Next Article in Journal
Stimulating Parenting Practices in Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Mexican Communities
Previous Article in Journal
Mortality Rate Associated with Admission Hyperglycemia in Traumatic Femoral Fracture Patients Is Greater Than Non-Diabetic Normoglycemic Patients but Not Diabetic Normoglycemic Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ovsiankina’s Great Relief: How Supplemental Work during the Weekend May Contribute to Recovery in the Face of Unfinished Tasks
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(1), 31; doi:10.3390/ijerph15010031

Contact to Nature Benefits Health: Mixed Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms

1
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Economics and Social Sciences, Social Sciences in Landscape Research, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
2
Media Centre, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
3
Center for Forensic Hair Analytics, University of Zürich, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 31 October 2017 / Revised: 5 December 2017 / Accepted: 12 December 2017 / Published: 25 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stress and Health)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [354 KB, uploaded 25 December 2017]   |  

Abstract

How can urban nature contribute to the reduction of chronic stress? We twice measured the concentration of the “stress hormone” cortisol in the hair of 85 volunteer gardeners (six months apart), relating cortisol level change to (self-reported) characteristics of their recreational activities. Both time spent in nature and physical activity led to decreases in cortisol, while time spent being idle led to an increase. At high levels of present stressors, however, the relationship for time spent in nature and for idleness was reversed. Time spent with social interaction had no effect on cortisol levels. Our results indicate that physical activity is an effective means of mitigating the negative effects of chronic stress. The results regarding the time spent in nature and time spent being idle are less conclusive, suggesting the need for more research. We conclude that if chronic stress cannot be abolished by eradicating its sources, public health may take to measures to reduce it—providing urban nature being one effective possibility. View Full-Text
Keywords: chronic stress; hair cortisol; recreation; gardening; urban nature chronic stress; hair cortisol; recreation; gardening; urban nature
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hofmann, M.; Young, C.; Binz, T.M.; Baumgartner, M.R.; Bauer, N. Contact to Nature Benefits Health: Mixed Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 31.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top