Next Article in Journal
Aldehyde Dehydrogenases Expression in Corneal Epithelial Cells with Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
Next Article in Special Issue
Linear and Circular Long Non-Coding RNAs in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: From Pathogenesis to Classification and Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Fetuin-A Promotes 3-Dimensional Growth in LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells by Sequestering Extracellular Vesicles to Their Surfaces to Act as Signaling Platforms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms23074019
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lineage Conversion in Pediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Leukemia under Blinatumomab Therapy

by
Alexandra Semchenkova
1,
Ekaterina Mikhailova
1,
Alexander Komkov
1,2,
Marina Gaskova
1,
Ruslan Abasov
1,
Evgenii Matveev
1,3,
Marat Kazanov
1,3,4,
Ilgar Mamedov
1,2,
Anna Shmitko
5,
Vera Belova
5,
Anna Miroshnichenkova
1,
Olga Illarionova
1,
Yulia Olshanskaya
1,
Grigory Tsaur
6,7,
Tatiana Verzhbitskaya
6,7,
Natalia Ponomareva
8,
Gleb Bronin
9,
Konstantin Kondratchik
9,
Larisa Fechina
6,7,
Yulia Diakonova
1,
Liudmila Vavilova
1,
Natalia Myakova
1,
Galina Novichkova
1,
Alexey Maschan
1,
Michael Maschan
1,
Elena Zerkalenkova
1 and
Alexander Popov
1,*add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 117998 Moscow, Russia
2
Department of Genomics of Adaptive Immunity, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117998 Moscow, Russia
3
Institute for Information Transmission Problems (the Kharkevich Institute, RAS), 127051 Moscow, Russia
4
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 121205 Moscow, Russia
5
Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 119334 Moscow, Russia
6
Regional Clinical Children Hospital, 620149 Ekaterinburg, Russia
7
Research Institute of Medical Cell Technologies, 620026 Ekaterinburg, Russia
8
Russian Children Clinical Hospital, 119571 Moscow, Russia
9
Morozov City Children Clinical Hospital, 119049 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(7), 4019; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23074019
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 24 March 2022 / Accepted: 2 April 2022 / Published: 5 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We report incidence and deep molecular characteristics of lineage switch in 182 pediatric patients affected by B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), who were treated with blinatumomab. We documented six cases of lineage switch that occurred after or during blinatumomab exposure. Therefore, lineage conversion was found in 17.4% of all resistance cases (4/27) and 3.2% of relapses (2/63). Half of patients switched completely from BCP-ALL to CD19-negative acute myeloid leukemia, others retained CD19-positive B-blasts and acquired an additional CD19-negative blast population: myeloid or unclassifiable. Five patients had KMT2A gene rearrangements; one had TCF3::ZNF384 translocation. The presented cases showed consistency of gene rearrangements and fusion transcripts across initially diagnosed leukemia and lineage switch. In two of six patients, the clonal architecture assessed by IG/TR gene rearrangements was stable, while in others, loss of clones or gain of new clones was noted. KMT2A-r patients demonstrated very few additional mutations, while in the TCF3::ZNF384 case, lineage switch was accompanied by a large set of additional mutations. The immunophenotype of an existing leukemia sometimes changes via different mechanisms and with different additional molecular changes. Careful investigation of all BM compartments together with all molecular –minimal residual disease studies can lead to reliable identification of lineage switch.

1. Introduction

In acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the advent of immunotherapy, a form of treatment aimed at activating the immune system against tumor cells, has greatly expanded the list of effective medical options. Primarily, immunotherapy has been beneficial for the treatment of patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) forms of disease. Blinatumomab is among the most studied and well-known immunotherapies approved for use in patients with R/R B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) [1,2,3,4]. This medication is a first-in-class bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) that recruits and stimulates cytotoxic T cells to eliminate cells of B-lineage origin [5]. Its design allows the simultaneous targeting of CD3 (a T-cell antigen) and CD19, a molecule highly expressed on leukemic and normal B cells. The safety and efficacy of blinatumomab in children and adults with R/R BCP-ALL have been demonstrated in a few international clinical trials [2,3,4,6,7].
However, a notable number of patients treated with blinatumomab still experience disease recurrence [2,3]. Up to 20% of post-blinatumomab relapses are characterized by loss of the targeted B-cell antigen CD19 from leukemic cells [6,8,9]. Some CD19-negative relapses are accompanied by loss of all B-lineage antigens and acquisition of a distinct myeloid immunophenotype [10,11]. This phenomenon is known as “lineage switch” and is not limited strictly to the immunotherapy field. Lineage switch was first observed during disease relapse after standard chemotherapy [12]; however, the widespread implementation of immunotherapy has led to an increase in the number of reports [13,14,15,16,17,18]. As previously reported, any significant change in antigen expression within leukemic or normal cells becomes an obstacle for proper immunophenotypic monitoring of MRD [9]. Understanding the potential pitfalls and limitations associated with targeted therapy can facilitate early detection of relapse during disease monitoring.
In this study, we report incidence of lineage switch in pediatric patients who were treated with blinatumomab after failure of or resistance to standard chemotherapy. Herein, we present data from immunophenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular studies before and at the time of lineage switch. Given these findings, we also propose recommendations for disease monitoring in the setting of treatment with blinatumomab or other targeted therapies.

2. Results

2.1. General Treatment Information and Outcomes

We documented six cases of lineage switch that occurred after (n = 2) or during (n = 4) blinatumomab exposure in six pediatric patients affected by BCP-ALL (median age 2 years, range 14 days–12 years). Therefore, lineage conversion after selective pressure on CD19-positive cells was found in 17.4% of all resistance cases (4 of 27) and 3.2% of relapses (2 of 63). All patients were initially diagnosed with BCP-ALL according to morphological, cytochemical, and immunophenotypic evaluation of BM aspirates [19]. The results of the initial diagnostic investigations are summarized in Table S1. In the presented cases, blinatumomab was initiated because of relapse development in three patients (pts #2, #3, and #5); failure to achieve response after first-line therapy in one patient (pt #4), and MRD reappearance during second (pt #1) or first (pt #6) remission in the remaining patients. Two patients completed one blinatumomab course (pts #2 and #3), and one patient received two complete courses (pt #1). In three patients, the blinatumomab course was interrupted by lineage switch (pts #4, #5, and #6). The overall treatment history of the patients is presented in Table 1.
A brief summary of the laboratory findings is given in Table 2.

2.2. Immunophenotypic Findings

Based on the criteria of The European Group for the Immunological Classification of Leukemias (EGIL) [20], primary immunophenotypic studies identified BI-ALL in five patients (pts #1, #2, #3, #4, and #6) and BIII-ALL in one patient (pt #5). CD33 and NG2 were among the most common coexpressed markers (Table S1).
During post-blinatumomab lineage conversion, three patients (pts #1, #5, #6) switched completely from BCP-ALL to CD19-negative AML. In patient #1, 0.18% of cells were leukemic B-lineage blasts (CD19+CD10-CD45dimCD34+/-) on Day +90 after HSCT. These cells disappeared after the blinatumomab treatment course. Six months later, myeloid cells (CD19-iCD79a-iCD22-CD33+CD117+CD56+CD11c-/+) accounted for 16% of BM cells (Figure 1). FLAM block (FLAG with addition of mitoxantrone [21] but without G-CFS) with a subsequent second related HCST induced continuous complete remission. In patient #5, the previous BCP-ALL cells (CD19+iCD79a+CD10-/+CD34-CD45dim, 38.6% in BM prior to blinatumomab) had been completely replaced by myeloid leukemic cells (CD19-iCD79a-iCD22-CD33+CD117+CD34-CD14-CD11c+) by Day 27 of the blinatumomab course. These cells were resistant to all therapies attempting to decrease the leukemic burden. In patient #6, who received blinatumomab due to reappearance of B-lineage MRD three months after allo-HSCT, 5.0% of BM cells were found to be myeloid blasts (CD19-iCD79a-iCD22-CD33+CD117+CD64+CD7+) on the 22nd day of the immunotherapy course. In two weeks, their proportion increased to 75%. Due to high expression of CD38 on all leukemic cells, application of daratumumab induced MRD negativity.
Three other patients retained CD19-positive B-lineage blasts and acquired an additional CD19-negative blast population: myeloid (pts #2 and #4) or unclassifiable (pt #3). The median time between blinatumomab initiation and lineage switch was 31 days (range 20–207 days).
Two patients (pts #2 and #4) showed coexistence of two leukemic populations before the blinatumomab course. In patient #2, the main B-lineage leukemic population (15.2%) (CD19+ iCD79a+iCD22+CD10-CD45-CD34+/-CD33+/-) was accompanied by a small population of myeloid blast cells (3%) (CD33+CD19-iCD79a-iCD22-CD45+CD34-CD14-) at the time of the second post-chemotherapy relapse (Figure 2). Because of this finding, patient #2 received a high-risk chemotherapy block, which resulted in clearance of the myeloid blasts and a decrease in the B-lineage blasts to 1.5%. In one week, the proportion of the B-lineage blasts increased to 25%, but no myeloid blasts were present. Immediately after a short course of dexamethasone, patient #2 received blinatumomab. On Day 35 after blinatumomab initiation, the myeloid blasts reappeared, and their proportion exceeded that of the B-lineage blasts (CD19+) (20% versus 2%) (Figure 2). Further salvage chemotherapy was complicated by tumor lysis syndrome and acute renal failure. As a result, the patient died from treatment complications.
In patient #4, a population of myeloid blasts (CD45dimCD19-CD14+CD64+CD33+) was first observed during first-line chemotherapy. The patient showed no therapy response and retained a high MRD level. During the regular follow-up assessment, immunophenotypic evaluation revealed 4% myeloid blasts in addition to the initial B-lineage leukemic population (10.8%). The blinatumomab course was initiated four days later. On Day 22 of the course, the myeloid population increased to 83%, while the B-cell population (CD19+) was 4.3%. As all treatment options were exhausted, patient #4 was transferred to palliative care. Nine days after the lineage switch, the patient died.
Pt #3 had received blinatumomab due to BCP-ALL relapse (CD19+ iCD79a+iCD22+CD10-CD34-CD33+CD45dim) as the bridge therapy to allo-HSCT. Reappearance of CD19-positive MRD (1.3%) was noted at Day +100 after transplantation. After receiving chemotherapy including dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide, the leukemic burden increased to 22%. Simultaneously, an additional population of leukemic blasts (44%) with undifferentiated morphologic features and the absence of lineage-specific markers (including CD19) was found in the BM (Figure 3). Due to sample availability, the next time point, at which time these unclassifiable cells were completely predominant (Figure S1), was used for molecular studies. Subsequent therapy including CD19/CD22-directed CAR-T cells and second allo-HSCT failed to prevent CD19-positive BCP-ALL relapse, although an unclassifiable subpopulation of leukemic cells was successfully eliminated from the BM (Figure S1).

2.3. Cytogenetic Findings

According to initial cytogenetic and molecular diagnostics, five out of six patients carried KMT2A gene rearrangements, including t(4;11)(q21.3-q22.1;q23.3) (pts #1, #4, and #6) and t(11;19)(q23.3;p13.3) (pts #3 and #5). A DNA study with a custom KMT2A-targeted NGS panel revealed breakpoint junctions of forward (pts #1 and #3-#6) and reciprocal (pts #3-#6) fusion genes. KMT2A::AFF1 and KMT2A::MLLT1 fusion transcripts were shown to be expressed unambiguously in the corresponding RNA samples. One out of six patients had a normal karyotype with TCF3 rearrangement with partial deletion and ZNF384 rearrangement, as shown by FISH (pt #2). Cryptic t(12;19)(p13;p13)/TCF3::ZNF384 was found by RNA-seq (Figure S2) and exome sequencing. Breakpoint junctions at both the DNA and RNA levels were validated with Sanger sequencing and submitted to the GenBank database; the accession numbers are summarized in Table S2.
All patients demonstrated consistency in the main translocations across the initial and relapsed samples, as confirmed by conventional cytogenetics and FISH studies (Table 2, Figure S3). Patients #4 and #6 acquired additional chromosomal abnormalities in AML cells; however, t(4;11)(q21.3-q22.1;q23.3) was preserved (Table 2, Figure S3).
Further confirmation of the identical nature of the main translocations in the initial BCP-ALL and relapsed AML or ALAL samples of the studied patients was achieved at the molecular level. DNA breakpoint junctions in both KMT2A-rearranged and TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL/AML pairs were Sanger-sequenced using patient-specific primers (Table S3) and were shown to be identical (Figure 4). Additional studies of reciprocal fusion genes (where available) and fusion transcripts are summarized in Figures S5 and S6, respectively.

2.4. Additional Mutations Identified by Exome Sequencing

Whole-exome sequencing was performed on paired prior/post blinatumomab treatment sample pairs to determine whether the phenotype switch contributed to the acquisition of additional pathogenic mutations in genes relevant for myeloid neoplasm development. Overall, the KMT2A-rearranged samples demonstrated a relatively uneventful mutational landscape with a median of 6.4 nonsynonymous exonic deleterious variants in initial samples and 8.5 variants in relapse samples (Table S4). However, we observed four distinct patterns of the distribution of additional events in this group. Pattern 1 exhibited no significant pathogenic variants, either initially or in relapse samples (pts #1 and #3). Pattern 2 (pt #5) included the appearance of a myeloid-associated pathogenic variant (CBL p.Y371C) in the relapse sample. Notably, this mutation had a high variant allele frequency (94.87%), which indicates loss of heterozygosity in this region typical of myeloid neoplasms. Pattern 3 included shared additional pathogenic mutations between initial and relapse samples (pt #4—KRAS p.G12D, pt #5—KRAS p.G13D). Pattern 4 was exhibited by patient #5, who developed AML relapse with the hypermutator phenotype with a total of 29 nonsynonymous deleterious exonic variants, including 2 pathogenic mutations in the TP53 gene (TP53 p.R89Q, TP53 p.R16H;). Additional pathogenic mutations in lineage-switched patients are summarized in Table 2; the overall mutational landscape is presented in Table S4.

2.5. Clonality Assessment by Next-Generation Sequencing

We performed comparative BCR/TCR clonality analysis of paired samples before and after lineage switch for all six patients (12 samples total). Approximately 17,000 genome equivalents (100 ng of gDNA) for each sample were input into the clonality assay and sequenced with an average ~600,000-read coverage per sample. We detected clonal TCR/BCR markers specific for leukemic clones in all 12 analyzed samples (Table 3). The identified clonal rearrangements belonged to both the BCR and TCR gene families, except TRA. The detected clonal rates ranged between 10% and 99% (a portion of reads covered unique rearrangements among particular BCR/TCR gene families). The number of markers varied from 1 to 8 per sample. We observed three patterns of leukemic clone behavior in the analyzed pairs: clone persistence (pts #2, #3, #5, and #6), clone loss (pts #1, #4, and #5), and appearance of new clones (pts #1, #3, and #4) (Table 2 and Table 3). These patterns existed individually or in different combinations, providing a relatively wide variety of clonal evolution ways for leukemic cells. However, we did not observe any associations between clonal evolution features and time from blinatumomab therapy start to lineage switch.
In four out of six patients (66.7%), several or all clonal markers were stable during blinatumomab treatment and lineage switch. This finding indicates the high probability that these markers are specific for all leukemic cells (or even for leukemic precursors) of a particular patient. They thus can be used for minimal residual disease monitoring even after lineage switch.

3. Discussion

While solving important clinical problems, targeted immunotherapy sets new challenges in disease monitoring and choosing consequent treatment strategies. The usage of CD19-directed therapies was shown to induce fluctuations in the expression of CD19 and other antigens on leukemic cells [8,9]. Moreover, leukemic cells can completely lose B-lineage antigens and acquire markers of other hematopoietic lineages. These two main mechanisms of tumor escape from the pressure of immunotherapy both limit possible salvage options [22] and hamper the well-established methodology of flow cytometric MRD detection [9,23,24]. Such cases were reported either after blinatumomab [25] or after CAR-T cell therapy [13,17,18,26]. In this work, we report the incidence of lineage switch in a significant cohort of children with R/R BCP-ALL after treatment with blinatumomab. Moreover, various patterns of immunophenotypic changes and molecular behavior are described. Although the study group was rather heterogeneous (by age, disease status, number of blinatumomab cycles), we consider these data representative, as lineage conversion could be the mechanism of tumor escape in any group of patients with BCP-ALL after immunotherapy.
Regardless of the applied therapeutic agent, the majority of lineage conversions are characterized by the presence of KMT2A gene rearrangements [27]. Among the patients presented in this study, only one patient did not carry a KMT2A rearrangement but was found to have t(12;19)(p13;p13)/TCF3::ZNF384. This genetic aberration has been frequently observed in acute leukemia with a mixed B/myeloid immunophenotype [18]. Also in described patient, the additional very small myeloid subpopulation was visible during the whole course of relapse treatment prior to lineage switch. Cases of lineage conversion in patients harboring TCF3::ZNF384 translocation were recently reported [18]. Our findings as well as published data [18,28,29] indicate that lineage switch is not restricted to KMT2A-rearranged cases and can be anticipated in ALL with ZNF384 rearrangement.
The immunophenotypic presentation of the described cases was different. Along with the generally typical substitution of BCP-ALL by myeloid leukemia (n = 3), in two cases, pre-existing myeloid cells benefited from the selective pressure targeting the lymphoid population. The remaining case demonstrated the appearance of unclassifiable leukemic cells with a completely unspecific immunophenotype but retained genetic characteristics. This case included the most complicated confirmation of lineage switch because of the coexistence of BCP-ALL cells and cells of an unexpected and completely unclassifiable immunophenotype. In contrast, two cases with a pre-existing myeloid subpopulation included easier recognition of lineage switch, as the presence of such a population prior to CD19 targeting was an obvious sign of a possible lineage switch. Cases of complete BCP-ALL substitution by AML are also foreseeable, as they have occurred in patients with KMT2A rearrangements, but their timely identification required careful investigation of all main BM compartments during MFC-MRD analysis, as recommended previously [9]. Half of the described cases included recognition of the lineage switch before completion of the blinatumomab course; hence, it was impossible to predict the lineage switch by MRD studies. Regardless, the detection of myeloid cells at the MRD level would likely be very difficult even if the B-lineage MRD antibody set is expanded with additional markers.
The leukemic clone behavior assessed by investigation of IG/TR gene rearrangements was also different in the studied cases, representing three different patterns, which were sometimes found in the same cases. Only in two of six patients was the clonal architecture stable, while in others, loss of clones or gain of new clones was noted. In terms of overall clonal fluctuations, four out of six analyzed samples had at least two stable IG/TR targets for MRD monitoring. Furthermore, two samples completely lacked appropriate IG/TR targets for MRD monitoring. Thus, the initial presence of markers specific for dominant leukemic clones in each particular case does not guarantee the reliability of MRD monitoring due to the rather high probability of IG/TR marker disappearance at lineage switch. The mutational profile of the described cases was also different. As expected [30], KMT2A-r patients demonstrated very few additional mutations, with only one out of five patients acquiring pathogenic events in AML relapse. In contrast, in children with t(12;19)(p13;p13)/TCF3::ZNF384, a change in leukemic subpopulation distribution was accompanied by a large set of additional mutations. Our findings on additional mutations are in line with KRAS being frequently mutated in primary BCP-ALL as well as in relapse and TP53 being enriched in relapse [31,32]. Among molecular markers, only gene fusions and their transcripts displayed absolute stability during lineage conversion. This stability enabled us to confirm that all the “new” leukemic subpopulations were indeed new incarnations of the same tumor with changed immunophenotype and several changed molecular characteristics. Moreover, these fusions could serve as stable targets for MRD monitoring [33].
Indeed, the two-thirds of lineage switches appeared in the form of tumor refractoriness to CD19 targeting. Only two of the six cases included relapse after achievement of complete remission. Both cases with pre-existing myeloid tumor populations were resistant to blinatumomab. Thus, in patients with an existing myeloid leukemia population, regardless of the presence of KMT2A-r, the use of blinatumomab can lead to growth of this myeloid subpopulation. Indeed, one can classify such cases as MPAL due to presence of cells with immunophenotypic features of both lymphoid and myeloid lineages. Nevertheless, small visible (on the MRD level) myeloid tumor population on the background of huge BM infiltration by B-lineage blasts is never considered as the obstacle for the blinatumomab application [34,35,36]. Such selection of pre-existing myeloid tumor population is also considered as the lineage switch [37]. Moreover, even for B/Myeloid MPAL, targeting of CD19 does not always lead to the selection of myeloid population [34,35,36], especially if myeloid-type therapy is used [34].
Finally, two main recommendations for MRD monitoring after CD19-directed treatment could be stated. First, careful investigation of all BM compartments prior to and after course of blinatumomab, especially in patients with KMT2A rearrangements and ZNF384 fusions, can result in timely diagnosis of lineage switch. Suspicious myeloid cells could be found according to expression of CD45, which is always the part of MRD-oriented panels in BCP-ALL and light-scatter properties. In a part of the samples, evaluation of unusual myeloid cells could be performed using CD24, antigen, which is recommended for use in MFC-MRD monitoring after CD19-directed therapy as the possible substitution for CD19 [38]. Thereafter, such cells should be investigated with more detailed immunophenotyping or other ways of confirmation of their tumor origin [39]. On the other hand, one of the main results of the current work is demonstration of stability of fusion genes and their transcripts as the possible MRD targets, in contrast to IG/TR rearrangements and mutation patterns. Therefore, high levels of MRD assessed by detection of fusions with the absence of the huge amount of B-lineage blasts by MFC have to be considered as the possible indication of probable lineage conversion.
Despite detailed description of immunophenotypic and molecular changes, it is still difficult to make a definitive conclusion of the prognostic value of lineage conversion. Of course, cases of resistance to blinatumomab via lineage switch have grim prognosis, although for patients for whom completion of CD19-targeting did not result in immediate switch, subsequent myeloid-style treatment could be the way for relapse prevention even for children with pre-existing myeloid tumor subpopulation [34].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients

Between January 2016 and September 2021, a total of 182 children (0–18 years old) with BCP-ALL were treated with blinatumomab in four medical institutions. Twenty-three patients were resistant to immunotherapy, while 67 experienced relapse following achievement of complete remission. All patients or their legal guardians signed informed consent forms.

4.2. Blinatumomab Schedule

A blinatumomab course of continuous intravenous infusion at doses of 5 µg/m2/day (Days 1–7) and 15 µg/m2/day (Days 8–28) was administered for four weeks. The doses were escalated to fixed values of 9 µg/day (Days 1–7) and 28 µg/day (Days 8–28) for elderly patients whose weight was greater than or equal to 45 kg.

4.3. Immunophenotyping

Bone marrow (BM) samples were studied using flow cytometry at the time of diagnosis and relapse and were assessed for MRD presence at follow-up time points with respect to the treatment protocols. The diagnostic panels of fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies were based on Moscow–Berlin-group diagnostic standards [40]. The antibody panels for MRD monitoring were reported previously [41]. The flow cytometry data were collected on FACSCanto II (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA), Navios (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and CytoFLEX (Beckman Coulter) flow cytometers and then analyzed using Kaluza 2.1 software (Beckman Coulter). EuroFlow guidelines for machine performance monitoring were used [42]. Cytometer Setup and Tracking Beads (BD), Flow-Check Pro Fluorospheres (Beckman Coulter) and CytoFLEX Daily QC Fluorospheres (Beckman Coulter) were used for daily cytometer optimization.

4.4. Evaluation of Breakpoint Junctions in Fusion Genes and Fusion Transcripts

BM aspirates obtained at diagnosis and relapse were cultured overnight without mitogenic stimulation and processed as previously described [43]. GTG-stained karyotypes were recorded as per the International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature 2020 [44]. FISH analysis with corresponding probes was performed at diagnosis and relapse according to the manufacturer’s instructions; at least 200 interphase nuclei were analyzed in each case. The probes used were as follows: XL KMT2A Plus break-apart (MetaSystems GMBH, Altlussheim, Germany), Kreatech ON KMT2A/AFF1 t(4;11) fusion or Kreatech ON KMT2A/MLLT1 t(11;19) fusion (Leica Microsystems B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) for KMT2A-rearranged samples, and CytoTest E2A break-apart (CytoTest, Rockville, MD, USA) and Cytocell ZNF384 break-apart (Cytocell, Milton, Cambridge, UK) for samples without KMT2A rearrangement. Percentage of rearranged cells is summarized in Table S5.
Total DNA and RNA were simultaneously extracted from BM aspirates using the InnuPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). DNA breakpoint junctions were defined for KMT2A-rearranged samples with a targeted enrichment panel for the whole KMT2A gene [45], followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and validated by Sanger sequencing for all diagnosis and relapse samples. The expression of the corresponding fusion transcripts was demonstrated by RT–PCR on total RNA for all diagnosis and relapse samples. Samples lacking KMT2A gene rearrangement were subjected to transcriptome analysis. RNA for the transcriptome analysis was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
The RNA-seq library was prepared using the NEBNext Ultra II Directional kit (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA); sequencing was performed on the Illumina NextSeq platform (Illumina). NGS data were aligned to the reference genome using the STAR algorithm [46]. Fusion transcripts were found using the Arriba algorithm [47] and validated by Sanger sequencing. The direct genomic DNA PCR and RT–PCR primers are listed in Table S3.

4.5. Exome Sequencing

NGS libraries were prepared from 300 to 600 ng of genomic DNA using the MGIEasy Universal DNA Library Prep Set (MGI Tech, Shenzhen Shi, China), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA was fragmented to an average fragment length of 250 bp on a Covaris S-220 device (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). DNA enrichment was carried out on preliminary pooled libraries [48] using SureSelect Human All Exon v7 probes, recognizing the complete human genome (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The libraries were circularized and sequenced in paired-end mode on the MGISEQ-2000 platform using the DNBSEQ-G400RS High-throughput Sequencing Set PE100 according to the manufacturer’s protocol (MGI Tech), with an average coverage of 100x. The FastQ files were generated using the manufacturer’s zebracallV2 software (MGI Tech, Shenzhen Shi, China).
Raw data quality control was conducted with FastQC (v0.11.9) [49]. Raw reads were filtered, and adapters were trimmed using fastp (v0.19.4) [50]. After quality control, the reads were mapped to the hg38 reference primary assembly genome (Release 38) from GENCODE [51] by BWA (v0.7.17) [52]. SAM files were converted to BAM files and sorted by coordinates with SAMtools (v1.13) [53]. Duplicated reads were marked with Picard (v2.26.1) (Picard Tools, Broad Institute; available from http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard, accessed on 10 February 2022). Variant calling was performed with the Genome Analysis Tool Kit Mutect2 in tumor-only mode (v4.2.2.0) following GATK’s best practice [54]. The resulting mutations were annotated with Annovar (v2019Oct24) [55] and VEP (v104.3) (EMBL’s European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK) [56].

4.6. Detection of Clonal Rearrangements by Next-Generation Sequencing

Clonality assessment was performed using high-throughput sequencing of TCR/BCR genes with rearrangements. Sequencing libraries were constructed as previously described [57] using two-step PCR and genomic DNA as input material. Target enrichment was performed in the first PCR step with a multiplex primer set for the V, D, and J segments of all rearranged TCR and BCR genes rearrangements: TRA, TRB, TRG, TRD, IGH, IGK, and IGL (MiLaboratory LLC., Sunnyvale, CA, USA-, https://milaboratories.com/kits accessed on 10 February 2022). Each PCR (25 μL) contained primer mix (MiLaboratory), 100 ng of genomic DNA, six units of HS Taq polymerase in 1X Turbo buffer, and dNTPs (0.125 μmol/L each) (all Evrogen, Russia). The amplification profile was as follows: 94 °C for 3 min (initial denaturation), 94 °C for 20 s, 56 °C for 90 s, and 72 °C for 40 s for ten cycles, followed by 94 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 90 s for 15 cycles with a ramp rate of 0.5 °C/s for all stages. The obtained amplicons were cleaned up using one volume of magnetic AmPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Second, PCR with UDI primers (Illumina) was used to attach sample indices and adapters to the libraries. The final libraries were cleaned up as described above, pooled together, and sequenced on a MiSeq instrument (paired-end 150 nt reads). TCR and BCR rearrangement repertoires were extracted from sequencing data using modified MiXCR software [58] and converted into VDJtools software format [59]. Amplification errors were corrected using the Correct function from the VDJtools package. Multiplex-specific quantitative biases were corrected using iROAR software [60]. A frequency of 5% was used as a cutoff to identify rearrangements specific for leukemic clones.

5. Conclusions

Understanding the potential risk factors for lineage switch and developing a strategy for monitoring patients at risk are of high importance. In the presented cases, the immunophenotype of an existing leukemia sometimes changed via different mechanisms and with different additional molecular changes. In addition, different patients, not only those carrying KMT2A rearrangements, can undergo such lineage conversion under the selective pressure of blinatumomab. We can conclude that careful investigation of all BM compartments (at least according to CD45 expression and light-scatter properties) in addition to conventional B-lineage MRD investigation with precise inspection of all suspicious cell populations can lead to reliable, timely identification of lineage switch. Moreover, the results of all types of molecular MRD studies, especially the detection of gene fusions, can be valuable for flow cytometry identification of patients who are highly likely to undergo lineage conversion.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23074019/s1.

Author Contributions

A.S. (Alexandra Semchenkova)—concept and design of the study, data analysis and interpretation, writing the paper; E.M. (Ekaterina Mikhailova)—MFC data, data analysis and interpretation, writing the paper; A.K.—clonality assessment data, writing the paper; M.G.—mutational profile analysis; R.A.—bioinformatics; E.M. (Evgenii Matveev)—transcriptome data, bioinformatics; M.K.—bioinformatics; I.M.—clonality assessment data; A.S. (Anna Shmitko)—transcriptome data; V.B.—transcriptome data; A.M. (Anna Miroshnichenkova)—database handling, data analysis; O.I.—flow cytometric data; Y.O.—cytogenetics data; G.T.—patients data; T.V.—patients data; N.P.—patients data; G.B.—patients data; K.K.—patients data; L.F.—patients data; Y.D.—patients data; L.V.—patients data; N.M.—concept and design of the study, patients data; G.N.—concept and design of the study, general supervising, writing the paper; A.M. (Alexey Maschan)—concept and design of the study, general supervising, writing the paper; M.M.—concept and design of the study, general supervising, writing the paper; E.Z.—concept and design of the study, cytogenetics and molecular genetics data, data analysis and interpretation, writing the paper; A.P.—concept and design of the study, MFC-MRD data, data analysis and interpretation, writing the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The KMT2A rearrangement assessment study was supported by RFBR grant No. 17-29-06052 and Presidential grant No. MK-1645.2020.7 (No. 075-15-2020-338). Flow cytometric minimal residual disease evaluation and assessment of clonal rearrangements of IG/TR genes were supported by RFBR grant No. 18-29-09132. Clonality assessment was performed with support of Russian Science Foundation grant 20-75-10091. The study was supported by the Foundation for support and development in the field of pediatric hematology, oncology and immunology “Science for Children”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional scientific board and Ethics Committee of the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent for the collection and investigation of samples and for participation in the current study was obtained from patients’ parents or legal guardians.

Data Availability Statement

All the data and material are available upon reasonable request to [email protected].

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all doctors, nurses and laboratory personnel in participating institutions who were involved in patients’ diagnostics, management and monitoring.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no relevant conflict of interest.

References

  1. Topp, M.S.; Gökbuget, N.; Zugmaier, G.; Klappers, P.; Stelljes, M.; Neumann, S.; Viardot, A.; Marks, R.; Diedrich, H.; Faul, C.; et al. Phase II Trial of the Anti-CD19 Bispecific T Cell–Engager Blinatumomab Shows Hematologic and Molecular Remissions in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 4134–4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Von Stackelberg, A.; Locatelli, F.; Zugmaier, G.; Handgretinger, R.; Trippett, T.M.; Rizzari, C.; Bader, P.; O’Brien, M.M.; Brethon, B.; Bhojwani, D.; et al. Phase I/Phase II Study of Blinatumomab in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 4381–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kantarjian, H.; Stein, A.; Gökbuget, N.; Fielding, A.K.; Schuh, A.C.; Ribera, J.-M.; Wei, A.; Dombret, H.; Foà, R.; Bassan, R.; et al. Blinatumomab versus Chemotherapy for Advanced Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 836–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Locatelli, F.; Zugmaier, G.; Rizzari, C.; Morris, J.D.; Gruhn, B.; Klingebiel, T.; Parasole, R.; Linderkamp, C.; Flotho, C.; Petit, A.; et al. Effect of blinatumomab vs chemotherapy on event-free survival among children with high-risk first-relapse B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021, 325, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Klinger, M.; Brandl, C.; Zugmaier, G.; Hijazi, Y.; Bargou, R.C.; Topp, M.S.; Gökbuget, N.; Neumann, S.; Goebeler, M.; Viardot, A.; et al. Immunopharmacologic response of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to continuous infusion of T cell–engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody blinatumomab. Blood 2012, 119, 6226–6233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Queudeville, M.; Schlegel, P.; Heinz, A.T.; Lenz, T.; Döring, M.; Holzer, U.; Hartmann, U.; Kreyenberg, H.; von Stackelberg, A.; Schrappe, M.; et al. Blinatumomab in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Eur. J. Haematol. 2021, 106, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Topp, M.S.; Kufer, P.; Gökbuget, N.; Goebeler, M.; Klinger, M.; Neumann, S.; Horst, H.-A.; Raff, T.; Viardot, A.; Schmid, M.; et al. Targeted Therapy With the T-Cell–Engaging Antibody Blinatumomab of Chemotherapy-Refractory Minimal Residual Disease in B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Results in High Response Rate and Prolonged Leukemia-Free Survival. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 2493–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Libert, D.; Yuan, C.M.; Masih, K.; Galera, P.; Salem, D.; Shalabi, H.; Yates, B.; Delbrook, C.; Shern, J.F.; Fry, T.J.; et al. Serial evaluation of CD19 surface expression in pediatric B-cell malignancies following CD19-targeted therapy. Leukemia 2020, 34, 3064–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mikhailova, E.; Gluhanyuk, E.; Illarionova, O.; Zerkalenkova, E.; Kashpor, S.; Miakova, N.; Diakonova, Y.; Olshanskaya, Y.; Shelikhova, L.; Novichkova, G.; et al. Immunophenotypic changes of leukemic blasts in children with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia who have been treated with blinatumomab. Haematologica 2021, 106, 2009–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dorantes, E.; Pelayo, R. Lineage Switching in Acute Leukemias: A Consequence of Stem Cell Plasticity? Bone Marrow Res. 2012, 2012, 406796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Perna, F.; Sadelain, M. Myeloid leukemia switch as immune escape from CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy. Transl. Cancer Res. 2016, 5, S221–S225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Stass, S.; Mirro, J.; Melvin, S.; Pui, C.H.; Murphy, S.B.; Williams, D. Lineage switch in acute leukemia. Blood 1984, 64, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gardner, R.; Wu, D.; Cherian, S.; Fang, M.; Hanafi, L.-A.; Finney, O.; Smithers, H.; Jensen, M.C.; Riddell, S.R.; Maloney, D.G.; et al. Acquisition of a CD19-negative myeloid phenotype allows immune escape of MLL-rearranged B-ALL from CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy. Blood 2016, 127, 2406–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Jacoby, E.; Nguyen, S.M.; Fountaine, T.J.; Welp, K.; Gryder, B.; Qin, H.; Yang, Y.; Chien, C.D.; Seif, A.; Lei, H.; et al. CD19 CAR immune pressure induces B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia lineage switch exposing inherent leukaemic plasticity. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zoghbi, A.; Stadt, U.Z.; Winkler, B.; Müller, I.; Escherich, G. Lineage switch under blinatumomab treatment of relapsed common acute lymphoblastic leukemia without MLL rearrangement. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2017, 64, e26594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Balducci, E.; Nivaggioni, V.; Boudjarane, J.; Bouriche, L.; Rahal, I.; Bernot, D.; Alazard, E.; Duployez, N.; Grardel, N.; Arnoux, I.; et al. Lineage switch from B acute lymphoblastic leukemia to acute monocytic leukemia with persistent t(4;11)(q21;q23) and cytogenetic evolution under CD19-targeted therapy. Ann. Hematol. 2017, 96, 1579–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mo, G.; Wang, H.-W.; Talleur, A.C.; Shahani, S.A.; Yates, B.; Shalabi, H.; Douvas, M.G.; Calvo, K.R.; Shern, J.F.; Chaganti, S.; et al. Diagnostic approach to the evaluation of myeloid malignancies following CAR T-cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Immunother. Cancer 2020, 8, e001563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oberley, M.J.; Gaynon, P.S.; Bhojwani, D.; Pulsipher, M.A.; Gardner, R.A.; Hiemenz, M.C.; Ji, J.; Han, J.; O’Gorman, M.R.G.; Wayne, A.S.; et al. Myeloid lineage switch following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in a patient with TCF3-ZNF384 fusion-positive B-lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2018, 65, e27265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hunger, S.P.; Mullighan, C.G. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1541–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bene, M.C.; Castoldi, G.; Knapp, W.; Ludwig, W.D.; Matutes, E.; Orfao, A.; van’t Veer, M.B. Proposals for the immunological classification of acute leukemias. European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL). Leukemia 1995, 9, 1783–1786. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mühleck, R.; Scholl, S.; Hilgendorf, I.; Schrenk, K.; Hammersen, J.; Frietsch, J.J.; Fleischmann, M.; Sayer, H.G.; Glaser, A.; Hochhaus, A.; et al. Outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia treated with Mito-FLAG salvage chemotherapy. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2021. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ruella, M.; Maus, M.V. Catch me if you can: Leukemia Escape after CD19-Directed T Cell Immunotherapies. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Cherian, S.; Stetler-Stevenson, M. Flow Cytometric Monitoring for Residual Disease in B Lymphoblastic Leukemia Post T Cell Engaging Targeted Therapies. Curr. Protoc. Cytom. 2018, 86, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mejstríková, E.; Hrusak, O.; Borowitz, M.J.; Whitlock, J.A.; Brethon, B.; Trippett, T.M.; Zugmaier, G.; Gore, L.; Von Stackelberg, A.; Locatelli, F. CD19-negative relapse of pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia following blinatumomab treatment. Blood Cancer J. 2017, 7, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Clesham, K.; Rao, V.N.; Bartram, J.; Ancliff, P.; Ghorashian, S.; O’Connor, D.; Pavasovic, V.; Rao, A.; Samarasinghe, S.; E Cummins, M.; et al. Blinatumomab for infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2020, 135, 1501–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lucero, O.M.; Parker, K.; Funk, T.; Dunlap, J.; Press, R.; Gardner, R.A.; Chang, B.H. Phenotype switch in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia associated with 3 years of persistent CAR T cell directed-CD19 selective pressure. Br. J. Haematol. 2019, 186, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liao, W.; Kohler, M.E.; Fry, T.; Ernst, P. Does lineage plasticity enable escape from CAR-T cell therapy? Lessons from MLL-r leukemia. Exp. Hematol. 2021, 100, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hirabayashi, S.; Butler, E.R.; Ohki, K.; Kiyokawa, N.; Bergmann, A.K.; Möricke, A.; Boer, J.M.; Cavé, H.; Cazzaniga, G.; Yeoh, A.E.J.; et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of B-ALL with ZNF384 rearrangements: A retrospective analysis by the Ponte di Legno Childhood ALL Working Group. Leukemia 2021, 35, 3272–3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grammatico, S.; Vitale, A.; La Starza, R.; Gorello, P.; Angelosanto, N.; Negulici, A.D.; De Propris, M.S.; Nanni, M.; Meloni, G.; Mecucci, C.; et al. Lineage switch from pro-B acute lymphoid leukemia to acute myeloid leukemia in a case with t(12;17)(p13;q11)/TAF15–ZNF384rearrangement. Leuk. Lymphoma 2013, 54, 1802–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Andersson, A.K.; Ma, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Gedman, A.L.; Dang, J.; Nakitandwe, J.; Holmfeldt, L.; Parker, M.; Easton, J.; et al. The landscape of somatic mutations in infant MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemias. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qian, J.; Li, Z.; Pei, K.; Li, Z.; Li, C.; Yan, M.; Qian, M.; Song, Y.; Zhang, H.; He, Y. Effects of NRAS Mutations on Leukemogenesis and Targeting of Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 712484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, X.; Edmonson, M.; Yergeau, D.; Muzny, D.M.; Hampton, O.A.; Rusch, M.; Song, G.; Easton, J.; Harvey, R.; Wheeler, D.A.; et al. Rise and fall of subclones from diagnosis to relapse in pediatric B-acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kuiper, R.P.; Hoogeveen, P.G.; Bladergroen, R.; van Dijk, F.; Sonneveld, E.; van Leeuwen, F.N.; Boer, J.; Sergeeva, I.; Feitsma, H.; Boer, M.L.D.; et al. Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia based on fusion genes and genomic deletions: Towards MRD for all. Br. J. Haematol. 2021, 194, 888–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bartram, J.; Balasch-Carulla, M.; Bhojaraja, S.; Adams, S.; Cheng, D.; Inglott, S.; Kulkarni, N.; Mahendrayogam, A.; O’Connor, O.; Pavasovic, V.; et al. Blinatumomab for paediatric mixed phenotype acute leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2021, 195, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Durer, S.; Shafqat, M.; Comba, I.Y.; Malik, S.; Faridi, W.; Aslam, S.; Ijaz, A.; Tariq, M.J.; Fraz, M.A.; Usman, M.; et al. Concomitant use of blinatumomab and donor lymphocyte infusion for mixed-phenotype acute leukemia: A case report with literature review. Immunotherapy 2019, 11, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. El Chaer, F.; Ali, O.M.; Sausville, E.A.; Law, J.Y.; Lee, S.T.; Duong, V.H.; Baer, M.R.; Koka, R.; Singh, Z.N.; Wong, J.; et al. Treatment of CD19-positive mixed phenotype acute leukemia with blinatumomab. Am. J. Hematol. 2018, 94, E7–E8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Batra, S.; Ross, A.J. Pediatric Mixed-Phenotype Acute Leukemia: What’s New? Cancers 2021, 13, 4658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cherian, S.; Miller, V.; McCullouch, V.; Dougherty, K.; Fromm, J.R.; Wood, B.L. A novel flow cytometric assay for detection of residual disease in patients with B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma post anti-CD19 therapy. Cytom. Part B: Clin. Cytom. 2016, 94, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Semchenkova, A.; Brilliantova, V.; Shelikhova, L.; Zhogov, V.; Illarionova, O.; Mikhailova, E.; Raykina, E.; Skorobogatova, E.; Novichkova, G.; Maschan, A.; et al. Chimerism evaluation in measurable residual disease-suspected cells isolated by flow cell sorting as a reliable tool for measurable residual disease verification in acute leukemia patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cytom. Part B: Clin. Cytom. 2020, 100, 568–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Novikova, I.A.; Verzhbitskaya, T.Y.; Movchan, L.V.; Tsaur, G.A.; Belevtsev, M.; Popov, A.M. Russian-belarusian multicenter group standard guidelines for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia flow cytometric diagnostics. Oncohematology 2018, 13, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mikhailova, E.; Semchenkova, A.; Illarionova, O.; Kashpor, S.; Brilliantova, V.; Zakharova, E.; Zerkalenkova, E.; Zangrando, A.; Bocharova, N.; Shelikhova, L.; et al. Relative expansion of CD19-negative very-early normal B-cell precursors in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia after CD19 targeting by blinatumomab and CAR-T cell therapy: Implications for flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease. Br. J. Haematol. 2021, 193, 602–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kalina, T.; Flores-Montero, J.; Lecrevisse, Q.; Pedreira, C.E.; Van Der Velden, V.H.J.; Novakova, M.; Mejstrikova, E.; Hrusak, O.; Böttcher, S.; Karsch, D.; et al. Quality assessment program for EuroFlow protocols: Summary results of four-year (2010–2013) quality assurance rounds. Cytom. Part A 2014, 87, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Den Nijs, J.I.; Gonggrijp, H.S.; Augustinus, E.; Leeksma, C.H.W. Hot bands: A simple G-banding method for leukemic metaphases. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1985, 15, 373–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. McGowan-Jordan, J.A.; Hastings, R.J.; Moore, S. ISCN, An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature; Karger Publishers: Basel, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  45. Meyer, C.; Lopes, B.A.; Caye-Eude, A.; Cavé, H.; Arfeuille, C.; Cuccuini, W.; Sutton, R.; Venn, N.C.; Oh, S.H.; Tsaur, G.; et al. Human MLL/KMT2A gene exhibits a second breakpoint cluster region for recurrent MLL–USP2 fusions. Leukemia 2019, 33, 2306–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dobin, A.; Davis, C.A.; Schlesinger, F.; Drenkow, J.; Zaleski, C.; Jha, S.; Batut, P.; Chaisson, M.; Gingeras, T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Uhrig, S.; Ellermann, J.; Walther, T.; Burkhardt, P.; Fröhlich, M.; Hutter, B.; Toprak, U.H.; Neumann, O.; Stenzinger, A.; Scholl, C.; et al. Accurate and efficient detection of gene fusions from RNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2021, 31, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Belova, V.; Pavlova, A.; Afasizhev, R.; Moskalenko, V.; Korzhanova, M.; Krivoy, A.; Cheranev, V.; Nikashin, B.; Bulusheva, I.; Rebrikov, D.; et al. System analysis of the sequencing quality of human whole exome samples on BGI NGS platform. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. 2010; eCollection 2019. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33552473/ (accessed on 10 February 2022). [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Frankish, A.; Diekhans, M.; Ferreira, A.-M.; Johnson, R.; Jungreis, I.; Loveland, J.; Mudge, J.M.; Sisu, C.; Wright, J.; Armstrong, J.; et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D766–D773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Van Der Auwera, G.A.; Carneiro, M.O.; Hartl, C.; Poplin, R.; Del Angel, G.; Levy-Moonshine, A.; Jordan, T.; Shakir, K.; Roazen, D.; Thibault, J.; et al. From FastQ Data to High-Confidence Variant Calls: The Genome Analysis Toolkit Best Practices Pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2013, 43, 11.10.1–111033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, K.; Li, M.; Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, e164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. McLaren, W.; Gil, L.; Hunt, S.E.; Riat, H.S.; Ritchie, G.R.S.; Thormann, A.; Flicek, P.; Cunningham, F. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Komkov, A.; Miroshnichenkova, A.; Nugmanov, G.; Popov, A.; Pogorelyy, M.; Zapletalova, E.; Jelinkova, H.; Pospisilova, S.; Lebedev, Y.; Chudakov, D.; et al. High-throughput sequencing of T-cell receptor alpha chain clonal rearrangements at the DNA level in lymphoid malignancies. Br. J. Haematol. 2019, 188, 723–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bolotin, D.; Poslavsky, S.; Mitrophanov, I.; Shugay, M.; Mamedov, I.Z.; Putintseva, E.; Chudakov, D.M. MiXCR: Software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 380–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Shugay, M.; Bagaev, D.V.; Turchaninova, M.; Bolotin, D.; Britanova, O.V.; Putintseva, E.; Pogorelyy, M.; Nazarov, V.I.; Zvyagin, I.V.; Kirgizova, V.I.; et al. VDJtools: Unifying Post-analysis of T Cell Receptor Repertoires. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2015, 11, e1004503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Komkov, A.; Smirnova, A.; Miroshnichenkova, A.; Volchkov, E.; Olshanskaya, Y.; Maschan, M.; Lebedev, Y.; Chudakov, D.; Mamedov, I. The use of non-functional clonotypes as a natural spike-in for multiplex PCR bias correction in immune receptor repertoire profiling. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 04019 g001 550
Figure 1. Example case of complete substitution of BCP-ALL by AML (pt #1). Tumor cells are shown in red; other bone marrow cells are gray. SSC—side-scatter, i—intracellular expression.
Figure 1. Example case of complete substitution of BCP-ALL by AML (pt #1). Tumor cells are shown in red; other bone marrow cells are gray. SSC—side-scatter, i—intracellular expression.
Ijms 23 04019 g001
Ijms 23 04019 g002 550
Figure 2. Example case of selection of a pre-existing myeloid population (pt #2). BCP-ALL cells are shown in red; myeloid cells are painted black; other bone marrow cells are gray. SSC—side-scatter.
Figure 2. Example case of selection of a pre-existing myeloid population (pt #2). BCP-ALL cells are shown in red; myeloid cells are painted black; other bone marrow cells are gray. SSC—side-scatter.
Ijms 23 04019 g002
Ijms 23 04019 g003 550
Figure 3. Case of acquisition of an additional unclassifiable leukemic population (black) on the background of still-existing BCP-ALL cells (red) (pt #3). Other bone marrow cells are gray. SSC—side-scatter.
Figure 3. Case of acquisition of an additional unclassifiable leukemic population (black) on the background of still-existing BCP-ALL cells (red) (pt #3). Other bone marrow cells are gray. SSC—side-scatter.
Ijms 23 04019 g003
Ijms 23 04019 g004 550
Figure 4. Molecular studies in lineage-switched patients demonstrating consistency of the main chromosomal translocations. (A)—KMT2A::AFF1 fusion gene in pt #1; (B)—TCF3::ZNF384 fusion gene in pt #2; (C)—KMT2A::MLLT1 fusion gene in pt #3; (D)—KMT2A::AFF1 fusion gene in pt #4; (E)—KMT2A-7q22.1 part of a fusion gene in #5 (complex KMT2A-7q22.1-MLLT1 upstream DNA fusion gene is depicted in Figure S4); (F)—KMT2A::AFF1 fusion gene in pt #6.
Figure 4. Molecular studies in lineage-switched patients demonstrating consistency of the main chromosomal translocations. (A)—KMT2A::AFF1 fusion gene in pt #1; (B)—TCF3::ZNF384 fusion gene in pt #2; (C)—KMT2A::MLLT1 fusion gene in pt #3; (D)—KMT2A::AFF1 fusion gene in pt #4; (E)—KMT2A-7q22.1 part of a fusion gene in #5 (complex KMT2A-7q22.1-MLLT1 upstream DNA fusion gene is depicted in Figure S4); (F)—KMT2A::AFF1 fusion gene in pt #6.
Ijms 23 04019 g004
Table
Table 1. Treatment and response history.
Table 1. Treatment and response history.
Patient #Initial Diagnosis [Age] → Diagnosis at Lineage Switch [Age]Treatment before Blinatumomab [Result]Blinatumomab Course [Result]Post-Switch Treatment [Result]Time from Lineage Switch to Death
#1BCP-ALL [12 years] → AML [13 years]
  • ALL-MB 2015 [MRD(+) CR]
  • Allo-HSCT [1st relapse at 3 months]
Blinatumomab x2 [MRD(-) CR, then 2nd relapse and lineage switch at 4 months]FLAM block → allo-HSCT [MRD(-) CR]Alive in CR
#2BCP-ALL [3 years] → ALAL (B + myeloid) [10 years]
  • ALL-BFM 90 [CR, then 1st relapse at 5 years]
  • ALL-REZ-MB 2014 [CR, then 2nd relapse at 1 year]
  • HR3 block [ALL-REZ-MB 2014]
Blinatumomab [lineage switch at 35 days]Cytarabine + clofarabine [no response] → palliative care39 days
#3BCP-ALL [10 years] → ALAL (B + unclassifiable) [11 years]ALL-MB 2015 [MRD(-) CR, then 1st relapse at 9 months]Blinatumomab → allo-HSCT [MRD(-) CR, then 2nd relapse and lineage switch at 3.8 months]Dexamethasone + cyclophosphamide → hAM24 → allo-HSCT + CAR-T cells [MRD(-) CR, then 3rd relapse at 2 months] → palliative care8 months
#4BCP-ALL [14 days] → ALAL (B + myeloid) [6 months]MLL Baby [no response]Blinatumomab [no response, lineage switch at 22 days]Palliative care9 days
#5BCP-ALL [11 months] → AML [2 years]
  • MLL Baby [MRD(-) CR, then 1st relapse at 9 months]
  • ALL-REZ-MB 2014 [MRD(+) CR]
Blinatumomab [lineage switch at 27 days]Dexamethasone + etoposide + daunorubicin [no response] → palliative care42 days
#6BCP-ALL [6 months] → AML [6 years]
  • MLL Baby induction + Interfant 2006 [MRD(-) CR, then 1st relapse at 5 years]
  • ALL-MB 2015 → allo-HSCT [CR, then MRD-reappearance]
Blinatumomab [lineage switch at 20 days]Daratumumab [unknown]LFU
BCP-ALL, B-cell precursor acute leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ALAL, acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage; MRD, minimal residual disease; CR, complete remission; allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T; LFU, lost to follow-up; y, years; mo, months; d, days; N/A, not applicable.
Table
Table 2. Key laboratory findings.
Table 2. Key laboratory findings.
Patient #DiagnosisImmunophenotypic MarkersKaryotypeCytogenetic AberrationFusion Gene Breakpoint JunctionFusion Transcript Breakpoint JunctionAdditional Pathogenic MutationsFeature of Clonal Evolution
1BCP-ALLCD19+iCD79a+CD10-CD45+CD34+/-No metaphasest(4;11)(q21;q23)/KMT2A::AFF1IdenticalIdentical-Clone loss + new clones
AMLCD19- iCD79a-CD33+CD117+CD56+CD11c-/+47,XX,t(4;11)(q21.3-q22.1;q23.3),+6,der(15)add(p13) [10]-
2BCP-ALLCD19+iCD79a+CD10-CD45+46,XX [8]t(12;19)(p13;p13)/TCF3::ZNF384IdenticalIdentical-Leukemic clone persistence
ALAL (B + myeloid)
(1)
CD19+iCD79a+CD10-CD34+CD33+CD45-
(2)
CD19-CD10-CD34+CD33+CD45+
No metaphasesTP53 p.R89Q
TP53 p.R16H
3BCP-ALLCD19+ iCD79a+iCD22+CD10-CD34-CD33+CD45+47,XX,+6,t(11;19)(q23.3;p13.3) [17]/46,XX [3]t(11;19)(q23;p13)/KMT2A::MLLT1IdenticalIdentical-Leukemic clone persistence + new subclone
ALAL (B + unclassifiable)
(1)
CD19+CD33-CD34-CD45+
(2)
CD19-CD33-CD34-CD117+/-CD45+CD123+
No metaphases-
4BCP-ALLCD19+iCD79a+CD22+CD10-CD45+46,XX,t(4;11)(q21.3-q22.1;q23.3),der(13)c [11]t(4;11)(q21;q23)/KMT2A::AFF1IdenticalIdenticalKRAS p.G12DClone loss + new clones
ALAL (B + myeloid)
(1)
CD19+CD10-CD45+
(2)
CD19-CD14+CD64+CD33+
47,XX,t(4;11)(q21.3-q22.1;q23.3),+der(4)t(4;11)(q21.3-q22.1;q23.3)der(13)c [11]KRAS p.G12D
5BCP-ALLCD19+iCD79a+CD22+CD10-/+CD34-CD45+No metaphasest(11;19)(q23;p13)/KMT2A::MLLT1IdenticalIdentical-Leukemic clone persistence
AMLCD19-CD33+CD117+CD34-CD14-CD11c+No metaphasesCBL p.Y371C
6BCP-ALLCD19+iCD79a+CD10-CD45+47,XX,t(4;11)(q21.3-q22.1;q23.3),+22 [6]t(4;11)(q21;q23)/KMT2A::AFF1IdenticalIdenticalNRAS p.G13DLeukemic clone persistence
AMLCD19-iCD79a-iCD22-CD33+CD117+CD64+CD7+56,XX,+X,+der(4)t(4;11)(q21.3-q22.1;q23.3),+der(4)t(4;11)(q21.3-q22.1;q23.3),
+der(6),+der(6),+7,+8,der(11)t(4;11)(q21.3-q22.1;q23.3),+13,+17,+22 [14]/46,XX [1]		NRAS p.G13D
i—intracellular expression.
Table
Table 3. Stability of BCR/TCR markers specific for leukemic clones during blinatumomab treatment.
Table 3. Stability of BCR/TCR markers specific for leukemic clones during blinatumomab treatment.
Patient # Number of Leukemia-Related IG/TCR RearrangementsNumber of Stable IG/TCR RearrangementsFeature of Clonal Evolution
Before and after BlinatumomabCommon **
IGH *IGKIGLTRATRBTRGTRDIGHIGKIGLTRATRBTRGTRD
1prior to blinatumomab300000100000000Clone loss *** + new clones ****
switch after blinatumomab2000212
2prior to blinatumomab100010010001002Leukemic clone persistence *****
switch after blinatumomab1000100
3prior to blinatumomab221000122100016Leukemic clone persistence + new subclone
switch after blinatumomab2210111
4prior to blinatumomab100000000000000Clone loss + new clones
switch after blinatumomab0010000
5prior to blinatumomab200000120000002Leukemic clone persistence
switch after blinatumomab2000000
6prior to blinatumomab110000011000002Leukemic clone persistence
switch after blinatumomab1100000
* BCR/TCR gene family. ** Number of leukemia-related rearrangements common to a leukemic sample before and after blinatumomab treatment. *** Disappearance of leukemic clones with the initial BCR/TCR markers after blinatumomab treatment. **** Emergence of leukemic clones with new BCR/TCR markers after blinatumomab treatment. ***** Retention of clones with initial BCR/TCR markers after blinatumomab treatment.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Semchenkova, A.; Mikhailova, E.; Komkov, A.; Gaskova, M.; Abasov, R.; Matveev, E.; Kazanov, M.; Mamedov, I.; Shmitko, A.; Belova, V.; et al. Lineage Conversion in Pediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Leukemia under Blinatumomab Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23074019

AMA Style

Semchenkova A, Mikhailova E, Komkov A, Gaskova M, Abasov R, Matveev E, Kazanov M, Mamedov I, Shmitko A, Belova V, et al. Lineage Conversion in Pediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Leukemia under Blinatumomab Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(7):4019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23074019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Semchenkova, Alexandra, Ekaterina Mikhailova, Alexander Komkov, Marina Gaskova, Ruslan Abasov, Evgenii Matveev, Marat Kazanov, Ilgar Mamedov, Anna Shmitko, Vera Belova, and et al. 2022. "Lineage Conversion in Pediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Leukemia under Blinatumomab Therapy" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 7: 4019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23074019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop