Next Article in Journal
Opportunities for Tailored Support to Implement Smoke-Free Homes: A Qualitative Study among Lower Socioeconomic Status Parents
Next Article in Special Issue
Encounters with Persons Who Frequently Use Psychiatric Emergency Services: Healthcare Professionals’ Views
Previous Article in Journal
Temperament and Sense of Coherence: Emotional Intelligence as a Mediator
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Design and validation of a Nursing Plan for Elderly Patients with Postoperative Delirium
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effect of a Comprehensive Health Care Program on Blood Pressure, Blood Glucose, Body Composition, and Depression in Older Adults Living Alone: A Quasi-Experimental Pretest–Posttest Study

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(1), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010220
by Eun Jeong Hwang 1 and In Ok Sim 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(1), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010220
Submission received: 4 December 2019 / Revised: 23 December 2019 / Accepted: 25 December 2019 / Published: 27 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mental Health Nursing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Manuscript Number: ijerph-673389

Full Title: Effect of a Comprehensive Health Care Program on Blood Pressure, Blood Glucose, Body Composition, and Depression in Older Adults Living Alone: A Quasi-experimental Pre-posttest Study

 

I am pleased to have the opportunity to review the study because the number of older adults living alone has also been continuously increasing that increases social risks in various parts. Overall, the structure and process of the research seem to have been well developed according to scientific research procedures. However, the authors expect to improve the quality of the research by reviewing and supplementing the following points. Details are as follows:

 

Page 2, L51. Please clarify “currently”.

Page 2, L85. It would be beneficial to describe the aim of the study including dependent variables at the end of the ‘Introduction’.

Page 2, L89. Please consider revising the Design section ‘The study was conducted using a quasi-experimental, two-group, pre-posttest design.’ Especially, the “two-group” may need other expressions.

Page 3, L103.  It is important to explore the reason for participants’ withdrawal from experimental studies. Please illuminate the reason in detail.

Page 3, L129. Please replace “Data processing” by other phrases such as “The CHCP program”. It would be helpful to illustrate the program using a table or a figure.

Page 5, L184. Please consider revising the title of ‘Table 1’. Especially, “Homeostasis” is used instead of “Comparison”.

Page 7, L260. It would be appropriate if descriptions regarding the ‘limitation of the study’ moved at the end of the “Discussion” section.

Author Response

Thank you for your kind and professional review.

I tried my best to fix it.

"Please see the attachment"

Thank you again.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review your paper.

This is an important area. Your findings support the plentiful global evidence regarding this age group, they do not provide any novel evidence.

I have made comments throughout your paper.

Good luck in your research endeavours.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your kind and professional review.

I tried my best to fix it.

"Please see the attachment"

Thank you again.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop