Next Article in Journal
A Biophysical Perspective of IPCC Integrated Energy Modelling
Previous Article in Journal
New High Voltage Interconnections with Islands in the Mediterranean Sea: Malta and Sicily. Analysis of the Effects on Renewable Energy Sources Integration and Benefits for the Electricity Market
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Fault Detection, Localization, and Tolerant Operation of Modular Multilevel Converters with an Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) Open Circuit Fault

1
State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China
2
Power Electronics and Electric Machine Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Knoxville, TN 37932, USA
3
Department of Electrical Engineering and Electronics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GJ, UK
4
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2018, 11(4), 837; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040837
Submission received: 9 March 2018 / Revised: 30 March 2018 / Accepted: 2 April 2018 / Published: 4 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Section F: Electrical Engineering)

Abstract

:
Reliability is one of the critical issues for a modular multilevel converter (MMC) since it consists of a large number of series-connected power electronics submodules (SMs). In this paper, a complete control strategy including fault detection, localization, and tolerant operation is proposed for the MMC under an insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) open circuit fault. According to the output characteristics of the SM with the open-circuit fault of IGBT, a fault detection method based on the circulating current and output current observation is used. In order to further precisely locate the position of the faulty SM, a fault localization method based on the SM capacitor voltage observation is developed. After the faulty SM is isolated, the continuous operation of the converter is ensured by adopting the fault-tolerant strategy based on the use of redundant modules. To verify the proposed fault detection, fault localization, and fault-tolerant operation strategies, a 900 kVA MMC system under the conditions of an IGBT open circuit is developed in the Matlab/Simulink platform. The capabilities of rapid detection, precise positioning, and fault-tolerant operation of the investigated detection and control algorithms are also demonstrated.

1. Introduction

Owing to the superior characteristics of the modular design, high efficiency, low harmonic output, and so forth, modular multi-level converters (MMCs) are widely applied in the application of high voltage and power ratings, especially for high-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission systems [1,2,3]. Usually, the MMCs used for HVDC power transmission systems consist of hundreds of submodules (SMs), each with an SM adopting the half-bridge or full-bridge topology. Each half-bridge topology contains two insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) and two diodes, while each full-bridge topology is composed of four IGBTs and four diodes. From this point of view, hundreds or even thousands of power electronics devices are included in an MMC, while each power electronics device can be regarded as a potential failure point in the MMC. Thus, the fault-tolerant operation of the MMC is extremely significant.
According to the position of the failure point, the potential failure modes of a converter are categorized as external and internal failures [4]. The external failures usually include AC-side faults and DC-side faults. The common internal failures are IGBT short-circuit and open-circuit faults. The fault-tolerant operations of MMCs under external failures have been extensively investigated [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], and the IGBT short-circuit fault detection and protection techniques in terms of the internal failures are relatively mature and have been embedded into commercial gate driver boards. Compared to the IGBT short-circuit fault, the IGBT open-circuit fault is not obvious for quick detection and it results in overcurrent, overvoltage, and waveform distortion problems, leading even to the failure of the whole MMC system. To quickly detect the IGBT open-circuit fault, the sliding mode observer was used to compare the observed states with the measured states for fault detection [13,14,15]. In Reference [16], the Kalman filter was used to optimally estimate the state of an MMC and then detect the fault based on comparisons between the measured states and the estimated states. State observer based and other observer-based fault detection and location methods were developed in References [17,18,19,20], which were used to provide an estimation of the states of an MMC and detect the fault by large difference comparisons. In Reference [17], a fault detection method based on the output current and the circulating current observers and a fault localization method based on the faulty SM capacitor voltage exceeding the set threshold were proposed. However, this method is restricted to the phase-shifted carrier-based pulse width modulation (PWM) strategy and an inevitable and unpredictable delay time for the faulty SM capacitor voltage increasing would affect the fault localization speed. Even worse, all SM capacitor voltages in the same faulty arm would increase simultaneously when the MMC adopts the common carrier lamination modulation strategy with a sort-selection algorithm. In this situation, the fault localization method based on the faulty SM capacitor voltage exceeding the set threshold would make it hard to discriminate the faulty SM from normal SMs. Two fault detection methods named the Clustering Algorithm based method and Calculated Capacitance (CC) based method were proposed in Reference [21], in which the clustering algorithm was used to detect and locate the faulty SMs by identifying the pattern of the 2-D trajectories of the SM characteristic variables, and the CC-based method was based on the nominal SM capacitance calculation and comparison. However, these two methods are complicated and have large computational burdens. The above-mentioned methods are based on measured electrical signals and control strategies. Other solutions are based on hardware change by adding an extra voltage sensor in each arm of the MMC [22], or by rearranging the voltage sensor position to measure the output voltage of submodule [23,24].
After the faulty SM is identified and bypassed, the MMC is supposed to continue operating with fault tolerant schemes. Usually, depending on whether the redundant SMs are put into operation under the normal modes, the redundant modes can be categorized into the cold redundant mode [25,26] and hot redundant mode [27,28]. In the cold redundant mode, the redundant SMs are in the bypass state under normal cases and they are in the operational modes only when faults happen. The biggest disadvantage of this method is that it takes time for the capacitor voltage of the activated SM to increase from zero to the rated value, which results in the variation in the bridge arm voltage. Besides, since the redundant SMs only operate when failures are encountered, the utilization rate of the redundant SMs is greatly reduced, resulting in a relatively high cost. When the hot redundant mode is adopted, the redundant SMs are put into operation in the same way as the normal SMs in the common cases, which avoids the two main issues arising from employing the cold redundant mode.
In this paper, a complete control strategy including the fault detection, localization, and tolerant operation is proposed for the MMC under the insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) open circuit fault. The basic operation principle and characteristics of an MMC are analyzed first. According to the output characteristics of the SM with an IGBT open-circuit fault, a fault detection method based on the circulating current and output current observation is used. Considering the fact that the conventional fault localization method based on the faulty SM capacitor voltage exceeding the set threshold makes it hard to discriminate the faulty SM from the healthy SMs under the carrier lamination modulation strategy with a sort-selection algorithm, an improved fault localization strategy based on capacitor voltage difference observation is proposed. Additionally, a fault-tolerant operation based on the use of redundant SMs is adopted to guarantee the continuous operation of the converter after the bypass of the faulty SM. The proposed fault detection, fault localization, and fault-tolerant operation strategies are validated by applying a 900kVA MMC system under the condition of IGBT open-circuit faults.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 briefly introduces the basic operation principle of MMCs. Section 3 presents the improved method for fault detection, fault localization, and fault-tolerant operation. Section 4 presents the study results and Section 5 draws some conclusions.

2. The Basic Operation Principle of Modular Multilevel Converter

2.1. Basic Topology of Modular Multilevel Converter

The equivalent circuit of an MMC is shown in Figure 1, where each phase consists of the upper and lower arms, with N SMs in each arm. Usually, the half-bridge (b) or full-bridge (c) topology is employed in an SM. Vdc is the DC-bus voltage, L is the arm inductance, C is the SM capacitance, and Vc is the SM voltage. vpj and vnj are, respectively, the arm voltages produced by SMs; ipj and inj are the currents in the upper and lower arms; ij is the AC-side output currents (j = a, b, or c).
As shown in Figure 1b, a half-bridge SM is composed of two IGBTs, two diodes, and a capacitor. When S1 is turned on, the SM output voltage equals the capacitor voltage. If the arm current iarm is positive, the SM capacitor charges. On the other hand, if the arm current is negative, the SM capacitor discharges. When S2 is turned on, the output voltage of SM is 0. Regardless of the direction of the current, the capacitor voltage of SM remains the same. As shown in Figure 1c, a full-bridge SM contains four IGBTs, four diodes, and a capacitor. When S1 and S4 are turned on, the SM output voltage is equal to the capacitor voltage. If the arm current iarm is positive, the SM capacitor charges. If the arm current is negative, the SM capacitor discharges. When S2 and S3 are turned on, the SM output voltage is equal to the negative capacitor voltage. If the arm current is positive, the SM capacitor discharges. On the contrary, the SM capacitor charges when the arm current is negative. When S1 and S3 or S2 and S4 are turned on, the output voltage of SM equals 0, while the SM capacitor voltage stays unchanged. The charging and discharging characteristics of SMs are displayed in Table 1 and Table 2.

2.2. Steady-State Operation

Take phase a as an example, as shown in Figure 1a, the bridge arm currents ipa and ina can be expressed as follows [29,30,31]:
i p a = i c c a + i a 2 i n a = i c c a i a 2 ,
where icca is the circulating current in phase a, and it only flows between the upper and lower arms, which does not affect the AC-side output currents.
The arm voltages vpa and vna can be expressed as:
v p a = V d c 2 L d i p a d t v a v n a = V d c 2 L d i n a d t + v a ,
where vpa and vna are, respectively, the voltages produced by the inserted SMs, whose mathematical expressions are given by the following equations:
v p a = i = 1 N s p a i × v c p a i v n a = i = 1 N s n a i × v c n a i ,
where s is the switching function of SM.
Therefore, the DC-side and AC-side voltages can be shown as:
V d c = v p a + v n a + 2 L d i c c a d t v a = v n a v p a 2 L d i a d t ,
From Equation (4), it can be seen that the circulating current icca can be adjusted by controlling the sum of the voltages on the upper and lower arms and that the AC-side currents can be controlled by the difference between the upper and lower arm voltages.
Generally, the ideal output voltage can be expressed as:
v a = m cos ( ω 0 t + ϕ ) V d c 2 ,
where m (0 ≤ m ≤ 1) represents the modulation ratio, ω0 is the angular speed, and φ is the initial phase angle.
According to Equations (4) and (5), by neglecting the voltage drop on the arm inductor, the ideal voltages of the upper and lower bridge arms can be derived as shown below.
v p a = ( 1 m cos ( ω 0 t + ϕ ) ) V d c 2 v n a = ( 1 + m cos ( ω 0 t + ϕ ) ) V d c 2

3. Fault Detection, Fault Localization, and Fault-Tolerant Operation

This section mainly concentrates on analyzing the fault detection, fault localization, and fault-tolerant operation of an MMC under the circumstance of IGBT open-circuit fault. Firstly, the output characteristics of SMs under IGBT open-circuit faults are analyzed. Then, a fault detection method based on the circulating current and output current observation is proposed. Since the fault detection method can only reveal which arm includes the faulty SM, it is necessary to develop a fault localization scheme to find the faulty SM. Once the faulty SM is found, it will be cut off, and the fault-tolerant operation method based on the hot redundant mode 2 is employed to ensure the continuous operation of the MMC.

3.1. Steady-State Operation

As shown in Figure 2, the IGBT open-circuit fault is likely to happen in switch S1 or S2 of the half-bridge SM. For the first case, S1 is turned on and S2 is turned off. When the bridge arm current is positive, the capacitor can only be charged by the bridge arm currents through the parallel diodes if the open-circuit fault occurs in S1. When the arm current is negative, it will flow through the parallel diode of S2 (if S1 is open circuited) and the capacitor voltage remains the same. For the second case that S1 is turned off and S2 is turned on, the arm current flows through S2 and the capacitor voltage stays unchanged. Therefore, when the open-circuit fault occurs in switch S1, the SM capacitor has only the charging period, leading to the continuous increase of the capacitor voltage. When S2 is open circuited, the capacitor will be discharged by the arm current when S1 is turned on and S2 is turned off. However, if the switching command reverses, where S1 is turned off and S2 is turned on, the current through the parallel diode will charge the capacitor when the arm current is positive. On the other hand, when the arm current is negative, it will flow through the parallel diode of S2, which makes the capacitor voltage remain at the original value. Therefore, when the open-circuit fault happens in switch S2, although the charging period of the SM capacitor is prolonged, the discharging period still exists.
From the point of view of the SM output voltage, it is equal to zero when S1 is with the open-circuit fault and the arm current is negative instead of Vc in the normal condition, meaning that the arm voltage correspondingly decreases. When S2 is open circuited and the arm current is positive, the output voltage of SM is Vc instead of zero in the normal condition, which means that the arm voltage correspondingly increases. In the next section, a fault detection scheme will be presented according to the output characteristics of the faulty SMs discussed above. For the sake of analysis and looking up, the output characteristics of the faulty SM are summarized in Table 3.

3.2. Fault Detection

According to the above analysis, once the IGBT open circuit occurs in an SM, the capacitor voltage and arm voltage will vary respectively. When the open-circuit fault happens in S1, only the charging period exists in the faulty SM and the capacitor voltage keeps increasing rapidly. When S2 is open circuited, the charging period of the faulty SM is extended and the capacitor voltage increases correspondingly. Additionally, when S1 is open circuited, the arm voltage decreases; on the contrary, when S2 is open circuited, the arm voltage increases. Based on the above characteristics, changing the voltage sensor position or adding an extra voltage sensor can directly detect the fault but with the added cost. The other solution is to indirectly observe the arm current and output current changes to detect the fault according to relationships among the arm voltage, arm current, and output current.
By rewriting Equation (4), the following equation can be obtained:
d i c c a d t = ( V d c ( v p a + v n a ) ) / 2 L d i a d t = ( v n a v p a 2 v a ) / L
From Equation (7), it can be seen that when the upper arm voltage vpa decreases, the circulating current icca increases swiftly and the capacitor voltage in the upper arm increases with a fast pace accordingly. Simultaneously, the output current ia increases. On the other hand, when the voltage in the upper arm vpa increases, the circulating current icca and the capacitor voltage decrease rapidly, and the decrease in the output current ia is also presented. In a similar way, when the voltage in the lower arm vna decreases, the circulating current icca and the capacitor voltage in the lower arm increases rapidly, while the output current ia decreases. When vna increases, icca and the capacitor voltage rapidly decrease, while the output current ia increases. Therefore, according to the analysis above and the corresponding relationships among the IGBT open circuit fault types, the circulating current, SM capacitor voltage, and the output current can be derived as shown in Table 4.

3.3. Fault Localization

By using the detection approach based on the circulating current and output current observation, the faulty arm with the faulty SM can be identified, but the exact location of the faulty SM cannot be obtained. In the conventional fault localization method, a maximum threshold for the capacitor voltage is set; when the faulty SM’s capacitor voltage reaches the set threshold, the faulty SM is located. This method has two drawbacks. Firstly, it has an inevitable and unpredictable delay time to wait for the capacitor voltage increase. Secondly, it is hard to discriminate the faulty SM from the healthy SMs when all SMs’ capacitor voltages simultaneously increase, which happens in the condition of the MMC employing carrier lamination modulation with a sorting-selection algorithm. To solve this issue, in this paper, a fault localization strategy based on the capacitor voltage difference observation is proposed.
According to Table 3, when the open circuit fault occurs in S1 and the arm current is negative, the capacitor voltage remains unchanged. However, in the normal case, the capacitor voltage decreases. Similarly, when S2 is open circuited and the arm current is positive, the capacitor voltage increases. While in the normal case, the capacitor voltage does not change. Therefore, the capacitor voltage in the faulty SM is larger than that in the normal SM in the same arm. Based on this point, the location of the faulty SM can be derived by measuring and comparing the capacitor voltages of the SMs in the same arm. Compared with the traditional threshold detection scheme, the proposed one extensively shortens the time for positioning and it minimizes the negative effects produced by the faulty SMs on the whole system.

3.4. Fault-Tolerant Operation

Once the faulty SM is located, the corresponding bypass switch is activated to cut off the faulty SM. In the control strategy, the faulty SM’s capacitor voltage is also removed from the pre-sorting sequence so as to ensure the faulty SM cannot be selected and that the other healthy SMs are sorted and selected based on the capacitor voltages and arm current directions. In this way, the fault-tolerant operation of the MMC can be realized after the cutting of the faulty SM.
As shown in Figure 3, assuming five normal SMs and a redundant SM exist in each arm, under normal conditions, the capacitor voltages of the six SMs are sequenced by the sorting algorithm at first, and the number of SMs to be inserted is derived from the carrier lamination modulation (in Figure 3, the number of inserted SMs is 4). When the arm current is positive, the selection process starts from the SM with the lowest capacitor voltage. When the arm current is negative, the selection process starts from the SM with the highest capacitor voltage. In the case that the fault occurs in SM2, after it is detected, localized, and bypassed by the above-mentioned method, the capacitor voltage of SM2 will also be removed from the pre-sorting sequence, and the remaining five healthy SMs are sequenced by the sorting algorithm, as shown in Figure 3b. From the above analysis, it can be seen that the faulty SM is automatically cut off in the modified sorting-selection algorithm, and the required SMs can be selected from the remaining healthy SMs and the redundant SM. The seamlessly continuous operation of the MMC can be ensured as long as the number of redundant SMs is larger than that of the faulty SMs.

4. Simulation Verification

To validate the proposed control strategy, an MMC system with five normal SMs and one redundant SM in each arm was established in Matlab/Simulink, operating as an inverter with a resistive load, as shown in Figure 4. The main electrical parameters are listed as shown below: the rated power is 900 kW, the DC-bus voltage is 6 kV, the output phase voltage is 2 kV (RMS value), the arm inductance is 10 mH, the SM capacitor voltage is 1.2 kV, the SM capacitance is 2.2 mF, the sampling frequency is 10 kHz, and the switching frequency is 5 kHz. The converter operates in the open-loop inverter mode and the common circulating current control strategy is used to eliminate the second-order circulating current component [32]. Additionally, the modified sorting-selection algorithm is adopted for the SM capacitor voltage balance. The control block diagram of the whole control system is displayed in Figure 5.
The simulation results of the normal operation are shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that, since the second-order circulating current elimination module is applied, the main part of the circulating current is the DC component. The output voltages are three-phase sinusoidal waveforms with low harmonic distortions.
Figure 7 shows the waveforms of the output voltages, output currents, circulating current, arm current, and capacitor voltage when the IGBT open circuit fault occurs in SMs at different positions. An IGBT open circuit fault is applied on the switch S1 in the SM of the upper arm of phase B at 0.4 s. According to the analysis in Table 4, the fault would increase the circulating current in phase B, which is demonstrated by Figure 7a. Besides, since the circulating current increases, the negative interval of the arm current decreases, resulting in all the capacitor voltages of SMs in the upper arm of phase B to increase simultaneously. Thus, the conventional fault localization method based on the maximum voltage threshold would find it hard to localize the faulty SM. When the fault point is in switch S2 in the SM of the upper arm of phase B, the circulating current in this phase would decrease swiftly, following the analysis in Table 4. As shown in Figure 7c,d, the results match the above analysis. At the same time, the output voltages and currents of phase B also decrease sharply, which can be explained by the fact that the increase of the upper arm voltage caused by the fault would result in the circulating current decrease and output voltage decrease, derived from Equation (4). The capacitor voltages increase with different slopes. It can be predicted that the fault SM localization requires considerable time to wait for the capacitor voltage to reach the threshold. When the switch S1 in the SM in the lower bridge arm is open circuited, the lower arm voltage decreases, which leads to the rapid boosting of the circulating current in phase B. Meanwhile, the capacitor voltages of the SMs in the lower bridge arm of phase B also increase simultaneously due to the increase of the circulating current. The results shown in Figure 7e,f are in line with the analysis. When the fault occurs in switch S2 in the SM in the lower bridge arm of phase B, a sharp decrease in the circulating current of phase B can be seen, as shown in Figure 7g,h, which is caused by the increase of the lower arm voltage in phase B. Additionally, the output voltages and currents of the phase decrease as well. The simulation results are in accordance with the results of the analysis in Table 4.
Figure 8 shows the performance of the proposed fault localization method based on the capacitor voltage difference observation. Under the scenario in Figure 8a, all SMs’ capacitor voltages increase simultaneously, which makes it hard to discriminate the faulty SM using the conventional methods with the fixed threshold detection. Under the scenario in Figure 8b, although the increase-slope of the capacitor voltage of the faulty SM is larger than that of the other SMs, the fault localization speed is heavily related to the fixed threshold, which should be much larger than the nominal voltage value for safety considerations. The results in Figure 8 demonstrate that the proposed fault localization method based on the capacitor voltage difference observation can locate the faulty SM. Although the localization time is related to different converter operation conditions and the set similarity ratio, the proposed method is faster than the conventional localization method, and the localization time is within 100 ms, under the condition of a simulation system.
Figure 9 shows the simulation results of the fault-tolerant operation of the MMC. An IGBT open circuit fault is applied on switch S1 in SM4 in the upper bridge arm of phase B, the faulty SM can be found and cut off by the fault localization module at 0.46 s. As shown on the red line in Figure 9b, when the faulty SM is cut off, the capacitor voltage is stable with a slight discharge, and the other healthy SMs’ capacitor voltages decrease to the nominal value. The system returns to the normal operation state within 120 ms. When the open circuit fault occurs in switch S2 in SM4 in the upper bridge arm of phase B, the faulty SM can be found and cut off by the fault localization module at 0.42 s, and then the faulty SM is bypassed and the capacitor voltage is stable with a slight discharge, as shown by the red line in Figure 9d. The system returns to the normal operational mode within 100 ms. From the simulation results, it can be seen that the fault detection, fault localization, and the fault-tolerant operation strategies can be used to swiftly detect, locate, and cut off the IGBT open-circuit fault in SMs, leading to the system returning to normal operation conditions immediately.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a comprehensive analysis of the fault detection, fault localization, and fault-tolerant operation of MMCs under the circumstance of an IGBT open circuit fault was presented. According to the operation principle of MMCs and the output characteristics of the SM with an IGBT open circuit fault, a fault detection method based on the circulating current and output current observation was used to detect the fault time and the faulty phase. To precisely locate and bypass the faulty SM, a fault localization method based on the capacitor voltage difference observation has been proposed. Focusing on the issues of the conventional fault localization method based on the set threshold, the proposed method is based on the different charging and discharging behaviors between the faulty SM and the healthy SM. By measuring and comparing the capacitor voltages, the faulty SM can be located. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed fault localization method can efficiently locate the faulty SM, under two specific conditions: (1) all SM capacitor voltages in the faulty arm increase simultaneously; (2) the SM capacitor voltages in the faulty arm increase with different slopes, where the conventional fault localization method finds it hard to work properly. After the faulty SM is located and cut off, the fault-tolerant operation strategy based on the use of redundant SMs was employed. The simulation results cater to the theoretical analysis, and the feasibility and effectiveness of the adopted method were also validated.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources under Grant LAPS17022.

Author Contributions

Wei Li wrote the paper and did the simulations; Gengyin Li supervised the first author in writing the paper; Rong Zeng provided technical support for the paper; Kai Ni modified the English writing of the paper; Yihua Hu and Huiqing Wen checked the logic of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lesnicar, A.; Marquardt, R. An innovative modular multilevel converter topology suitable for a wide power range. In Proceedings of the IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference, Bologna, Italy, 23–26 June 2003; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Marquardt, R. Modular Multilevel Converter: An universal concept for HVDC-Networks and extended DC-Bus-applications. In Proceedings of the International Power Electronics Conference, Sapporo, Japan, 21–24 June 2010; pp. 502–507. [Google Scholar]
  3. Saeedifard, M.; Iravani, R. Dynamic performance of a modular multilevel back-to-back HVDC system. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2010, 25, 2903–2912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, W.; Xu, D.; Enjeti, P.N.; Li, H.; Hawke, J.T.; Krishnamoorthy, H.S. Survey on fault-tolerant techniques for power electronic converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 6319–6331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guan, M.; Xu, Z. Modeling and control of a modular multilevel converter-based HVDC system under unbalanced grid conditions. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2012, 27, 4858–4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tu, Q.R.; Xu, Z.; Chang, Y.; Guan, L. Suppressing DC voltage ripples of MMC-HVDC under unbalanced grid conditions. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2012, 27, 1332–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moon, J.W.; Kim, C.S.; Park, J.W.; Kang, D.W.; Kim, J.M. Circulating current control in MMC under the unbalanced voltage. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2013, 28, 1952–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, Y.B.; Jiang, D.Z.; Guo, J.; Hu, P.F.; Liang, Y.Q. Analysis and control of modular multilevel converters under unbalanced conditions. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2013, 28, 1986–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zeng, R.; Xu, L.; Yao, L.Z.; Williams, B.W. Design and operation of a hybrid modular multilevel converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 1137–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tang, L.X.; Ooi, B.T. Locating and isolating DC faults in multi-terminal DC systems. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2007, 22, 1877–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, J.; Fletcher, J.E.; Reily, J.O. Short-circuit and ground fault analyses and location in VSC-based DC network cables. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2012, 59, 3827–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, X.Q.; Song, Q.; Liu, W.H.; Rao, H.; Xu, S.K.; Li, L.C. Protection of nonpermanent faults on DC overhead lines in MMC-based HVDC systems. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2013, 28, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shao, S.; Wheeler, P.; Clare, J.; Watson, A. Fault detection for modular multilevel converters based on sliding mode observer. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 28, 4867–4872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shao, S.; Wheeler, P.W.; Clare, J.C.; Watson, A.J. Open-circuit fault detection and isolation for modular multilevel converter based on sliding mode observer. In Proceedings of the 2013 15th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE), Lille, France, 2–6 September 2013; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shao, S.; Clare, J.C.; Watson, A.J.; Wheeler, P.W. Detection and isolation of multiple faults in a modular multilevel converter based on a sliding mode observer. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 14–18 September 2014; pp. 3491–3495. [Google Scholar]
  16. Deng, F.; Chen, Z.; Khan, M.R.; Zhu, R. Fault Detection and Localization Method for Modular Multilevel Converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 2721–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, B.B.; Shi, S.L.; Wang, B.; Wang, G.L.; Wang, W.; Xu, D.G. Fault diagnosis and tolerant control of single IGBT open-circuit failure in modular multilevel converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2016, 31, 3165–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shao, S.; Watson, A.J.; Clare, J.C.; Wheeler, P.W. Robustness analysis and experimental validation of a fault detection and isolation method for modular multilevel converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2016, 31, 3794–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, H.; Ma, K.; Loh, P.C.; Blaabjerg, F. Online fault identification based on an adaptive observer for modular multilevel converters applied to wind power generation systems. Energies 2015, 8, 7140–7160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, X.; Zhang, J.; Xu, S.; Jiang, Y. Fault diagnosis of modular multilevel converters based on extended state observer. In Proceedings of the Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 27–30 June 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yang, Q.; Qin, J.; Saeedifard, M. Analysis, detection, and location of open-switch submodule failures in a modular multilevel converter. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2016, 31, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Picas, R.; Zaragoza, J.; Pou, J.; Ceballos, S. Reliable modular multilevel converter fault detection with redundant voltage sensor. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 32, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Haghnazari, S.; Khodabandeh, M.; Zolghadri, M.R. Fast fault detection method for modular multilevel converter semiconductor power switches. IET Power Electron. 2016, 9, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, S.; Tang, Y.; Wang, P. Open-circuit fault diagnosis of switching devices in a modular multilevel converter with distributed control. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1–5 October 2017; pp. 4208–4214. [Google Scholar]
  25. Son, G.T.; Lee, H.J.; Nam, T.S.; Chung, Y.H.; Lee, U.H.; Baek, S.T.; Hur, K.; Park, J.W. Design and control of a modular multilevel HVDC converter with redundant power modules for noninterruptible energy transfer. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2012, 27, 1611–1619. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, R.; Xu, R.; Xu, D.; Wang, W. Seamless transition control for modular multilevel converters when inserting a cold-reserve redundant submodule. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 4052–4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, P.; Jiang, D.; Zhou, Y.; Liang, Y.; Guo, J.; Lin, Z. Energy-balancing control strategy for modular multilevel converters under submodule fault conditions. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 5021–5030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deng, F.J.; Tian, Y.J.; Zhu, R.W.; Chen, Z. Fault-tolerant approach for modular multilevel converters under submodule faults. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2016, 63, 7235–7263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ilves, K.; Antonopoulos, A.; Norrga, S.; Nee, H. Steady-state analysis of interaction between harmonic components of arm and line quantities of modular multilevel converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2012, 27, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Song, Q.; Liu, W.H.; Li, Z.Q.; Rao, H.; Xu, S.K.; Li, L.C. A steady-state analysis method for a modular multilevel converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 28, 3702–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Harnefors, L.; Antonopoulos, A.; Norrga, S.; Angquist, L.; Nee, H.P. Dynamic analysis of modular multilevel converters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2013, 60, 2526–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tu, Q.R.; Xu, Z.; Xu, L. Reduced switching-frequency modulation and circulating current suppression for modular multilevel converters. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2011, 26, 2009–2017. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The modular multi-level converter structure diagram. (a) Modular multilevel converter (MMC) topology; (b) Half-bridge sub-module; and (c) Full-bridge submodule.
Figure 1. The modular multi-level converter structure diagram. (a) Modular multilevel converter (MMC) topology; (b) Half-bridge sub-module; and (c) Full-bridge submodule.
Energies 11 00837 g001
Figure 2. The charging and discharging current circuit of the fault submodule.
Figure 2. The charging and discharging current circuit of the fault submodule.
Energies 11 00837 g002
Figure 3. The improved sorting algorithm. (a) Normal operation; (b) Fault-tolerant operation.
Figure 3. The improved sorting algorithm. (a) Normal operation; (b) Fault-tolerant operation.
Energies 11 00837 g003
Figure 4. The simulation model.
Figure 4. The simulation model.
Energies 11 00837 g004
Figure 5. The control system block diagram.
Figure 5. The control system block diagram.
Energies 11 00837 g005
Figure 6. The normal operation mode.
Figure 6. The normal operation mode.
Energies 11 00837 g006
Figure 7. The output voltage, output current, circulation, bridge arm current, and capacitor voltage of an IGBT with an open circuit fault. (a) The output voltage, current, and circulation of the B phase upper bridge arm module S1; (b) The sub-module capacitance voltage and bridge arm current of the B phase upper bridge arm module with an S1 open circuit; (c) The output voltage, current, and circulation of the B phase upper bridge arm module with an S2 open circuit fault; (d) The sub-module capacitance voltage and bridge arm current of the B phase upper bridge arm module with an S2 open circuit fault; (e) The output voltage, current, and circulation of the B phrase lower bridge arm sub-module with an S1 open circuit fault; (f) The sub-module capacitance voltage and bridge arm current of the B phase lower bridge arm module with an S1 open circuit fault; (g) The output voltage, current, and circulation of the B phase lower bridge arm module with an S2 open circuit fault; (h) The capacitance voltage and the bridge arm current of the B phase lower bridge arm module with an S2 open circuit fault.
Figure 7. The output voltage, output current, circulation, bridge arm current, and capacitor voltage of an IGBT with an open circuit fault. (a) The output voltage, current, and circulation of the B phase upper bridge arm module S1; (b) The sub-module capacitance voltage and bridge arm current of the B phase upper bridge arm module with an S1 open circuit; (c) The output voltage, current, and circulation of the B phase upper bridge arm module with an S2 open circuit fault; (d) The sub-module capacitance voltage and bridge arm current of the B phase upper bridge arm module with an S2 open circuit fault; (e) The output voltage, current, and circulation of the B phrase lower bridge arm sub-module with an S1 open circuit fault; (f) The sub-module capacitance voltage and bridge arm current of the B phase lower bridge arm module with an S1 open circuit fault; (g) The output voltage, current, and circulation of the B phase lower bridge arm module with an S2 open circuit fault; (h) The capacitance voltage and the bridge arm current of the B phase lower bridge arm module with an S2 open circuit fault.
Energies 11 00837 g007aEnergies 11 00837 g007bEnergies 11 00837 g007cEnergies 11 00837 g007d
Figure 8. The fault localization module test. (a) The fault localization of the B phase upper bridge arm module with an S1 open circuit fault; (b) The fault localization of the B phase upper bridge arm module with an S2 open circuit fault.
Figure 8. The fault localization module test. (a) The fault localization of the B phase upper bridge arm module with an S1 open circuit fault; (b) The fault localization of the B phase upper bridge arm module with an S2 open circuit fault.
Energies 11 00837 g008aEnergies 11 00837 g008b
Figure 9. The fault-tolerant operation. (a) The output voltage, current, and circulation of the B phase upper bridge arm sub-module 4 with an S1 open circuit fault; (b) The capacitance voltage and bridge arm current of the B phase upper bridge arm sub-module 4 with an S1 open circuit fault; (c) The sub-module output voltage, current ,and circulation of the B phase upper bridge arm sub-module 4 with an S2 open circuit fault; (d) The sub-module capacitance voltage and bridge arm current of the B phase upper bridge arm sub-module 4 with an S2 open circuit fault.
Figure 9. The fault-tolerant operation. (a) The output voltage, current, and circulation of the B phase upper bridge arm sub-module 4 with an S1 open circuit fault; (b) The capacitance voltage and bridge arm current of the B phase upper bridge arm sub-module 4 with an S1 open circuit fault; (c) The sub-module output voltage, current ,and circulation of the B phase upper bridge arm sub-module 4 with an S2 open circuit fault; (d) The sub-module capacitance voltage and bridge arm current of the B phase upper bridge arm sub-module 4 with an S2 open circuit fault.
Energies 11 00837 g009aEnergies 11 00837 g009bEnergies 11 00837 g009c
Table 1. The charging and discharging characteristics of the half-bridge submodule.
Table 1. The charging and discharging characteristics of the half-bridge submodule.
StateSwitch S1Switch S2Output Voltage vsmCapacitor Voltage Vc
110VcCharging (iarm > 0)
Discharging (iarm < 0)
2010Unchanged
Table 2. The charging and discharging characteristics of the full-bridge submodule.
Table 2. The charging and discharging characteristics of the full-bridge submodule.
StateSwitch S1Switch S2Switch S3Switch S4Output Voltage vsmCapacitor Voltage Vc
11001VcCharging (iarm > 0)
Discharging (iarm < 0)
201010Unchanged
310100Unchanged
40110VcCharging (iarm < 0)
Discharging (iarm > 0)
Table 3. The output characteristics of the fault submodule.
Table 3. The output characteristics of the fault submodule.
State of SMiarm > 0iarm < 0
Switching Command
S1 = 1; S2 = 0
Switching Command
S1 = 0; S2 = 1
Switching Command
S1 = 1; S2 = 0
Switching Command
S1 = 0; S2 = 1
S1 Open Circuitvsm = vc
Charging the Capacitor
vsm = 0
Capacitor Voltage Unchanged
vsm = 0
Capacitor Voltage Unchanged
vsm = 0
Capacitor Voltage Unchanged
Normal Statevsm = vc
Charging the Capacitor
vsm = 0
Capacitor Voltage Unchanged
vsm = vc
Discharging the Capacitor
vsm = 0
Capacitor Voltage Unchanged
S2 Open Circuitvsm = vc
Charging the Capacitor
vsm = vc
Charging the Capacitor
vsm = vc
Discharging the Capacitor
vsm = 0
Capacitor Voltage Unchanged
Table 4. The relationship between the opening fault type and the circulation and the output current change.
Table 4. The relationship between the opening fault type and the circulation and the output current change.
Open Circuit Fault TypeCirculating CurrentCapacitor Voltage in the SMOutput Current
Open circuit of S1 in the upper bridge armIncreaseIncreaseIncrease
Open circuit of S2 in the upper bridge armDecreaseDecreaseDecrease
Open circuit of S1 in the lower bridge armIncreaseIncreaseDecrease
Open circuit of S2 in the lower bridge armDecreaseDecreaseIncrease

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.; Li, G.; Zeng, R.; Ni, K.; Hu, Y.; Wen, H. The Fault Detection, Localization, and Tolerant Operation of Modular Multilevel Converters with an Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) Open Circuit Fault. Energies 2018, 11, 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040837

AMA Style

Li W, Li G, Zeng R, Ni K, Hu Y, Wen H. The Fault Detection, Localization, and Tolerant Operation of Modular Multilevel Converters with an Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) Open Circuit Fault. Energies. 2018; 11(4):837. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040837

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Wei, Gengyin Li, Rong Zeng, Kai Ni, Yihua Hu, and Huiqing Wen. 2018. "The Fault Detection, Localization, and Tolerant Operation of Modular Multilevel Converters with an Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) Open Circuit Fault" Energies 11, no. 4: 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040837

APA Style

Li, W., Li, G., Zeng, R., Ni, K., Hu, Y., & Wen, H. (2018). The Fault Detection, Localization, and Tolerant Operation of Modular Multilevel Converters with an Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) Open Circuit Fault. Energies, 11(4), 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040837

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop