Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials
AbstractAn Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) for nanomaterials (NMs) is outlined in this paper. Contrary to other recent papers on the subject, the main data requirements, models and advancement within each of the four risk assessment domains are described, i.e., in the: (i) materials, (ii) release, fate and exposure, (iii) hazard and (iv) risk characterisation domains. The material, which is obviously the foundation for any risk assessment, should be described according to the legislatively required characterisation data. Characterisation data will also be used at various levels within the ERA, e.g., exposure modelling. The release, fate and exposure data and models cover the input for environmental distribution models in order to identify the potential (PES) and relevant exposure scenarios (RES) and, subsequently, the possible release routes, both with regard to which compartment(s) NMs are distributed in line with the factors determining the fate within environmental compartment. The initial outcome in the risk characterisation will be a generic Predicted Environmental Concentration (PEC), but a refined PEC can be obtained by applying specific exposure models for relevant media. The hazard information covers a variety of representative, relevant and reliable organisms and/or functions, relevant for the RES and enabling a hazard characterisation. The initial outcome will be hazard characterisation in test systems allowing estimating a Predicted No-Effect concentration (PNEC), either based on uncertainty factors or on a NM adapted version of the Species Sensitivity Distributions approach. The risk characterisation will either be based on a deterministic risk ratio approach (i.e., PEC/PNEC) or an overlay of probability distributions, i.e., exposure and hazard distributions, using the nano relevant models. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Scott‐Fordsmand, J.J.; Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M.; Semenzin, E.; Nowack, B.; Hunt, N.; Hristozov, D.; Marcomini, A.; Irfan, M.; Jiménez, A.S.; Landsiedel, R.; Tran, L.; Oomen, A.G.; Bos, P.M.J.; Hund‐Rinke, K. Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1251.
Scott‐Fordsmand JJ, Peijnenburg WJGM, Semenzin E, Nowack B, Hunt N, Hristozov D, Marcomini A, Irfan M, Jiménez AS, Landsiedel R, Tran L, Oomen AG, Bos PMJ, Hund‐Rinke K. Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(10):1251.Chicago/Turabian Style
Scott‐Fordsmand, Janeck J.; Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M.; Semenzin, Elena; Nowack, Bernd; Hunt, Neil; Hristozov, Danail; Marcomini, Antonio; Irfan, Muhammad‐Adeel; Jiménez, Araceli Sánchez; Landsiedel, Robert; Tran, Lang; Oomen, Agnes G.; Bos, Peter M.J.; Hund‐Rinke, Kerstin. 2017. "Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, no. 10: 1251.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.