- freely available
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(5), 7711-7730; doi:10.3390/ijms15057711
Published: 5 May 2014
Abstract: Kupffer cells reside within the liver sinusoid and serve as gatekeepers. They produce pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and other biologically important molecules upon the engagement of pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors. Kupffer cell-ablated mice established by in vivo treatment with clodronate liposomes have revealed many important features of Kupffer cells. In this paper, we review the importance of Kupffer cells in murine acute liver injuries and focus on the following two models: lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced liver injury, which is induced by priming with Propionibacterium acnes and subsequent challenge with LPS, and hypercoagulability-mediated acute liver failure such as that in concanavalin A (Con A)-induced hepatitis. Kupffer cells are required for LPS sensitization induced by P. acnes and are a major cellular source of interleukin-18, which induces acute liver injury following LPS challenge. Kupffer cells contribute to Con A-induced acute liver failure by initiating pathogenic, intrasinusoidal thrombosis in collaboration with sinusoidal endothelial cells. The mechanisms underlying these models may shed light on human liver injuries induced by various etiologies such as viral infection and/or abnormal metabolism.
The liver is anatomically connected with the intestinal system by the portal vein. The nutrients absorbed from the digestive system are carried into the mesenteric veins, which converge into the portal vein. Thus, the liver serves as an industrial complex in which the parenchymal cells maintain normal metabolism by utilizing the nutrients to fine-tune the catabolic and anabolic pathways. To efficiently extract nutrients from the food we eat, our digestive system relies on indigenous, commensal resident bacteria. Therefore, the gut-derived bacteria, or their products, can incidentally reach the liver . The liver consists of parenchymal (hepatocytes) and non-parenchymal cells that are primarily divided into three types as follows: Kupffer cells, which are tissue macrophages localized within the liver sinusoid and serve as nurses for homeostatic liver regeneration as well as gatekeepers [2,3]; sinusoidal endothelial cells; and stellate cells, which were originally designated “Ito cells”, that exist within the space of Disse, apart from the sinusoid [1,4] (Figure 1). Lymphocytes reside in the liver as well. Natural killer (NK) cells, which were previously histologically referred to as “pit cells” [5,6], and invariant NK T (NKT) cells, which express NK cell markers and the limited T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) repertoire in Vα and Vβ chains and have the potential to promptly produce large amounts of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines upon TCR engagement [7,8], are exceptionally abundant in the liver compared with other organs. These lymphocytes are localized in both the sinusoid and space of Disse [5,9] (Figure 1). Among the cell types, Kupffer, NK, and invariant NKT cells are hematopoietic cells, whereas the other cell types are non-hematopoietic cells.
In mice, two different types of precursor cells differentiate into macrophages [10–12]. One is derived from the yolk sac and the other from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Macrophages develop in the yolk sac in the early embryonic stage. In the later stage, HSCs appear in the aorta-gonad-mesonephros region and migrate to the fetal liver, where they expand and differentiate into various cell types, including macrophages. Recently, Kupffer cells were verified to be derived from the yolk sac, not HSCs . The difference in cell lineages might reflect the features of the two types of macrophages. Conventional HSC-derived hematopoietic cells such as T cells, B cells, and macrophages are radiosensitive, whereas Kupffer cells are radioresistant . It is noteworthy that regular bone marrow transfer cannot reconstitute Kupffer cells. If host mice sequentially receive irradiation and then transplantation of donor bone marrow cells, T cells, B cells, and many other hematopoietic cell types, but not Kupffer cells, are thoroughly reconstituted with donor-derived cells . For successful reconstitution of Kupffer cells, ablation of Kupffer cells prior to host irradiation is required [14,15].
In this paper, we review the importance of Kupffer cells in the development of acute liver injuries with various etiologies, particularly focusing on recent findings in mice.
2. Endotoxin-Induced Liver Injury
Mice are somewhat resistant to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a cell wall component of gram-negative bacteria. The 50% lethal dose (LD50) of LPS in non-treated naive mice is approximately 50 mg/kg. However, systemic administration of heat-killed Propionibacterium acnes (previously named Corynebacterium parvum), an indigenous bacterium in skin, render mice highly susceptible to LPS [16,17]. The LD50 of LPS in P. acnes-primed mice is <50 μg/kg. The morbidity and mortality of P. acnes-primed mice after challenge with a subclinical dose of LPS were demonstrated. After the LPS challenge, the P. acnes-primed mice developed proinflammatory cytokinemia, systemic hypercoagulation, and hypothermia, followed by a high mortality . All these signs were observed in severe septic patients [19,20]. The surviving mice developed acute liver injury later [21,22]. In contrast, the non-treated naive mice displayed none of the symptoms and signs after challenge with the same LPS dose. Thus, systemic treatment with heat-killed P. acnes prominently enhanced the sensitivity of the mice to LPS. The mechanisms underlying the P. acnes-induced sensitization to LPS and the morbidity and mortality after the subsequent LPS challenge differed. Therefore, we will introduce each mechanism separately.
2.1. P. acnes Induction of LPS Sensitization
Treatment of mice with heat-killed P. acnes induced the formation of dense granulomas in the liver that largely consisted of F4/80+ macrophages [21,23]. To address the mechanism of this hepatic granuloma formation, we investigated which cells ingested heat-killed P. acnes via fluorescence labeling of the bacteria. We found that labeled bacteria were promptly ingested predominantly by F4/80+ Kupffer cells in the liver but by F4/80− cells in the spleen [22,23]. Intriguingly, hepatic granulomas grew and expanded around the P. acnes-phagocytized Kupffer cells , prompting us to propose the possibility that Kupffer cells are necessary for the development of hepatic granulomas. To test this, we depleted Kupffer cells by intravenous injection of clodronate liposome, which selectively eliminates macrophages, including Kupffer cells and dendritic cells . Mice pretreated with clodronate liposome, which we designated as “Kupffer cell-ablated mice”, did not exhibit hepatic granuloma formation after treatment with heat-killed P. acnes. Furthermore, in contrast to Kupffer cell-sufficient mice, the Kupffer cell-ablated mice remained resistant to LPS-induced mortality and liver injury, even after receiving heat-killed P. acnes [18,23]. Thus, Kupffer cells, and/or presumably other clodronate liposome-sensitive cells, are primarily required for P. acnes-induced LPS sensitization, both systemically and locally, via the induction of hepatic granuloma formation.
Myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) is a common adapter molecule for the signal pathways mediated by Toll-like receptor (TLR) family members, with the exception of TLR3 . TLRs are innate immune signal receptors that sense extracellular and endosomal, but not cytoplasmic, danger molecules. As they cannot invade the cytosol of cells after being ingested by Kupffer cells, heat-killed P. acnes is thought to be recognized by extracellular/endosomal sensor TLRs. Therefore, it is plausible that Myd88−/− mice do not develop hepatic granulomas after P. acnes treatment [23,25]. Indeed, mice deficient in TLR9, which utilizes MyD88 for signaling, are somewhat resistant to P. acnes-induced hepatic granulomatous changes , suggesting the importance of TLR9-MyD88 pathway for the development of P. acnes-induced hepatic granuloma formation. The TLR/MyD88-mediated pathway activates nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) to induce gene expression of various molecules, including interleukin (IL) 12. It is conceivable that the introduction of NF-κB decoy oligodeoxynucleotides in the liver protects against P. acnes-induced hepatic granuloma formation, and the resultant morbidity and mortality, after subsequent challenge with a subclinical dose of LPS . Il12−/− mice are also resistant to P. acnes treatment in terms of hepatic granuloma formation and the acquisition of LPS sensitization [18,28]. As IL-12 is a potent interferon (IFN)-γ-inducing factor, IFN-γ expression seems to also be involved in this phenomenon. Indeed, Ifn-γ−/− mice do not show these host responses to P. acnes at all [18,29]. Furthermore, P. acnes treatment renders wild-type mice highly susceptible to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF), in terms of morbidity and mortality, similar to P. acnes/LPS-induced illness . Intriguingly, P. acnes-induced sensitization to TNF also depends on IL-12 and IFN-γ expression . Collectively, the TLR-MyD88-IL-12-IFN-γ axis is required for the development of P. acnes-induced hepatic granuloma formation and the resultant sensitization to LPS and TNF (Figure 2).
2.2. LPS-Induced Liver Injury
The importance of IL-18 for the development of P. acnes/LPS-induced liver injury was reported soon after the identification of IL-18 as a potent IFN-γ-inducing factor . Administration of neutralizing anti-IL-18 antibodies just before LPS treatment rescued P. acnes-primed mice from the liver injury induced by LPS challenge. Consistently, P. acnes-primed Il18−/− mice were resistant to LPS-induced liver injury concomitant with the impairment in IFN-γ induction. This suggests that IL-18, like IL-12, is also involved in the P. acnes induction of LPS sensitization by inducing IFN-γ expression. However, in contrast with Il12−/− mice, Il18−/− mice exhibit normal susceptibility to P. acnes treatment in terms of hepatic granuloma development and LPS hypersensitiveness .
IL-18 is a member of the IL-1 family and is produced as a biologically inactive precursor [30,31]. Cleavage of precursor IL-18 is required for its activation and secretion. Caspase (Casp)-1 is the primary intracellular enzyme that processes precursor IL-18 and IL-1β into their mature forms . Casp1−/− mice, which were demonstrated strictly to be Casp1−/−Casp11−/− mice owing to the caspase-11 deficiency in their ancestor embryonic stem cells , display the same phenotype as that seen in Il18−/− mice . Caspase-1 is also produced as a biologically inactive zymogen. Caspase-1 activation occurs in association with the inflammasome, a cytoplasmic, large, protein complex formed after cell activation with the appropriate stimuli . Inflammasomes can be separated into at least four types, distinguished by the use of different cytoplasmic sensors, namely NACHT, leucine-rich repeat (LRR), and pyrin domain-containing protein (NLRP)-1; NLRP3; NACHT, LRR, and caspase recruitment domain (CARD) domain-containing protein (NLRC)-4; and absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2). Three of the four sensors, namely NLRP1, NLRP3, and NLRC4, belong to the NOD-like receptor (NLR) family, and AIM2 is a DNA sensor outside the NLR family [34,35]. We verified that the NLRP3 inflammasome is required for caspase-1 activation in Kupffer cells following stimulation with LPS . Kupffer cells that lack NLRP3 or the gene encoding apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a carboxy-terminal CARD (ASC), an adaptor molecule of caspase-1 activation , cannot exhibit caspase-1 activation or IL-18/IL-1β maturation upon LPS stimulation. TLR4, a cell surface receptor for LPS, is critical for LPS-induced caspase-1 activation . Furthermore, LPS-activated TLR4-mediated caspase-1 activation is mediated by Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β (TRIF), but not MyD88, in Kupffer cells . Thus, upon TLR4 engagement, TRIF-mediated signaling activates the NLRP3 inflammasome to release biologically active IL-18 and IL-1β, at least from Kupffer cells (Figure 3). However, the molecular process that links the TLR4/TRIF signal to the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is not fully understood.
Intriguingly, IL-18 cannot directly kill hepatocytes. Primary cultured hepatocytes do not show necrotic or apoptotic cell death after incubation with recombinant IL-18 (rIL-18). How does IL-18 contribute to P. acnes/LPS-induced liver cell death? IL-18 has the capacity to induce molecules that can in turn induce hepatocyte cell death. IL-18 can induce Fas ligand (FasL) expression in Natural killer (NK) cells . As hepatocytes constitutively express Fas, a potent cell death signal receptor , the contribution of IL-18 to liver injury via induction of FasL becomes conceivable. Furthermore, IL-18 is capable of inducing TNF, another powerful hepatocytocidal cytokine , both directly and indirectly [21,40,41]. Thus, after LPS challenge, the release of IL-18 via activation of the TLR4/TRIF-NLRP3 inflammasome axis is important for the development of liver injury via induction of hepatocytocidal factors (Figure 3).
2.3. IL-18 Induction of FasL Accelerates the Development of Liver Injury
Macrophages do not express Fas in the resting state. However, liver macrophages from P. acnes-primed mice express Fas molecules on their surfaces. As shown previously, FasL-expressing cells can kill Fas-expressing hepatocytes, but not hepatic macrophages, although the mechanism is poorly defined [38,42,43]. Upon FasL stimulation, Fas-expressing macrophages release mature IL-18 and IL-1β [42,43]. This suggests that Fas-mediated signaling might activate inflammasomes. However, the FasL-induced release of IL-18 and IL-1β does not require caspase-1, NLRP3, or NLRC4 [42,43]. Very recently, caspase-8, but not caspase-1, caspase-9, or caspase-11, was demonstrated to be critical for Fas-mediated IL-18 maturation [44,45]. As mentioned above, IL-18 can induce FasL expression by NK cells . This strongly suggests that the IL-18-induced expression of FasL might promote liver injury via the acceleration of the release of abundant amounts of mature IL-18. In fact, administration of rFasL- or FasL-expressing NK cells caused acute liver injury concomitant with elevated serum levels of IL-18 in P. acnes-primed mice, but not in naive mice . Furthermore, intravenous injection of rIL-18 caused liver injury, partly dependent on endogenous Fas/FasL signaling, in P. acnes-primed mice . Thus, IL-18 can accelerate the release of mature IL-18 via the induction of FasL expression and activation of Fas-mediated caspase-8 signaling. Once IL-18 is released, the “IL-18 booster circuit” could burst, which could eventually result in the explosive expansion of the liver injury [21,42] (Figure 3).
3. Hypercoagulation-Associated Acute Severe Hepatitis
Most of the proteins involved in the procoagulant and anticoagulant pathways are synthesized in the liver, which may imply that patients with liver injuries undergo changes in their hemostatic system that make them susceptible to coagulopathy-prone conditions . However, we now know that patients with chronic liver injuries exemplified by liver cirrhosis show “rebalanced hemostatic status” due to a reduction in both procoagulant and anticoagulant mechanisms or rather a predisposition to the hypercoagulability state [47–49]. Very recently, hemostatic alterations in acute liver failure were demonstrated to be similar to those in chronic liver diseases [50–52]. This is also the case for mouse models of acute liver failure such as those induced by concanavalin A (Con A) and acetaminophen (APAP) administration. In both models, hypercoagulability contributes to the development of severe liver failure, but through different cellular and molecular mechanisms.
3.1. Con A-Induced Acute Liver Injury
Con A is a jack bean-derived lectin with powerful T-cell mitogenic activity. Intravenous injection of Con A induces acute liver failure in mice . It has been well established that T cells, particularly CD4+ cells, play an essential role in the development of Con A-induced hepatitis . Considering that neutralization or gene depletion of IFN-γ or TNF prevents mice from developing Con A hepatitis, IFN-γ and TNF were believed to serve as critical initiators of inflammation in this type of liver injury. Recently, we clearly demonstrated that IFN-γ and TNF were responsible for Con A hepatitis; however, this occurred by the induction of intrasinusoidal prothrombosis. Microthrombi consisting of red blood cells, platelets, and fibrin deposits were observed under electron microscopy of the liver of Con A-challenged mice . Inhibition of the coagulation cascade can potently rescue mice from Con A hepatitis without impairment in the induction of IFN-γ and TNF . Very recently, we identified the cellular and molecular mechanisms for the development of Con A-induced acute prothrombotic liver failure .
3.1.1. Importance of IFN-γ/STAT1 in the Development of Procoagulant Hepatitis
Tissue factor (TF) is a primary activator of procoagulant pathways [56–58], which results in fibrin formation and platelet activation (Figure 4). After Con A challenge, massive liver injury develops and is accompanied by dense, intrasinusoidal fibrin deposition  (Figure 5A). Plasma levels of the thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), an excellent indicator of thrombin, are exceptionally elevated, clearly indicating that systemic hypercoagulation develops as well. After Con A challenge, hepatic expression of Ifnγ and Tnf are promptly induced, followed by hepatic induction of Tf (Figure 5B). Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) promotes coagulation by potently inhibiting anticoagulant pathways [59,60] (Figure 4). Like Tf, hepatic Pai1 induction follows Ifnγ and Tnf induction (Figure 5B). Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-1, a transcription factor for IFN-γ signaling, is necessary for the hepatic induction of Tnf and Pai1 (Figure 5C), indicating the importance of IFN-γ/STAT1. Notably, a neutralizing anti-TF monoclonal antibody protects against liver injury and concomitantly inhibits intrasinusoidal fibrin deposition. In sharp contrast, Pai1−/− mice are normally susceptible to Con A hepatitis (Figure 5D). Intriguingly, the neutralization of TF does not affect hepatic Ifnγ induction (Figure 5D), clearly indicating that IFN-γ contributes to Con A hepatitis primarily by initiating TF, but only slightly by activating inflammatory responses. Accordingly, TF, but not PAI-1, is critical for the development of thrombotic liver injury. Thus, IFN-γ-mediated STAT1 signaling induces TF expression, leading to the development of massive prothrombotic liver injury (Figure 5E).
3.1.2. Cellular Mechanisms of Prothrombotic Hepatitis
The sinusoid consists of two types of cells that have the potential to express TF: Kupffer cells and sinusoidal endothelial cells (Figure 1). Compared with control mice, both sinusoidal endothelial cells and Kupffer cells isolated from Con A-treated mice exhibited obvious induction of Tf expression, suggesting that both cell types might contribute to the initiation of the coagulation cascade in the liver (Figure 6A). To clarify the roles of Kupffer cells, we generated Kupffer cell-ablated mice by injecting clodronate liposome, as described earlier . The Kupffer cell-ablated mice showed a reduction in Tf induction and reduced liver injury relative to mice treated with a control PBS liposome, indicating that Kupffer cells are responsible for prothrombotic liver injury via the expression of Tf (Figure 6B). To further examine which cell type, either Kupffer or sinusoidal endothelial cell, is primarily responsible for hepatic microthrombosis, we generated various chimeric mice. Kupffer cell-ablated host mice were regularly irradiated, and then they received donor bone marrow cells. WT mice reconstituted with WT hematopoietic cells showed hepatic Tf induction and developed liver injury after Con A challenge (WT > WT). In contrast, the Stat1−/− mice reconstituted with Stat1−/− hematopoietic cells were resistant to Con A treatment, as seen with the Stat1−/− mice (Stat1−/− > Stat1−/−; Figure 6C). The WT mice reconstituted with Stat1−/− hematopoietic cells (Stat1−/− > WT) and the converse chimera, the Stat1−/− mice reconstituted with WT hematopoietic cells (WT > Stat1−/−), comparably displayed intermediate susceptibility (Figure 6C). Collectively, IFN-γ-STAT1 signaling in both the Kupffer and sinusoidal endothelial cells equally contributed to the liver injury via TF induction (Figure 6D).
3.1.3. Con A, IFN-γ, and TNF Are Necessary and Sufficient for Massive Liver Injury
Rag2−/− mice that lack T and B cells are resistant to Con A-induced hepatitis (Figure 7A), accompanied by the lack of hepatic induction of IFN-γ and TNF. This suggests that T cells might serve as IFN-γ/TNF-producing cells. In fact, simultaneous injection of rIFN-γ and rTNF render Rag2−/− mice susceptible to Con A treatment in terms of hepatic Tf induction and development of massive liver injury (Figure 7A). Furthermore, neutralization of TF completely rescued Rag2−/− mice from the IFN-γ/TNF/Con A-induced liver alterations (Figure 7A).
All the results thus far suggest the following: upon Con A challenge, T cells promptly produce IFN-γ and TNF. In turn, Con A, IFN-γ, and TNF signaling combine to induce TF expression in Kupffer and endothelial cells. The Con A-induced signaling pathway involved in this mechanism has yet to be elucidated. These events hyperactivate the procoagulant pathway to produce intrasinusoidal microthrombi. In addition, both hepatocytes and stellate cells exhibit enhanced TF expression following Con A challenge . These cells are segregated from the sinusoid under normal conditions (Figure 1). However, sinusoidal damage brings even those “hidden” cells in contact with circulating coagulation factors to participate in the further activation of the coagulation cascade. Subsequently, these events result in massive liver injury (Figure 7B). Recently, heparin pretreatment was reported to partly protect against FasL-induced lethal liver injury, presumably via inhibition of intravascular coagulation [39,61]. From these observations and ours, we propose that intrasinusoidal microthrombi with multifoci may contribute to prompt and burst development of liver necrosis in patients with massive liver injury such as that in acute liver failure and/or acute-on-chronic liver failure.
3.2. APAP-Induced Acute Liver Injury
APAP is a commonly used nonprescription analgesic and antipyretic in many developed countries, including Japan. Accidental or intentional overdose with APAP results in lethal liver injury with hypercoagulability . The APAP metabolite is directly toxic to hepatocytes . Recently, inflammatory and hypercoagulability responses following the initial hepatocyte damage induced by the APAP metabolite were demonstrated to be critical for the lethal exacerbation of APAP-induced liver injury.
3.2.1. Hypercoagulability in APAP-Induced Hepatotoxicity
Administration of a toxic dose of APAP induced lethal hepatitis in mice. It is well established that APAP induces hepatic inflammation and liver cell damage . The mechanism of the development of APAP-induced hepatic inflammation was unclear. However, recently, the following mechanism was clearly demonstrated. APAP treatment induces hepatocyte cell death by the direct action of the APAP metabolite, resulting in liberation of dead cell-derived free DNA. This DNA in turn induces inflammatory responses that produce precursor IL-1β and IL-18 in sinusoidal endothelial cells via TLR9 activation. In parallel, the NLRP3 inflammasome is activated and then it secretes mature IL-18 and IL-1β, although the agonist(s) involved in the NLRP3 inflammasome activation is unknown. Il18−/− mice are somewhat resistant to APAP-induced mortality . Treatment with neutralizing IL-1β antibody or TLR9 antagonists significantly rescues mice from APAP-induced lethality . Thus, APAP induces hepatic inflammation via the activation of innate signal receptors sensing extracellular and intracellular molecules in host cells. In addition to hepatic inflammation, coagulation disorder has been demonstrated to be involved in APAP-induced liver injuries . After APAP challenge, mice exhibit substantial fibrin deposition in their livers. Plasma TAT levels were elevated, followed by an increase in plasma PAI-1 levels, suggesting both local and systemic hypercoagulability. Heparin treatment protected against liver injury. Furthermore, Tf−/−TF transgenic mice, cells of which constitutively express fixed low levels of human TF but lack the capability to express endogenous murine TF, are resistant to APAP-induced liver injury . More recently, hepatocytes were reported to be a major cellular source of TF in the liver . They reported that primary cultured murine hepatocytes expressed TF on their surface even under normal conditions. Furthermore, hepatocytes isolated from WT mice have the potential to exert procoagulant activity in vitro. In contrast, hepatocytes isolated from liver-specific TF conditional knockout mice lack this capacity. Notably, intravenous injection of normal hepatocytes, but not those from the hepatocyte-specific TF-deficient mice, induced plasma TAT elevation . Thus, hepatocytes themselves are capable of activating the coagulation cascade by expressing TF. Intriguingly, the mutant mice developed liver injury in the limited early phase after APAP treatment, as did the WT mice. This is perhaps due to the direct, hepatocytocidal action of the APAP-derived toxic metabolite. Therefore, it is plausible that during liver damage induced by the APAP-derived hepatocytotoxin, the injured hepatocytes might trigger the activation of the procoagulation system by contact with the procoagulant factors in the circulation. Under normal conditions, however, hepatocytes cannot activate the coagulation cascade because of their localization apart from the sinusoid (Figure 1). From this, we may assume that under poor anticoagulable conditions, liver damage by itself has a predisposition to trigger hypercoagulability irrespective of the mechanism by which liver damage is induced.
3.2.2. Kupffer Cells Play a Beneficial Role
As mentioned previously, Kupffer cells play a critical role in the P. acnes-induction of LPS sensitization and Con A-induced severe hepatitis by activating hepatic granuloma formation and inducing TF expression, respectively (Figures 2 and 6). In contrast to those models of acute liver injuries, Kupffer cells have been reported to negatively regulate APAP-induced acute liver injury. The liver injury in Kupffer cell-ablated mice was more severe than that in Kupffer cell-sufficient control mice [67–69]. Kupffer cells play several protective roles. After APAP challenge, various anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-13, and IL-10 are produced, as well as proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-18 [64,70]. Kupffer cell-ablated mice displayed impaired induction of IL-10 and IL-18-binding protein (BP) following APAP treatment . As the IL-18 BP serves as a natural antagonist of IL-18 with a higher affinity for IL-18 than the affinity of IL-18 receptor (IL-18R) for IL-18 , reduction of IL-18 binding protein (IL-18 BP) induction might conceivably result in the development of more severe liver injury . Il10−/− mice are highly susceptible to APAP-induced liver injury , suggesting that Kupffer cells might negatively regulate inflammation by producing IL-10 as well. In addition to the production of anti-inflammatory molecules, Kupffer cells are capable of repairing liver injury. Kupffer cells isolated from APAP-treated mice expressed significantly higher levels of angiogenesis-associated molecules than those from untreated mice. In fact, upon APAP treatment, Kupffer cell-ablated mice showed prolonged vascular leakage in their livers when compared with Kupffer cell-sufficient normal mice [68,69]. Thus, Kupffer cells play a beneficial role in APAP-induced liver injury by producing anti-inflammatory molecules and pro-angiogenic factors.
From the previous reports, we may assume the following scenario for APAP-induced liver injury: the APAP metabolite rapidly and directly induces hepatocyte cell death, followed by the induction of inflammatory responses via the activation of TLR9 and the NLRP3 inflammasome. Dead hepatocytes and the resultant hepatic inflammation might disrupt the sinusoidal structure, eventually resulting in the exposure of TF-expressing hepatocytes to the blood flow, leading to the production of intrasinusoidal microthrombi. Kupffer cells negatively regulate liver injury by producing anti-inflammatory cytokines and repair-initiating pro-angiogenic molecules. Collectively, these events might converge on the development of acute liver failure.
Kupffer cells show pathological and beneficial actions in the context of different pathogenic processes via the activation of the different machineries they possess. Recent studies have revealed a complicated network among these various systems, such as innate/acquired immunities, metabolic pathways, wound-healing mechanisms, and procoagulant/anticoagulant systems. These systems were previously believed to be regulated independently from one another. We are now beginning to unravel the complicated relationships among them. In the near future, we will have developed the tools to prevent and/or treat intractable liver diseases that may result from these complicated networks involving multiple biological systems.
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (grant NO. 25461016 and 25461016) and partly by the Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (2012–2015) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Author ContributionsT.H. designed and wrote the manuscript. S.N. wrote the manuscript partly.
- Schnabl, B.; Brenner, D.A. Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and liver diseases. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 1513–1524. [Google Scholar]
- Meijer, C.; Wiezer, M.J.; Diehl, A.M.; Young, S.-Q.; Schouten, H.J.; Meijer, S.; van Rooijen, N.; van Lambalgen, A.A.; Dijkstra, C.D.; van Leeuwen, P.A.M. Kupffer cell depletion by Cl2 MDP-liposomes alters hepatic cytokine expression and delays liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. Liver 2000, 20, 66–77. [Google Scholar]
- Seki, E.; Tsutsui, H.; Iimuro, Y.; Naka, T.; Son, G.; Akira, S.; Kishimoto, T.; Nakanishi, K.; Fujimoto, J. Contribution of Toll-like receptor/Myeloid differentiation factor 88 signaling to murine liver regeneration. Hepatology 2005, 41, 443–450. [Google Scholar]
- Tanuma, Y.; Ito, T. Electron microscope study on the hepatic sinusoidal wall and fat-storeing cells in the bat. Arch. Histol. Jpn 1978, 41, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
- Kaneda, K.; Wake, K. Distribution and morphological characteristics of the pit cells in the liver of the rat. Cell Tissue Res 1983, 233, 485–498. [Google Scholar]
- Kaneda, K.; Kurioka, N.; Seki, S.; Wake, K.; Yamamoto, S. Pit cell-hepatocyte contact in autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 1984, 4, 955–958. [Google Scholar]
- Matsui, K.; Yoshimoto, T.; Tsutsui, H.; Hyodo, Y.; Hayashi, N.; Hiroishi, K.; Kawada, N.; Okamura, H.; Nakanishi, K.; Higashino, K. Propionibacterium acnes treatment diminishes CD4+ NK1.1+ T cells but induces type I T cells in the liver by induction of IL-12 and IL-18 production from Kupffer cells. J. Immunol 1997, 159, 97–106. [Google Scholar]
- Yoshimoto, T.; Paul, W.E. CD4pos, NK1.1pos T cells promptly produce interleukin 4 in response to in vivo challenge with anti-CD3. J. Exp. Med 1994, 179, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar]
- Santodomingo-Garzon, T.; Swaine, M.G. Role of NKT cells in atuoimmune liver disease. Autoimmun. Rev 2011, 10, 793–800. [Google Scholar]
- Orkin, S.H.; Zon, L.I. Hematopoiesis: An evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell 2008, 132, 631–644. [Google Scholar]
- Cumano, A.; Godin, I. Ontogeny of the hematopietic system. Annu. Rev. Immunol 2007, 25, 745–785. [Google Scholar]
- Hoeffel, G.; Wang, Y.; Greter, M.; See, P.; Teo, P.; Malleret, B.; Leboeuf, M.; Low, D.; Oller, G.; Almeida, F. Adult Langerhans cells derive predominantly from embryonic fetal liver monocytes with a minor contribution of yolk sac-derived macrophages. J. Exp. Med 2012, 209, 1167–1181. [Google Scholar]
- Schulz, C.; Gomez Perdiguero, E.; Chorro, L.; Szabo-Rogers, H.; Cagnard, N.; Kierdorf, K.; Prinz, M.; Wu, B.; Jacobsen, S.E.W.; Pollard, J.W. A lineage of myeloid cells independent of Myb and hematopoietic stem cells. Science 2012, 336, 86–90. [Google Scholar]
- Seki, E.; de Minicis, S.; Österreicher, C.H.; Kluwe, J.; Osawa, Y.; Brenner, D.A.; Schwabe, R.F. TLR4 enhances TGF-β signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat. Med 2007, 13, 1324–1332. [Google Scholar]
- Van Rooijen, N.; Sanders, A. Kupffer cell depletionh by liposome-delivered drugs: Comparative activity of intracellular clodronate, propamidine and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Hepatology 1996, 23, 1239–1243. [Google Scholar]
- Feruga, J.; Allison, A.C. Role of mononuclear infiltrating cells in pathogenesis of hepatitis. Lancet 1978, 312, 610–611. [Google Scholar]
- Mizoguchi, Y.; Tsutsui, H.; Sakagami, Y.; Kuboi, H.; Seki, S.; Kobayashi, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Morisawa, S. The protective effects of prostaglandin E1 in an experimental massive hepatic necrosis model. Hepatology 1987, 7, 1184–1188. [Google Scholar]
- Kawa, K.; Tsutsui, H.; Uchiyama, R.; Kato, J.; Matsui, K.; Iwakura, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Nakanishi, K. IFN-γ is a master regulator of endotoxin shock syndrome in mice primed with heat-killed Propionibacterium acnes. Int. Immunol 2010, 22, 157–166. [Google Scholar]
- Levi, M. Disseminated intravascular coagulation: What’s new? Crit. Care Clin 2005, 21, 449–467. [Google Scholar]
- Levi, M.; Ten Cate, H. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. N. Engl. J. Med 1999, 341, 586–592. [Google Scholar]
- Tsutsui, H.; Matsui, K.; Okamura, H.; Nakanishi, K. Pathophysiological roles of interleukin-18 for inflammatory liver diseases. Immunol. Rev 2000, 174, 192–209. [Google Scholar]
- Tsutsui, H.; Imamura, M.; Fujimoto, J.; Nakanishi, K. The TLR4/TRIF-mediated activation of NLRP3 inflammasome underlies endotoxin-induced liver injury in mice. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract 2010, 2010, 641865. [Google Scholar]
- Imamura, M.; Tsutsui, H.; Yasuda, K.; Uchiyama, R.; Yumikura-Futatsugi, S.; Mitani, K.; Hayashi, S.; Akira, S.; Taniguchi, S.-I.; van Rooijen, N. Contribution of TIR domain-containing adapter inducing IFN-β-mediated IL-18 release to LPS-induced liver injury in mice. J. Hepatol 2009, 51, 333–341. [Google Scholar]
- Akira, S.; Uematsu, S.; Takeuchi, O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 2006, 124, 783–801. [Google Scholar]
- Velayudham, A.; Hritz, I.; Dolganiuc, A.; Mandrekar, P.; Kurt-Jones, E.; Szabo, G. Critical role of Toll-like receptors and the common TLR adaptor, MyD88, in induction of granulomas and liver injury. J. Hepatol 2006, 45, 813–824. [Google Scholar]
- Kalis, C.; Gumenscheimer, M.; Freudenberg, N.; Tchaptchet, S.; Fejer, G.; Heit, A.; Akira, S.; Galanos, C.; Freudenberg, M.A. Requirement for TLR9 in the immunomodulatory activity of Propionibacterium acnes. J. Immunol 2005, 174, 4295–4300. [Google Scholar]
- Ogushi, I.; Iimuro, Y.; Seki, E.; Son, G.; Hirano, T.; Hada, T.; Tsutsui, H.; Nakanishi, K.; Morishita, R.; Kaneda, Y.; et al. Nuclear factor κB decoy oligodeoxynucleotides prevent endotoxin-induced fatal liver failure in a murine model. Hepatology 2003, 38, 335–344. [Google Scholar]
- Sakao, Y.; Takeda, K.; Tsutsui, H.; Kaisho, T.; Nomura, F.; Okamura, H.; Nakanishi, K.; Akira, S. IL-18-deficient mice are resistant to endotoxin-induced liver injury but highly susceptible to endotoxin shock. Int. Immunol 1999, 11, 471–480. [Google Scholar]
- Tsuji, H.; Mukaida, N.; Harada, A.; Kaneko, S.; Matsushita, E.; Nakanuma, Y.; Tsutsui, H.; Okamura, H.; Nakanishi, K.; Tagawa, Y.-I.; et al. Alleviation of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute liver injury in Propionibacterium acnes-primed IFN-γ-deficient mice by a concomitant reduction of TNF-α, IL-12, and IL-18 production. J. Immunol 1999, 162, 1049–1055. [Google Scholar]
- Okamura, H.; Tsutsui, H.; Komatsu, T.; Yutsudo, M.; Hakura, A.; Tanimoto, T.; Torigoe, K.; Okura, T.; Nukada, Y.; Hattori, K.; et al. Cloning of a new cytokine that induces IFN-γ production by T cells. Nature 1995, 378, 88–91. [Google Scholar]
- Seki, E.; Tsutsui, H.; Nakano, H.; Tsuji, N.M.; Hoshino, K.; Adachi, O.; Adachi, K.; Futatsugi, S.; Kuida, K.; Takeuchi, O.; et al. LPS-induced IL-18 secretion from murine Kupffer cells independently of MyD88 that is critically involved in induction of production of IL-12 and IL-1β. J. Immunol 2001, 166, 2651–2657. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, Y.; Kuida, K.; Tsutsui, H.; Ku, G.; Hsiao, K.; Fleming, M.A.; Hayashi, N.; Higashino, K.; Okamura, H.; Nakanishi, K.; et al. Activation of interferon-γ inducing factor mediated by interleukin-1β converting enzyme. Science 1997, 275, 206–209. [Google Scholar]
- Kayagaki, N.; Warming, S.; Lamkanfi, M.; Cande Walle, L.; Louie, S.; Dong, J.; Newton, K.; Qu, Y.; Liu, J.; Heldens, S.; et al. Non-canonical inflammasome activation targets caspase-11. Nature 2011, 479, 117–121. [Google Scholar]
- Tschopp, J.; Martinon, F.; Burns, K. NALPs: A novel protein family involved in inflammation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2003, 4, 95–104. [Google Scholar]
- Henao-Mejia, J.; Elinav, E.; Thaiss, C.A.; Flavell, R.A. Inflammasomes and metabolic disease. Annu. Rev. Physiol 2014, 76, 57–78. [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto, M.; Yaginuma, K.; Tsutsui, H.; Sagara, J.; Guan, X.; Seki, E.; Yasuda, K.; Yamamoto, M.; Akira, S.; Nakanishi, K. ASC is essential for LPS-induced activation of procaspase-1 independently of TLR-associated signal adapter molecules. Gene. Cells 2004, 9, 1055–1067. [Google Scholar]
- Tsutsui, H.; Nakanishi, K.; Matsui, K.; Higashino, K.; Okamura, H.; Miyazawa, Y.; Kaneda, K. Interferon-γ-inducing factor up-regulates Fas ligand-mediated cytotoxic activity of murine natural killer cell clones. J. Immunol 1996, 157, 3967–3973. [Google Scholar]
- Ogasawara, J.; Watanabe-Fukunaga, R.; Adachi, M.; Matsuzawa, A.; Kasuga, T.; Kitamura, Y.; Itoh, N.; Suda, T.; Nagata, S. Lethal effect of the anti-Fas antibody in mice. Nature 1993, 364, 806–809. [Google Scholar]
- Malhi, H.; Gores, G.J.; Lemasters, J.J. Apoptosis and necrosis in the liver: A tale of two deaths? Hepatology 2006, 43, S31–S44. [Google Scholar]
- Nakanishi, K.; Yoshimoto, T.; Tsutsui, H.; Okamura, H. Interleukin-18 regulates both Th1 and Th2 responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol 2001, 19, 423–474. [Google Scholar]
- Tsutsui, H.; Matsui, K.; Kawada, N.; Hyodo, Y.; Hayashi, N.; Okamura, H.; Higashino, K.; Nakanishi, K. IL-18 accounts for both TNF-α- and Fas ligand-mediated hepatotoxic pathways in endotoxin-induced liver injury in mice. J. Immunol 1997, 159, 3961–3967. [Google Scholar]
- Tsutsui, H.; Kayagaki, N.; Kuida, K.; Nakano, H.; Hayashi, N.; Takeda, K.; Matsui, K.; Kashiwamura, S.; Hada, T.; Akira, S.; et al. Caspase-1-independent, Fas/Fas ligand-mediated IL-18 secretion from macrophages causes acute liver injury in mice. Immunity 1999, 11, 359–367. [Google Scholar]
- Miwa, K.; Asano, M.; Horai, R.; Iwakura, Y.; Nagata, S.; Suda, T. Caspase-1-independent IL-1b release and inflammation induced by the apoptosis inducer Fas ligand. Nat. Med 1998, 4, 1287–1292. [Google Scholar]
- Bossaller, L.; Chiang, P.-I.; Schmidt-Lauber, C.; Ganesan, S.; Kaiser, W.J.; Rathinam, V.A.; Mocarski, E.S.; Subramanian, D.; Green, D.R.; Silverman, N.; et al. Fas (CD95) mediates noncanonical IL-1b and IL-18 maturation via caspase-8 in an RIP3-independent manner. J. Immunol 2012, 189, 5508–5512. [Google Scholar]
- Uchiyama, R.; Yonehara, S.; Tsutsui, H. Fas-mediated inflammatory response in Listeria monocytogenes infection. J. Immunol 2013, 190, 4245–4254. [Google Scholar]
- Lisman, T.; Leebeek, F.W.G.; de Groot, P.G. Haemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease. J. Hepatol 2002, 37, 280–287. [Google Scholar]
- Tripodi, A.; Salerno, F.; Chantarangkul, V.; Clerici, M.; Cazzaniga, M.; Primignani, M.; Mannuccio, M.P. Evidence of normal thrombin generation in cirrhosis despite abnormal conventional coagulation tests. Hepatology 2005, 41, 553–558. [Google Scholar]
- Gatt, A.; Riddell, A.; Calvaruso, V.; Tuddenham, E.G.; Makris, M.; Burroughs, A.K. Enhanced thrombin generation in patients with cirrhosis-induced coagulopathy. J. Thromb. Haemost 2010, 8, 1994–2000. [Google Scholar]
- Lisman, T.; Porte, R.J. Rebalanced hemostasis in patients with liver disease: Evidence and clinical consequences. Blood 2010, 116, 878–885. [Google Scholar]
- Stravitz, R.T.; Lisman, T.; Luketic, V.A.; Sterling, R.K.; Puri, P.; Fuchs, M.; Ibrahim, A.; Lee, W.M.; Sanyal, A.J. Minimal effects of acute liver injury/acute liver failure on hemostasis as assessed by thromboelastrography. J. Hepatol 2012, 56, 129–136. [Google Scholar]
- Lisman, T.; Bakhtiari, K.; Adelmeijer, J.; Meijers, J.C.M.; Porte, R.J.; Stravitz, T. Intact thrombin generation and decreased fibrinolytic capacity in patients with acute liver injury or acute liver failure. J. Thromb. Haemost 2012, 10, 1312–1319. [Google Scholar]
- Hugenholtz, G.G.G.; Adelmeijer, J.; Meijers, J.C.M.; Porte, R.J.; Stravitz, R.T.; Lisman, T. An unbalance between von Willebrand factor and ADAMS13 in acute liver failure: Implications for hemostasis and clinical outcome. Hepatology 2012, 58, 752–761. [Google Scholar]
- Tiegs, G.; Hentschel, J.; Wendel, A. A T cell-dependent experimental liver injury in mice inducible by concanavalin A. J. Clin. Investig 1992, 90, 196–203. [Google Scholar]
- Miyazawa, Y.; Tsutsui, H.; Mizuhara, H.; Fujiwara, H.; Kaneda, K. Involvement of intrasinusoidal hemostasis in the development of Concanavalin A-induced hepatic injury in mice. Hepatology 1997, 27, 497–506. [Google Scholar]
- Kato, J.; Okamoto, T.; Motoyama, H.; Uchiyama, R.; Kirchhofer, D.; van Rooijen, N.; Enomoto, H.; Nishiguchi, S.; Kawada, N.; Fujimoto, J. Interferon-γ-mediated tissue factor expression contributes to T-cell-mediated hepatitis through induction of hypercoagulation in mice. Hepatology 2013, 57, 362–372. [Google Scholar]
- Mackman, N. The many faces of tissue factor. J. Thromb. Haemost 2009, 7 Suppl 1, 136–139. [Google Scholar]
- Belting, M.; Ahamed, J.; Ruf, W. Signaling of the tissue factor coagulation pathway in angiogenesis and cancer. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 2005, 25, 1545–1550. [Google Scholar]
- Mackman, N. Role of tissue factor in hemostasis, thrombosis, and vascular development. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 2004, 24, 1015–1022. [Google Scholar]
- Van der Poll, T.; Büller, H.R.; ten Cate, H.; Wortel, C.H.; Bauer, K.A.; van Deventer, S.J.H.; Hack, C.E.; Sauerwein, H.P.; Rosenberg, R.D.; ten Cate, J.W. Activation of coagulation after administration of tumor necrosis factor to normal subjects. N. Engl. J. Med 1990, 322, 1622–1627. [Google Scholar]
- Sawdey, M.S.; Loskutoff, D.J. Regulation of murine type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor gene expression in vivo. J. Clin. Investig. 1991, 88, 1346–1353. [Google Scholar]
- Weerasinghe, S.V.W.; Moons, D.S.; Altshuler, P.J.; Shah, Y.M.; Bishr Omary, M. Fibrinogen-γ proteolysis and solubility dinamics during apoptotic mouse liver injury: Heparin prevents and treats liver damage. Hepatology 2011, 53, 1323–1332. [Google Scholar]
- Larson, A.M.; Polson, J.; Fontana, R.J.; Davern, T.J.; Lalani, E.; Hynan, L.S.; Reisch, J.S.; Schiødt, F.V.; Ostapowicz, G.; Shakil, A.O. Acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure: Results of a united states multicenter, prospective study. Hepatology 2005, 42, 1364–1372. [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, J.D.; Pumford, N.R.; Samokyszyn, V.M.; Hinson, J.A. Mechanism of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity: Covalent binding versus oxidative stress. Chem. Res. Toxicol 1996, 9, 580–585. [Google Scholar]
- Imaeda, A.B.; Watanabe, A.; Sohail, M.A.; Mahmood, S.; Mohamadnejad, M.; Sutterwala, F.S.; Flavell, R.A.; Mehal, W.Z. Acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice is dependent on Tlr9 and the Nalp3 inflammasome. J. Clin. Investig 2009, 119, 305–314. [Google Scholar]
- Ganey, P.E.; Luyendyk, J.P.; Newport, S.W.; Eagle, T.M.; Maddox, J.F.; Mackman, N.; Roth, R.A. Role of the coagulation system in acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Hepatology 2007, 46, 1177–1186. [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan, B.P.; Kopec, A.K.; Joshi, N.; Brown, J.A.; Bishop, S.C.; Kassel, K.M.; Rockwell, C.; Mackman, N.; Luyendyk, J.P. Hepatocyte tissue factor activates the coagulation cascade in mice. Blood 2013, 121, 1868–1874. [Google Scholar]
- Ju, C.; Reilly, T.P.; Bourdi, M.; Radonovich, M.F.; Brady, J.N.; George, J.W.; Pohl, L.R. Protective role of Kupffer cells in acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury in mice. Chem. Res. Toxicol 2002, 15, 1504–1513. [Google Scholar]
- Holt, M.P.; Yin, H.; Ju, C. Exacerbation of acetaminophen-induced disturbances of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in the absence of Kupffer cells in mice. Toxicol. Lett 2010, 194, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
- You, Q.; Holt, M.; Yin, H.; Li, G.; Hu, C.-J.; Ju, C. Role of hepatic resident and infiltrating macrophages in liver repair after acute injury. Biochem. Pharmacol 2013, 86, 836–843. [Google Scholar]
- Bourdi, M.; Masubuchi, Y.; Relly, T.P.; Amouzadeh, H.R.; Martin, J.L.; George, J.W.; Shah, A.G.; Pohl, L.R. Protection against acetaminophen-induced liver injury and lethality by interleukin-10: Role of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Hepatology 2002, 35, 289–298. [Google Scholar]
- Novick, D.; Kim, S.H.; Fantuzzi, G.; Reznikov, L.L.; Dinarello, C.A.; Rubinstein, M. Interleukin-18 binding protein: A novel modulator of the Th1 cytokine response. Immunity 1999, 10, 127–136. [Google Scholar]
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).