Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Study Based on the Least Square Parameter Identification Method for State of Charge Estimation of a LiFePO4 Battery Pack Using Three Model-Based Algorithms for Electric Vehicles
Next Article in Special Issue
Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower Model: II. Optimal Best-Estimate Results with Reduced Predicted Uncertainties
Previous Article in Journal
Short-Term Price Forecasting Models Based on Artificial Neural Networks for Intraday Sessions in the Iberian Electricity Market
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2016, 9(9), 718; doi:10.3390/en9090718

Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower: I. Adjoint Sensitivity Model

Center for Nuclear Science and Energy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Erich Schneider
Received: 23 June 2016 / Revised: 23 August 2016 / Accepted: 30 August 2016 / Published: 8 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Predictive Modeling of Nuclear Energy Systems)


Cooling towers discharge waste heat from an industrial process into the atmosphere, and are essential for the functioning of large energy-producing plants, including nuclear reactors. Using a numerical simulation model of the cooling tower together with measurements of outlet air relative humidity, outlet air and water temperatures enables the quantification of the rate of thermal energy dissipation removed from the respective process. The computed quantities depend on many model parameters including correlations, boundary conditions, material properties, etc. Changes in these model parameters will induce changes in the computed quantities of interest (called “model responses”). These changes are quantified by the functional derivatives (called “sensitivities”) of the model responses with respect to the model parameters. These sensitivities are computed in this work by applying the general Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology (ASAM) for nonlinear systems. These sensitivities are needed for: (i) ranking the parameters in their importance to contributing to response uncertainties; (ii) propagating the uncertainties (covariances) in these model parameters to quantify the uncertainties (covariances) in the model responses; (iii) performing predictive modeling, including assimilation of experimental measurements and calibration of model parameters to produce optimal predicted quantities (both model parameters and responses) with reduced predicted uncertainties. View Full-Text
Keywords: cooling tower; adjoint sensitivity analysis; adjoint cooling tower model solution verification cooling tower; adjoint sensitivity analysis; adjoint cooling tower model solution verification

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cacuci, D.G.; Fang, R. Predictive Modeling of a Paradigm Mechanical Cooling Tower: I. Adjoint Sensitivity Model. Energies 2016, 9, 718.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top