Next Article in Journal
Controlling for Structural Changes in the Workforce Influenced Occupational Class Differences in Disability Retirement Trends
Next Article in Special Issue
Social Determinants and Disparities in Active Aging Among Older Taiwanese
Previous Article in Journal
Hard Water, More Elastic Arteries: A Case Study from Krupina District, Slovakia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Utility of Geriatric Syndrome Indicators for Predicting Subsequent Health Care Utilization in Older Adults in Taiwan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/ijerph16091522
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health-Related Quality of Life of Economically Disadvantaged African American Older Adults: Age and Gender Differences

by
Shervin Assari
1,*,
James Smith
1 and
Mohsen Bazargan
1,2
1
Department of Family Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2
Department of Family Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(9), 1522; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091522
Submission received: 19 March 2019 / Revised: 23 April 2019 / Accepted: 24 April 2019 / Published: 29 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Equity of Health and Health Care in Aging Societies)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The association between age and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is still under debate. While some research shows older age is associated with better HRQoL, other studies show no or negative association between age and HRQoL. In addition, while the association between age and HRQoL may depend on race, ethnicity, gender, and their intersections, most previous research on this link has been performed in predominantly White Middle Class. Objective: To explore gender differences in the association between age and mental and physical HRQoL in a sample of economically disadvantaged African American (AA) older adults. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in South Los Angeles between 2015 to 2018. A total number of 740 economically disadvantaged AA older adults (age ≥ 55 years) were enrolled in this study, using non-random sampling. This includes 266 AA men and 474 AA women. The independent variable of interest was age. Dependent variables of interest were physical component scores (PCS) and mental component scores (MCS), two main summary scores of the HRQoL, measured using Short Form-12 (SF-12). Gender was the moderator. Socioeconomic status (educational attainment and financial difficulty) were covariates. Linear regression models were used to analyze the data. Results: AA women reported worse PCS; however, gender did not impact MCS. In the pooled sample, high age was associated with better PCS and MCS. In the pooled sample, a significant interaction was found between gender and age on PCS, suggesting a stronger effect of age on PCS for AA men than AA women. In gender-stratified models, older age was associated with better PCS for AA men but not AA women. Older age was similarly and positively associated with better MCS for AA men and women. Conclusions: There may be some gender differences in the implications of ageing for the physical HRQoL of AA older adults. It is unclear how old age may have a boosting effect on physical HRQoL for AA men but not AA women. Future research should test gender differences in the effect of age on physical health indicators such as chronic disease as well as cognitive processes involved in the evaluation of own’s health in AA men and women.

1. Introduction

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) predicts a wide range of health outcomes, including falls [1], health care use [2], and mortality [2,3,4]. As a result, there has been increasing interest in understanding demographic, behavioral, and social factors that shape HRQoL across various populations [5,6,7]. There is also a particular interest in understanding the factors that can explain decline and those that can be used to enhance HRQoL of aging populations, particularly in demographic and social groups in which HRQoL is low [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Given the consistent disparities across multiple domains of health, African Americans (AAs) report worse HRQoL than Whites [14,15,16,17,18,19]. As a result, it is important to describe the subgroups of AA older adults who report high HRQoL.
There is no agreement on how older age influences HRQoL [20,21,22]. While some research suggesting that older age is associated with better HRQoL, other studies report no effect or worse HRQoL of older adults [22]. Most of the research on the association between age and HRQoL has used predominantly White samples, with less knowledge being available on other racial and ethnic groups such as AAs [21,22,23]. Overall, few studies have investigated HRQoL in AA older adults [11,12]. As the meaning and determinants of subjective aspects of health vary across populations [24,25,26,27], measures such as HRQoL may have different meanings across social groups, and the same HRQoL measures may be differently impacted by same demographic and social and health factors [28,29,30]. One of the factors that may differently impact HRQoL of various populations is age, particularly because age-related changes in life conditions, health, socioeconomic status, and social relations differ across various populations [28,29,30].
For example, falls may be a mechanism that links age to HRQoL [1]. In a study, AAs had better mental HRQoL than Hispanics, suggesting some resilience under adversity among AAs with chronic conditions such as cancer [31,32]. Still, most of the studies are on a particular sample with a chronic condition or disease [19,33]. As most of this research has used disease specific HRQoL which is not generalizable to all general population [34]. More research is needed on the intersections of age, gender, and race on HRQoL of populations.
Some research suggests that not only race and ethnicity [35] but also gender may alter correlates of HRQoL across populations [36,37,38,39]. The effect of gender on shaping subjective aspects of health such as HRQoL differs by location, race, ethnicity, and culture [38,40,41]. We know more about how the meaning and correlates of subjective health measures such as HRQoL and self-rated health (SRH) in Whites than in other racial and ethnic groups.
In line with the global trends, the American population is undergoing an unprecedented ageing process, which is accompanied with and increased life expectancy and presence of multimorbidity. Increased life expectancy combined with an increase in prevalence of non-communicable diseases increases the number of years that the population of older adults live [42]. As a result, there is particularly important to understand how process of ageing is associated with a change in HRQoL [14]. In such a context, maintaining high HRQOl, becomes a marker of healthy ageing, an important objective for policy-makers. Healthy ageing, defined as “the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables well-being in older age” [42], relies on high HRQoL. As a result, understanding HRQoL in older adults, and the effect of age on HRQoL is of primary relevance. Most studies addressing determinants of HRQoL of populations generally focus on patients with a chronic disease. Research addressing gender differences in the impact of age on HRQoL of economically disadvantaged AA older adults is, however, almost lacking.

Aims

To better understand whether gender alters meanings and correlates of subjective health measures in low-income AA older adults [43,44,45,46], this study compared economically disadvantaged AA men and AA women for the association between age and physical and mental HRQoL. In line with other studies that show major gender differences in the meaning of subjective health measures [47,48], we expected differential effects of age on physical and mental HRQoL between older AA men and AA women. We did not have any specific hypothesis regarding stronger or weaker effects of age in a particular gender. This paper extends the existing literature from other populations to economically disadvantaged AAs in an under-resourced urban area.

2. Methods

2.1. Design & Setting

This was a cross-sectional survey of economically disadvantaged AA older adults in South Los Angeles. The study was performed between 2015 and 2018.

2.2. Process and Data Collection

The data collection included structured face-to-face interviews and a comprehensive assessment of medications. The interview collected data on demographic factors (age and gender), SES (educational attainment and financial difficulty), and HRQoL.

2.3. Participants

The study used a non-random sampling strategy to recruit AA older adults from economically disadvantaged areas in South Los Angeles. Using a convenience sampling, participants were eligible if they were AA or Black, were 55 years or older, could complete an interview in English, and were living in SPA6. Institutionalized participants were excluded from the study. Other exclusion criteria included being enrolled to any clinical trial. This sampling resulted in 740 economically disadvantaged AAs aged 55 years and older.

2.4. Comparability of Our Sample

Demographics of our participants were comparable to those of AA older adults in South Los Angeles. In our sample, only 35% had a high school diploma. With a similar pattern, in the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) data, 37% of AA older adults in South Los Angeles had a high school diploma. Regarding the health status of our participants, about one third described their SRH as fair or poor. Again, similarly, CHIS data show that 38% of AA older adults with the same age group living in South Los Angeles report fair or poor SRH [49].

2.5. Measures

2.5.1. Outcome Variables

The HRQoL was measured using SF-12v2, which is a 12-item measure. This measure generates two summary scores and eight sub-domains (or subscales). Summary scores include the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores. Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), Vitality (VT), and Social Functioning (SF) with one item each; and physical Functioning (PF), Mental Health (MH), Role Physical (RP), and Role Emotional (RE) domains, each with two items. To score the SF-12v2, we followed the method proposed by the original authors. The summary scores are calculated from z-scores of the 8 subscales. All scales contribute to the scorings of PCS and MCS, using weights from principal component analysis on the SF-36 scales. The norm-based scoring that is commonly used for SF-12v2 produces scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 for the US population. A higher score indicates better HRQoL [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60].

2.5.2. Predictor Variable

Age was treated as an interval variable.

2.5.3. Confounders

Educational attainment and financial difficulty were the SES covariates in this study. Educational attainment was operationalized as an interval level variable (years of schooling). Higher scores indicated more years of education. Financial difficulty was measured using three items. These items asked about the frequency of not having enough money to afford (1) food, (2) clothing, and (3) paying bills. Items were on a 5-level response scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). A total “financial difficulty” score was calculated, with a score ranging from 3 to 15. A high score was indicative of more financial difficulty. These items are consistent with Pearlin’s list of chronic financial difficulties of low SES individuals [61]. (Cronbach alpha = 0.92).

2.5.4. Moderator

Gender, the effect modifier, was treated as a dichotomous variable (1 = female; 0 = male).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed in SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). For descriptive purposes, means, standard deviation (SD), and frequencies (%) were reported, both in the pooled sample and by gender. We used the independent samples t test and the Chi-squared test to compare our study variables between AA men and AA women. We also ran the Pearson correlation test to explore correlations between study variables in the pooled sample and by gender. For multivariable analysis, we used eight linear regression models, four for PCS and four for MCS as the outcome. In our models, age was the main independent variable, either PCS or MCS was the main outcome, SES (educational attainment and financial difficulty) were the covariates, and gender was the moderator. From linear regression models, b (regression coefficient), standard errors (SE), t Values, and p Values were reported. We ruled out multicollinearity between our predictors. We also tested the homoscedasticity of our outcomes, defined as having equal statistical variances. We replicated our model for self-rated health as outcome (Appendix A).

2.7. Institutional Review Board (IRB)

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), Los Angeles. All participants signed a written informed consent before being enrolled in the study. Participants received a financial incentive.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Statistics

A total number of 740 economically disadvantaged AA older adults who were at least 55 years old entered to this study. From this number, 474 were AA women and 266 were AA men. Average age of the participants was 71.73 (SD = 8.37). Mean educational attainment of this sample was 12.74 (SD = 2.24). On average, their PCS was considerably lower than average US population (mean 40.29, SD = 12.22), however, their MCS was about average US population (52.28 ± 10.93).
Table 1 describes the sample overall and also by gender. This table also compares AA men and AA women for age, educational attainment, financial difficulties, PCS, and MCS. In this study, AA men and AA women differed in age, educational attainment, and PCS and MCS. Regarding age, AA men were younger than AA women. AA women had higher educational attainment than AA men. While PCS was better in AA men than AA women, MCS was better in AA women than AA men.

3.2. Bivariate Correlations

Table 2 shows three correlation matrices between the study variables in the overall sample and for AA men and AA women. As this table shows, in the pooled sample, PCS and MCS were not correlated in the pooled sample, AA men, or AA women. In the pooled sample, male gender was positively and negatively correlated with PCS and MCS, respectively. High educational attainment was associated with better MCS but not PCS in the pooled sample. High educational attainment was associated with better MCS for AA women but not AA men. Older age was correlated with better PCS and MCS in the pooled sample as well as AA men and AA women.

3.3. Linear Regressions in the Pooled Sample

Table 3 shows the results of four linear regression models in the overall sample, with two models having PCS as the outcome and two models having MCS as the outcome. As this table shows, in the pooled sample, age was positively associated with PCS and MCS.
In the pooled sample, a gender-by-age interaction was found in the model with PCS as the outcome, suggesting that the positive association between age and PCS is stronger for AA men than AA women. In the pooled sample, gender and age did not interact on MCS as the outcome, suggesting that the positive association between age and MCS does not differ between AA men and AA women.

3.4. Linear Regressions in AA Men and AA Women

Table 4 shows the results of four gender-specific linear regression models. Two of these models have PCS as the outcome and two of the linear regression models have MCS as the outcome. As this table shows, age was positively associated with MCS in both AA men and AA women. Age was positively associated with PCS in AA men but not in AA women.

4. Discussion

In a sample of economically disadvantaged AA older adults in LA, the current study showed two findings. First, age was positively, not negatively, associated with HRQoL in the pooled sample. This pattern was consistent for PCS and MCS and could be replicated for SRH, another well accepted subjective measure of health (Appendix A). Second, this study documented a gender difference in the association between age and physical HRQoL. Older age was associated with better physical HRQoL in AA women but not AA men. For both AA men or AA women, older age was associated with better mental HRQoL.
Our first finding on the positive association of age with physical and mental HRQoL, which could be replicated for SRH, is similar to some, but not all, studies. In a study that involved 247 older adults composed of 154 Whites, 90 AAs, and 3 Asians, participants reported an improvement in the HRQOL over a two-year follow up period. The study showed that the AAs had greater improvements in mental HRQoL compared to Whites [62].
Overall, age has shown inconsistent effects on HRQoL across studies [63]. Even within a same study, age may have different effects on domains of HRQoL of one population [64]. There are also studies on HRQoL of older AAs which has not included age as a covariate [65]. Some studies have suggested worse HRQoL in older adults [66]. In a study on patients with CMC(s), older age did not result in poor HRQoL across all domains. In fact, older age was associated with better general health perception, suggesting that the general aspect of HRQoL may improve in the elderly, which might be due to changes in coping abilities or expectations. For older adults, HRQoL may reflect a general sense of well-being and life satisfaction rather than physical function [67]. Some research has shown that for older adults, social functioning becomes a more important part of HRQoL than physical health and physical function [68]. Thus, meaning and interpretation of HRQol is unique to the elderly population [69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80]. Group differences in the meaning of SRH is commonly shown [62,63,64,65,66,73].
The observed positive associations between age and PCS/MCS in this study may also be due to the mortality cross-over that happens in AAs, compared to Whites [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80]. Due to high mortality before age 65, AA individuals who survive until 65 may be hardier than their peers who did not had the chance to survive to such age. As a result, PCS and MCS of AA individuals who have reached such advanced age may be high because they are a selected healthy group [78,79,80].
Among studies on population differences in determinants of subjective health, there are fewer studies on HRQoL and more studies on SRH. In a recent study in AA adults, for women, SRH was found to operate like a sponge; it absorbed more affective and contextual information compared to AA men [63]. Other studies have also found some related findings. In a study in AA individuals with diabetes, SRH reflected glucose control for AA men but not AA women [47]. In another study of people with diabetes, worse glycemic control (Higher HbA1c) was associated with worse level of SRH in males and females only when all age groups were combined. However, in younger people, the very same association was stronger for women than men, probably due to diabetes-related worries as a result of high HbA1c [67]. Thus, various studies have documented gender differences in the meaning of subjective health outcomes such as gender, race, and their intersections.
Gender differences exist in subjective measures of well-being and health (e.g., HRQoL and SRH). In mainly White samples, poor SRH predicted risk of mortality of men better than women [48,68]. In one of the studies, the author argued that in women, SRH may reflect more contextual and affective information, whereas for men, the main determinant of SRH is CMC [48]. In another study, gender difference in the predictive power of poor SRH on the risk of mortality was attenuated by controlling for co-morbid conditions, suggesting that CMC is one of the reasons SRH better predicts mortality of men than women [68]. Most of this literature, however, is mainly on samples that are predominantly White [48]. The main contribution of this study is to extend this literature to low-income AAs.
There are also studies that do not confirm major gender differences in meanings of SRH. In another study spanning 12 years from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), males and females were compared for trajectories and determinants of SRH. The study, which was mainly composed of Whites, did not show gender differences in the SRH levels at baseline; however, SRH declined faster for men than women over time. Onset of development of CMC, health behaviors such as smoking, and rate of retirement explained the observed gender difference in trajectory of SRH over time [69].
In a study that used the 2002–2015 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data, ordered logistic regression models were applied to predict SRH as a function of two dozen health conditions including CMC, physical symptoms, mental health, function, health care use, and health behaviors by gender. The study found almost no evidence supporting the sponge hypothesis. The study failed to show systematic gender variation in the structure of SRH. The study showed that men and women use a wide-range of health-related frames of reference, mostly in a similar way, to make a judgment regarding their own health. The following gender differences were observed: at mid-life and older ages, men have a higher tendency than women to weigh physical functioning and negative health behaviors as a factor in SRH. The study suggested that only through mid-adulthood, women report worse SRH than men. This pattern is reversed in older ages. The study also showed that the female disadvantage in SRH is fully due to SES differences. The study argued that SRH can be used to measure gender differences in health [70]. A study in veterans also did not find major gender differences; however, exposure to warfare was more predictive of SRH for men than for women [71].
Gender, race/ethnicity, SES, and their intersections change how subjective measures such as SRH and HRQoL reflect health problems such as CMC, depression, and mortality. In other words, poor status in subjective measures do not have the same meaning across groups [62,63,64,65,66]. For example, education and income improves subjective health of Whites but not AAs [72,73,74]. At the same time, SRH predicted risk of mortality of Whites but not AAs [75,76]. This is because SRH does not reflect the same aspects of health for ethnic groups [77,78] and is not the same across countries [38,41,79,80]. In the Fragile Families and Child Well-being Study which followed 2407 AAs, 1354 Hispanic Whites and 894 non-Hispanic Whites for five years for changes in SRH, in all ethnic groups, anxiety and drinking problem were predictive of poor SRH at baseline and over time. However, the study documented cross-ethnic variation in the combined (additive) effects of general anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) on SRH. For AAs, MDD and GAD both predicted a worse trajectory of SRH over time. For non-Hispanic Whites, MDD predicted a worse baseline SRH while GAD predicted better SRH at baseline and over time. For Hispanic Whites, GAD predicted a worse trajectory of SRH; however, MDD was not linked to SRH [62]. In another cross-sectional study borrowing data from the National Survey of American Life 2003, 3570 AAs and 1621 Caribbean Blacks were entered. For AAs, GAD and MDD had independent (i.e., separate) effects on mental SRH. For Caribbean Blacks, however, MDD but not GAD independently affected mental SRH. When the joint (e.g., combined) effects of GAD and MDD were explored, GAD but not MDD impacted poor mental SRH [65].

Limitations

study, causal associations are not plausible. This study did not control several factors such as income, history of psychiatric disorders, chronic diseases. Unbalanced sample size between AA men and AA women may have resulted in differential statistical power between AA men and AA women. This is not a concern, as we found stronger association in the smaller group (with lower statistical power). In addition, with the convenience sampling in that area and excluded institutionalized participants, the results may have over-estimated the HRQoL or underestimated the effects of covariates on the outcome variables. In addition, we only focused on physical and mental HRQoL. Other researchers may also focus on subscales of HRQoL, which were not of interest here. We can also not rule out the possibility that gender differences in response styles result in the observed gender differences in HRQoL. Our study failed to explain possible self-report differences on the data collection. These limitations should be addressed in future studies examining older AA adults’ HRQoL. Despite these limitations, this study contributes to the literature on the intersectional effects of race, gender, and age on populations’ HRQoL.
This study is unable to make a distinction between age- and cohort- differences. Although, as all participants were at least 55 years old, participants were at most one generation different from each other. Particularly in studies that use a cross-sectional design, the association between age and HRQoL may be confounded with cohort effect. Thus, the results may not all be due to aging, but some of it may be due to variations across generations. This issue can be studied in future studies with multiple observations over time.

5. Conclusions

In summation, our findings suggest that among economically disadvantaged AA older adults, age is positively associated with physical and mental HRQoL. Low-income older AA men and women, however, differ in the association of age and physical HRQoL. Age may have a stronger effect on physical HRQoL for economically disadvantaged older AA men than for AA women. The results invite researchers to study how age-related changes in HRQoL differ between AA older men and women.

Author Contributions

M.B. designed the study, conducted the study, collected data, and revised the manuscript. J.S. collected the data. S.A. prepared the first draft of the paper. All authors approved the final draft.

Funding

This study was supported by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Grant 1H0CMS331621 to Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (PI: M. Bazargan). Additionally, Dr. Bazargan is supported by the NIH under Award # “54MD008149” and # R25 MD007610 (PI: M. Bazargan), 2U54MD007598 (PI: J. Vadgama), and U54 TR001627 (PIs: S. Dubinett, and R. Jenders). Shervin Assari is partly supported by the CMS grant 1H0CMS331621 (PI: M. Bazargan), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) grant U54 MD007598 (PI = M. Bazargan), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) grant DA035811-05 (PI = M. Zimmerman), the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) grant D084526-03, and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant CA201415-02 (Co-PI = R. Mistry).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Associations between age and self-rated health (SRH) in the pooled sample.
Table A1. Associations between age and self-rated health (SRH) in the pooled sample.
BS.E.Exp(B)LowerUppertp
Poor SRH
Gender (Male)−0.180.190.840.571.220.850.357
Age (Years)−0.050.010.950.930.9812.080.001
Educational Attainment (Years)−0.060.040.940.871.022.480.115
Financial Difficulty0.050.021.051.021.098.700.003
Constant3.401.3029.94 6.840.009
SRH (1–5)
Gender (Male)−0.190.09−0.09−0.36−0.02−2.210.027
Age (Years)−0.020.01−0.15−0.03−0.01−3.690.000
Educational Attainment (Years)−0.020.02−0.05−0.060.01−1.280.200
Financial Difficulty0.030.010.160.020.053.850.000
Constant4.790.57 3.685.918.470.000
SRH: Self-Rated Health.

References

  1. Ozturk, Z.A.; Turkbeyler, I.H.; Abiyev, A.; Kul, S.; Edizer, B.; Yakaryilmaz, F.D.; Soylu, G. Health-related quality of life and fall risk associated with age-related body composition changes; sarcopenia, obesity and sarcopenic obesity. Intern. Med. J. 2018, 48, 973–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Takahashi, P.Y.; Ryu, E.; Olson, J.E.; Winkler, E.M.; Hathcock, M.A.; Gupta, R.; Sloan, J.A.; Pathak, J.; Bielinski, S.J.; Cerhan, J.R. Health behaviors and quality of life predictors for risk of hospitalization in an electronic health record-linked biobank. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2015, 8, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Tibblin, G.; Svardsudd, K.; Welin, L.; Erikson, H.; Larsson, B. Quality of life as an outcome variable and a risk factor for total mortality and cardiovascular disease: A study of men born in 1913. J. Hypertens. Suppl. 1993, 11, S81–S86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liebman, S.; Li, N.C.; Lacson, E. Change in quality of life and one-year mortality risk in maintenance dialysis patients. Qual. Life Res. 2016, 25, 2295–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Loprinzi, P.D.; Loenneke, J.P. Mortality risk and perceived quality of life as a function of waking time in discretionary movement-based behaviors: Isotemporal substitution effects. Qual. Life Res. 2017, 26, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wan, G.J.; Counte, M.A.; Cella, D.F.; Hernandez, L.; McGuire, D.B.; Deasay, S.; Shiomoto, G.; Hahn, E.A. The impact of socio-cultural and clinical factors on health-related quality of life reports among Hispanic and African-American cancer patients. J. Outcome Meas. 1999, 3, 200–215. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Duenas, M.; Ramirez, C.; Arana, R.; Failde, I. Gender differences and determinants of health related quality of life in coronary patients: A follow-up study. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2011, 11, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Clay, O.J.; Perkins, M.; Wallace, G.; Crowe, M.; Sawyer, P.; Brown, C.J. Associations of Multimorbid Medical Conditions and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Older African American Men. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2018, 73, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Algood, C.; Davis, A.M. Inequities in Family Quality of Life for African-American Families Raising Children with Disabilities. Soc. Work Public Health 2019, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kart, C.S.; Ford, M.E. Exploring the factorial structure of the EORTC QLQ-C30: Racial differences in measuring health-related quality of life in a sample of urban, older adults. J. Aging Health 2002, 14, 399–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, J. Health-related quality of life in low-income older African Americans. J. Community Health Nurs. 2007, 24, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jang, Y.; Chiriboga, D.A.; Borenstein, A.R.; Small, B.J.; Mortimer, J.A. Health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older Whites and African Americans. J. Aging Health 2009, 21, 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, L.; Ferguson, T.F.; Simonsen, N.; Chen, L.; Tseng, T.S. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health-Related Quality of Life among Participants with Self-Reported Diabetes from NHANES 2001-2010. Diabetes Educ. 2014, 40, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B.; Galas, A.; Zawisza, K.; Chatterji, S.; Haro, J.M.; Ayuso-Mateos, J.L.; Koskinen, S.; Leonardi, M. Gender-related differences in the multi-pathway effect of social determinants on quality of life in older age-the COURAGE in Europe project. Qual. Life Res. 2017, 26, 1865–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Campbell, L.J.; Cai, X.; Gao, S.; Li, Y. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Nursing Home Quality of Life Deficiencies, 2001 to 2011. Gerontol. Geriatr. Med. 2016, 2, 2333721416653561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chavers, L.S.; Gilbert, G.H.; Shelton, B.J. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in oral disadvantage, a measure of oral health-related quality of life: 24-month incidence. J. Public Health Dent. 2002, 62, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hayes, D.K.; Greenlund, K.J.; Denny, C.H.; Neyer, J.R.; Croft, J.B.; Keenan, N.L. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in health-related quality of life among people with coronary heart disease, 2007. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2011, 8, A78. [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang, D.L.; Park, M. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic oral health disparities among US older adults: Oral health quality of life and dentition. J. Public Health Dent. 2015, 75, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kao, Y.H.; Celestin, M.D., Jr.; Yu, Q.; Moody-Thomas, S.; Jones-Winn, K.; Tseng, T.S. Racial and Income Disparities in Health-Related Quality of Life among Smokers with a Quit Attempt in Louisiana. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019, 55, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Karanth, S.; Rajan, S.S.; Sharma, G.; Yamal, J.M.; Morgan, R.O. Racial-Ethnic Disparities in End-of-Life Care Quality among Lung Cancer Patients: A SEER-Medicare-Based Study. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2018, 13, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Paulus, Y.M.; Jefferys, J.L.; Hawkins, B.S.; Scott, A.W. Visual function quality of life measure changes upon conversion to neovascular age-related macular degeneration in second eyes. Qual. Life Res. 2017, 26, 2139–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tang, Y.R.; Yang, W.W.; Liang, M.L.; Xu, X.Y.; Wang, M.F.; Lin, L. Age-related symptom and life quality changes in women with irritable bowel syndrome. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 7175–7183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Thomas, D.R. The critical link between health-related quality of life and age-related changes in physical activity and nutrition. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001, 56, M599–M602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Owen, W.F., Jr. Racial differences in incidence, outcome, and quality of life for African-Americans on hemodialysis. Blood Purif. 1996, 14, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Johnson, C.D.; Wicks, M.N.; Milstead, J.; Hartwig, M.; Hathaway, D.K. Racial and gender differences in quality of life following kidney transplantation. Image J. Nurs. Sch. 1998, 30, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gralnek, I.M.; Hays, R.D.; Kilbourne, A.M.; Chang, L.; Mayer, E.A. Racial differences in the impact of irritable bowel syndrome on health-related quality of life. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2004, 38, 782–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Unruh, M.; Miskulin, D.; Yan, G.; Hays, R.D.; Benz, R.; Kusek, J.W.; Meyer, K.B.; Group, H.S. Racial differences in health-related quality of life among hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2004, 65, 1482–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. McCollister, K.E.; Zheng, D.D.; Fernandez, C.A.; Lee, D.J.; Lam, B.L.; Arheart, K.L.; Galor, A.; Ocasio, M.; Muennig, P. Racial disparities in quality-adjusted life-years associated with diabetes and visual impairment. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 1692–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ghazi, L.J.; Lydecker, A.D.; Patil, S.A.; Rustgi, A.; Cross, R.K.; Flasar, M.H. Racial differences in disease activity and quality of life in patients with Crohn’s disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2014, 59, 2508–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bradley, C.J.; Wilk, A. Racial differences in quality of life and employment outcomes in insured women with breast cancer. J. Cancer Surviv. 2014, 8, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ashing, K.T.; George, M.; Jones, V. Health-related quality of life and care satisfaction outcomes: Informing psychosocial oncology care among Latina and African-American young breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2018, 27, 1213–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Orom, H.; Biddle, C.; Underwood, W., 3rd; Homish, G.G.; Olsson, C.A. Racial or Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Prostate Cancer Survivors’ Prostate-specific Quality of Life. Urology 2018, 112, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Anderson, R.T.; Peres, L.C.; Camacho, F.; Bandera, E.V.; Funkhouser, E.; Moorman, P.G.; Paddock, L.E.; Peters, E.S.; Abbott, S.E.; Alberg, A.J.; et al. Individual, Social, and Societal Correlates of Health-Related Quality of Life Among African American Survivors of Ovarian Cancer: Results from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study. J. Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019, 28, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Reading, S.R.; Porter, K.R.; Slezak, J.M.; Harrison, T.N.; Gelfond, J.S.; Chien, G.W.; Jacobsen, S.J. Racial and Ethnic Variation in Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Prior to Prostate Cancer Treatment. Sex. Med. 2017, 5, e219–e228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Loh, L.C. Racial differences influence health-related quality-of-life measurements. Chest 2012, 141, 570–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tavallaii, S.A.; Fathi-Ashtiani, A.; Nasiri, M.; Assari, S.; Maleki, P.; Einollahi, B. Correlation between sexual function and postrenal transplant quality of life: Does gender matter? J. Sex. Med. 2007, 4, 1610–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Assari, S. Depression Mediates the Effect of Sexual Function on Quality of Life among Men but Not Women with Coronary Artery Disease. Int. Cardiovasc. Res. J. 2014, 8, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Assari, S. Cross-country variation in additive effects of socio-economics, health behaviors, and comorbidities on subjective health of patients with diabetes. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2014, 13, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Assari, S.; Lankarani, M.M.; Piette, J.D.; Aikens, J.E. Self-Rated Health and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Race by Gender Differences. J. Racial Ethn. Health Dispar. 2018, 5, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Assari, S.; Lankarani, R.M.; Lankarani, M.M. Cross-country differences in the association between diabetes and disability. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2014, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Assari, S.; Lankarani, M.M. Does Multi-morbidity Mediate the Effect of Socioeconomics on Self-rated Health? Cross-country Differences. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2015, 6, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Organization, W.H. World Report on Ageing and Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kawada, T. Self-rated health and mortality with special reference to black-white difference. Ann. Epidemiol. 2017, 27, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Okamoto, K.; Momose, Y.; Fujino, A.; Osawa, Y. Gender differences in the relationship between self-rated health (SRH) and 6-year mortality risks among the elderly in Japan. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2008, 47, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kavanagh, A.M.; Bentley, R.; Turrell, G.; Broom, D.H.; Subramanian, S.V. Does gender modify associations between self rated health and the social and economic characteristics of local environments? J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2006, 60, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Spiers, N.; Jagger, C.; Clarke, M.; Arthur, A. Are gender differences in the relationship between self-rated health and mortality enduring? Results from three birth cohorts in Melton Mowbray, United Kingdom. Gerontologist 2003, 43, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Assari, S.; Caldwell, C.H. Teacher Discrimination Reduces School Performance of African American Youth: Role of Gender. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Assari, S. Gender differences in the predictive role of self-rated health on short-term risk of mortality among older adults. SAGE Open Med. 2016, 4, 2050312116666975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Assari, S.; Smith, J.L.; Zimmerman, M.A.; Bazargan, M. Cigarette Smoking among Economically Disadvantaged African-American Older Adults in South Los Angeles: Gender Differences. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cheak-Zamora, N.C.; Wyrwich, K.W.; McBride, T.D. Reliability and validity of the SF-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey. Qual. Life Res. 2009, 18, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Fleishman, J.A.; Selim, A.J.; Kazis, L.E. Deriving SF-12v2 physical and mental health summary scores: A comparison of different scoring algorithms. Qual. Life Res. 2010, 19, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Montazeri, A.; Vahdaninia, M.; Mousavi, S.J.; Asadi-Lari, M.; Omidvari, S.; Tavousi, M. The 12-item medical outcomes study short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2): A population-based validation study from Tehran, Iran. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2011, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Monteagudo Piqueras, O.; Hernando Arizaleta, L.; Palomar Rodriguez, J.A. [Population based norms of the Spanish version of the SF-12V2 for Murcia (Spain)]. Gac. Sanit. 2011, 25, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Frieling, M.A.; Davis, W.R.; Chiang, G. The SF-36v2 and SF-12v2 health surveys in New Zealand: norms, scoring coefficients and cross-country comparisons. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2013, 37, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Carpe Carpe, B.; Hernando Arizaleta, L.; Monteagudo Piqueras, O.; Abellan Perpinan, J.M.; Palomar Rodriguez, J.A.; Alonso, J. Response bias in a population postal survey on Health-Related Quality of Life (sf-12v2). Rev. Esp. Salud Publ. 2014, 88, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Khanna, R.; Jariwala, K.; West-Strum, D. Validity and reliability of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) among adults with autism. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2015, 43–44, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hayes, C.J.; Bhandari, N.R.; Kathe, N.; Payakachat, N. Reliability and Validity of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) in Adults with Non-Cancer Pain. Healthcare (Basel) 2017, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Shah, R.M.; Banahan, B.F., 3rd; Holmes, E.R.; Patel, A.S.; Barnard, M.; Khanna, R.; Bentley, J.P. An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the sf-12v2 health survey among adults with hemophilia. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2018, 16, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wan, E.Y.F.; Choi, E.P.H.; Yu, E.Y.T.; Chin, W.Y.; Fung, C.S.C.; Chan, A.K.C.; Lam, C.L.K. Evaluation of the internal and external responsiveness of Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Qual. Life Res. 2018, 27, 2459–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bhandari, N.R.; Kathe, N.; Hayes, C.; Payakachat, N. Reliability and validity of SF-12v2 among adults with self-reported cancer. Res. Social Adm. Pharm. 2018, 14, 1080–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Laaksonen, E.; Lallukka, T.; Lahelma, E.; Ferrie, J.E.; Rahkonen, O.; Head, J.; Marmot, M.G.; Martikainen, P. Economic difficulties and physical functioning in Finnish and British employees: contribution of social and behavioural factors. Eur. J. Public Health 2011, 21, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Assari, S. Separate and Combined Effects of Anxiety, Depression and Problem Drinking on Subjective Health among Black, Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Men. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2014, 5, 269–279. [Google Scholar]
  63. Assari, S. Suicide Attempts in Michigan HealthCare System; Racial Differences. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Assari, S. Combined Racial and Gender Differences in the Long-Term Predictive Role of Education on Depressive Symptoms and Chronic Medical Conditions. J. Racial Ethn. Health Dispar. 2017, 4, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Assari, S.; Dejman, M.; Neighbors, H.W. Ethnic Differences in Separate and Additive Effects of Anxiety and Depression on Self-rated Mental Health Among Blacks. J. Racial Ethn. Health Dispar. 2016, 3, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Assari, S.; Moazen-Zadeh, E. Ethnic Variation in the Cross-sectional Association between Domains of Depressive Symptoms and Clinical Depression. Front. Psychiatry 2016, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Unden, A.L.; Elofsson, S.; Andreasson, A.; Hillered, E.; Eriksson, I.; Brismar, K. Gender differences in self-rated health, quality of life, quality of care, and metabolic control in patients with diabetes. Gend. Med. 2008, 5, 162–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nishi, A.; Kawachi, I.; Shirai, K.; Hirai, H.; Jeong, S.; Kondo, K. Sex/gender and socioeconomic differences in the predictive ability of self-rated health for mortality. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rohlfsen, L.S.; Jacobs Kronenfeld, J. Gender Differences in Trajectories of Self-Rated Health in Middle and Old Age: An Examination of Differential Exposure and Differential Vulnerability. J. Aging Health 2014, 26, 637–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zajacova, A.; Huzurbazar, S.; Todd, M. Gender and the structure of self-rated health across the adult life span. Soc. Sci. Med. 2017, 187, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, J.M.; Lee, L.O.; Spiro, A., 3rd. Gender differences in the impact of warfare exposure on self-rated health. Womens Health Issues 2015, 25, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Assari, S. Blacks’ Diminished Return of Education Attainment on Subjective Health; Mediating Effect of Income. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Assari, S. Socioeconomic Status and Self-Rated Oral Health; Diminished Return among Hispanic Whites. Dent. J. (Basel) 2018, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Assari, S. High Income Protects Whites but Not African Americans against Risk of Depression. Healthcare (Basel) 2018, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bandiera, F.C.; Assari, S.; Livaudais-Toman, J.; Perez-Stable, E.J. Latino and Black smokers in the Health and Retirement Study are more likely to quit: the role of light smoking. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2016, 14, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Assari, S. Self-rated Health and Mortality due to Kidney Diseases: Racial Differences in the United States. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2018, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Assari, S. Ethnic Groups Differ in How Poor Self-Rated Mental Health Reflects Psychiatric Disorders. J. Racial Ethn. Health Dispar. 2018, 5, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Assari, S. Psychiatric Disorders Differently Correlate with Physical Self-Rated Health across Ethnic Groups. J. Pers. Med. 2017, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Desesquelles, A.F.; Egidi, V.; Salvatore, M.A. Why do Italian people rate their health worse than French people do? An exploration of cross-country differentials of self-rated health. Soc. Sci. Med. 2009, 68, 1124–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jiao, J.; Drewnowski, A.; Moudon, A.V.; Aggarwal, A.; Oppert, J.M.; Charreire, H.; Chaix, B. The impact of area residential property values on self-rated health: A cross-sectional comparative study of Seattle and Paris. Prev. Med. Rep. 2016, 4, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics in the pooled sample as well as African American men and women.
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics in the pooled sample as well as African American men and women.
All n = 740African American Men n = 262African American Women n = 474
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Age (Years) *71.738.3770.798.3272.268.36
Educational Attainment (Years) *12.742.2412.422.5112.932.06
Financial Difficulty (3–15) #9.185.649.706.298.885.23
PCS (0–100) *40.2912.2242.1212.1639.2512.14
MCS (0–100) *52.2810.9351.0010.6853.0011.01
MCS: Mental Component Score; PCS: Physical Component Score; SD: Standard Deviation. # p < 0.1, * p < 0.05 (Independent sample t test).
Table
Table 2. Bivariate correlation matrices in the pooled sample and by gender.
Table 2. Bivariate correlation matrices in the pooled sample and by gender.
12345
All
1 Age (Years)1.00−0.18 **−0.31 **0.17 **0.18 **
2 Education (Years) 1.00−0.08 *0.000.11 **
3 Financial Difficulty 1.00−0.32 **−0.32 **
4 PCS 1.00−0.02
5 MCS 1.00
AA Women
1 Age (Years)1.00−0.25 **−0.32 **0.31 **0.20 **
2 Education (Years) 1.00−0.14 *−0.010.13 *
3 Financial Difficulty 1.00−0.39 **−0.35 **
4 PCS 1.000.07
5 MCS 1.00
AA Men
1 Age (Years)1.00−0.16 **−0.29 **0.11 *0.16 **
2 Education (Years) 1.00−0.010.020.08
3 Financial Difficulty 1.00−0.30 **−0.30 **
4 PCS 1.00−0.06
5 MCS 1.00
MCS: Mental Component Score; PCS: Physical Component Score. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table
Table 3. Summary of linear regressions with PCS and MCS as the outcome.
Table 3. Summary of linear regressions with PCS and MCS as the outcome.
PCS MCS
bSE95% CI tpbSE95% CI tp
Model 1 Model 1
Gender (Male)3.580.891.845.334.030.000−1.170.80−2.730.40−1.470.143
Age (Years)0.130.050.020.232.320.0210.150.050.050.253.080.002
Educational Attainment (Years)0.030.19−0.360.410.140.8910.520.180.180.873.000.003
Financial difficulty−0.660.08−0.82−0.51−8.340.000−0.510.07−0.65−0.37−7.210.000
Model 2 Model 2
Gender (Male)−14.457.58−29.330.42−1.910.057−2.786.81−16.1610.60−0.410.683
Age (Years)0.040.07−0.090.170.600.5460.140.060.030.262.420.016
Educational Attainment (Years)0.060.19−0.320.440.300.7620.530.180.180.873.010.003
Financial difficulty−0.650.08−0.81−0.50−8.230.000−0.510.07−0.65−0.37−7.180.000
Gender (Male) × Age (Years)0.250.110.050.462.400.0170.020.09−0.160.210.240.812
SE: Standard Error, CI: Confidence Interval; MCS: Mental Component Score; PCS: Physical Component Score.
Table
Table 4. Summary of linear regressions with PCS and MCS as the outcomes by gender.
Table 4. Summary of linear regressions with PCS and MCS as the outcomes by gender.
PCS MCS
bSE95% CI tpbSE95% CI tp
Model 3 (Females)
Age (Years)0.040.07−0.100.170.560.5770.140.060.020.262.260.025
Education (Years)0.140.27−0.380.660.530.5980.540.240.071.002.250.025
Financial difficulty−0.680.11−0.89−0.47−6.280.000−0.540.10−0.73−0.35−5.550.000
Model 4 (Males)
Age (Years)0.290.090.110.473.230.0010.170.080.010.332.120.035
Education (Years)−0.030.29−0.600.53−0.110.9150.530.260.021.042.040.042
Financial difficulty−0.630.12−0.86−0.40−5.370.000−0.480.11−0.69−0.27−4.550.000
SE: Standard Error; CI: Confidence Interval; MCS: Mental Component Score; PCS: Physical Component Score.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Assari, S.; Smith, J.; Bazargan, M. Health-Related Quality of Life of Economically Disadvantaged African American Older Adults: Age and Gender Differences. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091522

AMA Style

Assari S, Smith J, Bazargan M. Health-Related Quality of Life of Economically Disadvantaged African American Older Adults: Age and Gender Differences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(9):1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Assari, Shervin, James Smith, and Mohsen Bazargan. 2019. "Health-Related Quality of Life of Economically Disadvantaged African American Older Adults: Age and Gender Differences" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 9: 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091522

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop