Next Article in Journal
Ameliorative Effects of PACAP against Cartilage Degeneration. Morphological, Immunohistochemical and Biochemical Evidence from in Vivo and in Vitro Models of Rat Osteoarthritis
Next Article in Special Issue
RNA-Seq Transcriptome Analysis of Maize Inbred Carrying Nicosulfuron-Tolerant and Nicosulfuron-Susceptible Alleles
Previous Article in Journal
Accurate Splicing of HDAC6 Pre-mRNA Requires SON
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Drought-Responsive Genes and MicroRNAs in Tobacco
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms16035900
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Positive Selection and Functional Divergence of R2R3-MYB Paralogous Genes Expressed in Inflorescence Buds of Scutellaria Species (Labiatae)

by
Bing-Hong Huang
1,
Erli Pang
2,
Yi-Wen Chen
3,
Huifen Cao
2,
Yu Ruan
4,5 and
Pei-Chun Liao
1,*
1
Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, 88, Ting-Chow Rd., Sec. 4, Taipei 116, Taiwan
2
Laboratory of Computational Molecular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
3
Department of Biological Science and Technology, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, 1, Shuefu Rd., Neipu, Pingtung 912, Taiwan
4
School of Life Science and Engineering, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing 404001, China
5
The College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(3), 5900-5921; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16035900
Submission received: 14 December 2014 / Revised: 15 February 2015 / Accepted: 5 March 2015 / Published: 13 March 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Anthocyanin is the main pigment forming floral diversity. Several transcription factors that regulate the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes belong to the R2R3-MYB family. Here we examined the transcriptomes of inflorescence buds of Scutellaria species (skullcaps), identified the expression R2R3-MYBs, and detected the genetic signatures of positive selection for adaptive divergence across the rapidly evolving skullcaps. In the inflorescence buds, seven R2R3-MYBs were identified. MYB11 and MYB16 were detected to be positively selected. The signature of positive selection on MYB genes indicated that species diversification could be affected by transcriptional regulation, rather than at the translational level. When comparing among the background lineages of Arabidopsis, tomato, rice, and Amborella, heterogeneous evolutionary rates were detected among MYB paralogs, especially between MYB13 and MYB19. Significantly different evolutionary rates were also evidenced by type-I functional divergence between MYB13 and MYB19, and the accelerated evolutionary rates in MYB19, implied the acquisition of novel functions. Another paralogous pair, MYB2/7 and MYB11, revealed significant radical amino acid changes, indicating divergence in the regulation of different anthocyanin-biosynthetic enzymes. Our findings not only showed that Scutellaria R2R3-MYBs are functionally divergent and positively selected, but also indicated the adaptive relevance of regulatory genes in floral diversification.

1. Introduction

Plant diversity is usually characterized by morphological variation [1,2]. Adaptive divergence is one of the most important mechanisms for the high divergence of morphological traits among phylogenetically closely related species [3]. Based on population genomic analyses, both functional genes and regulatory elements have been found to be associated with the variation of adaptive traits [4]. Genes encoding transcription factors (TFs) are evidenced to be relevant to rapid speciation [5,6,7]. In this study, we identified the signatures of positive selection and functional divergence of duplicated TFs in the rapidly divergent herb genus Scutellaria (Labiatae), commonly known as skullcaps.
There are eight Scutellaria species on the continental island of Taiwan, and six are endemic species. All Taiwanese Scutellaria have the same chromosome numbers (2n = 26) [8]. Taiwan Island is rugged in topography, with a land area of approximately 36,000 km2 and located near the southeastern mainland of China. These Taiwanese skullcaps have been suggested to have quickly evolved and recently speciated via recurrent dispersal and geographic isolation events during the Pliocene and Pleistocene [9]. Divergent growth habitats with small population sizes of Taiwanese endemic skullcaps accelerated the fixation rate of alleles under synchronized selective pressure and stochastic drift, as is represented by the fixed haplotypes of chalcone synthase (CHS) and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) in several populations of Scutellaria taiwanensis, Scutellaria tashiroi, Scutellaria playfairii, Scutellaria austrotaiwanensis, and Scutellaria indica in Taiwan [9]. CHS is an upstream regulatory enzyme of anthocyanin biosynthesis that catalyzes the conversion of 4-coumaroyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA to naringenin chalcone and interacts with other anthocyanin biosynthesis enzymes, including chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (FSH), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), etc. [1,10]. The variable expression of these anthocyanin biosynthesis enzymes between species corresponds with the diversity of flower-color types [1], and they are regulated by several R2R3-MYB TFs [11,12].
R2R3-MYBs function in the control and regulation of secondary metabolism in plants [13], and they also play a role in the development of the axillary meristems of inflorescences [14,15], influencing flower morphogenesis [16,17], and color [18,19,20,21,22]. Certain R2R3-MYBs that are expressed in flowers differentially regulate the anthocyanin biosynthetic enzymes and cause flower-color divergence, which has resulted in the incipient speciation between two parapatric ecotypes of Mimulus aurantiacus [19] and between the sympatric, phylogenetically closely related species Phlox drummondii and Phlox cuspidata via differentiating the pollinator preference [23]. Among these speciation cases, divergent selection plays a key role in determining the regulation level of R2R3-MYBs on pigment accumulation. Taiwanese skullcaps vary in growth forms, microtraits (e.g., pollen size and exine), and variegation in flower petals (Table 1). Although the Taiwanese Scutellaria species have only few genetic variations between species, the clear and distinguishable morphological characters support that these species belong to different taxonomic units. Multilocus markers (the microsatellite DNA and amplified fragment length polymorphism loci) also suggest that the Taiwanese Scutellaria species are recently and rapidly divergent species [24]. For exploring the genetic mechanism on the rapid divergence of these island endemic herbs, we reconstructed the transcriptomic library of inflorescence buds of four Taiwanese Scutellaria species, including the widespread species S. indica and three endemic species S. tashiroi, S. playfairii, and S. taiwanensis, to determine putative genes functioning to control flower morphogenesis and color, and thereby permit exploration of the evolutionary genetic mechanisms underlying the rapid speciation of the Scutellaria.
R2R3-MYBs are characterized by the MYB domain, which is responsible for the regulatory specificity of corresponding proteins, and the highly variable C-terminal region, which is less important for the regulatory function [25,26]. A recent study has identified 19 MYBs in Scutellaria baicalensis, of which 11 MYBs contain conserved R2R3 domains and motifs [27]. The gene ontology (GO) annotation suggests that these SbMYBs function in the response to plant hormone and environmental stresses, and regulation of the circadian rhythm, flowering periods, and pigment biosynthesis [27]. Physiological experiments in S. baicalensis and other model species have provided further evidence for their functions in regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis and pigment accumulation, stress tolerance, and meristems and flowers development [12,17,27,28,29,30,31,32,33] (Table 2). In the transcriptomic database of inflorescence buds of the four Taiwanese Scutellaria species S. indica, S. tashiroi, S. playfairii, and S. taiwanensis, we found large amount of reads belongs to the R2R3-MYB transcription factors. This indicates high expression of R2R3-MYBs in inflorescence buds of Scutellaria and may imply that these genes are important in the regulation and/or adaptation to the environments [34].
Table
Table 1. Pollen type and growth form of four Taiwanese Scutellaria species used in this study.
Table 1. Pollen type and growth form of four Taiwanese Scutellaria species used in this study.
SpeciesPollenGrowth Form
Size (μm)ExineStemInflorescencePetal and Corolla
S. indica(18–23) × (12–17)Finely reticulateErect or procumbent at baseTerminal loose racemeGeniculate at base, purple, pink or white
S. tashiroi(18–22) × (14–17)Loose reticulate to rugulateSlender, procumbent, tuftedAxillary, seldom terminal racemeCurve at base, dark purple
S. playfairii(16–20) × (10–15)Loose reticulate to rugulateErect, seldom tuftedTerminal loose racemeGeniculate at base, whitish purple
S. taiwanensis(23–30) × (16–20)Irregular rugulateErect, often tuftedTerminal loose racemeGeniculate at base, white with purple spot
Table
Table 2. Putative functions of Scutellaria R2R3-MYBs.
Table 2. Putative functions of Scutellaria R2R3-MYBs.
GroupFunctionSpeciesReference
MYB2/7/11Shoot and axillary meristems formationArabidopsis thaliana (S14) a[28]
Flavonoid regulation through GA metabolism; regulate PAL, C4H, CHS, CHI and UFGTScutellaria baicalensis[27]
MYB8Induction of anthocyanin accumulationArabidopsis thaliana (S6) a and Nicotiana tabacum[29]
Sharing similar expression pattern with C4H and CHS after GA treatmentScutellaria baicalensis[27]
MYB13/19Alternation of expression level of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes and pigment accumulation under cold stressArabidopsis thaliana (AtMYB3)[12]
Brassica oleracea[30]
Nicotiana tabacum[31]
MYB15Regulation of serine/threonine protein phosphatases to enhance salt or drought toleranceArabidopsis thaliana (AtMYB20)[32,33]
MYB16MicroRNA regulation and anther and pollen developmentArabidopsis thaliana (S18) a[17]
a Subgroup of MYB family defined by Kranz et al. [28]. S14: AtMYB68, AtMYB36; S6: AtMYB90; S18: AtMYB65; GA: Gibberellic acid; PAL: Phenylalanine ammonia lyase; C4H: Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; CHS: Chalcone synthase; CHI: Chalcone isomerase; UFGT: UDP-glucose flavonoid glucosyl-transferase.
To examine the evolutionary role of the R2R3-MYBs for the adaptive divergence of skullcaps, we identified the R2R3-MYBs from transcriptomes extracted from the inflorescence buds of four phylogenetically closely related species, S. taiwanensis, S. indica, S. playfairii, and S. tashiroi, and collected sequences from the published shoot transcriptome of Scutellaria montana from the online 1KP database (Accession ID: ATYL) and R2R3-MYBs of S. baicalensis from NCBI GenBank. Four specific questions were addressed here: (1) What kind of R2R3-MYBs are expressed in the inflorescence buds? (2) Does selective pressure shape the evolution of the R2R3-MYBs in rapidly evolving skullcaps? (3) Are the recently duplicated paralogs of R2R3-MYB genes functionally divergent in skullcaps? (4) What are the evolutionary mechanisms of these recently duplicated genes? Based on data mining from the transcriptomes database, we collected Scutellaria R2R3-MYB genes expressed in the inflorescence buds and conducted genetic analyses to answer the above questions.

2. Results

2.1. Gene Annotation by Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) Analyses

In our ~140-megabase transcriptomic libraries, the mean size of scaffolds is 630 bps and 76,750, 69,811, 44,544, and 69,921 unique contigs were obtained in S. indica, S. tashiroi, S. playfairii, and S. taiwanense, respectively, after trimming. Seven R2R3-MYBs were identified from the EST contig library of inflorescence bud transcriptomes of Scutellaria, including MYB2/7, MYB8, MYB11, MYB13, MYB15, MYB16, and MYB19, corresponding with Arabidopsis AtMYB68 (S14), AtMYB90 (S6), AtMYB36 (S14), AtMYB5, AtMYB20, AtMYB65 (S18), and AtMYB5, respectively (Table 3). Among these gene families, both MYB2/7 and MYB11, corresponding to AtMYB68 (S14), are suggested to be a paralogous relationship; MYB13 and MYB19, corresponding to AtMYB5, are also a paralogous relationship. These Scutellaria MYB genes have relatively abundant reads revealed in Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKM) in the transcriptome database, and was suggested to have certain degrees of expression in inflorescence buds of Scutellaria species. The closer groupings of these R2R3-MYBs expressing in inflorescence buds suggest that the paralogous relationships of these genes could be due to recent duplication in genus Scutellaria.
Table
Table 3. Grouping of R2R3-MYBs by phylogenetic analysis and tBLASTx result by searching to Arabidopsis thaliana. The grouping name was based on the R2R3-MYBs of Scutellaria baicalensis [27].
Table 3. Grouping of R2R3-MYBs by phylogenetic analysis and tBLASTx result by searching to Arabidopsis thaliana. The grouping name was based on the R2R3-MYBs of Scutellaria baicalensis [27].
Group NamePhylogenetic GroupingtBLASTx to Arabidopsis
StasSplaSindStaiSbaiSmonAmborellaArabidopsisSolanumOryzaAccession NumberE-Value
MYB16KP167623KP167610KP167603KP167617KF008651ATYL_2013395––XM_004236340–NM_1119777 × 10−69
(Stas_9284)(Spla_28842)(Sind_28842)(Stai_7654)(SbMYB16)(AtMYB65)
MYB15KP167621KP167607KP167598–KF008664ATYL_2028518XM_006837947NM_105294XM_004236642NM_001070300NM_1052941 × 10−85
(Stas_14132)(Spla_13224)(Sind_16195)(AtMYB20)NM_001054563(AtMYB20)
NM_121666NM_001063857
(AtMYB43)NM_001068382
NM_001069653
MYB8KP167618KP167606KP167604KP167613KF008657ATYL_2121808XM_006849579AF048841XM_004252468AF0629153 × 10−57
(AtMYB82)(AtMYB90)
NM_123397
(AtMYB23)–
MYB2/7/11XM_006837947XM_004245674NM_001186451
XM_004248305
MYB11KP167619KP167609KP167600–KF008660ATYL_2012934––––NM_1251437 × 10−63
(SbMYB11)(AtMYB36)
MYB2/7–KP167611KP167605KP167615KC990835ATYL_2108188/2121208––––AF0629019 × 10−71
(SbMYB2)(AtMYB68)
KC990836
(SbMYB7)
MYB13/19XM_006854550-XM_004253144
XM_004246040
XM_004244680
MYB13KP167622KP167608KP167601KP167616KF008662–––––NM_1122003 × 10−40
KP167599(SbMYB13)(AtMYB5)
MYB19KP167620KP167612KP167602KP167614KF008667ATYL_2029067––––NM_1122001 × 10−61
(SbMYB19)(AtMYB5)

2.2. Phylogenetic Analyses

Cladograms reconstructed by nucleotide sequences and amino acid sequences revealed inconsistent topologies in basal lineages. Although the relationships of the R2R3-MYB paralogs cannot be well resolved, consistent grouping of Scutellaria R2R3-MYBs with their orthologous genes of Arabidopsis, tomato, rice, and Amborella were shown in both nucleotide and amino acid trees (Figure S1). The phylogenetic analysis based on the amino acid alignments of conserved region (Figure S2), seven major clades of Scutellaria R2R3-MYBs are shown in Figure 1 and revealed close grouping between clades MYB2/7 and MYB11 and between clades MYB13 and MYB19, congruent with the inference of paralogous relationships made from BLAST searches. However, the phylogenetic grouping patterns among the Scutellaria R2R3-MYBs and the AtMYBs are incongruent with the BLAST results (Table 3), which is probably due to (1) imperfect alignments between diversified taxa and paralogs, and (2) interference by homoplasious codons. The homoplasy is probably due to the long-term evolution of independent lineages having caused a high accumulation of variations between those lineages and, alternatively, may be caused by rapid divergence under positive selection. To investigate the alternative homoplasious cause of selective pressures on genes of recently evolved taxa (i.e., infra-genus species), in which scenario the observed variation was not due to gradual long-term changes, we used the phylogenetic analyses by maximum likelihood (PAML) method to detect signatures of positive selection.

2.3. Codon-Specific Positive Selection

The site model analyses indicated that the positive selection models M2a and M8 were better fits for MYB16 by rejecting the null models M1a (p = 0.038), M7 (p = 0.038), and M8a (p = 0.013), and that they were also better fits for MYB11 by rejecting the null models M1a (p = 0.032) and M8a (p = 0.048) (Table 4). The site model M7 could not be confidently rejected in favor of M8 in MYB11 (p = 0.082). In MYB16, two alignment sites, 97P and 196C, had an estimated ω > 1 in both M2a and M8 models despite relatively low posterior probabilities for 97P (<0.8, Figure 2); in MYB11, four and seven codons had an estimated ω > 1 in M2a and M8 models, respectively, but only the 134Y codon in the M8 model had a posterior probability >0.8 (Figure 2). Except for MYB16 and MYB11, no null models (M1a, M7, and M8a) could be rejected by the alternative positive-selection models (M2a and M8) for other R2R3-MYB genes by likelihood-ratio tests (LRTs) (i.e., p > 0.05, Table 4).
Ijms 16 05900 g001 1024
Figure 1. Neighbor-joining (NJ) tree of the R2R3-MYB paralogs expressed in the Scutellaria inflorescence buds and the corresponding sequences collected from GenBank. The NJ tree is reconstructed from realigned amino-acid sequences chosen from the preliminary NJ analyses (Figure S1). Amtri: Amborella trichopoda; At: Arabidopsis thaliana; Os: Oryza sativa; Sbai: Scutellaria baicalensis; Sind: Scutellaria indica; Sly: Solanum lycopersicum; Smon: Scutellaria montana; Spla: Scutellaria playfairii; Stai: Scutellaria taiwanensis; Stas: Scutellaria tashiroi.
Figure 1. Neighbor-joining (NJ) tree of the R2R3-MYB paralogs expressed in the Scutellaria inflorescence buds and the corresponding sequences collected from GenBank. The NJ tree is reconstructed from realigned amino-acid sequences chosen from the preliminary NJ analyses (Figure S1). Amtri: Amborella trichopoda; At: Arabidopsis thaliana; Os: Oryza sativa; Sbai: Scutellaria baicalensis; Sind: Scutellaria indica; Sly: Solanum lycopersicum; Smon: Scutellaria montana; Spla: Scutellaria playfairii; Stai: Scutellaria taiwanensis; Stas: Scutellaria tashiroi.
Ijms 16 05900 g001
Ijms 16 05900 g002 1024
Figure 2. Site-specific profile of the positive selection site models M2a and M8 in MYB11 and MYB16. Horizontal dot line indicates the criterion of posterior probability 0.8.
Figure 2. Site-specific profile of the positive selection site models M2a and M8 in MYB11 and MYB16. Horizontal dot line indicates the criterion of posterior probability 0.8.
Ijms 16 05900 g002
Table
Table 4. Likelihood ratio tests for the site model analyses in Scutellaria R2R3-MYB genes. Subgroups of AtMYB family defined by Kranz et al. (1998) was provided for characterizing the MYBs of Scutellaria defined by Yuan et al. [27].
Table 4. Likelihood ratio tests for the site model analyses in Scutellaria R2R3-MYB genes. Subgroups of AtMYB family defined by Kranz et al. (1998) was provided for characterizing the MYBs of Scutellaria defined by Yuan et al. [27].
ModelAtMYB5-LikeS6S14AtMYB20S18
MYB 19MYB 13MYB 8MYB 7MYB 11MYB 15MYB 16
M1alnL−1869.28−1419.48−2050.95−1685.91−1763.79−1803.50−2587.30
M2alnL−1869.28−1419.24−2050.84−1685.59−1761.03−1802.53−2584.73
2ΔL00.490.220.635.521.945.13
p10.3910.4490.3640.0320.190.038
M7lnL−1869.74−1419.61−2051.38−1686.13−1764.06−1804.13−2587.32
M8lnL−1869.28−1419.24−2050.84−1685.59−1762.24−1802.53−2584.74
2ΔL0.920.741.071.073.633.25.17
p0.4910.3450.2930.2930.0820.1010.038
M8alnL−1869.28−1419.48−2050.95−1685.91−1763.80−1803.51−2587.34
M8lnL−1869.28−1419.24−2050.84−1685.59−1762.24−1802.53−2584.74
2ΔL00.490.220.633.111.965.19
p0.50.4470.7550.3650.0480.1070.013
p values < 0.05 are remarked in bold.

2.4. Cluster-Specific Positive Selection and Functional Divergence

For testing whether specific paralogous R2R3-MYBs revealed signatures of natural selection, we further performed the clade model test in PAML. The LRTs showed that the nearly neutral model (M1a) was significantly rejected by clade model C in all analyses of different backgrounds (Table 5). The clade MYB19 was the only foreground clade that has an estimated ω > 1, while the other clades were estimated to have ω < 1 (Table 5). This result indicated that the Scutellaria MYB19 could have been subject to directional selection after gene duplication. In contrast, the MYB19 paralog, MYB13, has extremely low ω (=0.0001), indicating strong purifying selection.
In order to confirm the inference of positive selection on MYB19 of Scutellaria, we used the branch-site model to test whether clade MYB19 is rapidly evolving in nonsynonymous sites, in contrast to the other R2R3-MYBs. Significant results of LRT indicated that small fractions of codons (2.72%) of Scutellaria MYB19 have an estimated ω = 11.1973 (Table 6). The alignment codon site 15K (posterior probability = 0.994) of MYB19 was the only codon inferred to be positively selected with a posterior probability > 0.95.
Table
Table 5. Results of clade model analyses and the likelihood ratio tests.
Table 5. Results of clade model analyses and the likelihood ratio tests.
BackgroundAmborellaArabidopsisOryzaSolanum
M1a (Null model)
np101113109121
lnL−2402.594−2695.469−2735.734−3170.464
Site classClass 0Class 1Class 0Class 1Class 0Class 1Class 0Class 1
Proportion0.9380.0620.8690.1310.8240.1760.999990.00001
ω0.04210.04110.04210.0391
Clade Model C
np110122118130
lnL−2321.832−2606.658−2656.505−3059.730
Site classClass 0Class 1Class 2Class 0Class 1Class 2Class 0Class 1Class 2Class 0Class 1Class 2
Proportion0.69800.3020.71000.2900.6760.0340.2900.68700.313
ωBackground0.01010.1540.01310.1830.01410.2850.01010.134
ωMYB2/70.01010.0620.01310.1010.01410.0400.01010.045
ωMYB110.01010.0370.01310.1960.01410.0970.01010.056
ωMYB150.01010.0280.01310.0000.01410.0170.01010.000
ωMYB160.01010.2070.01310.1140.01410.0850.01010.039
ωMYB80.01010.0540.01310.0580.01410.0290.01010.160
ωMYB130.01010.0000.01310.0000.01410.0000.01010.000
ωMYB190.01019990.01319990.01419990.0101999
LRT
2ΔL161.525177.623158.457221.469
df9999
p3.58 × 10−301.59 × 10−331.55 × 10−291.03 × 10−42
Table
Table 6. Results of branch-site model analysis and the likelihood ratio tests for the foreground branch MYB19.
Table 6. Results of branch-site model analysis and the likelihood ratio tests for the foreground branch MYB19.
ModelnplnLParameterClass 0Class 1Class 2aClass 2b
Model A ω = 1 fixed82−1486.769Proportion0.76300.17280.05230.0119
Background ω0.028510.02851
Foreground ω0.0285111
Model A83−1484.552Proportion0.79300.17980.02220.0050
Background ω0.029210.02921
Foreground ω0.0292111.197311.1973
LRT a2ΔL = 4.434, p = 0.0176
a The p value is calculated by 50:50 mixture distribution of point mass 0 and χ2 with df = 1. Positive sites for foreground lineages Prob (ω > 1): 15K (Prob = 0.994).
We further performed type-I and type-II functional divergence analyses for the paralogous pair MYB13 and MYB19 and another paralogous pair, MYB2/7 and MYB11. Both a Z-score test (p < 0.00001) and LRT (p = 0.00002) for the estimated θI showed significant type-I functional divergence between MYB13 and MYB19, but not for the paralogous pair MYB2/7 and MYB11 (p = 0.099 in Z-score test and 0.956 in LRT, Table 7). The significant type-I divergence between the paralogous pair MYB13 and MYB19, which indicates heterogeneous evolutionary rates after duplication, is consistent with the estimated ω of MYB13 (ω ≪ 1) and MYB19 (ω ≫ 1) by clade model C analysis in PAML (Table 6). In contrast, the type-II functional divergence analysis showed significant divergence between MYB2/7 and MYB11 by Z-score test (p = 0.042) but not for the paralogous pair MYB13 and MYB19 (p = 0.073) (Table 7). If the indels were not considered, two of 55 aligned amino acid sites (3.64%) of the R2 and R3 domains received a ratio score >9 (i.e., posterior probability > 0.9 or false positive rate < 10%) while seven of 55 alignments (12.73%) received a ratio score >2.33 (i.e., posterior probability > 0.7) specifying cluster-specific radical changes between MYB2/7 and MYB11 (Figure 3).
Table
Table 7. Summary of type-I and type-II functional divergence.
Table 7. Summary of type-I and type-II functional divergence.
Type-I Functional DivergenceType-II Functional Divergence
ParameterMYB19 vs. MYB13MYB7/11 vs. MYB2ParameterMYB19 vs. MYB13MYB7/11 vs. MYB2
θI1.021−0.413θII0.0520.125
SE θI0.1610.293SE θII0.0360.072
p of θI Z-score<0.000010.099p of θII Z-score0.0730.042
θIML0.9990.006aR/πR1.4051.869
AlphaML0.0060.126GR/GC10.864
SE θI0.2340.050F00,N0.9270.727
LRT θI18.2890.003F00,R0.0180.036
p of LRT θI1.898 × 10−50.956F00,C0.0180.091
aR/πR: the ratio of radical change under functional divergence versus nonfunctional divergence; GR and GC, proportion of radical change and conserved change, respectively; F00,N, F00,R, and F00,C, proportion of none change, radical change, and conserved change of amino acids between clusters but no change within clusters, respectively. p value < 0.05 is indicated in bold.
Ijms 16 05900 g003 1024
Figure 3. Site-specific profile for type-II functional divergence between Scutellaria MYB2/7 and MYB11. Horizontal dot lines indicate the criteria of posterior probability 0.9 and 0.7.
Figure 3. Site-specific profile for type-II functional divergence between Scutellaria MYB2/7 and MYB11. Horizontal dot lines indicate the criteria of posterior probability 0.9 and 0.7.
Ijms 16 05900 g003

3. Discussion

3.1. Diversification of R2R3-MYBs in Scutellaria Expressed in Inflorescence Buds

R2R3-MYB sequences collected from inflorescence bud transcriptomes represent the active (expressed) form of these genes in the flowering programs [35]. Use of tissue-specific transcriptomic library to perform analyses of gene diversification and evolutionary rate heterogeneity highlights the co-expression and functional divergence patterns of these duplicated genes [21,36]. The expression of these duplicated MYB genes in the inflorescence buds suggest that these MYBs involve in the regulation function of floral pattern or flowering process [34,35]. Most of the R2R3-MYBs expressed in the inflorescence have been identified to be involved in the regulation of genes related to anthocyanin biosynthesis; for example, FtMYB123L, a homolog of AtMYB123/TT2 expressed in the flower and inflorescence of Fagopyrum tataricum, plays a key role in regulating flavonoid late biosynthetic genes [37]; LhMYB6 and LhMYB12, isolated from the anthocyanin-accumulating tepals of Asiatic hybrid lily (Lilium spp.), regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in flower tepals, tepal spots, and leaves. A recent study indicated that at least two R2R3-MYBs, SbMYB2 and SbMYB7, are involved in flavonoid metabolism in Scutellaria baicalensis [27]. Most of SbMYB genes have fewer paralogs than that found in Populus [38]. The Populus genome encodes more R2R3-MYB family members than either Arabidopsis or Vitis. Expansion of R2R3-MYB family of Populus was not only attributable to whole genome duplication but also multiple segmental and tandem duplication events, so that Populus genome encodes more R2R3-MYB genes than not only other species but also other genes (e.g., R3-MYBs) [38,39]. All Taiwanese Scutellaria species have same chromosome numbers (2n = 26) [8] and no records of genome duplication were reported. In the research performed by Cole et al., both Scutellaria baicalensis and S. racemosa, which have fewer chromosomes (2n = 18), have a smaller genome size (411 and 377 mbp, respectively) than S. lateriflora (950 mbp), which has more chromosomes (2n = 88) [40]. Diversification and expansion of the R2R3-MYB family in Scutellaria could be related to the ancestral genome duplication. However, we do not have enough evidence to correlate the genome size or duplicated genomes with the rapid diversification of R2R3-MYBs in Taiwanese Scutellaria species. Nevertheless, the genome-size effect on the expansion of R2R3-MYB family cannot be exclusively ruled out, and it is worth exploring in the future.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analyses and Functional Annotation

In the phylogenetic grouping, we found that SbMYB2 was closely grouped with the clade of SbMYB7 and other MYB7 orthologs in S. indica (KP167605), S. playfairii (KP167611), S. taiwanensis (KP167615), and S. montana (ATYL 2108188 2121208) with a high bootstrap supporting value (0.97). However, no other sequences were found to be grouped with SbMYB2, indicating that either the inflorescence buds of skullcaps do not express orthologs of MYB2, or SbMYB2 is a recent duplication in S. baicalensis only. Besides, the MYB2/7 clade was grouped with SbMYB11 and its orthologs in skullcaps, but was not individually grouped with sequences of Arabidopsis, tomato, rice, and Amborella, indicating the paralogous relationship of MYB11 and MYB2/7. These two paralogous gene families in skullcaps were grouped with S14 of Arabidopsis thaliana (Figure 1), which functions in the development of shoot and axillary meristems [28]. SbMYB2/7 and SbMYB11 were also suggested to function in the regulation of flavonoid biosynthetic pathways and have been confirmed in Tobacco transgenic experiments (Table 2) [27].
In addition, both MYB13 and MYB19 of skullcaps, which are named after SbMYB13 and SbMYB19, are grouped with Odorant1-like and Hv1-like of tomato (Figure 1) and functionally annotated as regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis and pigment accumulation under cold stress (Table 2) [12,29,30]. However, the BLAST search indicates MYB13 and MYB19 are similar to AtMYB5 (Table 3), which is grouped with (Figure 1). The inconsistency between phylogenetic groupings and the BLAST search is probably caused from high degree of homoplasious variations among distinct taxa or few informative sites to sort sequences of same subfamily. Because of the co-expression of paralogous genes in inflorescence buds in skullcaps, we hypothesized that for the prevention of redundancy between duplicated genes, functional divergence would have occurred between the paralogous genes MYB2/7 and MYB11 and the paralogous pair MYB13 and MYB19 in skullcaps.
The BLAST searches and phylogenetic analysis suggested orthology of MYB8 to AtMYB90 (Figure 1 and Table 3), which functions as the induction of anthocyanin accumulation and expressed in flower buds (Table 2) [28,29]. Besides, tobacco transgenic experiments also confer the function of SbMYB8 in induction of anthocyanin accumulation [41], and support the view that SbMYB8 and AtMYB90 are orthologous.
Although corresponding transgenic line have not been conducted in MYB15 and MYB16, their expression patterns are not consistent with anthocyanin biosynthesis-related genes (e.g., CHS and PAL) [42], suggesting that MYB15 and MYB16 are not involved in regulation of anthocyanins. These two genes may function in the regulation of stress tolerance [32,33] and anther and pollen development [17], respectively (Table 2). The AtMYB20 promoter, an ortholog of MYB15, was found to drive β-glucuronidase (GUS) expression in several tissues including the sepal and style of flowers under the NaCl treatment, and this result was confirmed by RT-PCR experiments [32]. The expression of MYB15 in skullcaps is probably a response to harsh soil substrates in nature, but more experimental data are needed to confirm the link between MYB15 and adaptation to stress in skullcaps. MYB16 is orthologous to AtMYB65 (S18), which facilitates, but is not essential for, the development of anthers and pollen, with a particular role in the formation of the tapetum, a nutritive layer of pollen grains [17]. The tapetum cells have unique organelle tapetosomes, which secrete flavonoids, alkanes, and oleosins to the surface of the maturing pollen as pollen coats [42], and cause the variation of microtraits on the pollen surface (i.e., exine, Table 1). The variation of pollen surface microtraits might influence the strategy and efficiency of pollination and be related to the reproductive isolation of skullcaps [43].
In general, the R2R3-MYB genes expressed in the inflorescence buds have ecological functions related to pollinator attraction and/or response to stresses, thus the genetic variation of these R2R3-MYB genes might not be randomly accumulated, but rather be a consequence of natural selection. To verify this hypothesis, we performed further genetic analyses to detect signals of positive selection and test for functional divergence between paralogous genes.

3.3. Positive Selection on Scutellaria MYB11 and MYB16

MYB11 and MYB16 have relatively high ω (>1) indicating that positive selection could have affected the evolution of these two gene families. MYB11 functions in the regulation of stem and leaf growth forms and the development of the axillary meristems of inflorescences [14,15], while MYB16 is functionally relevant to the microRNA regulation of filament development and pollen maturation [17]. According to these functional annotations, we suggested that the high nonsynonymous mutation rates that we found for the Scutellaria MYB11 and MYB16 might be related to the adaptive divergence of plant growth forms, including the stem/leaf structure and the inflorescence branching pattern, in these studied skullcaps species [14,15,17]. Species of Taiwanese skullcaps, which have been suggested to be rapidly evolving [9], are morphologically varied in petal colors and vegetation forms (Table 1). High interspecific variation in the pollen size and exine, which are major taxonomic characters in Scutellaria [44], and which are regulated by MYB16, could be related to the pollinator shift between different Scutellaria species [43]. The positive sites 134Y in MYB11 and 196C in MYB16, both of which had high posterior probabilities, are located within the DNA-binding domain. Selective constraints usually appeared in functionally important regions, such as the DNA-binding domain [45]. There are three helices in the DNA-binding domain, and the amino acid changes in these helices could cause alteration or loss of protein function [46,47]. Such amino acid replacements in the DNA-binding domain were suggested to be an important mechanism for regulating the diversification of downstream genes and a major driving force for plant diversification [47]. The positive selection on these functionally constrained regions could indicate adaptive changes in protein functions during the evolution of skullcaps. Positive selection on the genes regarding these phenotypic variations suggested the enhancement of the fitness of skullcaps for adaptively relevant environments via increasing the amino acid replacement rates. Floral diversification, which plays key roles in mediating evolutionary transitions and may explain the adaptive radiation of skullcaps, could be driven by shifts between pollinators [48].

3.4. Different Types of Functional Divergence between Recent Duplicated Paralogs in Scutellaria R2R3-MYBs

The recently duplicated genes MYB13/MYB19 and MYB2/7/MYB11, which are co-expressed in inflorescence buds, were hypothesized to have been subjected to partitioning of ancestral function (sub-F) or functional divergence (neo-F) to prevent functional redundancy after duplication [49,50,51]. We therefore tested the signatures of functional divergence between these two paralogs. Two types of functional divergence, the heterogeneous evolutionary rates between duplicates (type-I) and radical amino acid replacements between duplicates (type-II), were found in Scutellaria MYB13/MYB19 and MYB2/7/MYB11, respectively (Table 7). We do not know the exact functions of these recently duplicated paralogs due to a lack of physiological and molecular experimental evidence. In other words, we do not understand where (in which tissues) and when (at what stages) these genes are expressed, apart from their known expression in inflorescence buds. However, from the genetic analyses, the significantly different evolutionary rates between MYB13 and MYB19 indicated that these simultaneously expressed genes suffered different selective pressures. The accelerated evolutionary rates in MYB19 could imply the acquisition of novel functions (neo-F) or amplification of a previous neutral minor function (Innovation-Amplification-Divergence (IAD) model), involving positive selection [52,53]. In contrast, its paralogous gene MYB13, which was selectively constrained, with extremely low ω, was suggested to preserve ancestral function [52]. Differential selective pressures increase the fitness entropy to move toward novel stationary phases with respect to the surroundings and allow the coexistence of newly derived paralogs.
In contrast to the type-I functional divergence of duplicates MYB13/MYB19, evolutionary rate homogeneity was not rejected between duplicates of MYB2/7 and MYB11, but these two duplicates revealed radical amino acid changes (Table 7 and Figure 3). Despite a small ratio of radical change to conserved change (GR/GC = 0.864) and only 3.6% fixed radical differences (F00,R) being found between these two duplicates, which are the two amino acids at the 91st and 101st alignment sites with posterior probability >0.9 (Figure 3), the relatively small proportion of radical change could potentially have caused the functional divergence. However, despite radical replacements between these two copies, no positive selection signals were detected between MYB2/7 and MYB11 (Table 5 and Table 7). Both MYB2/7 and MYB11 were subjected to purifying selection with a lower ω than that of the backgrounds (Table 5). The phenomenon of both copies remaining in the genome but having evolved under purifying selection or strong selective constraints could reflect the advantage of dosage effects of functionally redundant duplicates or alternatively reflect their diverged functions [54,55]. If these two duplicated gene pairs were functionally redundant but had an advantageous dosage effect, we could expect that the radical changes would not be found between them. The significant type-II functional divergence found between these duplicates rejects the advantages-of-dosage-effect hypothesis. We suggest that the functional divergence of these two duplicates has already become complex and both paralogs have reached a state of functional constraint. The long-term retention and coexistent expression of duplicates suffering purifying selection is commonly observed in cotton [56] and Arabidopsis [57], but most of the duplicated gene pairs exhibit divergent expression between tissues [56]. MYB2/7/11 paralogs could function in regulating the expression of several anthocyanin biosynthetic enzymes, including Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase (PAL), Cinnamate 4-Hydroxylase (C4H), Chalcone Synthase (CHS), Chalcone Isomerase (CHI), and UDP-glucose Flavonoid Glucosyl-Transferase (UFGT) [27]. Functional subdivision is helpful for increasing the efficiency of gene regulation. Although only a small fraction of functionally divergent codons was found (Figure 3), these radical changes could have adaptive relevance for the floral diversity. Because we pooled several samples of the same species to obtain the consensus gene sequences instead of individually sequencing transcriptomes, the relative expression level of paralogs cannot be obtained by counting sequence reads (i.e., fragments per kb of transcript per million mapped reads), and thus the potential existence of a gene dosage or genetic buffering effect could not be confirmed by this study. However, this research provides statistical evidence to illustrate the radical functional divergence of the MYB2/7 and MYB11 paralogs. Further manipulative experiments are required to elucidate the evolutionary and functional processes of the retention and co-expression of these duplicated genes.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Data Collection, de Novo Transcriptome Assembly, and Annotation

Transcriptomic libraries of the inflorescence buds of S. taiwanensis, S. indica, S. playfairii, and S. tashiroi were constructed by transcriptome de novo sequencing by Illumina Solexa technology. For enriching the sequence data, the published shoot transcriptome data of S. montana were down-loaded from the 1KP database (Accession ID: ATYL). Removing artifacts from RNA-Seq reads before assembly can improve the accuracy and computational efficiency of assembly [58]. Therefore, raw RNA-Seq reads were controlled by quality score. Bad quality reads (score < 20) were trimmed using our PERL scripts. Then, reads that have length ≥25 bps on both sides of paired-end format were kept for further analyses. Filtered reads were assembled de novo using Trinity (Trinityrnaseq_r2013-02-25) [59]. Trinity was used with the defaulting parameters including a fixed k-mer at 25 bp.
Eleven MYBs identified as the R2R3-MYBs from S. baicalensis were used as references for local BLAST alignment to our expressed sequence tag (EST) contig libraries of inflorescence-bud transcriptomes. Sequences of the first three highest e-values with >50% coverage were sampled. Putative R2R3-MYBs of skullcaps were reconfirmed by a bidirectional best hit (BBH) approach and BLAST alignment to the sequences obtained from the NCBI GenBank database. The confirmed R2R3-MYBs of Scutellaria were further aligned using the MUSCLE multiple sequence alignment software tool [60,61]. Arabidopsis, tomato, rice, and Amborella R2R3-MYBs were used for neighbor-joining (NJ) comparison with these putative R2R3-MYBs of Scutellaria to confirm their orthology. The Jones–Taylor–Thornton substitution model with a 95% coverage cutoff, partial deletion, and 1000 times bootstrap replicates was used for NJ analysis. Orthologous sequences of Scutellaria R2R3-MYB genes that expressed in inflorescence buds and the Arabidopsis, tomato, rice, and Amborella R2R3-MYB orthologs were further selected to reconstruct fine-scale evolutionary trees by the NJ method. Sequences used in this study were deposited in the NCBI database (Accession number: KP167598–KP167623).

4.2. Detecting Positive Selection

Heterogeneous nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution rates (dN and dS) were estimated to detect selective pressures using the codeml program distributed with the PAML software package [62]. An excess of dN indicates rapid amino acid replacements and implies positive selection on the gene, and in this case the dN/dS ratio, denoted as ω, would be >1; in contrast, an excess of dS indicates the elimination of disadvantage replacements, suggesting purifying selection or selective constraints (ω < 1); if dN = dS (or ω = 1); this means that silent and missense mutations appeared randomly, i.e., the gene evolved neutrally. Likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) were used to evaluate the better fitting model from the comparison pairs of M1a (nearly neutral) vs. M2a (positive selection), M7 (the β model) vs. M8 (beta plus positive selection model), M8a (beta and ω = 1) vs. M8 in site model test, and M1a vs. model C in clade model. For the clade model C, each Scutellaria R2R3-MYB subfamily was specified as an independent foreground clade and compared with background, comprising Arabidopsis, tomato, rice, and Amborella, to test which specific subfamily has the most rapid replacement rate for diversifying the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in inflorescence buds of Scutellaria species. The specific clade that has higher ω (i.e., ω > 1) was further set as the foreground branch in branch-site model analysis to identify codons that are putatively under positive selection. When performing the branch-site model analysis, we used the Scutellaria sequences only to prevent high saturation in nucleotide replacement that may bias the selection analyses. Branch-site model A was used for comparison with the modified null model A with a corresponding fixed value of ω2 = 1. For obtaining convergence results, we performed the site-model, clade-model, and branch-site-model analyses multiple times using different initial ω and the number of categories of NSsite model (ncatG). Because all runs showed convergent inferences of positive selection signals, the results with the simplest setting was adopted in this study.

4.3. Functional Divergence Analyses

Function divergence between two paralogous pairs, MYB2/7 vs. MYB11 and MYB13 vs. MYB19, was inferred by type-I (Gu99) and type-II divergence analyses using the software program DIVERGE version 3 [63] with 500 bootstrap replications. Type-I functional divergence suggests heterogeneous evolutionary rates between duplicated genes, while type-II functional divergence suggests radical changes to biochemical properties (charge positive/negative, hydrophilic/hydrophobic) between duplicates. Site-specific estimation of the posterior probability of radical changes was performed to assess the probable regions and shifts of biochemical properties between paralogous groups. The posterior ratio given by the equation R(k) = Q(k)/[1 − Q(k)] was used to calculate the posterior probability of sites with type-II divergent functions, where Q is the specific score for site k related to type-II functional divergence [64].

5. Conclusions

In this research, signals of positive selection were detected in two MYB genes that were co-expressed in the inflorescence buds of Scutellaria species, in contrast to the previous reports of relaxed selective constraints on anthocyanin-regulating transcription factors [45,65,66]. This finding showed drastic differences in evolutionary rates and radical amino acid changes between R2R3-MYB duplicates in rapidly evolving Scutellaria species. Regulatory genes exhibit complicated evolutionary mechanisms responsible for morphological diversity, which are relevant to adaptation and speciation [67,68]. This study not only presents evidence for rapid and diversified evolution in Scutellaria R2R3-MYBs but also indicates the significance of the duplication and sub-F/neo-F of regulatory genes for the diversification of adaptive traits.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/16/03/5900/s1.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Kui Lin for his valuable advice on this study. This research was financially supported by the National Science Council in Taiwan (NSC 102-2621-B-003-005-MY3). This article was subsidized by the National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU), Taiwan.

Author Contributions

Pei-Chun Liao conceived and designed the experiments. Bing-Hong Huang and Yi-Wen Chen performed the experiments and constructed the transcriptomic library. Erli Pang and Huifen Cao conducted the de novo transcriptome assembly. Bing-Hong Huang, Yu Ruan and Pei-Chun Liao analyzed the genetic data. Bing-Hong Huang, Erli Pang, and Pei-Chun Liao wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mol, J.; Grotewold, E.; Koes, R. How genes paint flowers and seeds. Trends Plant Sci. 1998, 3, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Malcomber, S.T.; Preston, J.C.; Reinheimer, R.; Kossuth, J.; Kellogg, E.A. Developmental gene evolution and the origin of grass inflorescence diversity. Adv. Bot. Res. 2006, 44, 425–481. [Google Scholar]
  3. Linhart, Y.B.; Grant, M.C. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1996, 27, 237–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Evans, L.M.; Slavov, G.T.; Rodgers-Melnick, E.; Martin, J.; Ranjan, P.; Muchero, W.; Brunner, A.M.; Schackwitz, W.; Gunter, L.; Chen, J.G.; et al. Population genomics of Populus trichocarpa identifies signatures of selection and adaptive trait associations. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 1089–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Johnson, N.A.; Porter, A.H. Rapid speciation via parallel, directional selection on regulatory genetic pathways. J. Theor. Biol. 2000, 205, 527–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rebollo, R.; Horard, B.; Hubert, B.; Vieira, C. Jumping genes and epigenetics: Towards new species. Gene 2010, 454, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wolf, J.B.W.; Lindell, J.; Backstrom, N. Speciation genetics: Current status and evolving approaches. Philos. Trans. B 2010, 365, 1717–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, T.-C. Notes on the Flora of Taiwan (35)-Scutellaria taipeiensis T.C. Huang, A. Hsiao et M.J. Wu sp. nov. (Lamiaceae). Taiwania 2003, 48, 129–137. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chiang, Y.C.; Huang, B.H.; Liao, P.C. Diversification, biogeographic pattern, and demographic history of Taiwanese Scutellaria species inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA. PLoS One 2012, 7, e50844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dao, T.T.H.; Linthorst, H.J.M.; Verpoorte, R. Chalcone synthase and its functions in plant resistance. Phytochem. Rev. 2011, 10, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tohge, T.; Nishiyama, Y.; Hirai, M.Y.; Yano, M.; Nakajima, J.; Awazuhara, M.; Inoue, E.; Takahashi, H.; Goodenowe, D.B.; Kitayama, M.; et al. Functional genomics by integrated analysis of metabolome and transcriptome of Arabidopsis plants over-expressing an MYB transcription factor. Plant J. 2005, 42, 218–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dubos, C.; Stracke, R.; Grotewold, E.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C.; Lepiniec, L. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stracke, R.; Werber, M.; Weisshaar, B. The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Keller, T.; Abbott, J.; Moritz, T.; Doerner, P. Arabidopsis regulator of axillary meristems1 controls a leaf axil stem cell niche and modulates vegetative development. Plant Cell Online 2006, 18, 598–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Müller, D.; Schmitz, G.; Theres, K. Blind homologous R2R3 Myb genes control the pattern of lateral meristem initiation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Online 2006, 18, 586–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baumann, K.; Perez-Rodriguez, M.; Bradley, D.; Venail, J.; Bailey, P.; Jin, H.L.; Koes, R.; Roberts, K.; Martin, C. Control of cell and petal morphogenesis by R2R3 MYB transcription factors. Development 2007, 134, 1691–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Millar, A.A.; Gubler, F. The Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes, MYB33 and MYB65, are MicroRNA-regulated genes that redundantly facilitate anther development. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 705–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fraser, L.G.; Seal, A.G.; Montefiori, M.; McGhie, T.K.; Tsang, G.K.; Datson, P.M.; Hilario, E.; Marsh, H.E.; Dunn, J.K.; Hellens, R.P.; et al. An R2R3 MYB transcription factor determines red petal colour in an Actinidia (kiwifruit) hybrid population. BMC Genomics 2013, 14, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Streisfeld, M.A.; Young, W.N.; Sobel, J.M. Divergent selection drives genetic differentiation in an R2R3-MYB transcription factor that contributes to incipient speciation in Mimulus aurantiacus. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Takahashi, R.; Yamagishi, N.; Yoshikawa, N. A MYB transcription factor controls flower color in soybean. J. Hered. 2013, 104, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chen, Y.N.; Mao, Y.; Liu, H.L.; Yu, F.X.; Li, S.X.; Yin, T.M. Transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes relevant to variegation in peach flowers. PLoS One 2014, 9, e90842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Uematsu, C.; Katayama, H.; Makino, I.; Inagaki, A.; Arakawa, O.; Martin, C. Peace, a MYB-like transcription factor, regulates petal pigmentation in flowering peach “Genpei” bearing variegated and fully pigmented flowers. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1081–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hopkins, R.; Rausher, M.D. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower color allele drives reinforcement. Science 2012, 335, 1090–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liao, P.C.; Huang, B.H. National Taiwan Normal University: Taiwan, Unpublished work. 2015.
  25. Dias, A.P.; Braun, E.L.; McMullen, M.D.; Grotewold, E. Recently duplicated maize R2R3 Myb genes provide evidence for distinct mechanisms of evolutionary divergence after duplication. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 610–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Grotewold, E.; Sainz, M.B.; Tagliani, L.; Hernandez, J.M.; Bowen, B.; Chandler, V.L. Identification of the residues in the Myb domain of maize C1 that specify the interaction with the bHLH cofactor R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13579–13584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yuan, Y.; Wu, C.; Liu, Y.J.; Yang, J.; Huang, L.Q. The Scutellaria baicalensis R2R3-MYB transcription factors modulates flavonoid biosynthesis by regulating GA metabolism in transgenic tobacco plants. PLoS One 2013, 8, e77275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kranz, H.D.; Denekamp, M.; Greco, R.; Jin, H.; Leyva, A.; Meissner, R.C.; Petroni, K.; Urzainqui, A.; Bevan, M.; Martin, C. Towards functional characterisation of the members of the R2R3-MYB gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Borevitz, J.O.; Xia, Y.; Blount, J.; Dixon, R.A.; Lamb, C. Activation tagging identifies a conserved MYB regulator of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell Online 2000, 12, 2383–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, B.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhou, S.; Chen, G. A putative functional MYB transcription factor induced by low temperature regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in purple kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala f. tricolor). Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Huang, Z.A.; Zhao, T.; Fan, H.J.; Wang, N.; Zheng, S.S.; Ling, H.Q. The upregulation of NtAN2 expression at low temperature is required for anthocyanin accumulation in juvenile leaves of Lc-transgenic Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). J. Genet. Genomics 2012, 39, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cui, M.H.; Yoo, K.S.; Hyoung, S.; Nguyen, H.T.K.; Kim, Y.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Ok, S.H.; Yoo, S.D.; Shin, J.S. An Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB transcription factor, AtMYB20, negatively regulates type 2C serine/threonine protein phosphatases to enhance salt tolerance. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 1773–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gao, S.; Zhang, Y.L.; Yang, L.; Song, J.B.; Yang, Z.M. AtMYB20 is negatively involved in plant adaptive response to drought stress. Plant Soil 2014, 376, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dubos, C.; le Gourrierec, J.; Baudry, A.; Huep, G.; Lanet, E.; Debeaujon, I.; Routaboul, J.M.; Alboresi, A.; Weisshaar, B.; Lepiniec, L. MYBL2 is a new regulator of flavonoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008, 55, 940–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ballerini, E.S.; Mockaitis, K.; Arnold, M.L. Transcriptome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of floral and leaf MIKCC MADS-box and R2R3 MYB transcription factors from the monocot Iris fulva. Gene 2013, 531, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sharma, N.; Bhalla, P.L.; Singh, M.B. Transcriptome-wide profiling and expression analysis of transcription factor families in a liverwort, Marchantia polymorpha. BMC Genomics 2013, 14, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhou, M.L.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, K.X.; Li, F.L.; Yang, P.Y.; Tang, Y.X.; Wu, Y.M.; Shao, J.R. Identification of TT2 gene from floral transcriptome in Fagopyrum tataricum. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 1331–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tuskan, G.A.; DiFazio, S.; Jansson, S.; Bohlmann, J.; Grigoriev, I.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; Ralph, S.; Rombauts, S.; Salamov, A.; et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 2006, 313, 1596–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wilkins, O.; Nahal, H.; Foong, J.; Provart, N.J.; Campbell, M.M. Expansion and diversification of the Populus R2R3-MYB family of transcription factors. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cole, I.B.; Cao, J.; Alan, A.R.; Saxena, P.K.; Murch, S.J. Comparisons of Scutellaria baicalensis, Scutellaria lateriflora and Scutellaria racemosa: Genome size, antioxidant potential and phytochemistry. Planta Medica 2008, 74, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yuan, Y.; Qi, L.; Yang, J.; Wu, C.; Liu, Y.; Huang, L. A Scutellaria baicalensis R2R3-MYB gene, SbMYB8, regulates flavonoid biosynthesis and improves drought stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hsieh, K.; Huang, A.H.C. Tapetosomes in Brassica tapetum accumulate endoplasmic reticulum-derived flavonoids and alkanes for delivery to the pollen surface. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 582–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Stroo, A. Pollen morphological evolution in bat pollinated plants. Plant Syst. Evol. 2000, 22, 225–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jamzad, Z.; Hasani-Nejad, M. Taxonomic implications of pollen exine morphology in infrageneric classification of Scutellaria (Lamiaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 2014, 32, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chang, S.M.; Lu, Y.Q.; Rausher, M.D. Neutral evolution of the nonbinding region of the anthocyanin regulatory gene Ipmyb1 in Ipomoea. Genetics 2005, 170, 1967–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jia, L.; Clegg, M.T.; Jiang, T. Evolutionary dynamics of the DNA-binding domains in putative R2R3-MYB genes identified from rice subspecies indica and japonica genomes. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hernandez, J.M.; Heine, G.F.; Irani, N.G.; Feller, A.; Kim, M.G.; Matulnik, T.; Chandler, V.L.; Grotewold, E. Different mechanisms participate in the R-dependent activity of the R2R3 MYB transcription factor C1. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 48205–48213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Peter, C.I.; Johnson, S.D. A pollinator shift explains floral divergence in an orchid species complex in South Africa. Ann. Bot. 2014, 113, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nowak, M.A.; Boerlijst, M.C.; Cooke, J.; Smith, J.M. Evolution of genetic redundancy. Nature 1997, 388, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wagner, A. Genetic redundancy caused by gene duplications and its evolution in networks of transcriptional regulators. Biol. Cybern. 1996, 74, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhang, J.Z. Evolution by gene duplication: An update. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bergthorsson, U.; Andersson, D.I.; Roth, J.R. Ohno’s dilemma: Evolution of new genes under continuous selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 17004–17009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nougue, O.; Corbi, J.; Ball, S.G.; Manicacci, D.; Tenaillon, M.I. Molecular evolution accompanying functional divergence of duplicated genes along the plant starch biosynthesis pathway. BMC Evolut. Biol. 2014, 14, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Osborn, T.C.; Pires, J.C.; Birchler, J.A.; Auger, D.L.; Chen, Z.J.; Lee, H.S.; Comai, L.; Madlung, A.; Doerge, R.W.; Colot, V.; et al. Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends Genet. 2003, 19, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Blanc, G.; Wolfe, K.H. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1679–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Renny-Byfield, S.; Gallagher, J.P.; Grover, C.E.; Szadkowski, E.; Page, J.T.; Udall, J.A.; Wang, X.Y.; Paterson, A.H.; Wendel, J.F. Ancient gene duplicates in Gossypium (Cotton) exhibit near-complete expression divergence. Genome Biol. Evolut. 2014, 6, 559–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Guo, H.; Lee, T.H.; Wang, X.Y.; Paterson, A.H. Function relaxation followed by diversifying selection after whole-genome duplication in flowering plants. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Martin, J.A.; Wang, Z. Next-generation transcriptome assembly. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 671–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: A multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinform. 2004, 5, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yang, Z.H. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1586–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gu, X.; Zou, Y.Y.; Su, Z.X.; Huang, W.; Zhou, Z.; Arendsee, Z.; Zeng, Y.W. An update of DIVERGE software for functional divergence analysis of protein family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1713–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zheng, Y.; Xu, D.P.; Gu, X. Functional divergence after gene duplication and sequence-structure relationship: A case study of G-protein α subunits. J. Exp. Zool. 2007, 308B, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Streisfeld, M.A.; Liu, D.; Rausher, M.D. Predictable patterns of constraint among anthocyanin-regulating transcription factors in Ipomoea. New Phytol. 2011, 191, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Streisfeld, M.A.; Rausher, M.D. Relaxed constraint and evolutionary rate variation between basic helix-loop-helix floral anthocyanin regulators in Ipomoea. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 2816–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Carroll, S.B. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: A genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 2008, 134, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Doebley, J.; Lukens, L. Transcriptional regulators and the evolution of plant form. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, B.-H.; Pang, E.; Chen, Y.-W.; Cao, H.; Ruan, Y.; Liao, P.-C. Positive Selection and Functional Divergence of R2R3-MYB Paralogous Genes Expressed in Inflorescence Buds of Scutellaria Species (Labiatae). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 5900-5921. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16035900

AMA Style

Huang B-H, Pang E, Chen Y-W, Cao H, Ruan Y, Liao P-C. Positive Selection and Functional Divergence of R2R3-MYB Paralogous Genes Expressed in Inflorescence Buds of Scutellaria Species (Labiatae). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(3):5900-5921. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16035900

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Bing-Hong, Erli Pang, Yi-Wen Chen, Huifen Cao, Yu Ruan, and Pei-Chun Liao. 2015. "Positive Selection and Functional Divergence of R2R3-MYB Paralogous Genes Expressed in Inflorescence Buds of Scutellaria Species (Labiatae)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 3: 5900-5921. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16035900

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop