Next Article in Journal
Extracting Steady State Components from Synchrophasor Data Using Kalman Filters
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Objective Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plants Using Pure and Mixed Working Fluids
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Day-Ahead Scheduling of a Smart Distribution Grid Considering Reactive Power Capability of Distributed Generation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling and Experimental Validation of a Volumetric Expander Suitable for Waste Heat Recovery from an Automotive Internal Combustion Engine Using an Organic Rankine Cycle with Ethanol
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2016, 9(5), 313; doi:10.3390/en9050313

Combined Turbine and Cycle Optimization for Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems—Part A: Turbine Model

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Nils Koppels Allé, Building 403, Kongens Lyngby 2800, Denmark
2
Laboratorio di Fluidodinamica delle Macchine, Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, Milan I-20156, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Sylvain Quoilin
Received: 21 March 2016 / Revised: 14 April 2016 / Accepted: 18 April 2016 / Published: 25 April 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1712 KB, uploaded 25 April 2016]   |  

Abstract

Axial-flow turbines represent a well-established technology for a wide variety of power generation systems. Compactness, flexibility, reliability and high efficiency have been key factors for the extensive use of axial turbines in conventional power plants and, in the last decades, in organic Rankine cycle power systems. In this two-part paper, an overall cycle model and a model of an axial turbine were combined in order to provide a comprehensive preliminary design of the organic Rankine cycle unit, taking into account both cycle and turbine optimal designs. Part A presents the preliminary turbine design model, the details of the validation and a sensitivity analysis on the main parameters, in order to minimize the number of decision variables in the subsequent turbine design optimization. Part B analyzes the application of the combined turbine and cycle designs on a selected case study, which was performed in order to show the advantages of the adopted methodology. Part A presents a one-dimensional turbine model and the results of the validation using two experimental test cases from literature. The first case is a subsonic turbine operated with air and investigated at the University of Hannover. The second case is a small, supersonic turbine operated with an organic fluid and investigated by Verneau. In the first case, the results of the turbine model are also compared to those obtained using computational fluid dynamics simulations. The results of the validation suggest that the model can predict values of efficiency within ± 1.3%-points, which is in agreement with the reliability of classic turbine loss models such as the Craig and Cox correlations used in the present study. Values similar to computational fluid dynamics simulations at the midspan were obtained in the first case of validation. Discrepancy below 12 % was obtained in the estimation of the flow velocities and turbine geometry. The values are considered to be within a reasonable range for a preliminary design tool. The sensitivity analysis on the turbine model suggests that two of twelve decision variables of the model can be disregarded, thus further reducing the computational requirements of the optimization. View Full-Text
Keywords: organic Rankine cycle (ORC); axial turbine design; combined optimization; turbine experimental validation; turbine sensitivity analysis organic Rankine cycle (ORC); axial turbine design; combined optimization; turbine experimental validation; turbine sensitivity analysis
Figures

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Meroni, A.; La Seta, A.; Andreasen, J.G.; Pierobon, L.; Persico, G.; Haglind, F. Combined Turbine and Cycle Optimization for Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems—Part A: Turbine Model. Energies 2016, 9, 313.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top