Next Article in Journal
Physical Aggression and Mindfulness among College Students: Evidence from China and the United States
Previous Article in Journal
Estimating Nitrogen Load Resulting from Biofuel Mandates
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessShort Note
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(5), 476; doi:10.3390/ijerph13050476

Rationalizing the GMO Debate: The Ordonomic Approach to Addressing Agricultural Myths

1
Chair of Economic Ethics, Martin Luther University in Halle-Wittenberg, Grosse Steinstraße 73, Halle 06108, Germany
2
Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 2, Halle 06120, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Iain Gordon
Received: 7 March 2016 / Revised: 25 April 2016 / Accepted: 2 May 2016 / Published: 9 May 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [464 KB, uploaded 9 May 2016]   |  

Abstract

The public discourse on the acceptability of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is not only controversial, but also infused with highly emotional and moralizing rhetoric. Although the assessment of risks and benefits of GMOs must be a scientific exercise, many debates on this issue seem to remain impervious to scientific evidence. In many cases, the moral psychology attributes of the general public create incentives for both GMO opponents and proponents to pursue misleading public campaigns, which impede the comprehensive assessment of the full spectrum of the risks and benefits of GMOs. The ordonomic approach to economic ethics introduced in this research note is helpful for disentangling the socio-economic and moral components of the GMO debate by re- and deconstructing moral claims. View Full-Text
Keywords: agricultural myths; discourse; ethics; GMO; morality; ordonomics agricultural myths; discourse; ethics; GMO; morality; ordonomics
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hielscher, S.; Pies, I.; Valentinov, V.; Chatalova, L. Rationalizing the GMO Debate: The Ordonomic Approach to Addressing Agricultural Myths. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 476.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top