Universal or Targeted Antenatal Care for Immigrant Women? Mapping and Qualitative Analysis of Practices in Denmark

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is well written with a few minor grammar issues. Please run the entire paper through www.grammarly.com to fix these grammar mistakes.

Line 8-In the abstract section ANC needs to be defined

35-36-needs to be reworded for clarity example: "a culture" or "the culture"

Line 40- self-centered is misspelled

Line 53-live born should be "live-born"

Lin3 339-should be "their needs" instead of her needs

Conclusion section-There are a few grammar issues such as enrol is misspelled"enrolled" delete "in order" should it be "provision" or "provided" cross cutting should be "cross-cutting" instead of the targeted should be "targeted" should it be "cultural or culturally"

Author Response

Thank you very much for the positive review of our study.

We have revised according to all your comments and made grammar revision using grammarly.com and also carefully revised the details of the text again. Few places we have changed sentences for increased consistency. See the track changes in line 23, 315, 336, 355 and 375.

In line 279 we have included a definition of culture.

We have noticed that some text parts are in font size 8 and others are in size 10, but we have not changed this and leave it to the editorial office.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an interesting paper on an issue that occurs worldwide where women are not in theor native country and give birth.

There are some wording changes required:

Line 219: Should be 1990s (not 1990'es)

Line 339: Sentence commencing "Some...." has poor wording

Line 340: Sentence commencing "However...." is not clear and could be re-worded)

Line 344: The word women's' should be women's

Line 344: I think the word "overseen" is meant to be "overlooked"

Line 350: The opening sentence is way too long. There should be a stop after interpreter services. The next sentence should commence "Care provision...."

Author Response

Thank you very much for the positive review of our study.

We have revised according to all your comments and made grammar revision using grammarly.com and also carefully revised the details of the text again. Few places we have changed sentences for increased consistency. See the track changes in line 23, 315, 336, 355 and 375.

In line 279 we have included a definition of culture.

We have noticed that some text parts are in font size 8 and others are in size 10, but we have not changed this and leave it to the editorial office.