The original chrysophaentins came from one collection of C. taylori made in Round Bay, located on the southern side of St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, in July 2007. From this collection, we identified four asymmetrically linked macrocycles, chrysophaentins A–D (1–4); one linear analog, chrysophaentin E (5); and three symmetrically-linked macrocycles, chrysophaentins F–H (8–10) (Figure 1). The eight chrysophaentins were remarkably similar to one another. All possess an ether linkage between C-1 and C-14′. If present, the second ether linkage was located between either C-14 or C-16 and C-1′, and halogen variability only occurred at C-2 and C-2′. Chrysophaentin H additionally differed in its pentahalogenation, with replacement of the hydrogen at C-12′ with a bromine.

To obtain additional raw material, we returned to St. John in June 2009 and made three collections at Round Bay, Long Bay, and Hawk’s Nest (Figure 2). Each sample was dried and sequentially extracted with hexanes, chloroform, and methanol, and the chrysophaentins were found to be present in the methanol extract. Each methanolic extract from the three new collections plus the original collection were chromatographed by reverse-phase HPLC on a Jupiter Proteo C12 column with a linear gradient of 50–80% methanol in 0.05% TFA-water in fifty minutes. This afforded a chromatographic picture of the chrysophaentins present in each extract (Figure 3). The two collections from Round Bay (Figure 3A,C), separated by two years, were remarkably similar, as was the collection from Long Bay (Figure 3B). However, it was immediately obvious that the methanol extract from Hawk’s Nest (Figure 3D) was different; in fact, it lacked the asymmetrically-linked chrysophaentins A–D. Instead, the linear chrysophaentin E was the most abundant, as well as two newly identified linear chrysophaentins, termed E2 and E3 (Figure 1, compounds 6 and 7). Algae collected from all locations contained the symmetrical chrysophaentins, albeit at much lower abundance relative to compounds A–E.

Previously we determined the structure of acyclic chrysophaentin E (5), which has a molecular formula of C₃₂H₂₆Cl₄O₈ as determined by HR-MS and NMR. Chrysophaentins E2 (6) and E3 (7) were obtained in insufficient quantities for full NMR characterization. However, through analysis of the respective fragmentation patterns observed in the HR-ESI-MS data, we were able to assign structures for each of these new linear chrysophaentins. HR-ESI-MS showed chrysophaentin E2 to possess a molecular formula of C₃₂H₂₆BrCl₃O₈ (m/z 720.9786 [M − H]⁻, calcd for C₃₂H₂₅BrCl₃O₈, 720.9798), and chrysophaentin E3 to possess a molecular formula of C₃₂H₂₆Br₂Cl₂O₈ (m/z 764.9282 [M − H]⁻, calcd for C₃₂H₂₅Br₂Cl₂O₈, 764.9293), indicating that a bromine replaced a chlorine in E2 (6), and two bromines replaced two chlorines in E3 (7), when compared to chrysophaentin E (5). Since positions C-2 and C-2′ were the only sites of halogen variability in the natural chrysophaentins, we reasoned that the dibrominated compound 7 likely contained a bromine at both of these carbons. On the other hand, chrysophaentin E2 must contain bromine at only one of these sites, with chlorine at the other. To identify the respective locations of chlorine and bromine in 6, we compared the mass fragmentation patterns of the three linear analogs (Figure 4). As seen in Figure 4A, the fragmentation pattern for chrysophaentin E showed the successive loss of four chlorine atoms, giving fragment ions with clear isotopic signatures at m/z 641 [M − H − HCl]⁻, 605 [M − H − 2HCl]⁻, 569 [M − H − 3HCl]⁻, and 533 [M − H − 4HCl]⁻. The fragmentation pattern and peak intensities for chrysophaentin E2 (6) was very similar to 5 (Figure 4A and Figure 4B), where successive loss of three chlorines and one bromine gave rise to fragment ions at m/z 685 [M − H − HCl]⁻, 649 [M − H − 2HCl]⁻, 613 [M − H − 3HCl]⁻, and 533 [M − H − HBr − 3HCl]⁻. In contrast, although loss of two bromines and two chlorines was apparent in the mass spectrum for chrysophaentin E3, the major ion for 7 appeared at m/z 395 [M − H − HBr − HCl − C₁₆H₁₄O₃]⁻, which corresponds to the fragment generated from cleavage at the ether bond (Figure 4C). Although MS data on model halogenated biaryl ethers was not available, our data suggest that the presence of bromine ortho to the ether bond is destabilizing as compared to chlorine in the same position, and facilitates cleavage at the ether bond in compound 7. Thus, the nearly identical mass spectral patterns observed for 5 and 6, and the unique fragmentation at the ether bond in the spectrum for 7, allow assignments of the structures of the new linear chrysophaentins E2 and E3, as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 4.

While the extracts from Long Bay and Round Bay afforded more of the asymmetrical chrysophaentins, it became apparent that a synthetic approach to chrysophaentin production was necessary in order to fully examine the biological activity of the structural variants. Accordingly, we devised a convergent synthetic strategy to allow for a total synthesis of the chrysophaentins as well as the investigation of structure-activity relationships. Fragment 12, which, in principle, could be used twice for the assembly of the diether 1, could be constructed by a key Negishi cross-coupling between vinyl iodide 13 and benzylic zinc species 14 (Scheme 1). A chloroiodination of alkyne 15 and a metalation of a halide derived from aldehyde 16 were envisioned to provide access to 13 and 14, respectively. In fact, while some modification of protective groups was required, this strategy could be readily realized.

The commercially available benzoic acid 17 was reduced with lithium aluminumhydride (LAH) to the benzylalcohol 18 (Scheme 2). Bromination [29] and copper-catalyzed substitution with TMS-acetylene magnesium bromide [30] provided the alkyne 20 in 89% overall yield from 17. After desilylation of 20 with tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF), dimethyl resorcinol 15 was subjected to iodochlorination [31,32] in an attempt to generate 13. However, the desired alkyne addition product was formed to a minor extent, and mainly overiodination products were observed. Therefore, we demethylated 15 with boron tribromide and installed the deactivating pivaloyl esters in 82% yield. Iodochlorination of 21 now proceeded in excellent yield to give a 2:1 mixture of alkene isomers 22 and 23. While this ratio could be further improved in favor of the (E)-alkene 22 using solvents other than dichloromethane, yields were considerably lower. Furthermore, we were unable to separate the mixture at this stage, and the clean conversion in dichloromethane allowed us to carry it forward to the coupling step.

Formylation [33,34] of dimethyl hydroquinone 24 provided aldehyde 16, which was reduced to the alcohol 25 and brominated to give 26 in high yield (Scheme 3). Four equivalents of this bromide were then converted to the corresponding zinc reagent. Removal of excess zinc was necessary prior to combination with 22 and 23 and subsequent microwave heating in the presence of palladium acetate. These cross-coupling conditions [35] generated satisfactory yields of the chloroalkenes 11 and 27 in a 2:1 ratio after methanolysis of the pivaloate esters with cesium carbonate and methanol. An analytically pure sample of 11 was obtained by separation with supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC). Boron tribromide was used to cleave the two methyl ethers on 11 to give the tetraphenol 12, which was obtained as the pure (E)-isomer and further purified by preparative supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) before submission to biological testing. In a control experiment, the use of a 2:1 mixture of 11 and 27 in the deprotection reaction led to a 2:1 mixture of 12 and its (Z)-diastereomer, as expected. The assignments of the E/Z-configurations of 12 and its (Z)-diasteromer as well as 22 and 23 were mainly based on the available literature data [31,32].

With the new fragments in hand, we tested whether their potencies were similar to the parent chrysophaentins. A microbroth dilution assay was used to evaluate the antibacterial activity of these compounds, and the minimum inhibitory concentration that led to a 50% decrease in growth (MIC₅₀) was determined using a model curve fit to the data. The MIC₉₀ was determined as the lowest concentration where there was no visible growth, and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was determined as the lowest concentration where a plated aliquot of treated bacteria led to a three logarithmic decrease in colony forming units (CFU) per milliliter relative to the starting inoculum. All compounds were evaluated against three different S. aureus strains from ATCC and two diverse clinical isolates. The strains used in this study included: S. aureus ATCC 25923, a clinical isolate from Seattle, 1945; methicillin-resistant S. aureus ATCC BAA-41, a hospital-acquired strain isolated in New York City in 1994; multidrug-resistant S. aureus (MDRSA) ATCC BAA-44, a hospital-acquired strain isolated in Lisbon, Portugal, with resistance towards ampicillin, methicillin, oxacillin, penicillin, erythromycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, azithromycin, amikacin, clindamycin, cephalothin, ceftriaxone, imipenem, lincomycin, streptomycin, perfloxacin, rifampin, and neomycin [6,36]; S. aureus UAMS-1, a clinical osteomyelitis isolate [37]; and community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus, USA300-LAC [38,39].

C. taylori is a rare marine chrysophyte alga. It was originally discovered in the Dry Tortugas off the southern coast of Florida [40], and has since been found in several locations worldwide. Bioactive natural products have been discovered from collections made in two locations. The Puerto Rico location yielded hormothamnione [41] and 6-desmethoxyhormothamnione [42], while the collections from St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands have yielded the ten chrysophaentins, as well as hormothamnione and 6-methoxyhormothamnione. As we have described here, analysis of methanol extracts revealed geographic variability within the C. taylori collections from St. John. The original collection coming from Round Bay in 2007 yielded chrysophaentins A–H. A second collection at Round Bay two years later contained a similar profile of compounds, indicating temporal stability in the natural compound production at this location. A 2009 collection at Long Bay contained the same eight chrysophaentins in a similar ratio. Both Long Bay and Round Bay are on the southeastern side of the island, and each of these collections was made in shallow protected waters, where the algae were growing on coral sand. The 2009 collection from Hawk’s Nest on the northwestern side of the island yielded a different profile of compounds. It was immediately obvious when comparing the chromatograms that the difference laid in the complete absence of the asymmetrical chrysophaentins in the samples collected at this location. Instead, the most abundant compounds included the acyclic chrysophaentin E, as well as two newly identified linear chrysophaentins, namely chrysophaentins E2 and E3.

Synthetic efforts to obtain a steady supply of chrysophaentin A are under way. An early approach that was employed provided two chrysophaentin fragments that we have shown exhibit similar potencies and spectrum of activity to those of the parent chrysophaentins. Previously, we profiled the anti-staphylococcal activity of several of the natural chrysophaentins towards common laboratory strains of S. aureus. In this study, we sought to expand the structure-activity relationship (SAR) by including the synthetic fragments, and to expand the number and diversity of S. aureus strains. We tested select compounds against five S. aureus strains to measure their potency (MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀) and to determine whether the compounds were bacteriostatic or bactericidal. All chrysophaentins, natural and synthetic, were bacteriostatic at their MIC₉₀; but were bactericidal at concentrations ranging from two to eight fold higher than their respective MIC₉₀s. Furthermore, the synthetic fragments showed similar potency to the acyclic chrysophaentin E (5).

The synthetic fragments fit perfectly into our proposed structure-activity relationship. The tetrachlorinated macrocycle with the asymmetrical linkage between C-16 and C-1′ (chrysophaentin A) was essential for maximum potency. Compounds with an ether bond between C-14 and C-1′, which lead to a symmetrical macrocycle as seen in chrysophaentin F, show a decrease in overall potency. The presence of a fifth halogen at C-12′ did not decrease the antibacterial activity, even when the additional halogen was a bromine, indicating that the atom type at this position or even this ring is not critical to the observed activity. The absence of a macrocyclic structure, as in chrysophaentin E and the synthetic fragments 11 and 12, further decreased antibacterial activity. However, the presence of the asymmetrical macrocycle did not guarantee potency as halogen diversity on the phenyl rings also affected activity. Chrysophaentin D, which contains two bromines in place of the chlorines on the phenol rings in 1, was the least active compound considered in this study.

We have shown that subtle changes to the chrysophaentin structure and composition lead to differences in antibacterial activity. Knowing that the macrocycle is essential for full antibacterial potency, it is not surprising that the synthetic fragments described here have diminished activity compared to the cyclic natural products. However, we were gratified to find that they are indeed antimicrobial and their activities are comparable to the linear chrysophaentins. Their ease of synthesis and antimicrobial activity provide an excellent starting point not only toward the cyclic chrysophaentins, but also for generating more elaborate synthetic analogs.

The biosynthetic pathway leading to production of the chrysophaentins has not been characterized and a genome sequence for any Chrysophaeum species has yet to be published. Interestingly, the most closely related natural products include the marchantins, bazzanins, and chlorinated isoplagiochins, all of which were isolated from different species of liverworts [43]. While these macrocyclic compounds are reminiscent of the chrysophaentins, each family possesses defining structural characteristics that differ relative to one another and to the chrysophaentins. The marchantins [44] are bisbibenzyl ethers whose phenol rings are connected by an ethyl group, and thus far do not contain halogens. The bazzanins [45,46] and chlorinated isoplagiochins [47], on the other hand are chlorinated, but are bisbibenzyls rather than bisbibenzyl ethers. Like the marchantins and all liverwort metabolites, they also contain ethyl linkages. The presence of a butene linkage is unique to the chrysophaentins. While some information is known about the biosynthesis of the liverwort metabolites [48], the pathways are incompletely characterized; moreover, parallels to chrysophaentin biosynthesis cannot be predicted as the producing organisms are not closely related. The lack of biosynthetic information underlines the importance of a synthetic approach that could supply large quantities of the chrysophaentins for further biological studies.

Samples of the marine algae were collected from Round Bay in July 2007, and Long Bay, Round Bay, and Hawk’s Nest in June 2009, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands (Collection permit VIIS-2008-SCI-0034 National Park Service). Each of the alga samples were observed as fluffy, sulfur yellow colonies growing on coarse sand at shallow depths averaging −20 ft. The samples were identified as Chrysophaeum taylori Lewis and Bryan as described previously [27]. Briefly, the presence of clear stalk like structures made up of branching mucilaginous “streamers” of pear shaped, invaginated cells were visible by light microscopy (4–10×) on freshly collected specimens, as well as those preserved in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in sterile sea water immediately after collection.

Lyophilized material was sequentially extracted with hexanes, CH₂Cl₂, and MeOH. The MeOH extract was analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC with an MS detector (Jupiter Proteo C12, 250 × 4.6 mm, 4 µm, DAD at 220 and 280 nm, flow rate 0.5 mL/min) eluting with a linear gradient of 50–80% methanol in 0.05% TFA-water in 50 min.

The MeOH extract was partitioned between n-BuOH–H₂O (1:1), and the organic layer was fractionated on Sephadex LH-20. Fractions containing the unknown chrysophaentins were subjected to HR-ESI-MS and MS in-source fragmentation. High resolution accurate mass data was obtained using a Waters LCT Premiere ESI-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with a Z-Spray electrospray ion source. The instrument was operated in the w-mode at a nominal resolution of 10,000 and an internal standard was used as reference. The ionization mode was negative ion and the ESI capillary voltage was −3000 V and the cone voltage was 30 V. The collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) mass spectra were obtained using a Waters LCT Premiere ESI-TOF mass spectrometer according to the method described by Ren et al. [49] The ion guide 1 voltage was 65 V and the cone voltage was 30 V. The instrument was operated in negative ion mode.

All moisture sensitive reactions were performed using syringe-septum techniques under an atmosphere of either dry N₂ or dry argon unless otherwise noted. All glassware was dried in an oven at 140 °C for a minimum of 6 h or flame-dried under an atmosphere of dry nitrogen prior to use. Reactions carried out at −78 °C employed a CO_2(s)/acetone bath. Et₂O and tetrahydrofuran were dried by distillation over sodium/benzophenone under an argon atmosphere. Dry methylene chloride was purified by filtration through an activated alumina column. All degassed solvents were prepared using the freeze/pump/thaw method (3×). Methanol, acetonitrile, and N,N-dimethylformamide were stored over molecular sieves (3 Å). Deuterated chloroform was stored over anhydrous potassium carbonate. Reactions were monitored by TLC analysis (pre-coated silica gel 60 F₂₅₄ plates, 250 µm layer thickness) and visualized by using UV lamp (254 nm) or by staining with either Vaughn’s reagent (4.8 g of (NH₄)₆Mo₇O₂₄·4H₂O and 0.2 g of Ce(SO₄)₂ in 100 mL of a 3.5 N H₂SO₄) or a potassium permanganate solution (1.5 g of KMnO₄ and 1.5 g of K₂CO₃ in 100 mL of a 0.1% NaOH solution). Flash column chromatography was performed with 40–63 µm silica gel (Silicycle). Microwave reactions were performed on a Biotage Initiator microwave reactor. Infrared spectra were measured on a Smiths Detection IdentifyIR FT-IR spectrometer (ATR). Unless otherwise indicated, all NMR data were collected at room temperature in CDCl₃ or (CD₃)₂CO on a 300, 400, 500, 600, or 700 MHz Bruker instrument. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) with internal CHCl₃ (δ 7.26 ppm for ¹H and 77.00 ppm for ¹³C), or internal acetone (δ 2.05 ppm for ¹H and 29.85 ppm for ¹³C), as the reference. ¹H NMR data are reported as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s = singlet, bs = broad singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet, dd = doublet of doublets, dt = doublet of triplets, td = triplet of doublets, qd = quartet of doublets, sep = septet), integration, and coupling constant(s) (J) in Hertz (Hz).

3,5-Dimethoxy benzyl alcohol (18) [29]. To a stirred suspension of lithium aluminum hydride (13.1 g, 329 mmol, 2 equiv) in dry THF (400 mL) at 0 °C was added a solution of 3,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid (30.0 g, 164 mmol, 1 equiv) in dry THF (400 mL) over 45 min. Upon completion of the addition, the reaction mixture was diluted with THF (300 mL), warmed to rt, stirred for 5 h, and slowly quenched with a saturated aqueous solution of Na/K tartrate. The resulting biphasic mixture was stirred at r.t. for 1 h, the organic layer was separated, the remaining aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (×2), and the combined organic layers were dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to give 27.0 g (97%) of 18 as a colorless oil: Rf 0.33 (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:2); IR (CDCl₃) 3390, 2937, 1594, 1456, 1428, 1318, 1294, 1202, 1146, 1057, 829 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_H 6.45 (d, 2 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 6.32 (d, 1 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 4.50 (d, 2 H, J = 5.4 Hz), 3.71 (s, 6 H), 3.49 (t, 1 H, J = 5.4 Hz); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 160.5, 143.3, 104.2, 99.2, 64.5, 55.0.

3,5-Dimethoxybenzyl bromide (19) [29]. To a stirred solution of 18 (17.5 g, 104 mmol, 1 equiv) in CH₂Cl₂ (500 mL) at 0 °C was added dropwise PBr₃ (12.1 mL, 125 mmol, 1.2 equiv). The reaction mixture was slowly warmed to rt, stirred for 3 h, quenched with a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO₃, and stirred at r.t. for 1 h. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et₂O. The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to give 22.2 g (92%) of 19 as a white solid: Rf 0.75 (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:2); IR (CDCl₃) 2999, 2954, 1596, 1458, 1428, 1345, 1323, 1297, 1204, 1152, 1062, 930 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_H 6.54 (d, 2 H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.39 (d, 1 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 4.42 (s, 2 H), 3.80 (s, 6 H); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 160.9, 139.7, 107.0, 100.6, 55.4, 33.6; HRMS (ESI⁺) m/z calcd for C₉H₁₂O₂Br 231.0021, found 231.0038.

(3-(3,5-Dimethoxyphenyl)prop-1-ynyl)trimethylsilane (20). To a stirred solution of ethynyl trimethysilane (39.1 mL, 277 mmol, 4 equiv) in THF (120 mL) at 0 °C was added ethylmagnesium bromide (3.16 M in Et₂O; 87.6 mL, 277 mmol, 4 equiv). The reaction was warmed to rt, stirred for 30 min, and CuBr (9.93 g, 69.2 mmol, 1 equiv) was added. The reaction was stirred at r.t. for 15 min, 3,5-dimethoxybenzyl bromide (19, 16.0 g, 69.2 mmol, 1 equiv) was added, the resulting mixture was heated to 66 °C, and stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et₂O, slowly quenched with brine, and extracted with Et₂O (×2). The combined organic layers were washed with a saturated aqueous solution of NH₄Cl, brine, dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was purified by chromatography on SiO₂ (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:10) to give 17.2 g (100%) of 20 as a pale yellow oil: Rf 0.41 (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:20); IR (neat) 2956, 2898, 2175, 1754, 1596, 1459, 1428, 1204, 1156, 1122, 1101, 839 cm^-1; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_H 6.53 (d, 2 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 6.34 (t, 1 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 3.79 (s, 6 H), 3.60 (s, 2 H), 0.19 (s, 9 H); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 160.8, 138.7, 105.9, 104.0, 98.7, 87.1, 55.3, 26.3, 0.1; HRMS (ESI⁺) m/z calcd for C₁₄H₂₁O₂Si 249.1311, found 249.1287.

1,3-Dimethoxy-5-(prop-2-ynyl)benzene (15). To a stirred solution of 20 (5.37 g, 21.6 mmol, 1 equiv) and AcOH (4.99 mL, 86.5 mmol, 4 equiv) in THF (100 mL) was added dropwise TBAF (1 M in THF; 86.5 mL, 86.5 mmol, 4 equiv). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 24 h, diluted with Et₂O, washed with brine (×2), dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was purified by chromatography on SiO₂ (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:10) to give 3.85 g (100%) of 15 as a colorless oil: Rf 0.36 (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:10); IR (CDCl₃) 3286, 2999, 2954, 1593, 1457, 1428, 1344, 1323, 1288, 1204, 1154, 1064, 827; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_H 6.53 (d, 2 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 6.35 (t, 1 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 3.79 (s, 6 H), 3.56 (d, 2 H, J = 2.8 Hz), 2.20 (t, 1 H, J = 2.8 Hz); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 160.9, 138.3, 105.9, 98.7, 81.7, 70.6, 55.3, 25.0; HRMS (EI⁺) m/z calcd for C₁₁H₁₂O₂ 176.0837, found 176.0834.

5-(Prop-2-ynyl)-1,3-phenylene bis(2,2-dimethylpropanoate (21). To a stirred solution of 15 (6.50 g, 36.9 mmol, 1 equiv) in CH₂Cl₂ (1200 mL) at 0 °C was added BBr₃ (1 M in CH₂Cl₂; 92.2 mL, 92.2 mmol, 5 equiv) over 1 h via an addition funnel. The reaction mixture was warmed to r.t. and stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was slowly quenched with a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO₃ (500 mL) and stirred at r.t. for 4 h. The solution was acidified with HCl, extracted with CH₂Cl₂ and EtOAc, and the combined organic layers were dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (180 mL), and triethylamine (20.9 mL, 148 mmol, 4 equiv) and PivCl (11.6 mL, 92.2 mmol, 2.5 equiv) were added. The resulting solution was stirred at r.t. for 90 min, diluted with brine, the organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was purified by chromatography on SiO₂ (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:10) to give 9.6 g (82%) of 21 as a colorless oil: Rf 0.85 (EtOAc/hexanes, 3:7); IR (neat) 3293, 2973, 1806, 1750, 1414, 1452, 1396, 1366, 1269, 1118, 1098, 1031, 1003 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_H 6.95 (d, 2 H, J = 1.8 Hz), 6.76 (t, 1 H, J = 1.8 Hz), 3.61 (d, 2 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 2.21 (t, 1 H, J = 2.4 Hz); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 176.6, 151.5, 138.3, 118.3, 113.8, 80.7, 71.2, 39.1, 27.1, 24.5; HRMS (EI⁺) m/z calcd for C₁₉H₂₄O₄ 316.1675, found 316.1670.

4-Chloro-2,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (16) [33,34]. To a stirred solution of 2-chloro-1,4-dimethoxybenzene (25.0 g, 0.145 mol, 1 equiv) and hexamethylene tetramine (20.5 g, 0.145 mol, 1 equiv) at r.t. was carefully added TFA (250 mL). The resulting yellow suspension was heated to 95 °C, stirred for 5 h, and the hot brown solution was poured into a 2 L Erlenmeyer flask containing approximately 250 g of crushed ice. To the vigorously stirred mixture was slowly added solid NaHCO₃ (243 g, 2.90 mol, 20 equiv) in 5–10 g portions over two hours. The resulting yellow precipitate was filtered through a pad of celite, washed with water, and dissolved in Et₂O. The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to yield 29.0 g (100%) of 16 as an off-white solid: Rf 0.70 (EtOAc/hexanes, 3:7); IR (neat) 2941, 2874, 1664, 1601, 1575, 1497, 1478, 1461, 1389, 1269, 1213, 1023, 977 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_H 10.35 (s, 1 H), 7.33 (s, 1 H), 7.03 (s, 1 H), 3.87 (s, 6 H); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 188.4, 156.1, 149.4, 130.4, 123.4, 114.5, 109.9, 56.5, 56.3; HRMS (EI⁺) m/z calcd for C₉H₉O₃Cl 200.0240, found 200.0238.

(4-Chloro-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)methanol (25). To a stirred solution of 16 (29.0 g, 145 mmol, 1 equiv) in absolute ethanol (550 mL) was added sodium borohydride (27.3 g, 723 mmol, 5 equiv). The reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 6 h, quenched via dropwise addition of acetone, diluted with EtOAc, washed with brine (×2), dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by chromatography on SiO₂ (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:1) to give 28.0 g (96%) of 25 as a white solid: mp 89–90 °C; Rf 0.53 (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:1); IR (neat) 3258, 2958, 2915, 1495, 1461, 1392, 1204, 1061, 719 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_H 6.90 (s, 1 H), 6.80 (s, 1 H), 4.55 (d, 2 H, J = 4.2 Hz), 3.77 (s, 3 H), 3.71 (s, 3 H), 3.10 (bs, 1 H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 150.6, 148.7, 128.4, 120.8, 112.5, 112.4, 60.3, 56.5, 55.6; HRMS (ESI⁺) m/z calcd for C₉H₁₂O₃Cl 203.0475, found 203.0465.

1-(Bromomethyl)-4-chloro-2,5-dimethoxybenzene (26) [50]. To a stirred solution of 25 (5.00 g, 24.7 mmol, 1 equiv) in CH₂Cl₂ (125 mL) at 0 °C was added dropwise HBr (47–49% aqueous solution; 4.13 mL, 74.0 mmol, 3 equiv). The resulting solution was slowly warmed to r.t. and stirred overnight. The following morning a second batch of HBr (47–49% solution; 4.13 mL, 74.0 mmol, 3 equiv) was added to the reaction mixture, which was stirred at r.t. for an additional 4 h, extracted with Et₂O (×2), washed with water, a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO₃, brine, dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to give 6.55 g (100%) of 26 as a white solid: Rf 0.31 (EtOAc/hexanes, 3:7); IR (neat) 2962, 2947, 2844, 1732, 1582, 1495, 1458, 1443, 1389, 1301, 1204, 1182, 1033, 882 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_H 6.91–6.90 (m, 2 H), 4.50 (s, 2 H), 3.84 (s, 3 H), 3.82 (s, 3 H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 151.3, 148.9, 125.1, 123.2, 114.6, 113.6, 56.6, 56.2, 28.2.

(E)-5-(2-Chloro-3-iodoallyl)-1,3-phenylene bis(2,2-dimethylpropanoate (22) and (Z)-5-(2-Chloro-3-iodoallyl)-1,3-phenylene bis(2,2-dimethylpropanoate (23). To a stirred solution of 21 (9.50 g, 30.0 mmol, 1 equiv) in dry CH₂Cl₂ (150 mL) at 0 °C was added ICl (1 M in CH₂Cl₂; 30.0 mL, 30.0 mmol, 1 equiv). The reaction mixture was warmed to rt, stirred protected from light (enclosed in aluminum foil) for 3 h, diluted with Et₂O, washed with Na₂SO₄ (×2), brine, dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was purified by chromatography on SiO₂ (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:10) to give an inseparable 2:1 mixture of 22 and 23 (13.7 g, 95%) as a colorless oil: Rf 0.54 (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:10); IR (neat) 3277, 2934, 2872, 1746, 1592, 1497, 1461, 1409, 1269, 1207, 1122, 1103, 1032, 975, 723 cm⁻¹; HRMS (ESI⁺) m/z calcd for C₁₉H₂₄O₄NaClI 501.0306, found 501.0308. Characteristic data for the major, desired isomer 22: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_H 6.87 (d, 2 H, J = 1.5 Hz), 6.80 (t, 1 H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.62 (s, 1 H), 3.90 (s, 2 H), 1.35 (s, 18 H); ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 176.6, 151.6, 137.9, 135.6, 119.0, 114.2, 74.8, 44.2, 39.1, 27.1. Characteristic signals for 23: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_H 7.06 (s, 1 H), 3.92 (s, 2 H).

(E)-5-(2-Chloro-4-(4-chloro-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)but-2-enyl)benzene-1,3-diol (11). A flame-dried microwave vial was charged with a 2:1 mixture of 22 and 23 (0.520 g, 1.08 mmol, 1 equiv), Pd(OAc)₂ (0.0122 g, 0.0543 mmol, 0.05 equiv), P(o-tol)₃ (0.0341 g (0.109 mmol, 0.1 equiv), and freshly distilled, dry, degassed DMF (0.8 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 10 min. In a separate dry flask, a catalytic amount of iodine (~20 mg) and zinc (0.362 g, 5.43 mmol, 5 equiv) were heated (bunsen burner) until a purple gas coated the interior of the flask. The flask was cooled to rt, charged with distilled, dry, degassed DMF (1 mL), and benzyl bromide 26 (1.15 g, 4.34 mmol, 4 equiv). The mixture was allowed to stir at r.t. under argon for 6 min. The activated organozinc reagent was filtered through an oven dried fritted funnel under an atmosphere of argon and cannulated into the stirred solution of 22 and 23. The resulting solution was heated in a microwave reactor (2 min, 120 °C), treated with a second batch of Pd(OAc)₂ (0.0122 g, 0.0543 mmol, 0.05 equiv) and resubjected to the microwave conditions (2 min, 120 °C). The crude reaction mixture was directly purified by chromatography on SiO₂ (EtOAc/hexanes, 1:20) to give a crude yellow oil which was immediately dissolved in MeOH/CH₂Cl₂ (4 mL, 2:1), and Cs₂CO₃ (1.67 g, 5.08 mmol, 5 equiv) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 6 h, diluted with EtOAc, and acidified with conc. HCl. The organic layer was separated, and the acidified aqueous solution was extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was purified by chromatography on SiO₂ (chloroform/acetone, 8:2) to give a 2:1 mixture of 11 and the undesired regioisomer 27 (0.192 g, 51%) as a yellow oil. Characteristic signals for 27: ¹H NMR (600 MHz (CD₃)₂CO) δ_H 8.20 (bs, 2 H), 7.02 (d, 2 H, J = 3.6 Hz), 6.45 (t, 1 H, J = 7.8 Hz), 6.26 (s, 3 H), 3.84 (app s, 5 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 3.50 (d, 2 H, J = 7.8 Hz); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 159.5, 152.3, 150.0, 141.5, 140.7, 127.7, 120.9, 115.6, 113.8, 108.1, 101.9, 101.7, 56.9, 56.5, 45.1.

An analytically pure sample of 11 for biological evaluation and characterization was obtained via SFC chromatography using a semiprep (250 × 10 mm) silica column (Rt 5.80 min, 10 mL/min, 15% methanol, 220 nm detection): Rf 0.48 (acetone/chloroform, 2:8); IR (acetone) 3375, 3001, 2952, 1696, 1599, 1495, 1463, 1387, 1212, 1156, 1034, 1010 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (600 MHz (CD₃)₂CO) δ_H 8.18 (bs, 2 H), 7.02 (s, 1 H), 6.99 (s, 1 H), 6.30 (s, 2 H), 6.25 (s, 1 H), 5.88 (t, 1 H, J = 7.8 Hz), 3.84 (s, 3 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 3.73 (s, 2 H), 3.51 (d, 2 H, J = 7.8 Hz); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 159.5, 152.3, 150.0, 140.6, 133.7, 128.1, 128.1, 120.8, 115.5, 113.8, 108.0, 101.8, 56.9, 56.5, 40.2, 29.5; HRMS (ES⁻) [M + Cl]⁻ m/z calcd for C₁₈H₁₈O₄Cl₃ 403.0271, found 403.0295.

(E)-5-(2-Chloro-4-(4-chloro-2,5-dihydroxyphenyl)but-2-enyl)benzene-1,3-diol (12). A stirred solution of 11 (0.0500 g, 0.135 mmol, 1 equiv) in CH₂Cl₂ (7 mL) was enclosed in aluminum foil and cooled to 0 °C. To the stirred solution was added dropwise BBr₃ (1 M in CH₂Cl₂; 0.677 mL, 0.677 mmol, 5 equiv). The resulting solution was slowly warmed to r.t. and stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was quenched with a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO₃ (8 mL) and stirred at r.t. for an additional hour. The solution was acidified with HCl, extracted with EtOAc (×2) and the combined organic layers were dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by chromatography on SiO₂ (chloroform/acetone, 3:1) to give 12 (0.0462 g, 96%) as a slightly yellow film. Before submission for biological testing, a sample of 12 was further purified via SFC chromatography using a semiprep (250 × 10 mm) silica column (Rt 4.68 min, 8 mL/min, 25% methanol, 220 nm detection): Rf 0.15 (acetone/chloroform, 2:8); IR (neat) 3343, 1692, 1599, 1495, 1417, 1329, 1184, 1143, 1005, 822 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (600 MHz (CD₃)₂CO) δ_H 8.17 (bs, 4 H), 6.86 (s, 1 H), 6.84 (s, 1 H), 6.29 (d, 2 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 6.24 (t, 1 H, J = 2.4 Hz), 5.89 (t, 1 H, J = 7.8 Hz), 3.69 (s, 2 H), 3.47 (d, 2 H, J = 7.8 Hz); ¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ_C 159.5, 149.0, 146.9, 140.5, 133.8, 128.0, 127.0, 118.5 (2C), 116.7, 108.0, 101.8, 40.2, 29.5; HRMS (ES⁻) [2M − H]⁻ m/z calcd for C₃₂H₂₇O₈Cl₄ 679.0460, found 679.0482.

The demethylation reaction was also performed on a 2:1 mixture of 11 and 27, resulting in a 2:1 mixture of 12 and its (Z)-diastereomer. Characteristic signals for the (Z)-diastereomer: ¹H NMR (400 MHz (CD₃)₂CO) δ_H 6.85 (s, 1 H), 6.48 (t, 1 H, J = 7.6 Hz), 3.81 (s, 2 H), 3.46 (d, 2 H, J = 7.6 Hz).

Microbroth dilution assays were performed as described in the CLSI guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀) were determined using 96-well microbroth dilution assays. Antimicrobial activity of pure compounds or antibiotic standards were tested by adding serial dilutions to wells containing Mueller Hinton II broth. An overnight growth of S. aureus ATCC 25923, MRSA ATCC BAA-41, MDRSA BAA-44, S. aureus UAMS-1, and CA-MRSA USA300-LAC was diluted in Mueller-Hinton II broth and added to the wells to a final concentration of 5 × 10⁵ colony forming units (CFU) per milliliter. Plates were incubated for 18 h at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm. Absorbance at 600 nm is read on a Molecular Devices plate reader. Growth curves are plotted, and curves were fit to a one-site model using the equation y = 100/[1 + (concentration/MIC₅₀)], where MIC₅₀ is the concentration at which the growth of bacterial cultures are reduced by 50%. MIC₉₀ values were visually calculated by determining the lowest concentration of test compound that allowed no visible growth (no difference of absorption between treated samples and blank controls).

Bacteriostatic (BS) or bactericidal (BC) properties were determined by plating onto a fresh TSA plate an aliquot from each well that showed no visible growth starting at the MIC₉₀. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, and colonies were counted. Bactericidal concentrations were defined as those that resulted in a three logarithmic decrease in the number of viable bacteria relative to the starting inoculum, and the lowest bactericidal concentration was defined as the MBC.