Next Article in Journal
Next Article in Special Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Previous Article in Special Issue

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(3), 4837-4855; doi:10.3390/ijms15034837

Review
The Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor: Its Intracellular Signaling and Regulation
Yue Yin 1, Yin Li 1 and Weizhen Zhang 1,2,*
1
Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China; E-Mails: bingningxingwan@sina.com (Y.Y.); yinli@bjmu.edu.cn (Y.L.)
2
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0346, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: weizhenz@umich.edu or weizhenzhang@bjmu.edu.cn; Tel.: +1-734-615-0360; Fax: +1-734-763-4135.
Received: 28 January 2014; in revised form: 6 March 2014 / Accepted: 11 March 2014 /
Published: 19 March 2014

Abstract

: The growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR), also known as the ghrelin receptor, is involved in mediating a wide variety of biological effects of ghrelin, including: stimulation of growth hormone release, increase of food intake and body weight, modulation of glucose and lipid metabolism, regulation of gastrointestinal motility and secretion, protection of neuronal and cardiovascular cells, and regulation of immune function. Dependent on the tissues and cells, activation of GHSR may trigger a diversity of signaling mechanisms and subsequent distinct physiological responses. Distinct regulation of GHSR occurs at levels of transcription, receptor interaction and internalization. Here we review the current understanding on the intracellular signaling pathways of GHSR and its modulation. An overview of the molecular structure of GHSR is presented first, followed by the discussion on its signaling mechanisms. Finally, potential mechanisms regulating GHSR are reviewed.
Keywords:
ghrelin receptor; constitutive activity; intracellular signaling; [Ca2+]i; AMPK; mTOR; MAPK; PI3K

1. Introduction

Growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR), also known as ghrelin receptor, was first identified as the target of the growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) and subsequently cloned in human pituitary and hypothalamus [1]. It is a heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) containing 366 amino acids with the typical seven transmembrane domains (TMI-VII). Both the peptidyl (GHRP-6) and nonpeptide (MK-0677) growth hormone secretagogues stimulate growth hormone release through activation of this specific GPCR expressed on the surface of somatotroph in the anterior pituitary gland [24]. Its endogenous ligand was identified a few years later from stomach extracts and named ghrelin when Kojima et al. used the Chinese hamster ovary cell line expressing the rat GHSR to screen various tissue preparations for the characteristic increase in intracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca2+]i) induced by the GHSs [5].

To date, the physiological functions of GHSR have been extended to include: (1) the release of various hormones such as growth hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol, and prolactin [6]; (2) modulation of food intake and energy metabolism [7]; (3) influences on glucose and lipid metabolism [6]; (4) regulation of gastrointestinal motility and secretion [8], and pancreatic function [9]; (5) regulation of cell proliferation and survival [10,11]; (6) attenuation of proinflammatory cascades and regulation of immune function that play important roles in aging and gastrointestinal homeostasis [4]; and (7) cell protection in the nervous and the cardiovascular systems [1214]. Such diversified functions of GHSR suggest the complexity of GHSR-mediated intracellular signaling. Numerous intracellular signaling pathways have been proposed upon activation of GHSR. This review summarizes recent advances concerning the intracellular signaling mechanisms of GHSR with a focus on its functional relevance. We will first introduce the molecular structure of GHSR, then discuss in detail its key intracellular signaling mechanisms, and finish with the current understanding on the modulation of GHSR. Although two isoforms of GHSR: 1a and 1b, have been identified, GHSR1a, which is traditionally considered as the active form of GHSR, is the focus of much investigation; we therefore focus our discussion on the GHSR1a.

2. Molecular Structure of GHSR

Located on chromosome 3q26.2, the GHSR gene encodes two transcripts: 1a and 1b. The GHSR1a is encoded by a 1.1 kb noncontiguous open reading frame, which is divided into exon 1 and exon 2 encoding an amino-terminal TM I–V segment and a carboxyl-terminal TM VI/VII segment respectively by an approximate 2 kb of noncoding intron [2,15]. The intron contains a stop codon that may lead to the production of GHSR1b mRNA by alternative splicing. Both sequences are identical from the Met translation site to Leu265. Over 90% of sequence homology has been found between the predicted human, rat, pig, and sheep GHSR1a amino acid sequences [16]. Human GHSR1a consists of 366 amino acids with a molecular mass of approximate 41 kDa [1]. As a member of GPCRs, GHSR1a contains seven transmembrane α-helix hydrophobic domains connected by three intra- and extracellular domains, beginning with an extracellular N-terminal domain and ending with an intracellular C-terminal domain [17]. The N-terminal domain forms a β-hairpin structure, while the TM domains form a round calyx-like structure with the Pro residues in the center of the TM helices. Among seven TM domains, TM III occupies the central position, while TM V is the most peripheral [18]. TM II and TM III are considered the ligand activation domains. Three conserved residues, Glu140-Arg141-Tyr142, located at the intracellular end of TM III are critical for the isomerization between the active and inactive conformation. Two conserved cysteine residues (Cys116 and Cys198) on extracellular loops 1 and 2 form a disulfide bond [19,20]. These key amino acid residues, which have been evolutionarily conserved for 400 million years, are essential for binding and activation of GHSR1a by different ligands, highlighting their importance in the physiological processes [16]. GHSR1b contains 298 amino acids corresponding to the first five TM domains encoded by exon 1, plus a unique 24 amino acid tail encoded by an alternatively spliced intronic sequence [2]. GHSR1b neither binds nor responds to ghrelin or GHSs [21]. However, GHSR1b gene is comprehensively expressed in various tissues [22]. It is therefore reasonable to assume that this receptor possesses some unidentified biological functions. Indeed, GHSR1b decreases the cell surface expression of GHSR1a and acts as a repressor of the constitutive activity of GHSR1a when overexpressed in HEK-293 cells [23]. This finding indicates that GHSR1b may act as an endogenous modulator for GHSR1a constitutive activity.

Ligand binding stabilizes the active conformation of GHSR1a. The main binding pocket is deep in the cavity created by the TM domains. Both endogenous and non-endogenous ligand binding causes a conformational change in GHRS1a molecular structure characterized by a reciprocal rearrangement of the α-helices with vertical seesaw movements of TM VI and TM VII around their central proline residues. This alteration renders the intracellular ends of TM VI and TM VII to move away from the center of the receptor toward TM III, exposing the sites subsequently recognized by G-proteins and β-arrestin. The binding domain for the ghrelin is composed of six amino acids located in TM III, TM VI, and TM VII [24]. Ligand interaction with one pocket formed by polar amino acids in TM II/TM III and another formed by nonpolar amino acids in TM V/TM VI is required for binding of ghrelin with GHSR1a [18]. In contrast, the inverse agonist d-Arg1-d-Phe5-d-Trp7,9-Leu11-substance P requires a wider binding pocket, which is dispersed across the main binding crevice [19]. Studies using both peptidyl ligand GHRP-6 and nonpeptidyl ligand MK-0677 reveal Glu124 in the TM III domain as one of the key amino acids in the electrostatic interaction of ligand with GHSR1a [25]. Substitution of Gln for Glu124 in human GHSR1a eliminates its function, while mutation of Arg283 in TM VI disrupts its interaction with Glu124, and therefore abolishes both constitutive and agonist-induced signaling [26]. Disruption of the disulfide bond between Cys116 and Cys198 in the extracellular portion of GHSR1a completely abolishes the activity of all agonists [16,25]. The Glu187 residue in the second extracellular loop is also critical for ghrelin binding and activation of GHSR1a. Glu187 to Ala mutant (E187A) decreases ghrelin- and GHRP6-evoked intracellular calcium responses relative to that in the wild-type receptor [27].

Genetic analysis indicates that missense mutation of GHSR1a is associated with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) and idiopathic short stature (ISS) in distinct ethnic groups such as Europeans [28], Brazilian [29] and Japanese [30]. Substitution of 611 site nucleotide from C to A, which results in protein level change in amino acid 204 from alanine to glutamate (p.A204E), has been found in patients with IGHD and ISS in France and Morocco [28]. Interestingly, presence of p.A204E appears to be accountable for the detrimental consequence in these patients and their siblings because an additional p.A204E allele correlates with a higher degree of short stature [28]. For Brazilians, Ser84Ile and Val182Ala have been identified in ISS children including a subgroup of constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) patients [29]. For Japanese, ΔGln36, Pro108Leu, Cys173Arg, and Asp246Ala mutations are identified in patients diagnosed with either IGHD or ISS [30]. Most of these mutations lead to significant reductions in cell-surface expression and constitutive activity of the GHSR1a. In vitro experiments using transiently transfected HEK293 cells demonstrate that the Ala204Glu mutation reduces membrane distribution, and impairs constitutive activity of GHSR1a without affecting ligand-binding activity [28]. Similar reductions in cell-surface levels and constitutive activity of GHSR1a have been observed for Ser84Ile and Val182Ala mutations [29]. Other mechanisms involve decrease in binding affinity to ghrelin and impaired agonist- and inverse agonist-stimulated receptor signaling for Pro108Leu and Asp246Ala mutations respectively [30]. All these studies indicate the clinical relevance of GHSR1a missense mutations with defects of growth hormone and subsequent delay of growth and puberty.

3. GHSR1a-Induced Intracellular Signaling and Functional Relevance

Upon binding with ghrelin, GHSR1a undergoes a profound change in the transmembrane α helices, which alters the conformation of the intracellular loops and facilitates its interaction with G-proteins. The interaction causes the exchange of GDP bound to the G protein α subunit for GTP, which activates G protein subunits and initiates various signaling responses via a series of intracellular molecules.

3.1. [Ca2+]i Signaling

The well characterized signal transduction mechanism employed by the GHSR1a is the signaling pathway which leads to the hallmark increase in [Ca2+]i. Two mechanisms have been reported to mediate the GHSR1a-induced [Ca2+]i signaling: the dominant phospholipase C (PLC)/inositol (1,4,5) triphosphate (IP3) signaling pathway and the debated protein kinase A (PKA)/cAMP pathway. Ligand binding activates the GHSR1a, induces the dissociation of the Gαq/11-subunit which subsequently stimulates the production of PLC. PLC cleaves the membrane lipid phosphoinositol 4,5 diphosphate (PtdIns (4,5) P2) into IP3 and diacylglycerol (DAG). IP3 binds with IP3 receptor to trigger the release of calcium from stores inside the endoplasmic reticulum, which contributes to the initial rise in [Ca2+]i. DAG activates the protein kinase C (PKC) which inhibits potassium channels leading to membrane depolarization, subsequent opening of voltage-gated calcium channels and extracellular calcium influx [31]. In addition to this typical Gαq/11/PLC/IP3 pathway, ghrelin may also evoke the intracellular calcium signaling by an alternate pathway. In neuropeptide Y (NPY)-containing neurons, the ghrelin-induced increase in intracellular calcium concentration is dependent on calcium influx through the N-type calcium channel. These channels are activated by the cAMP-PKA signaling pathway following the coupling of the Gαs protein to the GHSR1a [32]. Consistent with these reports, studies on adenosine, once considered as a potential ligand for the GHSR1a, also suggest that GHSR1a may respond through the Gαs/cAMP/PKA signaling mechanism. Adenosine increases levels of [Ca2+]i independent of the concentration of IP3. Pretreatment with the Gαs subunit activator cholera toxin (CTX), the adenylate cyclase inhibitor MDL-12,330 A, or the PKA inhibitor H-89 blocks the effect of adenosine on GHSR1a-induced [Ca2+]i signaling [33]. However, other studies raise questions on the Gαs/cAMP/PKA signaling pathway employed by GHSR1a. Ghrelin alone, the endogenous ligand for GHSR1a, shows no effect on the increase in intracellular cAMP levels [30]. Conflicting results have been reported even for the original observation suggesting that ghrelin may potentiate GHRH-induced increase in cAMP. In cells co-transfected with GHSR1a and GHRH receptor, inhibition of PLC and PKC demonstrates no effect on ghrelin potentiation of the GHRH-induced cAMP increase [34,35]. The Gαs/cAMP/PKA signaling pathway employed by GHSR1a therefore remains under debate.

The most characterized physiological function employed by GHSR1a-induced [Ca2+]i signaling relates to the stimulation of growth hormone release. In pituitary cells, both non-endogenous and endogenous GHSR1a agonists stimulate growth hormone release in a [Ca2+]i dependent manner. GHSR1a-induced increase in [Ca2+]i may trigger the release of neurotransmitters/hormones and gene expression. In the arcuate nucleus, GHSR1a induces [Ca2+]i signaling in NPY neurons [32]. Instead, [Ca2+]i signaling employed by GHSR1a has been reported to either stimulate or attenuate insulin release in the isolated pancreatic islet cells [9,36].

3.2. AMP Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Signaling

AMPK may mediate the effect of ghrelin/GHSR1a on the regulation of energy metabolism. In the peripheral tissues, GHSR1a mediated activation of AMPK activity regulates fat distribution and metabolism in a tissue-specific manner [37]. In the rat liver, ghrelin inhibits AMPK activity to increase triglyceride content by evoking lipogenic and glucogenic related gene expression without changing the mitochondrial oxidative enzyme activities. In contrast, ghrelin reduces triglyceride content in gastrocnemius muscle by increasing mitochondrial oxidative enzyme activities through an AMPK-independent mechanism [38]. Thus, GHSR1a may induce tissue-specific changes in intracellular signaling pathways to differentially regulate mitochondrial and lipid metabolism gene expression in order to favor triglyceride deposition in liver over skeletal muscle. In the hypothalamus, ghrelin sustains NPY/AgRP neuron firing through an AMPK-dependent presynaptic mechanism [39]. This action increases food intake and thus contributes to the maintenance of neutral energy balance.

AMPK is also proposed as the critical mediator for the protective effect of ghrelin on cardiomyocytes, neurons and hepatocytes. In both the rat heart injury model induced by isoproterenol (ISO) and the tunicamycin (Tm) or dithiothreitol (DTT) evoked endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) models, ghrelin has been shown to protect cardiomyocytes against injury and apoptosis through a GHSR1a/CaMKK/AMPK signaling pathway [40]. In Parkinson’s disease, ghrelin enhances dopaminergic survival via AMPK mediated increase in removal of damaged mitochondria (mitophagy) which ultimately enhances mitochondrial bioenergetics [41]. While AMPK activation has been proposed to protect cells by regulating mitochondrial biogenesis and reducing reactive oxygen species production, several observations from our laboratory suggest that GHSR1a/AMPK may not be the sole pathway involved in ghrelin-induced protection of hepatocellular injury. In the mouse hepatic injury model induced by ischemia/reperfusion, ghrelin markedly attenuates up-regulation of AMPKα phosphorylation. On the other hand, ghrelin receptor gene knockout mice demonstrate a significantly higher level of hepatic AMPKα phosphorylation induced by ischemia/reperfusion injury relative to the wild-type littermates. In addition, exogenous ghrelin significantly reduces the phosphorylation of hepatic AMPKα in mice fed a high-fat diet [42].

3.3. PI3K/AKT Signaling

Activation of GHSR1a by ghrelin modulates insulin receptor substrate (IRS-1) associated PI3K activity and Akt phosphorylation. In hepatoma cells, ghrelin increases IRS-1 associated PI3K activity while inhibits Akt kinase activity. Alteration of PI3K/AKT signaling increases gluconeogenesis by reversing the down-regulation of insulin on phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) mRNA expression, a rate-limiting enzyme of gluconeogenesis that catalyzes the conversion of oxaloacetate to phosphoenolpyruvate [43].

Ghrelin also stimulates the GHSR1a-dependent IRS-1 associated PI3K/Akt signaling in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Inhibition of PI3K activity blocks the effects of ghrelin on the proliferation and apoptosis of these cells. Furthermore, ghrelin increases both basal and insulin-stimulated glucose transport through the GHSR1a/PI3K/Akt signaling in 3T3-L1 cells. Blockade of PI3K signaling by LY294002 completely attenuates the effect of ghrelin on glucose transport [10].

As an important player in the regulation of cardiovascular functions, ghrelin has been reported to promote vascular endothelial cell proliferation, migration, survival and angiogenesis, and to inhibit cell apoptosis [13,44,45]. The underlying mechanisms may involve GHSR1a mediated activation of MAPK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways, although a GHSR1a-independent mechanism may not be fully excluded.

3.4. mTOR Signaling

As an orexigenic hormone from gastric X/A like endocrine cells, ghrelin has been proposed to exercise its effects by activating the GHSR1a in the central nervous system. While multiple signaling mechanisms have been reported to be involved in the neuronal response to ghrelin, mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is worth noting. Central administration of ghrelin induces a marked up-regulation of the mTOR signaling in the hypothalamic and dorsal vagal neurons, both of which are critical in the regulation of energy metabolism. In addition, central inhibition of mTOR signaling with rapamycin significantly decreases the orexigenic effect induced by ghrelin and normalizes the up-regulation of AgRP and NPY mRNA, as well as their key downstream transcription factors: cAMP response-element binding protein (CREB) and forkhead box O1 [46]. Chronic peripheral administration of ghrelin significantly increases body weight, fat mass and food efficiency in wild-type and S6K2-knockout but not in S6K1-knockout mice [47]. These observations provide the most convincing evidence that ghrelin regulates organism energy metabolism by the central nervous system involving the mTOR/S6K1 signaling pathway.

The molecular link between the GHSR1a and mTOR signaling remains to be determined. AMPK has long been considered as a negative up-stream regulator of mTOR signaling and may therefore serve as a potential molecule bridging the GHSR1a and mTOR signaling [48]. However, current observations do not fully support this notion. Both AMPK and mTOR activities are up-regulated by ghrelin in the hypothalamic neurons. These observations contradict the classical view on the negative regulation of mTOR activity by AMPK [46]. However, other studies have shown that ghrelin increases phosphorylation of hypothalamic AMPK, while it reduces phosphorylation of mTOR [49]. Given the complexity of hypothalamic networks in the maintenance of energy balance, it is not surprising that hypothalamic neurons may act differentially in response to GHSR1a activation depending on the organism energy status.

3.5. MAPK Signaling

In addition to the signaling pathways described above, ghrelin also regulates the proliferation and differentiation through MAP kinase (MAPK) signaling in a wide variety of cell types ranging from adrenal gland cells, myocytes, adipocytes to osteoblasts. Activation of GHSR1a stimulates the proliferation of human and rat adrenal zona glomerulosa cells through a mechanism involving tyrosine kinase-dependent MAPK p42/p44 signaling [11]. In preadipocytes, exposure to ghrelin causes a rapid activation of MAPKs, especially ERK1/2. Inhibition of MAPK signaling by PD98059, an ERK inhibitor, significantly attenuates the mitogenic and anti-apoptotic activities of ghrelin in these cells [10]. In human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), ghrelin induces cardiomyocyte differentiation from hESCs via activation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway [50].

Multiple signaling pathways may be involved in GHSR1a associated MAPK activation. In preadipocytes, pretreatment of cells with a Gαi/o inhibitor (pertussis toxin), PKC inhibitors (staurosporine and GF109203X), or a PI3K inhibitor (wortmannin) significantly attenuates ghrelin-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation. In hepatoma cells expressing GHSR1a, ghrelin stimulates the MAPK signaling pathway characterized by Tyr phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) and binding of growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (GRB2) to IRS-1, an upstream signaling molecule of MAPK [43].

4. Modulation of GHSR1a

Numerous studies suggest that both endogenous and synthetic agonists of GHSR1a could rapidly down-regulate its own receptor expression, suggesting the existence of a feedback regulation [5153]. Injection of rat GH3 pituitary tumor cells into female Wistar-Furth rats significantly increases levels of growth hormone, which is followed by a significantly lower level of GHSR1a mRNA in the pituitary [52]. In dw/dw dwarf rats with growth hormone deficiency, the expression of GHSR1a is markedly increased in the hypothalamus, while administration of bovine growth hormone reverses this stimulation [53]. These findings suggest the presence of an intricate regulatory network governing the GHSR1a and highlight the importance of the mechanism involved in the regulation of GHSR1a in the physiological functions of ghrelin such as metabolic homeostasis, aging, immune modulation, and integration of complex physiological systems.

The regulation of GHSR1a responsiveness potentially involves molecular events governing receptor signaling, expression, desensitization, receptor interaction, and constitutive activity. These mechanisms as they pertain to ghrelin and GHSR1a are currently under active investigation.

4.1. Regulation of GHSR1a Expression

It is well characterized that both mRNA and protein expressions of GHSR1a are significantly down-regulated when the receptors are continuously exposed to either endogenous or synthetic agonists. These observations suggest a dynamic change in the GHSR1a expression which is subjected to the regulation of transcriptional factors and hormones.

4.1.1. Regulation by Transcriptional Factors

The 5-flanking regions of the GHSR1a gene are structurally similar and conserved among species. It contains a TATA-less, CpG island promoter. Analysis of the 5-flanking regions in different species predicts numerous transcription factor binding sites including bHLH, AP2, and the POU-domain transcription factors Pit-1, Oct-1, and Ptx-1 which are involved in pituitary-specific expression. Amongst these transcriptional factors, Pit-1, a pituitary specific transcriptional factor, is well-characterized. A putative consensus biding site for Pit-1 has been revealed in the 5′-untranslated region of GHSR1a gene [54]. Promoter activity analysis also confirms Pit-1 as an important transcriptional factor in the regulation of GHSR1a expression. In a series of experiments in which the GHRS1a promoter region is inserted into a vector containing bacterial luciferase, significant expression is observed in rat pituitary cells, but not in other cell lines such as COS7 monkey kidney cells, human endometrium Skut-1B cells, mouse hypothalamic LHRH neuronal GT1–7 cells, and mouse corticotroph pituitary AtT20 cells. These results suggest a cell specific expression of GHSR1a. Further experiments demonstrate that Pit-1 significantly increases the luciferase activity in the monkey kidney COS7 cells, suggesting that GHSR1a gene expression is controlled by its binding with Pit-1 [15]. In addition, GHRH stimulates the expression of GHSR1a mRNA by increasing the Pit-1 level [51,55]. Studies by Soto et al. (1995) provide elegant evidence demonstrating an increase in transcription of Pit-1 in cultured rat pituitary cells treated with GHRH [56]. However, it is worth noting that a single dose of GHRH, which is sufficient to induce maximal release of growth hormone in porcine somatotrophs, reduces levels of GHSR1a mRNA by half [57]. Reasons accounting for these conflicting observations are currently unknown.

Other possible binding sites for bHLH and AP2 transcription factors have been proposed to be involved in the regulation of GHSR basal activity [54].

4.1.2. Regulation by Hormones

Expression of GHSR1a is also under the control of hormones. In cultured rat pituitary cells, both β-estradiol and triiodothyronine increase levels of GHSR1a mRNA [15]. Further experiments using an RNA synthesis inhibitor and examination of mRNA decay rates demonstrate that the thyroid hormone up-regulates levels of GHSR1a mRNA by increasing the stability of the GHSR1a transcript [58]. In contrast, hydrocortisone decreases levels of GHSR1a mRNA by inhibiting GHSR1a gene promoter activity [59]. Growth hormone significantly increases levels of GHSR1a mRNA in the arcuate (ARC) and ventromedial nuclei (VMN), and hippocampal CA1 and CA2 neurons of GH-deficient dwarf rats. Administration of growth hormone reduces levels of GHSR1a to significantly below normal in ARC and VMN, suggesting a possible mechanism for feedback regulation of GHSR1a [53]. Katayama et al. (2000) confirms a similar increase in levels of GHSR1a mRNA in the pituitary gland derived from growth hormone-deficient rats [60]. Ghrelin itself also reduces the expression of GHSR1a in somatotrophs by 62% relative to controls [57].

4.2. Desensitization of GHSR1a

Desensitization is a consequence of a combination of the uncoupling of the receptor from heterotrimeric G-proteins and the internalization of cell surface receptors to intracellular compartments. Receptor desensitization provides a mechanism for protecting cells against receptor overstimulation and is commonly observed in GPCR including GHSR1a. Deficiencies in the receptor desensitization system may result in an uncontrolled or defective stimulation of target cells with consequent physiological changes. Since dissociation of the GPCR receptor from heterotrimeric G-proteins has been extensively reviewed in the literature, we focus our discussion on the internalization of GHSR1a.

The dynamics of GHSR1a internalization has been evaluated by two different assays: imaging using confocal microscopy in CHO cells stably expressing the human GHSR1a tagged at its C terminus with EGFP, and radioligand binding in HEK-293 cells stably expressing the human GHSR1a. Kinetic studies demonstrate that GHSR1a is internalized by endocytosis in a time-dependent manner with a peak at approximately 20 min after ligand stimulation. Internalized GHSR1a is sorted into endosomes and recycled back to the cytoplasmic membrane. The EGFP-labeled GHSR1a co-localizes with the early endosomal protein 1, an endosome marker, but not with cathepsin, a lysosomal marker. Once the ghrelin–GHSR1a complex is internalized into intracellular vesicles, GHSR1a is sorted into endosomes to be recycled back to the membrane. About 360 min after agonist removal, levels of GHSR1a on the cell surface recover almost 100%. This process is prevented by inhibitors of endosomal acidification: NH4Cl and concanamycin, but is not affected by inhibition of protein biosynthesis, suggesting that GHSR1a is replenished from endosomes rather than de novo synthesis [61]. Functional studies also support the concept of ghrelin receptor recycling. Growth hormone response to two consecutive pulses of ghrelin is significantly attenuated when pulses are separated by a short interval of 60 min, whereas growth hormone response retains its initial amplitude when the second pulse is administered after 180, 240, or 360 min [62].

GHSR1a internalization to recycling compartments depends on its C-terminal motifs and constitutive activity. Basal endocytosis of GHSR1a which is critical for its constitutive activity occurs without significant phosphorylation. Experiments using cultured cells over-expressing a dominant-negative β-arrestin 1 fragment (319–418) or cells derived from β-arrestin 1/2 double gene knockout mice demonstrate no alteration in basal GHSR1a endocytosis, suggesting that β-arrestin does not affect basal GHSR1a internalization. In contrast, agonist-induced internalization of GHSR1a is determined by the receptor phosphorylation and subsequent recruitment of β-arrestin proteins. Levels of GHSR1a phosphorylation are relatively low under basal conditions but significantly enhanced after ghrelin treatment. The phosphorylation site appears to be located in the C-terminal motif of the GHSR1a. Replacement of this domain with the GPR39 receptor C terminus markedly increases both basal and ghrelin-induced phosphorylation of GHSR1a relative to the wild-type receptor. β-Arrestin association desensitizes G protein-mediated signaling but also targets GHSR1a for clathrin-mediated endocytosis. This concept is supported by the observation that GHSR1a recruits the clathrin adaptor, arrestin 2, which is tagged with green fluorescent protein to allow for trafficking to endosomes after ghrelin stimulation [63].

GHSR1a internalization is also influenced by lipid and plasma membrane composition. Oligounsaturated fatty acids (OFAs) have been demonstrated to disrupt plasma membrane structure, rendering the membrane more fluid. Exposure of cells expressing GHSR1a to OFAs such as oleic and linoleic acids for a prolonged period significantly increases receptor sensitivity to ghrelin by reducing the internalization of GHSR1a [64]. On the other hand, the inhibitory effects of ghrelin pretreatment on subsequent ghrelin responsiveness are markedly blunted, suggesting that OFAs suppress desensitization of GHSR1a. All these studies indicate that the membrane composition affects GHSR1a activation and desensitization.

4.3. Receptor Interaction

Existence of functional GHSR1a homodimers or heterodimers has been supported by in vitro studies on the receptor trafficking and cellular signaling, and in one investigation by physiological experiments. Interaction between GHSR1a and other GPCRs has been extensively studied in the pituitary cells, neurons and cell lines.

Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer methods, GHSR1a homodimers have been detected in both cytoplasm membranes and endoplasmic reticulum. Presence of sufficient GHSR1a homodimers on the cell surface may ensure the maximal responses to agonist stimulation. Instead, GHS-R1a/GHS-R1b heterodimers are concentrated within the endoplasmic reticulum. This finding suggests that GHSR1b traps GHSR1a within the endoplasmic reticulum by the process of oligomerization [65].

In the pituitary cells, numerous studies suggest that GHSR1a interacts with the GHRH receptor to enhance GHRH-induced cAMP signaling and its subsequent growth hormone release [21]. Amplification of GHRH-induced cAMP accumulation by ghrelin in the pituitary cells requires a mechanism involving GHSR1a-mediated activation of PKC [34,35]. This interaction is further validated by experiments in HEK293 cells co-transfected with GHSR1a and GHRH receptors. Ghrelin markedly increases GHRH-induced cAMP accumulation in these cells. Pretreatment with PKC inhibitor blocks the synergistic effect.

Other interactions include the adenosine receptor. Adenosine induced [Ca2+]i signaling is only observed in cells transfected with GHSR1a, but not in native cells. These results suggest a potential interaction between GHSR1a and the adenosine receptor. Such an interaction appears to occur at the intracellular signaling levels. Further experiments reveal that adenosine signals through adenosine receptor 2b to potentiate the GHSR1a-mediated [Ca2+]i signaling by a mechanism involving Gαs/cAMP/PKA mediated phosphorylation and its subsequent activation of IP3 receptors [33,66].

In the hypothalamic neurons, heterodimerization of GHSR1a and melanocortin-3 receptors (MC3R) causes mutual signaling interference [67]. GHSR1a significantly increases melanocortin-induced cAMP signaling, while the interaction with MC3R markedly impairs the ghrelin-induced Gαq/11 signaling and the agonist-independent basal Ca2+/calmodulin-induced cAMP-responsive element-binding protein signaling activity of GHSR1a. In addition, the agonist-independent basal signaling activity of GHSR1a can determine the functional signaling of the MC3R in a dimer. These findings indicate that the heterodimeric organization of two GPCRs with preferences for different G-proteins can modulate mutually and oppositely the signaling capacities of both receptors. Further investigation will reveal the importance of GPCRs dimerization in the hypothalamic control of food intake and energy homeostasis.

Formation of heterodimers of GHSR1a and the dopamine receptor has also been reported [14]. The interaction between GHSR1a and dopamine receptor subtype 1 (D1R) is supported by co-immunoprecipitation of these two receptor proteins and by functional studies. Immunoprecipitation of cell lysates from HEK293 cells expressing both GHSR1a and D1R using a GHSR1a antibody demonstrates the formation of GHSR1a/D1R heterodimers in the presence of dopamine and ghrelin. Analysis of intracellular signaling pathways reveals a switch in G-protein coupling of the GHSR1a from Gαq/11 to Gαi/s upon agonist-induced formation of GHSR1a/D1R heterodimers. When activated alone, GHSR1a predominantly couples to Gαq/11, while D1R typically signals through Gαs to activate the adenylate cyclase isozyme 2 (AC2). Upon co-activation by both ghrelin and dopamine, GHSR1a and D1R form a heterodimer that subsequently induces a conformational change in the GHSR1a. This conformational change results in coupling of GHSR1a with Gαi protein, releasing βγ subunits that associate with AC2, thereby amplifying AC2 activity. Consistent with these observations, PTX treatment significantly inhibits ghrelin amplification of dopamine-induced cAMP accumulation.

Dimerization of GHSR1a and D2R has been supported by both Tr-FRET methodology and functional studies [68]. Heterodimers formed at equimolar concentrations of GHSR1a and D2R are detected by Tr-FRET assays using SNAP-GHSR1a and CLIP-tagged D2R. Interestingly, heterodimers of GHSR1a and D2R are detected not only in cultured cells but also in hypothalamic and striatal membrane preparations, suggesting the presence of endogenously formed GHSR1a/D2R heterodimers. Moreover, dopamine-induced mobilization of intracellular calcium correlates with the Tr-FRET signal produced by GHSR1a/D2R heteromers. The formation of GHSR1a/D2R dimers is relevant to the regulation of food intake and energy metabolism. Dopamine has been shown to inhibit food intake by its activation of D2R in the lateral hypothalamus. The anorexic effect of D2R activation can be blocked by either GHSR1a antagonism or gene deletion. Cabergoline, a selective D2R agonist, significantly reduces food intake relative to control animals. However, food intake in GHSR1a gene knockout mice is unaffected by cabergoline. Furthermore, cabergoline-induced anorexia is blocked by a highly selective ghrelin receptor antagonist (JMV2959). All these studies support the concept of physiological relevance of dimerization between GHSR1a and D2R in the hypothalamus to the energy homeostasis.

The 5-HT receptor, a centrally expressed GPCR, is also involved in satiety signaling. Heterodimers between the GHSR1a and the 5-HT2C receptor have been demonstrated. Dimerization of the GHSR1a with the unedited 5-HT2C-INI receptor, but not with the partially edited 5-HT2C-VSV isoform, significantly suppresses the agonist inducing GHSR1a mediated [Ca2+]i mobilization, which is completely restored after blockade of the 5-HT2C receptor [69]. While these results may suggest a potential novel mechanism for fine-tuning GHSR1a receptor-mediated activity via dimerization of the GHSR1a with other GPCRs involved in the regulation of appetite and food reward, it is worth noting that heterodimerization occurred in cultured HEK293A cells does not necessary represent the in vivo condition.

4.4. Constitutive Activity of GHSR1a

Relative to other GPCRs, GHSR1a shows an unusually high constitutive activity. Evidence is emerging that the high basal activity of GHSR1a contributes to downstream signaling and physiological processes.

The constitutive activity of GHSR1a is determined by an aromatic cluster formed by three residues (Phe VI:16, Phe VII:06, and Phe VII:09) on the inner face of the extracellular ends of GHSR1a TM VI and TM VII. It is the formation of the hydrophobic core between TM VI and TM VII that ensures proper docking of the extracellular end of TM VII into TM VI, mimicking agonist activation and stabilizing the receptor in active conformation. Specific residues in the vicinity of this cluster contribute to orchestrate microswitches critical for the activation level in absence of ligand. Amongst these surrounding amino acid residues, Trp VI:13 is crucial for the high constitutive activity of GHSR1a, because it is located in the conserved motif CWxP in the middle of TM VI and functions as a global toggle switch model allowing the inward movement of this domain [19,70,71]. Mutation of this residue (Trp276Ala) significantly impairs the ligand-independent activity. Other surrounding amino acid residues such as Val131 and Ile134 also impact the constitutive signaling of GHSR1a. Mutation of these two residues (Val131Leu and Ile134Met) dramatically increases the basal activity of GHSR1a. In addition, a mutation (Ala204Glu) in the extracellular loop II of the human GHSR1a leads to the restriction of the extracellular loop II segment and the decrease in the constitutive signaling level of GHSR1a [28,72].

Constitutive activity of GHSR1a induces both PLC/IP3/[Ca2+]i and calcium/calmodulin kinase IV (CaMK IV)/cAMP responsive element-binding protein (CREB) signaling pathways. PLC/IP3 signaling is the first specifically associated with the GHSR1a constitutive activity [20,7375]. Activation of PLC and its subsequent IP3 production and [Ca2+]i mobilization are mediated via Gαq/11 protein. Constitutive activity of GHSR1a is also detected by CRE reporter gene assay and serum response element (SRE) luciferase assay [71]. CREB activation is induced through Gαs/Gαi/cAMP/PKA and Gαq/11/Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase IV and protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways [76,77]. Alternatively, GHSR1a-induced SRE activity may partly be transduced by the Gα12/13–Rho pathway [71]. GHSR1a constitutive activity may be dependent on cellular context, although its underlying mechanism remains unknown. In HEK-293 cells, transfection of GHSR1a constitutively stimulates both CRE and SRE activities. However, no constitutive activity is detected in the pituitary cell line RC-4B/C40 [78].

Emerging evidences supports the physiological relevance of GHSR1a constitutive activity in growth hormone release, food intake and neural activation. The association of GHSR1a constitutive activity with PLC/IP3 signaling and subsequent intracellular calcium mobilization in the pituitary cells suggests a potential role in the regulation of growth hormone release. The clinical finding of missense GHSR1a mutation (Ala204Glu) in Moroccan patients supports the role of GHSR1a constitutive activity in growth hormone release. Ala204Glu-point mutation, which alters exclusively the GHSR1a constitutive activity measured by POU1F1-luciferase reporter assay, is associated with familial short stature syndrome. Lines of evidence also suggest that GHSR1a constitutive activity plays an important role in the physiological regulation of energy metabolism. Patients expressing an uncharacterized GHSR1a mutation (Phe279Leu) affecting the Phe 279 residue (Phe VI:16), a critical residue for GHSR1a constitutive activity, are characterized by increased obesity and short stature [79]. Absence of GHSR1a constitutive signaling is therefore proposed to cause a syndrome characterized not only by a short stature, but also by obesity [80]. This concept is further confirmed by the observation that intracerebroventricular injection of [d-Arg(1), d-Phe(5), d-Trp(7,9), Leu(11)]-substance P, an inverse agonist for GHSR1a, significantly decreases food intake and body weight likely by reducing gene expressions of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) in the hypothalamus [81]. All these studies indicate that GHSR1a constitutive activity may provide an ultimate novel strategy for the therapy of obesity. New regulatory properties of GHSR1a constitutive activity have also been discovered in ghrelin or GHSR1a gene knockout mice. GHSR1a constitutive activity increases limbic seizures in rodents. GHSR1a knockout mice demonstrate a higher seizure threshold than their wild-type littermates when treated with pilocarpine. Inverse agonism and desensitization/internalization of the GHSR1a attenuate limbic seizures in rats and epileptiform activity in hippocampal slices [82]. Other studies suggest that GHSR1a activity is involved in functional impairment in learning and memory [83], hippocampal-dependent learning and habituated feeding responses [84], and arousal [85]. Further investigations are necessary to determine whether these physiological functions involve GHSR1a constitutive activity.

5. Summary

Studies on the GHSR1a have revealed many fundamentals on its molecular structure, intracellular signaling, constitutive activity, and interaction with other GPCRs. Many of these findings are relevant to the physiological functions of GHSR1a and of interest for translational research. Future opportunities for GHSR1a research are four-fold: (1) to define the mechanism underlying the tissue specific response in GHSR1a-mediated intracellular signaling; (2) to examine the tissue specificity of GHSR1a constitutive activity and ligand-induced response and their physiological relevance; (3) to explore the integrative function of GHSR1a in the intricate regulatory network governing energy metabolism and metabolic homeostasis; (4) to evaluate the potential applications of GHSR1a agonists, antagonists or inverse agonist in the treatment of obesity and its related metabolic diseases.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81030012, 81330010, 81390354) and American Diabetes Association grant #1-13-BS-225.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Howard, A.D.; Feighner, S.D.; Cully, D.F.; Arena, J.P.; Liberator, P.A.; Rosenblum, C.I.; Hamelin, M.; Hreniuk, D.L.; Palyha, O.C.; Anderson, J.; et al. A receptor in pituitary and hypothalamus that functions in growth hormone release. Science 1996, 273, 974–977. [Google Scholar]
  2. McKee, K.K.; Palyha, O.C.; Feighner, S.D.; Hreniuk, D.L.; Tan, C.P.; Phillips, M.S.; Smith, R.G.; van der Ploeg, L.H.; Howard, A.D. Molecular analysis of rat pituitary and hypothalamic growth hormone secretagogue receptors. Mol. Endocrinol. 1997, 11, 415–423. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowers, C.Y. Growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP). Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1998, 54, 1316–1329. [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith, R.G.; Jiang, H.; Sun, Y. Developments in ghrelin biology and potential clinical relevance. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 16, 436–442. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kojima, M.; Hosoda, H.; Date, Y.; Nakazato, M.; Matsuo, H.; Kangawa, K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 1999, 402, 656–660. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hosoda, H.; Kojima, M.; Kangawa, K. Biological physiological and pharmacological aspects of ghrelin. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 100, 398–410. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun, Y.; Wang, P.; Zheng, H.; Smith, R.G. Ghrelin stimulation of growth hormone release and appetite is mediated through the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 4679–4684. [Google Scholar]
  8. Murray, C.D.; Martin, N.M.; Patterson, M.; Taylor, S.A.; Ghatei, M.A.; Kamm, M.A.; Johnston, C.; Bloom, S.R.; Emmanuel, A.V. Ghrelin enhances gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis: A double blind placebo controlled crossover study. Gut 2005, 54, 1693–1698. [Google Scholar]
  9. Date, Y.; Nakazato, M.; Hashiguchi, S.; Dezaki, K.; Mondal, M.S.; Hosoda, H.; Kojima, M.; Kangawa, K.; Arima, T.; Matsuo, H.; et al. Ghrelin is present in pancreatic alpha-cells of humans and rats and stimulates insulin secretion. Diabetes 2002, 51, 124–129. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim, M.S.; Yoon, C.Y.; Jang, P.G.; Park, Y.J.; Shin, C.S.; Park, H.S.; Ryu, J.W.; Pak, Y.K.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, K.U.; et al. The mitogenic and antiapoptotic actions of ghrelin in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Mol. Endocrinol. 2004, 18, 2291–2301. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mazzocchi, G.; Neri, G.; Rucinski, M.; Rebuffat, P.; Spinazzi, R.; Malendowicz, L.K.; Nussdorfer, G.G. Ghrelin enhances the growth of cultured human adrenal zona glomerulosa cells by exerting MAPK-mediated proliferogenic and antiapoptotic effects. Peptides 2004, 25, 1269–1277. [Google Scholar]
  12. Beiras-Fernandez, A.; Kreth, S.; Weis, F.; Ledderose, C.; Pottinger, T.; Dieguez, C.; Beiras, A.; Reichart, B. Altered myocardial expression of ghrelin and its receptor (GHSR-1a) in patients with severe heart failure. Peptides 2010, 31, 2222–2228. [Google Scholar]
  13. Baldanzi, G.; Filigheddu, N.; Cutrupi, S.; Catapano, F.; Bonissoni, S.; Fubini, A.; Malan, D.; Baj, G.; Granata, R.; Broglio, F.; et al. Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin inhibit cell death in cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells through ERK1/2 and PI 3-kinase/AKT. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 159, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang, H.; Betancourt, L.; Smith, R.G. Ghrelin amplifies dopamine signaling by cross talk involving formation of growth hormone secretagogue receptor/dopamine receptor subtype 1 heterodimers. Mol. Endocrinol. 2006, 20, 1772–1785. [Google Scholar]
  15. Petersenn, S.; Rasch, A.C.; Penshorn, M.; Beil, F.U.; Schulte, H.M. Genomic structure and transcriptional regulation of the human growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Endocrinology 2001, 142, 2649–2459. [Google Scholar]
  16. Palyha, O.C.; Feighner, S.D.; Tan, C.P.; McKee, K.K.; Hreniuk, D.L.; Gao, Y.D.; Schleim, K.D.; Yang, L.; Morriello, G.J.; Nargund, R.; et al. Ligand activation domain of human orphan growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) conserved from Pufferfish to humans. Mol. Endocrinol. 2000, 14, 160–169. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bockaert, J.; Pin, J.P. Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: An evolutionary success. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 1723–1729. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pedretti, A.; Villa, M.; Pallavicini, M.; Valoti, E.; Vistoli, G. Construction of human ghrelin receptor (hGHS-R1a) model using a fragmental prediction approach and validation through docking analysis. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3077–3085. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schwartz, T.W.; Frimurer, T.M.; Holst, B.; Rosenkilde, M.M.; Elling, C.E. Molecular mechanism of 7TM receptor activation—A global toggle switch model. Annu. Rev. Pharm. Toxicol. 2006, 46, 481–519. [Google Scholar]
  20. Petersenn, S. Structure and regulation of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Minerva Endocrinol. 2002, 27, 243–256. [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith, R.G.; van der Ploeg, L.H.; Howard, A.D.; Feighner, S.D.; Cheng, K.; Hickey, G.J.; Wyvratt, M.J., Jr; Fisher, M.H.; Nargund, R.P.; Patchett, A.A. Peptidomimetic regulation of growth hormone secretion. Endocr. Rev. 1997, 18, 621–645. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gnanapavan, S.; Kola, B.; Bustin, S.A.; Morris, D.G.; McGee, P.; Fairclough, P.; Bhattacharya, S.; Carpenter, R.; Grossman, A.B.; Korbonits, M. The tissue distribution of the mRNA of ghrelin and subtypes of its receptor GHS-R in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 2988. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chu, K.M.; Chow, K.B.; Leung, P.K.; Lau, P.N.; Chan, C.B.; Cheng, C.H.; Wise, H. Over-expression of the truncated ghrelin receptor polypeptide attenuates the constitutive activation of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C by ghrelin receptors but has no effect on ghrelin-stimulated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 activity. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 39, 752–64. [Google Scholar]
  24. Holst, B.; Lang, M.; Brandt, E.; Bach, A.; Howard, A.; Frimurer, T.M.; Beck-Sickinger, A.; Schwartz, T.W. Ghrelin receptor inverse agonists: Identification of an active peptide core and its interaction epitopes on the receptor. Mol. Pharm. 2006, 70, 936–946. [Google Scholar]
  25. Feighner, S.D.; Howard, A.D.; Prendergast, K.; Palyha, O.C.; Hreniuk, D.L.; Nargund, R.; Underwood, D.; Tata, J.R.; Dean, D.C.; Tan, C.P.; et al. Structural requirements for the activation of the human growth hormone secretagogue receptor by peptide and nonpeptide secretagogues. Mol. Endocrinol. 1998, 12, 137–145. [Google Scholar]
  26. Holst, B.; Cygankiewicz, A.; Jensen, T.H.; Ankersen, M.; Schwartz, T.W. High constitutive signaling of the ghrelin receptor—Identification of a potent inverse agonist. Mol. Endocrinol. 2003, 17, 2201–2210. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ueda, T.; Matsuura, B.; Miyake, T.; Furukawa, S.; Abe, M.; Hiasa, Y.; Onji, M. Mutational analysis of predicted extracellular domains of human growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a. Regul. Pept. 2011, 166, 28–35. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pantel, J.; Legendre, M.; Cabrol, S.; Hilal, L.; Hajaji, Y.; Morisset, S.; Nivot, S.; Vie-Luton, M.P.; Grouselle, D.; de Kerdanet, M.; et al. Loss of constitutive activity of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor in familial short stature. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 760–768. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pugliese-Pires, P.N.; Fortin, J.P.; Arthur, T.; Latronico, A.C.; Mendonca, B.B.; Villares, S.M.; Arnhold, I.J.; Kopin, A.S.; Jorge, A.A. Novel inactivating mutations in the GH secretagogue receptor gene in patients with constitutional delay of growth and puberty. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2011, 165, 233–241. [Google Scholar]
  30. Inoue, H.; Kangawa, N.; Kinouchi, A.; Sakamoto, Y.; Kimura, C.; Horikawa, R.; Shigematsu, Y.; Itakura, M.; Ogata, T.; Fujieda, K. Identification and functional analysis of novel human growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) gene mutations in Japanese subjects with short stature. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, E373–E378. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen, C.; Zhang, J.; Vincent, J.D.; Israel, J.M. Two types of voltage-dependent calcium current in rat somatotrophs are reduced by somatostatin. J. Physiol. 1990, 425, 29–42. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kohno, D.; Gao, H.Z.; Muroya, S.; Kikuyama, S.; Yada, T. Ghrelin directly interacts with neuropeptide-Y-containing neurons in the rat arcuate nucleus: Ca2+ signaling via protein kinase A and N-type channel-dependent mechanisms and cross-talk with leptin and orexin. Diabetes 2003, 52, 948–956. [Google Scholar]
  33. Carreira, M.C.; Camina, J.P.; Smith, R.G.; Casanueva, F.F. Agonist-specific coupling of growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1a to different intracellular signaling systems Role of adenosine. Neuroendocrinology 2004, 79, 13–25. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cheng, K.; Chan, W.W.; Barreto, A., Jr; Convey, E.M.; Smith, R.G. The synergistic effects of His-d-Trp-Ala-Trp-d-Phe-Lys-NH2 on growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor-stimulated GH release and intracellular adenosine 3′5′-monophosphate accumulation in rat primary pituitary cell culture. Endocrinology 1989, 124, 2791–2798. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cheng, K.; Chan, W.W.; Butler, B.; Barreto, A., Jr; Smith, R.G. Evidence for a role of protein kinase-C in His-d-Trp-Ala-Trp-d-Phe-Lys-NH2-induced growth hormone release from rat primary pituitary cells. Endocrinology 1991, 129, 3337–3342. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dezaki, K.; Hosoda, H.; Kakei, M.; Hashiguchi, S.; Watanabe, M.; Kangawa, K.; Yada, T. Endogenous ghrelin in pancreatic islets restricts insulin release by attenuating Ca2+ signaling in beta-cells: Implication in the glycemic control in rodents. Diabetes 2004, 53, 3142–3151. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hardie, D.G. The AMP-activated protein kinase pathway—New players upstream and downstream. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 5479–5487. [Google Scholar]
  38. Barazzoni, R.; Bosutti, A.; Stebel, M.; Cattin, M.R.; Roder, E.; Visintin, L.; Cattin, L.; Biolo, G.; Zanetti, M.; Guarnieri, G. Ghrelin regulates mitochondrial-lipid metabolism gene expression and tissue fat distribution in liver and skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 288, E228–E235. [Google Scholar]
  39. Andrews, Z.B.; Liu, Z.W.; Walllingford, N.; Erion, D.M.; Borok, E.; Friedman, J.M.; Tschop, M.H.; Shanabrough, M.; Cline, G.; Shulman, G.I.; et al. UCP2 mediates ghrelin’s action on NPY/AgRP neurons by lowering free radicals. Nature 2008, 454, 846–851. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, G.G.; Cai, H.Q.; Li, Y.H.; Sui, Y.B.; Zhang, J.S.; Chang, J.R.; Ning, M.; Wu, Y.; Tang, C.S.; Qi, Y.F.; et al. Ghrelin protects heart against ERS-induced injury and apoptosis by activating AMP-activated protein kinase. Peptides 2013, 48, 156–165. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bayliss, J.A.; Andrews, Z.B. Ghrelin is neuroprotective in Parkinson’s disease: Molecular mechanisms of metabolic neuroprotection. Ther. Adv. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 4, 25–36. [Google Scholar]
  42. Qin, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Mulholland, M.; Zhang, W. Ghrelin contributes to protection of hepatocellular injury induced by ischaemia/reperfusion. Liver Int. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Murata, M.; Okimura, Y.; Iida, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Sowa, H.; Kaji, H.; Kojima, M.; Kangawa, K.; Chihara, K. Ghrelin modulates the downstream molecules of insulin signaling in hepatoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 5667–5674. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Zhou, D.; Chen, Y.; Han, L.; Liu, Y.; Cao, C.; Zhao, H.; Liu, G. Ghrelin inhibits apoptosis induced by palmitate in rat aortic endothelial cells. Med. Sci. Monit. 2010, 16, BR396–BR403. [Google Scholar]
  45. Xiang, Y.; Li, Q.; Li, M.; Wang, W.; Cui, C.; Zhang, J. Ghrelin inhibits AGEs-induced apoptosis in human endothelial cells involving ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt pathways. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2011, 29, 149–155. [Google Scholar]
  46. Martins, L.; Fernandez-Mallo, D.; Novelle, M.G.; Vazquez, M.J.; Tena-Sempere, M.; Nogueiras, R.; Lopez, M.; Dieguez, C. Hypothalamic mTOR signaling mediates the orexigenic action of ghrelin. PLoS One 2012, 7, e46923. [Google Scholar]
  47. Stevanovic, D.; Trajkovic, V.; Muller-Luhlhoff, S.; Brandt, E.; Abplanalp, W.; Bumke-Vogt, C.; Liehl, B.; Wiedmer, P.; Janjetovic, K.; Starcevic, V.; et al. Ghrelin-induced food intake and adiposity depend on central mTORC1/S6K1 signaling. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2013, 381, 280–290. [Google Scholar]
  48. Laplante, M.; Sabatini, D.M. mTOR signaling at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122, 3589–3594. [Google Scholar]
  49. Stevanovic, D.; Janjetovic, K.; Misirkic, M.; Vucicevic, L.; Sumarac-Dumanovic, M.; Micic, D.; Starcevic, V.; Trajkovic, V. Intracerebroventricular administration of metformin inhibits ghrelin-induced Hypothalamic AMP-kinase signalling and food intake. Neuroendocrinology 2012, 96, 24–31. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gao, M.; Yang, J.; Wei, R.; Liu, G.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Wang, G.; Gao, H.; Chen, G.; Hong, T. Ghrelin induces cardiac lineage differentiation of human embryonic stem cells through ERK1/2 pathway. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 167, 2724–2733. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kineman, R.D.; Kamegai, J.; Frohman, L.A. Growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) and the GH secretagogue (GHS) L692585 differentially modulate rat pituitary GHS receptor and GHRH receptor messenger ribonucleic acid levels. Endocrinology 1999, 140, 3581–3586. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nass, R.; Gilrain, J.; Anderson, S.; Gaylinn, B.; Dalkin, A.; Day, R.; Peruggia, M.; Thorner, M.O. High plasma growth hormone (GH) levels inhibit expression of GH secretagogue receptor messenger ribonucleic acid levels in the rat pituitary. Endocrinology 2000, 141, 2084–2089. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bennett, P.A.; Thomas, G.B.; Howard, A.D.; Feighner, S.D.; van der Ploeg, L.H.; Smith, R.G.; Robinson, I.C. Hypothalamic growth hormone secretagogue-receptor (GHS-R) expression is regulated by growth hormone in the rat. Endocrinology 1997, 138, 4552–4557. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kaji, H.; Tai, S.; Okimura, Y.; Iguchi, G.; Takahashi, Y.; Abe, H.; Chihara, K. Cloning and characterization of the 5′-flanking region of the human growth hormone secretagogue receptor gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 33885–33888. [Google Scholar]
  55. Yan, M.; Hernandez, M.; Xu, R.; Chen, C. Effect of GHRH and GHRP-2 treatment in vitro on GH secretion and levels of GH pituitary transcription factor-1 GHRH-receptor GH-secretagogue-receptor and somatostatin receptor mRNAs in ovine pituitary cells. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2004, 150, 235–242. [Google Scholar]
  56. Soto, J.L.; Castrillo, J.L.; Dominguez, F.; Dieguez, C. Regulation of the pituitary-specific transcription factor GHF-1/Pit-1 messenger ribonucleic acid levels by growth hormone-secretagogues in rat anterior pituitary cells in monolayer culture. Endocrinology 1995, 136, 3863–3870. [Google Scholar]
  57. Luque, R.M.; Kineman, R.D.; Park, S.; Peng, X.D.; Gracia-Navarro, F.; Castano, J.P.; Malagon, M.M. Homologous and heterologous regulation of pituitary receptors for ghrelin and growth hormone-releasing hormone. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 3182–3189. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kamegai, J.; Tamura, H.; Ishii, S.; Sugihara, H.; Wakabayashi, I. Thyroid hormones regulate pituitary growth hormone secretagogue receptor gene expression. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2001, 13, 275–278. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kaji, H.; Kishimoto, M.; Kirimura, T.; Iguchi, G.; Murata, M.; Yoshioka, S.; Iida, K.; Okimura, Y.; Yoshimoto, Y.; Chihara, K. Hormonal regulation of the human ghrelin receptor gene transcription. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 284, 660–666. [Google Scholar]
  60. Katayama, M.; Nogami, H.; Nishiyama, J.; Kawase, T.; Kawamura, K. Developmentally and regionally regulated expression of growth hormone secretagogue receptor mRNA in rat brain and pituitary gland. Neuroendocrinology 2000, 72, 333–340. [Google Scholar]
  61. Camina, J.P.; Carreira, M.C.; El Messari, S.; Llorens-Cortes, C.; Smith, R.G.; Casanueva, F.F. Desensitization and endocytosis mechanisms of ghrelin-activated growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 930–940. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tolle, V.; Zizzari, P.; Tomasetto, C.; Rio, M.C.; Epelbaum, J.; Bluet-Pajot, M.T. In vivo and in vitro effects of ghrelin/motilin-related peptide on growth hormone secretion in the rat. Neuroendocrinology 2001, 73, 54–61. [Google Scholar]
  63. Holliday, N.D.; Holst, B.; Rodionova, E.A.; Schwartz, T.W.; Cox, H.M. Importance of constitutive activity and arrestin-independent mechanisms for intracellular trafficking of the ghrelin receptor. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007, 21, 3100–3112. [Google Scholar]
  64. Delhanty, P.J.; van Kerkwijk, A.; Huisman, M.; van de Zande, B.; Verhoef-Post, M.; Gauna, C.; Hofland, L.; Themmen, A.P.; van der Lely, A.J. Unsaturated fatty acids prevent desensitization of the human growth hormone secretagogue receptor by blocking its internalization. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 299, E497–E505. [Google Scholar]
  65. Chow, K.B.; Sun, J.; Chu, K.M.; Tai, C.W.; Cheng, C.H.; Wise, H. The truncated ghrelin receptor polypeptide (GHS-R1b) is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum where it forms heterodimers with ghrelin receptors (GHS-R1a) to attenuate their cell surface expression. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2012, 348, 247–254. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hermansson, N.O.; Morgan, D.G.; Drmota, T.; Larsson, N. Adenosine is not a direct GHSR agonist—Artificial cross-talk between GHSR and adenosine receptor pathways. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 2007, 190, 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  67. Rediger, A.; Piechowski, C.L.; Yi, C.X.; Tarnow, P.; Strotmann, R.; Gruters, A.; Krude, H.; Schoneberg, T.; Tschop, M.H.; Kleinau, G.; et al. Mutually opposite signal modulation by hypothalamic heterodimerization of ghrelin and melanocortin-3 receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 39623–39631. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kern, A.; Albarran-Zeckler, R.; Walsh, H.E.; Smith, R.G. Apo-ghrelin receptor forms heteromers with DRD2 in hypothalamic neurons and is essential for anorexigenic effects of DRD2 agonism. Neuron 2012, 73, 317–332. [Google Scholar]
  69. Schellekens, H.; van Oeffelen, W.E.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Promiscuous dimerization of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R1a) attenuates ghrelin-mediated signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 181–191. [Google Scholar]
  70. Floquet, N.; M’Kadmi, C.; Perahia, D.; Gagne, D.; Berge, G.; Marie, J.; Baneres, J.L.; Galleyrand, J.C.; Fehrentz, J.A.; Martinez, J. Activation of the ghrelin receptor is described by a privileged collective motion: A model for constitutive and agonist-induced activation of a sub-class A G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 395, 769–784. [Google Scholar]
  71. Holst, B.; Holliday, N.D.; Bach, A.; Elling, C.E.; Cox, H.M.; Schwartz, T.W. Common structural basis for constitutive activity of the ghrelin receptor family. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 53806–53817. [Google Scholar]
  72. Mokrosinski, J.; Frimurer, T.M.; Sivertsen, B.; Schwartz, T.W.; Holst, B. Modulation of constitutive activity and signaling bias of the ghrelin receptor by conformational constraint in the second extracellular loop. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 33488–33502. [Google Scholar]
  73. Adams, E.F.; Petersen, B.; Lei, T.; Buchfelder, M.; Fahlbusch, R. The growth hormone secretagogue L-692429 induces phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and hormone secretion by human pituitary tumors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 208, 555–561. [Google Scholar]
  74. Lei, T.; Buchfelder, M.; Fahlbusch, R.; Adams, E.F. Growth hormone releasing peptide (GHRP-6) stimulates phosphatidylinositol (PI) turnover in human pituitary somatotroph cells. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 1995, 14, 135–138. [Google Scholar]
  75. Chen, C.; Wu, D.; Clarke, I.J. Signal transduction systems employed by synthetic GH-releasing peptides in somatotrophs. J. Endocrinol. 1996, 148, 381–386. [Google Scholar]
  76. Matthews, R.P.; Guthrie, C.R.; Wailes, L.M.; Zhao, X.; Means, A.R.; McKnight, G.S. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase types II and IV differentially regulate CREB-dependent gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14, 6107–6116. [Google Scholar]
  77. Singh, L.P.; Andy, J.; Anyamale, V.; Greene, K.; Alexander, M.; Crook, E.D. Hexosamine-induced fibronectin protein synthesis in mesangial cells is associated with increases in cAMP responsive element binding (CREB) phosphorylation and nuclear CREB: The involvement of protein kinases A and C. Diabetes 2001, 50, 2355–2362. [Google Scholar]
  78. Falls, H.D.; Dayton, B.D.; Fry, D.G.; Ogiela, C.A.; Schaefer, V.G.; Brodjian, S.; Reilly, R.M.; Collins, C.A.; Kaszubska, W. Characterization of ghrelin receptor activity in a rat pituitary cell line RC-4B/C. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2006, 37, 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  79. Wang, H.J.; Geller, F.; Dempfle, A.; Schauble, N.; Friedel, S.; Lichtner, P.; Fontenla-Horro, F.; Wudy, S.; Hagemann, S.; Gortner, L.; et al. Ghrelin receptor gene: identification of several sequence variants in extremely obese children and adolescents healthy normal-weight and underweight students and children with short normal stature. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 157–162. [Google Scholar]
  80. Holst, B.; Schwartz, T.W. Ghrelin receptor mutations—Too little height and too much hunger. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 637–641. [Google Scholar]
  81. Petersen, P.S.; Woldbye, D.P.; Madsen, A.N.; Egerod, K.L.; Jin, C.; Lang, M.; Rasmussen, M.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G.; Holst, B. In vivo characterization of high Basal signaling from the ghrelin receptor. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 4920–4930. [Google Scholar]
  82. Portelli, J.; Thielemans, L.; ver Donck, L.; Loyens, E.; Coppens, J.; Aourz, N.; Aerssens, J.; Vermoesen, K.; Clinckers, R.; Schallier, A.; et al. Inactivation of the constitutively active ghrelin receptor attenuates limbic seizure activity in rodents. Neurotherapeutics 2012, 9, 658–672. [Google Scholar]
  83. Albarran-Zeckler, R.G.; Brantley, A.F.; Smith, R.G. Growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R1a) knockout mice exhibit improved spatial memory and deficits in contextual memory. Behav. Brain Res. 2012, 232, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  84. Davis, J.F.; Choi, D.L.; Clegg, D.J.; Benoit, S.C. Signaling through the ghrelin receptor modulates hippocampal function and meal anticipation in mice. Physiol. Behav. 2011, 103, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  85. Esposito, M.; Pellinen, J.; Kapas, L.; Szentirmai, E. Impaired wake-promoting mechanisms in ghrelin receptor-deficient mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2012, 35, 233–243. [Google Scholar]
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert