Next Article in Journal
Effects of Problem-Based Learning on the Problem-Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy of Students Majoring in Dental Hygiene
Next Article in Special Issue
Predictors for E-Government Adoption of SANAD App Services Integrating UTAUT, TPB, TAM, Trust, and Perceived Risk
Previous Article in Journal
Student Perceptions of Age and Ageing—An Evaluation of Swiss Dental Students Receiving Education in Gerodontology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Understanding Patient Needs Regarding Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Smartphone Applications: A Qualitative Insight from Saudi Arabia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 12
10.3390/ijerph19127486
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Prevalence, Features and Degree of Association of Oral Lesions in COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

by
Federica Di Spirito
*,
Alfredo Iandolo
,
Alessandra Amato
,
Mario Caggiano
,
Annunziata Raimondo
,
Serena Lembo
and
Stefano Martina
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(12), 7486; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127486
Submission received: 26 May 2022 / Revised: 15 June 2022 / Accepted: 16 June 2022 / Published: 18 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Care and Health Services Digital Revolution)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Regardless of rapidly emerging findings on oral lesions described in adult SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects, the evidence level remains quite low and rather contrasting; therefore, the present systematic review of systematic reviews primarily aims to point out the overall prevalence of diagnosed cases. Secondary aims are to estimate the degree of association between oral lesions and SARS-CoV-2 infection and to grade, based on the reported frequency, the primary oral lesions, with related clinical presentations and microscopic features, in relation to COVID-19 forms. A study protocol compliant with the PRISMA statement was developed. Twelve studies were included, reporting highly heterogeneous and incomplete findings, thus precluding a meta-analysis. Further studies should be conducted to assess the overall prevalence of cases diagnosed with oral lesions among adult SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects, especially considering novel viral variants, and to determine their degree of association with SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 forms. Moreover, the reported findings noticed the need to evaluate the putative role both of SARS-CoV-2 in oral lesions genesis and of periodontitis and periodontal microbiome in COVID-19 worsening and re-activations. Deeper insights into oral lesions in adult SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects could enhance the comprehension of illness pathogenesis, natural history and clinical presentation, thus improving the preparedness of health professionals in the inter-disciplinary management of COVID-19.

1. Introduction

The most common manifestations of COVID-19 comprise asthenia, headache, fever, hyposmia, oropharyngeal inflammation, dysgeusia, dry cough, dyspnea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea [1,2]. Further enriching the compound clinical presentation of the disease, muco-cutaneous manifestations, resembling varicella and measles rushes, as well as Erythema Multiforme lesions, urticaria and petechiae [3,4] have also been reported in SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects.
Such multi-system involvement characterizing COVID-19 may be attributable to the wide topographic distribution of the viral Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding receptor, mediating cell invasion, which has been detected in upper and lower respiratory apparatus; gastrointestinal tract, including oral epitheliocytes; exocrine glands, along with salivary ones; cardiovascular and genitourinary systems; skeletal muscles and skin [5,6,7]. Consistently, multiple case reports and series, as well as letters to the Editor and comments [8,9,10,11], have later described several lesions of the oral mucosa potentially ascribable to SARS-CoV-2 infection or observed in patients with COVID-19, clearly highlighting heterogeneous macroscopic features and uncertain prevalence.
Furthermore, regardless of rapidly emerging findings, the evidence level seems to remain quite low and rather contrasting; therefore, the present systematic review of systematic reviews primarily aims to synthesize, integrate and update currently available data on the overall prevalence of cases diagnosed with oral lesions among adult SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects. Secondary aims of the study are to estimate the degree of association between oral lesions and SARS-CoV-2 infection [12] and to grade, based on the reported frequency, the primary oral lesions, with related clinical presentations and microscopic features, in relation to COVID-19 forms [13].

2. Materials and Methods

The presently applied study protocol was developed before literature search and data analysis in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [14] focusing the research questions on: prevalence, clinical presentation and histopathology of oral lesions diagnosed in adult SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects [15].

2.1. Search Strategy

Systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis on oral lesions observed in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were electronically searched till 7 May 2022, across Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed and BioMed Central databases, using review, systematic reviews and no filters, respectively, as well as the PROSPERO register, by two independent reviewers (F.D.S. and A.I.), without language restrictions and using the following suitable key words, appropriately combined by Boolean operators:
  • COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 OR Coronavirus disease 2019 OR novel coronavirus
  • AND oral lesions OR oral manifestations OR oral signs
  • AND Systematic review OR meta-analysis.

2.2. Study Selection and Eligibility Criteria

The collected citations were recorded; then, the duplicates were eliminated, and the obtained titles and abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers (F.D.S. and A.I.). The fulltexts of potentially relevant papers and ambiguous abstracts were independently reviewed by the same authors (F.D.S. and A.I.), who solved disagreements through discussion and consensus, by involving a third author (S.M.) if necessary. An additional manual search for systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis was also conducted on the reference list of eligible articles; pertinent titles and abstract were screened, and the fulltexts were reviewed as already described. The contacting of study authors was conducted in case of missing fulltexts.
No restrictions were applied during literature search concerning: status, date, language of the publications; study design; sample size, comorbidities and COVID-19 severity of the investigated population. The exclusion criteria were: participants aged < 18 years old; normal variations [16]; likely pre-existing and self-reported lesions of the oral mucosa; oral lesions following COVID-19 vaccination; smell and taste dysfunction.

2.3. Data Extraction

Data were independently extracted on a standardized data extraction form by two reviewers (F.D.S. and S.M.), who reached consensus by discussion, also involving a third author (A.I.) if needed.
From each of the systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis included in the present study, the following data meeting eligibility criteria were recorded, when available: first author, year, journal, date of publication, funding, quality of the systematic reviews included in the present study; design and number of reported studies; sample size, gender ratio, mean age and COVID-19 ongoing treatment and severity, classified as mild/moderate or severe/hospitalized, as per Amorim Dos Santos et al. [17], of the investigated population; total number or prevalence of subjects diagnosed with oral lesions and defined as “cases”; clinical presentation and microscopic features of the oral lesions described.

2.4. Quality Assessment and Data Synthesis

The Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool [18], accessed online (https://amstar.ca) on 14 May 2022, the assessment of the quality of the systematic reviews of both randomized and/or non-randomized studies included in the present study was employed.

2.5. Synthesis Methods

Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 25.0; Armonk, NY, USA Microsoft Excel software 2019; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

In total, 351 potentially relevant titles/abstract of systematic reviews were obtained from the electronic search, 15 of which were from MEDLINE/PubMed, 12 from Scopus and 322 from the BioMed Central database, along with 2 from the PROSPERO register. A total of 14 duplicates were removed along with 1 ongoing not-published review from the PROSPERO register. After title/abstract screening, three records, one evaluating the risk of virus contamination during minimally invasive surgery [19], one limiting the investigation to oral manifestations in children [20] and one reporting lesions observed following COVID-19 vaccination [21], were excluded. Finally, 12 studies [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33] compliant with the eligibility criteria were included in the present systematic review of systematic reviews.
The study-selection flowchart is illustrated in Figure 1.

3.2. Studies’ Characteristics and Qualitative Synthesis

Out of the twelve systematic reviews included in the present study, detailed in Table 1, all resulted to have been published in the English language between 11 September 2020 and 27 April 2022; the full texts were all available, and two authors [30,32] declared funding. Two systematic reviews exclusively comprised case reports and case series [27,32], with one also including letters to the Editor and comments [33], whilst the remaining nine [22,23,24,25,26,28,29,30,31] also considered observational cross-sectional and/or retrospective and/or prospective studies. Three systematic reviews included a meta-analysis [23,28,30], and all resulted to be of a critically low quality, except for Doceda et al.’s [26], Nijakowski et al.’s [28] and Orilisi et al.’s [29] studies, characterized by low quality, as per the AMSTAR2 tool assessment.
In compliance with the eligibility criteria, the data reported in a total of 176 studies, 65 observational studies and 108 case reports, as well as case series, letters to the Editor and comments, included in the presently considered systematic reviews were extracted and recorded.
The findings from a total of 11,717 SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects ≥ 18 years old were obtained. The mean age of the investigated population was retrieved or presently computed by reported data from six systematic reviews [22,24,28,29,32,33], generally involving a population of 3288 subjects, between 40.5 and 56.6 years old, with a mean of 50.0 years of age (8429 study participants without reported age). The gender ratio of the investigated population was specified in six studies [22,24,26,28,29,32], accounting for 4925 subjects, 3156 males and 1769 females (6792 study participants without reported gender). COVID-19 illness severity was defined, differentiating hospitalized and non-hospitalized subjects, in six systematic reviews [22,25,26,28,29,30]; in the systematic review conducted by Erbaş et al., 2022 [27], 76.1% of the overall population was declared to be hospitalized, but it was not definable from the reported findings if the involved subjects were ≥18 years old; therefore, such cases were not presently considered. Ongoing COVID-19 treatment, instead, was described in three studies [26,28,32], generally reporting the administration of paracetamol, dexamethasone, chloroquine, antibiotics and antivirals.
Among the SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects ≥ 18 years old considered in the twelve systematic reviews, 13.54% were diagnosed with oral lesions; the cases’ mean age and gender ratio could not be calculated due to the paucity of the reported data. Erosions and ulcers were reported in 48.96% of the cases, with no specific characteristics (38.24%) or described as aphthous-like (16.76%), erythema multiforme-like (1.89%) and herpetiform (1.07%), as illustrated in Figure 2. White plaques were found in 0.25% of cases with oral lesions, and no red plaques were recorded, while vesicles and bullae accounted for the 4.97% of the diagnosed cases (Figure 2). Maculae (12.47%) and petechiae (3.96%) altogether resulted to be described in 16.44% of the cases (Figure 2). Oral candidiasis (10.74%), lichenoid (4.63%) and hemorrhagic (2.73%) lesions, as well as necrotizing periodontal disease (1.64%) and desquamative gingivitis (0.90%), were also reported. The affected locations were defined in six systematic reviews [22,24,26,27,28,32], reporting a total of 546 cases, and the tongue was found to be the most frequently affected site (18.58%), followed by buccal and labial (13.73%) and palatal (2.70%) mucosa, gingiva (2.83%) and diffuse lesions (2.33%). Microscopic features were detailed for two cases in Amorim Dos Santos et al.’s [22] and for five cases in Silveira et al.’s [32] systematic reviews; two of the seven described cases were reported in both studies and all five histopathological findings concerned oral ulcers.

4. Discussion

A large body of evidence has described lesions of the oral mucosa, potentially ascribable to SARS-CoV-2 infection or observed in patients with COVID-19, clearly highlighting heterogeneous macroscopic features and uncertain prevalence [8,9,10,11]. Therefore, the present systematic review of systematic reviews aims, primarily, to point out the overall prevalence of cases diagnosed with oral lesions among adult SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects and to, secondarily, estimate the degree of association between oral lesions and SARS-CoV-2 infection [12] and grade, based on the reported frequency, the primary oral lesions, with related clinical presentations and microscopic features, in relation to COVID-19 forms [13].
Out of the twelve systematic reviews currently considered, none included trials, reliably not conducted at the time, and seven also comprised a total of 65 observational studies. All of the systematic reviews included in the present study analyzed data from cumulatively 108 case reports and series, letters to the Editor and comments that, despite the intrinsic low level of evidence, accurately describe both the oral features and systemic conditions of the cases.
Since data from studies included in the systematic reviews but not meeting eligibility criteria were not considered, findings concerning younger subjects were excluded from the current analysis. In addition, the average age of the cases diagnosed with oral lesions was only reported in six out of twelve systematic reviews [24,25,28,29,32,33], revealing a mean age of 50.0 and not allowing a complete computation. Similarly, since appropriate data could only be extracted from six out of twelve systematic reviews [22,24,26,28,29,32], showing a male–female ratio of 3156/1769, a precise estimate could not be carried out, not permitting a comparison with Nuno-Gonzalez et al.’s [34] results, pointing out a slightly higher prevalence of oral lesions in females potentially related to the influence of sex hormones on SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology [35]. Severely incomplete data were also found concerning COVID-19 severity in the investigated populations, currently classified as mild/moderate or severe/hospitalized, as per Amorim Dos Santos et al. [22]. Consequently, the degree of association of oral lesions with SARS-CoV-2 infection [12] could not be determinately estimated, and the primary lesions, with related clinical presentations and microscopic features, could not be definitively graded in relation to COVID-19 forms [13]. Similarly, largely deficient data were acquired concerning ongoing COVID-19 treatments, potentially responsible of oral adverse reactions. Indeed, oral lesions, enriching the multi-systemic phenomenology of the illness, have been hypothesized to be potentially ascribable to the direct cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2, with the viral invasion of the oral epitheliocytes, mediated by ACE2 receptors [5,6] or attributable to the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection; therefore, they could manifest as an indirect epiphenomenon of the immune–inflammatory reaction against viral antigens [36]. Moreover, the reported oral lesions were proposed to possibly represent the clinical expression of secondary immunity impairment and related co-infections, as well as adverse reactions to pharmacological therapies and iatrogenic injuries related to COVID-19 treatment [32,37,38].
However, regardless of the proposed pathogenesis of oral lesions occurring in COVID-19, which goes beyond the scope of the present study, the overall prevalence of cases diagnosed with oral lesions in SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects ≥ 18 years of age is still debated. Such prevalence may be very difficult to be determined and, conceivably, under-evaluated as a result of life-threatening conditions and supplementary breathing bias use in severe and critical COVID-19 patients, as well as domiciliary care in mild illness, beyond the particularly defensive personal protective equipment limiting photographic documentation. The total cases diagnosed with oral lesions accounted for 13.54% of the population analyzed in the twelve systematic reviews. Noteworthy, it may be hypothesized that the presently computed prevalence could be affected by the high number of case reports and series considered in the systematic reviews, thus potentially resulting overestimated, although Fidan et al.’s [39] and Elamrousi et al.’s [40] studies reported prevalence values as high as 65.5% and 90.3%. Such discrepancies may be explained by the exclusion from the present analysis of oral lesions self-diagnosed by means of questionnaires, which were included, instead, in Qui et al.’s review [30], of normal variations, such as fissured and geographic tongue, and of likely pre-existing conditions and diseases, principally represented by Oral Lichen Planus, which were also recorded (Table 1).
The retrieved findings revealed extremely heterogeneous denominations of primary oral lesions, probably referable to the fact that the cases were mainly diagnosed by internists, anesthesiologists and dermatologists, rather than oral medicine consultants and dentists, especially during the first peak of the pandemic and the related suspension of non-urgent care. Given these considerations, the authors categorized the reported primary oral lesions as aphthous-like and/or erythema multiforme-like and/or herpetiform erosions and ulcers, white and/or red plaques, and vesicles and bullae, attempting to reduce heterogeneity in reporting forms and suggesting the use of such common denominations in future research. In addition, a high frequency of cases with polymorphous and complex intra- and peri-oral macroscopic pictures clearly emerged, making extremely complex the identification of the underlying primary lesions (Table 1). However, the most frequently reported primary oral lesions resulted to be erosion and ulcers, found in 48.96% of diagnosed cases; in more detail, no specific characteristics were delineated for 38.24% of such lesions, while aphthous-like, herpetiform and erythema multiforme-like appearances were described in 16.76%, 1.89% and 1.07% of the overall erosions and ulcers recorded, respectively (Figure 2). Similarly, Fidan et al. [39] described erosions and ulcers as the most frequent primary oral lesions in SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects and estimated a prevalence of 39.7% of aphthous-like ones. Second for reported frequency were maculae (12.47%), mostly depicted as erythema, and petechiae (3.96%), representing 16.44% of the primary oral lesions, followed by vesicles and bullae, mainly diffuse, and plaques, exclusively white, accounting for 4.97% and 0.25% of the reported oral lesions (Figure 2). Such primary oral lesions could not be analyzed in relation to the most frequently affected intra-oral site due to the incompleteness of findings, although tongue, buccal and palatal mucosa, gingiva and lip resulted to be involved in a descending order, also in accordance with Iranmanesh et al. [37], representing the tongue and labial mucosa as the most common affected locations. Particularly relevant would have also been identifying the timing of the appearance of the described oral lesions, reported only by Orilisi et al. [29]; this has been previously proposed to be a potential indicator both of COVID-19 onset, as established for taste and smell alterations, and illness worsening [1,2,8,9,10,11]. Moreover, broadening the knowledge of the natural history of the disease, also including the expected timing of the appearance of oral lesions in COVID-19, may bring a two-fold effect: on one hand, it may aid in categorizing lesions into early ones, potentially attributable to the viral cytopathic effect, and late ones, detected after the start of therapy and potentially associated with it [41], while, on the other hand, it may improve oral and dental care provision planning, as part of the interdisciplinary management of patients with COVID-19.
At the current state of knowledge, since the histopathological features of oral mucosal lesions were only reported in few cases [17,32,41] diagnosed with oral erosions or ulcers by mostly describing similar non-specific pictures (Table 1), no definitive evidence on the microscopic appearance of the oral lesions most frequently observed in adult SARS-Cov-2-positive subjects has been achieved. However, the most commonly reported histopathological feature for such erosive and ulcerative oral lesions is the vacuolization of oral epithelial cells, which, similarly to the microscopic alterations observed in other infections by epitheliotropic viruses, including those belonging to the Herpesviridae family, could constitute the epiphenomenon of the direct cytopathic effect operated by SARS-CoV-2. The latter hypothesis would be validated by the contextual detection of the virus within oral epithelial layers by in situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry, which was conducted, at the current state of evidence, only by Soares et al. [42]. Necrotic phenomena, leukocytosis and Langerhans cell activation were also described within the oral epithelium [22,32,41]. In the underlying connective tissue, similar to cutaneous and pulmonary biopsies, multiple micro-thrombi with consequent partial or total occlusion of small-and medium-caliber vesselswere also described, along with massive inflammatory cell infiltration at peri-vascular and peri-glandular sites, as well as with a band-like lichenoid distribution, and reactive vascular hyperplasia and peri-vascular fibrosis [22,32,41].
In addition to primary oral lesions, desquamative gingivitis (0.63%), lichenoid (4.2%) and hemorrhagic (2.3%) lesions were also reported, as well as oral candidiasis (5.4%) and necrotizing periodontal disease (1.27%), probably attributable to immune impairment. Besides the periodontal necrotizing lesions, also those from chronic periodontitis were related to the COVID-19, and the most severe stages of periodontitis were associated with higher rates of hospitalization, need of ventilation and mortality [43]. The authors of this systematic review conclude that a periodontal state assessment could help identify those at risk, recognizing as statistically significant and common risk factors both COVID-19 and periodontitis in diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases [43,44]. Indeed, it has been hypothesized that periodontitis, poor oral hygiene and periodontal microbiome may themselves constitute risk factors for complications from COVID-19 and the worsening of illness forms [26,45]. It may be consequently proposed that instructions and motivation for oral hygiene and, above all, active periodontal treatment should be systematically integrated into inter-disciplinary management in subjects with mild and moderate COVID-19, and where possible, in severe cases, especially in those with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, considering periodontal pockets as possible reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2, as already amply demonstrated for herpesviruses, including herpes simplex, Epstein-Barr virus andhuman cytomegalovirus [46], it may be hypothesized that periodontal treatment and oral antisepsis with chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide, by controlling suspected periodontal pathogens and viral microbial load, may reduce the risk of re-infection in COVID-19 healed subjects [11,47].
Despite the very inclusive eligibility criteria applied, only few and poor-quality systematic reviews could be retrieved. Moreover, high heterogeneous and incomplete data were extracted, precluding the possibility of conducting a meta-analysis and achieving definitive results, which may represent the main limitation of the study. However, the present study may be the first to synthesize findings from available systematic reviews and aim to grade, based on the reported frequency, the oral primary lesions, with clinical presentations and microscopic features, and to estimate their degree of association with SARS-CoV-2 infection [12] and with COVID-19 severity [13].
Further studies with a higher evidence level should be conducted to accurately describe and assess the prevalence of cases diagnosed with oral lesions among adult SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects, especially considering novel variants and occurring following vaccine administration. Additional investigations may also aid in grading the frequency of primary oral lesions with related clinical presentations and microscopic features and in determining their degree of association with SARS-CoV-2 infection [12] and with COVID-19 forms [13]. Furthermore, the putative role of SARS-CoV-2 in oral lesion genesis, on the one hand, and the supposed contribution of periodontitis and periodontal microbiome, seemingly interconnected with the gut–lung axis [45], in COVID-19 worsening and re-activations, on the other hand, should be evaluated.
Deeper insights into oral lesions in adult SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects, which may behypothetically attributable to the direct cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 or to the indirect effect of the immune–inflammatory reactions occurring in the course of the disease or may be somehow related to COVID-19 pharmacological therapy and treatment procedures, could enhance the comprehension of illness pathogenesis, thus improving the preparedness of health professionals, including oral healthcare workers [4,48,49,50,51,52,53,54], in the inter-disciplinary management of COVID-19 [55,56,57].

5. Conclusions

It is well known that multiple viral pathogens, first of all, Herpes and human Papilloma viruses, are directly responsible for the genesis of benign, potentially malignant and malignant lesions of the oral mucosa, underlining the necessity to examine the potential causative role of SARS-CoV-2 in oral lesions.
However, at the current state of knowledge, the small number of cases with oral lesions described in the literature and diagnosed by specialized clinicians, the poor quality of the studies reporting them, along with the heterogeneity of the denominations used, the complexity and polymorphism of the macroscopic pictures delineated, as well as the scarcity of microscopic features and data concerning the timing of appearance, patients’ characteristics, COVID-19 severity and ongoing treatments, do not make it possible to accurately estimate the prevalence of these lesions, their degree of association with COVID-19 severity and their occurrence in the natural history of the disease.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.D.S., A.R. and S.L.; Methodology, A.A. and M.C.; Validation, F.D.S. and S.M.; Formal Analysis, F.D.S. and S.M.; Data Curation, A.I. and S.M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, F.D.S.; Writing—Review and Editing, A.I., A.A., M.C., A.R., S.L. and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research study received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Retrieved data are available on Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed and BioMed Central databases, and on the PROSPERO register.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Orozco, M.S.; Niño-Martínez, N.; Martínez-Castañón, G.-A.; Marín, N.P.; Valencia, C.S.; Velázquez, F.D.; Munguía, P.S.; Santana, M.C. Presence of SARS-CoV-2 and Its Entry Factors in Oral Tissues and Cells: A Systematic Review. Medicina 2021, 57, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wan, S.; Li, M.; Ye, Z.; Yang, C.; Cai, Q.; Duan, S.; Song, B. CT Manifestations and Clinical Characteristics of 1115 Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad. Radiol. 2020, 27, 910–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Recalcati, S. Cutaneous manifestations in COVID-19: A first perspective. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020, 34, e212–e213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rocha, B.A.; Souto, G.R.; Grossmann, S.D.M.C.; de Aguiar, M.C.F.; de Andrade, B.A.B.; Romañach, M.J.; Horta, M.C.R. Viral enanthema in oral mucosa: A possible diagnostic challenge in the COVID-19 pandemic. Oral Dis. 2021, 27, 776–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Gan, F.; Du, Y.; Yao, Y. Salivary Glands: Potential Reservoirs for COVID-19 Asymptomatic Infection. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Xu, H.; Zhong, L.; Deng, J.; Peng, J.; Dan, H.; Zeng, X.; Li, T.; Chen, Q. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2020, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mazur, M.; Duś-Ilnicka, I.; Jedliński, M.; Ndokaj, A.; Janiszewska-Olszowska, J.; Ardan, R.; Radwan-Oczko, M.; Guerra, F.; Luzzi, V.; Vozza, I.; et al. Facial and Oral Manifestations Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Survey-Based Study and a First Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martín Carreras-Presas, C.; Amaro Sánchez, J.; López-Sánchez, A.F.; Jané-Salas, E.; Somacarrera Pérez, M.L. Oral vesiculobullous lesions associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Oral Dis. 2021, 27, 710–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Petrescu, N.; Lucaciu, O.; Roman, A. Oral mucosa lesions in COVID-19. Oral Dis. 2022, 28, 935–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vieira, A.R. Oral manifestations in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Oral Dis. 2020, 27, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Di Spirito, F.; Pelella, S.; Argentino, S.; Sisalli, L.; Sbordone, L. Oral manifestations and the role of the oral healthcare workers in COVID-19. Oral Dis. 2022, 28, 1003–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Classification and diagnostic criteria for oral lesions in HIV infection. EC-Clearinghouse on Oral Problems Related to HIV Infection and WHO Collaborating Centre on Oral Manifestations of the Immunodeficiency Virus. J. Oral Pathol. Med. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Oral Pathol. Am. Acad. Oral Pathol. 1993, 22, 289–291. [Google Scholar]
  13. World Health Organization (WHO). Living Guidance for Clinical Management of COVID-19: Living Guidance. Available online: WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2021.2-eng.pdf (accessed on 7 May 2022).
  14. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Higgins, J.; Thomas, J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. Oivio, U.-M.; Pesonen, P.; Ylipalosaari, M.; Kullaa, A.; Salo, T. Prevalence of oral mucosal normal variations and lesions in a middle-aged population: A Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study. BMC Oral Health 2020, 20, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. dos Santos, J.A.; Normando, A.G.; Da Silva, R.C.; Acevedo, A.; Canto, G.D.L.; Sugaya, N.; Santos-Silva, A.; Guerra, E. Oral Manifestations in Patients with COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review. J. Dent. Res. 2021, 100, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shea, B.J.; Reeves, B.C.; Wells, G.; Thuku, M.; Hamel, C.; Moran, J.; Moher, D.; Tugwell, P.; Welch, V.; Kristjansson, E.; et al. AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 2017, 358, j4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pavan, N.; Crestani, A.; Abrate, A.; De Nunzio, C.; Esperto, F.; Giannarini, G.; Galfano, A.; Gregori, A.; Liguori, G.; Bartoletti, R.; et al. Risk of Virus Contamination Through Surgical Smoke During Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature on a Neglected Issue Revived in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era. Eur. Urol. Focus 2020, 6, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nascimento, R.B.; Araujo, N.S.; Silva, J.C.; Xavier, F.C.A. Oral manifestations of multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and Kawasaki disease associated to COVID-19: A systematic review. Spec. Care Dent. Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Hosp. Dent. Acad. Dent. Handicap. Am. Soc. Geriatr. Dent. 2021, 42, 266–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Triantafyllidis, K.K.; Giannos, P.; Mian, I.T.; Kyrtsonis, G.; Kechagias, K.S. Varicella Zoster Virus Reactivation Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review of Case Reports. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. dos Santos, J.A.; Normando, A.; da Silva, R.C.; Acevedo, A.; Canto, G.D.L.; Sugaya, N.; Santos-Silva, A.; Guerra, E. Oral Manifestations in Patients with COVID-19: A 6-Month Update. J. Dent. Res. 2021, 100, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aragoneses, J.; Suárez, A.; Algar, J.; Rodríguez, C.; López-Valverde, N.; Aragoneses, J.M. Oral Manifestations of COVID-19: Updated Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 726753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bhujel, N.; Zaheer, K.; Singh, R.P. Oral mucosal lesions in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021, 59, 1024–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cuevas-Gonzalez, M.V.; Espinosa-Cristóbal, L.F.; Donohue-Cornejo, A.; Tovar-Carrillo, K.L.; Saucedo-Acuña, R.A.; García-Calderón, A.G.; Guzmán-Gastelum, D.A.; Cuevas-Gonzalez, J.C. COVID-19 and its manifestations in the oral cavity: A systematic review. Medicine 2021, 100, e28327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Doceda, M.V.; Gavriiloglou, M.; Petit, C.; Huck, O. Oral Health Implications of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19: A Systematic Review. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2022, 20, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Erbaş, G.S.; Botsali, A.; Erden, N.; Arı, C.; Taşkın, B.; Alper, S.; Vural, S. COVID-19-related oral mucosa lesions among confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients: A systematic review. Int. J. Dermatol. 2022, 61, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nijakowski, K.; Wyzga, S.; Singh, N.; Podgórski, F.; Surdacka, A. Oral Manifestations in SARS-CoV-2 Positive Patients: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Orilisi, G.; Mascitti, M.; Togni, L.; Monterubbianesi, R.; Tosco, V.; Vitiello, F.; Santarelli, A.; Putignano, A.; Orsini, G. Oral Manifestations of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qi, X.; Northridge, M.E.; Hu, M.; Wu, B. Oral health conditions and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence. Aging Health Res. 2022, 2, 100064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prevalence of Oral Manifestations in COVID-19: A Systematic Review. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rmv.2345 (accessed on 7 May 2022).
  32. Silveira, F.M.; Mello, A.L.R.; Fonseca, L.D.S.; Ferreira, L.D.S.; Kirschnick, L.B.; Martins, M.D.; Schuch, L.F.; de Arruda, J.A.A.; Soares, C.D.; Sales, A.D.O.; et al. Morphological and tissue-based molecular characterization of oral lesions in patients with COVID-19: A living systematic review. Arch. Oral Biol. 2022, 136, 105374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Uzêda-E-Silva, V.D.; de Sá, I.B.; Martins, J.; Pedreira, N.; Vieira, V.; Silva, B. Oral lesions associated with COVID-19: A systematic review. Stomatologija 2021, 23, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nuno-Gonzalez, A.; Martin-Carrillo, P.; Magaletsky, K.; Rios, M.M.; Mañas, C.H.; Almazan, J.A.; Casasola, G.G.; Castro, E.P.; Arenas, A.G.; Ibarguren, A.M.; et al. Prevalence of mucocutaneous manifestations in 666 patients with COVID-19 in a field hospital in Spain: Oral and palmoplantar findings. Br. J. Dermatol. 2021, 184, 184–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gebhard, C.; Regitz-Zagrosek, V.; Neuhauser, H.K.; Morgan, R.; Klein, S.L. Impact of sex and gender on COVID-19 outcomes in Europe. Biol. Sex Differ. 2020, 11, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tay, M.Z.; Poh, C.M.; Rénia, L.; Macary, P.A.; Ng, L.F.P. The trinity of COVID-19: Immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Iranmanesh, B.; Khalili, M.; Amiri, R.; Zartab, H.; Aflatoonian, M. Oral manifestations of COVID-19 disease: A review article. Dermatol. Ther. 2021, 34, e14578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Di Spirito, F.; Iacono, V.J.; Alfredo, I.; Alessandra, A.; Sbordone, L.; Lanza, A. Evidence-based Recommendations on Periodontal Practice and the Management of Periodontal Patients during and after the COVID-19 Era: Challenging Infectious Diseases Spread by Air-borne Transmission. Open Dent. 2021, 15, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fidan, V.; Koyuncu, H.; Akin, O. Oral lesions in COVID-19 positive patients. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2021, 42, 102905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Elamrousy, W.A.H.; Nassar, M.; Issa, D.R. Prevalence of Oral Lesions in COVID-19 Egyptian Patients. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2021, 11, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Favia, G.; Tempesta, A.; Barile, G.; Brienza, N.; Capodiferro, S.; Vestito, M.C.; Crudele, L.; Procacci, V.; Ingravallo, G.; Maiorano, E.; et al. COVID-19 Symptomatic Patients with Oral Lesions: Clinical and Histopathological Study on 123 Cases of the University Hospital Policlinic of Bari with a Purpose of a New Classification. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Soares, C.; Carvalho, R.; Carvalho, M.; Almeida, O. Letter to Editor: Oral lesions in a patient with COVID-19. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Y Cir. Bucal 2020, 25, e563–e564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gupta, S.; Mohindra, R.; Singla, M.; Khera, S.; Sahni, V.; Kanta, P.; Soni, R.K.; Kumar, A.; Gauba, K.; Goyal, K.; et al. The clinical association between Periodontitis and COVID-19. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 1361–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Di Spirito, F.; Schiavo, L.; Pilone, V.; Lanza, A.; Sbordone, L.; D’Ambrosio, F. Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Systemically Administered Statins: A Systematic Review. Dent. J. 2021, 9, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pitones-Rubio, V.; Chávez-Cortez, E.G.; Hurtado-Camarena, A.; González-Rascón, A.; Serafín-Higuera, N. Is periodontal disease a risk factor for severe COVID-19 illness? Med. Hypotheses 2020, 144, 109969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sampson, V.; Kamona, N.; Sampson, A. Could there be a link between oral hygiene and the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections? Br. Dent. J. 2020, 228, 971–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vergara-Buenaventura, A.; Castro-Ruiz, C. Use of mouthwashes against COVID-19 in dentistry. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 58, 924–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Scully, C.; Samaranayake, L.P. Emerging and changing viral diseases in the new millennium. Oral Dis. 2016, 22, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Lo Giudice, R.; Famà, F. Health care and health service digital revolution. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zannella, C.; Shinde, S.; Vitiello, M.; Falanga, A.; Galdiero, E.; Fahmi, A.; Santella, B.; Nucci, L.; Gasparro, R.; Galdiero, M.; et al. Antibacterial activity of indolicidin-coated silver nanoparticles in oral disease. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Amato, A.; Ciacci, C.; Martina, S.; Caggiano, M.; Amato, M. COVID-19: The Dentists’ Perceived Impact on the Dental Practice. Eur. J. Dent. 2021, 15, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gasparro, R.; Scandurra, C.; Maldonato, N.M.; Dolce, P.; Bochicchio, V.; Valletta, A.; Sammartino, G.; Sammartino, P.; Mariniello, M.; Di Lauro, A.E.; et al. Perceived job insecurity and depressive symptoms among italian dentists: The moderating role of fear of COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Martina, S.; Amato, A.; Faccioni, P.; Iandolo, A.; Amato, M.; Rongo, R. The perception of COVID-19 among Italian dental patients: An orthodontic point of view. Prog. Orthod. 2021, 22, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lo Giudice, R. The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) in Dentistry. Management of Biological Risk in Dental Practice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schiavo, L.; Calabrese, P.; Aliberti, S.M.; Tramontano, S.; Iannelli, A.; Pilone, V. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Lockdown on the Preoperative Care Program of Patients Scheduled for Bariatric Surgery. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Marinaci, T.; Carpinelli, L.; Venuleo, C.; Savarese, G.; Cavallo, P. Emotional distress, psychosomatic symptoms and their relationship with institutional responses: A survey of Italian frontline medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sica, A.; Casale, D.; Rossi, G.; Casale, B.; Ciccozzi, M.; Fasano, M.; Ciotti, M.; Sagnelli, E.; Papa, A.; Sagnelli, C. The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, with special reference to the hematological setting. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 93, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 19 07486 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart.
Ijerph 19 07486 g001
Ijerph 19 07486 g002 550
Figure 2. Reported frequency of oral lesions in COVID-19.
Figure 2. Reported frequency of oral lesions in COVID-19.
Ijerph 19 07486 g002
Table
Table 1. Data recorded or computed by reported findings based on eligibility criteria: first author, year, journal and online publication date, funding and quality of systematic the reviews included in the present study and listed in alphabetical order; number and design of analyzed studies, sample size, gender ratio and mean age of investigated population; total number or prevalence of cases diagnosed, through clinical exam, with oral lesions among the investigated population; COVID-19 illness severity, classified as mild/moderate or severe/hospitalization and ongoing COVID-19 treatment; macroscopic and microscopic features and related frequency of reported oral lesions.
Table 1. Data recorded or computed by reported findings based on eligibility criteria: first author, year, journal and online publication date, funding and quality of systematic the reviews included in the present study and listed in alphabetical order; number and design of analyzed studies, sample size, gender ratio and mean age of investigated population; total number or prevalence of cases diagnosed, through clinical exam, with oral lesions among the investigated population; COVID-19 illness severity, classified as mild/moderate or severe/hospitalization and ongoing COVID-19 treatment; macroscopic and microscopic features and related frequency of reported oral lesions.
SourceAnalyzed StudiesCases Diagnosed with Oral LesionsMacroscopic and Microscopic Features of Reported Primary Oral Lesions
First author, year
Journal
Online date
Funding
Meta-Analysis
Quality
(AMSTAR2)		Number
Design
Investigated Population
Sample size
(n.)
Gender ratio
(M/F)
Mean age
(y.o.)		Number and/or Prevalence
(n.—%)
Gender ratio
(M/F)
Mean age
(y.o.)
COVID-19 Severity
COVID-19 Treatment		Number or Prevalence (n.—%)
Single/Multiple—Location
Cyto/Histopathology
Erosions and Ulcers
Aphthous-like; Erythema Multiforme-like; Herpetiform
Plaques
White; Red
Vesicles and Bullae
Maculae and Petechiae
Amorim Dos Santos, 2021
J Dent Res
11 Sept 2020
No funding
No meta-analysis
Critically low quality		Studies, n.8
OBS (n.0)
CS (n.0)
CR (n.7)
Sample size,
n.8
Gender ratio,
5M/3F
Mean age,
53.75 y.o.		Cases, n.8—100%
Gender ratio,
5M/3F
Mean age,
53.75 y.o.
COVID-19 severity: Hospitalized, n.3;
Non-hospitalized, n.3
MD, n.2
COVID-19 treatment: MD		Erosions and Ulcers, n.5—62.5%
Apht., n.1—12.5%; EM, n.0—0%; Herp., n.1—12.5%
2Single/3Multiple—Location: tongue, n.3; hard palate, n.1 cheeks, n.1; N/D, n.1
Cyto/Histopathology (Soares et al., 2020): Epithelium—severe vacuolization and occasional exocytosis. Mesenchymal layer—diffuse chronic inflammatory infiltrate (mostly positive for CD3 and CD8), mainly adjacent to salivary glands, focal areas of necrosis and hemorrhage, thrombi in deep small vessels.
Insitu hybridization negative for HHV-1, HHV-2, CMV, Treponema Pallidum and EBV; (Ansari et al., 2020): Edema, desquamation, granulation and ulceration with invasion of mononuclear and neutrophilic cells, suggesting a bacterial superinfection.
Plaques, n.1—12.5%
White, n.1—12.5%; Red, n.0—0%
Single—Location: tongue
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
COVID-19 severity: hospitalized
Vesicles and Bullae, n.1—12.5%
Multiple—Location: lip
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
COVID-19 severity: hospitalized
Maculae and Petechiae, n.3—37.5%
Erythematous Maculae, n.2—25%
Multiple—Location: palate, n.2; tongue, n.1; lip, n.1
Petechiae, n.1—12.5%
Multiple—Location:palate
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Other lesions described
Nodule, n.1; Desquamative gingivitis
Aragoneses, 2021
Front Med (Lausanne)
25 Aug 2021
No funding
Meta-analysis
Critically low quality		Studies, n.6
OBS (n.4)
CS (n.0)
CR (n.2)
Sample size
n.2762
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD		Cases, 33%
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD
COVID-19 severity: MD
COVID-19 treatment: MD		Erosions and Ulcers, n.163—17.9%
Apht., n.35—3.8%; EM, n.1—0.1%; Herp., n.3—0.33%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Plaques, n.0—0%
White, n.0—0%; Red, n.0—0%
Vesicles and Bullae, n.0—0%
Maculae and Petechiae, n.34—3.7%
Erythematous maculae, n.20—2.2%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae, n.14
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Bhujel, 2021
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Nov 2021
No funding
No meta-analysis
Critically low quality		Studies, n.7
OBS (n.3)
CS (n.4)
CS (n.0)
Sample size,
n.255
Gender ratio,
160M/95F
Mean age,
56.6 y.o.		Cases, n.210—82.75%
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD
COVID-19 severity: MD
COVID-19 treatment: MD		Erosions and Ulcers, n.5—2.4%
Apht., n.1—0.5%; EM, n.0—0%; Herp., n.1—0.5%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Plaques, n.0—0%
White, n.0—0%; Red, n.0—0%
Vesicles and Bullae, n.19—9.0%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Maculae and Petechiae, n.22—10.5%
Erythematous Maculae, n.21—10%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae, n.1—0.5%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Location: tongue, n.34; cheeks, n.33; gingiva, n.13; lip, n.4; palate, n.11; diffuse, n.1
Other lesions described
Candidiasis, n.28—13.3%; Oral lichen Planus, n.28—13.3%; Hemorrhagic lesions, n.16—7.6%; Desquamative gingivitis, n.1—0.5%; NPD n.7—3.33%
Cuevas-Gonzalez, 2021
Medicine
23 Dec 2021
No funding
No meta-analysis
Critically low quality		Studies, n.18
OBS (n.10)
CS (n.8)
CR (n.0)
Sample size,
n.756
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD		Cases, n.10—1.32%
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD
COVID-19 severity: Hospitalization
COVID-19 treatment: MD		Erosions and Ulcers, n.7—70.0%
Apht., n.0—0%; EM, n.0—0%; Herp., n.1—10%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Plaques n.1—10%
White, n.1—10%; Red, n.0—0%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Vesicles and Bullae, n.0—0%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Maculae and Petechiae, n.5—50%
Erythematous Maculae, n.5—50%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae, n.0—0%
Other lesions described
Candidiasis, n.3—30%; Thrombi, n.1—10%
Doceda, 2022
Oral Health Prev Dent
27 Apr 2022
No funding
No meta-analysis
Low quality		Studies, n.6
OBS (n.3)
CS (n.3)
CR (n.0)
Sample size,
n.1606
Gender ratio,
535M/375F
Mean age,
MD		Cases, n.277—42.21%
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD
COVID-19 severity: 3Hospitalized/3MD
COVID-19 treatment: MD		Erosions and Ulcers, n.117—42.2%
Apht., n.48—17.3%; EM, n.0—0%; Herp., n.0—0%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Plaques, n.0—0%
White, n.0—0%; Red, n.0—0%
Vesicles and Bullae, n.5—1.8%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Maculae and Petechiae, n.45—16.2%
Erythematous Maculae, n.30—10.8%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae, n.15—5.4%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Location: tongue, n.3; lip, n.3; palate, n.6
Other lesions described
Candidiasis, n.32—11.5%; Oral lichen Planus, n.12—4.33%; Hemorrhagic lesions, n.3—1.1%; NPD, n.6—2.17%
Erbaş, 2021
Int J Dermatol
22 Sept 2021
No funding
No meta-analysis
Critically low quality		Studies, n.19
OBS (n.0)
CS (n.4)
CR (n.15)
Sample size,
n.23
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD		Cases, n.23—100%
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD
COVID-19 severity: MD
COVID-19 treatment		Erosions and Ulcers, n.23—104.4%
Apht., n.14—60.9%; EM, n.2—8.7%; Herp., n.0—0%
Multiple—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Plaques, n.0—0%
White, n.0—0%; Red, n.0—0%
Vesicles and Bullae, n.2—8.7%
Multiple—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Maculae and Petechiae, n.7—30.4%
Erythematous Maculae n.6—26%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae, n.1—4.3%
Multiple—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Location:tongue, n.7; cheeks, n.3; gingiva, n.1; lip, n.6; palate, n.6; diffuse, n.5
Other lesions described
Tongue depapillation, n.2—8.6%; Hemorrhagic lesions, n.3—12.9%
Multiple
Nijakowski, 2022
J Clin Med
14 Apr 2022
No funding
Meta-analysis
Low quality		Studies, n.12
OBS (n.10)
CS (n.2)
CR (n.0)
Sample size,
n.3287
Gender ratio,
1997M/920F
(6792MD)
Mean age,
50.5 y.o.		Cases, n.1587—13.54%
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD
COVID-19 severity: MD
COVID-19 treatment: MD		Erosions and Ulcers, n.347—49.6%
Apht., n.266—16.8%; EM, n.30—1.9%; Herp., n.17—1.1%;
Multiple
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Plaques, n.4—0.25%
White, n.4—0.25%; Red, n.0—0%
Single/Multiple: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Vesicles and Bullae, n.79—4.97%
Multiple
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Maculae and Petechiae, n.261—16.44%
Erythematous Maculae, n.198—12.47%
Single/Multiple: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae, n.63—3.96%
Single/Multiple: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Location:tongue, n.295; cheeks and lip, n.218; gingiva, n.45; palate, n.43; diffuse n.37
Other lesions described
Candidiasis, n.161—10.1%; Oral lichen Planus, n.67—4.2%; Hemorrhagic lesions, n.36—2.3%; Desquamative gingivitis, n.10—0.6%; NPD n.20—1.3%
Orilisi, 2021
Int J Environm Res Public Health
27 Nov 2021
No funding
No meta-analysis
Low quality		Studies, n.36
OBS (n.8)
CS (n.15)
CR (n.13)
Sample size,
n.1219
Gender ratio,
456M/374F and 389 N/D
Mean age,
50.8 y.o.		Cases, n.834—68.41%
Gender ratio,
423M/380F
Mean age,
55.7 y.o.
COVID-19 severity. Hospitalized/Non-hospitalized
COVID-19 treatment: MD		Erosions and Ulcers, n.76—9.11%
Apht., n.10—1.2%; EM, n.0—0%; Herp., n.0—0%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Plaques, n.1—1.2%
White, n.1—1.2%; Red, n.0—0%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Vesicles and Bullae, n.19—2.3%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Maculae and Petechiae, n.18—2.15%
Erythematous Maculae n.2—0.2%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae n.16—1.9%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Other lesions described
Candidiasis, n.5—0.6%; Swelling of the tongue, n.2—0.2%; NPD, n.7—0.8%
Qi, 2022
AHR
5 Mar 2022
Partial funding from national Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) U01 DE027512-01 and NIH/National Institute of Aging (NIA) R56 AG067619-01
Meta-analysis
Critically low quality		Studies, n.6
OBS (n.6)
CS (n.0)
CR (n.0)
Sample size,
n.1562
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD		Cases, n.250–16.00%
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD
COVID-19 severity: Hospitalized/Non-hospitalized
COVID-19 treatment: MD		Erosions and Ulcers, n.77—30.8%
Apht.-like, n.61—24.4%; EM, n.26—10.4%; Herp., n.0—0%;
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Plaques, n.0—0%
White, n.0—0%; Red, n.0—0%
Vesicles and Bullae, n.19—7.6%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Maculae and Petechiae n.36—14.4%
Erythematous Maculae n.22—8.8%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae n.14—5.6%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Sharma, 2022
Rev Med Virol
10 Mar 2022
No funding
No meta-analysis
Critically low quality		Studies, n.34
OBS (n.21)
CS (n.3)
CR (n.10)
Sample size,
n.764
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD		Cases, n.69–9.03%
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
MD
COVID-19 severity: MD
COVID-19 treatment: MD		Erosions and Ulcers, n.48—69.6%
Apht., n.46—67.7%; EM, n.0—0%; Herp., n.2—2.9%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Plaques, n.0—0%
White, n.0—0%; Red, n.0—0%
Vesicles and Bullae, n.1—1.4%
Multiple—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Maculae and Petechiae, n.2—2.9%
Erythematous Maculae, n.2—2.9%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae, n.0—0%
Other lesions described
Candidiasis, n.7—10.1%
Silveira, 2022
Arch Oral Biol
12 Feb 2022
Partialfunding fromSectorial Commission for Scientific Research (CSIC) 2018,University of the Republic, Uruguay
No meta-analysis
Critically low quality		Studies, n.4
OBS (n.0)
CS (NA)
CR (NA)
Sample size,
n.5
Gender ratio,
3M/2F
Mean age,
47.6 y.o.		Cases, n.5–100%
Gender ratio,
3M/2F
Mean age,
47.6 y.o.
COVID-19 severity: MD
COVID-19 treatment: Supportive, n.3 Antibiotics, n.2;
Antivirals, n.1		Erosions and Ulcers, n.5—100%
Apht., n.0—0%; EM, n.0—0%; Herp., n.0—0%
Single/Multiple: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: Epithelial Layer—Vacuolization (100.0%); Exocytosis 5 (100.0%). Mesenchymal Layer—Inflammation (60.0%); Thrombi/microvascular thrombosis (60.0%); Hemorrhage and Necrosis (40.0)
Plaques, n.0—0%
White, n.0—0%; Red, n.0—0%
Vesicles and Bullae, n.1—20%
Multiple
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Maculae and Petechiae, n.2—40%
Erythematous Maculae, n.2—40%
Single/Multiple: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae, n.0—0%
Location: tongue, n.2; cheeks, n.1; lip, n.2; palate, n.3
Uzêda-E-Silva, 2021
Stomatologija
Mar 2022
No funding
No meta-analysis
Critically low quality		Studies, n.20
OBS (n.0)
CS (n.0)
CR (n.1)
Letters (n.15)
Comments (n.2)
Sample size,
n.16
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
40.5 y.o.		Cases, n.16—100%
Gender ratio,
MD
Mean age,
40.5 y.o.
COVID-19 severity: MD
COVID-19 treatment: MD		Erosions and Ulcers, n.5—31.2%
Apht., n.2—12.5%; EM, n.1—6.2%; Herp., n.2—12.5%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Plaques, n.1
White, n.1; Red, n.0—0%
Single/Multiple: MD—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Vesicles and Bullae, n.2—12.5%
Multiple—Location: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Maculae and Petechiae, n.3—18.7%
Erythematous Maculae, n.2—12.5%
Single/Multiple: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Petechiae, n.1—6.5%
Single/Multiple: MD
Cyto/Histopathology: MD
Other lesions described
NPD, n. 1—6.25%
Abbreviations: Case report, “CS”; case series, “CS”; observational study, “OBS”; males, “M”; females, “F”; years old, “y.o.”; number, “n.”; Ppercentage, “%”; not defined, “N/D”; missing data, “MD”; Aphthous-like, “Apht.”; Erythema Multiforme-like, “EM”; Herpetiform, “Herp.”; Necrotizing Periodontal Disease, “NPD”.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Spirito, F.; Iandolo, A.; Amato, A.; Caggiano, M.; Raimondo, A.; Lembo, S.; Martina, S. Prevalence, Features and Degree of Association of Oral Lesions in COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7486. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127486

AMA Style

Di Spirito F, Iandolo A, Amato A, Caggiano M, Raimondo A, Lembo S, Martina S. Prevalence, Features and Degree of Association of Oral Lesions in COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(12):7486. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127486

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Spirito, Federica, Alfredo Iandolo, Alessandra Amato, Mario Caggiano, Annunziata Raimondo, Serena Lembo, and Stefano Martina. 2022. "Prevalence, Features and Degree of Association of Oral Lesions in COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 12: 7486. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127486

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop