Next Article in Journal
Applying Evidence-Based Medicine in Telehealth: An Interactive Pattern Recognition Approximation
Previous Article in Journal
Walking for Well-Being: Are Group Walks in Certain Types of Natural Environments Better for Well-Being than Group Walks in Urban Environments?
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10(11), 5629-5670; doi:10.3390/ijerph10115629

Domestic Asbestos Exposure: A Review of Epidemiologic and Exposure Data

1,* , 1,†
1 Exponent, 475 14th Street, Suite 400, Oakland, CA 94612, USA 2 New Era Sciences, LLC, Issaquah, WA 98027, USA 3 Exponent, 2595 Canyon Boulevard, Suite 440, Boulder, CO 80303, USA 4 Exponent, 149 Commonwealth Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA These authors contributed equally to this work.
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 August 2013 / Revised: 18 October 2013 / Accepted: 22 October 2013 / Published: 31 October 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [551 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]   |   Browse Figures


Inhalation of asbestos resulting from living with and handling the clothing of workers directly exposed to asbestos has been established as a possible contributor to disease. This review evaluates epidemiologic studies of asbestos-related disease or conditions (mesothelioma, lung cancer, and pleural and interstitial abnormalities) among domestically exposed individuals and exposure studies that provide either direct exposure measurements or surrogate measures of asbestos exposure. A meta-analysis of studies providing relative risk estimates (n = 12) of mesothelioma was performed, resulting in a summary relative risk estimate (SRRE) of 5.02 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.48–10.13). This SRRE pertains to persons domestically exposed via workers involved in occupations with a traditionally high risk of disease from exposure to asbestos (i.e., asbestos product manufacturing workers, insulators, shipyard workers, and asbestos miners). The epidemiologic studies also show an elevated risk of interstitial, but more likely pleural, abnormalities (n = 6), though only half accounted for confounding exposures. The studies are limited with regard to lung cancer (n = 2). Several exposure-related studies describe results from airborne samples collected within the home (n = 3), during laundering of contaminated clothing (n = 1) or in controlled exposure simulations (n = 5) of domestic exposures, the latter of which were generally associated with low-level chrysotile-exposed workers. Lung burden studies (n = 6) were also evaluated as a surrogate of exposure. In general, available results for domestic exposures are lower than the workers’ exposures. Recent simulations of low-level chrysotile-exposed workers indicate asbestos levels commensurate with background concentrations in those exposed domestically.
Keywords: domestic; exposure; epidemiology; asbestos fibers; take-home domestic; exposure; epidemiology; asbestos fibers; take-home
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share & Cite This Article

Further Mendeley | CiteULike
Export to BibTeX |
MDPI and ACS Style

Goswami, E.; Craven, V.; Dahlstrom, D.L.; Alexander, D.; Mowat, F. Domestic Asbestos Exposure: A Review of Epidemiologic and Exposure Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 5629-5670.

View more citation formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

For more information on the journal, click here


Cited By

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert