Energies 2012, 5(11), 4288-4322; doi:10.3390/en5114288
Article

A Comparison of Wind Flow Models for Wind Resource Assessment in Wind Energy Applications

1 École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada 2 K.C. Irving Chair in Sustainable Development, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB E1A 3E9, Canada
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 August 2012; in revised form: 22 October 2012 / Accepted: 23 October 2012 / Published: 29 October 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wind Turbines)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [4555 KB, uploaded 29 October 2012 13:50 CET]
Abstract: The objective of this work was to assess the accuracy of various coupled mesoscale-microscale wind flow modeling methodologies for wind energy applications. This is achieved by examining and comparing mean wind speeds from several wind flow modeling methodologies with observational measurements from several 50 m met towers distributed across the study area. At the mesoscale level, with a 5 km resolution, two scenarios are examined based on the Mesoscale Compressible Community Model (MC2) model: the Canadian Wind Energy Atlas (CWEA) scenario, which is based on standard input data, and the CWEA High Definition (CWEAHD) scenario where high resolution land cover input data is used. A downscaling of the obtained mesoscale wind climate to the microscale level is then performed, where two linear microscale models, i.e., MsMicro and the Wind Atlas Analysis and Application Program (WAsP), are evaluated following three downscaling scenarios: CWEA-WAsP, CWEA-MsMicro and CWEAHD-MsMicro. Results show that, for the territory studied, with a modeling approach based on the MC2 and MsMicro models, also known as Wind Energy Simulation Toolkit (WEST), the use of high resolution land cover and topography data at the mesoscale level helps reduce modeling errors for both the mesoscale and microscale models, albeit only marginally. At the microscale level, results show that the MC2-WAsP modeling approach gave substantially better results than both MC2 and MsMicro modeling approaches due to tweaked meso-micro coupling.
Keywords: wind flow models; wind resource assessment; WAsP; MC2; MsMicro; microscale; mesoscale

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Gasset, N.; Landry, M.; Gagnon, Y. A Comparison of Wind Flow Models for Wind Resource Assessment in Wind Energy Applications. Energies 2012, 5, 4288-4322.

AMA Style

Gasset N, Landry M, Gagnon Y. A Comparison of Wind Flow Models for Wind Resource Assessment in Wind Energy Applications. Energies. 2012; 5(11):4288-4322.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gasset, Nicolas; Landry, Mathieu; Gagnon, Yves. 2012. "A Comparison of Wind Flow Models for Wind Resource Assessment in Wind Energy Applications." Energies 5, no. 11: 4288-4322.

Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert