI (Sigma), reinforce the conclusions indicated in test 1 regarding cellular morphology. The membrane where the cells show a greater area is in PLGA-HA (290 μm2), followed by TiO2 (320 μm2), PLGA (290 μm2), and finally SiO2 (260 μm2), although the differences did not reach significance between the membranes. The PLGA-HA membrane also has the maximum and minimum greater area between the measurements made on the membranes. The circularity of the cells in the membranes is similar to that of the control membrane, except for TiO2, in which the cells are more damaged (Figure 4). Additionally, a measurement was made of the size of the nuclei, which is also indicative of cell damage phenomena, such as death by apoptosis. The data obtained when measuring the area of the nuclei did not show a remarkable alteration (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Synthetic biodegradable polyesters such as polyglycolic (PGA), polylactic (PLA), and their derivatives, for example, co-glycolic polylactic copolymer (PLGA), are being widely used in bone regeneration [22]. Oxygen plasma increases the rough surface of the membrane and its ability to stimulate bone regeneration (evaluated as the combination of bone neoformation, mineralization, resorption and presence of osteoclasts, and osteosynthesis activity) [23]. Previous studies in vitro and in vivo have compared the use of previously modified membranes with oxygen plasma and subsequently coated with oxide plasma films, finding that the functionalization of PLGA membranes with oxygen plasma improves the results in guided bone regeneration [4,5,6,7].
Within our team, we have carried out some previous studies that have been interested in these areas. The objective of the present article is the direct comparative study of a greater number of in vitro layers in order to provide data to other researchers if they wish to make progress in these layers. Our team has advanced to study in vivo in some of these configurations, which does not detract from the present study [4,5].
Although PLGA has been shown to have a good biocompatibility, PLGA polymers have been associated with hydrophobicity problems. This compromises its mechanical resistance and facilitates the release of acid waste by degradation, decreasing the pH and therefore favouring bacterial proliferation and the inflammatory response [24]. Inorganic materials such as tricalcium phosphate (TCP) or bioactive crystals have previously been used to modify the surface of the membranes and try to mitigate such disadvantages [22]. In this in vitro study, the treatment with oxygen plasma and the deposition of nanostructured silicon dioxide (SiO2), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and hydroxyapatite (HA) on membrane surfaces previously modified with oxygen plasma was evaluated.
In the present in vitro study, the modified membrane that showed the osteoblasts with a morphology more similar to the osteoblast control was the PLGA/PO2/HA membrane (p < 0.05). This result may be due to the fact that the HA used in this study is a synthetic material of the same composition as HA present in the human organism Ca5(PO4)3 (OH), with a great capacity to mimic the structure and composition of natural bone [25]. The synthetic HA (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) as a material for guided bone regeneration has a long history of use and its results are excellent [26]. Almost all materials or scaffolds used in guided bone regeneration base their composition on HA, since it is the main component of the mineralized connective tissue [27]. Torres-Lagares et al. [4] found in an in vitro and in vivo study that the incorporation of nanometric layers of HA in membranes of PLGA previously modified with oxygen plasma promotes greater osteosynthetic activity, new bone formation, and mineralization than the PLGA control group. As we have previously pointed out, these publications complement some of the configurations studied in this article with in vivo data, which does not detract from a comparative and direct study of different configurations that can be followed by other researchers.
In the present in vitro study, the membrane that showed the best cellular viability was that of PLGA/PO2/SiO2 (p < 0.05). It is interesting to note that no significant difference in cell size was found, although it was found in the number of cells that grew. This could indicate that the membranes are all suitable for cell growth, but that some allow a greater division of them to reach larger populations. This result may be due to the fact that the addition of silicon to alkaline phosphates can increase enzymatic activity and protein production in osteoblasts [28,29], producing a stimulating effect on cellular activity: proliferation, differentiation, and osteoblastic mineralization [30,31]. The membranes of PLGA/PO2/SiO2 and PLGA/PO2/HA presented a better energy balance of the cells adhered to the membranes.
In the present study, the PLGA/PO2/TiO2 membrane did not show better results than those membranes coated with HA and SiO2. These results coincide with those of a previous study conducted by Castillo-Dali et al. [5], in which membranes coated by PECVD with SiO2 and TiO2 that had been previously modified, either with or without oxygen plasma, were studied in vivo. The results found that incorporating layers of silicon dioxide into the PLGA membranes pretreated with oxygen plasma resulted in improved bone neoformation compared to the addition of TiO2 films.
This work only contributed the in vivo data of the experimentation of the experimental membrane, which is the reason why the data contributed in the present article complement the previously published data.
In relation to titanium dioxide, its main qualities are based on the ability of bone stimulation by reaction: they have an isoelectric point between 3.5 and 6.7 and low solubility [32]. This means that the surface is negatively charged at a physiological pH, which results in being able to react with biomolecules. The dielectric constant of TiO2 is comparable to that of water and, therefore, the molecularly charged interactions are similar to those of water [33]. The proteins that bind to TiO2 are formed by peptides and, in turn, by amino acids. These proteins act as specific ligands that genetically excite chemotaxis, proliferation, growth, and cell differentiation [34]. On the other hand, the adsorption of proteins in metals determines their good biocompatibility [35].
Related to the porosity of the membranes used, in a previous work [10], we reported that there is not evident weight loss of the PLGA sample after the oxygen plasma. Moreover, an in-depth GCIB-XPS study has proved that the oxygen plasma effect is able to reach only a few hundred nanometers, providing roughness enhancement and the generation of new functional groups. Plasma treatment changed the surface roughness from a value of root-mean square roughness (RMS) 0.34 nm for the control PLGA to 327 nm after the PO2 treatment. [10]
In general, the deposition techniques used do not alter the bulk properties of a polymer substrate and only alter their external surface. In detail, the SiO2 and HA thin film deposition processes do not induce changes in the surface roughness, presenting RMS values of 0.40 nm and 1.9 nm, respectively. Besides, the deposition of an SiO2 nanostructured coating on the PLGA membrane does not alter the composition and other characteristics of the organic membrane, as proved by previous FT-IR analyses [36]. No significant spectral changes were evidenced when comparing the PLGA membrane (50 μm) and the SiO2 films (15 nm), taking into the typical thickness proved by ATR analysis (tens of microns) [36].
The bioactivity, degradation behaviour, and osteoconductivity/osteoinductivity of calcium phosphate ceramics generally depend on the calcium/phosphate ratio, crystallinity, and phase composition [37]. The synthetic HA (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) shows good stability in the body, whereas tricalcium phosphates (α-TCP, β-TCP, Ca3(PO4)2) are more soluble. BCP (a mixture of HA and β-TCP) has intermediate properties depending on the weight ratio of stable/degradable phases. Therefore, the dissolution rate decreases in the following order: α-TCP > β-TCP > BCP > HA [37]. Due to their nature, Ca3(PO4)2 ceramics also exhibit high biocompatibility and the ability to bind with bone tissue under certain conditions; however, given their fragility, their clinical applications have been limited to non-carrier or low-load parts of the skeleton [38]. In fact, it is thought that nanoparticles of hydroxyapatite (nHA) are one of the most promising bone graft materials due to their ability to mimic the structure and composition of natural bone [25]. The HA used in this study is a synthetic material of the same composition as the HA present in the human organism Ca5(PO4)3 (OH). Synthetic HA as a material for GBR has a long history of use, and its results are excellent [26]. Almost all materials or scaffolds used in GBR base their composition on HA, the main component of mineralised connective tissue [27].

5. Conclusions

In this in vitro study, the membrane in which osteoblasts show characteristics of better cellular growth is PLGA-PO2-SiO2, followed by PLGA-PO2-HA. These in vitro data can be used by other researchers to decide upon which configuration to use in new experiences. Only some of these membranes need in vivo studies to complete our knowledge about them.

Author Contributions

D.T.-L., A.B., A.R.-G.-E., and J.-L.G.-P. conceived and designed the experiments; D.T.-L., M.-A.S.-F., A.B., and C.L.-S. performed the experiments; D.T.-L., M.-A.S.-F., and L.C.-C analyzed the data; D.T.-L., A.B., L.C.-C., and M.-A.S.-F. wrote the paper.

Funding

This study has been subsidised by the Consejería de Salud of the Junta de Andalucia through project PI-0047-2013: ‘Innovation in Nanomedicine: Guided Bone Regeneration with Nanofunctionalised Resorbable Membranes (Nanorog)’. The authors also thank the AEI (EU FEDER program Project MAT2016- 79866-R).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hild, N.; Schneider, O.D.; Mohn, D.; Luechinger, N.A.; Koehler, F.M.; Hofmann, S.; Vetsch, J.R.; Thimm, B.W.; Müller, R.; Stark, W.J. Two-layer membranes of calcium phosphate/collagen/PLGA nanofibres: In vitro biomineralisation and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, D.X.; He, Y.; Bi, L.; Qu, Z.H.; Zou, J.W.; Pan, Z.; Fan, J.J.; Chen, L.; Dong, X.; Liu, X.N.; et al. Enhancing the bioactivity of Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffold with a nano-hydroxyapatite coating for the treatment of segmental bone defect in a rabbit model. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8, 1855–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Castillo-Dalí, G.; Velázquez-Cayón, R.; Serrera-Figallo, M.A.; Rodríguez-González-Elipe, A.; Gutierrez-Pérez, J.L.; Torres-Lagares, D. Importance of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) in scaffolds for guided bone regeneration: A focused review. J. Oral Implantol. 2015, 41, e152–e157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Torres-Lagares, D.; Castellanos-Cosano, L.; Serrera-Figallo, M.Á.; García-García, F.J.; López-Santos, C.; Barranco, A.; Gonzalez-Elipe, A.R.; Rivera-Jiménez, C.; Gutiérrez-Pérez, J.L. In vitro and in vivo study of poly(lactic–co–glycolic) (plga) membranes treated with oxygen plasma and coated with nanostructured hydroxyapatite ultrathin films for guided bone regeneration processes. Polymers 2017, 9, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Castillo-Dalí, G.; Castillo-Oyagüe, R.; Terriza, A.; Saffar, J.L.; Batista, A.; Barranco, A.; Cabezas-Talavero, J.; Lynch, C.D.; Barouk, B.; Llorens, A.; et al. In vivo comparative model of oxygen plasma and nanocomposite particles on PLGA membranes for guided bone regeneration processes to be applied in pre-prosthetic surgery: a pilot study. J. Dent. 2014, 42, 1446–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Castillo-Dalí, G.; Castillo-Oyagüe, R.; Batista-Cruzado, A.; López-Santos, C.; Rodríguez-González-Elipe, A.; Saffar, J.L.; Lynch, C.D.; Gutiérrez-Pérez, J.L.; Torres-Lagares, D. Reliability of new poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) membranes treated with oxygen plasma plus silicon dioxide layers for pre-prosthetic guided bone regeneration processes. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2017, 22, e242–e250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Castillo-Dalí, G.; Castillo-Oyagüe, R.; Terriza, A.; Saffar, J.L.; Batista-Cruzado, A.; Lynch, C.D.; Sloan, A.J.; Gutiérrez-Pérez, J.L.; Torres-Lagares, D. Pre-prosthetic use of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) membranes treated with oxygen plasma and TiO2 nanocomposite particles for guided bone regeneration processes. J. Dent. 2016, 47, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wong-Lee, J.G.; Lovett, M. Rapid and sensitive PCR method for identification of Mycoplasma species in tissue culture. In Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications; Persing, D.H., Smith, T.F., Tenover, F.C., White, T.J., Eds.; American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. 257–260. [Google Scholar]
  9. Paz-Pumpido, F. Biocompatibilidad de los adhesivos dentinarios. Av. Odontoestomatol. 2005, 21, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lopez Santos, C.; Terriza, A.; Portoles, J.; Yubero, F.; Gonzalez-Elipe, A.R. Physiological Degradation Mechanisms of PLGA Membrane Films under Oxygen Plasma Treatment. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 20446–20452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jacobs, T.; Declercq, H.; De Geyter, N.; Cornelissen, R.; Dubruel, P.; Leys, C.; Beaurain, A.; Payen, E.; Morent, R. Plasma surface modification of polylactic acid to promote interaction with fibroblasts. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2013, 24, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Borrás, A.; Barranco, A.; González-Elipe, A.R. Design and control of porosity in oxide thin films grown by PECVD. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 5220–5226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sánchez-Valencia, J.R.; Borrás, A.; Barranco, A.; Rico, V.J.; Espinós, J.P.; González-Elipe, A.R. Preillumination of TiO2 and Ta2O5 photoactive thin films as a tool to tailor the synthesis of composite materials. Langmuir 2008, 24, 9460–9469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Borrás, A.; Yanguas-Gil, A.; Barranco, A.; Cotrino, J.; González-Elipe, A.R. Relationship between scaling behavior and porosity of plasma-deposited TiO2 thin films. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 235303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nieh, T.G.; Jankowski, A.F.; Koike, J. Processing and characterization of hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium produced by magnetron sputtering. J. Mater. Res. 2001, 16, 3238–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ruiz-Gaspa, S.; Nogues, X.; Enjuanes, A.; Monllau, J.C.; Blanch, J.; Carreras, R.; Mellibovsky, L.; Grinberg, D.; Balcells, S.; Díez-Perez, A.; et al. Simvastatin and atorvastatin enhance gene expression of collagen type 1 and osteocalcin in primary human osteoblasts and mg-63 cultures. J. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 101, 1430–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Staehlke, S.; Rebl, H.; Finke, B.; Mueller, P.; Gruening, M.; Nebe, J.B. Enhanced calcium ion mobilization in osteoblasts on amino group containing plasma polymer nanolayer. Cell Biosci. 2018, 8, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Di Toro, R.; Betti, V.; Spampinato, S. Biocompatibility and integrin-mediated adhesion of human osteoblasts to poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) copolymers. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 21, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Lv, W.; Zhang, M.; Yang, S.; Yin, L.; Hong, J.; Han, D.; Chen, C.; Swarts, S.; et al. Interleukin 11 protects bone marrow mitochondria from radiation damage. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2013, 789, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Waggoner, A.; DeBiasio, R.; Conrad, P.; Bright, G.R.; Ernst, L.; Ryan, K.; Nederlof, M.; Taylor, D. Multiple spectral parameter imaging. Methods Cell Biol. 1989, 30, 449–478. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Kubista, M.; Akerman, B.; Nordén, B. Characterization of interaction between DNA and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole by optical spectroscopy. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 4545–4553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jung, R.E.; Kokovic, V.; Jurisic, M.; Yaman, D.; Subramani, K.F.; Weber, E. Guided bone regeneration with a synthetic biodegradable membrane: a comparative study in dogs. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 2011, 22, 802–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Shen, H.; Hu, X.; Yang, F.; Bei, J.; Wang, S. Combining oxygen plasma treatment with anchorage of cationized gelatin for enhancing cell affinity of poly(lactide-co-glycolide). Biomaterials 2007, 28, 4219–4230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Khang, G.; Jeon, J.H.; Lee, J.W.; Cho, S.C.; Lee, H.B. Cell and platelet adhesions on plasma glow discharge-treated poly(lactide-co-glycolide). Biomed. Mater. Eng. 1997, 7, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Baino, F.; Novajra, G.; Vitale-Brovarone, C. Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2015, 3, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, J.; Kerns, D.G. Mechanisms of guided bone regeneration: A review. Open Dent. J. 2014, 8, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Palmer, L.C.; Newcomb, C.J.; Kaltz, S.R.; Spoerke, E.D.; Stupp, S.I. Biomimetic systems for hydroxyapatite mineralization inspired by bone and enamel. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 4754–4783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Botelho, C.M.; Brooks, R.A.; Best, S.M.; Lopes, M.A.; Santos, J.D.; Rushton, N.; Bonfield, W. Human osteoblast response to silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 79, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fielding, G.; Bose, S. SiO2 and ZnO dopants in three-dimensionally printed tricalcium phosphate bone tissue engineering scaffolds enhance osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 9137–9148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Obata, A.; Tokuda, S.; Kasuga, T. Enhanced in vitro cell activity on silicon-doped vaterite/poly(lactic acid) composites. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Pietak, A.M.; Reid, J.W.; Stott, M.J.; Sayer, M. Silicon substitution in the calcium phosphate bioceramics. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 4023–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wieland, M. Experimental Determination and Quantitative Evaluation of the Surface Composition and Topography of Medical Implant Surfaces and Their Influence on Osteoblastic Cell Surface Interactions. Ph.D. Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tiainen, H.; Wohlfahrt, J.C.; Verket, A.; Lyngstadaas, S.P.; Haugen, H.J. Bone formation in TiO2 bone scaffolds in extraction sockets of minipigs. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 2384–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ellingsen, J.E.; Thomsen, P.; Lyngstadaas, S.P. Advances in dental implant materials and tissue regeneration. Periodontol. 2000 2006, 41, 136–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Länge, K.; Herold, M.; Scheideler, L.; Geis-Gerstorfer, J.; Wendel, H.P.; Gauglitz, G. Investigation of initial pellicle formation on modified titanium dioxide (TiO2) surfaces by reflectometric interference spectroscopy (RIfS) in a model system. Dent. Mater. 2004, 20, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Terriza, A.; Vilches-Pérez, J.I.; de la Orden, E.; Yubero, F.; González-Caballero, J.L.; González-Elipe, A.R.; Vilches, J.; Salido, M. Osteoconductive Potential of Barrier NanoSiO2 PLGA Membranes Functionalized by Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapour Deposition. BioMed. Res. Int. 2014, 10, 253590. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bose, S.; Tarafder, S. Calcium phosphate ceramic systems in growth factor and drug delivery for bone tissue engineering: A review. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 1401–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Habraken, W.; Habibovic, P.; Epple, M.; Bohner, M. Calcium phosphates in biomedical applications: Materials for the future? Mater. Today 2016, 19, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microphotography of the osteoblasts on the membranes of PLGA, PLGA-HA, PLGA-SiO2, and PLGA-TiO2. Previously, the cells were fixed with 70% ethanol for five minutes, since without fixation it was not possible to observe them. Images taken at 5× with the fluorescence microscope Axio Observer A1 (Carl Zeiss). Bar in PLGA = 10 microns (same scale for all images). Filopodia are indicated with arrowheads.
Figure 1. Microphotography of the osteoblasts on the membranes of PLGA, PLGA-HA, PLGA-SiO2, and PLGA-TiO2. Previously, the cells were fixed with 70% ethanol for five minutes, since without fixation it was not possible to observe them. Images taken at 5× with the fluorescence microscope Axio Observer A1 (Carl Zeiss). Bar in PLGA = 10 microns (same scale for all images). Filopodia are indicated with arrowheads.
Materials 11 00752 g001
Figure 2. (a) Number of total cells adhered to the membranes. (b) percentage of viability of cells. *p < 0.05, statistically significant differences with respect to PLGA control membrane.
Figure 2. (a) Number of total cells adhered to the membranes. (b) percentage of viability of cells. *p < 0.05, statistically significant differences with respect to PLGA control membrane.
Materials 11 00752 g002
Figure 3. (a) Microphotography of the osteoblasts on studied membranes. (b) Representative histograms of the fluorescence visualization generated by the JC-1 probe by flow cytometry (FL2, red and FL1, green) on membranes. (c) The means + SD (standard deviation) of the ratio of the red/green fluorescence of the cells adhered to the membranes, 24 h after sowing and the value of the p-value of the Student t-test with respect to PLGA control membrane. Bar in PLGA = 10 microns (same scale for all images).
Figure 3. (a) Microphotography of the osteoblasts on studied membranes. (b) Representative histograms of the fluorescence visualization generated by the JC-1 probe by flow cytometry (FL2, red and FL1, green) on membranes. (c) The means + SD (standard deviation) of the ratio of the red/green fluorescence of the cells adhered to the membranes, 24 h after sowing and the value of the p-value of the Student t-test with respect to PLGA control membrane. Bar in PLGA = 10 microns (same scale for all images).
Materials 11 00752 g003
Figure 4. (a) Microphotography of the osteoblasts on studied membranes stained with phalloidin-TRITC 50 (red) and DAPI (blue). (b) The mean + SD of the areas of the cells adhered to the membranes is shown. Bar in PLGA = 10 microns (same scale for all images).
Figure 4. (a) Microphotography of the osteoblasts on studied membranes stained with phalloidin-TRITC 50 (red) and DAPI (blue). (b) The mean + SD of the areas of the cells adhered to the membranes is shown. Bar in PLGA = 10 microns (same scale for all images).
Materials 11 00752 g004
Figure 5. (a) Microphotography osteoblasts’ nucleus adhered on studied membranes. (b) The mean and standard deviation of the area of osteoblasts’ nucleus adhered on the membranes is shown. Bar in PLGA = 10 microns (same scale for all images).
Figure 5. (a) Microphotography osteoblasts’ nucleus adhered on studied membranes. (b) The mean and standard deviation of the area of osteoblasts’ nucleus adhered on the membranes is shown. Bar in PLGA = 10 microns (same scale for all images).
Materials 11 00752 g005
Table 1. The means and standard deviation of the ratio of the red/green fluorescence on the cells adhered in the studied membranes are shown.
Table 1. The means and standard deviation of the ratio of the red/green fluorescence on the cells adhered in the studied membranes are shown.
Ratio Red/GreenMeasure 1Measure 2Measure 3Mean SD 1
PLGA1.442.161.461.690.41
PLGA-HA2.592.662.552.570.09
PLGA-SiO22.572.182.392.380.19
PLGA-TiO21.341.431.711.490.19
1 SD: Standard Deviation.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Torres-Lagares, D.; Castellanos-Cosano, L.; Serrera-Figallo, M.-A.; López-Santos, C.; Barranco, A.; Rodríguez-González-Elipe, A.; Gutierrez-Perez, J.-L. In Vitro Comparative Study of Oxygen Plasma Treated Poly(Lactic–Co–Glycolic) (PLGA) Membranes and Supported Nanostructured Oxides for Guided Bone Regeneration Processes. Materials 2018, 11, 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050752

AMA Style

Torres-Lagares D, Castellanos-Cosano L, Serrera-Figallo M-A, López-Santos C, Barranco A, Rodríguez-González-Elipe A, Gutierrez-Perez J-L. In Vitro Comparative Study of Oxygen Plasma Treated Poly(Lactic–Co–Glycolic) (PLGA) Membranes and Supported Nanostructured Oxides for Guided Bone Regeneration Processes. Materials. 2018; 11(5):752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050752

Chicago/Turabian Style

Torres-Lagares, Daniel, Lizett Castellanos-Cosano, Maria-Angeles Serrera-Figallo, Carmen López-Santos, Angel Barranco, Agustín Rodríguez-González-Elipe, and Jose-Luis Gutierrez-Perez. 2018. "In Vitro Comparative Study of Oxygen Plasma Treated Poly(Lactic–Co–Glycolic) (PLGA) Membranes and Supported Nanostructured Oxides for Guided Bone Regeneration Processes" Materials 11, no. 5: 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050752

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop