Next Article in Journal
Arsenic in Surface Soils Affected by Mining and Metallurgical Processing in K. Mitrovica Region, Kosovo
Next Article in Special Issue
Playing It Safe: Assessing Cumulative Impact and Social Vulnerability through an Environmental Justice Screening Method in the South Coast Air Basin, California
Previous Article in Journal
Liquid-Diet with Alcohol Alters Maternal, Fetal and Placental Weights and the Expression of Molecules Involved in Integrin Signaling in the Fetal Cerebral Cortex
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7(11), 4037-4049; doi:10.3390/ijerph7114037

The Role of Cumulative Risk Assessment in Decisions about Environmental Justice

1
Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Brownsville Regional Campus, 80 Fort Brown, Brownsville, TX 78520, USA
2
Institute for Health Policy, University of Texas School of Public Health, 1200 Herman zressler, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 October 2010 / Revised: 29 October 2010 / Accepted: 17 November 2010 / Published: 18 November 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Environmental Justice)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [367 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]   |  

Abstract

There is strong presumptive evidence that people living in poverty and certain racial and ethnic groups bear a disproportionate burden of environmental health risk. Many have argued that conducting formal assessments of the health risk experienced by affected communities is both unnecessary and counterproductive—that instead of analyzing the situation our efforts should be devoted to fixing obvious problems and rectifying observable wrongs. We contend that formal assessment of cumulative health risks from combined effects of chemical and nonchemical stressors is a valuable tool to aid decision makers in choosing risk management options that are effective, efficient, and equitable. If used properly, cumulative risk assessment need not impair decision makers’ discretion, nor should it be used as an excuse for doing nothing in the face of evident harm. Good policy decisions require more than good intentions; they necessitate analysis of risk-related information along with careful consideration of economic issues, ethical and moral principles, legal precedents, political realities, cultural beliefs, societal values, and bureaucratic impediments. Cumulative risk assessment can provide a systematic and impartial means for informing policy decisions about environmental justice. View Full-Text
Keywords: cumulative risk assessment; environmental justice; health disparities; risk assessment; susceptible groups; vulnerable populations cumulative risk assessment; environmental justice; health disparities; risk assessment; susceptible groups; vulnerable populations
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sexton, K.; Linder, S.H. The Role of Cumulative Risk Assessment in Decisions about Environmental Justice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 4037-4049.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top