Next Article in Journal
Plant Serine Protease Inhibitors: Biotechnology Application in Agriculture and Molecular Farming
Next Article in Special Issue
Transgelin, a p53 and PTEN-Upregulated Gene, Inhibits the Cell Proliferation and Invasion of Human Bladder Carcinoma Cells In Vitro and In Vivo
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Light at Night Alleviates the Negative Effect of Pb on Freshwater Ecosystems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms20061344
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Specificity of the Metallothionein-1 Response by Cadmium-Exposed Normal Human Urothelial Cells

by
Rhiannon V. McNeill
1,†,
Andrew S. Mason
1,
Mark E. Hodson
2,
James W.F. Catto
3 and
Jennifer Southgate
1,*
1
Jack Birch Unit for Molecular Carcinogenesis, Department of Biology, York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
2
Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
3
Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(6), 1344; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061344
Submission received: 29 January 2019 / Revised: 12 March 2019 / Accepted: 13 March 2019 / Published: 17 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic, Prognostic and Predictive Biological Markers in Bladder Cancer – Illumination of a Vision 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Occupational and environmental exposure to cadmium is associated with the development of urothelial cancer. The metallothionein (MT) family of genes encodes proteins that sequester metal ions and modulate physiological processes, including zinc homeostasis. Little is known about the selectivity of expression of the different MT isoforms. Here, we examined the effect of cadmium exposure on MT gene and isoform expression by normal human urothelial (NHU) cell cultures. Baseline and cadmium-induced MT gene expression was characterized by next-generation sequencing and RT-PCR; protein expression was assessed by Western blotting using isoform-specific antibodies. Expression of the zinc transporter-1 (SLC30A1) gene was also assessed. NHU cells displayed transcription of MT-2A, but neither MT-3 nor MT-4 genes. Most striking was a highly inducer-specific expression of MT-1 genes, with cadmium inducing transcription of MT-1A, MT-1G, MT-1H, and MT-1M. Whereas MT-1G was also induced by zinc and nickel ions and MT-1H by iron, both MT-1A and MT-1M were highly cadmium-specific, which was confirmed for protein using isoform-specific antibodies. Protein but not transcript endured post-exposure, probably reflecting sequestration. SLC30A1 transcription was also affected by cadmium ion exposure, potentially reflecting perturbation of intracellular zinc homeostasis. We conclude that human urothelium displays a highly inductive profile of MT-1 gene expression, with two isoforms identified as highly specific to cadmium, providing candidate transcript and long-lived protein biomarkers of cadmium exposure.

1. Introduction

Occupational and environmental exposure to cadmium has increased as a result of the burning of fossil fuels and widespread use of the “heavy” metal in anthropological activities, such as battery production, electroplating, smelting, and soldering (reviewed [1]). Cadmium ions accumulate in the body in an almost irreversible manner [2], as the metal cannot be metabolized to a less toxic species [3] and has a low excretion rate [4]. This low excretion rate is thought to be due to intracellular sequestration of cadmium ions by metal-binding proteins [5,6,7]. An association between cadmium exposure and bladder (urothelial) carcinogenesis has been reported, with higher cadmium concentrations demonstrated in the blood [8] and urine [9,10,11] of patients with bladder cancer. In vitro research supports these correlative studies, with malignant transformation of the immortalized RWPE-1, TLR1215, 16HBE, and UROtsa cell lines reported after extended chronic cadmium exposure [12,13,14,15]. The bladder stores concentrated urine prior to voiding, meaning that the urothelial lining of the bladder (which functions as one of the tightest epithelial barriers [16]) is potentially exposed to excreted xenobiotics [16,17,18]. It is currently not known whether exposure to urinary cadmium is limited by the presence of an intact urinary barrier.
The metallothioneins (MTs) are a superfamily of low-molecular weight (~6 kDa), cysteine-rich proteins that are induced by and bind a range of metal ions, including cadmium [19,20]. Through this sequestration of metal ions MTs are considered to play a primary role in metal detoxification [21,22], but also metal (e.g., zinc) homeostasis [23,24,25] and the scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [26,27]. MT involvement in the bodily response to cadmium exposure has been well-documented, with numerous studies demonstrating cadmium-induced MT expression both in vitro [28,29,30,31,32,33,34] and in vivo [35,36].
Direct binding of MT protein to cadmium ions [37,38] results in a MT-cadmium complex that is highly resistant to degradation [5,6,7]. In humans, four main MT subfamilies exist (MT-1, MT-2/2A, MT-3, and MT-4), with MT-1 consisting of nine isoforms (-A, -B, -E, -F, -G, -H, -L, -M, and -X) [39] each encoded on individual genes. It is predicted that the individual MT isoforms have distinct properties including structure [40,41], tissue- and inducer-specific expression [22,34,42,43,44,45,46,47], induction rate [48], translational efficiency [41], and degradation rate [49,50]. Cadmium is reported to be the most potent inducer of MT expression [51]. This offers the potential that individual MT isoforms may be utilized as specific biomarkers of human exposure to cadmium, although it remains unclear which isoform(s) are responsible for cadmium sequestration. This lack of discrimination is largely due to the high homology between isoforms and the lack of discriminatory reagents, with no validated antibodies able to distinguish MT-1 and MT-2 subfamilies, nor the different MT-1 isoforms [41,52].
MTs are reported to work cooperatively with zinc transporters to regulate cellular zinc homeostasis, potentially by modulating cellular zinc ion concentration [39], although the exact mechanisms are unknown. Thus, a possible consequence of exposure to cadmium ions may be altered cellular zinc homeostasis. Cadmium and zinc possess highly similar properties, and it has been shown that cadmium can substitute for zinc in biological systems [53]. This can disrupt the normal functioning of various biological pathways [54,55], thus indirectly influencing processes involved in carcinogenesis such as cell proliferation and metastasis [56].
Our aims were to investigate MT isoform expression and specificity of induction in human urothelium under baseline and cadmium-exposed conditions, using a well-characterized normal human urothelial (NHU) cell culture system that includes polarized differentiated NHU cell sheets possessing tight barrier function [57,58]. Prior to cadmium exposure, cellular growth assays were performed to assess cytotoxicity. Next, we exposed NHU cells to a variety of potential MT inducers, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) [59,60], essential metals [44,61,62,63,64,65,66], and heavy metals [67,68,69,70] to define the specificity of response. Previously unpublished MT-1 isoform-specific antibodies were used to discriminate between MT-1 isoform proteins. Lastly, we determined whether transcription of the free zinc efflux regulator zinc transporter-1 (SLC30A1) [71] was altered as a consequence of cadmium exposure. The results revealed that MT isoform expression was inducer-specific, and that abundance of both MT-1A and MT-1M transcript and protein was highly cadmium-specific, highlighting their potential as biomarkers of exposure. Cadmium was able to penetrate an intact urothelial barrier and effected transcriptional upregulation of SLC30A1, indicating a potential route for cadmium uptake and possible subsequent substitution in zinc homeostatic mechanisms.

2. Results

2.1. Influence of Cadmium on NHU Cell Culture Growth and Uptake of Cadmium across an Intact Urothelial Barrier

Exposure of nondifferentiated NHU cells to cadmium revealed that cell growth was unaffected by concentrations ≤ 10 µM CdCl2 whilst exposure to 20 µM CdCl2 resulted in distinct cytotoxicity (Figure 1A). Replication in a second independent cell line confirmed that exposure to 10 µM CdCl2 did not affect NHU cell growth (Figure 1B); this concentration was therefore selected for further experiments. When differentiated NHU cell cultures (three independent cell lines) were grown on permeable membranes in triplicate and exposed apically to 10 µM CdCl2 for 72 h, no effect was seen on barrier function (control versus cadmium-exposed transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of 3.24 ± 0.48 kΩ.cm2 versus 3.17 ± 0.52 kΩ.cm2, mean ± SEM; p = 0.93; Table S1). The barrier was retained during CdCl2 exposures of at least seven days, over which time the TEER increased in the cadmium-exposed culture to 1.8-fold over control. Analysis of cell lysates by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) revealed an intracellular cadmium concentration of 0.94 μM in lysates from cadmium-exposed cultures compared to 0.08 μM for control cultures.

2.2. Baseline and Cadmium-Induced MT Transcription in NHU Cells

NHU cells maintained in culture in nondifferentiated and differentiated states were examined for baseline expression of MT genes. Analysis by mRNA-seq of nondifferentiated NHU cells revealed high expression of MT-1E and MT-1X and low expression of MT-1A, MT-1B, MT-1F, and MT-1G; there was no detection of MT-1H or MT-1M transcripts (Figure 2A). MT-2A expression was three times greater than all the MT-1 genes combined. No expression was detected for MT-3 or MT-4. In almost all cases where MT gene expression was detected in nondifferentiated NHU cells, the expression was reduced in the differentiated state. This was most striking for MT-2A (log2FC = 4.2; q = 4.08 × 10−3) and MT-1E (log2FC = 1.5; q = 4.0 × 10−4), although between-donor variation prohibited statistical significance for many genes with lower expression. The apparent exception was MT-1X, where the average expression increased in the differentiated state. However, this was inconsistent between donors, and the differential expression was nonsignificant. Interestingly, MT-1L (which generates a transcript with a premature stop codon [72]) was expressed at similar abundance to MT-1E in the nondifferentiated cells, but with a much greater downregulation in the differentiated state (log2FC = 5.4; q = 8.4 × 10−4). Previous reports of a truncation-rescuing polymorphism [73] was not identified in these donors, so while MT-1L is unlikely to form a functional protein, it may play a role in MT-1 transcript regulation. Expression was detected for SLC30A1 in both nondifferentiated and differentiated states (Figure 2A), but there was no significant differentiation-associated change in expression.
RT-PCR results supported the NGS data, although the variability in transcript detection in nondifferentiated NHU cells indicated a potentially inducible state (Figure 2B). Differentiated NHU cell cultures revealed a more consistent baseline expression of several MT-1 genes, particularly MT-1X (Figure 2C).
Exposure to cadmium ions caused a massive induction of all eight MT-1 genes (MT-1A, MT-1B, MT-1E, MT-1F, MT-1G, MT-1H, MT-1M, and MT-1X) within 12 h of initial exposure, as demonstrated by the RT-PCR results, with expression receding over time (Figure 2B,C). Whereas expression of MT-1 transcripts was mostly lost after 48 h of continuous cadmium exposure in nondifferentiated cell cultures (Figure 2B with independent cell line repeats in supplementary Figures S1 and S2), MT-1 subfamily transcript expression was still detectable in differentiated cell cultures after 72 h exposure (Figure 2C; with independent repeats in supplementary Figures S3 and S4).
Irrespective of differentiation state and the presence or absence of cadmium, MT-2A transcript expression was constitutively high, whilst MT-3 and MT-4 transcripts were invariably absent. Based on this, the MT-2A, MT-3, and MT-4 genes were not further studied. By contrast, the strong induction of the MT-1A, -1G, -1H, and -1M paralogs, which was consistent following cadmium exposure in three independent NHU cell lines, was further investigated for specificity. As the RT-PCR results demonstrated a striking on/off transcriptional response of these MT-1 isoforms to cadmium exposure, it was decided to continue with this approach, as quantitative PCR would not have added anything to the data.

2.3. Specificity of Cadmium-Induced MT Transcription

NHU cell cultures were exposed to a variety of candidate MT inducers identified from the literature.
ROS is reported as a by-product of cadmium exposure [59], and therefore we sought to determine the effects of ROS on transcription of MT-1 genes. The ROS-inducing agent sulforaphane (C6H11NOS2) and ROS-inhibitor ascorbic acid (C6H8O6) were titrated against transcription of the ROS-sensitive heme oxygenase-1 (HMOX1) gene [74,75] to infer intracellular ROS activity (Figure 3A,B, respectively). Induction of expression of the four MT-1 genes in response to cadmium exposure was unaffected by 25 µg/mL ascorbic acid used to inhibit ROS, suggesting that ROS was not responsible (Figure 3C). This conclusion was supported by the failure of 5 µM sulforaphane to induce MT-1 expression (replicate in supplementary material, Figure S5).
Differential induction of MT-1 paralogs was examined in response to other metal ions, both essential and carcinogenic (replicates in supplementary material, Figures S6 and S7). Both zinc and nickel exposure induced MT-1G transcription, whereas MT-1H transcript expression was only minimally induced by zinc, and nickel had no effect. MT-1A transcription was constitutively low under all conditions apart from cadmium exposure, which increased expression, and MT-1M transcription was highly induced by exposure to cadmium alone.

2.4. Immunoblotting With Isoform-Specific Antibodies

To examine if the observed induction of MT-1 gene expression translated to protein, antibodies specific to the MT-1A and MT-1M isoforms were used to perform Western blotting. Control nondifferentiated NHU cells lacked MT-1A and MT-1M protein expression (Figure 4A). Cadmium exposure caused induction of both MT-1A and MT-1M proteins after 72 h (replicate in supplementary material, Figure S8). Both proteins were also induced in cadmium-exposed differentiated NHU cells (Figure 4B; replicated in supplementary material, Figure S9).
The specificity of MT-1A and MT-1M protein induction was examined in response to the wider range of candidate inducers. Western blotting revealed that the MT-1M isoform was induced only by cadmium exposure, supporting the RT-PCR results (Figure 4C; replicated in supplementary material, Figure S10). MT-1A protein expression was highly induced by cadmium exposure, although low protein expression was observed under other conditions. As assessed by densitometry, only cadmium was capable of increasing MT-1A protein expression over control, resulting in a ~6-fold increase in MT-1A protein expression (Figure 4D).

2.5. Upregulation of Zinc Transporter-1 (SLC30A1) Transcription in Cadmium-Exposed NHU Cells

RT-PCR of both nondifferentiated and differentiated NHU cells revealed that cadmium exposure resulted in increased SLC30A1 gene transcription compared to unexposed controls (Figure 5A; replicated in supplementary material, Figure S11). After cessation of exposure, SLC30A1 transcript expression receded over time, and this decrease was observed to occur most rapidly in nondifferentiated (after 24 h; Figure 3B) compared to differentiated (after 11 days; Figure 5C) cell cultures.

3. Discussion

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to investigate if cadmium exposure affects urothelial tight barrier function. Previous studies have examined the effect of cadmium exposure on renal [76] and bronchial [77] epithelia, with both studies reporting a decrease or complete collapse of barrier function. By contrast, the results from this study showed that urothelial barrier function was retained and even tightened. This may reflect the type of epithelium being tested, as urothelial cells are known to form one of the tightest epithelial barriers in the human body and thus may be unique in their resistance to cadmium. Although cadmium did not compromise urothelial barrier function, our results found that apical exposure induced expression of MT-1 isoforms in underlying NHU cells and using ICP-OES, cadmium was directly detected in differentiated urothelial cell sheets. Taken together, these results indicate that the urothelium remains intact and may even mount a protective response to cadmium in terms of tight junction tightening, yet the heavy metal is still able to penetrate the urothelial barrier.
Also for the first time, we describe specific MT gene expression by normal human urothelium. Our results are consistent with previous reports in other tissues that MT-1 is the inducible subfamily [22,40,78] whereas MT-2A is the most widely expressed isoform, accounting for up to 50 % total MT expression in humans [6,79]. In agreement with the consensus that MT-3 is neural-restricted [80], we found no baseline expression and no agents that could induce MT-3 transcription in urothelial cells. As an anomaly, one group has previously suggested a link between heavy metal exposure, MT-3 induction, and urothelial carcinogenesis based on high MT-3 expression in malignant bladder cancer [81]. This group further supported their findings using in vitro studies in cadmium-transformed UROtsa cells [82,83]. However, we were not able to replicate those findings in our normal cell system.
Of the MT-1 gene family, transcription of MT-1F and MT-1G has previously been described as constitutive in human umbilical vein epithelial cells (HUVEC) under baseline conditions [42]. Both these genes exhibited low basal but inducible expression in NHU cells, therefore it cannot be certain whether the expression differences between tissues are constitutive, or perhaps due to inducers present in the culture medium. Whereas we found the majority of MT-1 gene paralogs to be inducible by cadmium exposure, transcript expression was transient, presumably due to sequestration leaving fewer free cadmium ions to maintain induction. By contrast, expression of MT-1 proteins was more stable and in line with the sequestering nature of the formed MT-cadmium complex. Previously, MT-1 protein isoform detection has been performed using mass spectrometry [41], but the demonstrated availability of specific antibodies now opens the door to detection using immunochemical approaches.
Exposure of proliferating NHU cell cultures to a range of divalent metal ions revealed differential and inducer-specific induction of MT-1 isoforms. For example, zinc ions induced strong transcription of MT-1G, but not MT-1A genes, whereas nickel ions caused MT-1G expression exclusively. Inducer-specific expression of MT-1 genes has been noted in other cell types [34,44,45,46,47], supporting the hypothesis that individual isoforms have very selective metal ion sequestering functions [5,6,22,39,40,84]. Western blotting revealed that cadmium was the most potent inducer of MT-1A protein expression, whereas MT-1M protein expression was highly specific to cadmium, revealing the potential of both as biomarkers of cadmium exposure. Neither arsenic nor nickel induced MT-1A or MT-1M protein expression, further demonstrating the specificity of MT-1 isoforms to differentiate between different nongenotoxic carcinogenic metals [85,86].
Alongside a pathophysiological role in sequestering carcinogenic metals, the MTs are considered to contribute to the normal homeostasis of zinc, which as a cofactor involved in many key cellular processes [56] is under tight control. MT sequestration and zinc transporter efflux coordinated by a common transcription factor MTF-1 [87] is thought to regulate the availability of zinc [88,89,90,91]. Changes in intracellular zinc concentration have been associated with tumor growth and progression [92]. The displacement of zinc from the proteome by cadmium may affect the intracellular concentration and/or availability of zinc ions and can substitute and destabilize the functional sites of zinc-containing proteins, such as zinc-finger transcription factors, changing the character and/or rendering them nonfunctional [54,55].
Preliminary investigation into the effect of cadmium exposure on zinc homeostasis in normal urothelial cells revealed an upregulation of the zinc transporter-1 (SLC30A1) gene transcript in nondifferentiated NHU cells. SLC30A1 upregulation was also observed in cadmium-exposed differentiated NHU cell sheets possessing a functional barrier, further suggesting that cadmium can penetrate an intact urothelial barrier. Our results agree with a previous study using the human hepatic HepG2 cell line, which demonstrated increased SLC30A1 protein expression and localization at the cell membrane after acute cadmium exposure [93]. A later study showed cadmium exposure resulted in a 93% increase in the intracellular labile zinc concentration, suggesting a large displacement of zinc ions from the proteome, possibly due to substitution by cadmium [94].
MT expression is often seen as a ‘double-edged sword’, as on the one hand it functions to protect the cell, but by the same mechanisms can also facilitate malignant events [6,22,95,96]. MTs may contribute to cell survival by increasing resistance to ROS-induced apoptosis [97] and increasing cellular proliferation [32]. Cadmium exposure can result in inhibition of DNA repair [98], which coupled with increased cellular protection via cadmium-induced MT expression, increases the probability of deleterious cells surviving and passing on defects to their progeny [96]. The ability of MT to counteract ROS could also play a role in chemotherapy resistance, and high expression of MT has been correlated with treatment resistance in bladder cancer [99,100]. Specifically, after radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy 100% patients with high tumor MT expression progressed within nine months, whereas in patients with low MT expression only 65% had progressed after five years [101].
Our study supports a concordant induction of MT isoforms and SLC30A1 transcription in response to cadmium exposure. Whereas this does not directly contradict hypotheses that cadmium exposure increases cellular zinc concentration or that cellular zinc homeostasis is maintained through the cooperative regulation of MT and zinc transporters [39], it does proffer a more direct relationship with cadmium responsible for regulating SLC30A1 expression. This may reveal new insight as to the role of cadmium in (bladder) cancer, where previously reported SLC30A1 and MT changes may reflect increased concentrations of intracellular cadmium rather than zinc. Our demonstration of differential MT-1 gene paralog induction by zinc and cadmium should help design future (e.g., knockout) experiments to clarify the respective roles. Further experiments might also directly quantify intracellular zinc in NHU cells after cadmium exposure and determine the consequences of cadmium on zinc homeostasis and dysregulated cadmium-substituted proteins.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. NHU Cell Culture and Exposure to Cadmium and Other Agents

Normal human urothelial (NHU) cells were obtained from the ureter/renal pelvis of patients undergoing urological surgery, and maintained in vitro as nonimmortalized cell lines, as detailed elsewhere [57,102]. For routine culture, NHU cells were grown as adherent monolayers on Primaria™ plasticware (BD Biosciences, Wokingham, UK) in low calcium [0.09 mM] keratinocyte serum-free medium (KSFM) containing bovine pituitary extract and recombinant epidermal growth factor (Fisher Scientific UK Ltd, Loughborough, UK) supplemented with 30 ng/mL cholera toxin (KSFMc). NHU cell lines were subcultured by trypsinization at just-confluence and used in experiments between passages 3–5.
For cadmium exposure, medium was replaced with fresh medium containing 10 µM cadmium chloride (CdCl2). This concentration was selected after preliminary titration for toxicity (Figure 1A,B). For other treatment agents, concentrations were selected following initial titration and target gene expression assessment (Figure 3A,B).
Nonimmortalized NHU cell lines retain the capacity to differentiate to form a functional tight barrier epithelium [58]. Differentiation was induced by switching NHU cells into medium supplemented with 5% adult bovine serum for 5 days before subculture onto semipermeable ThinCert™ (Greiner Bio-One Ltd., Stonehouse, UK) membranes with 0.4-µm pore size. After 24 h, the exogenous calcium (Ca2+) concentration was increased to 2 mM (near physiological) and cultures were maintained for a further 7–9 days to develop a tight barrier. For cadmium exposure of differentiated NHU cell cultures, medium was removed from the apical chamber after establishment of a barrier >1000 Ω.cm2 (see below) and replaced with fresh medium supplemented with 10 µM CdCl2, in order to mimic apical exposure. RNA and protein were then harvested from these membranes for further analysis.

4.2. Measurement of Transepithelial Electrical Resistance

The barrier function of differentiated NHU cell sheets was assessed in triplicate cultures by measuring the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) using an EVOM™ voltohmmeter (World Precision Instruments, Hertfordshire, UK), as described [103]. A blank (no cell) membrane measurement was subtracted from each TEER reading.

4.3. MT Transcript Abundance Quantification by Next-Generation Sequencing

mRNA-seq data for three donor-matched NHU cultured nondifferentiated and differentiated samples were previously generated by our group [104]. Sequencing reads were ‘pseudoaligned’ to the Ensembl v.91 human transcriptome (GRCh38.p10) using kallisto v0.44.0 [105] and relative gene abundance was calculated as transcripts per million (TPM) following gene-level aggregation with tximport v1.8.0 [106]. Differentiation-associated expression changes in the MT gene family were detected by a differential expression analysis conducted by sleuth [107] accounting for matched-donor samples. Differentially-expressed genes are reported with their log2 transformed fold change (log2FC) and ‘q’ value (Benjamini–Hochberg correction).

4.4. Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

RT-PCR was performed to observe actual patterns of MT isoform induction (rather than relative change). RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol® (Fisher Scientific UK Ltd., Loughborough, UK) and treated with a DNA-free™ kit (Ambion, supplied by Fisher Scientific UK Ltd., Loughborough, UK). cDNA synthesis was performed on 1 µg RNA with random hexamers and the SuperScript®II First-Strand Synthesis System (Fisher Scientific UK Ltd., Loughborough, UK). PCR primers were designed specifically to detect all known splice variants for each MT-1 isoform gene, with GAPDH used as the internal transcript control [108]. Primer sequences and optimized PCR conditions are provided in Table 1. PCR was carried out in a T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Services UK Ltd., Hemel Hempstead Hertfordshire, UK) using 25 reaction cycles. Controls consisted of genomic DNA (gDNA as template positive control), water (no template control), and no reverse transcriptase (gDNA negative control). PCR products were separated on 2 % (w/v) agarose gels, stained using SYBR® Safe DNA gel stain (Invitrogen supplied by Fisher Scientific UK Ltd., Loughborough, UK) and visualized on a Gene Genius Gel Imaging System (Syngene, Cambridge, UK).

4.5. Western Blotting

NHU cell cultures were lysed into electrophoresis sample buffer containing protease inhibitors and sonicated. Twenty micrograms of protein was resolved on 4–12% Bis-Tris NuPage™ polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen) in 2-(N-morphilino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffer and electro-transferred onto polyvinylfluoride membranes (Millipore). Membranes were blocked with Odyssey® blocking buffer (LI-COR Biotechnology OK Ltd., Cambridge, UK), incubated with primary antibodies for 16 h at 4 °C and bound antibody detected using Alexa Fluor® 680-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Invitrogen supplied by Fisher Scientific UK Ltd., Loughborough, UK) or an IRDye 800-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Tebu-Bio, Peterborough, UK). Antibody binding was visualized using an Odyssey® Sa Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR®). Protein quantification was performed using Odyssey® Image Studio™ software v5.0 (LI-COR®). Details of antibodies are given Table 2 and Table 3.

5. Conclusions

MT-1 isoform expression has been characterized in normal human urothelium for the first time, and a unique expression profile described with the use of isoform-specific antibodies. Individual MT-1 genes demonstrated inducer-specific expression and two paralogs with cadmium-specific or -selective induction were identified as candidate biomarkers of cadmium exposure. With the potential for cadmium to interfere and substitute in the homeostatic regulation of zinc, new approaches are proposed for understanding cadmium-induced nongenotoxic carcinogenesis.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/6/1344/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.V.M., M.H., J.W.F.C., and J.S.; Methodology, R.V.M., M.H, A.S.M., and J.W.F.C.; Software, R.V.M. and A.S.M.; Validation, R.V.M. and J.S.; Formal Analysis, R.V.M. and A.S.M.; Investigation, R.V.M.; Resources, M.H., J.W.F.C., and J.S.; Data Curation, R.V.M. and J.S.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, R.V.M.; Writing—Review and Editing, A.S.M, J.W.F.C., and J.S..; Visualization, R.V.M. and J.S.; Supervision, J.S.; Project Administration, R.V.M. and J.S.; Funding Acquisition, J.W.F.C and J.S.

Funding

This work was funded by Yorkshire Cancer Research (YCR) through a studentship award to R.V.M. Additional support was provided by York Against Cancer (YAC).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

HMOX1Heme oxygenase-1
MTMetallothionein
NHUNormal human urothelial
SLC30A1Solute carrier family A member 1
TEERTrans-epithelial electrical resistance

References

  1. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy Metals Toxicity and the Environment. EXS 2012, 101, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  2. Feki-Tounsi, M.; Hamza-Chaffai, A. Cadmium as a possible cause of bladder cancer: A review of accumulated evidence. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 10561–10573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Waalkes, M.P. Cadmium carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res. 2003, 533, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Toxicological Profile for Cadmium. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=48&tid=15 (accessed on 14 September 2016).
  5. Coyle, P.; Philcox, J.C.; Carey, L.C.; Rofe, A.M. Metallothionein: The multipurpose protein. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2002, 59, 627–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sigel, A.; Sigel, H.; Sigel, R.K.O. Metallothioneins and Related Chelators; Metal Ions in Life Sciences; RSC Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2009; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Klaassen, C.D.; Choudhuri, S.; McKim, J.M.; Lehman-McKeeman, L.D.; Kershaw, W.C. In vitro and in vivo studies on the degradation of metallothionein. Environ. Health Perspect. 1994, 102, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Kellen, E.; Zeegers, M.P.; Hond, E.D.; Buntinx, F. Blood cadmium may be associated with bladder carcinogenesis: The Belgian case-control study on bladder cancer. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2007, 31, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wolf, C.; Strenziok, R.; Kyriakopoulos, A. Elevated metallothionein-bound cadmium concentrations in urine from bladder carcinoma patients, investigated by size exclusion chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 631, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feki-Tounsi, M.; Olmedo, P.; Gil, F.; Khlifi, R.; Mhiri, M.-N.; Rebai, A.; Hamza-Chaffai, A. Cadmium in blood of Tunisian men and risk of bladder cancer: Interactions with arsenic exposure and smoking. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2013, 20, 7204–7213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chang, C.-H.; Liu, C.-S.; Liu, H.-J.; Huang, C.-P.; Huang, C.-Y.; Hsu, H.-T.; Liou, S.-H.; Chung, C.-J. Association between levels of urinary heavy metals and increased risk of urothelial carcinoma. Int. J. Urol. 2016, 23, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Achanzar, W.E.; Diwan, B.A.; Liu, J.; Quader, S.T.; Webber, M.M.; Waalkes, M.P. Cadmium-induced Malignant Transformation of Human Prostate Epithelial Cells. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 455–458. [Google Scholar]
  13. Takiguchi, M.; Achanzar, W.E.; Qu, W.; Li, G.; Waalkes, M.P. Effects of cadmium on DNA-(Cytosine-5) methyltransferase activity and DNA methylation status during cadmium-induced cellular transformation. Exp. Cell Res. 2003, 286, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lei, Y.-X.; Wei, L.; Wang, M.; Wu, G.-R.; Li, M. Malignant transformation and abnormal expression of eukaryotic initiation factor in bronchial epithelial cells induced by cadmium chloride. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2008, 21, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sens, D.A.; Park, S.; Gurel, V.; Sens, M.A.; Garrett, S.H.; Somji, S. Inorganic Cadmium- and Arsenite-Induced Malignant Transformation of Human Bladder Urothelial Cells. Toxicol. Sci. 2004, 79, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kreft, M.E.; Hudoklin, S.; Jezernik, K.; Romih, R. Formation and maintenance of blood–urine barrier in urothelium. Protoplasma 2010, 246, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Caldwell, J.; Gardner, I.; Swales, N. An Introduction to Drug Disposition: The Basic Principles of Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion. Toxicol. Pathol. 1995, 23, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Krause, M.; Rak-Raszewska, A.; Pietilä, I.; Quaggin, S.E.; Vainio, S. Signaling during Kidney Development. Cells 2015, 4, 112–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Margoshes, M.; Vallee, B.L. A Cadmium Protein from Equine Kidney Cortex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 4813–4814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kägi, J.H.; Schäffer, A. Biochemistry of metallothionein. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 8509–8515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hunt, C.T.; Boulanger, Y.; Fesik, S.W.; Armitage, I.M. NMR analysis of the structure and metal sequestering properties of metallothioneins. Environ. Health Perspect. 1984, 54, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Capdevila, M.; Bofill, R.; Palacios, Ò.; Atrian, S. State-of-the-art of metallothioneins at the beginning of the 21st century. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 46–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dalton, T.; Fu, K.; Palmiter, R.D.; Andrews, G.K. Transgenic mice that overexpress metallothionein-I resist dietary zinc deficiency. J. Nutr. 1996, 126, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kelly, E.J.; Quaife, C.J.; Froelick, G.J.; Palmiter, R.D. Metallothionein I and II protect against zinc deficiency and zinc toxicity in mice. J. Nutr. 1996, 126, 1782–1790. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, D.K.; Geiser, J.; Dufner-Beattie, J.; Andrews, G.K. Pancreatic metallothionein-I may play a role in zinc homeostasis during maternal dietary zinc deficiency in mice. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Penkowa, M.; Cáceres, M.; Borup, R.; Nielsen, F.C.; Poulsen, C.B.; Quintana, A.; Molinero, A.; Carrasco, J.; Florit, S.; Giralt, M.; et al. Novel roles for metallothionein-I + II (MT-I + II) in defense responses, neurogenesis, and tissue restoration after traumatic brain injury: Insights from global gene expression profiling in wild-type and MT-I + II knockout mice. J. Neurosci. Res. 2006, 84, 1452–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lazo, J.S.; Kondo, Y.; Dellapiazza, D.; Michalska, A.E.; Choo, K.H.; Pitt, B.R. Enhanced sensitivity to oxidative stress in cultured embryonic cells from transgenic mice deficient in metallothionein I and II genes. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 5506–5510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Karin, M.; Haslinger, A.; Holtgreve, H.; Richards, R.I.; Krauter, P.; Westphal, H.M.; Beato, M. Characterization of DNA sequences through which cadmium and glucocorticoid hormones induce human metallothionein-IIA gene. Nature 1984, 308, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schulkens, I.A.; Castricum, K.C.M.; Weijers, E.M.; Koolwijk, P.; Griffioen, A.W.; Thijssen, V.L. Expression, regulation and function of human metallothioneins in endothelial cells. J. Vasc. Res. 2014, 51, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yap, X.; Tan, H.-Y.; Huang, J.; Lai, Y.; Yip, G.W.-C.; Tan, P.-H.; Bay, B.-H. Over-expression of metallothionein predicts chemoresistance in breast cancer. J. Pathol. 2009, 217, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Z.-M.; van Hasselt, C.A.; Song, F.-Z.; Vlantis, A.C.; Cherian, M.G.; Koropatnick, J.; Chen, G.G. Expression of functional metallothionein isoforms in papillary thyroid cancer. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2009, 302, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ioachim, E.E.; Charchanti, A.V.; Stavropoulos, N.E.; Athanassiou, E.D.; Michael, M.C.; Agnantis, N.J. Localization of metallothionein in urothelial carcinoma of the human urinary bladder: An immunohistochemical study including correlation with HLA-DR antigen, p53, and proliferation indices. Anticancer Res. 2001, 21, 1757–1761. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Jin, R.; Chow, V.T.-K.; Tan, P.-H.; Dheen, S.T.; Duan, W.; Bay, B.-H. Metallothionein 2A expression is associated with cell proliferation in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 2002, 23, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Varshney, U.; Jahroudi, N.; Foster, R.; Gedamu, L. Structure, organization, and regulation of human metallothionein IF gene: Differential and cell-type-specific expression in response to heavy metals and glucocorticoids. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1986, 6, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Boonprasert, K.; Ruengweerayut, R.; Aunpad, R.; Satarug, S.; Na-Bangchang, K. Expression of metallothionein isoforms in peripheral blood leukocytes from Thai population residing in cadmium-contaminated areas. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2012, 34, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mita, M.; Satoh, M.; Shimada, A.; Okajima, M.; Azuma, S.; Suzuki, J.S.; Sakabe, K.; Hara, S.; Himeno, S. Metallothionein is a crucial protective factor against Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric erosive lesions in a mouse model. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 294, G877–G884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kägi, J.H.; Kojima, Y. Chemistry and biochemistry of metallothionein. Exp. Suppl. 1987, 52, 25–61. [Google Scholar]
  38. Irvine, G.W.; Pinter, T.B.J.; Stillman, M.J. Defining the metal binding pathways of human metallothionein 1a: Balancing zinc availability and cadmium seclusion. Metallomics 2016, 8, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kimura, T.; Kambe, T. The Functions of Metallothionein and ZIP and ZnT Transporters: An Overview and Perspective. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Miles, A.T.; Hawksworth, G.M.; Beattie, J.H.; Rodilla, V. Induction, Regulation, Degradation, and Biological Significance of Mammalian Metallothioneins. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2000, 35, 35–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mehus, A.A.; Muhonen, W.W.; Garrett, S.H.; Somji, S.; Sens, D.A.; Shabb, J.B. Quantitation of Human Metallothionein Isoforms: A Family of Small, Highly Conserved, Cysteine-rich Proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2014, 13, 1020–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Conway, D.E.; Lee, S.; Eskin, S.G.; Shah, A.K.; Jo, H.; McIntire, L.V. Endothelial metallothionein expression and intracellular free zinc levels are regulated by shear stress. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 2010, 299, C1461–C1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Jahroudi, N.; Foster, R.; Price-Haughey, J.; Beitel, G.; Gedamu, L. Cell-type specific and differential regulation of the human metallothionein genes. Correlation with DNA methylation and chromatin structure. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 6506–6511. [Google Scholar]
  44. Miura, N.; Koizumi, S. Heavy metal responses of the human metallothionein isoform genes. J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 2007, 127, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Richards, R.I.; Heguy, A.; Karin, M. Structural and functional analysis of the human metallothionein-IA gene: Differential induction by metal ions and glucocorticoids. Cell 1984, 37, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Selvaraj, A.; Balamurugan, K.; Yepiskoposyan, H.; Zhou, H.; Egli, D.; Georgiev, O.; Thiele, D.J.; Schaffner, W. Metal-responsive transcription factor (MTF-1) handles both extremes, copper load and copper starvation, by activating different genes. Genes Dev. 2005, 19, 891–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Sims, H.I.; Chirn, G.-W.; Marr, M.T. Single nucleotide in the MTF-1 binding site can determine metal-specific transcription activation. PNAS 2012, 109, 16516–16521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Sadhu, C.; Gedamu, L. Regulation of human metallothionein (MT) genes. Differential expression of MTI-F, MTI-G, and MTII-A genes in the hepatoblastoma cell line (HepG2). J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 2679–2684. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lehman-McKeeman, L.D.; Andrews, G.K.; Klaassen, C.D. Mechanisms of regulation of rat hepatic metallothionein-I and metallothionein-II levels following administration of zinc. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1988, 92, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Klaassen, C.D.; Lehman-McKeeman, L.D. Regulation of the isoforms of metallothionein. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1989, 21, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, J.-H.; Wang, S.-Y.; Kim, I.-C.; Ki, J.-S.; Raisuddin, S.; Lee, J.-S.; Han, K.-N. Cloning of a river pufferfish (Takifugu obscurus) metallothionein cDNA and study of its induction profile in cadmium-exposed fish. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 1251–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jasani, B.; Schmid, K.W. Significance of metallothionein overexpression in human tumours. Histopathology 1997, 31, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chaney, R.L. Cadmium and Zinc. In Trace Elements in Soils; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 409–440. [Google Scholar]
  54. Malgieri, G.; Zaccaro, L.; Leone, M.; Bucci, E.; Esposito, S.; Baglivo, I.; Del Gatto, A.; Russo, L.; Scandurra, R.; Pedone, P.V.; et al. Zinc to cadmium replacement in the A. thaliana SUPERMAN Cys₂ His₂ zinc finger induces structural rearrangements of typical DNA base determinant positions. Biopolymers 2011, 95, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Tang, L.; Qiu, R.; Tang, Y.; Wang, S. Cadmium–zinc exchange and their binary relationship in the structure of Zn-related proteins: A mini review. Metallomics 2014, 6, 1313–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jeong, J.; Eide, D.J. The SLC39 family of zinc transporters. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013, 34, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Southgate, J.; Hutton, K.A.; Thomas, D.F.; Trejdosiewicz, L.K. Normal human urothelial cells in vitro: Proliferation and induction of stratification. Lab. Investig. 1994, 71, 583–594. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Cross, W.R.; Eardley, I.; Leese, H.J.; Southgate, J. A biomimetic tissue from cultured normal human urothelial cells: Analysis of physiological function. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2005, 289, F459–F468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, Y.; Fang, J.; Leonard, S.S.; Rao, K.M.K. Cadmium inhibits the electron transfer chain and induces reactive oxygen species. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004, 36, 1434–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Heyno, E.; Klose, C.; Krieger-Liszkay, A. Origin of cadmium-induced reactive oxygen species production: Mitochondrial electron transfer versus plasma membrane NADPH oxidase. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 687–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Durnam, D.M.; Palmiter, R.D. Induction of metallothionein-I mRNA in cultured cells by heavy metals and iodoacetate: Evidence for gratuitous inducers. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1984, 4, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Alam, J.; Smith, A. Heme-hemopexin-mediated induction of metallothionein gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 16379–16384. [Google Scholar]
  63. Baird, S.K.; Kurz, T.; Brunk, U.T. Metallothionein protects against oxidative stress-induced lysosomal destabilization. Biochem. J. 2006, 394, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Palmiter, R.D. Regulation of metallothionein genes by heavy metals appears to be mediated by a zinc-sensitive inhibitor that interacts with a constitutively active transcription factor, MTF-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 1219–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kheradmand, F.; Nourmohammadi, I.; Modarressi, M.H.; Firoozrai, M.; Ahmadi Faghih, M.A. Differential Gene-Expression of Metallothionein 1M and 1G in Response to Zinc in Sertoli TM4 Cells. Iran Biomed. J. 2010, 14, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Chu, A.; Foster, M.; Ward, S.; Zaman, K.; Hancock, D.; Petocz, P.; Samman, S. Zinc-induced upregulation of metallothionein (MT)-2A is predicted by gene expression of zinc transporters in healthy adults. Genes Nutr. 2015, 10, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chen, L.; Ma, L.; Bai, Q.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wei, Q.; Li, D.; Gao, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Heavy metal-induced metallothionein expression is regulated by specific protein phosphatase 2A complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 22413–22426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Heuchel, R.; Radtke, F.; Georgiev, O.; Stark, G.; Aguet, M.; Schaffner, W. The transcription factor MTF-1 is essential for basal and heavy metal-induced metallothionein gene expression. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 2870–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhou, X.D.; Sens, D.A.; Sens, M.A.; Namburi, V.B.R.K.; Singh, R.K.; Garrett, S.H.; Somji, S. Metallothionein-1 and -2 Expression in Cadmium- or Arsenic-Derived Human Malignant Urothelial Cells and Tumor Heterotransplants and as a Prognostic Indicator in Human Bladder Cancer. Toxicol. Sci. 2006, 91, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Irvine, G.W.; Stillman, M.J. Topographical analysis of As-induced folding of α-MT1a. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 441, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. McMahon, R.J.; Cousins, R.J. Regulation of the zinc transporter ZnT-1 by dietary zinc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 4841–4846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Holloway, A.F.; Stennard, F.A.; West, A.K. Human metallothionein gene MT1L mRNA is present in several human tissues but is unlikely to produce a metallothionein protein. FEBS Lett. 1997, 404, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Hahn, Y.; Lee, B. Human-specific nonsense mutations identified by genome sequence comparisons. Hum. Genet. 2006, 119, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ryter, S.W.; Choi, A.M.K. Heme oxygenase-1: Redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell culture models. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2005, 7, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sarma, S.N.; Kim, Y.-J.; Song, M.; Ryu, J.-C. Induction of apoptosis in human leukemia cells through the production of reactive oxygen species and activation of HMOX1 and Noxa by benzene, toluene, and o-xylene. Toxicology 2011, 280, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Faurskov, B.; Bjerregaard, H.F. Effect of cadmium on active ion transport and cytotoxicity in cultured renal epithelial cells (A6). Toxicol. In Vitro 1997, 11, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cao, X.; Lin, H.; Muskhelishvili, L.; Latendresse, J.; Richter, P.; Heflich, R.H. Tight junction disruption by cadmium in an in vitro human airway tissue model. Respir. Res. 2015, 16, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Thirumoorthy, N.; Manisenthil Kumar, K.-T.; Shyam Sundar, A.; Panayappan, L.; Chatterjee, M. Metallothionein: An overview. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 993–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Raudenska, M.; Gumulec, J.; Podlaha, O.; Sztalmachova, M.; Babula, P.; Eckschlager, T.; Adam, V.; Kizek, R.; Masarik, M. Metallothionein polymorphisms in pathological processes. Metallomics 2013, 6, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Palmiter, R.D.; Findley, S.D.; Whitmore, T.E.; Durnam, D.M. MT-III, a brain-specific member of the metallothionein gene family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 6333–6337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Sens, M.A.; Somji, S.; Lamm, D.L.; Garrett, S.H.; Slovinsky, F.; Todd, J.H.; Sens, D.A. Metallothionein isoform 3 as a potential biomarker for human bladder cancer. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhou, X.D.; Sens, M.A.; Garrett, S.H.; Somji, S.; Park, S.; Gurel, V.; Sens, D.A. Enhanced expression of metallothionein isoform 3 protein in tumor heterotransplants derived from As+3- and Cd+2-transformed human urothelial cells. Toxicol. Sci. 2006, 93, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Somji, S.; Garrett, S.H.; Toni, C.; Zhou, X.D.; Zheng, Y.; Ajjimaporn, A.; Sens, M.A.; Sens, D.A. Differences in the epigenetic regulation of MT-3 gene expression between parental and Cd+2 or As+3 transformed human urothelial cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2011, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Brazão-Silva, M.T.; Rodriguez, M.F.S.; Eisenberg, A.L.A.; Dias, F.L.; de Castro, L.M.; Nunes, F.D.; Faria, P.R.; Cardoso, S.V.; Loyola, A.M.; de Sousa, S.C.O.M. Metallothionein gene expression is altered in oral cancer and may predict metastasis and patient outcomes. Histopathology 2015, 67, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. International Agency for Research on Cancer Beryllium, cadmium, mercury, and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; IARC: Lyon, France, 1993; Volume 58.
  86. Salnikow, K.; An, W.G.; Melillo, G.; Blagosklonny, M.V.; Costa, M. Nickel-induced transformation shifts the balance between HIF-1 and p53 transcription factors. Carcinogenesis 1999, 20, 1819–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Günther, V.; Lindert, U.; Schaffner, W. The taste of heavy metals: Gene regulation by MTF-1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res. 2012, 1823, 1416–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Kimura, T.; Itoh, N.; Andrews, G.K. Mechanisms of Heavy Metal Sensing by Metal Response Element-binding Transcription Factor-1. J. Health Sci. 2009, 55, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Otsuka, F. Molecular Mechanism of the Metallothionein Gene Expression Mediated by Metal-Responsive Transcription Factor 1. J. Health Sci. 2001, 47, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Langmade, S.J.; Ravindra, R.; Daniels, P.J.; Andrews, G.K. The transcription factor MTF-1 mediates metal regulation of the mouse ZnT1 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 34803–34809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Guo, L.; Lichten, L.A.; Ryu, M.-S.; Liuzzi, J.P.; Wang, F.; Cousins, R.J. STAT5-glucocorticoid receptor interaction and MTF-1 regulate the expression of ZnT2 (Slc30a2) in pancreatic acinar cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2818–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Bafaro, E.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Dempski, R.E. The emerging role of zinc transporters in cellular homeostasis and cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Urani, C.; Melchioretto, P.; Gribaldo, L. Regulation of metallothioneins and ZnT-1 transporter expression in human hepatoma cells HepG2 exposed to zinc and cadmium. Toxicol. In Vitro 2010, 24, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Urani, C.; Melchioretto, P.; Bruschi, M.; Fabbri, M.; Sacco, M.G.; Gribaldo, L. Impact of Cadmium on Intracellular Zinc Levels in HepG2 Cells: Quantitative Evaluations and Molecular Effects, Impact of Cadmium on Intracellular Zinc Levels in HepG2 Cells: Quantitative Evaluations and Molecular Effects. BioMed Res. Int. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, e949514. [Google Scholar]
  95. Pedersen, M.Ø.; Larsen, A.; Stoltenberg, M.; Penkowa, M. The role of metallothionein in oncogenesis and cancer prognosis. Prog. Histochem. Cytochem. 2009, 44, 29–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hart, B.A.; Potts, R.J.; Watkin, R.D. Cadmium adaptation in the lung—A double-edged sword? Toxicology 2001, 160, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Eneman, J.D.; Potts, R.J.; Osier, M.; Shukla, G.S.; Lee, C.H.; Chiu, J.-F.; Hart, B.A. Suppressed oxidant-induced apoptosis in cadmium adapted alveolar epithelial cells and its potential involvement in cadmium carcinogenesis. Toxicology 2000, 147, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Potts, R.J.; Bespalov, I.A.; Wallace, S.S.; Melamede, R.J.; Hart, B.A. Inhibition of oxidative DNA repair in cadmium-adapted alveolar epithelial cells and the potential involvement of metallothionein. Toxicology 2001, 161, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Satoh, M.; Kloth, D.M.; Kadhim, S.A.; Chin, J.L.; Naganuma, A.; Imura, N.; Cherian, M.G. Modulation of Both Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity and Drug Resistance in Murine Bladder Tumor by Controlling Metallothionein Synthesis. Cancer Res. 1993, 53, 1829–1832. [Google Scholar]
  100. Wülfing, C.; van Ahlen, H.; Eltze, E.; Piechota, H.; Hertle, L.; Schmid, K.-W. Metallothionein in bladder cancer: Correlation of overexpression with poor outcome after chemotherapy. World J. Urol. 2007, 25, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Yamasaki, Y.; Smith, C.; Weisz, D.; van Huizen, I.; Xuan, J.; Moussa, M.; Stitt, L.; Hideki, S.; Cherian, M.G.; Izawa, J.I. Metallothionein expression as prognostic factor for transitional cell carcinoma of bladder. Urology 2006, 67, 530–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Southgate, J.; Masters, J.R.W.; Trejdosiewicz, L.K. Culture of Human Urothelium. In Culture of Epithelial Cells; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 381–399. ISBN 978-0-471-22120-3. [Google Scholar]
  103. Rubenwolf, P.; Southgate, J. Permeability of differentiated human urothelium in vitro. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 763, 207–222. [Google Scholar]
  104. Fishwick, C.; Higgins, J.; Percival-Alwyn, L.; Hustler, A.; Pearson, J.; Bastkowski, S.; Moxon, S.; Swarbreck, D.; Greenman, C.D.; Southgate, J. Heterarchy of transcription factors driving basal and luminal cell phenotypes in human urothelium. Cell Death Differ. 2017, 24, 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Bray, N.L.; Pimentel, H.; Melsted, P.; Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Soneson, C.; Love, M.I.; Robinson, M.D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: Transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Research 2015, 4, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Pimentel, H.; Bray, N.L.; Puente, S.; Melsted, P.; Pachter, L. Differential analysis of RNA-seq incorporating quantification uncertainty. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 687–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Lobban, E.D.; Smith, B.A.; Hall, G.D.; Harnden, P.; Roberts, P.; Selby, P.J.; Trejdosiewicz, L.K.; Southgate, J. Uroplakin gene expression by normal and neoplastic human urothelium. Am. J. Pathol. 1998, 153, 1957–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 01344 g001 550
Figure 1. Biomass growth assays for in vitro normal human urothelial (NHU) cell cultures exposed to cadmium. AlamarBlue® assays were performed over 7 days on NHU cell cultures seeded at 6 × 104 cells/cm2. (A) NHU cells were exposed to a range of cadmium concentrations from 0 to 20 µM (n = 1 independent cell line). Each data point represents mean percentage reduction in AlamarBlue® ± S.D. from three replicate cultures. (B) NHU cells were exposed to 10 µM CdCl2 for up to 7 days. Data points represent mean percentage reduction in AlamarBlue® ± S.D. from two independent NHU cell lines, each performed in triplicate.
Figure 1. Biomass growth assays for in vitro normal human urothelial (NHU) cell cultures exposed to cadmium. AlamarBlue® assays were performed over 7 days on NHU cell cultures seeded at 6 × 104 cells/cm2. (A) NHU cells were exposed to a range of cadmium concentrations from 0 to 20 µM (n = 1 independent cell line). Each data point represents mean percentage reduction in AlamarBlue® ± S.D. from three replicate cultures. (B) NHU cells were exposed to 10 µM CdCl2 for up to 7 days. Data points represent mean percentage reduction in AlamarBlue® ± S.D. from two independent NHU cell lines, each performed in triplicate.
Ijms 20 01344 g001
Ijms 20 01344 g002 550
Figure 2. Baseline and cadmium-induced MT transcript expression by NHU cells in vitro. (A) Next-generation sequencing data showing baseline MT isoform transcription in nondifferentiated and differentiated NHU cells (n = 3 independent cell lines; standard deviation is shown). (B,C) MT gene expression in NHU cells assessed by RT-PCR. The total cDNA input was 1 µg and PCR reaction products were removed after 25 cycles; GAPDH was included as input control. See Table 1 for primer sequences and product sizes. Note that medium was changed at time T = 0 only and there was no renewal of cadmium over the period. The figure shows results representative of n = 3 independent NHU cell lines. Additional PCR controls included genomic DNA as a positive control and a no-template (H2O) negative control; RT negative samples confirmed absence of genomic contamination. In (B), the result of exposing nondifferentiated NHU cells to different concentrations of cadmium (0–20 μM) for 72 h on MT gene expression is shown. In (C), MT gene expression is shown in differentiated NHU cell cultures following exposure to 10 µM CdCl2 for up to 72 h.
Figure 2. Baseline and cadmium-induced MT transcript expression by NHU cells in vitro. (A) Next-generation sequencing data showing baseline MT isoform transcription in nondifferentiated and differentiated NHU cells (n = 3 independent cell lines; standard deviation is shown). (B,C) MT gene expression in NHU cells assessed by RT-PCR. The total cDNA input was 1 µg and PCR reaction products were removed after 25 cycles; GAPDH was included as input control. See Table 1 for primer sequences and product sizes. Note that medium was changed at time T = 0 only and there was no renewal of cadmium over the period. The figure shows results representative of n = 3 independent NHU cell lines. Additional PCR controls included genomic DNA as a positive control and a no-template (H2O) negative control; RT negative samples confirmed absence of genomic contamination. In (B), the result of exposing nondifferentiated NHU cells to different concentrations of cadmium (0–20 μM) for 72 h on MT gene expression is shown. In (C), MT gene expression is shown in differentiated NHU cell cultures following exposure to 10 µM CdCl2 for up to 72 h.
Ijms 20 01344 g002
Ijms 20 01344 g003 550
Figure 3. Specificity of metallothionein (MT) transcription induction by cadmium. MT gene expression was assessed by RT-PCR in NHU cells exposed to a variety of candidate inducers. The total cDNA input was 1 µg and PCR reaction products were removed after 25 cycles; GAPDH was included as input control. Note that medium was changed at time T = 0 only and there was no renewal of treatments over the period. Additional PCR controls included genomic DNA as a positive control and a no-template (H2O) negative control; RT negative samples confirmed absence of genomic contamination. In (A), nondifferentiated NHU cell cultures were treated with a range of concentrations of sulforaphane (C6H11NOS2) for 12 h, and the effect on transcription of the ROS-sensitive gene HMOX1 assessed in comparison to exposure to 10 µM CdCl2 (n = 1 independent cell line). The concentration of C6H11NOS2 that induced transcription of HMOX1 to a comparable extent to cadmium was selected. In (B), nondifferentiated NHU cell cultures were treated with a range of concentrations of ascorbic acid (C6H8O6) for 12 h in combination with 10 µM CdCl2 and the effect on HMOX1 transcription assessed. The concentration of C6H8O6 that caused the biggest decrease in HMOX1 transcription was selected. In (C), NHU cell cultures (n = 2 independent cell lines) were exposed to a range of candidate regulators and transcript expression was assessed for the MT-1 genes shown above to be most sensitive to cadmium induction (from Figure 2B,C). Candidate inducers tested were cadmium (10 µM CdCl2), cadmium combined with ascorbic acid (10 µM CdCl2 + 25 µg/mL C6H8O6), copper (10 µM CuSO4), iron (10 µM FeSO4), zinc (10 µM ZnCl2), arsenite (2 µM NaAsO2), nickel (200 µM NiCl2), and sulforaphane (5 µM C6H11NOS2). Essential metals were applied at equivalent concentrations to cadmium. Arsenite and nickel were both used at their highest noncytotoxic concentrations based on initial titration experiments (not shown).
Figure 3. Specificity of metallothionein (MT) transcription induction by cadmium. MT gene expression was assessed by RT-PCR in NHU cells exposed to a variety of candidate inducers. The total cDNA input was 1 µg and PCR reaction products were removed after 25 cycles; GAPDH was included as input control. Note that medium was changed at time T = 0 only and there was no renewal of treatments over the period. Additional PCR controls included genomic DNA as a positive control and a no-template (H2O) negative control; RT negative samples confirmed absence of genomic contamination. In (A), nondifferentiated NHU cell cultures were treated with a range of concentrations of sulforaphane (C6H11NOS2) for 12 h, and the effect on transcription of the ROS-sensitive gene HMOX1 assessed in comparison to exposure to 10 µM CdCl2 (n = 1 independent cell line). The concentration of C6H11NOS2 that induced transcription of HMOX1 to a comparable extent to cadmium was selected. In (B), nondifferentiated NHU cell cultures were treated with a range of concentrations of ascorbic acid (C6H8O6) for 12 h in combination with 10 µM CdCl2 and the effect on HMOX1 transcription assessed. The concentration of C6H8O6 that caused the biggest decrease in HMOX1 transcription was selected. In (C), NHU cell cultures (n = 2 independent cell lines) were exposed to a range of candidate regulators and transcript expression was assessed for the MT-1 genes shown above to be most sensitive to cadmium induction (from Figure 2B,C). Candidate inducers tested were cadmium (10 µM CdCl2), cadmium combined with ascorbic acid (10 µM CdCl2 + 25 µg/mL C6H8O6), copper (10 µM CuSO4), iron (10 µM FeSO4), zinc (10 µM ZnCl2), arsenite (2 µM NaAsO2), nickel (200 µM NiCl2), and sulforaphane (5 µM C6H11NOS2). Essential metals were applied at equivalent concentrations to cadmium. Arsenite and nickel were both used at their highest noncytotoxic concentrations based on initial titration experiments (not shown).
Ijms 20 01344 g003
Ijms 20 01344 g004 550
Figure 4. Western blot detection of cadmium-induced MT-1A and MT-1M expression in NHU cells using subtype-specific antibodies. MT-1A and MT-1M protein induction was observed by Western blotting of NHU cells exposed to 10 µM CdCl2 for 72 h. Total protein input was 20 µg per track, with β-actin expression used to verify equal protein loading. Figures show western blots probed with MT-1A and MT-1M isoform-specific antibodies in (A) nondifferentiated and (B) differentiated NHU cell cultures exposed to cadmium for 72 h (representative blots shown from n = 3 independent cell lines). In (B), differentiated barrier formation was confirmed by TEER (see Figure 3B). (C) Western blot showing specificity of MT-1A and MT-1M protein induction (representative of n = 2 independent cell lines tested). Proliferating NHU cells were exposed to a range of potential inducers for 72 h and protein expression assessed. The candidate inducers tested were cadmium (10 µM CdCl2), copper (10 µM CuSO4), iron (10 µM FeSO4), zinc (10 µM ZnCl2), arsenite (2 µM NaAsO2), nickel (200 µM NiCl2), and sulforaphane (5 µM C6H11NOS2). MT-1A protein expression is reported as fold-change relative to unexposed control cells.
Figure 4. Western blot detection of cadmium-induced MT-1A and MT-1M expression in NHU cells using subtype-specific antibodies. MT-1A and MT-1M protein induction was observed by Western blotting of NHU cells exposed to 10 µM CdCl2 for 72 h. Total protein input was 20 µg per track, with β-actin expression used to verify equal protein loading. Figures show western blots probed with MT-1A and MT-1M isoform-specific antibodies in (A) nondifferentiated and (B) differentiated NHU cell cultures exposed to cadmium for 72 h (representative blots shown from n = 3 independent cell lines). In (B), differentiated barrier formation was confirmed by TEER (see Figure 3B). (C) Western blot showing specificity of MT-1A and MT-1M protein induction (representative of n = 2 independent cell lines tested). Proliferating NHU cells were exposed to a range of potential inducers for 72 h and protein expression assessed. The candidate inducers tested were cadmium (10 µM CdCl2), copper (10 µM CuSO4), iron (10 µM FeSO4), zinc (10 µM ZnCl2), arsenite (2 µM NaAsO2), nickel (200 µM NiCl2), and sulforaphane (5 µM C6H11NOS2). MT-1A protein expression is reported as fold-change relative to unexposed control cells.
Ijms 20 01344 g004
Ijms 20 01344 g005 550
Figure 5. Cadmium induction of zinc transporter-1 (SLC30A1) gene transcription. SLC30A1 gene transcript expression was assessed by RT-PCR, with PCR reaction products removed after 25 cycles. PCR controls included genomic DNA as a positive control and a no-template (H2O) negative control. Total cDNA input was 1 µg with GAPDH used as an input loading control; RT-ve samples confirmed the absence of genomic contamination. For differentiated NHU cells, differentiation was confirmed by assessment of TEER as >1000 Ω.cm2 (see supplementary materials, Table S1). (A) NHU cells in nondifferentiated and differentiated states were maintained in control medium or with 10 µM CdCl2 for up to 72 h. Note that medium was changed at time T = 0 and there was no renewal of the cadmium over the period. The figure shows representative results from n = 3 (nondifferentiated) and n = 1 (differentiated) independent NHU cell lines. (B) RT-PCR of NHU cells in a nondifferentiated state maintained in standard medium (control) or with 10 µM CdCl2 for up to 24 h prior to the experiment (‘pre-exposure’), whereupon cadmium was removed from the medium (time point 0) and culture continued for a further 48 h. (C) RT-PCR of NHU cells in a differentiated state maintained in standard medium (control) or with 10 µM CdCl2 for up to 3 days prior to the experiment (‘pre-exposure’), whereupon cadmium was removed from the medium (time point 0) and culture continued for up to 11 days.
Figure 5. Cadmium induction of zinc transporter-1 (SLC30A1) gene transcription. SLC30A1 gene transcript expression was assessed by RT-PCR, with PCR reaction products removed after 25 cycles. PCR controls included genomic DNA as a positive control and a no-template (H2O) negative control. Total cDNA input was 1 µg with GAPDH used as an input loading control; RT-ve samples confirmed the absence of genomic contamination. For differentiated NHU cells, differentiation was confirmed by assessment of TEER as >1000 Ω.cm2 (see supplementary materials, Table S1). (A) NHU cells in nondifferentiated and differentiated states were maintained in control medium or with 10 µM CdCl2 for up to 72 h. Note that medium was changed at time T = 0 and there was no renewal of the cadmium over the period. The figure shows representative results from n = 3 (nondifferentiated) and n = 1 (differentiated) independent NHU cell lines. (B) RT-PCR of NHU cells in a nondifferentiated state maintained in standard medium (control) or with 10 µM CdCl2 for up to 24 h prior to the experiment (‘pre-exposure’), whereupon cadmium was removed from the medium (time point 0) and culture continued for a further 48 h. (C) RT-PCR of NHU cells in a differentiated state maintained in standard medium (control) or with 10 µM CdCl2 for up to 3 days prior to the experiment (‘pre-exposure’), whereupon cadmium was removed from the medium (time point 0) and culture continued for up to 11 days.
Ijms 20 01344 g005
Table
Table 1. Details of primers used for experiments.
Table 1. Details of primers used for experiments.
Target GeneForward or ReverseSequence (5′–3′)Product Size (bp)
GAPDHForwardCAAGGTCATCCATGACAACTTTG90
GAPDHReverseGGGCCATCCACAGTCTTCTG90
HMOX1ForwardCCAGCAACAAAGTGCAAGATTC102
HMOX1ReverseGTGTAAGGACCCATCGGAGAAG102
MT-1AForwardCTCGAAATGGACCCCAACT219
MT-1AReverseATATCTTCGAGCAGGGCTGTC219
MT-1BForwardGGAACTCCAGGCTTGTCTTGG77
MT-1BReverseTTGCAGGAGGTACATTTG77
MT-1EForwardTGCGCCGGCTCCTGCAAGTC118
MT-1EReverseATGCCCCTTTGCAGACGCAGC118
MT-1FForwardCCTGCACCTGCGCTGGTTCC110
MT-1FReverseACAGCCCTGGGCACACTTGC110
MT-1GForwardCTTCTCGCTTGGGAACTCTA309
MT-1GReverseAGGGGTCAAGATTGTAGCAAA309
MT-1HForwardCCTCTTCTCTTCTCGCTTGG317
MT-1HReverseGCAAATGAGTCGGAGTTGTAG317
MT-1MForwardCTAGCAGTCGCTCCATTTATCG180
MT-1MReverseCAGCTGCAGTTCTCCAACGT180
MT-1XForwardGGACCCAACTGCTCCTGCTC151
MT-1XReverseTTTGCAGATGCAGCCCTGGGC151
MT-2AForwardCCGACTCTAGCCGCCTCTT259
MT-2AReverseGTGGAAGTCGCGTTCTTTACA259
MT-3ForwardAGTGCGAGGGATGCAAATG98
MT-3ReverseGCCTTTGCACACACAGTCCTT98
SLC30A1ForwardGCATCAGTTTATGAGGCTGGTCCT352
SLC30A1ReverseCAGGCTGAATGGTAGTAGCGTGAA352
Table
Table 2. Details of primary antibodies used for experiments.
Table 2. Details of primary antibodies used for experiments.
AntigenCloneHostSupplierDilutionMolecular Weight (kDa)
Beta-actinA5441MouseSigma Aldrich1:10 000 (WB)42
MT-1AB01PMouseAbnova1:750 (WB)6
MT-1M17281-APRabbitProteinTech1 µg/mL (WB)6
Table
Table 3. Details of secondary antibodies used for experiments.
Table 3. Details of secondary antibodies used for experiments.
AntigenConjugateHostSupplierApplication
Anti-mouse IgGAlexa 680GoatLife TechnologiesWB
Anti-rabbit IgGAlexa 800GoatLife TechnologiesWB

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McNeill, R.V.; Mason, A.S.; Hodson, M.E.; Catto, J.W.F.; Southgate, J. Specificity of the Metallothionein-1 Response by Cadmium-Exposed Normal Human Urothelial Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061344

AMA Style

McNeill RV, Mason AS, Hodson ME, Catto JWF, Southgate J. Specificity of the Metallothionein-1 Response by Cadmium-Exposed Normal Human Urothelial Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(6):1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061344

Chicago/Turabian Style

McNeill, Rhiannon V., Andrew S. Mason, Mark E. Hodson, James W.F. Catto, and Jennifer Southgate. 2019. "Specificity of the Metallothionein-1 Response by Cadmium-Exposed Normal Human Urothelial Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 6: 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061344

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop