Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
From Eutrophic to Mesotrophic: Modelling Watershed Management Scenarios to Change the Trophic Status of a Reservoir
Previous Article in Journal
An Environmental and Economic Evaluation of Pyrolysis for Energy Generation in Taiwan with Endogenous Land Greenhouse Gases Emissions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Agricultural Land Use Change in the Middle Reach of the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(3), 2992-3014; doi:10.3390/ijerph110302992

Comparing the Selection and Placement of Best Management Practices in Improving Water Quality Using a Multiobjective Optimization and Targeting Method

1
Department of Civil and Disaster Prevention Engineering, National United University, Miaoli 36003, Taiwan
2
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
3
Risk Modeling Unit, Zurich Financial Services Ltd., Mythenquai 2, Zurich 8002, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 December 2013 / Revised: 3 March 2014 / Accepted: 3 March 2014 / Published: 11 March 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1899 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]   |  

Abstract

Suites of Best Management Practices (BMPs) are usually selected to be economically and environmentally efficient in reducing nonpoint source (NPS) pollutants from agricultural areas in a watershed. The objective of this research was to compare the selection and placement of BMPs in a pasture-dominated watershed using multiobjective optimization and targeting methods. Two objective functions were used in the optimization process, which minimize pollutant losses and the BMP placement areas. The optimization tool was an integration of a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) and a watershed model (Soil and Water Assessment Tool—SWAT). For the targeting method, an optimum BMP option was implemented in critical areas in the watershed that contribute the greatest pollutant losses. A total of 171 BMP combinations, which consist of grazing management, vegetated filter strips (VFS), and poultry litter applications were considered. The results showed that the optimization is less effective when vegetated filter strips (VFS) are not considered, and it requires much longer computation times than the targeting method to search for optimum BMPs. Although the targeting method is effective in selecting and placing an optimum BMP, larger areas are needed for BMP implementation to achieve the same pollutant reductions as the optimization method. View Full-Text
Keywords: best management practice; nonpoint source pollution; multiobjective optimization; genetic algorithm; Soil and Water Assessment Tool best management practice; nonpoint source pollution; multiobjective optimization; genetic algorithm; Soil and Water Assessment Tool
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiang, L.-C.; Chaubey, I.; Maringanti, C.; Huang, T. Comparing the Selection and Placement of Best Management Practices in Improving Water Quality Using a Multiobjective Optimization and Targeting Method. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 2992-3014.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top