Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Efficient Operation for Electromechanical Brake Using Maximum Torque per Ampere Control
Previous Article in Journal
Response-Based Assessment of Operational Limits for Mating Blades on Monopile-Type Offshore Wind Turbines
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/en12101868
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Pressure on the Removal of NH3 from Hydrolyzed and Pre-Fermented Slaughterhouse Waste for Better Biomethanization

by
Aleš Zver
1,
Rajko Bernik
2 and
Rok Mihelič
2,*
1
KG Lendava d.d., Glavna ulica 115, 9220 Lendava, Slovenia
2
Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2019, 12(10), 1868; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12101868
Submission received: 4 March 2019 / Revised: 4 May 2019 / Accepted: 9 May 2019 / Published: 16 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section A4: Bio-Energy)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Slaughterhouse waste (SW) is potentially a good source of biomethane; however, its excessive ammonia content quickly causes inhibition of microbial processes. Our aim was therefore to remove ammonia from SW before putting it into a biogas reactor. Experimental 120 L pressure container was constructed to observe NH3 removal from diluted slaughterhouse waste at constant air flow of 144 NL/min, temperature 130 °C, and at different pressures: 300 kPa, 600 kPa, and 900 kPa. SW was first allowed to hydrolyze for 14 days at 38 °C. The SW was diluted with water (DSW) to 8.4% dry matter (DM) and forcibly aerated for 334 min. From the DSW, 0.7%, 3.8%, and 9% of initial total N were removed at 300 kPa, 600 kPa, and 900 kPa, respectively. However, the C/N ratio changed only slightly, from the initial 4.38 to 3.17, which is not a promising result for biomethanization. Further research on the presented system with the addition of bases might be promising to remove more ammonia.

1. Introduction

Organic waste can be an important source of new compounds, nutritional substances, and products such as biofuel, e.g., biogas. Slaughterhouse waste (SW), used as a basis for our research, is rich in protein [1]. Protein decomposition in a biogas reactor can be observed from the increase of volatile organic acids (VOA) and release of ammonium [2]. Ammonium’s nitrogen inhibits the digestion process in high concentrations, especially at high pH of the digestion broth, when volatile ammonia (NH3) is formed [3]. The total ammonium nitrogen content in a biogas fermenter is in the range from 1.7 to 14 g/L and becomes inhibitory at concentrations from 759 to 4000 mg N/L [4,5,6]. Especially during the digestion of pig and poultry waste, the high quantity of volatile ammonia frequently inhibits biogas production [7,8]. An increase in gaseous ammonia is caused by increased process temperature and the alkalinity of the environment [9]. Also, differences among substrates affect this inhibitory nature [9]. NH4+ enters microorganism cells, causes proton imbalance, and runs counter to the metabolic enzymes in microorganisms [3,10]. During inhibition, the fermenting substrate starts accumulating VOA, which additionally decelerates other phases of digestion [3,11]. In the worst-case scenario, such inhibition can last for months and can seriously affect the economic outcome of biogas plants. This is why research is focused on balancing the ammonia content [11].
Various methods of removing ammonia from the wastes/mixtures before putting them into the biogas reactor have been tested. Ammonia can be removed via the method of air stripping with increased pH and temperature [12], with ion exchangers [13], by struvite precipitation [14], and with biological processes [15]. Increasing the C/N ratio of input materials is also a good method of preventing inhibition by ammonia [1]. Dilution of ammonia-rich mixtures with water proved to be an effective and economically acceptable method in terms of stability and methane yield [16]; however, it can seriously lower the energy value of the substrate and, hence, the production of biogas [17]. The inhibitory effect of ammonia can be diminished also by adding ion-exchange capacity materials, such as bentonites, glauconites, and phosphorites, that can bind nitrogen in its ammonium (NH4+) form [18,19]. The use of specialized microbial associations and adaptation of the existing microbial associations can ease the ammonia burden [20]. Ammonia removal can also be done with the use of membranes [21] by affecting the balance of NH3 and NH4+ by changing the pH and temperature. NH3 was dissociated through the pores of the membranes sized between 0.1 and 5 μm [22,23]. Recently, an informative review on the development in ammonia stripping process was published by Kinidi et al. [24].
For the biogas fermentation of high-ammonia substrates, thermophilic fermentation at 55 °C proved to be a better option as it did not result in such high inhibition as in the mesophilic process. Temperature is of crucial importance as a higher temperature facilitates increased removal of NH3 from liquid to biogas [23,24,25].
Although various methods have been researched and tested, there is to our knowledge, a lack of research on ammonia removal with increased pressure from hydrolyzed and pre-fermented slaughterhouse waste. The concentration of a solute gas in a solution is proportional to the partial pressure of that gas above the solution and the solubility of gases generally decreases with increasing temperature (Henry’s law). Hence, higher pressure would lower the volatility of ammonia. However, free ammonia formation is not just partial pressure dependent. Ammonia release is also very much pH dependent: The volatility of ammonia in an aqueous solution can be enhanced by increasing the pH [26].
[ NH 3 ] a q u e o u s + [ H 2 O ] ↔ [ N H 4 + ] + [ O H − ]
High pressure can also help hydrolysis of proteinaceous material and release of soluble ammonium N, which would further enhance the possibility of N removal from slaughterhouse waste. Our contribution is therefore an experiment of a novel approach to ammonia removal for nitrogen-rich waste. For this purpose, we made a pilot-scale experimental pressure chamber. Our hypothesis is that the system presented in this study will effectively remove ammonia from pre-hydrolyzed SW and thus increase the C/N ratio of the SW, which would both render the mixture more suitable for anaerobic biogas fermentation and increase methane yield.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Hydrolysis and Fermentation

SW was dried and ground to a powder with particle size up to 1.5 mm. A Bremey 551.0 grinder (Type 31; Meyer Mühlenbau AG, Solothurn Switzerland) was used for grinding to produce a homogeneous input for further treatment.
The SW was diluted with water to obtain the percentage of dry matter (DM) in the mixture that would allow easy transport via pipelines by means of pumps. Accordingly, diluted SW (DSW) made up of 60 g of SW moist paste with 53.2% DM (Figure 1) and 300 g of H2O was set for five repetitions. In terms of volume, this represents 16.7% SW and 83.3% H2O. The DSW contained 8.4% DM and 6.8% ODM. An automatic methane potential test system (AMPTS), Bioprocess Control AB, Sweden, was used in the laboratory (bench-scale) trial. Each mixture was then put into a fermenter with a 0.5 L volume and placed in a water bath at 38 °C. The content was mixed at a frequency of 15 revolutions per minute; an automatic stirrer was switched on every 5 min. The anaerobic fermentation lasted for 32 days. During this period, the total quantity of the generated gas was measured by the AMPTS system. The measurements of CO2 and other gasses were not performed since we removed the CO2 traps from AMPTS system.
The entire experimental processes are shown in the diagram in Figure 1.
The need for a larger quantity of the anaerobically fermented mixture prompted us to mix the same input ratio increased by 100 times, i.e., 6 kg of SW paste and 30 kg of H2O put in a 50 L container. This was done simultaneously with the laboratory pre-trial (Figure 1). The mixture in the container was waterproofed and placed in a water bath at 38 ± 0.5 °C. A special stirrer was used to mix it thoroughly for 5 min three times per day. Once per day, a sample was taken by means of a special probe which prevented air from entering the container during sampling. The generated gases were then channeled to a bio filter via a pipe. Once per day, the gases were analyzed by means of a portable gas analyzer (Dräger: X–am 7000; Dräger Slovenija d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia). The following parameters were set for the following methods: infrared sensor (IR) EX sensor for the measurement of methane (measurement range 0–100% by volume); IR CO2 HC sensor for the measurement of carbon dioxide concentrations (measurement range 0–100% by volume); electro-chemical (EC) O2 sensor for the measurement of the oxygen content (measurement range 0–25% by volume); EC H2S HC sensor for the measurement of hydrogen sulfide (measurement range 0–200 ppm); EC NH3 sensor for the measurement of ammonia (measurement range 0–2000 ppm).

2.2. Overpressure Ammonia Removal

After hydrolysis, the DSW was placed in a specially adapted pressure vessel with a 120 L volume (Figure 1 and Figure 2) with integrated nozzles that that provide the incoming air, which then mixes the content, and allow overpressure ammonia expulsion.
The vessel has three openings on the lid. A manometer is attached to one of them, another lets out the outgoing air, while the third one is intended for the measurement of temperature. On the sides, the vessel contains an opening for sampling and the attached nozzles. The vessel has two layers. The inner vessel was made to resist high pressure up to 2000 kPa, while the outer vessel is intended for pressure of 500 kPa. Both areas have a relief valve that protects them from the overload. The outer part is intended for a thermal-oil bath with three 1000 W electric heaters submerged in the oil. The thermostat in the layer regulates the temperature of the layer, which then heats the inner vessel. Overpressure was created by means of a NU AIR B2800/100 CM3 V230 compressor, (Nuair, Torino, Italy) and the air was channeled via pipes into the three nozzles in the reactor. The pipe was equipped with a non-return valve that prevented the air or mixture from returning to the compressor. The air stripping was regulated with the valve. It also enabled us to separately regulate the air flow to an individual nozzle. The pressure of the incoming air was regulated with the pressure regulator located on the compressor. The quantity of the incoming air was measured with an air-flow measuring device (Side-Trak Mass Flow Meter, model: 830M-2-OV1-SV1-V4-HP; https://www.sierrainstruments.com/).
The content—DSW—was air stripped at different pressures in the vessel (300 kPa, 600 kPa, and 900 kPa), while the air flow rate was constant at 143.8 NL/min and the temperature remained 130 °C during the entire experiment (Figure 1). The only variable was the pressure. The air stripping lasted for 334 min. The air passing through the vessel also removed ammonia, which was measured in the outgoing air by means of a gas analyzer (ECHO) with inbuilt EC NH3 sensors [27] and is expressed as a volume ratio (mg/L).

2.3. Other Measurements

Measurements of total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), and pH were done according to the American Public Health Association APHA standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [28]. VOA and total inorganic carbon (TIC) were determined using the TIM 840 titrator from HACH LANGE (Hach Lange d.o.o., Domžale, Slovenia) following the instructions of the manufacturer. For the measurements of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N and free NH3), we used a modified Berthelot reaction; after organic nitrogen digestion, free ammonia is produced by high pH. Dialysis is then used to capture the released ammonia in a buffered and chlorinated stream. With salicylate addition, 5-aminosalicylate is formed. TKN and ammonium-N were measured using a SAN++ Continuous Flow Analyzer (Skalar Analytical B.V., The Netherlands (https://www.skalar.com/) [29]. The gas composition was determined using a Dräger X–am 7000. Measurements of an individual parameter were performed with three repetitions (n = 3). Cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead were determined according to SIST EN 14083 [30] and mercury according to ISO 16772 [31], while calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc were determined according to ISO 6869 [32]. Crude fiber was determined according to ISO 5983-2 [33], crude protein according to ISO 6865 [34], and crude fat according to Commission Directive 98/64 [35], while the gross energy (calorific) value was determined according to CEN/TS 15400 [36]. The C and N were determined by means of a Vario MAX CN instrument working on the principle of combustion according to SIST ISO 13878 [37]. The C/N ratio was calculated from these measurements.

3. Results

3.1. Changes During the Hydrolysis/Anaerobic Fermentation

The SW analysis, which served as the trial basis, is shown in Table 1. The SW was dry (95% DM) and contained 83% ODM; its gross energy value was 22.56 kJ/g SW. The material was slightly acidic (pH(H2O) = 6.11). The main constituent was crude proteinaceous matter (63%). The content of fats was about 15%, whereas the amount of fibers was small (<3%). It was rich in minerals (crude ash content ca. 16%), of which Ca and P were the main elements. The level of potentially toxic elements like Ni, Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Hg, and Cr was low. The level of N was very high (10.1%), giving the SW a very low C/N ratio of 4.4; this is unfavorable for anaerobic fermentation to biomethane, as the optimal ratio is between 25 and 35 [38].
The SW was mixed with water to get diluted SW (DSW: 1 part SW paste to 5 parts H2O; w/V; Figure 1), and allowed to hydrolyze and ferment in anaerobic conditions described in the Section 2.1. During the hydrolysis and fermentation, changes in the pH, DM, ODM, TIC, VOA, VOA/TIC, NH4-N, total N, and energy value of the input were monitored (Table 2). In the SW, nitrogen was present predominantly in proteins. For this reason, SW was first hydrolyzed to disintegrate proteins into NH4-N and fats into VOA. After 30 days, the process was almost complete; this was confirmed by the measurements of pH, VOA, and TIC (Table 2, Figure 3). After 15 days, the production of VOA reached nearly a plateau (Figure 3). That is why a 15-day period of anaerobic fermentation was set for putting the hydrolyzed DSW from the pilot scale hydrolysis, 50 L containers, into the pressure vessel (120 L) for ammonia stripping. The fresh DSW mixture contained 21,746 mg/L of TKN and 189 mg of NH4-N (Table 2). After a 15-day hydrolysis and fermentation period (Figure 3), 8788 mg/L of NH4-N and 23,500 mg/L of VOA were generated in the mixture, which might have caused complete inhibition of methanogenesis; there was no CH4 in the outgoing gases. The ammonia inhibition is discussed later. In addition, the generated quantity of NH4-N also inhibited hydrolysis, but not completely, as a slow increase of VOA was still present (Table 2).
Gas was emitted during the hydrolysis and fermentation. In the 15-day period, the mixture emitted 16.66 ± 0.49 NL gas per kilogram of dry sample containing 32% CO2, 0% O2, 0.5% CH4, 1500 µL/L H2S, and 1084 µL/L NH3. Furthermore, the outgoing gas contained other volatile compounds that emitted a very strong smell. The remaining gas in the outgoing air had to be mainly composed of N2 (Figure 3).
The VOA content increased to 23,501 ± 125 mg/L during the 15-day hydrolysis and fermentation period. After 15 days, the increase in the VOA content levelled out. A similar trend was observed for pH, which also did not significantly increase after 15 days. It was interesting that the pH went from slightly acidic and stabilized at neutral reaction in spite of the high VOA production. The organic acid production was continuously neutralized by ammonium and TIC production during the degradation of organics, which both caused alkaline reactions. An increase in the TIC content decreased the VOA/TIC ratio after 15 days of hydrolysis and fermentation according to the reduced trend of VOA production. In 15 days, due to the released gases, the mixture was energetically just slightly impoverished by 393 kJ per gram of SW DM or 1.77% based on the initial gross energy value of DSW (Table 2).

3.2. Overpressure Ammonia Stripping

The main aim of our trial was to remove ammonia at 130 °C and at fixed pressures: 300 kPa, 600 kPa, and 900 kPa. By this we followed and exceeded the legal requirements that SW should be pre-treated at 130 °C and at 300 kPa pressure for at least 20 min [39].
We succeeded to remove only 98.0 mg/L, 519.7 mg/L, and 1138.1 mg/L NH3-N or, expressed in relation to the initial TKN, 0.7%, 3.8%, and 9% at 300 kPa, 600 kPa, and 900 kPa, respectively (Table 2). Relatively inefficient ammonia removal was probably caused by neutral pH in the hydrolyzed and fermented mixture. Although the alkali forming NH4-N was high after hydrolysis (8800 mg/L), a neutral to slightly acid DSW was probably caused by high concentration of VOA (23,500 mg/L; Table 2). The pressure treatment further increased VOA to max. 47,000 mg/L at 600 kPa. In the stripping process pH of DSW decreased from initial 6.9 to 6.1, 5.6, and 5.9 at 300 kPa, 600 kPa, and 900 kPa, respectively. This pH decrease was caused by VOA formation and by the removal of NH3 with the exhausted air (Figure 4 and Figure 5 and Table 2).
The high VOA content (and consequently lower pH) and high ammonia inhibited the methanogenic process, which is why the outgoing gases during hydrolysis did not include methane. At the beginning of the stripping process (the end of hydrolysis and pre-fermentation), the VOA content was 23,501 mg/L. It increased during the stripping process and reached its peak of 46,697 mg/L at 600 kPa pressure; it was lower at 300 kPa (28,840 mg/L) and at 900 kPa (30,781 mg/L). The VOA content is reflected by the pH level drop at each pressure (Table 2; Figure 5).
The latter proves that, in addition to ammonia, higher pressure also promotes the removal of carbon-containing compounds (CO2 and other volatile organic compounds, such as VOA), which is reflected in the drop of the C/N ratio, from 4.38 ± 0.04 to 3.17 ± 0.03 (at 900 kPa pressure) (Table 2). Thus, the higher the pressure in stripping, the lower the C/N ratio at the end.
At the beginning of the stripping process, after 60 min of pressure stripping, pH rose up to 8.35 and then started decreasing (Figure 5). The initial increase in pH might be a result of the loss of the short-chain VOA and simultaneous ammonification process.
During the stripping process the concentration of VOA increased during ammonia pressure removal, while the TIC slowly decreased (Table 2). The increased concentration of VOA, and ammonia removal were reflected in a gradual decrease of pH (Figure 5); the pH decreased almost on a linear basis relative to the removed NH3 (Figure 5). The lowest pH occurred at 600 kPa, which was linked to the highest increase of VOA content.

4. Discussion

Our idea was that by the proposed procedure nitrogen would be effectively stripped, rendering energy rich DSW, with substantially lower N content, which would allow higher loading rates of slaughterhouse waste in biogas reactor. Adjustment of NH4-N and free ammonia content of input material (like DSW) into biogas plant is one of the important parameters in basic process control for successful biogas plant operation [40]. Volatile ammonia (NH3) can be a strong inhibitor of anaerobiosis above threshold concentrations. The majority of research found the toxic level of total ammonium nitrogen for methanogenesis at around 1700 mg/L with non-acclimated inoculum, while with acclimation, no inhibition was apparent up to 5000 mg/L. If the pH is controlled bellow 8.1, the tolerable limit of NH4-N is even as high as 6000 mg/L [41]. Under the same conditions, the toxic level of free ammonia (NH3) appeared already at ca. 200 mg/L; if, however, the substrate was rich in soluble organic matter, and microbes were acclimatized, the ammonium toxicity appeared at concentrations from 400 to 800 mg/L [40,41]. In our experiment, the total ammonia (NH4-N) level at the end of hydrolysis was at a very high level of 8800 mg/L. Immediately after starting to raise the pressure to 300, 600, or 900 kPa, the free ammonia levels raised abruptly from nearly zero to 750 mg/L, 400 mg/L, and 200 mg/L, respectively (Figure 4). The ammonium-N level dropped significantly during the pressure removal period (6 h), but even at the highest pressure, 900 kPa, where the ammonia removal was the most successful (Figure 5), it stayed at a high level (5800 mg NH4-N/L) at the end of the procedure. These high levels could probably cause inhibition of methanogenesis, although free ammonia was not so abundant, as the pH was not very alkaline (the highest was up to 8.35 at 900 kPa). The alkalinity lasted just for a short period of ca. 2–3 h; after that time, the production of VOA lowered the pH and prevented further ammonia volatilization (Figure 5). The reduced pH of the DSW during ammonia stripping caused a loop: the lower the pH, the lesser the generation of NH3. Regardless of the pressure used in the treatment, the ammonia removal was greatly reduced when the pH dropped below 6.0 (Figure 4 and Figure 5). In general terms, the stripping of the hydrolyzed SW mixture did not achieve all of the pursued objectives. Nitrogen was partially removed, which was our goal. However, more C was lost during the process, which rules out our initial prediction that the process would optimize the C/N ratio and improve the ammonia-cleared input for digestion all the way to methane.
Other researchers stripped ammonia from anaerobically metabolized digestate at lower temperatures and at only slightly increased pressure but at changed pH levels with various alkaline compounds. In his trial, Guštin [42] alkalized the digestate with NaOH treatment to pH 12, which resulted in 88.3% removal of TKN and 96.8% of NH4-N from the digestate at a continuous air flow of 2.5 L/s. In our case, with a very similar air flow rate (143 L/min = 2.38 L/s) but at pH below 8.0 for most of the stripping time, the nitrogen removal was only on the level of 0.7%, 3.8%, and 9% of the initial total N level at 300, 600, and 900 kPa pressure, respectively.
During ammonia pressure removal, the concentration of VOA increased to very high levels compared to reference data of mixed slaughterhouse waste digestion with similar initial total solids and volatile solids composition. Water evaporation, which might be the cause for augmenting of VOA concentration, was not directly measured, but since dry matter content was also decreasing during the process, we can deduce that water evaporation was not high. In our case, VOA levels increased up to 47,000 mg/L (at 600 kPa; Table 2) compared to 10,000 mg/L in the experiment by Ortner et al. [43], who succeeded in lowering the level of VOA by addition of trace nutrients such as Ni, Co, or Mo. In our case, the Ni content was low (<1 mg/kg; we did not analyze SW for Co and Mo), so consideration of these trace elements’ concentrations in SW should be made in the future development of our method. Such extremely high VOA levels consumed the buffer capacity of DSW, which was observed from the gradual decreasing of TIC. After 3 h of pressure stripping, the pH of the DSW dropped below 6.5, which is sub-optimal for methane production. The pH fell to as low as 5.5 after 6 h (Figure 5). The addition of buffer material (bicarbonates) could prevent acidification but can also prevent free ammonia (NH3) accumulation by forming carbamic acid (H2NCOOH) and carbamates (2 NH3 + CO2 → NH4[H2NCO2]) [43].

5. Conclusions

In this experiment, we tested the possibility of removing excess ammonia from N-rich, hydrolyzed, and DSW by air blowing using different overpressures. It was proven that an increase in pressure from 300 kPa to 900 kPa positively influenced the removal of ammonia from the mixture; however, the removal was very low compared to that by, e.g., alkaline processes. In addition to NH3, other volatile compounds were also removed; these are to be determined in detail by further research. The loss of volatile substances further narrowed the C/N ratio, which was already too low in the initial substrate (DSW) for optimal biogas digestion. For further development of the here-presented method of ammonia removal from N-rich biogas substrates, pressure could be combined with moderate substrate alkalization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Z. and R.M.; Methodology, A.Z., R.M., and R.B.; Validation, A.Z., R.M., and R.B.; Formal Analysis, A.Z., R.M., and R.B.; Investigation, A.Z. and R.M.; Resources, A.Z.; Data Curation, A.Z., R.M. and R.B.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.Z. and R.M.; Writing—Review and Editing, A.Z. and R.M.; Supervision, R.M. and R.B.; Funding Acquisition, A.Z. and R.M.

Funding

This research was funded by European Union, European Social Fund. The experiment was implemented in the framework of the Operational Program for Human Resources Development for the Period 2007–2013, Priority axis 1: Promoting entrepreneurship and adaptability, Main type of activity 1.1: Experts and researchers for competitive enterprises. The present article was written as part of doctoral dissertation which was financed by the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Slovenia and from the European Social Fund of the European Union.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude and appreciation for the co-financing and research grant. The authors acknowledge the support of the companies Keter Invest, Keter Organica, and University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty for access to laboratories and research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Banks, C.J.; Wang, Z. Development of a two phase anaerobic digester for the treatment of mixed abattoir wastes. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 40, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hansen, K.H.; Angelidaki, I.; Ahring, B.K. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Inhibition by ammonia. Water Res. 1998, 32, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hansen, K.H.; Angelidaki, I.; Ahring, B.K. Improved digestion of swine manure in thermophilic biogas reactors. Water Res. 1999, 33, 1805–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Y.; Cheng, J.J.; Creamer, K.S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4044–4064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ashrafizadeh, S.N.; Khorasani, Z. Ammonia removal from aqueous solutions using hollow-fiber membrane contactors. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 162, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Siegrist, H.; Batstone, D. Free ammonia and pH inhibition of acetotrophic methanogenesis at mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. In Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion, Proceedings Part 1, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2–6 September 2001; pp. 395–400. [Google Scholar]
  7. Braun, R.; Huber, P.; Meyrath, J. Ammonia toxicity in liquid piggery manure digestion. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981, 3, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Webb, A.R.; Hawkers, F.R. The anaerobic digestion of poultry manure: Variation of gas yield with influent concentration and ammonium-nitrogen levels. Agric. Wastes 1985, 14, 135–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Angelidaki, I.; Ahring, B.K. Anaerobic thermophilic digestion of manure at different ammonia loads: Effect of temperature. Water Res. 1994, 28, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gallert, A.; Bauer, S.; Winter, J. Effect of ammonia on the anaerobic degradation of protein by a mesophilic and thermophilic biowaste population. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 50, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nielsen, H.B.; Ahring, B.K. Effect of tryptone and ammonia on the biogas process in continuously stirred tank reactors treating cattle manure. Environ. Technol. 2007, 28, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, L.; Jahng, D. Enhanced anaerobic digestion of piggery wastewater by ammonia stripping: effects of alkali types. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 182, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wirthensohn, T.; Waeger, F.; Jelinek, L.; Fuchs, W. Ammonium removal from anaerobic digester effluent by ion exchange. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 60, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Uludag-Demirer, S.; Demirer, G.N.; Chen, S. Ammonia Removal from Anaerobically Digested Dairy Manure by Struvite Precipitation. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 3667–3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ahn, Y.H. Sustainable nitrogen elimination biotechnologies: A review. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 1709–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nielsen, H.B.; Angelidaki, I. Strategies for optimizing recovery of the biogas process following ammonia inhibition. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7995–8001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kayhanian, M. Ammonia Inhibition in High-Solids Biogasification: An Overview and Practical Solutions. Environ. Technol. 1999, 20, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Angelidaki, I.; Ahring, B.K. Effect of the clay mineral bentonite on ammonia inhibition of anaerobic thermophilic reactors degrading animal waste. Biodegradation 1993, 3, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Krylova, N.I.; Khabiboulline, R.E.; Naumova, R.P.; Nagel, M.A. The influence of ammonium and methods for removal during the anaerobic treatment of poultry manure. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1997, 70, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Calli, B.; Mertoglu, B.; Inanc, B.; Yenigun, O. Effects of high free ammonia concentrations on the performances of anaerobic bioreactors. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 1285–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hasanoglu, A.; Romero, J.; Perez, B.; Plaza, A. Ammonia removal from wastewater streams through membrane contactors: Experimental and theoretical analysis of operation parameters and configuration. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 160, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Anthonisen, A.C.; Loehr, R.C.; Prakasam TB, S.; Srinath, E.G. Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1976, 48, 835–852. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lauterböck, A.; Nikolausz, M.; Lv, Z.; Baumgartner, M.; Liebhard, G.; Fuchs, W. Improvement of anaerobic digestion performance by continuous nitrogen removal with a membrane contactor treating a substrate rich in ammonia and sulfide. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 158, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kinidi, L.; Tan, I.A.W.; Wahab, N.B.A.; Tamrin, K.F.B.; Hipolito, C.N.; Salleh, S.F. Recent Development in Ammonia Stripping Process for Industrial Wastewater Treatment. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 2018, 3181087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Angelidaki, I.; Ellegaard, L. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2003, 109, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Smith, F.L.; Harvey, A.H. Avoid Common Pitfalls When Using Henry’s Law. Chem. Eng. Prog. 2007, 103, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ni, J.-Q.; Heber, J.A. Sampling and Measurement of Ammonia Concentration at Animal Facilities - A Review. In The Society for Engineering in Agricultural, Food, and Biological Systems; Paper Number: 01-4090; ASAE: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  28. American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kolbl, S.; Paloczi, A.; Panjan, J.; Stres, B. Addressing case specific biogas plant tasks: industry oriented methane yields derived from 5 l Automatic Methane Potential Test Systems in batch or semi-continuous tests using realistic inocula, substrate particle sizes and organic loading. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 153, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. SIST EN 14083: Foodstuffs—Determination of Trace Elements—Determination of Lead, Cadmium, Chromium and Molybdenum by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (GFAAS) after Pressure Digestion; Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo (SIST): Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2003.
  31. SO 16772: Soil Quality Determination of Mercury in Aqua Regia Soil Extracts with Cold-Vapour Atomic Spectrometry or Cold-Vapour Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  32. ISO 6869: Animal Feeding Stuffs. Determination of the Contents of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Potassium, Sodium and Zinc. Method Using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
  33. ISO 5983-2: Animal Feeding Stuffs—Determination of Nitrogen Content and Calculation of Crude Protein Content—Part 2: Block Digestion and Steam Distillation Method; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  34. SIST EN ISO 6865: Animal Feeding Stuffs—Determination of Crude Fibre Content—Method with Intermediate Filtration (ISO 6865:2000); Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo (SIST): Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2001.
  35. Commission Directive 98/64/EC Community Methods of Analysis for the Determination of Amino-Acids, Crude Oils and Fats, and Olaquindox in Feeding Stuffs; The Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 1998.
  36. CEN/TS 15400: Solid Recovered Fuels. Methods for the Determination of Calorific Value; European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
  37. SIST ISO 13878: Soil Quality—Determination of Total Nitrogen Content after Dry Combustion (Incineration at 900 °C in the CN Analyser and Defining with the TCD Detector); Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo (SIST): Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1995.
  38. Polprasert, D. Organic Waste Recycling. In Technology and Management, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, UK, 1996; 412p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council: Health Rules Concerning Animal By-Products Not Intended for Human Consumption; The Publications Office of the European Union: Luxemburg, 2002.
  40. Holm-Nielsen, J.B.; Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. The Biogas Handbook: Science, Production and Applications; Wellinger, A., Murphy, J.D., Baxter, D., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 228–247. ISBN 978-0-85709-741-5. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yenigün, O.; Demirel, B. Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: A review. Process Biochem. 2013, 48, 901–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guštin, S.; Marinšek-Logar, R. Effect of pH, temperature and air flow rate on the continuous ammonia stripping of the anaerobic digestion effluent. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2011, 89, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ortner, M.; Leitzinger, K.; Skupien, S.; Bochmann, G.; Fuchs, W. Efficient anaerobic mono-digestion of N-rich slaughterhouse waste: Influence of ammonia, temperature and trace elements. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 174, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Energies 12 01868 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagram of the nitrogen removal trial. Homogenized slaughterhouse waste (SW) was first mixed with some water to obtain SW paste which was further diluted with water to get mixture containing ca. 8% DM. Diluted SW was anaerobically hydrolyzed and fermented in pre-trials (0.5 L and 50 L containers), and then in the pilot size 120 L pressure vessel, where ammonia was removed under three different pressures (300, 600, and 900 kPa), at constant temperature (T = 130 °C), and air flow (144 NL/min).
Figure 1. Diagram of the nitrogen removal trial. Homogenized slaughterhouse waste (SW) was first mixed with some water to obtain SW paste which was further diluted with water to get mixture containing ca. 8% DM. Diluted SW was anaerobically hydrolyzed and fermented in pre-trials (0.5 L and 50 L containers), and then in the pilot size 120 L pressure vessel, where ammonia was removed under three different pressures (300, 600, and 900 kPa), at constant temperature (T = 130 °C), and air flow (144 NL/min).
Energies 12 01868 g001
Energies 12 01868 g002 550
Figure 2. Pressure vessel (120 L) with overpressure ammonia stripping nozzles constructed for the purpose of the experiment. The inner vessel resists up to 2000 kPa. Outer layer contains thermal-oil bath with three 1000 W thermostatically regulated electric heaters, which heats the inner vessel. Diluted slaughterhouse waste was heated to 130 °C and air stripped with constant air flow of 144 NL/min under selected pressures, 300, 600, and 900 kPa.
Figure 2. Pressure vessel (120 L) with overpressure ammonia stripping nozzles constructed for the purpose of the experiment. The inner vessel resists up to 2000 kPa. Outer layer contains thermal-oil bath with three 1000 W thermostatically regulated electric heaters, which heats the inner vessel. Diluted slaughterhouse waste was heated to 130 °C and air stripped with constant air flow of 144 NL/min under selected pressures, 300, 600, and 900 kPa.
Energies 12 01868 g002
Energies 12 01868 g003 550
Figure 3. Changes in the DSW mixture during hydrolysis and fermentation. Values for total inorganic carbon (TIC), volatile organic acids (VOA), and pH were augmenting while the ratio VOA/TIC declined during 30 days of hydrolysis and fermentation.
Figure 3. Changes in the DSW mixture during hydrolysis and fermentation. Values for total inorganic carbon (TIC), volatile organic acids (VOA), and pH were augmenting while the ratio VOA/TIC declined during 30 days of hydrolysis and fermentation.
Energies 12 01868 g003
Energies 12 01868 g004 550
Figure 4. Ammonia stripping process: quantities of NH3 (µL/L) in the exhaust air (lines) and quantity of NH4-N (mg/L) in the DSW mixture (lines with marks). The ammonia gas (NH3) concentration in the exhausted air raised fast in the first hour after pressure increase, and later slowly declined. The ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N) content of the DSW linearly declined over 334 min of the process.
Figure 4. Ammonia stripping process: quantities of NH3 (µL/L) in the exhaust air (lines) and quantity of NH4-N (mg/L) in the DSW mixture (lines with marks). The ammonia gas (NH3) concentration in the exhausted air raised fast in the first hour after pressure increase, and later slowly declined. The ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N) content of the DSW linearly declined over 334 min of the process.
Energies 12 01868 g004
Energies 12 01868 g005 550
Figure 5. Relationship between pH (lines with open symbols) and NH4-N (lines with solid symbols) in the DSW during ammonia stripping within a 334 min timeframe at different pressures. Overpressure caused firstly abrupt short-term alkalization of DSW with pH peaks at 60 min after the start of pressure and stripping, but later the DSW acidified again. The ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N) content of the DSW linearly declined over 334 min of the process.
Figure 5. Relationship between pH (lines with open symbols) and NH4-N (lines with solid symbols) in the DSW during ammonia stripping within a 334 min timeframe at different pressures. Overpressure caused firstly abrupt short-term alkalization of DSW with pH peaks at 60 min after the start of pressure and stripping, but later the DSW acidified again. The ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N) content of the DSW linearly declined over 334 min of the process.
Energies 12 01868 g005
Table
Table 1. Analysis of dry SW.
Table 1. Analysis of dry SW.
Slaughterhouse WasteUnitResultSlaughterhouse WasteUnitResult
Dry matterg/kg953Nag/kg4.81
Moistureg/kg47.2Mgg/kg1.52
Crude proteing/kg632Cag/kg51.8
Crude fiberg/kg27.6Nimg/kg<1.00
Crude fatg/kg154Pbmg/kg<5.00
Crude ashg/kg155Cdmg/kg<0.10
Gross Energy valuekJ/g22.57Femg/kg214
pH 6.11Znmg/kg89.0
C/N 4.40Mnmg/kg10.0
Ng/kg101Cumg/kg8.00
Pg/kg26.7Hgmg/kg<0.40
Kg/kg6.10Crmg/kg<5.00
Table
Table 2. Changes in the diluted SW (DSW) during the hydrolysis and fermentation and the follow-up ammonia stripping under different pressures.
Table 2. Changes in the diluted SW (DSW) during the hydrolysis and fermentation and the follow-up ammonia stripping under different pressures.
MeasurementUnitFresh DSWDSW After 15-Day Hydrolysis300 kPa Ammonia Stripping600 kPa Ammonia Stripping900 kPa Ammonia Stripping
Gross energykJ/g DM22.26 ± 6.021.87 ± 1.1---
pH 7.26 ± 0.16.86 ± 0.016.08 ± 0.025.55 ± 0.025.85 ± 0.01
TICmg/L-7627 ± 1824920 ± 174.28879 ± 1874918 ± 147
VOAmg/L-23,501 ± 12628,840 ± 24746,697 ± 20730,781 ± 198
DM %%8.4 ± 0.128.81 ± 0.227.88 ± 0.307.55 ± 0.447.35 ± 0.17
ODM %%6.8 ± 0.206.62 ± 0.156.63 ± 0.46.40 ± 0.436.28 ± 0.37
ODM loss
C/Nratio4.38 ± 0.044.22 ± 0.063.27 ± 0.023.42 ± 0.053.17 ± 0.03
N totalmg/L21,746 ± 315,546 ± 11314,437 ± 13413,687± 13712,683 ± 90
NH4-Nmg/L189 ± 398789 ± 398038 ± 1146694 ± 1305887 ± 111
NH4-N/N total in DSW%0.956.555.748.946.4
Stripped NH3-Nmg/L 98.0519.71138.1
Relative N removal:
Stripped NH3-N/N total% 0.73.89.0
Stripped NH3-N/NH4-N% 1.27.814.2
± value = standard deviation.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zver, A.; Bernik, R.; Mihelič, R. Effect of Pressure on the Removal of NH3 from Hydrolyzed and Pre-Fermented Slaughterhouse Waste for Better Biomethanization. Energies 2019, 12, 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12101868

AMA Style

Zver A, Bernik R, Mihelič R. Effect of Pressure on the Removal of NH3 from Hydrolyzed and Pre-Fermented Slaughterhouse Waste for Better Biomethanization. Energies. 2019; 12(10):1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12101868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zver, Aleš, Rajko Bernik, and Rok Mihelič. 2019. "Effect of Pressure on the Removal of NH3 from Hydrolyzed and Pre-Fermented Slaughterhouse Waste for Better Biomethanization" Energies 12, no. 10: 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12101868

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop