Next Article in Journal
Molecular and Hormonal Aspects of Drought-Triggered Flower Shedding in Yellow Lupine
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Common Molecular Basis in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Map-Based Cloning, Phylogenetic, and Microsynteny Analyses of ZmMs20 Gene Regulating Male Fertility in Maize
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 15
10.3390/ijms20153729
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seed Treatment with Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 Promotes Wheat Seedling Growth under NaCl Stress Through Activating the Enzymatic and Nonenzymatic Antioxidant Defense Systems

by
Shuwu Zhang
1,
Bingliang Xu
1,* and
Yantai Gan
2
1
College of Plant protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Biocontrol Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Government of Canada Swift Current Research & Development Centre, Swift Current, SK S9H 3X2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(15), 3729; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153729
Submission received: 15 June 2019 / Revised: 23 July 2019 / Accepted: 25 July 2019 / Published: 30 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Seed Development, Dormancy and Germination)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Salt stress is one of the major abiotic stresses limiting crop growth and productivity worldwide. Species of Trichoderma are widely recognized for their bio-control abilities, but little information is regarding to the ability and mechanisms of their promoting plant growth and enhancing plant tolerance to different levels of salt stress. Hence, we determined (i) the role of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 (TL-6) in promoting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed germination and seedling growth under different levels of salt stress, and (ii) the mechanisms responsible for the enhanced tolerance of wheat to salt stress by TL-6. Wheat seeds treated with or without TL-6 were grown under different levels of salt stress in controlled environmental conditions. As such, the TL-6 treatments promoted seed germination and increased the shoot and root weights of wheat seedlings under both non-stress and salt-stress conditions. Wheat seedlings with TL-6 treatments under different levels of NaCl stress increased proline content by an average of 11%, ascorbate 15%, and glutathione 28%; and decreased the contents of malondialdehyde (MDA) by an average of 19% and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) 13%. The TL-6 treatments induced the transcriptional level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging enzymes, leading to the increases of glutathione s-transferase (GST) by an average of 17%, glutathione peroxidase (GPX) 16%, ascorbate peroxidase (APX) 17%, glutathione reductase (GR) 18%, dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) 5%. Our results indicate that the beneficial strain of TL-6 effectively scavenged ROS under NaCl stress through modulating the activity of ROS scavenging enzymes, regulating the transcriptional levels of ROS scavenging enzyme gene expression, and enhancing the nonenzymatic antioxidants in wheat seedling in response to salt stress. Our present study provides a new insight into the mechanisms of TL-6 can activate the enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant defense systems and enhance wheat seedling tolerance to different levels of salt stress at physiological, biochemical and molecular levels.

1. Introduction

Salinity stress is one of the serious abiotic stresses and global environmental problems that adversely affecting and limiting the plant growth and yield, agricultural production and environmental health worldwide [1,2]. At present time, more than 800 million hectares of soil resources worldwide have been severely damaged by soil salinity, representing 7% of the total lands surface [3,4]. As a consequence, it is predicted that more than 20% of global agricultural production was affected [5] by salinity worldwide. In order to alleviate the adverse effects caused by salt stress, many researchers have tried to breed and develop salt-tolerant plant cultivars to alleviate this situation. However, little success has been achieved in developing more efficient salt-tolerant plants [6], and also further studies are required to better understand the mechanisms’ response for the plants’ tolerance to salt stress. It is therefore worthwhile to explore the question of how to mitigate the adverse effects of salt stress, and enhance plant tolerance to salt stress, and eventually increase the plant yields.
A new and innovative strategy that has attracted an increasing attention in recent years, is to use the remarkable beneficial bacteria and fungi to induce plant resistance to abiotic stress. This approach will open a new avenue for capitalizing on the cultivable microbiome to strengthen plant tolerance to salt stress, and thus to refine agricultural practices and production under saline conditions [7]. Trichoderma spp. are one of the free-living fungi that are well recognized as bio-control agents of soil-borne plant pathogens commonly in soil and root ecosystems [8]. As such, many researchers have been widely studied for their capacity to produce antibiotics, parasitize other fungi and nematodes, and compete with deleterious plant microorganisms [9]. In addition, some Trichoderma strains were revealed that they can interact directly with roots, increase plant growth and tolerance to different abiotic stresses [10]; plants roots colonized by T. harzianum results in increased level of plant enzymes that helped enhance plant resistance to abiotic stresses, including various peroxidases, chitinases, β-1, 3-glucanases, lipoxygenase-pathway hydro peroxide lyase and compounds like phytoalexins and phenols [11,12,13]; Arabidopsis and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) roots exposed to salt stress and inoculated with Trichoderma spp. revealed an increased expression of genes related to salt-tolerance [14]. Although there are numerous reports on the abilities of how Trichoderma spp. alleviate the adverse effects of abiotic stresses or enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stresses, the specific knowledge for the mechanisms of Trichoderma spp. in alleviating or enhancing plant tolerance to salt stress is a very complex phenomenon and the nature remains unresolved [15].
Our previous studies revealed that T. longibrachiatum has a higher potential in promoting plants growth under abiotic (150 mM salt stress) and biotic (nematodes infection) stresses [16,17]. However, the previous studies failed to determine the potential of T. longibrachiatum T6 (TL-6) in promoting plant growth and enhancing plant tolerance to salt stress under different levels, as well as the possible physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms of TL-6 enhancing the tolerance of wheat to different levels of salt stress. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to (i) investigate the role of TL-6 in promoting wheat seed germination and seedling growth under different levels of salt solutions, and (ii) the possible mechanisms responsible for the enhanced tolerance of wheat to salt stress through limiting the reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage by TL-6.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of TL-6 on Wheat Seed Germination and Seedling Growth in Vitro

Compared with wheat seeds that were soaked with sterile water, the seeds treated with the strain of TL-6 increased the germination rate by an average of 6%, germination potential 8%, and germination index 10%, across the three NaCl treatments (0, 10 and 20 mg mL−1). Without the TL-6 treatment, the germination rate, germination potential and germination index were all decreased significantly with the increase of NaCl concentration (Table 1).
Increased NaCl concentration (from 0, 10 to 20 mg mL−1) significantly decreased the growth of wheat seedlings (Figure 1). At a given NaCl level, the TL-6 strain treatment increased the length of plumule and radicle of wheat seedlings significantly compared with sterile water treatment. The treatment of TL-6 strain increased the length of plumule of wheat seedlings by 9% at the 0 mg mL−1 of NaCl treatment, and furthered to 11% at 10 mg mL−1, and 30% at 20 mg mL−1 (Figure 1A), whereas the TL-6 treatment increased the length of radicle by 10% at 0 mg mL−1, 9% at 10 mg mL−1, and 16% at 20 mg mL−1 (Figure 1B).

2.2. Effect of TL-6 on Wheat Seedling Growth in Greenhouse

Increased concentration of NaCl from 0 to 20 mg mL−1 decreased both shoot height and root length of wheat seedlings significantly regardless under sterile water or TL-6 treatment (Table 2). However, the TL-6 treatment increased the shoot height and root length of wheat seedlings significantly compared with sterile water treatments whether the NaCl concentration was at 0, 10, or 20 mg mL−1. Averaged across the three NaCl concentration treatments, the seedlings treated with the strain of TL-6 increased the shoot height by 9% to 18% and root length by 11% to 16%; similarly, the TL-6 treatment increased the wheat seedling fresh weight by 15% to 23% and dry weight by 17% to 29% (Table 2).

2.3. Lipid Peroxides, H2O2 and Proline Content in Wheat Seedling

The MDA and H2O2 contents in wheat seedlings treated with sterile water were increased significantly with the increase of NaCl concentrations from 0 to 20 mg mL−1. Measured at Day 35, the content of MDA was increased by 36% to 41% and the H2O2 content was increased by 14% to 24% with the NaCl solution increasing from 10 to 20 mg mL−1, compared with 0 mg mL−1 of NaCl concentration under sterile water treatment (Table 3). The seedlings treated with TL-6 strain decreased MDA content by 15% at the NaCl concentration of 0 mg mL−1, furthered to 22% at 10 mg mL−1 and 19% at 20 mg mL−1, whereas the TL-6 treatment decreased H2O2 contents by 10%, 12% and 16%, respectively, compared with sterile water treatment. The magnitude of the decrease of MDA contents in the TL-6 treated seedlings was greater with 10 mg mL−1 of NaCl concentration, while the decrease of H2O2 contents was greater with 20 mg mL−1 of NaCl concentration.
In the sterile water treatment, the proline content in wheat seedlings was 24% greater at 10 mg mL−1 of NaCl concentration and was 25% greater at 20 mg mL−1, compared with 0 mg mL−1 of NaCl concentration (Table 3). Regardless of the salt level, the wheat seedlings treated with TL-6 strain increased the proline content significantly compared with the sterile water treatment. Averaged across the three (0, 10, 20 mg mL−1) NaCl levels, the wheat seedlings treated with TL-6 increased the proline content by 11% compared with sterile water treatment.

2.4. Ascorbate and Glutathione Contents in Wheat Seedling

In the sterile water treatment, the ascorbate content of wheat seedlings was decreased by 22% at the 10 mg mL−1 of NaCl concentration and by 37% at the 20 mg mL−1 of NaCl stress, compared with 0 mg mL−1 of NaCl (Table 4). At each of the three NaCl levels, the wheat seedlings treated with TL-6 significantly increased the ascorbate content compared with sterile water treatment; the ascorbate content was increased by 6% (0 mg mL−1), 15% (10 mg mL−1) and 23% (20 mg mL−1), respectively. Similarly, a significant increase in glutathione content was detected in NaCl-stressed wheat seedlings treated with TL-6; especially the glutathione content of the TL-6 treated wheat seedlings was increased by 35% at the 10 mg mL−1 of NaCl stress compared with the seedlings in the sterile water treatment.

2.5. ROS Scavenging Enzymes Assay

In the sterile water treatment, the activity of GST, GPX and APX in wheat seedlings were increased after stressed with 10 and 20 mg mL−1 of NaCl solutions compared to the 0 mg mL−1 of NaCl-stressed plants (Figure 2), where GST activity was increased by 24% (10 mg mL−1) and 38% (20 mg mL−1) (Figure 2A), GPX activity was increased by 16% (10 mg mL−1) and 17% (20 mg mL−1) (Figure 2B), and APX activity was increased by 16% (10 mg mL−1) and 28% (20 mg mL−1) (Figure 2C), respectively. The activity of GST, GPX and APX were further increased in wheat seedlings after TL-6 was added to the NaCl treatment compared with sterile water treatment. At each NaCl level, wheat seedlings treated with TL-6 strain increased GST activity by 12%, 20% and 18%, respectively, at the NaCl concentration of 0, 10, and 20 mg mL−1 (Figure 2A); GPX activity was increased by 14%, 15% and 18%, respectively (Figure 2B); APX activity was increased by 18%, 19% and 13%, respectively (Figure 2C).
In contrast to the effect on the GST, GPX and APX, the activities of GR and DHAR in wheat seedlings were decreased with 10 and 20 mg mL−1 of NaCl solutions compared to the 0 mg mL−1 NaCl stress plants in sterile water treatment (Figure 2). The activity of GR was decreased by 10% (10 mg mL−1) and 14% (20 mg mL−1) (Figure 2D), and the activity of DHAR were decreased by 4% (10 mg mL−1) and 10% (20 mg mL−1) (Figure 2E), respectively, compared to the 0 mg mL−1 NaCl-stressed plants. However, compared with sterile water treatment, wheat seedlings treated with TL-6 strain increased the activity of GR by 17% (0 mg mL−1), 18% (10 mg mL−1) and 19% (20 mg mL−1) (Figure 2D), whereas the TL-6 treatment increased the activity of DHAR by 7%, 5% and 2% (Figure 2E), respectively.

2.6. ROS Scavenging Enzyme Gene Expression

In the sterile water treatment, NaCl stress (10 and 20 mg mL−1) induced higher transcript levels of the GST (Figure 3A), GPX (Figure 3B) and APX (Figure 3C) gene expression compared to the 0 mg mL−1 NaCl-stressed plants. At each of the three NaCl levels (0, 10, 20 mg mL−1), the application of TL-6 strain led to the upregulated expression of GST (Figure 3A), GPX (Figure 3B) and APX (Figure 3C) genes compared with sterile water treatment. However, compared to 0 mg mL−1 NaCl-stressed plants in sterile water treatment, NaCl stress (10 and 20 mg mL−1) induced the lower transcript levels of the GR (Figure 3D) and DHAR (Figure 3E) gene expression in sterile water treatment, but the transcript levels of the GR (Figure 3D) and DHAR (Figure 3E) gene expressions were upregulated significantly in seedlings treated with TL-6 under each of the three NaCl levels.

3. Discussion and Conclusions

Salt stress is an important abiotic factor limiting crop productivity as it reduces plant seeds germination, plant vigor and plant productivity, and affects different physiological and biochemical characteristics and mechanisms related to plant growth and development [18]. Trichoderma spp. are common and free-living fungi that are well researched for their growth promoting and biocontrol properties [19]. Although considerable amount of work has been published regarding the biocontrol properties of Trichoderma, not much attention has been paid in investigating the growth promoting and salt tolerance characteristics and mechanisms of Trichoderma spp. promoting wheat growth and enhancing plant tolerance to different levels of NaCl stress. Among several strategies applied to improve plant growth or tolerance to salt stress, our present study offers a new approach to alleviate salinity stress in wheat through seed treatment with salinity tolerant strain Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 (TL-6). Our present study discovered that the salinity tolerant TL-6 strain effectively scavenged ROS through regulating the transcriptional levels of ROS scavenging enzyme gene expression to modulate the activity of ROS scavenging enzymes, and enhancing the nonenzymatic antioxidants in wheat seedling to activate the defense systems in wheat under different levels of salt stress. Our results will provide a vital theoretical basis and new insight for a more efficient application of TL-6 to activate the defense systems in wheat to adapt to saline conditions.
In vitro and greenhouse experiments, different levels of NaCl stress decreased wheat seed germination and seedling growth significantly; this was expected. Several previous studies have demonstrated that NaCl stress is one of the most serious abiotic stresses affecting plant seeds germination, growth and biomass yield in many cereal and vegetable crops [20,21,22]. However, the supplementation of TL-6 alleviated the negative effects significantly in the present study. Similarly, the application of Trichoderma increased the biomass production of Arabidopsis [23], and the application of T. harzianum T22 enhanced tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L.) seed germination under abiotic stresses [18].
In addition, studies have shown that salt stress can increase the production of ROS in plant cell that leads to plant membrane dysfunction and cell death [24]. To detoxify ROS, the plant can activate the antioxidant defense systems through inducing both enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants. The enzymatic antioxidants mainly include superoxide dismutase, catalase, GPX, GST, and the enzymes of APX, DHAR, and GR. The latter three are the key enzymes involving in ascorbate–glutathione cycle and scavenging ROS [25]. The nonenzymatic antioxidants also play a role in scavenging ROS, including MDA, H2O2, proline, ascorbate and glutathione [25,26]. Trichoderma species can activate the antioxidant defense system to recycle the oxidized ascorbate and thus to enhance the plant tolerance to abiotic stresses in many plant species, such as Arabidopsis, tomato and cucumber [12,27]. In the present study, the presence of TL-6 strain significantly improved the activities of antioxidant enzymes, leading to the enhanced tolerance of wheat seedlings to salt stress.
The present study also showed that Trichoderma species played a critical role in host plant metabolic processes in response to NaCl stress. The use of TL-6 strain increased proline content in wheat seedlings under NaCl stress, which helped maintain the cell osmo regulation [21] and energy storage [28]. Increased proline content enhanced the ability of plants to detoxify the accumulated ROS and protect the seedlings from oxidative damage [24,29]. In Arabidopsis, the treatment with the combination of salt and Trichoderma spp. increased proline content as compared to the treatment with salt alone [2]. Additionally, we found a decrease of MDA and H2O2 contents in wheat seedlings treated with TL-6 under salt stress. Similarly, the plants treated with beneficial arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) have been reported to decrease the content of MDA in tomato [30], mulberry (Morus alba L.) [22] and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) [31] while grown under salt stress. Rawat et al. (2013) [32] found that the content of H2O2 in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) was decreased with the inoculation of T. harzianum, compared with control plants. Furthermore, according to the published literature, application of exogenous salicylic acid significantly increased the contents of ascorbate and glutathione in wheat seedlings under salt stress [33], which in accordance with the results from our present study, the contents of ascorbate and glutathione were significantly increased after application of TL-6 under both saline and non-saline soil conditions. Meanwhile, our study found that with the increase level of salt stress, the content of ascorbate was significantly decreased, whereas the content of glutathione was significantly increased, which is in agreement with the previous reports [34,35].
Application of salicylic acid increased the transcripts of the genes encoding ascorbate and glutathione cycle enzymes [36,37], and the overexpression of these genes conferred an enhanced tolerance to salt or chilling stress [38,39]. In our study, the transcripts of the genes encoding ROS scavenging enzymes were increased significantly in wheat seedlings treated with the TL-6 strain under salinity and non-saline conditions. The degree of the expression of ROS scavenging enzyme genes was in coincidence with the corresponding activity of the ROS scavenging enzymes. Our results also indicate that the strain of TL-6 is able to regulate the transcriptional level of ROS scavenging enzyme genes effectively so as to enhance the enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant defense systems in response to salt stress.
Our present study offers a new approach to alleviate salinity stress in wheat through seed treatment with the salinity tolerant strain of TL-6. The beneficial role of TL-6 was reflected by stimulating seed germination, promoting seedling growth, and enhancing plant tolerance to saline stress. One novel possible mechanism is related to the enhanced roles of ROS scavenging enzymes and nonenzymatic antioxidants as signal to alleviate the negative effect of salt stress and activate the antioxidant defense systems in wheat seedlings response to salt stress. The present study is important for developing strategies that exploit these beneficial effects of the TL-6 on improving plant tolerance to abiotic stresses.
Furthermore, several lines of study have shown that nitric oxide (NO) and ROS were putatively involved in a myriad of physiological events related to plant growth under salt, drought and other stress conditions [40,41,42]. Also, some previous studies revealed that ROS and NO play significant role in regulating of numerous physiological and pathological cell processes in mammals including regulation of immune responses, oncogenesis and neurodegeneration, as well as the relationship between ROS and NO under oxidative stress conditions [43,44]. However, the production of NO in wheat response to salt tress, and the effect of NO on the ROS accumulation in wheat after the application of TL-6 under salt stress that need to be addressed in the future studies.

4. Materials and Methods

Experiments were carried out at the Laboratory of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, and Gansu Provincial Biocontrol Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests. All treatments in the experiments described below had six replicates and each experiment was repeated twice over time, unless otherwise indicated.

4.1. Fungal Material

Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 (TL-6) was isolated from a rhizisphere saline-soil of a forest site nearby Tianshui, Gansu. The strain of TL-6 has since been collected at the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center, in Beijing, with the patent number (CGMCC No.13183). The spore concentration of TL-6 was prepared according to the procedure described by Zhang et al. (2014) [45], with some modifications. The spore concentration in the suspension was determined with a hemacytometer, and the concentration was prepared and adjusted to 1 × 108 spores mL−1.

4.2. Seeds Treatment

The wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar ‘Yongliang 4’ provided by Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Lanzhou, China) was used in all the experiments. The cultivar has been well adapted at the major wheat growing areas of northwest China. Wheat seeds with a uniform size were surface-sterilized with 1% (v/v) NaOCl for 5 min and then with 95% (v/v) ethanol for 5 additional minutes. After disinfection, all the seeds were rinsed with sterile water, and then were soaked in TL-6 spore suspension at the concentration of 1 × 108 spores mL−1 for 12 h. The control seeds were soaked in sterile water for 12 h.

4.3. Effect of TL-6 on Wheat Seed Germination under NaCl Stress

Wheat seeds (50 seeds) treated with the spore suspension of TL-6 or sterile water were germinated in 9-cm diameter Petri dishes that contained 10 mL of NaCl solutions, and the dishes were covered with a layer of absorbent cotton and blotter papers. The germination was tested at the NaCl concentrations of 0, 10 and 20 mg mL−1. Petri dishes were incubated at 25 ± 1 °C with supplemental day/night lighting of 16/8 h. Seed germination was recorded at 24 h intervals for a further period of 5 days. Seed germination potential was determined at Day 3 after incubation, whereas seed germination rates and germination index were determined at Day 5. The average length of plumule and radicle were determined at Day 7.
Seeds germination rate (SGR), germination potential (GP) and germination index (GI) were calculated according to the formula described by Niu et al. (2013) [46].
SGR (%) = (NSG/TNS) × 100
where NSG is number of seeds germinated after 5 days of incubation, and TNS is total number of seeds in each Petri dish.
GP (%) = (NSG/TNS) × 100
where NSG is number of seeds germinated after 3 days of incubation, and TNS is total number of seeds in each Petri dish.
GI (%) = ∑NGSi/Ti × 100
where NGSi is number of germinated seeds in a given time, and Ti is the incubation time (day).

4.4. Effect of TL-6 on Wheat Seedling Growth under NaCl Stress in Greenhouse

Experiments were carried out in a greenhouse with constant temperature of 25°C±0.5, supplemental day/night lighting of 16/8 h, and relative humidity of 65%. Wheat seeds (80 seeds) with a uniform size were planted in 10-cm diameter pots that contained 300 g of sterilized soil. A total of 50 seedlings per pot were kept through thinning at Day 12 after emergence. The experiments included two group treatments: (i) wheat seeds were soaked with the spore suspension of TL-6 and inoculated at 0, 10 and 20 mg mL−1 of NaCl concentrations, and (ii) wheat seeds were soaked with sterile water and inoculated at 0, 10 and 20 mg mL−1 of NaCl concentrations. Each of the NaCl-treated pots was irrigated with 25 mL of NaCl solution whereas the 0 mg mL−1 of NaCl concentration treatment was irrigated with 25 mL of sterile water. Plants were grown in a greenhouse (25°C) with supplemental day/night lighting of 16/8 h. The experiment was arranged using a completely randomized design, and each pot was irrigated with 200 mL of sterile distilled water at regular intervals. The seedling height, root length, shoot and root fresh and dry weight, and the biochemical, physiological and molecular parameters were determined at Day 35.

4.5. Lipid Peroxides and Proline Contents Determination

Lipid peroxides content in plants is commonly considered as an indicator of oxidative damage caused by abiotic stress. At the present study, the accumulation of MDA in wheat seedlings treated with TL-6 strain or sterile water under the different concentrations of NaCl solutions (0, 10, and 20 mg mL−1) was measured using the method of Demiral and Turkan (2005) [47] and Tian et al. (2015) [48], with minor modifications. For the determination of the accumulation of MDA in wheat seedlings, 0.5 g of leave samples were grounded in 2.5 mL of 0.1% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and the homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000× g. An aliquot of 1 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 4 mL of 20% TCA containing 0.5% thiobarbituric acid at 90°C for 30 min, and then cooled quickly on an ice bath. Afterwards, the reaction mixture was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 15 min and the absorbance of supernatant was recorded at 532 nm wavelength. Measurements were corrected for unspecific turbidity by subtracting the absorbance at 600 nm. The content of MDA was expressed as µmol g−1 FW.
The content of proline in wheat seedlings was determined by following the procedure described by Bates et al. (1973) [49]. In brief, 0.5 g of wheat leaves were homogenized in 10 mL of 3% aqueous sulphosalicylic acid, and the homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min, and then filtered through Whatman Paper No.3 filter for three times. After that, 1 mL of supernatant was mixed with 1 mL of glacial acetic acid and acid ninhydrin at 100°C for 1 ho and then the reaction was quickly stopped in an ice-bath. Afterwards, the reaction mixture was extracted with 2 mL of toluene, and mixed with a tube stirrer for 30 s. The chromophore containing toluene was aspirated from the aqueous phase at room temperature, and the absorbance was measured at 520 nm wavelength on spectrophotometer and the toluene was used as blank.
The proline concentration (µmol per g of FW material) was determined from a standard curve and calculated by following the method of Bates et al. (1973) [49], as follow:
Proline concentration = [(µg proline per mL × mL toluene)/115.5 µg per µmol]/[(g sample)/5]

4.6. H2O2 Assay in Wheat Seedling

The content of H2O2 in wheat seedlings was determined following the method of Jena and Choudhuri (1981) [50] with some modifications. Seedling leaves of 0.5 g were homogenized with 3 mL of K-phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.5). The extraction was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min at 4°C, and then 1 mL of 0.1% titanium tetrachloride with 20% sulfuric acid (v/v) was added to 3 mL of extraction supernatant. The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min, and the content of H2O2 was calculated by measuring the absorption of supernatant at 410 nm wavelength, and expressed as µmol g−1 of FW.

4.7. Determination of Ascorbate and Glutathione

The crude extraction for the determination of ascorbate and glutathione contents in wheat seedlings was extracted by following the procedure of Foyer et al. (1983) [51], Hasanuzzaman and Fujita (2011) [35], with some modifications. The frozen wheat seedling leaves of 1.0 g were homogenized in 3 mL of 5% ice-cold metaphosphoric acid buffer (pH 7.0) that contained 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The crude extraction was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min, and the supernatant was used for the determination of ascorbate and glutathione contents.
Ascorbate content was determined following the method of Huang et al. (2005) [34] with some modifications. The supernatant of crude extraction (1 ml) was neutralized with 0.5 M K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at room temperature. The ascorbate content was assayed spectrophotometrically at 265 nm in 100 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) with 0.5 unit of ascorbate oxidase. A specific standard curve with ascorbate was used for quantification and calculation the content of ascorbate.
An aliquot of supernatant (1 ml) was neutralized with 0.5 M K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at room temperature. Reduced glutathione is oxidized by 5, 5′-dithio-bis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) and reduced by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 2′-phosphate reduced tetrasodium salt hydrate (NADPH) in the presence of GR. The reaction mixture was used for the determination of the content of glutathione and evaluated by the rate of absorption changes at 412 nm of 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoic acid generated from the reduction of 5, 5′-dithio-bis (2-nitrobenzoic acid). A specific standard curve with known concentrations of reduced glutathione and oxidised glutathione were used for quantification. The content of glutathione was calculated by subtracting oxidised glutathione from total reduced glutathione [52].

4.8. ROS Scavenging Enzymes Extraction and Determination

Wheat seedling leaves of 1.0 g were homogenized in 5 mL of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) that contained 5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 10 mM magnesium chloride, 5 mM magnesium acetate, 1.5% Polyvinylpyrrolidone, 1 mM Phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride and 1 μg mL−1 aprotinin. The sample filtration was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected for the determination of the activity of ROS scavenging enzymes.
APX activity was determined according to the method as described by Nakano and Asada (1981) [53], and expressed as U mg−1 FW of protein. The enzyme extract solution in a final volume of 1 mL that contained 50 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.5 mM ascorbate, 0.1 mM H2O2 and 0.1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The activity was measured by observing the decrease of reaction mixtures in absorbance at 290 nm.
GST activity was assessed following the procedure of Hasanuzzaman and Fujita (2013) [52] with some modifications. A final volume of 1 mL enzyme solution that contained 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 6.5), 1 mM 1-chloro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene and 1.5 mM reduced glutathione. The increase in absorbance was measured at 340 nm, and GST activity was expressed as nmol mg−1 protein min−1.
GPX activity was measured spectrophotometrically with the method of He et al. (2006) [54] and Elia et al. (2003) [55] using H2O2 as a substrate. The enzyme solution (1 ml) that consisted of 50 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.12 mM NADPH, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 2 mM reduced glutathione, 1 mM NaN3, 1 unit GR and 0.6 mM H2O2. The absorbance of reaction mixture was assayed at 340 nm wavelength and GPX activity was expressed as 0.1 nmol oxidized NADPH mg−1 protein min−1.
DHAR activity was determined according to Nakano and Asada (1981) [53] by assaying the decrease in absorbance of dehydroascorbate at 265 nm. The enzyme solution (1 ml) that contained 50 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.1 mM dehydroascorbate, and 2.5 mM reduced glutathione. DHAR activity was expressed as nmol mg−1 protein min−1.
GR activity was measured according to the method of Foyer and Halliwell (1976) [56]. The supernatant was contained 1 mL of enzyme solution (1 μmol ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 3.3 mg oxidised glutathione, 0.1 mg NADPH and 87 μmol Tris buffer). Corrections were made for NADPH oxidation in the absence of oxidised glutathione. The absorbance of reaction mixture was assayed at 340 nm wavelength and GR activity was expressed as 0.1 nmol oxidized NADPH mg−1 protein min−1 [57].

4.9. Total RNA Extraction and First Strand cDNA Synthesis

Wheat seedlings of 35 days old (200 mg sample) in all treatments including those treated with TL-6 strain or sterile water under different concentrations of NaCl solutions (0, 10 and 20 mg mL−1) were used to extract the total RNA. The total RNA was conducted by following the manufacturer′s instruction of Tiangen RNA Simple Total RNA Kit (Tiangen Biotechnology, Beijing, China). After that, one microgram of total RNA was reversely transcribed using the SYBR Prime Script RT-PCR kit II (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China) for the first-strand cDNA synthesis with oligo-dT18 primer priming method according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

4.10. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis

The expression level of genes encoding ROS scavenging enzymes was determined in wheat seedlings after treated with TL-6 strain or sterile water under different concentrations of NaCl solutions. qRT-PCR was performed using a SYBR Premix Ex Taq kit (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer′s instruction. The sequences of the forward and reverse primer pairs (GPX, GST, APX, DHAR, GR and Actin genes) used for qRT-PCR analysis were designed according to the EST (Expressed sequence tag) sequences of wheat in NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) [33,58] using Primer Express 5.0 software that amplifies the target genes (Table 5). The actin gene of wheat was used as an internal control. The relative expression of GPX, GST, APX, DHAR and GR genes was determined using the method of 2−ΔΔCt [59].

4.11. Statistical Analysis

The data were tested in each experiment included TL-6 or sterile water treatments at the different concentrations of salt stress. Each experiment had six replications and was repeated twice over time, but there were no significant interactions between the two runs and treatments, and thus the results obtained from the two runs of experiments are presented as average (mean) with the standard error. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA in SPSS Version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and mean comparisons were made using Duncan’s new multiple range test and the significance was considered at P< 0.05.

Author Contributions

Experiment design, S.Z. and B.X.; Methodology, S.Z. and B.X.; Data analysis, S.Z. and Y.G.; Writing—original draft preparation, S.Z.; Writing—review and editing, S.Z., Y.G. and B.X; Funding acquisition, S.Z.; Project administration, S.Z.

Funding

This work was supported by Scientific Research Start-up Funds for Openly-recruited Doctors (project 2017RCZX-07); Special Funds for Discipline Construction (project GAU-XKJS-2018-147); National Natural Science Foundation of China (project 31860526); Gansu Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (project 18JR3RA161); Research Program Sponsored by Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University (project GSCS-2017-1); International Scientific and Technological Cooperation of Gansu Province (project 1604WKCA010) and Hall of Gansu Province Farming Herd Biology Technology (project GNSW-2013-19).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mastouri, F.; Björkman, T.; Harman, G.E. Seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates biotic, abiotic, and physiological stresses in germinating seeds and seedlings. Phytopathology 2010, 100, 1213–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Contreras-Cornejo, H.A.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.; Alfaro-Cuevas, R.; López-Bucio, J. Trichoderma spp. improve growth of Arabidopsis seedlings under salt stress through enhanced root development, osmolite production, and Na+ elimination through root exudates. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hariadi, Y.; Marandon, K.; Tian, Y.; Jacobsen, S.E.; Shabala, S. Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants grown at various salinity levels. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cabot, C.; Sibole, J.V.; Barcelo, J.; Poschenreider, C. Lessons from crop plants struggling with salinity. Plant Sci. 2014, 226, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hasegawa, P.M. Sodium (Na+) homeostasis and salt tolerance of plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 92, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Qin, Y.; Druzhinina, I.S.; Pan, X.Y.; Yuan, Z.L. Microbially mediated plant salt tolerance and microbiome-based solutions for saline agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 1245–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Harman, G.E. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Harman, G.E.; Howell, C.R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma species: Opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yedidia, I.; Srivastva, A.K.; Kapulnik, Y.; Chet, I. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on microelement concentrations and increased growth of cucumber plants. Plant Soil 2001, 235, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gamalero, E.; Berta, G.; Massa, N.; Glick, B.R.; Lingua, G. Synergistic interactions between the ACC deaminase-producing bacterium Pseudomonas putida UW4 and the AM fungus Gigaspora rosea positively affect cucumber plant growth. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 64, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shabala, S.; Cuin, T.A. Potassium transport and plant salt tolerance. Physiol. Plant 2008, 133, 651–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. De Palma, M.; D’Agostino, N.; Proietti, S.; Bertini, L.; Lorito, M.; Caruso, C.; Ruocco, M.; Chiusano, M.L.N.; Tucci, M. Suppression subtractive hybridization analysis provides new insights into the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) response to the plant probiotic microorganism Trichoderma longibrachiatum MK1. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 190, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brotman, Y.; Landau, U.; Cuadros-Inostroza, Á.; Tohge, T.; Fernie, A.R.; Chet, I.; Viterbo, A.; Willmitzer, L. Trichoderma-plant root colonization: Escaping early plant defense responses and activation of the antioxidant machinery for saline stress tolerance. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Türkan, I.; Demiral, T. Recent developments in understanding salinity tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 67, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, S.W.; Gan, Y.T.; Xu, B.L. Efficacy of Trichoderma longibrachiatum in the control of Heterodera avenae. BioControl 2014, 59, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, S.W.; Gan, Y.T.; Xu, B.L. Application of plant-growth-promoting fungi Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 enhances tolerance of wheat to salt stress through improvement of antioxidative defense system and gene expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ma, L.J.; Li, Y.Y.; Yu, C.M.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.M.; Li, N.; Chen, Q.; Bu, N. Alleviation of exogenous oligochitosan on wheat seedlings growth under salt stress. Protoplasma 2012, 249, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mishra1, N.; Khan, S.S.; Sundari, S.K. Native isolate of Trichoderma: A biocontrol agent with unique stress tolerance properties. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Azooz, M.M.; Youssef, A.M.; Ahmad, P. Evaluation of salicylic acid (SA) application on growth, osmotic solutes and antioxidant enzyme activities on broad bean seedlings grown under diluted seawater. Int. J. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 3, 253–264. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rasool, S.; Ahmad, A.; Siddiqi, T.O.; Ahmad, P. Changes in growth, lipid peroxidation and some key antioxidant enzymes in chickpea genotypes under salt stress. Acta Physiol. Plant 2013, 35, 1039–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ahmad, P.; Ozturk, M.; Sharma, S.; Gucel, S. Effect of sodium carbonate-induced salinity-alkalinity on some key osmoprotectants, protein profile, antioxidant enzymes, and lipid peroxidation in two mulberry (Morus alba L.) cultivars. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Contreras-Cornejo, H.A.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.; Cortés-Penagos, C.; López-Bucio, J. Trichoderma virens, a plant beneficial fungus, enhances biomass production and promotes lateral root growth through an auxin-dependent mechanism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1579–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ahmad, P.; Jaleel, C.A.; Salem, M.A.; Nabi, G.; Sharma, S. Roles of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2010, 30, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shan, C.; Liang, Z. Jasmonic acid regulates ascorbate and glutathione metabolism in Agropyron cristatum leaves under water stress. Plant Sci. 2010, 178, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Fu, J.; Zheng, J.; Wang, G. Gene families of maize glutathione ascorbate redox cycle respond differently to abiotic stresses. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mastouri, F.; Bjorkman, T.; Harman, G.E. Trichoderma harzianum enhances antioxidant defense of tomato seedlings and resistance to water deficit. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 1264–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aggarwal, A.; Kadian, N.; Neetu, K.; Tanwar, A.; Gupta, K.K. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and alleviation of salinity stress. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2012, 4, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jogaiah, S.; Govind, S.R.; Tran, L.S. Systems biology-based approaches toward understanding drought tolerance in food crops. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2013, 33, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Y. Physiological responses of tomato seedlings (Lycopersicon esculentum) to salt stress. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2009, 3, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saleem, M.; Ashraf, M.; Akram, N.A. Salt (NaCl)-induced modulation in some key physio-biochemical attributes in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2011, 197, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rawat, N.; Himabindu, K.; Neeraja, C.N.; Nair, S.; Bentur, J.S. Suppressive subtraction hybridization reveals that rice gall midge attack elicits plant-pathogen-like responses in rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 63, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, M.F.; Sun, B.G.; Xiao, Z.Z.; Sun, L. First characterization of a teleost Epstein-Barrvirus-induced gene 3 (EBI3) reveals a regulatory effect of EBI3 on the innate immune response of peripheral blood leukocytes. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2013, 41, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huang, C.H.; He, W.L.; Guo, J.K.; Chang, X.X.; Su, P.X.; Zhang, L.X. Increased sensitivity to salt stress in an ascorbate-deficient Arabidopsis mutant. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 3041–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Selenium pretreatment upregulates the antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification system and confers enhanced tolerance to drought stress in rapeseed seedlings. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 143, 1758–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kang, H.M.; Saltveit, M.E. Chilling tolerance of maize, cucumber and rice seedling leaves and roots are differentially affected by salicylic acid. Physiol. Plant 2002, 115, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Chen, S.C.; Liu, Z.M.; Cui, J.X.; Ding, J.G.; Xia, X.J.; Liu, D.L.; Yu, J.Q. Alleviation of chilling-induced oxidative damage by salicylic acid pretreatment and related gene expression in eggplant seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 65, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Duan, M.; Feng, H.L.; Wang, L.Y.; Li, D.; Meng, Q.W. Overexpression of thylakoidal ascorbate peroxidase shows enhanced resistance to chilling stress in tomato. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 867–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sultana, S.; Khew, C.Y.; Morshed, M.M.; Namasivayam, P.; Napis, S.; Ho, C.L. Overexpression of monodehydroascorbate reductase from a mangrove plant (AeMDHAR) confers salt tolerance on rice. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, X.; Hargrove, M.S. Nitric oxide in plants: The roles of ascorbate and hemoglobin. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Domingos, P.; Prado, A.M.; Wong, A.; Gehring, C.; Feijo, J.A. Nitric oxide: A multitasked signaling gas in plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 506–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ahmad, P.; Latef, A.A.; Hashem, A.; Abd Allah, E.; Gucel, S.; Tran, L.S. Nitric oxide mitigates salt stress by regulating levels of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes in chickpea. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Donia, M.; Maksimovic-Ivanic, D.; Mijatovic, S.; Mojic, M.; Miljkovic, D.; Timotijevic, G.; Fagone, P.; Caponnetto, S.; Al-Abed, Y.; McCubrey, J.; et al. In vitro and in vivo anticancer action of Saquinavir-NO, a novel nitric oxide-derivative of the protease inhibitor saquinavir, on hormone resistant prostate cancer cells. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Moloney, J.N.; Cotter, T.G. ROS signalling in the biology of cancer. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 80, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, S.W.; Gan, Y.T.; Xue, Y.Y.; Xu, B.L. The parasitic and lethal effects of Trichoderma longibrachiatum against Heterodera avenae. Biol. Control 2014, 72, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Niu, X.J.; Mi, L.N.; Li, Y.D.; Wei, A.S.; Yang, Z.Q.; Wu, J.D.; Zhang, D.; Song, X.F. Physiological and biochemical responses of rice seeds to phosphine exposure during germination. Chemosphere 2013, 93, 2239–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Demiral, T.; Turkan, I. Comparative lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense systems and proline content in roots of two rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2005, 53, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tian, X.Y.; He, M.R.; Wang, Z.L.; Zhang, J.W.; Song, Y.L.; He, Z.L.; Dong, Y.J. Application of nitric oxide and calcium nitrate enhances tolerance of wheat seedlings to salt stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 77, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bates, L.; Waldren, P.P.; Teare, J.D. Rapid determination of free proline of water stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jena, S.; Choudhuri, M.A. Glycolate metabolism of three submerged aquatic angiosperms during aging. Aquat. Bot. 1981, 12, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Foyer, C.H.; Rowell, J.; Walker, D. Measurements of the ascorbate content of spinach leaf protoplasts during illumination. Planta 1983, 157, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Exogenous sodium nitroprusside alleviates arsenic-induced oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings by enhancing antioxidant defense and glyoxalase system. Ecotoxicology 2013, 22, 584–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach-chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar]
  54. He, Z.Q.; Zou, Z.R.; He, C.X. Effect of AMF on GSH-Px activity and cell membrane osmosis of tomato. J. Northwest Sci. Tech. Univ. Agri. For. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2006, 34, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  55. Elia, A.C.; Galarini, R.; Taticchi, M.I.; Dorr, A.J.M.; Mantilacci, L. Antioxidant responses and bioaccumulation in Ictalurus melas under mercury exposure. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2003, 55, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Foyer, C.H.; Halliwell, B. The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: A proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta 1976, 133, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Adriano, S.; Angelo, C.T.; Bartolomeo, D.; Cristos, X. Influence of water deficit and rewatering on the components of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in four interspecific Prunus hybrids. Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 403–412. [Google Scholar]
  58. Qiu, Z.B.; Guo, J.L.; Zhu, A.J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, M.M. Exogenous jasmonic acid can enhance tolerance of wheat seedlings to salt stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 104, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 03729 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of the strain Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on wheat seedling growth after treated with NaCl solutions, with (A) wheat seed plumule length and (B) radicle length. The line bars represent the standard errors of the means. Different letters denote significant difference at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Figure 1. Effect of the strain Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on wheat seedling growth after treated with NaCl solutions, with (A) wheat seed plumule length and (B) radicle length. The line bars represent the standard errors of the means. Different letters denote significant difference at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Ijms 20 03729 g001
Ijms 20 03729 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on the activity of (A) GST, (B) GPX, (C) APX, (D) GR and (E) DHAR in wheat seedling leaves under salt stress. The line bars represent the standard errors of the means. Different letters denote significant difference at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Figure 2. Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on the activity of (A) GST, (B) GPX, (C) APX, (D) GR and (E) DHAR in wheat seedling leaves under salt stress. The line bars represent the standard errors of the means. Different letters denote significant difference at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Ijms 20 03729 g002
Ijms 20 03729 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on the expression of (A) GST, (B) GPX, (C) APX, (D) GR and (E) DHAR genes in wheat seedling leaves under salt stress. The line bars represent the standard errors of the means. Different letters denote significant difference at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Figure 3. Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on the expression of (A) GST, (B) GPX, (C) APX, (D) GR and (E) DHAR genes in wheat seedling leaves under salt stress. The line bars represent the standard errors of the means. Different letters denote significant difference at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Ijms 20 03729 g003
Table
Table 1. Effect of the strain Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on wheat seed germination at the different NaCl solutions.
Table 1. Effect of the strain Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on wheat seed germination at the different NaCl solutions.
TreatmentSalt Concentrations
(mg mL−1)		 Germination Rate
(%)		Germination Potential
(%)		Germination Index
(%)
Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6096.0 ± 1.2a89.0 ± 1.2a74.2 ± 0.7a
1083.3 ± 1.4b65.0 ± 1.2c52.2 ± 1.2c
2068.3 ± 1.7d51.3 ± 1.4e40.2 ± 0.7e
Sterile water093.3 ± 1.2a82.0 ± 1.2b68.1 ± 1.2b
1078.0 ± 2.3c61.3 ± 0.8d44.9 ± 1.2d
2063.3 ± 1.2e47.0 ± 1.2f38.0 ± 1.7e
Data are means ± standard error of replicates, and the germination rate, potential and index were determined 5, 3 and 5 days after treatment, respectively. Different letters in the same column denote significant differences at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). In the three TL-6 treatments, wheat seeds were presoaked with the suspension of Trichoderma longibrachiatum (TL-6) spores for 12 h, whereas in the three sterile water treatments, wheat seeds were presoaked with sterile water only.
Table
Table 2. Effect of the strain Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on wheat seedling growth at the different NaCl solutions.
Table 2. Effect of the strain Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on wheat seedling growth at the different NaCl solutions.
TreatmentSalt Concentration
(mg mL−1)		Shoot Length
(cm plant−1)		Root Length
(cm plant−1)		Fresh Weight
(g plant−1)		Dry Weight
(g plant−1)
Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6031.24 ± 0.7a24.79 ± 0.6a0.47 ± 0.01a0.14 ± 0.02a
1031.05 ± 0.7a22.55 ± 0.5b0.43 ± 0.01ab0.11 ± 0.01abc
2028.67 ± 0.5b21.58 ± 0.4c0.34 ± 0.02c0.09 ± 0.01bc
Sterile water 028.55 ± 0.6b22.24 ± 0.3b0.41 ± 0.02b0.12 ± 0.01ab
1027.43 ± 0.6bc20.21 ± 0.5c0.35 ± 0.02c0.09 ± 0.02bc
2024.22 ± 0.4c18.65 ± 0.4d0.29 ± 0.02d0.07 ± 0.01c
Data are mean ± standard error of replicates, and the shoot and root length, fresh and dry weights of wheat seedling were determined 35 days after treatment. Different letters in the same column denote significant differences at the P<0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Table
Table 3. Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on MDA, H2O2 and proline contents in wheat seedlings under salt stress.
Table 3. Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on MDA, H2O2 and proline contents in wheat seedlings under salt stress.
TreatmentSalt Concentration
(mg mL−1)		MDA Content
(µmol g−1 FW)		H2O2 Content
(µmol g−1 FW)		Proline Content
(µmol g−1 FW)
Trichoderma longibrachiatum T609.29 ± 0.6d5.84 ± 0.24d12.28 ± 1.2c
1011.46 ± 1.0c6.57 ± 0.26cd15.58 ± 0.9a
2012.35 ± 0.8b6.75 ± 0.27bc15.46 ± 0.7a
Sterile water 010.88 ± 0.9c6.50 ± 0.27cd11.21 ± 1.1d
1014.78 ± 1.0ab7.43 ± 0.27ab13.93 ± 1.0c
2015.33 ± 0.7a8.07 ± 0.12a14.01 ± 0.9b
Data are means ± standard error of replicates and those in a column followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s new multiple range test using two-way ANOVA (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1. FW represents fresh weight.
Table
Table 4. Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on the contents of glutathione and ascorbate in wheat seedling leaves under salt stress.
Table 4. Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on the contents of glutathione and ascorbate in wheat seedling leaves under salt stress.
TreatmentSalt Concentration
(mg mL−1)		Glutathione
(µmol g−1 FW)		Ascorbate
(µmol g−1 FW)
Trichodermalongibrachiatum T600.99 ± 0.05cd0.88 ± 0.02a
101.24 ± 0.04b0.75 ± 0.02b
201.46 ± 0.05a0.64 ± 0.02c
Sterile water 00.85 ± 0.01e0.83 ± 0.01a
100.92 ± 0.04de0.65 ± 0.02c
201.11 ± 0.05c0.52 ± 0.03d
Data are means ± standard error of replicates and those in a column followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s new multiple range test using two-way ANOVA (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Table
Table 5. DNA sequences of qRT-PCR primers for the determination of the ROS scavenging enzyme gene expression in wheat seedlings.
Table 5. DNA sequences of qRT-PCR primers for the determination of the ROS scavenging enzyme gene expression in wheat seedlings.
GenesPremiers Sequence (5′-3′)
APXF: AAAACCACCTACTGCCACCCTATC
R: AGCATTCGCTCCATGACTCAACT
GSTF: AGCTCTTGGCGTCTTGGCT
R: AGGCTTCCCCTTGGAGCAC
GPXF: CCTAACTAACTCCAACTACACC
R: TCCTGCCCACCAAACTGAT
GRF: ATGAATACTCCCGTACATCAGT
R: TTTGTTACATCACCCACAGC
DHARF: AGAAGTTTACGCCCTTCGGC
R: ACAAGTGATGGAGTTGGGT
ActinF: CCGTGGTGATGTTGTGCCAAAGGA
R: CGACGACACTGGTGGAGTTGGAGA
Note: F represents forward, R represents reverse.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, S.; Xu, B.; Gan, Y. Seed Treatment with Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 Promotes Wheat Seedling Growth under NaCl Stress Through Activating the Enzymatic and Nonenzymatic Antioxidant Defense Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153729

AMA Style

Zhang S, Xu B, Gan Y. Seed Treatment with Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 Promotes Wheat Seedling Growth under NaCl Stress Through Activating the Enzymatic and Nonenzymatic Antioxidant Defense Systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(15):3729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153729

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Shuwu, Bingliang Xu, and Yantai Gan. 2019. "Seed Treatment with Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 Promotes Wheat Seedling Growth under NaCl Stress Through Activating the Enzymatic and Nonenzymatic Antioxidant Defense Systems" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 15: 3729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153729

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop