- freely available
Mar. Drugs 2013, 11(6), 2042-2053; doi:10.3390/md11062042
Published: 10 June 2013
Abstract: Four new 8-hydroxybriarane diterpenoids, frajunolides P–S (1–4), together with umbraculolide A, juncenolide C, junceellonoid A and juncin R, were isolated from the acetone extract of the gorgonian Junceella fragilis, collected from the southeast coast of Taiwan. Compound 1 contains an unusual pivaloyloxy group at C-2, while 3 is a rare compound having a chlorine atom on the olefinic carbon (C-6). The structures of the isolated compounds were established by extensive spectroscopic analysis, including 1D- and 2D-NMR, as well as HRMS data. Compound 1 was further confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis. In the anti-inflammatory test, compounds 1 and 2 exhibited moderate inhibition on superoxide anion generation and elastase release by human neutrophils in response to formylmethionylleucyl-phenylalanine/dihydrocytochalasin B (fMLP/CB).
Marine invertebrates, especially gorgonian octocorals, have been proven to be rich and important sources of natural products as lead compounds in drug discovery. Members of the gorgonians, Junceella and Briareum, have yielded numerous and highly oxygenated briarane-type diterpenes with a γ-lactone ring, produced from 3,8-cyclized cembranoids [1,2,3]. Many of the briarane diterpenoids have been reported to exhibit interesting biological activities, such as cytotoxic [4,5,6], anti-inflammatory [7,8], antiviral , insecticidal  and immunomodulatory  activities. Our previous chemical investigation of the genus Junceella has resulted in the isolation of over 20 briaranes, including frajunolides A–O and juncenolides A–O [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. As part of our continuing search for bioactive natural products, the chemical constituents from other chromatographic fractions of J. fragilis were investigated. Herein, we report the isolation and structural elucidation of four additional new 8-hydroxybriarane diterpenoids, frajunolides P–S (Figure 1, 1–4), from the acetone extract of this source, collected from the southeast coast of Taiwan. Their anti-inflammatory activities were tested and evaluated by superoxide anion generation and elastase release by human neutrophils in response to formylmethionylleucyl-phenylalanine/dihydrocytochalasin B (fMLP/CB).
2. Results and Discussion
Compound 1, [α]D25 +4 (c 0.5 CH2Cl2), was isolated as colorless prisms and had a molecular formula of C30H42O11 deduced from HRESIMS (m/z 601.2620 [M + Na]+, calcd. for C30H42O11Na, 601.2625), indicating ten degrees of unsaturation. The IR spectrum of compound 1 exhibited diagnostic absorption bands of hydroxyl (3443 cm−1), γ-lactone (1776 cm−1), ester carbonyl (1722 cm−1) and conjugated ketone (1655 cm−1) functionalities. The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (Table 1, Table 2) indicated the presence of a methyl singlet (δH 1.08; δC 16.5, C-15), a methyl doublet (δH 1.19, J = 7.0 Hz; δC 8.5, C-19), one exocyclic double bond (δH 5.02, 4.98, each s, H2-20; δC 112.5, C-20; δC 149.7, C-11), one trisubstituted double bond (δH 6.89, d, J = 9.6 Hz, H-6; δC 134.5, C-5; 136.8, C-6), four oxygenated methine protons and carbons, (δH 5.11, d, J = 7.6 Hz; δC 75.6, C-2; δH 5.31, d, J = 9.6 Hz; δC 78.3, C-7; δH 5.60, d, J = 2.8 Hz; δC 72.8, C-9; δH 4.64, t, J = 2.8 Hz; δC 74.1, C-14), an oxygenated quaternary carbon (δC 83.5, C-8), four methylene carbons (δC 32.3, 24.1, 31.4, 28.9) and two methine carbons (δC 43.9 and 44.7), together with a conjugated ester carbonyl (δC 166.8, C-16) and γ-lactone carbonyl carbon (δC 174.4, C-19). Detailed analysis of spectroscopic data of 1 and comparison with the related structures of the genus Junceella suggested that compound 1 is a highly oxygenated briarane-type diterpenoid with a fused γ-lactone ring similar to juncenolide O, previously isolated from J. juncea . In addition, the remaining NMR spectroscopic data contained a methoxy group (δH 3.81), two acetate groups (δH 2.20, 1.92, each 3H) and a pivaloyloxy group (δH 1.38 × 3, 9H). Furthermore, the HMBC correlation showed that the latter was located at C-2, while the acetyl groups were located at C-9 and C-14, and the methoxy group was attached at C-16. The complete planar structure of 1 was further confirmed by the 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations (Figure 2).
|Table 1. 1H-NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 1–4. (δ in ppm, J in Hz).|
|2||5.11 (d, J = 7.6)||5.00 (m)||4.83 (d, J = 9.2)||5.33 (d, J = 9.2)|
|3||2.53 (m)||2.48 (m)||3.40 (dd, J = 9.6, 3.6)||5.57 (dd, J = 10.4, 9.6)|
|1.80 (m)||1.81 (m)|
|4||2.52 (m)||2.81 (m)||4.08 (d, J = 3.6)||6.30 (d, J = 10.4)|
|2.74 (m)||2.51 (m)|
|6||6.89 (d, J = 9.6)||6.84 (d, J = 10.0)||-||5.96 (d, J = 8.8)|
|7||5.31 (d, J = 9.6)||5.32 (d, J = 10.0)||5.41 (s)||4.91 (d, J = 8.8)|
|9||5.60 (d, J = 2.8)||5.56 (d, J = 3.5)||5.64 (d, J = 8.0)||4.68 (d, J = 5.2)|
|10||3.38 (d, J = 2.8)||3.27 (d, J = 3.5)||2.49 (d, J = 8.0)||3.02 (d, J = 5.2)|
|12||2.23 (m)||2.25 (m, 2H)||2.18 (m)||2.47 (td, J = 12.4, 1.6)|
|1.80 (m)||-||1.78 (m)||1.32 (dd, J = 13.2, 3.6)|
|13||1.80 (m)||1.81 (m, 2H)||2.30 (m)||4.95 (ddd, J = 12.8, 4.0, 2.8)|
|1.40 (m)||1.12 (m)|
|14||4.64 (t, J = 2.8)||4.71 (t, J = 3.5)||4.88 (d, J = 5.2)||5.18 (br s)|
|15||1.08 (s)||1.25 (s)||1.24 (s)||1.09 (s)|
|16||-||-||4.57 (dd, J = 12.4, 8.8)||4.56 (s, 2H)|
|-||-||4.31 (dd, J = 12.4, 6.0)||-|
|17||2.63 (q, J = 7.2)||2.60 (q, J = 7.0)||2.26 (q, J = 7.2)||2.26 (q, J = 6.8)|
|19||1.19 (d, J = 7.2)||1.19 (d, J = 7.0)||1.22 (d, J = 7.2)||1.12 (d, J = 6.8)|
|20||5.02 (s)||5.04 (s)||2.98 (d, J = 4.4)||3.52 (br s)|
|4.98 (s)||4.99 (s)||2.80 (d, J = 4.0)||2.72 (d, J = 2.4)|
|2-OCOCH3||1.92 (s)||1.97 (s)||2.10 (s)||1.93 (s)|
|9-OCOCH3||2.20 (s)||2.23 (s)||2.24 (s)||2.16 (s)|
|14-OCOCH3||-||1.93 (s)||1.96 (s)||1.95 (s)|
|2-OCOC(CH3)3||1.38 (s, 9H)||-||-||-|
|16-OCH3||3.81 (s)||3.82 (s)||-||-|
|8-OH||-||-||5.86 br s||-|
|16-OH||-||-||3.72 (dd, J = 8.0, 6.0)||-|
|Table 2. 13C-NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 1–4 (δ in ppm, mult).|
|1||48.8 (s)||47.4 (s)||44.7 (s)||46.4 (s)|
|2||75.6(d)||73.6 (d)||75.9 (d)||74.1 (d)|
|3||32.3 (tH)||30.9 (t)||58.7 (d)||131.7 (d)|
|4||24.1 (t)||22.8 (t)||59.0 (d)||128.0 (d)|
|5||134.5 (s)||134.2 (s)||135.7 (s)||139.9 (s)|
|6||136.8 (d)||138.1 (d)||132.4 (d)||126.0 (d)|
|7||78.3 (d)||77.5 (d)||75.7 (d)||78.4 (d)|
|8||83.5 (s)||83.5 (s)||81.2 (s)||80.8 (s)|
|9||72.8 (d)||72.8 (d)||66.8 (d)||64.2 (d)|
|10||43.9 (d)||43.2 (d)||40.2 (d)||37.4 (d)|
|11||149.7 (s)||150.5 (s)||61.2 (s)||58.1 (s)|
|12||31.4 (t)||29.4 (t)||24.1 (t)||34.2 (t)|
|13||28.9 (t)||27.3 (t)||24.3 (t)||67.6 (d)|
|14||74.1 (d)||74.8 (d)||72.7 (d)||73.7 (d)|
|15||16.5 (q)||15.0 (q)||14.7 (q)||14.3 (q)|
|16||166.8 (s)||168.0 (s)||58.8 (s)||44.6 (s)|
|17||44.7 (d)||42.9 (d)||42.9 (d)||43.8 (d)|
|18||174.4 (s)||175.4 (s)||174.8 (s)||175.2 (s)|
|19||8.5 (q)||6.6 (q)||6.4 (q)||6.3 (q)|
|20||112.5 (d)||112.7 (d)||58.4 (t)||50.1 (t)|
|2-OCOCH3||-||170.0 (s)||171.2 (s)||170.0 (s)|
|2-OCOCH3||-||20.9 (q)||20.9 (q)||20.8 (q)|
|9-OCOCH3||168.3 (s)||169.3 (s)||169.2 (s)||170.2 (s)|
|9-OCOCH3||23.3 (q)||21.7 (q)||21.9 (q)||21.5 (q)|
|14-OCOCH3||169.6 (s)||170.5 (s)||170.2 (s)||170.0 (s)|
|14-OCOCH3||23.0 (q)||21.2 (q)||21.0 (q)||21.3 (q)|
|16-OCH3||53.6 (q)||52.5 (q)||-||-|
a Signal not observed.
The configuration of the Me-15 in naturally occurring briaranes was previously assigned β-orientation, and H-10 was in the α-orientation. In the NOESY spectrum of 1 (Figure 3), correlations of Me-15/H-14, H-10/H-2, H-10/H-9, H-9/Me-19 and H-7/H-17 suggested that H-7, Me-15 and H-17 were all β-oriented, while H-2, H-9 and H-14 were α-disposition. Finally, the absolute configuration of compound 1 was unambiguously established by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction, as illustrated in Figure 3. Hence, compound 1 was determined as (1S,2S,6Z,7S,8R,9S,10S,14S,17R)-2-pivaloyloxy-9,14-diacetoxy-8-hydroxybriaran-5(6)Z-dien-18,7-olide, and the name frajunolide P was given.
Compound 2 was isolated as a colorless amorphous gum and had the molecular formula C27H36O11, as determined by HRESIMS and distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT) NMR analysis. The presence of a hydroxyl, an ester group and a γ-lactone were consistent with IR absorption bands at 3443, 1736 and 1780 cm−1, respectively. It was found that the 1H- and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (Table 1, Table 2) were similar to those of compound 1, except that the pivaloyloxy group at C-2 was replaced by an acetate group (δH 1.97; δC 170.0, 20.9). This was confirmed by the HMBC correlation (Figure 2) between H-2 (δH 5.00) and the carbonyl carbon at δC 170.0. The planar structure and NMR assignments for 2 were established by detailed analysis of 2D NMR, including 1H–1H COSY, HMQC and HMBC correlations. The configurations of compound 2 were determined by observation of NOESY correlations and on the basis of biogenetic consideration similar to compound 1. Therefore, compound 2 was identified as (1S,2S,6Z,7S,8R,9S,10S,14S,17R)-2,9,14-triacetoxy-8-hydroxybriaran-5(6)-dien-18,7-olide and named frajunolide Q.
The molecular formula, C26H33O12Cl, of compound 3 was obtained from the HRESIMS, which showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 595.1559 [M + Na]+. The presence of a chlorine atom was suggested from an isotope ion at m/z 597.1536 [M + Na]+, which exhibited one-third of the relative intensity of the normal ion peak. The IR spectrum showed absorption bands at 3480, 3241, 1782 and 1742 cm−1, indicating the presence of two hydroxyl, γ-lactone and ester carbonyl functionalities. The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (Table 1, Table 2) further supported the existence of three acetate groups (δC 171.2, 170.2, 169.2, 21.9, 21.0, 20.9), assigned to C-2 (δC 75.9), C-9 (δC 66.8) and C-14 (δC 72.7) with the aid of HMBC correlations between H-2 (δH 4.83, d, J = 9.2 Hz), H-9 (δH 5.64, d, J = 8.0 Hz), H-14 (δH 4.88, d, J = 5.2 Hz) and acetate carbonyls, respectively. The remaining 1H and 13C NMR signals revealed that compound 3 possessed a methyl singlet (δH 1.24, Me-15), a methyl doublet (δH 1.22, d, J = 7.2 Hz, Me-19), one epoxy ring (δC 58.7, 59.0; δH 3.40, dd, J = 9.6, 3.6 Hz; 4.08, d, J = 3.6 Hz), one spirocyclic oxirane ring (δC 61.2, 58.4; δH 2.98, d, J = 4.4 Hz), 2.80, d, J = 4.0 Hz), one tetrasubstituted double bond (δC 135.7, 132.4), two methylene carbons (δC 24.3, 24.1), one oxymethylene (δC 58.8; δH 4.57, dd, J = 12.4, 8.8 Hz; 4.31, dd, J = 12.4, 6.0 Hz), one oxymethine (δC 75.7; δH 5.41, s), two methine protons (δH 2.49, d, J = 8.0 Hz; 2.26, q, J = 7.2 Hz) and two quaternary carbons (δC 44.7,C-1; 81.2, C-8), together with γ-lactone carbonyl carbon at δC 174.4 (C-18). The above observation agreed with a 8-hydroxybriarane with γ-lactone in 3. The structure was further established by detailed analysis of 2D NMR. The signals of the H-20 showed HMBC correlations (Figure 2) with C-11, C-12 and C-10, indicating an epoxy ring at C-11 (δC 61.2)/C-20 (δC 58.4). The other epoxy ring was located at C-3/C-4 by observation of COSY (H-2/H-3/H-4) and HMBC correlations between H-4 and C-5. Finally, the chlorine atom has to be attached to C-6 (δC 132.4) of the tetrasubstituted double bond. This was confirmed by comparison with the NMR data of briarein F . The configuration of compound 3 (Figure 4) was determined by a NOESY experiment and coupled with molecular model MM2 minimized energy calculation . The NOESY spectrum showed correlations of H-3/H-4, H-7/H-4, H-17 and Me-15/H-14 indicated that H-3, H-4, H-7, H-14, H-17 and Me-15 are all β-orientation, while H-2, H-9 and Me-19 favored α disposition, due to correlations of H-10/H-2, H-9 and H-9/Me-19. Moreover, the configuration at C-11 was assigned as S, which was determined by the NOESY correlation of H-10/H-20 and comparison with 13C NMR data of the related literature . The above interpretation suggested that compound 3 was a novel 8-hydroxybriarane possessing a chlorine atom at C-6, and thus, the name frajunolide R was given.
The HRESIMS of 4 exhibited two pseudo-molecular ion peaks at m/z 621.1716 [M + Na]+ and 623.1690 [M + Na + 2]+, accounting for a chlorine atom in the molecular formula, C28H35O12Cl. The IR spectrum showed absorption bands of a hydroxyl (3467 cm−1), a γ-lactone (1780 cm−1) and an ester carbonyl (1739 cm−1) group. The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopic data (Table 1, Table 2) of 4 resembled those of juncenolide B, previously isolated from J. juncea , suggesting that they were analogs. Detailed analysis of NMR and MS data concluded that the only difference between them was the presence of a chlorine atom at C-16 in 4, replacing the original hydroxyl group in juncenolide B. This finding was supported by observation of the chemical shift of C-6 at δC 44.6. The relative configuration of 4 was determined by comparing the proton coupling constants of 4 with those of juncenolide B and NOESY studies. Molecular modeling based on MM2 minimized energy was calculated to confirm the structure as illustrated in Figure 4. Thus, compound 4 was elucidated as a 16-chlorinated derivative of juncenolide B, and the name frajunolide S was given.
Four known briaranes were also isolated and identified as umbraculolide A , juncenolide C , junceellonoid A  and juncin R , respectively, by comparison with the spectroscopic data reported in the literature. The anti-inflammatory activities (Table 3) of briaranes 1–4 were tested and evaluated for their inhibition of elastase release and generation of superoxide anion by human neutrophils in response to fMet-Leu-Phe (fMLP)/cytochalasin B. Compounds 1 and 2 showed moderate inhibitory activities on both superoxide anion generation and elastase release at 10 μg/mL.
|Table 3. Effects of compounds on superoxide anion generation and elastase release by human neutrophils in response to formylmethionylleucyl-phenylalanine/dihydrocytochalasin B (fMLP/CB).|
|Compound||Superoxide anion||Elastase release|
|Inhibition (%)||Inhibition (%)|
|1||32.5 ± 1.5 ***||35.6 ± 3.2 *|
|2||28.7 ± 3.4 *||34.1 ± 2.9 **|
|3||9.70 ± 1.3 **||16.0 ± 5.3 *|
|4||5.80 ± 3.0||−4.5 ± 3.4|
Percentage of inhibition (%) at 10 μg/mL concentration. Results are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared with the control value.
3. Experimental Section
3.1. General Experimental Procedures
Optical rotations were recorded on a JASCO DIP-1000 polarimeter. IR spectra were measured on Hitachi T-2001 spectrophotometer. LRESIMS and HRESIMS were taken on a JEOL JMS-HX 110 mass spectrometer. The 1H, 13C NMR, 1H–1H COSY, HMQC, HMBC and NOESY spectra were recorded on a Varian MR 400 and UNITY INOVA 500 spectrometers. The chemical shifts were given in δ (ppm) and coupling constants in Hz. Silica gel 60 (Merck) was used for column chromatography, and pre-coated silica gel plates (Merck, Kieselgel 60 F-254, 1 mm) were used for preparative TLC. Sephadex LH-20 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB, Sweden) was used for separation. LiChrospher® Si 60 (5 μm, 250-10, Merck, Germany) and LiChrospher® 100 RP-18e (5 μm, 250-10, Merck, Germany) were used for NP-HPLC and RP-HPLC (Hitachi), respectively.
3.2. Animal Material
The gorgonian Junceella fragilis Ridley (Ellisellidae) was collected in Tai-Tong County, Taiwan, by scuba diving at a depth of 15 m, in February 2006. The fresh gorgonian was immediately frozen after collection and kept at −20 °C until processed. A voucher specimen (WSG-5) was deposited in the School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
3.3. Extraction and Isolation
The gorgonian J. fragilis (wet, 3.9 kg) was minced and extracted with acetone (3 × 5 L) at room temperature, and the acetone extract was concentrated under vacuum. The crude extract (33 g) was partitioned between EtOAc and H2O (1:1). The EtOAc-soluble portion (24 g) was shaken with n-hexane-MeOH–H2O (4:3:1), and the MeOH layer was evaporated and separated on Sephadex LH-20 to give eight fractions (L1 to L8). Fraction L3 (3 g) was subjected to column chromatography using silica gel and a gradient of n-hexane/CH2Cl2/MeOH to obtain 33 fractions (L3-1 to L3-33). Fraction L3-14 (111 mg) was separated on NP-HPLC using n-hexane/CH2Cl2/MeOH (40:20:1) to yield 1 (3.5 mg) and 2 (1.0 mg). Fraction L3-17 (104 mg) was subjected to RP-HPLC using MeOH/H2O/CH3CN (70:25:5) to give 4 (7.5 mg), umbraculolide A (18 mg) and junceellonoid A (16 mg). L3-20 (97 mg) was separated on RP HPLC using MeOH/H2O/CH3CN (70:25:5) to obtain 3 (3.5 mg), junceellolide C (12 mg) and juncin R (2.8 mg).
Frajunolide P (1): colorless prisms; [α]D24 +4 (c 0.5, CH2Cl2); IR νmax 3443, 2934, 1776, 1722, 1655, 1379, 1267, 1220 cm−1; 1H NMR data (400 MHz, CDCl3), see Table 1; 13C NMR data (100 MHz, CDCl3), see Table 2; ESIMS m/z 601 [M + Na]+; HRESIMS m/z 601.2620 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C30H42O11Na, 601.2625).
Frajunolide Q (2): colorless amorphous gum; [α]D24 +32 (c 0.1, CH2Cl2); IR νmax 3443, 2923, 1780, 1736, 1645, 1375, 1264, 1219 cm−1; 1H NMR data (500 MHz, CDCl3), see Table 1; 13C NMR data (125 MHz, CDCl3), see Table 2; ESIMS m/z 559 [M + Na]+; HRESIMS m/z 559.2156 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C27H36O11Na, 559.2155).
Frajunolide R (3): colorless amorphous gum; [α]D24 +13 (c 0.3, CH2Cl2); IR νmax 3480, 3241, 2926, 2856, 1782, 1742, 1373, 1252, 1212 cm−1; 1H NMR data (400 MHz, CDCl3), see Table 1; 13C NMR data (100 MHz, CDCl3), see Table 2; ESIMS m/z 595 [M + Na]+, m/z 597 [M + Na + 2]+; HRESIMS m/z 595.1559 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C26H3335ClO12Na, 595.1558).
Frajunolide S (4): colorless amorphous gum; [α]D24 −22.0 (c 0.2, CH2Cl2); IR νmax 3476, 2947, 1780, 1739, 1372, 1250, 1223 cm−1; 1H NMR data (400 MHz, CDCl3), see Table 1; 13C NMR data (100 MHz, CDCl3), see Table 2; ESIMS m/z 621 [M + Na]+, m/z 623 [M + Na + 2]+; HRESIMS m/z 621.1716 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C28H3535ClO12Na, 621.1715).
3.4. Single Crystal X-ray Structure Determination of Frajunolide P (1)
A suitable colorless crystal (0.37 × 0.14 × 0.08 mm3) of 1 for diffraction was obtained by simple evaporation from methanol solution. Crystal data: C30H42O11 orthorhombic, a = 10.1174(2) Å, b = 14.0223(3) Å, c =21.0529(5) Å, V = 2986.76(11) Å3, space group P22121, Z = 4, Dcalcd 1.287 mg/m3, λ = 0.71073 Å, μ(Mo Kα) 90.098 mm−1, F(000) = 1240, T = 293(2) K. A total of 18,766 reflections collected, of, which 5275 unique reflections (Rint = 0.0770) with I > 2σ(I) were used for the analysis. The data was solved using the direct method, and the structure was refined by full-matrix least-squares procedure on F2 values. The refined structural model converged to a final R1 0.0684, wR2 0.1808 with goodness-of-fit = 1.036. The final X-ray molecular model is shown in Figure 3.
3.5. Anti-Inflammatory Assays
3.5.1. Human Neutrophils Elastase Release
Degranulation of azurophilic granules was determined by elastase release, as described previously . Experiments were performed using MeO-Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-p-nitroanilide as the elastase substrate. After supplementation with MeO-Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-p-nitroanilide (100 μM), neutrophils (6 × 105 cell/mL) were equilibrated at 37 °C for 2 min and incubated with each test compound for 5 min. Cells were activated by fMLP (100 nM)/CB (0.5 μg/mL), and changes in absorbance at 405 nm were monitored continuously for elastase release. The results are expressed as the percentage of the initial rate of elastase release in the fMLP/CB-activated, test compound-free (DMSO) control system.
3.5.2. Human Neutrophil Superoxide Generation
Human neutrophils were obtained by means of dextran sedimentation and Ficoll centrifugation. Superoxide anion production was assayed by monitoring the superoxide dismutase-inhibitable reduction of ferricytochrome c. In brief, after supplementation with 0.5 mg/mL ferricytochrome c and 1.0 mM Ca2+, neutrophils were equilibrated at 37 °C for 2 min and incubated with drugs for 5 min. Cells were activated with 100 nM fMLP for 10 min. When fMLP was used as a stimulant, CB (1 μg/mL) was incubated for 3 min before activation by the peptide (fMLP/CB). Changes in absorbance with the reduction of ferricytochrome c at 550 nm were continuously monitored in a double-beam, six-cell positioner spectrophotometer with constant stirring (Hitachi U-3010, Tokyo, Japan). Calculations were based on differences in the reactions with and without superoxide dismutase (SOD, 100 U/mL) divided by the extinction coefficient for the reduction of ferricytochrome c.
Our continuing investigation on constituents of Taiwanese gorgonian Junceella fragilis has resulted in the isolation of eight 8-hydroxybriarane diterpenoids, including four new ones, frajunolides P–S (1–4). In the anti-inflammatory effects on elastase release and generation of superoxide anion by human neutrophils, compounds 1 and 2 exhibited moderate inhibitory activities.
The financial support from the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC 100-2113-M-002-013), is gratefully acknowledged.
- Sung, P.J.; Sheu, J.H.; Xu, J.P. Survey of briarane-type diterpenoids of marine origin. Heterocycles 2002, 56, 535–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, P.J.; Chang, P.C.; Fang, L.S.; Sheu, J.H.; Chen, W.C.; Chen, Y.P.; Lin, M.R. Briarane-relatedditerpenoids Part II. Heterocycles 2005, 65, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, P.J.; Gwo, H.H.; Fan, T.Y.; Li, J.J.; Dong, J.; Han, C.C.; Wu, S.L.; Fang, L.S. Natural product chemistry of gorgonian corals of the genus Junceella. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2004, 32, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez, J.; Nieto, R.M.; Jimenez, C. New briarane stecholide diterpenes from the Indonesian gorgonian Briareum sp. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, P.J.; Su, J.H.; Duh, C.Y.; Chiang, M.Y.; Sheu, J.H. Briaexcavatolides K–N, new briarane diterpenes from the gorgonian Briareum excavatum. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardellina, J.H., II; James, T.R., Jr.; Chen, M.H.M.; Clardy, J. Structure of brianthein W, from the soft coral Briareum polyanthes. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 3398–3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, J.; Park, M.; Fenical, M. The junceellolides, new anti-inflammatory diterpenoids of the briarane class from the Chinese gorgonian Junceella fragilis. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 1633–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groweiss, A.; Look, S.A.; Fenical, W. Solenolides, new anti-inflammatory and antiviral diterpenoids from a marine octocoral of the genus Solenopodium. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2401–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isaacs, S.; Carmely, S.; Kashman, Y. Juncins A–F, six new briarane diterpenoids from the gorgonian Junceella juncea. J. Nat. Prod. 1990, 53, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.Y.; Faulkner, D.J. New chlorinated diterpenes from the gorgonian Junceella gemmacea. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 3271–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y.C.; Chen, Y.H.; Hwang, T.L.; Guh, J.H.; Khalil, A.T. Four new briarane diterpenoids from the gorgonian coral Junceella fragilis. Helv. Chim. Acta 2007, 90, 1391–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liaw, C.C.; Shen, Y.C.; Lin, Y.S.; Hwang, T.L.; Kuo, Y.H.; Khalil, A.T. Frajunolides E–K, briarane diterpenes from Junceella fragilis. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 1551–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liaw, C.C.; Kuo, Y.H.; Lin, Y.S.; Hwang, T.L.; Shen, Y.C. Frajunolides L–O, four new 8-hydroxybriarane diterpenoids from the gorgonian Junceella fragilis. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1477–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y.C.; Lin, Y.C.; Chiang, M.Y. Juncenolide A, a new briarane from the Taiwanese gorgonian Junceella juncea. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y.C.; Lin, Y.C.; Ko, C.L.; Wang, L.T. New briarane from the Taiwanese gorgonian Junceella juncea. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y.C.; Lin, Y.C.; Huang, Y.L. Juncenolide E, a new briarane from Taiwanese gorgonian Junceella juncea. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2003, 50, 1267–1270. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Y.C.; Huang, Y.L.; Khalil, A.T.; Chen, M.H.; Shen, Y.C. Juncenolides F and G, two new briarane diterpenoids from Taiwanese gorgonian Junceella juncea. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 53, 128–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, J.Y.; Liaw, C.C.; Fazary, A.E.; Hwang, T.L.; Shen, Y.C. New briarane diterpenoids from the gorgonian coral Junceella juncea. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 1321–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez, A.D.; Ramirez, C.; Cobar, O.M. Briareins C–L, 10 new briarane diterpenoids from the common caribbean gorgonian Briareum asbestinum. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N.G.J.; Guida, W.C.; Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caufield, C.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.; Still, W.C. Macromodel—An integrated software system for modeling organic and bioorganic molecules using molecular mechanics. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheu, J.H.; Chen, Y.P.; Hwang, T.L.; Chiang, M.Y.; Fang, L.S.; Sung, P.J. Junceellolides J–L, 11,20-epoxybriaranes from the gorgonian coral Junceella fragilis. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subrahmanyam, C.; Kulatheeswaran, R.; Ward, R.S. Briarane diterpenes from the Indian ocean gorgonian Gorgonella umbraculum. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 1120–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Guo, Y.W.; Mollo, E.; Cimio, G. Junceellonoids A and B, two new briarane diterpenoids from the Chinese gorgonian Junceella fragilis Ridley. Helv. Chim. Acta 2004, 87, 2341–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, S.H.; Zhang, S.; Huang, H.; Xiao, Z.H.; Huang, J.S.; Li, Q.X. New briaranes from the South China Sea gorgonian Junceella juncea. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 1907–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, T.L.; Yeh, S.H.; Leu, Y.L.; Chern, C.Y.; Hsu, H.C. Inhibition of superoxide anion and eastase rlease in human nutrophils by 3′-isopropoxychalcone via a cAMP-dependent pathway. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 148, 78–87. [Google Scholar]
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).