Next Article in Journal
High Sensitivity MEMS Strain Sensor: Design and Simulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Deployment of a Prototype Plant GFP Imager at the Arthur Clarke Mars Greenhouse of the Haughton Mars Project
Previous Article in Journal
Temporal Variability Corrections for Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer E (AMSR-E) Surface Soil Moisture: Case Study in Little River Region, Georgia, U.S.
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transgenic Plants as Sensors of Environmental Pollution Genotoxicity
Sensors 2008, 8(4), 2628-2641; doi:10.3390/s8042628

Pathogen Phytosensing: Plants to Report Plant Pathogens

1,* , 1
Jr. 1
Received: 28 February 2008 / Accepted: 11 April 2008 / Published: 14 April 2008
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phytosensors: Environmental Sensing with Plants and Plant Cells)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [532 KB, uploaded 21 June 2014]   |   Browse Figures


Real-time systems that provide evidence of pathogen contamination in crops can be an important new line of early defense in agricultural centers. Plants possess defense mechanisms to protect against pathogen attack. Inducible plant defense is controlled by signal transduction pathways, inducible promoters and cis-regulatory elements corresponding to key genes involved in defense, and pathogen-specific responses. Identified inducible promoters and cis-acting elements could be utilized in plant sentinels, or ‘phytosensors’, by fusing these to reporter genes to produce plants with altered phenotypes in response to the presence of pathogens. Here, we have employed cis-acting elements from promoter regions of pathogen inducible genes as well as those responsive to the plant defense signal molecules salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene. Synthetic promoters were constructed by combining various regulatory elements supplemented with the enhancer elements from the Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter to increase basal level of the GUS expression. The inducibility of each synthetic promoter was first assessed in transient expression assays using Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts and then examined for efficacy in stably transgenic Arabidopsis and tobacco plants. Histochemical and fluorometric GUS expression analyses showed that both transgenic Arabidopsis and tobacco plants responded to elicitor and phytohormone treatments with increased GUS expression when compared to untreated plants. Pathogen-inducible phytosensor studies were initiated by analyzing the sensitivity of the synthetic promoters against virus infection. Transgenic tobacco plants infected with Alfalfa mosaic virus showed an increase in GUS expression when compared to mock-inoculated control plants, whereas Tobacco mosaic virus infection caused no changes in GUS expression. Further research, using these transgenic plants against a range of different pathogens with the regulation of detectable reporter gene could provide biological evidence to define the functional differences between pathogens, and provide new technology and applications for transgenic plants as phytosensors.
Keywords: cis-regulatory elements; synthetic promoters; defense signaling; GUS reporter; protoplast transfection; transgenic plants; pathogen infection cis-regulatory elements; synthetic promoters; defense signaling; GUS reporter; protoplast transfection; transgenic plants; pathogen infection
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share & Cite This Article

Further Mendeley | CiteULike
Export to BibTeX |
MDPI and ACS Style

Mazarei, M.; Teplova, I.; Hajimorad, M.R.; Stewart, C.N., Jr. Pathogen Phytosensing: Plants to Report Plant Pathogens. Sensors 2008, 8, 2628-2641.

View more citation formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

For more information on the journal, click here


Cited By

[Return to top]
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert