Next Article in Journal
Predictors of Food Insecurity among Australian University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation of Air Puff Tonometry Test Using Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) Deforming Mesh for Corneal Material Characterisation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Comment

Learning by Doing…Errors! Comment on Gil-Lacruz et al. Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1397

Dipartimento di Scienze Psicologiche, della Salute e del Territorio, Università G. d’Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010051
Submission received: 6 July 2019 / Accepted: 6 December 2019 / Published: 19 December 2019
In their recent paper [1], Gil-Lacruz and colleagues provided a very interesting study on professional training, seen as a positive measure for improving the quality of the system and a strategy for the prevention of stress and an improved working environment. In particular, they offer an interesting view of a specific kind of training; that is, learning by doing. While this paper contributes to providing an overview of workplace learning by doing in the health sector, stressing all the possible outcomes that are identified and explained, some—a few, to be honest—issues could be further addressed.
First of all, the authors, according to their research aims, frame learning as being, predominantly, an individual-based phenomenon: the process of learning seems to be something that happens between a singular employee and her/his organization. Actually, a growing body of literature refers to learning organizations [2,3,4] and the learning climate, stressing that there are organizational conditions that facilitate learning processes, especially in the health sector [5,6].
This is particularly true for a specific way of learning by doing, which occurs when we make mistakes. In fact, if, in more traditional ways of learning by doing, workers learn by themselves, in error management training, there is the possibility to learn by one’s own errors but also from those of others.
Last but not least, even if the literature stresses the idea of life-long-learning, something explicitly shared by Gil-Lacruz and collegues—meaning that we have to learn on a continuous basis—it would be important to distinguish among early-career, middle-career and late-career stages; especially for the early-career and apprenticeship period, the possibility of making errors and learning from them should be supported by specific training programmes [7,8].
To conclude, health policies related to health care professionals could consider error management programs as a key resource to develop learning and improvement processes in their employees and organizations.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gil-Lacruz, M.; Gracia-Pérez, M.L.; Gil-Lacruz, A.I. Learning by doing and training satisfaction: An evaluation by health care professionals. Int. J. Environ. Research Public Health 2019, 16, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Örtenblad, A. A typology of the idea of learning organization. Manag. Learn. 2002, 33, 213–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Örtenblad, A. The learning organization: Towards an integrated model. Learn. Organ. 2004, 11, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Clarke, N. Workplace learning environment and its relationship with learning outcomes in healthcare organizations. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 2005, 8, 185–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cortini, M.; Pivetti, M.; Cervai, S. Learning climate and job performance among health workers. A pilot study. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. D’Alterio, N.; Fantinelli, S.; Galanti, T.; Cortini, M. The mediator role of the job related stress in the relation between learning climate and job performance. Evidences from the health sector. [Il ruolo mediatore dello stress lavorativo nella relazione tra clima d’apprendimento e performance. Evidenze nel settore sanitario]. Recenti Progress. Med. 2019, 110, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cortini, M. Workplace identity as a mediator in the relationship between learning climate and job satisfaction during apprenticeship: Suggestions for HR practitioners. J. Workplace Learn. 2016, 28, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Myrick, F.; Yonge, O.J. Creating a climate for critical thinking in the preceptorship experience. Nurse Educ. Today 2001, 21, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cortini, M. Learning by Doing…Errors! Comment on Gil-Lacruz et al. Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1397. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010051

AMA Style

Cortini M. Learning by Doing…Errors! Comment on Gil-Lacruz et al. Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1397. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(1):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cortini, Michela. 2020. "Learning by Doing…Errors! Comment on Gil-Lacruz et al. Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1397" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 1: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop