Next Article in Journal
Estimating the Public Health Impact of Setting Targets at the European Level for the Reduction of Zoonotic Salmonella in Certain Poultry Populations
Previous Article in Journal
Smoking Behaviour and Mental Health Disorders—Mutual Influences and Implications for Therapy
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10(10), 4812-4835; doi:10.3390/ijerph10104812

Domestic Water Service Delivery Indicators and Frameworks for Monitoring, Evaluation, Policy and Planning: A Review

1
The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
2
IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, Bezuidenhoutseweg 2, The Hague 2594 AV, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 22 August 2013 / Revised: 27 September 2013 / Accepted: 30 September 2013 / Published: 11 October 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [598 KB, 19 June 2014; original version 19 June 2014]   |  

Abstract

Monitoring of water services informs policy and planning for national governments and the international community. Currently, the international monitoring system measures the type of drinking water source that households use. There have been calls for improved monitoring systems over several decades, some advocating use of multiple indicators. We review the literature on water service indicators and frameworks with a view to informing debate on their relevance to national and international monitoring. We describe the evidence concerning the relevance of each identified indicator to public health, economic development and human rights. We analyze the benefits and challenges of using these indicators separately and combined in an index as tools for planning, monitoring, and evaluating water services. We find substantial evidence on the importance of each commonly recommended indicator—service type, safety, quantity, accessibility, reliability or continuity of service, equity, and affordability. Several frameworks have been proposed that give structure to the relationships among individual indicators and some combine multiple indicator scores into a single index but few have been rigorously tested. More research is needed to understand if employing a composite metric of indicators is advantageous and how each indicator might be scored and scaled. View Full-Text
Keywords: drinking water services; water indicators and frameworks; monitoring & evaluation; policy & planning; public health; human rights; poverty reduction drinking water services; water indicators and frameworks; monitoring & evaluation; policy & planning; public health; human rights; poverty reduction
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kayser, G.L.; Moriarty, P.; Fonseca, C.; Bartram, J. Domestic Water Service Delivery Indicators and Frameworks for Monitoring, Evaluation, Policy and Planning: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 4812-4835.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top